Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Curr HIV Res. 2019;17(2):94–101. doi: 10.2174/1570162X17666190618154534

Synthetic Opioid Use and Common Injection-associated Viruses: Expanding the Translational Research Agenda

Jason T Blackard 1,*, Jennifer L Brown 2, Michael S Lyons 3
PMCID: PMC6756949  NIHMSID: NIHMS1040601  PMID: 31210115

Abstract

The US is in the midst of a major epidemic of opioid addiction and related comorbidities. People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at significant risk for transmission of several blood-borne pathogens including the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Commonly abused opioids and their receptors promote viral replication and virus-mediated pathology. However, most studies demonstrating an adverse effect of drugs of abuse have been conducted in vitro, the specific effects of synthetic opioids on viral replication have been poorly characterized, and the evaluation of opioid-virus interactions in clinically relevant populations is rare. Rigorous characterization of the interactions among synthetic opioids, host cells, and common injection-associated viral infections will require an interdisciplinary research approach and translational studies conducted on humans. Such research promises to improve clinical management paradigms for difficult-to-treat populations, facilitate rational public health policies given severely strained resources, and reveal additional pathways for novel target-specific therapeutic interventions. This mini-review examines the published literature on the effects of opioids on HIV, HBV, and HCV pathogenesis and proposes a series of scientific questions and considerations to establish a translational research agenda focused on opioid-virus interactions.

Keywords: HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), drug use, opioid, pathogenesis

1. THE OPIOID CRISIS

The US is in the midst of a major opioid crisis [1], and adverse outcomes from opioid use disorder (OUD) continue despite prevention and harm reduction strategies. Drug overdose deaths tripled from 1999 to 2014, and deaths involving synthetic opioids other than methadone and heroin increased further from 2014 to 2015 [2, 3]. The synthetic opioid fentanyl is now involved in >60% of overdose deaths [1, 2]. Nationally, hospitalizations after fentanyl overdose and synthetic opioid deaths increased by 426% and 79%, respectively, during 2013–2014 [4, 5]. 2017 data found that ~90% of unintentional overdoses involved fentanyl or fentanyl analogs (FA) [5, 6].

Persons with OUD are at significant risk for transmission of viral infections such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) both from high-risk sexual activity and the sharing of injection equipment. Persons who inject drugs (PWID) account for 8% of new HIV infections and 15% of those living with HIV in the US [7]. An association between fentanyl use and HIV infection has been reported in other settings as well [8, 9]. People living with HIV who also inject drugs have higher age-matched morbidity and mortality compared to people living with HIV who do not inject [10]. Moreover, the proportion of PWID with HBV has increased in recent years [11–14], and increased numbers of acute HBV infections have been reported in Florida, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee [15, 16]. Globally, HCV prevalence rates range from 60% to 80% in PWID [17], and the number of acute HCV infections has risen steadily across the United States with just twelve states accounting for 68.6% of cases [7].

Currently, translational/interdisciplinary research related to this opioid-centered epidemic relies heavily on in vitro studies of other non-opioid drugs of abuse and studies of opioid-virus interactions in clinically relevant populations are rare. A robust understanding of opioid-host and opioid-virus interactions in patient populations is limited to date but remains essential for the development of new and optimized treatment and harm reduction strategies.

2. TREATMENT CHALLENGES

Medications approved for the treatment of OUD are underutilized by those most affected ones and are not offered in many settings. Community-based treatment programs do not always offer medication-assisted treatment (MAT), the gold-standard OUD treatment. Moreover, specific data on the efficacy of different MAT options and the outcomes for patients with synthetic opioid addiction are lacking. Service gaps remain across the substance use care continuum from initial screening through engagement and retention in appropriate treatment. There are also significant gaps existing in testing, linking, and retaining patients with OUD to HIV, HBV, and HCV prevention and care services. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Preventive Services Task Force, and the Institute of Medicine, all recommend routine HIV and HCV testing for high-risk individuals, including those with a history of injection drug use [18–23]. Testing addresses the first step in the treatment care cascade by identifying patients (potentially at an earlier disease stage), and may facilitate earlier treatment initiation [24]. Despite being at increased risk, HIV testing rates have declined among opioid users in the US in recent years [25, 26]. While sustained viral suppression is effective at reducing transmission to others, linkage and retention in HIV and HCV care are often poor, with lower retention in HIV care among individuals using illicit substances [27, 28]. Indeed, recent meta-analyses examining the HIV and HCV care cascades highlight significant gaps in the care continuums from initial testing, confirmatory testing, and linkage to care to initiation of treatment, and optimal virologic response, particularly among individuals who use opioids [24, 28]. Nonetheless, results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrate that extended-release naltrexone improves or extends HIV viral suppression and provides encouraging data for treatment of patients with OUD and viral infection [29]. Among HCV-infected PWIDs, high rates of viral clearance were achieved when treatment with direct-acting antivirals and opioid agonist therapy were given [30].

3. OPIOIDS

Opioids include both endogenous and exogenous (synthetic) compounds that function through activation of several opioid receptors. Opioid receptors are abundantly expressed on various immune cells including lymphocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and monocytes [31]. Opioid receptors are also present in the liver [31, 32]. Opioid receptors are classified as μ-opioid receptors (MORs), δ-opioid receptors (DORs), κ-opioid receptors (KORs), and opioid-like receptors (OLR) and are encoded by the oPrM1, OPRD1, OPRK1, and OLR genes, respectively [33]. Upon receptor activation, adenylyl cyclase is inhibited, which activates K+ channels and diminishes conductance of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. Opioid receptors also activate mitogen-activated protein kinases and phospholipase C-mediated signaling, leading to the formation of IP3 and diacylglycerol. These effects activate or inhibit multiple downstream signals that mediate the intrinsic effects of opioids [34, 35]. Importantly, opioid receptors are abundantly expressed on various immune cells [31, 36] and in the liver, where they are important mediators of liver disease progression [37–43].

Underappreciated is the fact that commonly abused substances antagonize innate immune responses and promote viral replication (Table 1). However, the vast majority of data on how drugs of abuse, including opioids, regulate viral pathogenesis are derived from in vitro studies or ex vivo infections in the presence of the drug. Patient studies are rare, and the clinical relevance of many of the findings reported to date remain largely speculative in the absence of longitudinal studies conducted in persons with OUD. Nonetheless, because viral replication is a major predictor of disease progression, transmission, and treatment response, the interactions between drugs of abuse and viral pathogenesis require thorough investigation.

Table 1.

Effects of substance abuse on viral replication.

Substance Effect Virus Cell Types
Methadone Increases HIV Monocyte-derived macrophages [62]; fetal microglia [62]
Methadone --- HCV No published data
Methamphetamine Increases HIV Monocyte-derived macrophages [71, 74, 75, 100]; neural progenitor cells [76]; dendritic cells [52, 72, 73]; HIV-infected patients [77, 78, 101]
Methamphetamine Increases HCV Hepatocytes [89]
Cocaine Increases HIV Monocyte-derived macrophages [48, 49]; T cells (84); dendritic cells [52, 53]; PBMCs [45,46]
Cocaine --- HCV No published data
Morphine Increases HIV Monocyte-derived macrophages [56, 59, 68]; neonatal macrophages [57]; latently-infected T lymphoblasts (61); PBMCs [44, 60]
Morphine Increases HCV Hepatocyte cell lines [86–88]
Heroin Increases HIV Monocyte-derived macrophages (59, 70); latently-infected T lymphoblasts (61)
Heroin Increases HCV HCV-infected patients [85]
Opioid peptides Increase HIV Fetal perivascular microglia [65]; fetal brain tissue [64]; monocyte cell lines [66, 67]
Opioid peptides --- HCV No published data

4. HIV AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE

Much of our current mechanistic understanding of how drugs of abuse impact viral pathogenesis is derived from in vitro and ex vivo studies, and the specific effects of synthetic opioids on viral replication have not been reported. Initial studies with non-opioid drugs of abused showed increased viral replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy individuals that were infected ex vivo with clinical isolates of HIV in the presence of cocaine or morphine [44–46]. Antibodies to transforming growth factor beta blocked cocaine-enhanced HIV replication [46]. Cocaine also downregulates chemokines such as MIP-1α while upregulating CCR5 co-receptor expression [47], suggesting that it may contribute to increased susceptibility to infection, as well as disease progression. Cocaine also promotes HIV gene transcription through NFκB and mitogen- and stress-activated kinase 1 (MSK1) signaling, phosphorylation of histone H3, and phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase [48–50]. In the simian HIV model, cocaine treatment of macrophages similarly increases viral replication, activation of the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR) through NFκB, and increased IL-10 expression [51]. Cocaine has also been shown to inhibit microRNA-155 in monocyte-derived dendritic cells and increase their susceptibility to HIV infection [52]. A recent study demonstrated that cocaine induces overexpression of DC-SIGN and facilitates virus transfer from dendritic cells to T-cells [53].

As with other drugs of abuse, morphine-induced transactivation of the HIV LTR has been demonstrated [54]. Morphine increases replication of HIV in PBMCs [44, 55], as well as in purified blood-derived macrophages [56, 57], by enhanced CCR5 – but not CXCR4 – receptor mRNA expression and inhibition of β chemokines. In neonatal macrophages, morphine upregulates CCR5 co-receptor expression, inhibits MIP-1β, and enhances HIV replication [57]. This effect may not be limited to the periphery, as β chemokine expression is also downregulated and chemokine co-receptor is upregulated in a morphine-treated astrocytoma/ glioblastoma cell line [58]. Furthermore, morphine-treated cells express lower levels of cellular anti-HIV miRNA than untreated cells and compromise IFN-induced anti-HIV microRNA expression [59]. Similarly, morphine is also associated with decreased RNase L activity in PBMCs [60]. In latently-infected T lymphoblasts, reactivation of HIV was triggered by morphine in a dose-dependent manner [61]. A μ-opioid receptor agonist increases CXCR4 and CCR5 co-receptor expression, permitting enhanced replication of HIV [55]. Methadone – an opioid frequently used in the treatment of opioid use disorder – enhances HIV infection in several cell types by increased expression of CCR5 coreceptor [62, 63]. Similarly, endogenous opioid peptides such as β endorphin, endomorphin-1, and dynorphin enhance HIV expression [64–67]. Multiple studies have shown that opioid receptor antagonists can reverse the proviral effects of morphine, methadone, heroin, or opioid peptides [44, 59, 61, 62, 64, 65, 68–70]. Unfortunately, many drugs of abuse – including synthetic opioids – have not been evaluated thoroughly.

Other commonly abused substances also impact HIV replication. For instance, methamphetamine (meth) causes a dose-dependent increase of HIV reverse transcriptase activity in macrophages by upregulating CCR5 co-receptor expression and inhibiting endogenous IFNα [71]. Dopamine D1 receptor antagonists can block meth-induced virus replication. Similarly, meth enhances HIV infection and decreases chemokine production in dendritic cells [72, 73]. Subsequent studies reported that meth inhibits the anti-HIV activity of toll-like receptor 9 and suppresses several innate restriction factors associated with reduced type I IFN production [74, 75]. A recent study showed that meth induced transactivation of the LTR through NFκB and Sp1 and increased infection of neuronal progenitor cells [76]. These data are supported by higher HIV viral loads and lower CD4 cell counts observed in meth users in vivo [77, 78]. In non-viral systems, synthetic opioids such as fentanyl induce apoptosis, alter NFκB signaling, and can exert immunosuppressive effects [79–82]. However, similar studies on the cell targets of HIV infection have not been conducted nor have gene expression patterns been analyzed in individuals with HIV and synthetic opioid exposure.

The ability of opioids to modulate epigenetic changes – particularly microRNA expression – highlights another mechanism by which opioids impact viral infection. For example, morphine and heroin inhibit the expression of anti-HIV microRNAs that target the 3’UTR of viral transcripts [59, 61, 70]. Similarly, opioids inhibit anti-HIV microRNAs that stimulate replication of latent HIV in resting CD4+ T cells and monocytes [61, 83]. Expression analysis indicated downregulation of several anti-HIV microRNAs – particularly microRNA-125b – in primary CD4+ T cells treated with cocaine [84]. While these findings are intriguing, different drugs of abuse may differentially regulate microRNAs, and no studies have evaluated the impact of synthetic opioids on microRNA expression to date.

5. VIRAL HEPATITIS AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE

Several opioid receptors are expressed in the liver and – along with endogenous and exogenous opioids – may contribute to liver disease [37–43]. As HCV is commonly transmitted via injection drug use, understanding the impact of commonly abused substances on HCV replication and liver pathogenesis is important. Zhou et al. reported that HCV-infected heroin users had significantly higher HCV RNA levels compared to non-heroin users [85]. Levels of microRNAs known to promote HCV replication were also increased in heroin users with HCV infection. In vitro morphine treatment inhibits endogenous and recombinant IFNα and increases HCV expression in a dose-dependent manner. This induction requires NFκB and can be inhibited by opioid receptor antagonism [86, 87]. Interestingly, morphine withdrawal is also associated with increased HCV replication in vitro [88]. Methamphetamine inhibits endogenous IFNα, antagonizes the antiviral effects of recombinant IFNα, and enhances HCV replication in hepatocytes in vitro [89]. Multiple microRNAs stimulate or suppress HCV replication as reviewed elsewhere [90]. While opioids can regulate microRNA expression and alter HIV replication as outlined above, similar studies of opioid-HCV-microRNA interactions are absent from the literature. Moreover, the impact of individual synthetic opioids on HCV expression has not been evaluated to date. As well, despite its transmissibility by IDU, surprisingly little is known about the effects of any drug of abuse – including synthetic opioids – on HBV replication in vitro or in HBV-infected individuals with OUD.

6. RESEARCH PRIORITIES

The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) set forth several research priorities in its 2016 – 2020 Strategic Plan, including bridging the gap between research discovery and clinical and community practice and utilizing research to inform clinical practice [91]. While acknowledged as a complex challenge, it is one that is absolutely necessary to maximize benefits to the most impacted populations. NIDA also included the goal of “accelerating development of treatments” which requires repurposing medications already approved for other indications that may benefit people with substance use disorders and translating basic research on molecular pathways involved in substance abuse to develop new approaches that modulate specific pathways. Essential to achieving these goals is the robust characterization of opioid-host and opioid-virus interactions.

While several studies demonstrate an adverse effect of drugs of abuse – including opioids – on virus replication in vitro, confirmation of these findings in clinically relevant populations is rare. Despite a profound proviral effect caused by many commonly abused substances, the specific effects of synthetic opioids such as fentanyl or its analogs, on viral replication have not been evaluated in detail. We recently reported preliminary in vitro data showing that fentanyl causes increased expression of HIV, HBV, and HCV [92], although the mechanism(s) underlying this observation has yet to be determined and confirmatory studies in individuals with OUD are now required. Nonetheless, these findings and the larger landscape of interactions between viruses, substances of abuse, and a variety of cell pathways highlight the need to carefully study these interactions for each drug. For instance, if human studies confirm that fentanyl is associated with higher HCV RNA levels, then its therapeutic use in settings with limited knowledge of the patient’s HCV status (such as emergency rooms, resource constrained treatment centers, and/or private practice) might be limited or suggests that point-of-care viral testing is required. Similarly, increased viral replication in the presence of fentanyl could prompt physicians to prescribe more potent antivirals or to initiate treatment for OUD first. In addition, possible fentanyl-antiviral interactions could shift prescribers away from certain drug combinations. Finally, with increased availability of opioid antagonists, recreational users survive overdoses. Yet, their risk of co-morbid conditions such as HCV remains due to OUD relapse and HCV reinfection and could fuel secondary transmission events.

Prescription opioid use is common in individuals living with HIV [93, 94], and there is growing recreational use of synthetic opioids in individuals with or at risk for viral infections. Research related to this opioid-centered epidemic is lacking but is crucial to the development of new and optimized treatment and harm reduction strategies. For example, there is evidence that the linkage to treatment services is improved when provided within the same healthcare system [95]. This highlights the need for a coordinated, multi-faceted approach to improve substance use, HIV, and HCV outcomes among individuals with OUD that can be integrated more seamlessly within clinical care. Research to evaluate different care models to address the OUD and HCV, HIV care cascades is urgently needed [96]. An implementation of a scientific framework may be particularly useful to study alternative health care delivery approaches and the associated impact on OUD and injection-associated viral outcomes. Additionally, synthetic opioids may impact viral disease progression indirectly through drug-drug interactions and/or by reduced antiviral activity, although this remains to be explored in detail. Importantly, opioids can modulate epigenetic changes such as microRNA expression that impact viral infection [59, 61, 70, 83, 97]. However, the cellular pathways altered by synthetic opioid use have not been explored in vivo, thereby hindering the development of novel therapeutic strategies to treat complex virus-opioid interactions and the life-threatening comorbidities associated with recreational opioid use. Thus, a number of unanswered questions remain, such as:

Do synthetic opioids influence viral pathogenesis as documented for other commonly abused substances? Do individual synthetic opioids differ in their proviral or antiviral activities? Recreational use of synthetic opioids has risen dramatically in recent years. While fentanyl is perhaps the most widely known synthetic opioid, its structural scaffold has been modified periodically by illicit drug manufacturers to produce novel analogs [98]. Even as multiple synthetic opioids continue to adulterate the drug supply, there are no published data evaluating the impact of these agents on replication of any viruses, although our preliminary in vitro studies suggest that fentanyl causes increased expression of HIV, HBV, and HCV [92]. These findings require rigorous examination in vivo as well. Importantly, the mechanisms described thus far for how other drugs of abuse alter HIV or HCV replication are quite diverse. Thus, mechanistic studies are required for each drug of abuse (i.e., individual synthetic opioids may alter virus replication in a drug-specific manner).

Does opioid receptor antagonism counteract the effects of synthetic opioids on viral replication, thereby providing an added benefit to individuals with continued synthetic opioid use? Opioid antagonists such as naloxone and naltrexone are known to reverse the enhancement of viral replication by several drugs of abuse [44, 56, 60, 63, 68–70, 86, 87]. However, the potential effects of these agents on synthetic opioid-mediated virus replication have not been reported to date and must be evaluated in at-risk patient populations.

What role does polysubstance use play in viral pathogenesis?

Polysubstance use is the norm in most individuals with OUD. Moreover, current NIDA research priorities highlight polysubstance use and the need to broaden the research focus to include complex interactions (e.g. multiple substances, comorbidities, and coinfections), the inherent variability in substance use, and the need to develop treatments and delivery strategies that simultaneously address substance use and comorbidities [91]. Nonetheless, whether multiple drugs of abuse have additive, synergistic, or antagonist effects on viral replication and pathogenesis remains unexplored and requires careful evaluation.

Are there drug-drug interactions between synthetic opioids and currently prescribed antiviral medications for HIV, HBV, or HCV that must be considered in high-risk patient populations? Very little is known about the possible interactions between synthetic opioids and antiviral agents. While a single study has shown that ritonavir is associated with increased fentanyl concentrations in plasma [99], other antiretroviral (ART) medications were not evaluated. Similarly, there are no data on whether synthetic opioids counteract the antiviral effects of direct-acting agents (DAAs) for the treatment of HCV. Nonetheless, drug-drug interactions between synthetic opioids and currently prescribed DAAs and/or ARTs must be carefully evaluated in high-risk individuals.

What cellular pathways and microRNAs are regulated by synthetic opioids that could be exploited to control viral replication in virally-infected individuals with substance use disorders? Commonly abused substances and their receptors affect viral replication and virus-mediated pathology through the multiple mechanisms outlined above and elsewhere [32], although surprisingly little is known about how synthetic opioids shape the cellular transcriptome, contribute to cell dysfunction, or regulate disease progression. Different drugs of abuse are likely to have distinct effects on a particular signaling pathway and/or cell type; yet, robust mechanistic evaluations of opioid-virus and opioid cell interactions are lacking and represent a significant gap in the available literature. Detecting transcriptional changes using unbiased high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) would expedite the discovery of novel mRNA and microRNA species that are critical for virus-cell-opioid interactions and/or define dominant gene expression signatures that are altered in response to individual synthetic opioids. Such investigations would also as serve as the basis for biomarker discovery and could reveal additional pathways for novel target-specific therapeutic interventions.

CONCLUSION

There is an urgent public health need to address the linked opioid, HIV, and HBV/HCV epidemics, particularly in regions with a high prevalence of opioid use disorder. This review summarizes the existing research regarding the relationship between opioid use and viral replication and identifies gaps in the literature. Given the current national opioid crisis, an interdisciplinary research approach that addresses the intersection of opioid use and infectious diseases requires an immediate coordinated approach by investigators with complementary expertise across the translational research spectrum. For example, research to establish a cohort study of individuals with OUD at-risk or infected with viral infections could facilitate research across the translational continuum. Ultimately, such research offers the potential to inform treatment decisions regarding optimal treatment approaches for opioid use disorder and co-occurring HIV, HCV, and/or HBV.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse [grant number DA048439 to JTB], the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [grant number GM105414 to JTB], the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [grant number AA025882 to JLB], and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [grant number H79TI080732 to JLB and MSL].

Footnotes

DISCLAIMER: The above article has been published in Epub (ahead of print) on the basis of the materials provided by the author. The Editorial Department reserves the right to make minor modifications for further improvement of the manuscript.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • [1].O’Donnell JK, Gladden RM, Seth P. Trends in deaths involving heroin and synthetic opioids excluding methadone, and law enforcement drug product reports, by census region - United States, 2006–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017; 66(34): 897–903. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm6634a2] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Rudd RA, Seth P, David F, Scholl L. Increases in drug and opioid-involved overdose deaths - United States, 2010–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65(50–51): 1445–52. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm655051e1] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, Gladden RM. Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths--United States, 2000–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 64(50–51): 1378–82. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Gladden RM, Martinez P, Seth P. Fentanyl law enforcement sub-missions and increases in synthetic opioid-involved overdose deaths - 27 states, 2013–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65(33): 837–43. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm6533a2] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Peterson AB, Gladden RM, Delcher C, et al. Increases in fentanyl-related overdose deaths - Florida and Ohio, 2013–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65(33): 844–9. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm6533a3] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Daniulaityte R, Juhascik MP, Strayer KE, et al. Overdose deaths related to fentanyl and its analogs - Ohio, January-February 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017; 66(34): 904–8. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm6634a3] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV in the United States: at a glance 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html
  • [8].Talu A, Rajaleid K, Abel-Ollo K, et al. HIV infection and risk behaviour of primary fentanyl and amphetamine injectors in Tallinn, Estonia: implications for intervention. Int J Drug Policy 2010; 21(1): 56–63. [ 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.02.007] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Cranston K, Alpren C, John B, et al. HIV diagnoses among persons who inject drugs - Northeastern Massachusetts, 2015–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68(10): 253–4. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm6810a6] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Altice FL, Kamarulzaman A, Soriano VV, Schechter M, Friedland GH. Treatment of medical, psychiatric, and substance-use comorbidities in people infected with HIV who use drugs. Lancet 2010; 376(9738): 367–87. [ 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60829-X] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Wasley A, Grytdal S, Gallagher K. Surveillance for acute viral hepatitis--United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ 2008; 57(2): 1–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Garfein RS, Vlahov D, Galai N, Doherty MC, Nelson KE. Viral infections in short-term injection drug users: the prevalence of the hepatitis C, hepatitis B, human immunodeficiency, and human T-lymphotropic viruses. Am J Public Health 1996; 86(5): 655–61. [ 10.2105/AJPH.86.5.655] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Levine OS, Vlahov D, Nelson KE. Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infections among injecting drug users: seroprevalence, risk factors, and viral interactions. Epidemiol Rev 1994; 16(2): 418–36. [ 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036161] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].López-Zetina J, Kerndt P, Ford W, Woerhle T, Weber M. Prevalence of HIV and hepatitis B and self-reported injection risk behavior during detention among street-recruited injection drug users in Los Angeles County, 1994–1996. Addiction 2001; 96(4): 589–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Harris AM, Iqbal K, Schillie S, et al. Increases in acute hepatitis B virus infections - Kentucky, Tennessee, and West Virginia, 2006–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65(3): 47–50. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm6503a2] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Comer M, Matthias J, Nicholson G, Asher A, Holmberg S, Wilson C. Increase in acute hepatitis B infections - Pasco County, Florida, 2011–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67(7): 230–1. [ 10.15585/mmwr.mm6707a6] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Nelson PK, Mathers BM, Cowie B, et al. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: results of systematic reviews. Lancet 2011; 378(9791): 571–83. [ 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61097-0] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hepatitis C questions and answers for health professionals 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hcv/hcvfaq.htm#a2
  • [19].Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 55(RR-14): 1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Moyer VA, Force UPST. Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159(5): 349–57. [ 10.7326/0003-4819-159-5-201309030-00672] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Moyer VA, Force UPST. Screening for HIV: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159(1): 51–60. [ 10.7326/0003-4819-159-1-201307020-00645] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Mitchell AE, Colvin HM, Palmer Beasley R. Institute of Medicine recommendations for the prevention and control of hepatitis B and C. Hepatology 2010; 51(3): 729–33. [ 10.1002/hep.23561] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].HIV screening and access to care: health care system capacity for increased HIV testing and provision of care. Washington, DC: 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Yehia BR, Schranz AJ, Umscheid CA, Lo Re V III. The treatment cascade for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9(7): e101554 [ 10.1371/journal.pone.0101554] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Bachhuber MA, Cunningham CO. Changes in testing for human immunodeficiency virus, sexually transmitted infections, and hepatitis C virus in opioid treatment programs. JAMA 2013; 310(24): 2671–2. [ 10.1001/jama.2013.278456] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].D’Aunno T, Pollack HA, Jiang L, Metsch LR, Friedmann PD. HIV testing in the nation’s opioid treatment programs, 2005–2011: the role of state regulations. Health Serv Res 2014; 49(1): 230–48. [ 10.1111/1475-6773.12094] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, Del Rio C, Burman WJ. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52(6): 793–800. [ 10.1093/cid/ciq243] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Mugavero MJ, Amico KR, Horn T, Thompson MA. The state of engagement in HIV care in the United States: from cascade to continuum to control. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57(8): 1164–71. [ 10.1093/cid/cit420] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Springer SA, Di Paola A, Azar MM, et al. Extended-release naltrexone improves viral suppression among incarcerated persons living with HIV with opioid use disorders transitioning to the community: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 78(1): 43–53. [ 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001634] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Macías J, Morano LE, Téllez F, et al. Response to direct-acting antiviral therapy among ongoing drug users and people receiving opioid substitution therapy. J Hepatol 2019S0168–8278(19): 30133–3. [ 10.1016/jjhep.2019.02.018] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Banerjee A, Strazza M, Wigdahl B, Pirrone V, Meucci O, Nonne-macher MR. Role of mu-opioids as cofactors in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease progression and neuropathogenesis. J Neurovirol 2011; 17(4): 291–302. [ 10.1007/s13365-011-0037-2] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Tahamtan A, Tavakoli-Yaraki M, Mokhtari-Azad T, et al. Opioids and viral infections: a double-edged sword. Front Microbiol 2016; 7: 970 [ 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00970] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Stevens CW. The evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors. Front Biosci 2009; 14: 1247–69. [ 10.2741/3306] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Stein C Opioid Receptors. Annu Rev Med 2016; 67: 433–51. [ 10.1146/annurev-med-062613-093100] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Law PY, Wong YH, Loh HH. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of opioid receptor signaling. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2000; 40: 389–430. [ 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.389] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Kraus J, Börner C, Giannini E, Höllt V. The role of nuclear factor kappaB in tumor necrosis factor-regulated transcription of the human mu-opioid receptor gene. Mol Pharmacol 2003; 64(4): 876–84. [ 10.1124/mol.64.4.876] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Tang B, Li Y, Yuan S, Tomlinson S, He S. Upregulation of the δ opioid receptor in liver cancer promotes liver cancer progression both in vitro and in vivo. Int J Oncol 2013; 43(4): 1281–90. [ 10.3892/ijo.2013.2046] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Lu J, Liu Z, Zhao L, Tian H, Liu X, Yuan C. In vivo and in vitro inhibition of human liver cancer progress by downregulation of the μ-opioid receptor and relevant mechanisms. Oncol Rep 2013; 30(4): 1731–8. [ 10.3892/or.2013.2640] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Tang B, Zhang Y, Liang R, et al. Activation of the δ-opioid receptor inhibits serum deprivation-induced apoptosis of human liver cells via the activation of PKC and the mitochondrial pathway. Int J Mol Med 2011; 28(6): 1077–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Jia K, Sun D, Ling S, et al. Activated δ-opioid receptors inhibit hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis in liver cancer cells through the PKC/ERK signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep 2014; 10(2): 839–47. [ 10.3892/mmr.2014.2301] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].De Minicis S, Candelaresi C, Marzioni M, et al. Role of endogenous opioids in modulating HSC activity in vitro and liver fibrosis in vivo. Gut 2008; 57(3): 352–64. [ 10.1136/gut.2007.120303] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Jaume M, Jacquet S, Cavaillès P, et al. Opioid receptor blockade reduces Fas-induced hepatitis in mice. Hepatology 2004; 40(5): 1136–43. [ 10.1002/hep.20428] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Ebrahimkhani MR, Kiani S, Oakley F, et al. Naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, attenuates liver fibrosis in bile duct ligated rats. Gut 2006; 55(11): 1606–16. [ 10.1136/gut.2005.076778] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Peterson PK, Sharp BM, Gekker G, Portoghese PS, Sannerud K Jr, Balfour HH Jr. Morphine promotes the growth of HIV-1 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cocultures. AIDS 1990; 4(9): 869–73. [ 10.1097/00002030-199009000-00006] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Bagasra O, Pomerantz RJ. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the presence of cocaine. J Infect Dis 1993; 168(5): 1157–64. [ 10.1093/infdis/168.5.1157] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Peterson PK, Gekker G, Chao CC, Schut R, Molitor TW Jr, Balfour HH Jr. Cocaine potentiates HIV-1 replication in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cocultures. Involvement of transforming growth factor-beta. J Immunol 1991; 146(1): 81–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Nair MP, Chadha KC, Hewitt RG, Mahajan S, Sweet A, Schwartz SA. Cocaine differentially modulates chemokine production by mononuclear cells from normal donors and human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2000; 7(1): 96–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Sahu G, Farley K, El-Hage N, et al. Cocaine promotes both initiation and elongation phase of HIV-1 transcription by activating NF-κB and MSK1 and inducing selective epigenetic modifications at HIV-1 LTR. Virology 2015; 483: 185–202. [ 10.1016/j.virol.2015.03.036] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Swepson C, Ranjan A, Balasubramaniam M, Pandhare J, Dash C. Cocaine enhances HIV-1 transcription in macrophages by inducing p38 MAPK phosphorylation. Front Microbiol 2016; 7: 823 [ 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00823] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Tyagi M, Bukrinsky M, Simon GL. Mechanisms of HIV transcriptional regulation by drugs of abuse. Curr HIV Res 2016; 14(5): 442–54. [ 10.2174/1570162X14666160324124736] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Dhillon NK, Williams R, Peng F, et al. Cocaine-mediated enhancement of virus replication in macrophages: implications for human immunodeficiency virus-associated dementia. J Neurovirol 2007; 13(6): 483–95. [ 10.1080/13550280701528684] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Napuri J, Pilakka-Kanthikeel S, Raymond A, et al. Cocaine enhances HIV-1 infectivity in monocyte derived dendritic cells by suppressing microRNA-155. PLoS One 2013; 8(12): e83682 [ 10.1371/journal.pone.0083682] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Prasad A, Kulkarni R, Jiang S, Groopman JE. Cocaine enhances DC to T-cell HIV-1 transmission by activating DC-SIGN/LARG/LSP1 complex and facilitating infectious synapse formation. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 40648 [ 10.1038/srep40648] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Squinto SP, Mondal D, Block AL, Prakash O. Morphine-induced transactivation of HIV-1 LTR in human neuroblastoma cells. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1990; 6(10): 1163–8. [ 10.1089/aid.1990.6.1163] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Steele AD, Henderson EE, Rogers TJ. Mu-opioid modulation of HIV-1 coreceptor expression and HIV-1 replication. Virology 2003; 309(1): 99–107. [ 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00015-1] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Guo CJ, Li Y, Tian S, Wang X, Douglas SD, Ho WZ. Morphine enhances HIV infection of human blood mononuclear phagocytes through modulation of beta-chemokines and CCR5 receptor. J Investig Med 2002; 50(6): 435–42. [ 10.1136/jim-50-06-03] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Li Y, Merrill JD, Mooney K, et al. Morphine enhances HIV infection of neonatal macrophages. Pediatr Res 2003; 54(2): 282–8. [ 10.1203/01.PDR.0000074973.83826.4C] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Mahajan SD, Aalinkeel R, Reynolds JL, et al. Morphine exacerbates HIV-1 viral protein gp120 induced modulation of chemokine gene expression in U373 astrocytoma cells. Curr HIV Res 2005; 3(3): 277–88. [ 10.2174/1570162054368048] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Wang X, Ye L, Zhou Y, Liu MQ, Zhou DJ, Ho WZ. Inhibition of anti-HIV microRNA expression: a mechanism for opioid-mediated enhancement of HIV infection of monocytes. Am J Pathol 2011; 178(1): 41–7. [ 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.042] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Homan JW, Steele AD, Martinand-Mari C, et al. Inhibition of morphine-potentiated HIV-1 replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with the nuclease-resistant 2–5A agonist analog, 2–5A(N6B). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2002; 30(1): 9–20. [ 10.1097/00042560-200205010-00002] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Prottengeier J, Koutsilieri E, Scheller C. The effects of opioids on HIV reactivation in latently-infected T-lymphoblasts. AIDS Res Ther 2014; 11: 17 [ 10.1186/1742-6405-11-17] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Li Y, Wang X, Tian S, Guo CJ, Douglas SD, Ho WZ. Methadone enhances human immunodeficiency virus infection of human immune cells. J Infect Dis 2002; 185(1): 118–22. [ 10.1086/338011] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Suzuki S, Carlos MP, Chuang LF, Torres JV, Doi RH, Chuang RY. Methadone induces CCR5 and promotes AIDS virus infection. FEBS Lett 2002; 519(1–3): 173–7. [ 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02746-1] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Peterson PK, Gekker G, Hu S, Lokensgard J, Portoghese PS, Chao CC. Endomorphin-1 potentiates HIV-1 expression in human brain cell cultures: implication of an atypical mu-opioid receptor. Neuropharmacology 1999; 38(2): 273–8. [ 10.1016/S0028-3908(98)00167-1] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Sundar KS, Kamaraju LS, Dingfelder J, et al. beta-Endorphin enhances the replication of neurotropic human immunodeficiency virus in fetal perivascular microglia. J Neuroimmunol 1995; 61(1): 97–104. [ 10.1016/0165-5728(95)00089-K] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Chao CC, Gekker G, Sheng WS, Hu S, Portoghese PS, Peterson PK. Endogenous opioid peptides suppress cytokine-mediated upregulation of HIV-1 expression in the chronically infected promonocyte clone U1. Adv Exp Med Biol 1995; 373: 65–72. [ 10.1007/978-1-4615-1951-5_10] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Chao CC, Gekker G, Hu S, Sheng WS, Portoghese PS, Peterson PK. Upregulation of HIV-1 expression in cocultures of chronically infected promonocytes and human brain cells by dynorphin. Biochem Pharmacol 1995; 50(5): 715–22. [ 10.1016/0006-2952(95)00176-Z] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Ho WZ, Guo CJ, Yuan CS, Douglas SD, Moss J. Methylnaltrexone antagonizes opioid-mediated enhancement of HIV infection of human blood mononuclear phagocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003; 307(3): 1158–62. [ 10.1124/jpet.103.056697] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Wang X, Tan N, Douglas SD, Zhang T, Wang YJ, Ho WZ. Morphine inhibits CD8+ T cell-mediated, noncytolytic, anti-HIV activity in latently infected immune cells. J Leukoc Biol 2005; 78(3): 772–6. [ 10.1189/jlb.0305167] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Wang X, Ma TC, Li JL, et al. Heroin inhibits HIV-restriction miRNAs and enhances HIV infection of macrophages. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 1230 [ 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01230] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Liang H, Wang X, Chen H, et al. Methamphetamine enhances HIV infection of macrophages. Am J Pathol 2008; 172(6): 1617–24. [ 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070971] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Nair MP, Saiyed ZM. Effect of methamphetamine on expression of HIV coreceptors and CC-chemokines by dendritic cells. Life Sci 2011; 88(21–22): 987–94. [ 10.1016/j.lfs.2010.09.019] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Nair MP, Saiyed ZM, Nair N, et al. Methamphetamine enhances HIV-1 infectivity in monocyte derived dendritic cells. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2009; 4(1): 129–39. [ 10.1007/s11481-008-9128-0] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Wang X, Wang Y, Ye L, et al. Modulation of intracellular restriction factors contributes to methamphetamine-mediated enhancement of acquired immune deficiency syndrome virus infection of macrophages. Curr HIV Res 2012; 10(5): 407–14. [ 10.2174/157016212802138797] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Cen P, Ye L, Su QJ, et al. Methamphetamine inhibits Toll-like receptor 9-mediated anti-HIV activity in macrophages. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2013; 29(8): 1129–37. [ 10.1089/aid.2012.0264] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Skowronska M, McDonald M, Velichkovska M, Leda AR, Park M, Toborek M. Methamphetamine increases HIV infectivity in neural progenitor cells. J Biol Chem 2018; 293(1): 296–311. [ 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000795] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Jiang J, Wang M, Liang B, et al. In vivo effects of methamphetamine on HIV-1 replication: A population-based study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016; 159: 246–54. [ 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.027] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Ellis RJ, Childers ME, Cherner M, Lazzaretto D, Letendre S, Grant I. Increased human immunodeficiency virus loads in active methamphetamine users are explained by reduced effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis 2003; 188(12): 1820–6. [ 10.1086/379894] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Ma K, Ma P, Lu H, Liu S, Cao Q. Fentanyl suppresses the survival of CD4+ T cells isolated from human umbilical cord blood through inhibition of IKKs-mediated NF-κB activation. Scand J Immunol 2017; 85(5): 343–9. [ 10.1111/sji.12538] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Delogu G, Moretti S, Antonucci A, et al. Apoptogenic effect of fentanyl on freshly isolated peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Trauma 2004; 57(1): 75–81. [ 10.1097/01.TA.0000075349.66640.3E] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Wang Y, Chen M. Fentanyl ameliorates severe acute pancreatitis-induced myocardial injury in rats by regulating NF-κB signaling pathway. Med Sci Monit 2017; 23: 3276–83. [ 10.12659/MSM.902245] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Kocak N, Ozen F, Yildirim IH, Duran Y. Fentanyl inhibits tumorigenesis from human breast stem cells by inducing apoptosis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 18(3): 735–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Purohit V, Rapaka RS, Rutter J, Shurtleff D. Do opioids activate latent HIV-1 by down-regulating anti-HIV microRNAs? J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2012; 7(3): 519–23. [ 10.1007/s11481-012-9356-1] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Mantri CK, Pandhare Dash J, Mantri JV, Dash CC. Cocaine enhances HIV-1 replication in CD4+ T cells by down-regulating MiR-125b. PLoS One 2012; 7(12): e51387 [ 10.1371/journal.pone.0051387] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Zhou Y, Sun L, Wang X, et al. Heroin use promotes HCV infection and dysregulates HCV-related circulating microRNAs. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2015; 10(1): 102–10. [ 10.1007/s11481-014-9577-6] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Li Y, Zhang T, Douglas SD, et al. Morphine enhances hepatitis C virus (HCV) replicon expression. Am J Pathol 2003; 163(3): 1167–75. [ 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63476-1] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Li Y, Ye L, Peng JS, et al. Morphine inhibits intrahepatic interferon- alpha expression and enhances complete hepatitis C virus replication. J Infect Dis 2007; 196(5): 719–30. [ 10.1086/520093] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Wang CQ, Li Y, Douglas SD, et al. Morphine withdrawal enhances hepatitis C virus replicon expression. Am J Pathol 2005; 167(5): 1333–40. [ 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61220-5] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Ye L, Peng JS, Wang X, Wang YJ, Luo GX, Ho WZ. Methamphetamine enhances Hepatitis C virus replication in human hepatocytes. J Viral Hepat 2008; 15(4): 261–70. [ 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00940.x] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Zhu H, Geng Y, He Q, Li M. miRNAs regulate immune response and signaling during hepatitis C virus infection. Eur J Med Res 2018; 23(1): 19 [ 10.1186/s40001-018-0317-x] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health. 2016–2020 NIDA Strategic Plan: Advancing Addiction Science/ 2015.
  • [92].Blackard JT, Rouster SD, Shata MT, Sherman KE, Kong L, Eds. The synthetic opioid fentanyl enhances viral replication in vitro Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. 2019 March 4–7, 2019; Seattle, WA. [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Nolan S, Walley AY, Heeren TC, et al. HIV-infected individuals who use alcohol and other drugs, and virologic suppression. AIDS Care 2017; 29(9): 1129–36. [ 10.1080/09540121.2017.1327646] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Turner AN, Maierhofer C, Funderburg NT, et al. High levels of self-reported prescription opioid use by HIV-positive individuals. AIDS Care 2016; 28(12): 1559–65. [ 10.1080/09540121.2016.1198746] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Yehia BR, Ketner E, Momplaisir F, et al. Location of HIV diagnosis impacts linkage to medical care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 68(3): 304–9. [ 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000459] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Rich KM, Bia J, Altice FL, Feinberg J. Integrated models of care for individuals with opioid use disorder: how do we prevent HIV and HCV? Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2018; 15(3): 266–75. [ 10.1007/s11904-018-0396-x] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Pilakka-Kanthikeel S, Nair MP. Interaction of drugs of abuse and microRNA with HIV: a brief review. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 967 [ 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00967] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Jannetto PJ, Helander A, Garg U, Janis GC, Goldberger B, Ketha H. The fentanyl epidemic and evolution of fentanyl analogs in the United States and the European Union. Clin Chem 2018; 64(10): 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Olkkola KT, Palkama VJ, Neuvonen PJ. Ritonavir’s role in reducing fentanyl clearance and prolonging its half-life. Anesthesiology 1999; 91(3): 681–5. [ 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00020] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Toussi SS, Joseph A, Zheng JH, Dutta M, Santambrogio L, Goldstein H. Short communication: Methamphetamine treatment increases in vitro and in vivo HIV replication. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2009; 25(11): 1117–21. [ 10.1089/aid.2008.0282] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].King WD, Larkins S, Hucks-Ortiz C, et al. Factors associated with HIV viral load in a respondent driven sample in Los Angeles. AIDS Behav 2009; 13(1): 145–53. [ 10.1007/s10461-007-9337-1] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES