Abstract
Organ size is regulated by intercellular signaling for cell growth and proliferation. The TOR pathway mediates a key signaling mechanism for controlling cell size and number in organ growth. Chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT) is a complex that assists protein folding and function, but its role in animal development is largely unknown. Here we show that the CCT complex is required for organ growth by interacting with the TOR pathway in Drosophila. Reduction of CCT4 results in growth defects by affecting both cell size and proliferation. Loss of CCT4 causes preferential cell death anterior to the morphogenetic furrow in the eye disc and within wing pouch in the wing disc. Depletion of any CCT subunit in the eye disc results in headless phenotype. Overgrowth by active TOR signaling is suppressed by CCT RNAi. The CCT complex physically interacts with TOR signaling components including TOR, Rheb, and S6K. Loss of CCT leads to decreased phosphorylation of S6K and S6 while increasing phosphorylation of Akt. Insulin/TOR signaling is also necessary and sufficient for promoting CCT complex transcription. Our data provide evidence that the CCT complex regulates organ growth by directly interacting with the TOR signaling pathway.
Subject terms: TOR signalling, Genetics, Experimental organisms, Genetics, Experimental organisms
Introduction
Organ size is regulated by intercellular signaling for cell growth and proliferation during development. The insulin/TOR signaling pathway is a highly conserved mechanism for controlling cell and organismal growth [1, 2]. This pathway is activated in response to a variety of environmental cues such as nutrients, hypoxia, osmotic stress, and DNA damage [3]. Insulin signaling leads to activation of TOR kinase through signal transduction steps including PI3K, Akt, and Rheb. Activated TOR phosphorylates its targets S6K and 4E-BP to promote cell growth and also affects cell cycle regulators to increase proliferation. Dysregulation in insulin/TOR signaling causes systemic disorders, including cancer, diabetes, and aging [4].
Drosophila has been an excellent animal model for molecular genetic analysis of signaling pathways involved in organ growth in vivo. The insulin/TOR signaling pathway has been extensively characterized in developing imaginal discs, but relatively little is known about how formation and maintenance of the signaling components are regulated. In our attempt to identify new genes involved in organ growth, we found an RNAi line that causes severe growth defects in the eye and head. Intriguingly, the gene responsible for this RNAi phenotype encodes CCT4, a subunit of the chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT) complex. These findings raised the possibility that CCT plays a critical role in developing tissues.
CCT is a chaperonin complex that regulates protein conformation and function. It is a large double-ring complex with a central cavity. Each ring is composed of eight paralogous subunits (CCT1–CCT8) [5, 6]. CCT complex has been predicted to interact with approximately 10% of newly synthesized proteins, among which actin and tubulin are representative substrates of the complex [7–9]. Importantly, evidence is growing that CCT is involved in the development and progression of cancer by interacting with oncogenic factors that regulate tissue growth and apoptosis [10–14]. CCT can also assist the assembly of protein complexes such as von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor protein complex, Gβγ dimer, Bardet–Biedl syndrome protein (BBSome) complex, and basal transcription factor TFIID [15–18]. In addition, CCT plays a role in the disassembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes (MCC) [19]. CCT loss-of-function mutations in S. cerevisiae cause lethality, indicating the essential role of CCT complex [20]. CCT complex is also involved in protein trafficking by interacting with intracellular chain of Orai1 membrane protein [21]. Several in vivo studies suggest that CCT might play roles in autophagy, cell division, cell migration, life span, and sarcomere assembly [22–26].
A recent proteomic analysis of InR/PI3K/Akt network in Drosophila has shown that approximately 10% of interacting partners with the network are dynamically phosphorylated in response to insulin stimulation and one of the known interacting partners is CCT8 [27]. In addition, it was reported that CCT2 is phosphorylated by p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) and p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (S6K) in mammalian cells in response to extracellular stimuli [28]. Phosphorylation of CCT subunits by extracellular signals suggests that folding activity of CCT complex might be tightly regulated by the insulin/TOR signaling pathway to accelerate protein synthesis. However, it is unknown whether loss of CCT complex function affects the growth signaling pathways in animal development and how the levels of CCT complex are regulated.
In this study, we show that the CCT complex is essential for Drosophila organ development by interacting with insulin/TOR signaling. Reduction of the CCT complex leads to decreases in phospho-S6K and phospho-S6 while increasing phospho-Akt. The CCT complex physically interacts with insulin/TOR signaling components like TOR, Rheb, and S6K. Growth defects by reduced CCT complex function can be partially suppressed by overexpressing Cyclin E (CycE). In addition, we found that insulin/TOR signaling regulates CCT complex levels at both mRNA and protein levels. To our knowledge, this study provides first in vivo evidence that the CCT complex is required for TOR signaling and that the transcription of CCT complex is regulated by insulin/TOR signaling.
Results
Identification of CCT4 as an essential gene for organ growth
CCT has been implicated in cell division and survival in eukaryotic cells [29, 30], but its role in tissue growth at organismal level remains largely unknown. Our preliminary finding of a CCT4 function in organ development led us to further investigate the effects of CCT4 loss in adult and developing organs. When CCT4 was knocked down by RNAi (v106099) in eye discs by using ey-Gal4 that drives GAL4 expression in eye and head primordia (hereafter ey>CCT4 RNAi for ey-Gal4; UAS-CCT4 RNAi), all progeny died during the late pupal stage (Fig. 1a). Similar results were obtained by an additional CCT4 RNAi line (5525R-3). Dead flies in pupal cases had relatively intact thorax and abdomen but completely lacked the eye-head structures. We found that the eye-head field in larval eye discs targeted by ey-Gal4 was lost (Fig. 1b, c), resulting in the headless phenotype and late pupal lethality. We also generated whole-eye mutant clones for CCT4 using the ey-Gal4 UAS-Flp-hid (EGUF/hid) technique [31]. Eyes with EGUF-hid clones mainly consist of CCT4 mutant cells because CCT4+ wild-type cells are selectively ablated by the expression of hid cell death gene. When EGUF-hid clones were generated by using two CCT4 mutant alleles (CCT4KG09280 and CCT4LL03589), most of the animals with CCT4 mutant clones died at pupal stages with headless phenotype. The size of CCT4 mutant eyes of survived adult escapers was considerably reduced to about 20% of the wild-type control size (Fig. 1d–f), confirming that CCT4 is essential for eye development.
To examine the roles of CCT4 in different organ development, we compared the effects of engrailed (en)>+ and en>CCT4 RNAi in wing discs. CCT4 RNAi in the posterior wing disc under en-Gal4 caused early pupal lethality. Wing discs from en>CCT4 RNAi showed almost complete loss of the posterior compartment marked by en>GFP (Fig. 2a). In comparison to control en>+, CCT4-depleted larvae showed considerable developmental delay during its growth up to the third-instar stage (Fig. 2b), eventually resulting in pupal lethality. patched (ptc)>CCT4 RNAi led to reduced tissue growth in the ptc domain along the anterior–posterior boundary of wing disc (Fig. 2c). Consistent with the expression of ptc-Gal4 in the salivary gland, CCT4 RNAi reduced the size of the gland compared with control (Fig. 2d). In addition, knockdown of CCT4 in the wing pouch region of the developing wing disc under MS1096-Gal4 led to loss of adult wing (Fig. 2e). Taken together, our data demonstrate that CCT4 plays important roles in development of multiple organs.
Loss of the CCT complex leads to decreases in cell growth, division, and survival
The data shown in Figs. 1 and 2 indicated that CCT4 is essential for tissue development. To check whether loss of CCT4 affects cell growth and/or division, we first compared the tissue size and measured the cell numbers in the ptc domain between L3 and L4 veins. As shown in Fig. 3a, ptc>CCT4 RNAi resulted in about 40% reduction in the region between L3 and L4 veins compared to ptc>+ control wing (Fig. 3a, b). Since each hair represents a single cell in the adult wing, we divided the tissue size by the hair numbers to estimate relative cell size. In ptc>CCT4 RNAi, both the relative cell size and cell number were reduced by 21% and 23% respectively (Fig. 3b), indicating that CCT4 is important for the regulation of both cell size and number. To exclude the possibility that the loss-of-function phenotype by CCT4 RNAi is caused by off-target effects, we tested whether either fly CCT4 (dCCT4) or human CCT4 (hCCT4) can rescue the ptc>CCT4 RNAi phenotype. Growth defect resulting from ptc>CCT4 RNAi was rescued by overexpressing either dCCT4 or hCCT4 (Fig. 3c). More severe growth defects caused by nub>CCT4 RNAi or ey>CCT RNAi were also rescued by overexpressing either dCCT4 or hCCT4 (Supplementary Figure 1 and Fig. 3d). These results suggest that CCT4 RNAi phenotypes are specific on-target effects.
To check whether loss of CCT4 affects cell survival during development, we immunostained wing discs with an anti-cleaved Caspase-3 (Cas-3) apoptosis marker and found that the level of cleaved Cas-3 was increased in ptc>CCT4 RNAi wing disc (Fig. 3e). A cell membrane marker Discs-large (Dlg) was reduced in the region of cleaved Cas-3 staining, consistent with cell death. Interestingly, cell death was mainly restricted to the posterior part of the ptc domain in the wing pouch. Furthermore, no cleaved Cas-3 staining was detected in the ptc domain outside the wing pouch. This suggests that CCT4 is required for cell survival in specific cell types.
We also examined the effects of CCT mutant clones in the eye disc. An eye disc can be divided into the anterior and the posterior region by the morphogenetic furrow [32]. The anterior region is composed of dividing cells, whereas the posterior region is mainly comprised of differentiating cells. Most of CCT4 mutant clones were very small, indicating that mutant cells are defective in proliferation and/or cell survival. CCT4 mutant clones in the anterior part of the eye disc showed positive-staining for cleaved Cas-3 (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Figure 2A). However, CCT4 mutant clones in the posterior part of the eye disc did not show any detectable ectopic cell death. Interestingly, ectopic cell death was also found in antenna disc containing CCT4KG09280 mutant clones (indicated by an arrow in Supplementary Figure 2B). In addition, we checked whether RNAi knockdown of CCT complex subunits can cause ectopic cell death under GMR-Gal4 driver that is expressed in the eye region posterior to the morphogenetic furrow. Consistent with the results from CCT4 mutant clones, RNAi knockdown of any CCT complex subunit under GMR-Gal4 did not cause ectopic cell death (Supplementary Figure 3A), resulting in normal adult eye morphology (Supplementary Figure 3B). These data indicate that the CCT complex is more critical for cell survival in dividing cells but not in differentiating cells.
In addition, we generated CCT4 mutant clones at different time points and examined their effects. When clones were induced by heat-shock-inducible Flp (hs-Flp) 24 h before dissection, CCT4LL63589 mutant clones showed similar sizes compared with twin spots (Supplementary Figure 4A). However, when clones were induced 48 h before dissection, most mutant clones disappeared while twin spots grew larger (Supplementary Figure 4B). Hence, CCT4 mutant cells can initially survive and divide up to 24 h but fail to survive afterwards, leading to the removal of mutant cells. The initial survival of CCT4 mutant cells might be due to persistence of CCT4 mRNA and protein. Nonetheless, these data suggest that CCT4 is required for cell growth, division, and survival in cell- and tissue-dependent manners.
All CCT subunits are required for the CCT complex function
To examine the expression and stability of CCT4 proteins in developing tissues, we generated an anti-CCT4 antibody using a region of CCT protein (MBP-CCT4385–524). Specificity of the CCT4 antibody was confirmed by selective reduction of CCT4 protein level in the ptc domain of ptc>CCT4 RNAi wing disc (Fig. 4a, b). Reduction of CCT4 protein level was also confirmed in CCT4LL03589 wing mutant clones (Supplementary Figure 5). Since eight CCT subunits function together as a protein complex, it is possible that loss of one CCT subunit affects the stability of other subunit proteins. To test this possibility, we knocked down different CCT genes and checked the level of CCT4 protein. RNAi for CCT1 to CCT8 in the developing wing discs using nub-Gal4 resulted in reduced CCT4 protein levels, suggesting that the level of CCT4 is affected by other CCT subunits (Fig. 4c). We also confirmed these results by western blot analysis. RNAi knockdown of CCT1 to CCT8 in S2R+ cells resulted in similar reduction of both CCT1 and CCT4 protein levels (Fig. 4d). Furthermore, we checked the effect of CCT4 mutation on endogenous levels of CCT1 and CCT4 proteins. When adult fly extracts of wild-type control and CCT4KG09280/+ were examined on western blot, both CCT1 and CCT4 protein levels were reduced in CCT4KG09280/+ heterozygotes (Fig. 4e). Since loss of different CCT subunits resulted in reduction of CCT1 or CCT4 protein levels, it is possible that loss of any CCT subunit leads to similar loss-of-function phenotypes by disrupting the function of the CCT complex in vivo. As indicated in Fig. 4f, RNAi knockdown of any single CCT subunit under ey-Gal4 driver caused pupal lethality with similar headless phenotypes. These data suggest that each subunit contributes to the function of the CCT complex.
Genetic interaction between CCT complex and growth signaling pathways
Defects in cell growth and division are one of the key characteristics in insulin/TOR signaling mutants. To test whether the CCT complex is associated with insulin/TOR signaling, we checked genetic interaction between CCT4 and insulin/TOR signaling. As described earlier, CCT4 RNAi under ptc-Gal4 results in tissue reduction (Fig. 5a). When insulin/TOR signaling was activated by overexpressing Pi3KCA and Rheb under ptc-Gal4 driver, the wing tissue size between L3 and L4 veins was increased approximately 25%. However, Pi3KCA or Rheb overexpression could not suppress the CCT4 RNAi phenotype (Fig. 5a, b). These results suggest that the effects of PI3K or Rheb overexpression depend on CCT4 function. In S2R+ cells, CCT4 RNAi did not affect the Rheb protein level (Fig. 8c), indicating that CCT4 function might be required to mediate the effects of Rheb overexpression instead of regulating the level of Rheb. In addition, Rheb2D1 loss-of-function mutation enhanced ptc>CCT4 RNAi phenotype (Supplementary Figure 6). Thus, CCT4 RNAi shows genetic interaction with gain or reduction of Rheb function.
We also examined relationships between CCT and TOR downstream factors. Overexpression of Tor, S6k, and eIF4E could not rescue ptc>CCT4 RNAi phenotype (Fig. 5c). We then tested the effect of CycE since the CycE protein level is reduced in Tor mutants in Drosophila [33] and based on the fact that CycE is known as a folding substrate for the CCT chaperonin [34]. Interestingly, the reduced wing size resulting from CCT4 RNAi was rescued by overexpressing CycE (Fig. 5a, b). The wing size suppression by CycE was partial but consistently observed in 100% of flies examined. CycE levels can also be regulated by other mechanisms such as Hippo and EGFR/Ras signaling pathways [35, 36]. Overexpression of Yorkie (Yki) by ptc-Gal4 increased the ptc region in the wing but did not suppress the CCT4 RNAi phenotype. Our data show that activated Ras (RasV12) or EGFR (EGFRAct) overexpression by ptc-Gal4 causes embryonic lethality or reduced wing, respectively (Fig. 5a). These effects might be due to non-autonomous cell death caused by activated Ras in imaginal discs [37]. Interestingly, CCT4 RNAi flies expressing RasV12 were viable, suggesting a role of CCT4 in RasV12 function by an unknown mechanism. Nonetheless, activated Ras or EGFR did not affect the CCT4 RNAi phenotype in the wing (Fig. 5a). Hence, CCT seems to be epistatic to not only TOR but also Yki and EGFR/Ras, implying possible roles of the CCT complex in multiple signaling pathways.
CCT physically interacts with components of TOR signaling
Our data above suggest that the CCT complex genetically interacts with Rheb (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Figure 6). To further characterize this interaction, we tested physical interaction between CCT proteins and Rheb. We carried out co-immunoprecipitation using protein extracts from S2 cells transfected with Myc-CCT4 and Rheb-V5. As shown in Supplementary Figure 7A, Rheb-V5 was co-immunoprecipitated with Myc-CCT4. When either endogenous CCT1 or CCT4 protein was immunoprecipitated, endogenous Rheb was co-immunoprecipiated (Fig. 6a, b). Next, we performed MBP-pulldown assay to check whether CCT4 and Rheb directly interact. Pulldown assay showed that GST-CCT4 binds to MBP-Rheb (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Figure 7B), suggesting their direct interaction. Previously, it has been shown that a 55 amino acid domain of human VHL protein binds to CCT complex [15]. Sequence comparison indicated that Rheb has a 15 amino acid region that shows a weak similarity (33.3% identity/53.3% similarity) to the CCT complex-binding domain of VHL. Mutated Rheb deleted in this 15 amino acid region (RhebΔ49–63) showed reduced binding to CCT4 (Fig. 6c–c′), suggesting that the deleted region is important for CCT complex binding as in the human VHL–CCT complex interaction. In addition, S6K was co-immunoprecipitated with CCT4 proteins in adult fly extracts (Fig. 6d), and MBP-pulldown assay indicated that S6K directly interacts with CCT4 (Supplementary Figure 7C). We found two regions of S6K that show low levels of similarity (26.7% identity/37.5% similarity) to the VHL domain for CCT complex binding. However, deletion of both regions did not affect the binding of S6K to CCT4 (Supplementary Figure 7C), suggesting that S6K interacts with CCT4 through a different domain(s). Finally, we also found that TOR protein was co-immunoprecipitated with CCT4 proteins in both adult fly extracts and S2R+ cell lysates (Fig. 6e, f). These data suggest that the CCT complex is physically associated with multiple TOR pathway components.
Reduced CCT complex affects the level of phosphorylated S6k and Akt
Since CCT complex and TOR signaling show genetic and physical interactions as shown above, we tested whether loss of CCT4 affects insulin/TOR signaling. We checked the levels of phospho-S6K (P-S6K) and phospho-S6 (P-S6) in adult CCT4KG09280/+ heterozygous mutant extracts. In CCT4KG09280/+ heterozygotes, phosphorylation levels of S6K and S6 proteins were reduced while there was little change in the total S6K protein level (Fig. 7a), indicating that the CCT complex is required for activation of TOR kinase.
Akt/PKB signaling is a conserved pathway that integrates responses to growth factors, nutrients, metabolites, and stress. Akt/PKB signaling utilizes feedback mechanisms to regulate cell proliferation and cell size [38]. Activation of Akt/TOR signaling is also regulated by a negative feedback mechanism during normal Drosophila development. Phospho-Akt (P-Akt) was used as a marker for the negative feedback status in Akt/TOR signaling [39]. Since S6K is required for the regulation of the negative feedback in Akt/TOR signaling and the P-S6K level was reduced by CCT4KG0928 mutant heterozygotes, we checked whether reduction of CCT complex function results in any change in the P-Akt level. As shown in Fig. 7a, an aberrant increase in the P-Akt level was found in CCT4KG0928 mutant heterozygotes with no change in the total Akt protein level. To check whether the P-Akt level is increased by loss of CCT complex during development, we immunostained CCT-depleted wing discs with P-Akt antibody. When any of CCT1–8 subunits was knocked down in wing discs, P-Akt level was increased (Fig. 7b). We also tested whether knockdown of the CCT complex increases the P-Akt level in S2R+ cells. Akt phosphorylation was detected only when the cells were treated with insulin. In insulin-treated cells, P-Akt level was significantly increased by CCT4-knockdown (Fig. 7c). Furthermore, P-Akt level was similarly elevated by depleting any of the eight CCT subunits in insulin-treated S2R+ cells (Fig. 7d). These data show that loss of CCT complex activity leads to decreased TOR signaling activity and increased P-Akt level.
CCT complex levels are regulated by insulin/TOR signaling
Since insulin/TOR signaling increases protein synthesis upon activation, we hypothesized that CCT complex levels might also be regulated by TOR signaling. To test this hypothesis, we checked the level of all CCT mRNA in wild type and tsc2 KO S2R+ cells with or without rapamycin treatment. As shown in Fig. 8a, all CCT mRNA levels were higher in tsc2 KO cells compared to wild-type cells. Rapamycin treatment significantly reduced the levels of all CCT mRNA in both wild type and tsc2 KO S2R+ cells, indicating that TOR signaling is required for transcription of all CCT subunits.
We also tested whether insulin treatment can enhance transcription of CCT complex genes. In wild-type S2R+ cells, all CCT mRNA levels were increased after insulin treatment (Fig. 8b), indicating that activation of insulin signaling is sufficient to increase CCT complex transcription. In addition, CCT4 protein levels were decreased when rapamycin was treated in S2R+ cells (Fig. 8c). The reduction of CCT4 protein levels was further confirmed in Akt or Tor RNAi-treated cells (Fig. 8d). These results suggest that insulin/TOR signaling regulates CCT complex expression at the transcriptional level, possibly affecting their protein levels (Fig. 8e).
Discussion
In this study, we have shown that the CCT complex is essential for the regulation of cell growth, proliferation, and survival during Drosophila organ development by interacting with the insulin/TOR signaling pathway. We have demonstrated that CCT is critical for development of multiple organs including eye, wing, and salivary gland. Clonal analysis shows that CCT4 mutant cells fail to proliferate and disappear by cell death. This indicates that CCT4 is cell-autonomously required for cell division and survival. Analyses of CCT RNAi effects in wings and salivary glands suggest that reduced CCT function not only affects cell number but also cell size, as commonly seen in tissues impaired by TOR pathway mutations.
Depletion of any CCT subunit by ey-Gal4 resulted in loss of larval eye disc and the headless phenotype in adults (Figs. 1 and 4f), implying that CCT is required during early stages of eye-head development. However, the headless phenotype was not rescued by blocking cell death with P35 overexpression (data not shown). Clonal analysis indicates that CCT4 mutant cells can form small clones but these clones disappeared shortly by cell death (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Figure 2). Interestingly, cell death in CCT4 mutant clones is restricted to the region anterior to the morphogenetic furrow of the eye disc. Selective knockdown of CCT subunits posterior to the furrow by using GMR-Gal4 did not induce ectopic cell death, resulting in nearly normal eyes (Supplementary Figure 3). Because the anterior and the posterior regions of the eye disc are mostly proliferating and differentiating, respectively, CCT complex seems to be preferentially required for promotion of cell proliferation and survival of dividing cells prior to the onset of differentiation.
Our study on wing shows that CCT4 RNAi by en-Gal4 or MS1096-Gal4 can ablate the entire wing tissue. As in the eye, we found cell or tissue-specific requirements of CCT complex function. For example, RNAi in the developing wing using ptc-Gal4 leads to ectopic cell death in the AP boundary within the wing pouch but not the surrounding area (Fig. 3e). A wing disc consists of the wing pouch in the central (distal) region and surrounding (proximal) region for hinge and other thoracic tissues. Thus, CCT complex appears to be essential for survival of wing cells but not for other thoracic parts. These data suggest that the CCT complex is involved in organ growth as a tissue-specific regulator rather than a general factor for cell survival.
The CCT complex consists of eight related subunits. An intriguing question is whether all eight subunits are essential for the structure and function of the CCT complex. Several observations support that all subunits depend on each other for the stability and function of the complex. First, loss of other CCT subunits leads to reduction of the CCT1 and CCT4 protein levels (Fig. 4c, d). Moreover, knockdown of any CCT subunit in eye disc causes similar headless phenotype (Fig. 4f). A recent zebrafish study has also reported that mutants in any CCT subunit show similar defects likely affecting the stability of the CCT complex [25]. Therefore, it seems that all CCT subunits in Drosophila and zebrafish contribute to non-redundant functions for the CCT complex.
Earlier studies have suggested that the function of CCT can be modulated by TOR signaling. In mammalian cells, CCT2 is phosphorylated by S6 kinase upon growth factor treatment, and the CCT2 phosphorylation is important for cell proliferation [28] although the phosphorylation site (Ser-260) of mammalian CCT2 is not conserved in Drosophila CCT2. Insulin-dependent phosphorylation of CCT8 subunit has been observed in Drosophila cell culture [27], but its physiological significance is unknown. Our data in this study provide evidence for a link between CCT complex and insulin/TOR signaling. Reduced cell number and cell size caused by CCT mutations or RNAi are characteristic of insulin/TOR signaling mutants. Our genetic and biochemical data support a role of CCT complex in TOR signaling. Activating insulin/TOR signaling fails to induce overgrowth when CCT4 is depleted (Fig. 5a). In addition, we also found that Rheb2D1 mutation enhanced CCT4 RNAi phenotype (Supplementary Figure 6). These data suggest a functional relationship between CCT and insulin/TOR signaling. Furthermore, CCT4 heterozygous mutation causes a reduction of P-S6K while the total level of S6K is unchanged (Fig. 7a). Thus, CCT is required to promote TOR-dependent S6K phosphorylation. It is also noteworthy that depletion of any CCT subunit leads to an increase in P-Akt level (Fig. 7b, d). Since S6K activity is associated with the negative feedback regulation of Akt activity, the decreased S6K activity by loss of CCT function may be responsible for the ectopic upregulation of Akt/TOR signaling.
Our results demonstrate that loss of CCT function results in severe growth defects, but these phenotypes cannot be suppressed by overexpression of TOR pathway factors such as Rheb and S6K. One possibility is that CCT might be necessary for the stability of overexpressed TOR components. However, this possibility may be unlikely because we have not noticed detectable changes in the level of several TOR components such as TOR, Akt, and Rheb by CCT4 RNAi (Fig. 8d). Alternatively, overexpression of any one TOR substrate may be insufficient to suppress the CCT RNAi phenotypes because TOR kinase regulates multiple target proteins. It should be noticed that the phenotypes by CCT mutations or RNAi seem to be more severe than those of Tor null mutation (TorΔP) described earlier [33]. Development of Tor mutants is arrested at larval stage, and mutant clones in imaginal discs are similar in size to their twin spots at 48 h after induction. Afterwards, clones are eliminated probably due to cell competition with adjacent wild-type cells. CCT4 mutant clones showed similar loss of mutant cells within 48 h after induction (Supplementary Figure 4), suggesting that CCT mutant phenotypes may be even more severe than that of Tor null mutation. Several possibilities can be considered. Firstly, different levels of maternal expression of Tor and CCT genes from heterozygous females may affect the severity of phenotypes of homozygous mutant offspring. Secondly, CCT mutations may cause pleiotrophic phenotypes because CCT complex can interact with a number of proteins in addition to TOR signaling components. According to our genetic interaction data, the activation of Yki or EGFR signaling alone fails to alter the CCT RNAi phenotype, suggesting that CCT is epistatic to Yki and EGFR as well as TOR. Since CCT complex are likely to be involved in multiple signaling pathways, activation of multiple signaling pathways might be needed to rescue CCT4 RNAi phenotypes. More details about the relationships between the CCT complex and other signaling pathways need future studies.
Our data indicate that CCT proteins physically interact with multiple TOR signaling components. Thus, loss of CCT complex may result in more severe phenotypes than loss of a single TOR signaling factor. This possibility is consistent with our data that CCT4 physically interacts with at least three TOR factors, Rheb, S6K, and TOR kinase (Fig. 6). Several studies have suggested that CCT complex can provide a platform for organizing protein complexes and assist the complex formation [15–18]. The CCT complex might be required for the formation of an active TOR complex by physically interacting with multiple TOR factors.
Lastly, we found that transcription of CCT complex was reduced by rapamycin treatment or increased by tsc2 KO or insulin treatment (Fig. 8a, b), suggesting that CCT complex is not only required but also regulated by TOR signaling. Remarkably, our data reveal that CCT complex function is tissue specific. It is an intriguing possibility that interactions between the CCT complex and TOR signaling proteins are modulated in cell or tissue-specific manner. It remains to be studied whether the functional relationship between CCT complex and TOR signaling shown in this study is conserved in vertebrate systems.
Experimental procedures
Fly genetics
All Drosophila strains were grown and maintained at 25 °C. UAS-CCT1 RNAi (5374R-2, NIG and v34070, VDRC), UAS-CCT2 RNAi (v108615, VDRC and 7033R-1, NIG), UAS-CCT3 RNAi (v36070, VDRC and 8977R-1, NIG), UAS-CCT4 RNAi (v106099, VDRC and 5525R-3, NIG), UAS-CCT5 RNAi (8439R-1, NIG and v109505, VDRC), UAS-CCT6 RNAi (v108596, VDRC and v23751, VDRC), UAS-CCT7 RNAi (v108585, VDRC and 8351R-3, NIG), UAS-CCT8 RNAi (v103905, VDRC and 8258R-2, NIG), UAS-PI3KCA (8294, BDSC), UAS-Rheb, UAS-pten RNAi (25841, BDSC), UAS-TOR (7012, BDSC), UAS-S6k (6912, BDSC), UAS-eIF-4E (8650, BDSC), UAS-CycE [40], UAS-EGFRCA (59843, BDSC), UAS-Ras85DV12 (4847, BDSC), UAS-yki.GFP (28815, BDSC), Rheb2D1/TM6B [41], ey-Gal4, ptc-Gal4, en-Gal4, nub-Gal4, MS1096-Gal4 were used. For generation of UAS-dCCT4 and UAS-hCCT4, coding cDNA sequences of Drosophila CCT4 and human CCT4 were cloned into pUAST attB vector using one-step SLIC method [42] and cloned vectors were injected into P2 (3L, 68A4) sites using site-specific Phi31-mediated insertion (GenetiVision) [43]. For generation of CCT4 mutant clones, FRT42D CCT4KG09280/CyO (111690, Kyoto DGRC) or FRT42D CCT4LL03589/CyO (141081, Kyoto DGRC) was crossed with hsflp; FRT42D ubiGFP, and first-instar larvae were treated with heat shock for 60 min at 37 °C. For EGUF clones, FRT42D GMR-hid l(2)CL-R1/CyO; ey-Gal4 UAS-flp flies (5251, BDSC) were used for crossing with FRT42D CCTKG09280/CyO or FRT42D CCT4LL03589/CyO.
Immunostaining
Third-instar larvae were dissected in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Collected tissues were fixed at 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. After washing twice with PBS, fixed tissues were blocked in 5% normal goat serum/PBT (PBS + 0.3% Triton X-100) for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were incubated with primary antibodies in 5% NGS/PBT at 4 °C for overnight. Following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-CCT4 (1:2000) (this study), rabbit anti-Dlg (1:500) (Kyung-Ok Cho, KAIST), mouse anti-Dlg (1:100) (DSHB), sheep anti-GFP (1:100) (Bio-Rad, 4745-1051), rabbit anti-Cleaved Caspase-3 (Asp175) (1:100) (Cell Signaling, 9661), rabbit anti-phospho-Drosophila Akt (Ser505) (1:100) (Cell Signaling, 4054). After washing three times with PBT, secondary antibody conjugated with FITC (1:100), Cy3 (1:600), or Cy5 (1:500) (Alexa Fluor, Molecular Probes) were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. For Phalloidin staining, Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin (Molecular Probes A12379) was incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing three times with PBT, Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) antifade reagent was used for mounting prepared samples. A Carl Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope was used to acquire fluorescent images.
Immunoprecipitation
For co-immunoprecipitation using adult fly extracts, S2 cell extracts, and S2R+ cell extracts, 1 mg of protein lysates were used after lysis using IP buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.2 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 5% glycerol, 80 mM KCl, 0.2% NP-40, protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche)). The lysates were incubated with antibodies for overnight at 4 °C, and then 50 μl of SureBead Protein A (Bio-Rad) was added and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. After washing in IP buffer four times, proteins were eluted in 2× sample buffer.
Pulldown assay
For pulldown assay, plasmids for MBP-Rheb and GST-CCT4 were used to transform IPTG-inducible BL21 competent cells. For cloning partial Rheb or S6k constructs, corresponding DNA fragments were amplified by PCR and cloned into pMAL-c2 vector using In-Fusion cloning (Takara). Tagged proteins were purified using a standard method. Pulldown buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, and protease inhibitor cocktail) was used. For western blot analysis, rabbit anti-MBP antibody (1:5000, Santa Cruz sc-271524), rabbit anti-GST antibody (1:5000, Santa Cruz sc-138 hrp), and secondary anti-rabbit antibody conjugated with HRP (Jackson) were used for western blotting.
Cell culture, reagents, RNA interference, and transfection
S2 cells, wild-type S2R+ cells, and tsc2 KO S2R+ cells [44, 45] were grown in Schneider’s Drosophila Media (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and penicillin–streptomycin. For insulin treatment, 25 µg/ml of insulin was treated for the indicated time lengths. For rapamycin (LC Laboratories) treatment, cells were incubated with 20 nM rapamycin for the indicated time lengths.
For RNAi experiments, PCR templates for dsRNA against CCT1 through CCT8 were prepared using primers designed by SnapDragon-dsRNA design (http://www.flyrnai.org/snapdragon). dsRNAs for CCT1-8 were generated by PCR using MEGAscript T7 (Ambion) and purified using MEGAClear (Ambion). Thirty micrograms of dsRNA was treated in S2R+ cells in six-well plates for 3 days using bathing method [46].
For immunoprecipitation between Myc-CCT4 and Rheb-V5 proteins, coding sequences of CCT4 and Rheb were cloned into pAc5.1-V5/His (Invitrogen) with N-terminal Myc tag with and without C-terminal stop codon, respectively. The cloned constructs were transfected in S2 cells using Effectene reagent (Qiagen).
Quantification of mRNA expression
Total RNA of S2R+ cells was extracted by TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNAs were synthesized by iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad) and iQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad) were used for quantitative PCR. All expression data were normalized to Rp49. Primers for CCT1-8 were designed using FlyPrimerBank [47]. The primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Information.
Immunoblotting
For protein extraction from S2R+ cells, cell lysates were extracted in lysis buffer (50 mM TrisCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche). For protein extraction from adult flies, one-day-old flies were collected, and proteins were extracted in lysis buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Protein concentrations of the cleared lysate after two times centrifugation (13,000 r.p.m.) at 4 °C were measured, and the same amount of proteins was used for western blot analysis.
For immunostaining of western blots, following antibodies were used: mouse anti-V5 (1:5000, Invitrogen R960-25), mouse anti-Myc (1:1000, Santa Cruz sc-47694), rabbit anti-CCT4 (1:20,000) (this study), rat anti-CCT1 antibody (1:1000, Abcam ab90357), rat anti-Rheb (1:500) [48], and mouse S6K (1:1000) [40], rabbit phospho-S6K (1:1000, Cell signaling 9209), rabbit phospho-S6 (1:5000) [49], rabbit anti-Histone 3 (1:10,000, Millipore 05-928), rabbit anti-GAPDH (1:5000, GeneTex 100118), rabbit anti-Akt (1:1000, Cell Signaling 4691), rabbit anti-phospho-Akt (1:1000, Cell Signaling 4054), mouse anti-Tubulin (1:5000, Sigma T5168), guinea pig anti-TOR (1:2000) [50], rat anti-TOR (1:2000) [51].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. All experiments were performed at least three times. P-values of <0.05 were considered as statistically significant. All data represent the mean ± s.e.m. (standard error of the means).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Kyungok Cho, Jongkyeong Chung, Aurelio Teleman, Gabor Juhasz, Norbert Perrimon, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, the National Institute of Genetics, the the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center, the Kyoto Stock Center, the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for reagents and fly stocks. We also thank Jean Jung for commenting on the manuscript. This research was supported by grants (NRF-2014K1A1A2042982 and NRF-2017R1A2B3007516) of the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science & Technology, Republic of Korea.
Author contributions
A.-R.K. and K.-W.C designed the study and wrote the manuscript. A.-R.K. performed experiments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41388-019-0754-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Hay N, Sonenberg N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1926–45. doi: 10.1101/gad.1212704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saxton RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;168:960–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reiling JH, Sabatini DM. Stress and mTORture signaling. Oncogene. 2006;25:6373–83. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.White MF. Insulin signaling in health and disease. Science. 2003;302:1710–1. doi: 10.1126/science.1092952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frydman J. Folding of new lytranslated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:603–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lewis VA, Hynes GM, Zheng D, Saibil H, Willison K. T-complex polypeptide-1 is a subunit of a heteromeric particle in the eukaryotic cytosol. Nature. 1992;358:249. doi: 10.1038/358249a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yam AY, Xia Y, Lin HT, Burlingame A, Gerstein M, Frydman J. Defining the TRiC/CCT interactome links chaperonin function to stabilization of newly made proteins with complex topologies. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:1255–62. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Raineri E, Ribeca P, Serrano L, Maier T. A more precise characterization of chaperonin substrates. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1685–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Svanstrom A, Grantham J. The molecular chaperone CCT modulates the activity of the actin filament severing and capping protein gelsolin in vitro. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2016;21:55–62. doi: 10.1007/s12192-015-0637-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boudiaf-Benmammar C, Cresteil T, Melki R. The cytosolic chaperonin CCT/TRiC and cancer cell proliferation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e60895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Trinidad Antonio G, Muller Patricia A, Cuellar J, Klejnot M, Nobis M, Valpuesta José M, et al. Interaction of p53 with the CCT complex promotes protein folding and wild-type p53 activity. Mol Cell. 2013;50:805–17. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bassiouni R, Nemec KN, Iketani A, Flores O, Showalter A, Khaled AS, et al. Chaperonin containing TCP-1 protein level in breast cancer cells predicts therapeutic application of a cytotoxic peptide. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:4366. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu YJ, Kumar V, Lin YF, Liang PH. Disrupting CCT-β:β-tubulin selectively kills CCT-β overexpressed cancer cells through MAPKs activation. Cell Death. 2017;8:e3052. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Roh SH, Kasembeli M, Bakthavatsalam D, Chiu W, Tweardy D. Contribution of the type II chaperonin, TRiC/CCT, to oncogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:25975. doi: 10.3390/ijms161125975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Feldman DE, Thulasiraman V, Ferreyra RG, Frydman J. Formation of the VHL–Elongin BC tumor suppressor complex is mediated by the chaperonin TRiC. Mol Cell. 1999;4:1051–61. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80233-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wells CA, Dingus J, Hildebrandt JD. Role of the chaperonin CCT/TRiC complex in G protein βγ-dimer assembly. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:20221–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602409200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Seo S, Baye LM, Schulz NP, Beck JS, Zhang Q, Slusarski DC, et al. BBS6, BBS10, and BBS12 form a complex with CCT/TRiC family chaperonins and mediate BBSome assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:1488. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910268107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Antonova SV, Haffke M, Corradini E, Mikuciunas M, Low TY, Signor L, et al. Chaperonin CCT checkpoint function in basal transcription factor TFIID assembly. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018;25:1119–27. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0156-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaisari S, Sitry-Shevah D, Miniowitz-Shemtov S, Teichner A, Hershko A. Role of CCT chaperonin in the disassembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:956–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620451114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stoldt V, Rademacher F, Kehren V, Ernst JF, Pearce DA, Sherman F. Review: The cet eukaryotic chaperonin subunits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other yeasts. Yeast. 1996;12:523–9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199605)12:6<523::AID-YEA962>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hodeify R, Nandakumar M, Own M, Courjaret RJ, Graumann J, Hubrack SZ, et al. The CCT chaperonin is a novel regulator of Ca2 + signaling through modulation of Orai1 trafficking. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaau1935. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau1935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lundin VF, Srayko M, Hyman AA, Leroux MR. Efficient chaperone-mediated tubulin biogenesis is essential for cell division and cell migration in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2008;313:320–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pavel M, Imarisio S, Menzies FM, Jimenez-Sanchez M, Siddiqi FH, Wu X, et al. CCT complex restricts neuropathogenic protein aggregation via autophagy. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13821. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Noormohammadi A, Khodakarami A, Gutierrez-Garcia R, Lee HJ, Koyuncu S, König T, et al. Somatic increase of CCT8 mimics proteostasis of human pluripotent stem cells and extends C. elegans lifespan. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13649. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Berger J, Berger S, Li M, Jacoby AS, Arner A, Bavi N, et al. In vivo function of the chaperonin TRiC in alpha-actin folding during sarcomere assembly. Cell Rep. 2018;22:313–22. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jaeger K, Sukseree S, Zhong S, Phinney BS, Mlitz V, Buchberger M, et al. Cornification of nail keratinocytes requires autophagy for bulk degradation of intracellular proteins while sparing components of the cytoskeleton. Apoptosis. 2018;24:62–73. doi: 10.1007/s10495-018-1505-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vinayagam A, Kulkarni MM, Sopko R, Sun X, Hu Y, Nand A, et al. An integrative analysis of the InR/PI3K/Akt network identifies the dynamic response to insulin signaling. Cell Rep. 2016;16:3062–74. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Abe Y, Yoon SO, Kubota K, Mendoza MC, Gygi SP, Blenis J. p90 ribosomal S6 kinase and p70 ribosomal S6 kinase link phosphorylation of the eukaryotic chaperonin containing TCP-1 to growth factor, insulin, and nutrient signaling. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:14939–48. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900097200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu XQ, Lin CY, Lei M, Yan S, Zhou TH, Erikson RL. CCT chaperonin complex is required for the biogenesis of functional Plk1. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:4993–5010. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.12.4993-5010.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Spiess C, Meyer AS, Reissmann S, Frydman J. Mechanism of the eukaryotic chaperonin: protein folding in the chamber of secrets. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:598–604. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stowers RS, Schwarz TL. A genetic method for generating Drosophila eyes composed exclusively of mitotic clones of a single genotype. Genetics. 1999;152:1631–9. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ready DF, Hanson TE, Benzer S. Development of the Drosophila retina, a neurocrystalline lattice. Dev Biol. 1976;53:217–40. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90225-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang H, Stallock JP, Ng JC, Reinhard C, Neufeld TP. Regulation of cellular growth by the Drosophila target of rapamycin dTOR. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2712–24. doi: 10.1101/gad.835000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Won KA, Schumacher RJ, Farr GW, Horwich AL, Reed SI. Maturation of human cyclin E requires the function of eukaryotic chaperonin CCT. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:7584–9. doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.12.7584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Edgar BA. From cell structure to transcription: Hippo forges a new path. Cell. 2006;124:267–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Prober DA, Edgar BA. Ras1 promotes cellular growth in the Drosophila wing. Cell. 2000;100:435–46. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80679-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Karim FD, Rubin GM. Ectopic expression of activated Ras1 induces hyperplastic growth and increased cell death in Drosophila imaginal tissues. Development. 1998;125:1. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Manning BD, Toker A. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating the network. Cell. 2017;169:381–405. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kockel L, Kerr KS, Melnick M, Brückner K, Hebrok M, Perrimon N. Dynamic switch of negative feedback regulation in Drosophila Akt–TOR signaling. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hsu YC, Chern JJ, Cai Y, Liu M, Choi KW. Drosophila TCTP is essential for growth and proliferation through regulation of dRheb GTPase. Nature. 2007;445:785. doi: 10.1038/nature05528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stocker H, Radimerski T, Schindelholz B, Wittwer F, Belawat P, Daram P, et al. Rheb is an essential regulator of S6K in controlling cell growth in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:559. doi: 10.1038/ncb995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jeong JY, Yim HS, Ryu JY, Lee HS, Lee JH, Seen DS, et al. One-step sequence- and ligation-independent cloning as a rapid and versatile cloning method for functional genomics studies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:5440–3. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00844-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bateman JR, Lee AM, Wu Ct. Site-specific transformation of Drosophila via φC31 Integrase-mediated cassette exchange. Genetics. 2006;173:769–77. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.056945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Housden BE, Valvezan AJ, Kelley C, Sopko R, Hu Y, Roesel C, et al. Identification of potential drug targets for tuberous sclerosis complex by synthetic screens combining CRISPR-based knockouts with RNAi. Sci Signal. 2015;8:rs9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aab3729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tang HW, Hu Y, Chen CL, Xia B, Zirin J, Yuan M, et al. The TORC1-regulated CPA complex rewires an RNA processing network to drive autophagy and metabolic reprogramming. Cell Metab. 2018;27:1040–54.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ramadan N, Flockhart I, Booker M, Perrimon N, Mathey-Prevot B. Design and implementation of high-throughput RNAi screens in cultured Drosophila cells. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:2245. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hu Y, Sopko R, Foos M, Kelley C, Flockhart I, Ammeux N, et al. FlyPrimerBank: an online database for Drosophila melanogaster gene expression analysis and knockdown evaluation of RNAi reagents. G3. 2013;3:1607. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.007021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Le TP, Vuong LT, Kim AR, Hsu YC, Choi KW. 14-3-3 proteins regulate Tctp-Rheb interaction for organ growth in Drosophila. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11501. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim W, Jang YG, Yang J, Chung J. Spatial activation of TORC1 is regulated by Hedgehog and E2F1 signaling in the Drosophila eye. Dev Cell. 2017;42:363–75 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tsokanos FF, Albert MA, Demetriades C, Spirohn K, Boutros M, Teleman AA. eIF4A inactivates TORC1 in response to amino acid starvation. EMBO J. 2016;35:1058–76. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nagy P, Kárpáti M, et al. Atg17/FIP200 localizes to perilysosomal Ref(2)P aggregates and promotes autophagy by activation of Atg1 in Drosophila. Autophagy. 2014;10:453–67. doi: 10.4161/auto.27442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.