Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2019 Jul 8;141(29):11409–11413. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b05432

Anion Pairs Template a Trigonal Prism with Disilver Vertices

John P Carpenter 1, Charlie T McTernan 1, Tanya K Ronson 1, Jonathan R Nitschke 1,*
PMCID: PMC6756586  PMID: 31282153

Abstract

graphic file with name ja9b05432_0004.jpg

Here we describe the formation of a trigonal prismatic cage, utilizing 2-formyl-1,8-naphthyridine subcomponents to bind pairs of silver(I) ions in close proximity. This cage is the first example of a new class of subcomponent self-assembled polyhedral structures having bimetallic vertices, as opposed to the single metal centers that typically serve as structural elements within such cages. Our new cage self-assembles around a pair of anionic templates, which are shown by crystallographic and solution-phase data to bind within the central cavity of the structure. Many different anions serve as competent templates and guests. Elongated dianions, such as the strong oxidizing agent peroxysulfate, also serve to template and bind within the cavity of the prism. The principle of using subcomponents that have more than one spatially close, but nonchelating, binding site may thus allow access to other higher-order structures with multimetallic vertices.

Self-assembly allows the efficient construction of complex architectures from relatively simple components. Polyhedral metal–organic cages are a class of such architectures that have been the focus of intense recent work.1−3

Much effort has gone into the design of multitopic organic ligands for these cages. The symmetries and connection properties of these ligands and their metal-ion partners (typically octahedral4,5 or square planar6,7 transition metals) can be used to create structures with diverse functions.8,9

A key feature of these cages is the presence of an internal cavity of well-defined shape, size, and charge density. These cavities may offer chemical environments distinct from that of the bulk solvent. They have thus found applications in areas such as molecular sequestration,10−12 chiral sensing,13 and the stabilization of reactive species14 and reaction intermediates.15,16

Novel architectures and functions can be obtained through the use of flexible organic building blocks.17,18 Many systems that incorporate such species form unexpected and often structurally complex architectures, including a range of intricate cages and grids,19−21 which have been used for catalysis,22 guest binding,23 and molecular knot formation.24,25

We hypothesized that novel coordination motifs could be used in an analogous way to these flexible ligands. Complexes that contain two metal ions in close proximity are an area of active interest, particularly in catalysis.26,27 Such bimetallic complexes can adopt a variety of configurations, displaying features such as anion inclusion,28 the incorporation of different numbers of ligands,29 or metal–metal bonding.30

We reasoned that the nonconverging coordination vectors of commercially available 2-formyl-1,8-naphthyridine,31,32 along with the flexible coordination sphere of silver(I),33−35 could lead to the formation of architectures with unprecedented geometries. Here, we report the preparation of a AgI12L6 trigonal prism using the subcomponent self-assembly approach.36,37 This structure makes use of bimetallic units to define the vertices of a three-dimensional metal–organic structure, opening the door to further investigation of new polyhedral architectures in this class of compounds. It is also the first example of this type of prismatoid constructed with 3-fold symmetric building blocks, to the best of our knowledge.

The reaction of tris(4-aminophenyl)amine A (6 equiv) and 2-formyl-1,8-naphthyridine B (12 equiv) with silver(I) perchlorate (ClO4–, 12 equiv) yielded AgI12L6 cage 1 (Figure 1), whose composition was confirmed by both ESI- and HR-MS (Figures S8 and S9). 1H NMR spectroscopy revealed 28 signals, consistent with a distinct environment for each ligand arm, with two of the phenyl rings undergoing rapid rotation on the NMR time scale (Figure 2c).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Synthesis of AgI12L6 trigonal prism 1 from tris(4-aminophenyl)amine A, 2-formyl-1,8-naphthyridine B, and silver(I) perchlorate. (b) Assembly of 1 requires an appropriate template anion. (c) X-ray crystal structure of (ClO4–)2⊂1 with the two templating anions included. One pair of ligands is shown in gray to highlight the desymmetrization of the ligand arms. (d) Top-down view depicting the central tubular void of (ClO4–)2⊂1. Disorder, nonincluded anions, and solvent molecules have been omitted for clarity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) One vertex of (ClO4–)2⊂1. (b) Simplified representation of the same vertex. (c) 1H NMR and DOSY NMR spectra (400 MHz, 298 K, CD3CN) of (ClO4–)2⊂1 showing 3-fold desymmetrization of the cage ligands. The units of D are 10–6 cm2 s–1.

Further analysis by diffusion ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) supported the formation of a single product structure in solution, with an observed diffusion coefficient of 4.8 × 10–6 cm2 s–1, corresponding to a hydrodynamic radius of 12 Å (Figure 2c).

Vapor diffusion of diisopropyl ether (iPr2O) into an acetonitrile solution of 1 provided crystals suitable for analysis by X-ray diffraction. The cationic portion of 1 was revealed to have a twisted trigonal prismatic structure (Figure 1c,d) with a pair of silver centers at each vertex.

The vertices of the structure were observed to adopt a new mode of coordination. The two AgI cations at each vertex are coordinated by three distinct naphthyridine-imine arms from different ligands. Two of the arms bridge between AgI centers, using all three N-donors. The third naphthyridine-imine arm only coordinates to the outermost AgI center via two of its N-donors (Figure 2a). The bidentate bridging mode of the napthyridines forces the AgI centers into close proximity, with Ag···Ag distances of 2.816(2)–2.861(3) Å, within the range reported for other naphthyridine-bridged silver complexes.30,31 All AgI centers are coordinated by four nitrogen donors, with Ag–N bond lengths ranging from 2.227(5)–2.520(7) Å.

The two triangular faces of the trigonal prism, as defined by the locations of the centroids of the disilver centers of each vertex, are twisted by 30 ± 1° with respect to each other. Two tritopic ligands define each rectangular face of the prism, each bridging between three vertices (Figure 1). Two naphthyridine-imine arms of each ligand connect vertices belonging to the same triangular face, while the third arm bridges to a vertex of the opposing triangular face, through the interior of the structure. The connectivity of the structure is thus similar to a D4-symmetric CdII8L8 tetragonal prism with a larger internal cavity and single-metal vertices.38 In the present case, the overall architecture has D3 symmetry, as well as a much smaller internal cavity.

The three arms of each tritopic ligand thus experience different environments within the overall structure. Further analysis by COSY and NOESY NMR, both 1D and 2D, allowed us to unambiguously assign each of the proton environments in solution. All solution-state structural characterization data for 1 were consistent with the crystal structure (see SI Section 3).

The crystal structure revealed that the triangular prism bound a pair of ClO4– anions within its elongated cavity. Both encapsulated anions benefit from nonclassical hydrogen bonding interactions with internally directed protons of the cage, with CH···anion distances in the range 2.4–2.7 Å. Several other ClO4– anions were found to associate with the periphery of the cage. From this, we inferred that anions may play a crucial role in templating the formation of this architecture.

A series of experiments was carried out to further probe the scope of anion templation. Silver bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (AgNTf2) was used as the silver(I) source in all cases. Following treatment of this salt with subcomponents A and B, it was found that no well-defined structure formed in the absence of a competent template ion (Figure S58), even after heating the mixture to 60 °C in an inert atmosphere for 3 days. Molecular modeling, starting from the crystal structure of (ClO4–)2⊂1, suggested that the cavity is too small to accommodate NTf2– anions.

Templation of (X–)2⊂1 occurred following the addition of two equivalents of trifluoromethanesulfonate (OTf –), tetrafluoroborate (BF4–), perrhenate (ReO4–), hexafluorophosphate (PF6–), ClO4–, sulfate (SO42–), or bisulfate (HSO4–) to the untemplated mixture of A, B, and AgNTf2 (SI Section 4). Cage (X–)2⊂1 also formed directly when AgPF6, AgClO4, or AgBF4 was used as the silver(I) source. AgReO4 and Ag2SO4 were not sufficiently soluble in acetonitrile to allow for the reaction to proceed.

The diffusion of diethyl ether into a solution of (OTf–)2⊂1 containing excess TBAPF6 furnished crystals of sufficient quality for analysis by X-ray diffraction, confirming formation of a AgI12L6 cage isostructural to (ClO4–)2⊂1. A clearly resolved hexafluorophosphate (PF6–) anion was observed in one internal site, while the second site contained a disordered mixture of OTf – and PF6– (65%/35% occupancy, respectively, see SI Section 8).

Crystals of (HSO4–)2⊂1 formed following the diffusion of iPr2O into a concentrated MeCN solution, and the structure was analyzed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 3a). The distance between the two encapsulated anions was found to be 4.150(2) Å, as measured between the two sulfur atoms. This value is similar to the 4.112(1) Å distance observed by Flood and co-workers, where a pair of HSO4– anions is stabilized by two cyanostar macrocycles.39,40 In the case of (ClO4–)2⊂1, the Cl···Cl distance was found to be 4.88(2) Å (Figure 3b). These results suggest that hydrogen bonding between the two HSO4– anions within the cage cavity,41 coupled with interactions between the internally directed protons of the cage and the HSO4–, facilitates close proximity between bisulfate anions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

X-ray crystal structures of (a) (HSO4–)2⊂1, (b) (ClO4–)2⊂1, (c) (PF6–)2⊂1, (d) (EDS2–)⊂1 and (e) (S2O82–)⊂1 with side-views of the isolated anionic templates.

Noting that each crystal structure obtained contained two bound anions, we next explored whether two anions were required to template the framework of 1 in solution. Titration of two equivalents of TBAHSO4 into an untemplated mixture of A, B, and AgNTf2 revealed complete formation of (HSO4–)2⊂1. Addition of further HSO4– led to no appreciable changes (Figure S58). This result, coupled with the crystallographic evidence, suggested that 1 hosts two anions within its central void in solution.

Having observed these supramolecular interactions holding anions in close proximity within 1, we questioned whether linear, covalently linked dianions could also serve as guests and templates for this host. There are few reported examples of such dianions bound inside cage structures.42,43 Addition of sodium 1,2-ethanedisulfonate (EDS2–) was found to lead to formation of the templated cage. Crystallization by diffusion of iPr2O into an MeCN solution of (EDS2–)⊂1, followed by X-ray analysis, unambiguously confirmed the formation of a 1:1 host guest complex (Figure 3d), as opposed to the 2:1 complexes described above.

We also found that the addition of potassium persulfate (S2O82–), which is known to oxidize AgI to AgII in MeCN solution,44 led to the formation of cage (S2O82–)⊂1. Diffusion of iPr2O into a solution of (S2O82–)⊂1 in MeCN produced X-ray quality crystals, which revealed a single S2O82– anion bound in the center of the cage’s cavity (Figure 3e). A sulfur–sulfur distance of 4.070(3) Å was measured, shorter than that of the hydrogen-bonded HSO4– dimer. Over the course of 27 days, changes in the 1H NMR spectrum of (S2O82–)⊂1 were observed, consistent with the formation of a new host–guest complex. We thus inferred that the S2O82– was ultimately reduced to other anionic species, which also templated the prism. The 1H NMR spectra of the resulting host–guest species did not match those templated solely by SO42– or HSO4– (see SI Section 6).

The shape and size of cage 1 was observed to adapt to accommodate the different guest anions, as evidenced in the crystallographic data. The volumes of these anions vary from 53 Å3 (for BF4–) to 85 Å3 (for OTf–).4 Measuring between the centroids of the disilver vertices, significant variations in the conformation of the cage were noted, depending on the guest. While the length of the cage did not vary (<1% change), the apertures at the ends of the cage were found to contract by up to 12 ± 2% (66.9 ± 0.3 Å2 for (EDS2–)⊂1 to 76.3 ± 0.5 Å2 for (OTf–/PF6–)2⊂1, see SI Section 9 for details).

The twist angle between the two triangular faces of the prism was also found to vary. With a twist angle of 0° defining a trigonal prism and 60° defining a trigonal antiprism, 1 varied between 27.5 ± 1.0° (for (S2O82–)⊂1) and 31 ± 0.9° (for (OTf–/PF6–)2⊂1). These twist angles indicate that the geometry of 1 is approximately halfway between an idealized trigonal prism and antiprism.

These changes in the structure of 1 are attributed to two factors: structural tuning of 1 to maximize favorable interactions with the internalized anions and crystal packing effects. Smaller anions led to a contraction of the apertures of the cage, whereas larger anions required the cage to expand to accommodate them. A greater contraction of the triangular apertures corresponds to a greater distortion of the twist angle from that of an ideal prism.

We have thus demonstrated the formation of a desymmetrized trigonal prismatic cage from bimetallic motifs using subcomponent self-assembly. The use of 2-formyl-1,8-naphthyridine allowed the formation of the disilver corners of cage 1, permitting access to this new structure type. The self-assembly process was template-driven, with either two monoanions or an elongated dianion, occupying the central, tubular cavity defined by the cage. The cage flexed and adapted in order to accommodate a broad range of anionic species, including strong oxidants. Further work will look to explore this system in aqueous media and examine the potential uses of its unusual binding pocket. New structures and structure types may also become accessible through the use of other subcomponents that contain spatially close, but nonchelating, binding sites for bimetallic motifs at the vertices of polyhedra.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Research Council (695009) and the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, EP/P027067/1). We thank the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Centre (Swansea, UK) for high resolution mass spectrometry and Diamond Light Source (UK) for synchrotron beamtime on I19 (MT15768). J.P.C. thanks the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant (642192). C.T.M. thanks the Leverhulme and Isaac Newton Trusts, and Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge for Fellowship support.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b05432.

  • Detailed descriptions of synthetic procedures; characterization of new compounds; spectroscopic data (PDF)

  • X-ray data for (OTf–/PF6–)2⊂1 (CCDC 1913634) (CIF), (ClO4–)2⊂1 (CCDC 1913631) (CIF), (HSO4–)2⊂1 (CCDC 1913633) (CIF), (EDS2–)⊂1 (CCDC 1913632) (CIF), and (S2O82–)⊂1 (CCDC 1913635) (CIF)

Author Contributions

‡ J.P.C. and C.T.M. contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ja9b05432_si_001.pdf (3.1MB, pdf)
ja9b05432_si_002.cif (6MB, cif)
ja9b05432_si_003.cif (4.8MB, cif)
ja9b05432_si_004.cif (6MB, cif)
ja9b05432_si_005.cif (9.1MB, cif)
ja9b05432_si_006.cif (5.5MB, cif)

References

  1. Chand D. K.; Biradha K.; Fujita M.; Sakamoto S.; Yamaguchi K. A Molecular Sphere of Octahedral Symmetry. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2486–2487. 10.1039/B206625B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Freye S.; Michel R.; Stalke D.; Pawliczek M.; Frauendorf H.; Clever G. H. Template Control over Dimerization and Guest Selectivity of Interpenetrated Coordination Cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8476–8479. 10.1021/ja403184a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yazaki K.; Sei Y.; Akita M.; Yoshizawa M. A Polyaromatic Molecular Tube That Binds Long Hydrocarbons with High Selectivity. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5179. 10.1038/ncomms6179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Argent S. P.; Adams H.; Riis-Johannessen T.; Jeffery J. C.; Harding L. P.; Ward M. D. High-Nuclearity Homoleptic and Heteroleptic Coordination Cages Based on Tetra-Capped Truncated Tetrahedral and Cuboctahedral Metal Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 72–73. 10.1021/ja056993o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Riddell I. A.; Hristova Y. R.; Clegg J. K.; Wood C. S.; Breiner B.; Nitschke J. R. Five Discrete Multinuclear Metal-Organic Assemblies from One Ligand: Deciphering the Effects of Different Templates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2723–2733. 10.1021/ja311285b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jansze S. M.; Wise M. D.; Vologzhanina A. V.; Scopelliti R.; Severin K. PdII2L4-Type Coordination Cages up to Three Nanometers in Size. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1901–1908. 10.1039/C6SC04732G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun Q.-F.; Sato S.; Fujita M. An M18L24 Stellated Cuboctahedron through Post-Stellation of an M12L24 Core. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 330–333. 10.1038/nchem.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Suzuki K.; Sato S.; Fujita M. Template Synthesis of Precisely Monodisperse Silica Nanoparticles within Self-Assembled Organometallic Spheres. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 25–29. 10.1038/nchem.446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yu F.; Poole D.; Mathew S.; Yan N.; Hessels J.; Orth N.; Ivanović-Burmazović I.; Reek J. N. H. Control over Electrochemical Water Oxidation Catalysis by Preorganization of Molecular Ruthenium Catalysts in Self-Assembled Nanospheres. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11247–11251. 10.1002/anie.201805244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang D.; Ronson T. K.; Mosquera J.; Martinez A.; Guy L.; Nitschke J. R. Anion Binding in Water Drives Structural Adaptation in an Azaphosphatrane-Functionalized FeII4L4 Tetrahedron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6574–6577. 10.1021/jacs.7b02950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Custelcean R.; Bonnesen P. V.; Duncan N. C.; Zhang X.; Watson L. A.; Van Berkel G.; Parson W. B.; Hay B. P. Urea-Functionalised M4L6 Cage Receptors: Anion-Templated Self-Assembly and Selective Guest Exchange in Aqueous Solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8525–8534. 10.1021/ja300677w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Custelcean R.; Bonnesen P. V.; Roach B. D.; Duncan N. C. Ion-pair triple helicates and mesocates self-assembled from ditopic 2,2’-bipyridine-bis(urea) ligands and Ni(II) or Fe(II) sulfate salts. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7438–7440. 10.1039/c2cc33062h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Albrecht M.; Isaak E.; Baumert M.; Gossen V.; Raabe G.; Fröhlich R. Induced Fit” in Chiral Recognition: Epimerization upon Dimerization in the Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Helicate-Type Titanium(IV) Complexes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2850–2853. 10.1002/anie.201006448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mal P.; Breiner B.; Rissanen K.; Nitschke J. R. White Phosphorus Is Air-Stable within a Self-Assembled Tetrahedral Capsule. Science 2009, 324, 1697–1699. 10.1126/science.1175313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cullen W.; Misuraca M. C.; Hunter C. A.; Williams N. H.; Ward M. D. Highly Efficient Catalysis of the Kemp Elimination in the Cavity of a Cubic Coordination Cage. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 231–236. 10.1038/nchem.2452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Murase T.; Nishijima Y.; Fujita M. Cage-Catalyzed Knoevenagel Condensation under Neutral Conditions in Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 162–164. 10.1021/ja210068f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rizzuto F. J.; Pröhm P.; Plajer A. J.; Greenfield J. L.; Nitschke J. R. Hydrogen-Bond-Assisted Symmetry Breaking in a Network of Chiral Metal–Organic Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1707–1715. 10.1021/jacs.8b12323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Song B.; Kandapal S.; Gu J.; Zhang K.; Reese A.; Ying Y.; Wang L.; Wang H.; Li Y.; Wang M.; Lu S.; Hao X.-Q.; Li X.; Xu B.; Li X. Self-Assembly of Polycyclic Supramolecules Using Linear Metal-Organic Ligands. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4575. 10.1038/s41467-018-07045-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hasenknopf B.; Lehn J.-M.; Boumediene N.; Dupont-Gervais A.; Van Dorsselaer A.; Kneisel B.; Fenske D. Self-Assembly of Tetra- and Hexanuclear Circular Helicates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10956–10962. 10.1021/ja971204r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hasenknopf B.; Lehn J.-M.; Kneisel B. O.; Baum G.; Fenske D. Self-Assembly of a Circular Double Helicate. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 1838–1840. 10.1002/anie.199618381. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hasenknopf B.; Lehn J.-M.; Boumediene N.; Leize E.; Van Dorsselaer A. Kinetic and Thermodynamic Control in Self-Assembly: Sequential Formation of Linear and Circular Helicates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3265–3268. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cullen W.; Metherell A. J.; Wragg A. B.; Taylor C. G. P.; Williams N. H.; Ward M. D. Catalysis in a Cationic Coordination Cage Using a Cavity-Bound Guest and Surface-Bound Anions: Inhibition, Activation, and Autocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2821–2828. 10.1021/jacs.7b11334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tidmarsh I. S.; Faust T. B.; Adams H.; Harding L. P.; Russo L.; Clegg W.; Ward M. D. Octanuclear Cubic Coordination Cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15167–15175. 10.1021/ja805605y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ayme J.-F.; Beves J. E.; Leigh D. A.; McBurney R. T.; Rissanen K.; Schultz D. A Synthetic Molecular Pentafoil Knot. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 15–20. 10.1038/nchem.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Danon J. J.; Krüger A.; Leigh D. A.; Lemonnier J.-F.; Stephens A. J.; Vitorica-Yrezabal I. J.; Woltering S. L. Braiding a Molecular Knot with Eight Crossings. Science 2017, 355, 159–162. 10.1126/science.aal1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Buchard A.; Kember M. R.; Sandeman K. G.; Williams C. K. A Bimetallic Iron(III) Catalyst for CO2/Epoxide Coupling. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 212–214. 10.1039/C0CC02205E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Desai S. P.; Ye J.; Zheng J.; Ferrandon M. S.; Webber T. E.; Platero-Prats A. E.; Duan J.; Garcia-Holley P.; Camaioni D. M.; Chapman K. W.; Delferro M.; Farha O. K.; Fulton J. L.; Gagliardi L.; Lercher J. A.; Penn R. L.; Stein A.; Lu C. C. Well-Defined Rhodium–Gallium Catalytic Sites in a Metal–Organic Framework: Promoter-Controlled Selectivity in Alkyne Semihydrogenation to E-Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15309–15318. 10.1021/jacs.8b08550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Artem’ev A. V.; Bagryanskaya I. Y.; Doronina E. P.; Tolstoy P. M.; Gushchin A. L.; Rakhmanova M. I.; Ivanov A. Y.; Suturina A. O. A New Family of Clusters Containing a Silver-Centered Tetracapped [Ag@Ag4(μ3-P)4] Tetrahedron, Inscribed within a N12 Icosahedron. Dalton. Trans. 2017, 46, 12425–12429. 10.1039/C7DT02597A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schenck T. G.; Downes J. M.; Milne C. R. C.; Mackenzie P. B.; Boucher T. G.; Whelan J.; Bosnich B. Bimetallic Reactivity. Synthesis of Bimetallic Complexes Containing a Bis(Phosphino)Pyrazole Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 2334–2337. 10.1021/ic00209a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sowa T.; Kawamura T.; Shida T.; Yonezawa T. Electronic Structure of the Rhodium-Rhodium Bond in Dirhodium Tetracarboxylates by a Study of Electronic Spectra of Neutral Molecules and Their Cation Radicals. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 56–61. 10.1021/ic00143a014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bera J. K.; Sadhukhan N.; Majumdar M. 1,8-Naphthyridine Revisited: Applications in Dimetal Chemistry. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 27, 4023–4038. 10.1002/ejic.200900312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Giordana A.; Priola E.; Bonometti E.; Benzi P.; Operti L.; Diana E. Structural and Spectroscopic Study of the Asymmetric 2-(2′-Pyridyl)-1,8-Naphthyridine Ligand with Closed-Shell Metals. Polyhedron 2017, 138, 239–248. 10.1016/j.poly.2017.09.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dong Y.-B.; Geng Y.; Ma J.-P.; Huang R.-Q. Organometallic Silver(I) Supramolecular Complexes Generated from Multidentate Furan-Containing Symmetric and Unsymmetric Fulvene Ligands and Silver(I) Salts. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1693–1703. 10.1021/ic048518h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yue N. L. S.; Jennings M. C.; Puddephatt R. J. Disilver(I) Macrocycles: Variation of Cavity Size with Anion Binding. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1125–1131. 10.1021/ic048549c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Beauchamp D. A.; Loeb S. J. Molecular Squares, Rectangles and Infinite Helical Chains Utilising the Simple ‘Corner’ Ligand 4-(2-Pyridyl)-Pyrimidine. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2484–2485. 10.1039/B206989J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wiley C. A.; Holloway L. R.; Miller T. F.; Lyon Y.; Julian R. R.; Hooley R. J. Electronic Effects on Narcissistic Self-Sorting in Multicomponent Self-Assembly of Fe-Iminopyridine Meso-Helicates. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 9805–9815. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ronson T. K.; Zarra S.; Black S. P.; Nitschke J. R. Metal–organic Container Molecules through Subcomponent Self-Assembly. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2476–2490. 10.1039/c2cc36363a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mosquera J.; Ronson T. K.; Nitschke J. Subcomponent Flexibility Enables Conversion between D4-Symmetric CdII8L8 and T-Symmetric CdII4L4 Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1812–1815. 10.1021/jacs.5b12955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fatila E. M.; Twum E. B.; Karty J. A.; Flood A. H. Ion Pairing and Co-Facial Stacking Drive High-Fidelity Bisulfate Assembly with Cyanostar Macrocyclic Hosts. Chem. - Eur. J. 2017, 23, 10652–10662. 10.1002/chem.201701763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dobscha J. R.; Debnath S.; Fadler R. E.; Fatila E. M.; Pink M.; Raghavachari K.; Flood A. H. Host-Host Interactions Control Self-Assembly and Switching of Triple and Double Decker Stacks of Tricarbazole Macrocycles Co-Assembled with Anti-Electrostatic Bisulfate Dimers. Chem. - Eur. J. 2018, 24, 9841–9852. 10.1002/chem.201800827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Substantial disorder of the oxygen atoms of the encapsulated HSO4– anions precluded accurate resolution of the hydrogen atom of these anions. However, the observed distance between the disordered HSO4– anions is consistent with the presence of a hydrogen-bonded dimer.
  42. Bravin C.; Guidetti A.; Licini G.; Zonta C. Supramolecular Cages as Differential Sensors for Dicarboxylate Anions: Guest Length Sensing Using Principal Component Analysis of ESI-MS and 1H-NMR Raw Data. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 3523–3528. 10.1039/C8SC05527K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Clever G. H.; Kawamura W.; Shionoya M. Encapsulation versus Aggregation of Metal–Organic Cages Controlled by Guest Size Variation. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 4689–4691. 10.1021/ic200517r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Minisci F.; Citterio A.; Giordano C. Electron-Transfer Processes: Peroxydisulfate, a Useful and Versatile Reagent in Organic Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16, 27–32. 10.1021/ar00085a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja9b05432_si_001.pdf (3.1MB, pdf)
ja9b05432_si_002.cif (6MB, cif)
ja9b05432_si_003.cif (4.8MB, cif)
ja9b05432_si_004.cif (6MB, cif)
ja9b05432_si_005.cif (9.1MB, cif)
ja9b05432_si_006.cif (5.5MB, cif)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES