Abstract
The five parameter double integral times is evaluated in terms of Fourier transforms of exp(− x2)erfc(αx). Some new expressions for these transforms are obtained.
Keywords: Definite integrals, double integrals, error functions, Fourier transforms, radiation reaction
1. Introduction
The five parameter definite double integral considered in this paper is a generalization of that encountered in describing the radiation reaction effects on a charged particle swept over by a single plane laser pulse. The electric field for such a pulse can be described by the function
where , being the direction normal to the plane wave.
The integral encountered is
which in the notation of this paper may be expressed as
and evaluated to yield1
where κ = D/(2λ).
The five parameter definite double integral containing Gaussian and trigometric factors, discussed in this paper is
| (1) |
where p > 0, β ≥ 0, and ϵ ≥ 0. A somewhat related indefinite double integral, containing only Gaussian factors, has previously been discussed by Rosser [3]. It will be shown that I(p, β, θ; ϵ, ϕ) may be evaluated in terms of Fourier transforms of Gaussian weighted erfc functions. The relevant Fourier sine transforms are available in closed form. Closed form expressions of such Fourier cosine transforms also exist for special cases, and integral forms convenient for numerical evaluation may be developed for the general case. The necessary Fourier transforms are discussed in the next section.
2. Fourier Transforms of exp(−x2)erfc(αx)
The Fourier sine transform, for α ≥ 0,
| (2) |
may be obtained from the formula given by Ng and Geller [4], p. 155, 3.5 (33), which may be put in the form
| (3) |
For α < 0, one may use the relation
| (4) |
to obtain the Fourier sine transform connection
| (5) |
The analogous Fourier consine transform, for α ≥ 0, is defined here as
| (6) |
Two closed form special cases of this are
| (7) |
and
| (8) |
This latter equation follows from reference [1], p. 7, 4.3(2). We shall demonstrate that for the general case, the Fourier cosine transform may be written as
| (9) |
or alternatively
| (10) |
These forms may be convenient for numerical evaluation when closed form expressions are not feasible. For α = 1, the integral in eq (9) may be evaluated (see reference [1], p. 7, 4.3(1)) to give the additional closed form special case
| (11) |
The general expressions given in eqs (9) and (10) may be established starting from the formula given by Erdélyi [2], p. 307:
It then follows using the series expansion for exp(−x2) that
Reversing the order of summation and employing the series representation of the hypergeometric function, it follows that
Now, substituting the integral expression of reference [5] p. 114,
and summing the geometric series, one obtains
From this, the formula quoted in eq (10) follows immediately upon change of the integration variable from t to z (using the positive square root branch for z) via
The integral in eq (10), of the form
satisfies the differential equation
Hence, integrating this equation with respect to ξ over the range (0, β), recognizing that Tα(0) = α−1 arctan(α−1), and setting ξ = (1 + α2)1/2x, one finds that the expression given in eq (10) may be written in the equivalent form displayed in eq (9).
For negative α, analogously to eq (5), the Fourier cosine transform connection is
| (12) |
3. Evaluation of I(p, β, θ; ϵ, ϕ)
The five parameter definite double integral defined in eq (1) will now be evaluated in terms of the Fourier transforms discussed in the previous section. Results are quoted in eqs (15), (17), and (18). The results for the special case β = 0 are given in eq (19), while the results for the limiting case ϵβ → γ as β → 0 are presented in (eqs 21–22).
We begin the derivation of the results by transforming the domain of the double integral using the general relation
which may easily be established using the variable changes ξ + η → y, η → x. Consequently, it follows that
| (13) |
Employing this relation, we may write I(p, β, θ; ϵ, ϕ) in the form
At this point, β will be restricted to values greater than zero. [The special case β = 0 will be discussed later.]
In analogy with Jones and Klein [6, p. 3], we use a Dirac δ-function to write the double integrals as triple integrals.
Doing the integration over y first and noting that y ≥ 0 in the range of integration, we obtain
where the step function Θ(z) is defined as unity for z ≥ 0 and zero for z < 0. The presence of the step function restricts the relevant range of integration for the variables t and x in the following fashion. In the first of the preceding integrals, the step function requires that (1 + ϵ)x ≤ t, so since x must be ≥ 0, it follows that t ≥ 0. Consequently, in that integral the ranges are
In the second of the preceding integrals, the step function requires that (1 − ϵ)x ≤ t. Thus:
if ϵ < 1, then and 0 ≤ t < ∞,
if ϵ = 1, then 0 ≤ t < ∞ and 0 ≤ x < ∞,
if ϵ > 1, .
It is useful to define the positive quantity
| (14) |
For convenience, in the first of the preceding integrals we change variables from (t, x) to (z, ξ) defined by
so that the appropriate range in the first integral becomes
Similarly, in the second of the preceding integrals, variables are changed from (t, x) to (z, ξ) now defined by
so that appropriate ranges for the second integral for the various cases becomes
if ϵ < 1, then 0 ≤ z < ∞,
if ϵ = 1, then 0 ≤ z < ∞, epz ≤ ξ < ∞,
if ϵ > 1, then −∞ < z < ∞,
Making these substitutions in the preceding integrals we find
where
if ϵ < 1, then E = 0, A(z) = ϵpz,
if ϵ = 1, then E = 0, A(z) = ϵpz, B(z) = ∞,
if ϵ > 1, then E = −∞, .
From the definition of the erfc function and eq (4), it follows that
for 0 ≤ ϵ < 1, μ = (1 + ϵ2p2)1/2:
for ϵ = 1, μ = (1 + p2)1/2:
for ϵ > 1, μ = (1 + ϵ2p2)1/2:
Using the definitions of the Fourier transforms Fc and Fs given in the previous section, these results may be put in the form:
for 0 ≤ ϵ < 1, μ = (1 + ϵ2p2)1/2;
| (15) |
[Note: The Fourier transforms have been defined for non-negative values of their second arguments. When (1− ϵp2) < 0, the above expressions may be used by replacing
| (16) |
where F represents either the cosine or the sine transform. This replacement follows from eqs (5) and (12).]
for ϵ = 1, μ = (1 + p2)1/2;
| (17) |
Again, for 1 − p2 < 0, the above expressions may be used if we make the replacement given in eq (16) with ϵ = 1.
for ϵ > 1, μ = (1 + ϵ2p2)1/2;
| (18) |
Here, when 1 − ϵp2 < 0, the replacement given in eq (16) should be made.
The various results given for I(p, β, θ; ϵ, ϕ) are continuous for ϵ = 1. Using the fact that Fc(β, x) → 0 and Fs(β, x) → 0 as x → ∞, we may readily verify that
and
For the special case β = 0, one obtains directly from the definition of the double integral under discussion,
Thus, it follows using the specific values of the transforms,
| (19) |
This result also follows by a limiting process β → 0 in the results quoted in eqs (15–18) upon application of the relation for positive arguments
and the identities (for ϵ ≥ 0, p > 0):
and
[The inequivalent forms corresponding to the two upper signs are necessitated by the arctangent’s definition which requires π/2 ≤ arctan(x) ≤ π/2.]
Finally, the particular double integral
| (20) |
may most easily be evaluated by integration by parts:
| (21) |
This result also follows directly from Eq (18) by the following limit process:
| (22) |
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Professor N. Kemmer for his hospitality at the University of Edinburgh where this work was initiated during a sabbatical leave.
Footnotes
4. References
- [1].Ng E. W. and Geller M., A Table of Integrals of the Error Functions, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) 73B (Math. Sci.), No. 1, 1–20 (Jan.–Mar. 1969). [Google Scholar]
- [2].Erdéyli A., Magnus W., Oberhettinger F., and Tricomi F. G., Table of Integral Transforms, Vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York: 1954). [Google Scholar]
- [3].Rosser J. B., The Theory and Application of and , (Mapleton House, Brooklyn, N.Y. 1948). [Google Scholar]
- [4].Ng E. W. and Geller M., A Table of Integrals of the Error Function. II. Additions and Corrections, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) 75B (Math. Sci.), Nos. 3 and 4, 149–163 (1971). [Google Scholar]
- [5].Erdéyli A., Magnus W., Oberhettinger F., and Tricomi F. G., Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. 1 (McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc., New York: 1953). [Google Scholar]
- [6].Jones D. S. and Klein M., Asymptotic Expansion of Multiple Integrals and the Method of Stationary Phase, J. Math, and Physics (MIT), 37, 1–28 (1958). [Google Scholar]
