Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards
. 1979 Jul-Aug;84(4):319–326. doi: 10.6028/jres.084.015

A Class of Double Integrals Involving Gaussian and Trigonometric Factors

D M Fradkin 1
PMCID: PMC6756194  PMID: 34880522

Abstract

The five parameter double integral 0dyexp(p2y2)sin(βy+θ) times 0ydxexp(x2)cos(ϵβx+ϕ) is evaluated in terms of Fourier transforms of exp(− x2)erfc(αx). Some new expressions for these transforms are obtained.

Keywords: Definite integrals, double integrals, error functions, Fourier transforms, radiation reaction

1. Introduction

The five parameter definite double integral considered in this paper is a generalization of that encountered in describing the radiation reaction effects on a charged particle swept over by a single plane laser pulse. The electric field for such a pulse can be described by the function

E(u)=E°exp(u2/D2)sin(u/λ)

where u=ctk^x, k^ being the direction normal to the plane wave.

The integral encountered is

M=dξE(ξ)ξE(η)E(η)dη

which in the notation of this paper may be expressed as

M=1/2D2(E°E°)E°[I(1/2,2κ,0;0,0)I(1/2,2κ,0;2,0)]

and evaluated to yield1

M=1/2D2(E°E°)E°[exp(κ2)erfi(2κ/3)1/2exp(3κ2)erf(22κ/3)]

where κ = D/(2λ).

The five parameter definite double integral containing Gaussian and trigometric factors, discussed in this paper is

I(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)odyexp(p2y2)sin(βy+θ)0ydxexp(x2)cos(ϵβx+ϕ) (1)

where p > 0, β ≥ 0, and ϵ ≥ 0. A somewhat related indefinite double integral, containing only Gaussian factors, has previously been discussed by Rosser [3]. It will be shown that I(p, β, θ; ϵ, ϕ) may be evaluated in terms of Fourier transforms of Gaussian weighted erfc functions. The relevant Fourier sine transforms are available in closed form. Closed form expressions of such Fourier cosine transforms also exist for special cases, and integral forms convenient for numerical evaluation may be developed for the general case. The necessary Fourier transforms are discussed in the next section.

2. Fourier Transforms of exp(−x2)erfc(αx)

The Fourier sine transform, for α ≥ 0,

Fs(2β,α)0sin(2βx)exp(x2)erfc(αx)dx (2)

may be obtained from the formula given by Ng and Geller [4], p. 155, 3.5 (33), which may be put in the form

Fs(2β,α)=π2exp(β2){erfi[β]erfi[βα(α2+1)1/2}. (3)

For α < 0, one may use the relation

erfc(x)=2erfc(0)erfc(x) (4)

to obtain the Fourier sine transform connection

Fs(2β,|α|)=2Fs(2β,0)Fs(2β,|α|). (5)

The analogous Fourier consine transform, for α ≥ 0, is defined here as

Fc(2β,α)0cos(2βx)exp(x2)erfc(αx)dx. (6)

Two closed form special cases of this are

Fc(2β,0)=(π/2)exp(β2) (7)

and

Fc(0,α)=(π)1/2arctan(α1). (8)

This latter equation follows from reference [1], p. 7, 4.3(2). We shall demonstrate that for the general case, the Fourier cosine transform may be written as

Fc(2β,α)=exp(β2)[(π)1/2arctan(α1)+α0β(1+α2)1/2exp(α2x2)erfi(x)dx] (9)

or alternatively

Fc(2β,α)=α(π)1/2exp[β2(1+α2)1]times01[z2+α2)1exp[β2z2(1+α2)1]dz. (10)

These forms may be convenient for numerical evaluation when closed form expressions are not feasible. For α = 1, the integral in eq (9) may be evaluated (see reference [1], p. 7, 4.3(1)) to give the additional closed form special case

Fc(2β,1)=(π/4)exp(β2){1+2[erfi(β/2)]2}. (11)

The general expressions given in eqs (9) and (10) may be established starting from the formula given by Erdélyi [2], p. 307:

0x2ncos(2βx)erfc(αx)dx=Γ(n+1)π(2n+1)α2n+12F2(n+1,n+1/2;n+3/2,1/2;β2α2)=12α2n+1k=0Γ(k+n+1)(k+n+1/2)Γ(k+1/2)k!(β2/α2)k.

It then follows using the series expansion for exp(−x2) that

Fc(2β,α)=j=0(1)jj!2α2j+1k=0Γ(k+j+1)(k+j+1/2)Γ(k+1/2)k!(β2/α2)k.

Reversing the order of summation and employing the series representation of the hypergeometric function, it follows that

Fc(2β,α)=12αk=0(β2/α2)kΓ(k+3/2)2F1(k+1/2,k+1;k+3/2;1/α2).

Now, substituting the integral expression of reference [5] p. 114,

2F1(k+1/2,k+1;k+3/2;1/α2)=Γ(k+3/2)k!Γ(1/2)01tk(1t)1/2(1+t/α2)k1/2dt,

and summing the geometric series, one obtains

Fc(2β,α)=12απ01eβ2t(α2+t)1(1t)1/2(1+t2/α2)1/2dt.

From this, the formula quoted in eq (10) follows immediately upon change of the integration variable from t to z (using the positive square root branch for z) via

(1+t2/α2)=(1+α2)/(z2+α2).

The integral in eq (10), of the form

Tα(ξ)01eξ2z2(1+α2)1(z2+α2)1dz

satisfies the differential equation

ddξeξ2α2(1+α2)1Tα(ξ)=π(1+α2)1/2eξ2α2(1+α2)1erfi[ξ(1+α2)1/2].

Hence, integrating this equation with respect to ξ over the range (0, β), recognizing that Tα(0) = α−1 arctan(α−1), and setting ξ = (1 + α2)1/2x, one finds that the expression given in eq (10) may be written in the equivalent form displayed in eq (9).

For negative α, analogously to eq (5), the Fourier cosine transform connection is

Fc(2β,|α|)=2Fc(2β,0)Fc(2β,|α|). (12)

3. Evaluation of I(p, β, θ; ϵ, ϕ)

The five parameter definite double integral defined in eq (1) will now be evaluated in terms of the Fourier transforms discussed in the previous section. Results are quoted in eqs (15), (17), and (18). The results for the special case β = 0 are given in eq (19), while the results for the limiting case ϵβ → γ as β → 0 are presented in (eqs 2122).

We begin the derivation of the results by transforming the domain of the double integral using the general relation

0dξ0dηh(ξ,η)=0dy0ydxh(yx,x),

which may easily be established using the variable changes ξ + ηy, ηx. Consequently, it follows that

0dy0ydxh(y,x)=0dy0dxh(y+x,x). (13)

Employing this relation, we may write I(p, β, θ; ϵ, ϕ) in the form

2I(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=Im{0dy0dxep2(y+x)2ex2ei[β(y+x+ϵx)+θ+ϕ]+0dy0dxep2(y+x)2ex2ei[β(y+xϵx)+θϕ]}.

At this point, β will be restricted to values greater than zero. [The special case β = 0 will be discussed later.]

In analogy with Jones and Klein [6, p. 3], we use a Dirac δ-function to write the double integrals as triple integrals.

2I(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=Im{ei(θ+ϕ)dteiβt0dy0dxep2(y+x)2ex2δ[ty(1+ϵ)x]+ei(θϕ)dteiβt0dy0dxep2(y+x)2ex2δ[ty(1ϵ)x]}.

Doing the integration over y first and noting that y ≥ 0 in the range of integration, we obtain

2I(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=Jm{ei(θ+ϕ)dteiβt0dxep2(tϵx)2ex2Θ[t(1+ϵ)x]+ei(θϕ)dteiβt0dxep2(t+ϵx)2ex2Θ[t(1ϵ)x]}

where the step function Θ(z) is defined as unity for z ≥ 0 and zero for z < 0. The presence of the step function restricts the relevant range of integration for the variables t and x in the following fashion. In the first of the preceding integrals, the step function requires that (1 + ϵ)xt, so since x must be ≥ 0, it follows that t ≥ 0. Consequently, in that integral the ranges are

0t<  and  0x(1+ϵ)1t.

In the second of the preceding integrals, the step function requires that (1 − ϵ)xt. Thus:

  1. if ϵ < 1, then 0x(1ϵ)1t and 0 ≤ t < ,

  2. if ϵ = 1, then 0 ≤ t < and 0 ≤ x < ,

  3. if ϵ > 1, >xmax{(ϵ1)1t,0}  and  <t<..

It is useful to define the positive quantity

μ(1+ϵ2p2)1/2. (14)

For convenience, in the first of the preceding integrals we change variables from (t, x) to (z, ξ) defined by

z=(p/μ)t, ξ=μxϵpz

so that the appropriate range in the first integral becomes

0z<, ϵpzξ<[1ϵp2(1+ϵ)p]z.

Similarly, in the second of the preceding integrals, variables are changed from (t, x) to (z, ξ) now defined by

z=(p/μ)t, ξ=μx+ϵpz

so that appropriate ranges for the second integral for the various cases becomes

  1. if ϵ < 1, then 0 ≤ z < ∞, 0z<,ϵpzξ[1+ϵp2(1ϵ)p]z,

  2. if ϵ = 1, then 0 ≤ z < , epzξ < ,

  3. if ϵ > 1, then − < z < , <z<,max{(1+ϵp2)(ϵ1)pz,ϵpz}ξ<.

Making these substitutions in the preceding integrals we find

2pI(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=Jm{ei(θ+ϕ)odzei(βμ/p)zez2ϵpz[1ϵ2(1+ϵ)p]zdξeξ2+ei(θϕ)Edzei(βμ/p)zez2A(z)B(z)dξeξ2}

where

  1. if ϵ < 1, then E = 0, A(z) = ϵpz, E=0,A(z)=ϵpz,B(z)=[1+ϵp2(1ϵ)p]z,

  2. if ϵ = 1, then E = 0, A(z) = ϵpz, B(z) = ,

  3. if ϵ > 1, then E = −∞, A(z)=max{(1+ϵp2)(ϵ1)pz,ϵpz},B(z)=..

From the definition of the erfc function and eq (4), it follows that

  1. for 0 ≤ ϵ < 1, μ = (1 + ϵ2p2)1/2:

4π1/2pI(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=Jm{ei(θ+ϕ)0dzei(βμ/p)zez2[2erfc(0)erfc(ϵpz)erfc((1ϵp2)(1+ϵ)pZ)]+ei(θϕ)0dzei(βμ/p)zez2[erfc(ϵpz)erfc((1+ϵp2)(1ϵ)pz)]};
  1. for ϵ = 1, μ = (1 + p2)1/2:

4π1/2pI(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=Jm{ei(θ+ϕ)0dzei(βμ/p)zez2[2erfc(0)erfc(pz)erfc((1p2)2pz)]+ei(θϕ)0dzei(βμ/p)zez2erfc(pz)};
  1. for ϵ > 1, μ = (1 + ϵ2p2)1/2:

2pI(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=Jm{ei(θ+ϕ)0dzei(βμ/p)zez2[2erfc(0)erfc(ϵpz)erfc((1ϵp2)(1+ϵ)pz)]+ei(θϕ)0dzei(βμ/p)zez2erfc((1+ϵp2)(ϵ1)pz)+ei(θϕ)0dzei(βμ/p)zez2erfc(ϵpz)}.

Using the definitions of the Fourier transforms Fc and Fs given in the previous section, these results may be put in the form:

  1. for 0 ≤ ϵ < 1, μ = (1 + ϵ2p2)1/2;

2pI(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)==sin(θ+ϕ)[2Fc(βμ/p,0)Fc(βμ/p,1ϵp2(1+ϵ)p)]+cos(θ+ϕ)[2Fs(βμ/p,0)Fs(βμ/p,1ϵp2(1+ϵ)p)]sin(θϕ)Fc(βμ/p,1+ϵp2(1ϵ)p)cos(θϕ)Fs(βμ/p,1+ϵp2(1ϵ)p)+2sin(ϕ)[cos(θ)Fc(βμ/p,ϵp)+sin(θ)Fs(βμ/p,ϵp)]. (15)

[Note: The Fourier transforms have been defined for non-negative values of their second arguments. When (1− ϵp2) < 0, the above expressions may be used by replacing

2F(βμ/p,0)F(βμ/p,1ϵp2(1+ϵ)p)=F(βμ/p,ϵp21(1+ϵ)p), (16)

where F represents either the cosine or the sine transform. This replacement follows from eqs (5) and (12).]

  1. for ϵ = 1, μ = (1 + p2)1/2;

4π1/2pI(p,β,θ;1,ϕ)=sin(θ+ϕ)[2Fc(βμ/p,0)Fc(βμ/p,1p22p)]+cos(θ+ϕ)[2Fs(βμ/p,0)Fs(βμ/p,1p22p)]+2sin(ϕ)[cos(θ)Fc(βμ/p,p)+sin(θ)Fs(βμ/p,p)]. (17)

Again, for 1 − p2 < 0, the above expressions may be used if we make the replacement given in eq (16) with ϵ = 1.

  1. for ϵ > 1, μ = (1 + ϵ2p2)1/2;

4π1/2pI(p,β,θ;1,ϕ)=sin(θ+ϕ)[2Fc(βμ/p,0)Fc(βμ/p,1p2(1+)p)]+cos(θ+ϕ)[2Fs(βμ/p,0)Fs(βμ/p,1p2(1+)p)]+sin(θϕ)Fc(βμ/p,1+ϵp2(ϵ1)p)cos(θϕ)Fs(βμ/p,1+ϵp2(ϵ1)p)+2sin(ϕ)[cos(θ)Fc(βμ/p,ϵp)+sin(θ)Fs(βμ/p,ϵp)] (18)

Here, when 1 − ϵp2 < 0, the replacement given in eq (16) should be made.

The various results given for I(p, β, θ; ϵ, ϕ) are continuous for ϵ = 1. Using the fact that Fc(β, x) → 0 and Fs(β, x) → 0 as x, we may readily verify that

limϵ1I(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=I(p,β,θ;1,ϕ)

and

limϵ1+I(p,β,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=I(p,β,θ;1,ϕ)

For the special case β = 0, one obtains directly from the definition of the double integral under discussion,

I(p,0,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=0dy0ydxexp(p2y2)exp(x2)sinθsinϕ=sinθcosϕ0dyexp(p2y2)[erfc(0)erfc(y)]=π(2p)1sinθcosϕ[Fc(0,0)Fc(0,1/p)].

Thus, it follows using the specific values of the transforms,

I(p,0,θ;ϵ,ϕ)=(4p)1sinθcosϕ[π2arctan(p)]=(2p)1sinθcosϕarctan(1/p). (19)

This result also follows by a limiting process β → 0 in the results quoted in eqs (1518) upon application of the relation for positive arguments

arctan(x)+arctan(1/x)=π/2,

and the identities (for ϵ ≥ 0, p > 0):

arctan(ϵp)±arctan(p)=±arctan[(1±ϵ)p1p2]  for  1ϵp2>0,

and

arctan(1p)±arctan(1ϵp)=±arctan[(1±ϵ)pϵp21]  for  ϵp21>0.

[The inequivalent forms corresponding to the two upper signs are necessitated by the arctangent’s definition which requires π/2 ≤ arctan(x) ≤ π/2.]

Finally, the particular double integral

H(γ,p,ϕ)0dy0ydxexp(p2y2)exp(x2)cos(γx+ϕ),γ0 (20)

may most easily be evaluated by integration by parts:

H(γ,p,ϕ)=-(1 / p)y=0[derfc(y)]x=0y/pdx exp(x2)cos(γx+ϕ)=π(2p)1[(cosϕ)Fc(γ,p)(sinϕ)Fs(γ,p)]. (21)

This result also follows directly from Eq (18) by the following limit process:

H(γ,p,ϕ)=limβ0+I(p,β,π/2;γ/β,ϕ). (22)

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Professor N. Kemmer for his hospitality at the University of Edinburgh where this work was initiated during a sabbatical leave.

Footnotes

*

Invited paper.

1

The normalization adopted for the erf, erfc, and erfi functions in this paper is the same as that employed in references [1] and [2]. Figures in brackets indicate literature references at the end of this paper.

4. References

  • [1].Ng E. W. and Geller M., A Table of Integrals of the Error Functions, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) 73B (Math. Sci.), No. 1, 1–20 (Jan.–Mar. 1969). [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Erdéyli A., Magnus W., Oberhettinger F., and Tricomi F. G., Table of Integral Transforms, Vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York: 1954). [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Rosser J. B., The Theory and Application of 0zexp(x2)dx and 0zexp(p2y2)dy0yexp(x2)dx, (Mapleton House, Brooklyn, N.Y. 1948). [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Ng E. W. and Geller M., A Table of Integrals of the Error Function. II. Additions and Corrections, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) 75B (Math. Sci.), Nos. 3 and 4, 149–163 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Erdéyli A., Magnus W., Oberhettinger F., and Tricomi F. G., Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. 1 (McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc., New York: 1953). [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Jones D. S. and Klein M., Asymptotic Expansion of Multiple Integrals and the Method of Stationary Phase, J. Math, and Physics (MIT), 37, 1–28 (1958). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES