Skip to main content
The Journal of Neuroscience logoLink to The Journal of Neuroscience
. 2002 Sep 1;22(17):7680–7686. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-17-07680.2002

Adenosine Induces Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor-Mediated Mobilization of Intracellular Calcium Stores in Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Neurons

Radhika Basheer 1, Elda Arrigoni 2, Hemant S Thatte 3, Robert W Greene 4, Indu S Ambudkar 5, Robert W McCarley 1
PMCID: PMC6758010  PMID: 12196591

Abstract

In the cholinergic basal forebrain, we found previously that the extracellular adenosine concentration increase that accompanies sleep deprivation, acting via the A1 receptor, led to activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-κB and to the upregulation of A1 adenosine receptor mRNA. We thus began to examine intracellular signaling mechanisms. We report here that adenosine, acting in a dose-dependent manner and predominantly via A1receptors, stimulated IP3 receptor-regulated calcium release from intracellular stores. To the best of our knowledge, this calcium signaling pathway effect is a novel action of the Gi-coupled A1 adenosine receptor in neurons. Moreover, this calcium mobilization was not seen at all in noncholinergic neurons but was present in a large proportion of cholinergic neurons. These data suggest a potential role for a calcium-signaling pathway in adenosine-induced long-term effects of sleep deprivation and a key role for cholinergic neurons in this process.

Keywords: adenosine; cholinergic basal forebrain; A1adenosine receptor; intracellular calcium mobilization; inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor activation; sleep deprivation


There is now considerable evidence that adenosine, acting in the basal forebrain (BF), is a homeostatic sleep factor regulating the increased propensity to sleep after an increased duration of wakefulness (Porkka-Heiskanen et al., 1997;Basheer et al., 1999, 2000). There is also a considerable body of evidence about the immediate effects of adenosine on postsynaptic membrane ionic mechanisms. Adenosine, via the A1receptor, activates an inwardly rectifying potassium current and blocks the hyperpolarizing current, thereby causing hyperpolarization of neurons (Rainnie et al., 1994; for review, see Haas and Selbach, 2000).

In contrast, very little is known in the brain, and nothing in the BF, about the long-term effects of adenosine that may be mediated by prolonged receptor activation and second messenger-mediated intracellular mechanisms. This may be important not only from the standpoint of the intrinsic value of increased cellular and biological knowledge but also for the possible behavioral consequences of such actions. For example, sleep restriction over several days produces progressive, additive effects such as decreased neurobehavioral alertness, decreased verbal learning, and changes in metabolic, endocrine, and immune functions, often referred to as “sleep debt” (Dinges et al., 1995, 1997; Spiegel et al., 1999; Drummond et al., 2000). Such effects might stem from adenosine receptor-mediated activation of second-messenger pathways that ultimately lead to altered transcription of genes coding for proteins that are important in the long-term effects of sleep deprivation.

The BF cholinergic zone has cells with several neurotransmitter phenotypes, including cholinergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, and peptidergic (Gritti et al., 1993; Zaborszky et al., 1999; Semba, 2000). It has not been clear whether one or more of these cell types is associated with a distinctive second-messenger profile and hence might be associated with a distinctive functional role. The A1 receptor-mediated immediate ionic effects do not appear to discriminate between cell types, because they occur in cholinergic and noncholinergic neurons, at least in the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (Rainnie et al., 1994).

Our previous identification of increased nuclear factor (NF)-κB DNA binding as a consequence of sleep deprivation and an effect mediated by the A1 receptor (Basheer et al., 2001a) suggested that we should first look at the possible signaling pathways coupling the A1 receptor to activation of this transcription factor. Several Gi/o-coupled receptors have been shown to be capable of “dual signaling” [i.e., inhibition of adenylate cyclase and stimulation of phospholipase C (PLC)] (Gudermann et al., 1996, 1997). In smooth muscle cells and astrocytes, the A1 adenosine receptor has been shown to be capable of dual signaling (Gerwins and Fredholm, 1992;Biber et al., 1997). Activation of the PLC pathway is capable of activating protein kinase C (PKC) by IP3-mediated mobilization of internal calcium (Nishizuka, 1992; Berridge, 1998). Finally, PKC-mediated phosphorylation of the inhibitor I-κB and subsequent release and nuclear translocation of NF-κB are very well characterized in T lymphocytes (McKinsey et al., 1997). However, A1 adenosine receptor-mediated activation of the PLC pathway and mobilization of intracellular calcium have not been reported in neurons, although there are reports of transient changes in intracellular calcium that can act as a part of a signal cascade coupling receptor activation to the nuclear events regulating transcription (Hardingham and Bading, 1999).

We thus chose to examine the intracellular signal transduction cascade activated by adenosine. More specifically, we investigated the following possible cascade components: whether adenosine was capable of inducing an increase in cytosolic calcium; the intracellular or extracellular source of this calcium; the involvement of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) IP3 receptor (IP3R) versus the ryanodine receptor (RyR); and the adenosine receptor type(s) mediating these effects.

We report here that in the BF, adenosine acts to mobilize cytosolic calcium in a dose-dependent manner, that this mobilization is mediated by the ER IP3R, and that these actions occur primarily through the A1 adenosine receptor. Moreover, these events occur only in cholinergic neurons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental animals. Male Long–Evans rats (350–300 gm) were housed in a 12 hr light/dark cycle (lights on 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.) at a constant temperature (23°C) with access to food and water ad libitum.

Acute brain slice preparation and loading of calcium orange dye. The animals were decapitated after isoflurane-induced anesthesia, and their brains were rapidly removed. Coronal sections (200 μm thick) were cut with a vibratome (TPI series 3000; St. Louis, MO) at 4°C in artificial CSF (aCSF; in mm: 124 NaCl, 2 KCl, 3 KH2PO4, 1.3 MgCl2, 2.5 CaCl2, 26 NaCO3, and 10 glucose, pH 7.35; 315–320 mOsm when gassed with 95% O2 and 5% CO2). Three slices per animal [bregma coordinates from 0 to 0.6 (Paxinos and Watson, 1998), including the horizontal and diagonal band (HDB)–substantia innominata (SI)–magnocellular preoptic area (MCPO) region of the BF] were collected. The slices were hemisected and mounted on Parafilm. Calcium orange dye in aCSF (1 ml; 10 μm final concentration) was layered over the brain slice and incubated for 1 hr at 21°C; slices were washed and used for drug treatment and imaging in carboxygenated buffer. Uniform loading of the dye was evident because of the visible levels of basal fluorescence of calcium orange in resting (unstimulated) neurons. Tetrodotoxin (1 μm) in the buffer was used for all of the experiments to ensure the postsynaptic nature of the effects. The real-time change in intracellular calcium fluorescence was measured every 1.37 sec to determine the time needed for maximum effect.

To test the effect of fixing the slices in neutralized formalin on the intensity of calcium orange, we performed a time-course experiment in which calcium orange-loaded slices (four slices per time point from four rats) were treated with 100 μm adenosine for 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 100 sec and fixed in formalin at the end of each time point before the fluorescence intensity was measured. The process of fixing did not have any effect on the increase in fluorescence intensity in response to adenosine. The time course of fluorescence intensity increase in fixed slices followed the same pattern that was observed in real-time measurements (Fig.1A,B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Effect of adenosine on the intracellular calcium of BF neurons. A, Typical time course of calcium increase, measured as increase in calcium orange fluorescence in a live neuron in an acute slice after treatment with 100 μmadenosine (two photon microscope measurements every 1.37 sec).Insets, Photomicrographs of a cell at the indicated time points. Note that the maximal fluorescence is achieved by 45–60 sec, and note the size of the neuron. Scale bar, 25 μm. B, Time course of fluorescence of neurons in slices fixed at various times after adenosine treatment (100 μm).Insets, Photomicrographs of neurons in slices fixed at the indicated time points. Note the close correspondence to the time course of fluorescence in an unfixed neuron (A) and the sizes of the neurons. Scale bar, 50 μm. C, Adenosine concentration–response curve: adenosine concentrations and mean ± SEM fluorescence are shown (n = 11 neurons per point). Note that the maximum response is achieved at 100 μm adenosine, the concentration chosen for other experiments.

Drugs. The sources of the drugs used were as follows: adenosine, the RyR blocker 1,1′-diheptyl-4-4′-bipyridinium (DHBP), the IP3R blocker xestospongin C, and 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborane (2APB) were obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). The A1 agonistN6-cyclo-hexyl-adenosine (CHA), A1 antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (CPT), A2 agonistN6-[2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(methylphenyl)-ethyl]adenosine (DPMA), A3 agonistN6-(4-aminobenzyl)-9-[5-(methylcarbonyl)-β-d-ribofuranosyl]adenine (AB-MECA), and A3 antagonist 3-ethyl-5-benzyl-2-methyl-4-phenylethynyl-dihydropyridine-dicarboxylate (MRS1191) were obtained from Sigma-RBI (St. Louis, MO).

Immunofluorescence labeling.Coronal sections that were used for calcium imaging were fixed in buffered formalin,pH 7.2, permeabilized with 0.5% TritonX-100in PBS under constant shaking for 2 hr, and subsequently treated with specific ChAT antibody (AB 144; goat antibody; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) used at a dilution of 1:4000. FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-goat antibody; 1:100 dilution;Chemicon) was used to visualize ChAT-positive neurons. Samples were imaged by multiphoton microscopy.

Multiphoton microscopy for intracellular calcium imaging.A Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) MRC 1024ES Multiphoton Imaging system coupled with a mode-locked Spectra-Physics (Fremont, CA) tunable Tsunami-sapphire laser system (pulse duration,<80 fsec;repetition rate,82 MHz) and a Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) Axiovert S100 inverted microscope equipped with a high-quality water immersion objective (40×; 1.2 numerical aperture) was used for quantitative fluorescence imaging of samples in epifluorescence mode. Multiphoton excitation was based on the principle that a fluorophore can absorb two or more photons essentially simultaneously and thereby undergo a transition to an excited state (Denk et al., 1995). Labeled neurons in the brain sections were identified by XYZ scanning, generally at depths of 30–170 μm. The 512 × 512 pixel images were collected in a direct detection configuration at a pixel resolution of 0.484 μm with a Kalman 3 collection filter. Multiple labeled images were acquired in separate channels using narrow bandpass filters to restrict the emission wavelength and thus avoid bleed-through of aberrant fluorescence. Images were reconstructed and processed using Bio-Rad LaserSharp and Metamorph (Universal Imaging, West Chester, PA) software. The data are presented as the average of at least three blinded experiments performed on different days.

RESULTS

Adenosine mediates cytosolic calcium increase in a time- and concentration-dependent manner

To investigate the effect of adenosine on the intracellular calcium response, brain slices were loaded with calcium orange, a calcium-sensitive fluorescent dye used previously in slices (Duffy and MacVicar, 1996). The temporal kinetics of the adenosine-mediated calcium response was examined in 18 individual neurons (n = 3 rats; three slices per rat) in real time (Fig.1A). The temporal profile of adenosine-mediated calcium mobilization after 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 100 sec of adenosine treatment (11–15 neurons per time point) was examined by measuring the fluorescence intensity after fixing the slices (four slices per time point from four rats) at the end of each time point (see Materials and Methods) (Fig. 1B). Although fixing with neutralized formalin increased the overall intensity of the fluorescence in slices, the net change (cytosolic minus background fluorescence) was found to be comparable with that observed in living neurons in real time. Similar results were obtained in calcium orange-loaded, cultured human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, in which cytosolic calcium fluorescence intensity remained stable without any leak into the medium after fixation with formalin (data not shown). In both cases (i.e., with or without fixing), the maximal (fourfold to sixfold) increase in calcium orange fluorescence was attained by 45–60 sec after adenosine treatment (Fig. 1A,B). Consequently, this time period was chosen for adenosine treatment in the rest of our experiments. As shown in Figure 1C, the intracellular calcium increased in a dose-dependent manner with increasing concentrations of adenosine, reaching a maximal effect at 100 μm. Consequently, all of the experiments described below were performed using 100 μmadenosine for 60 sec.

Adenosine-mediated cytosolic calcium increase was selective to cholinergic neurons

Interestingly, the calcium mobilization induced by adenosine in brain slices was limited to a selective subpopulation of neurons that were ∼25–35 μm in size and located in the cholinergic portion of the BF region, which includes the HDB, the SI, and the MCPO. The observation that only a limited population of cells showed calcium mobilization with adenosine treatment was intriguing. To rule out potential artifacts caused by differential loading of the dye calcium orange in a specific cell type, we examined mobilization of intracellular calcium with thapsigargin (50 μm for 60 sec), an intracellular calcium pump inhibitor that is known to release calcium from internal stores in all cell types. Subsequent immunolabeling for ChAT showed that the thapsigargin-mediated increase in calcium orange fluorescence was seen in both cholinergic and noncholinergic cells (Fig. 2,right). In contrast, only those neurons with an increase in calcium orange fluorescence in response to adenosine were ChAT-positive (Fig. 2, left). In this analysis, a total of 129 ChAT-positive neurons (average size, 31.7 ± 2.9 μm) in the HDB–SI–MCPO area of the BF were examined (seven slices). Of these, 83 neurons (64.3%) showed an adenosine-mediated increase in fluorescence, whereas the remaining 46 (35.7%) did not show an increase in fluorescence in response to adenosine. The latter appeared similar in fluorescence to ChAT-positive neurons from control slices that were loaded with the fluorescent dye but not treated with adenosine.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Adenosine-induced cytosolic calcium increase was seen only in cholinergic neurons of the BF. Left column, Effect of adenosine (60 sec) treatment. Right column, Effects of thapsigargin (60 sec) treatment. Top, The calcium orange fluorescence retained in the neurons after immunolabeling for ChAT. Middle, Immunolabeling of the same neurons for ChAT, detected using FITC-conjugated secondary antibody. Bottom, Overlay showing double fluorescence. Note the presence of calcium fluorescence primarily in cholinergic neurons with adenosine (yellow arrowhead). One cholinergic neuron in A (white arrowhead) does not show calcium orange fluorescence. Calcium orange fluorescence is increased in thapsigargin-treated slices (B) in both cholinergic (yellow arrowhead) and noncholinergic (white arrowhead) cells. Images were acquired separately in each channel (dual-scan mode) to eliminate the possibility of signal bleed-over from one channel to another.

An A1-selective agonist largely mimicked the pattern of adenosine response

The increase in intracellular calcium in response to adenosine (100 μm; n = 51) was measured in individual neurons in slices, as were the responses to the A1 receptor-selective agonist CHA (100 nm; n = 22), the A2-selective agonist DPMA (100 nm; n = 11), and the A3-selective agonist AB-MECA (10 nm; n = 33) (Fig. 3A). At these concentrations, these agonists have been shown to have relatively high selectivity for their respective receptor subtypes (Klotz, 2000). A Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA showed significant differences among the treatment groups (H = 115.054; df = 4;p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis (Dunn's method) showed a significant increase (p < 0.05) in cytosolic calcium with adenosine, CHA, or AB-MECA treatment compared with controls (nonstimulated basal-level fluorescence;n = 45). The observed fivefold increase in fluorescence with adenosine treatment was closely matched by application of the A1-selective agonist CHA. The A3-selective agonist induced only a twofold increase in fluorescence compared with controls. The fluorescence in the cells treated with the A2-selective agonist DPMA was not significantly different from controls.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cytosolic calcium increase in response to different adenosine (AD) receptor agonists:A, A significant increase in cytosolic calcium fluorescence was observed in response to adenosine. A similar response was obtained by treatment with the A1 agonist CHA compared with controls (p < 0.01). There was a twofold increase in cytosolic calcium fluorescence with treatment with the A3 agonist AB-MECA versus controls (p < 0.05), whereas the A2agonist DPMA had no significant effect. B, The effect of adenosine was significantly but partially blocked by pretreatment of slices with the A1-selective antagonist CPT (significantly lower than adenosine treatments but higher than controls;p < 0.05). However, combined use of CPT and the A3-selective antagonist MRS1191 rendered the adenosine response not significantly different from controls. Theasterisks describe a significant difference when compared with controls.

Figure 3B shows that although the effect of adenosine was not blocked completely, it was primarily blocked by pretreatment of the slices with the A1-selective antagonist CPT (1 μm; n = 58). The effect was blocked completely when both CPT (1 μm) and the A3-selective antagonist MRS1191 (100 nm; n = 58) were used (differences between the treatment groups were statistically significant as determined by Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric ANOVA; H = 97.252; df = 3; p < 0.001).

Adenosine-mediated cytosolic calcium increase is caused by release from an intracellular thapsigargin-sensitive calcium store

Increases in cytoplasmic calcium can be a result of influx of external calcium or release from intracellular stores. To determine whether the increase in cytosolic calcium was a result of influx from the external medium, the calcium orange-loaded slices were treated with adenosine in calcium-free buffer. The increases in cytosolic calcium in response to adenosine, CHA, and AB-MECA in cells stimulated in calcium-free medium were not significantly different from that seen in the presence of calcium in the external medium (illustrated in Fig.4A; a Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA confirmed the visual impression by a statistically significant difference between the calcium and the no-calcium treatment groups: H = 173.777; df = 9; p < 0.001). This suggested that the source of calcium was from internal stores.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The adenosine (AD)-induced cytosolic increase in calcium is independent of calcium in the external medium. A, The changes in cytosolic fluorescence intensity were compared for slices in the presence and absence of calcium in the external medium for each treatment group.Filledbars denote the values observed in the presence of calcium, and open bars represent the values obtained in calcium-free medium. Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA showed statistically significant differences between the groups (H = 173.77; df = 9; p < 0.001; post hoc analysis by Dunn's method was done for comparison of different treatment groups vs controls). Note that treatment with the adenosine A1agonist CHA as well as treatment with the A3 agonist AB-MECA resulted in increased mobilization of cytosolic calcium regardless of the presence of calcium in the external medium.B, Pretreatment of slices with 50 μmthapsigargin to deplete internal stores of calcium abolished the response to adenosine (p < 0.01). The asterisks describe a significant difference when compared with controls.

In a separate experiment, depletion of the internal stores by pretreatment of slices with thapsigargin failed to show a calcium response measured after 60 sec of adenosine treatment (H = 45.987; df = 2; p < 0.001) (Fig. 4B). This also confirmed that the adenosine-mediated increase in cytosolic calcium was a result of mobilization from an internal source.

Adenosine-mediated calcium release from IP3R but not RyR regulated intracellular stores

In neurons, a major source of internal calcium is the stores present in the elaborately distributed network of the ER. Both IP3Rs and RyRs distributed throughout the ER are responsible for releasing calcium from this internal source (Kostyuk and Verkhratsky, 1994; Simpson et al., 1995). To determine whether both or either one of these was responsible for the release of internal calcium, we examined the effect of blocking each of those receptors on cytosolic calcium increase in response to adenosine. Three slices per pharmacological agent were pretreated with DHBP (30 μg/ml), a potent antagonist of RyRs (Kang et al., 1994); xestospongin C (20 μm), a potent cell-permeable blocker of IP3R (Gafni et al., 1997); and 2APB (50 μm), a functional and membrane-permeable IP3R antagonist (Hamada et al., 1999) for 10 min. The drug treatment alone did not produce any increase in the fluorescence. Blocking of RyR with DHBP (n = 15) did not prevent an adenosine-mediated increase in fluorescence, whereas treatment of the slice with either of the IP3R blockers (xestospongin C, n = 26; 2APB,n = 18) significantly reduced the increase in fluorescence seen with adenosine (H = 55.864; df = 4;p < 0.001) (Fig. 5). These results suggested that adenosine mobilizes intracellular calcium primarily via IP3Rs and not via RyRs.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Inhibition of IP3R but not RyR blocks the effect of adenosine (AD) on intracellular calcium. A significant increase in intracellular calcium by adenosine (p < 0.01) was unaffected when RyR activity was blocked by DHBP. Conversely, blocking the IP3R with xestospongin C (XeC) or 2APB led to no response to adenosine treatment. The difference between the groups was significant by Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA (H = 55.864; df = 4;p < 0.001; Dunn's post hocanalysis was done for multiple comparisons vs controls). Theasterisks describe a significant difference when compared with controls.

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrated that adenosine stimulated cytosolic calcium increases in a subpopulation of cholinergic neurons in the BF of rats. This intracellular calcium increase was a result of internal release, primarily via IP3Rs, in the absence of calcium influx. The response to adenosine was mediated predominantly by A1 receptors, with a smaller but significant contribution by A3 adenosine receptors. Both A1 and A3 receptors are coupled to inhibitory G-proteins. Although there is evidence in the literature for A3 receptor-mediated activation of IP3 production and calcium mobilization in neurons (Abbracchio et al., 1995) and for A1receptor-mediated calcium signaling in smooth muscle cells and astrocytes (Gerwins and Fredholm, 1992; Biber et al., 1997), this report is the first, to the best of our knowledge, to show A1 receptor-mediated mobilization of IP3-regulated intracellular calcium in a subpopulation of cholinergic neurons in the BF.

Our data demonstrated that adenosine induced a relatively slow release of intracellular calcium from internal calcium stores and that it occurred at higher concentrations of adenosine. The time course of calcium increase was similar to that in other reports on PLC-linked G-protein-coupled receptors, such as metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 and the angiotensin II receptor (Ceolotto et al., 2001; Nash et al., 2001). The fact that IP3-dependent mobilization of intracellular calcium is dependent on a high concentration of adenosine, similar to what has been described in astrocytes by Biber et al. (1997), supports the notion that increased agonist, and a consequently higher number of stimulated receptors, would release a larger number of G-protein βγ subunits and thus potentiate the activation of PLC (Camps et al., 1992). Recently, G-protein βγ subunit-mediated activation of PLC and a subsequent increase in cytosolic calcium caused by release from internal stores has been reported for G1-coupled dopamine D2 receptors in the striatum (Hernández-López et al., 2000). In neurons, the ER contributes significantly to the dynamics of calcium signaling by acting as either a source or a sink of calcium (Simpson et al., 1995;Berridge, 1998, 2000). Both IP3Rs and RyRs are widely distributed in brain ER and can influence the release of internal calcium (McPherson et al., 1991; Seymour-Laurent and Barish, 1995). Our results strongly suggest that adenosine-dependent calcium increase in cholinergic neurons is mediated via IP3Rs.

Calcium mobilization in cholinergic neurons of the BF

The selectivity of adenosine-induced calcium mobilization in cholinergic neurons is of interest in disambiguating the roles of different neurotransmitter phenotypes in the BF. That the increase in intracellular calcium fluorescence was always in cholinergic neurons suggested a selective functional recruitment of a subpopulation of cholinergic neurons in the BF. Recently, selective actions of galanin on cholinergic versus noncholinergic neurons in the HDB of the BF have been noted (Jhamandas et al., 2002). The cholinergic neurons examined in this study belong to part of the HDB, SI, and MCPO. These cholinergic neurons target both the neocortex and amygdala and regulate aspects of arousal, cognition, attention, and emotion (Szymusiak, 1995;Semba, 2000). Several approaches toward disentangling the anatomy of the cholinergic subpopulations have been adopted; for example, neurochemical distinctions may be based on the immunohistochemical studies for the coexpression of several neuropeptides (for review, seeSemba, 2000). Recently, a functional correlation based on the firing pattern of cholinergic neurons was used to determine the projections to the retrosplenial or prefrontal cortex in separate sets of cholinergic neurons in the BF (Manns et al., 2000). Our data point to a large population (65%) of cholinergic neurons with a unique biochemical response to adenosine of calcium mobilization from internal stores.

An interesting question is the possible mechanism(s) by which the adenosine receptor, particularly the A1 receptor, known for its wide presence on all types of cells, exhibits a selective biochemical response in cholinergic neurons. Site- and context-specific differential activation of G-protein-coupled receptors has been posited to occur as a result of different molecular interactions, either by homodimerization–heterodimerization or interactions with accessory proteins to influence the activity of the receptor (for review, seeBouvier, 2001). In particular, A1 adenosine receptor function can be influenced by a homodimer (Ciruela et al., 1995), by a heterodimer (Gines et al., 2000; Ciruela et al., 2001), and by interaction with ectoadenosine deaminase (Franco et al., 1997).

We suggest that it is unlikely that the selectivity to cholinergic neurons is artifactual. The fact that thapsigargin treatment could elicit similar responses in all types of cells strongly supports our suggestion. Notably, our data also show that the dye calcium orange might be particularly useful for subsequent immunochemistry to identify the responding cholinergic neurons. This feature of calcium orange most likely relates to its high photostability and membrane impermeability after de-esterification in cytoplasm (Eberhard and Erne, 1991; Thomas et al., 2000). Our results suggested that calcium orange retains its place within the neuron even after fixation with formalin as a fixative. We observed that calcium orange-loaded neurons could be fixed without apparent leak of fluorescence outside the cells, because there was no “aura” around neurons and no increase in background after 1 and 24 hr of formalin treatment. Similar observations have been reported for another fluorescent dye, Lucifer yellow (Stewart, 1978). Moreover, fixation of the slices also did not alter the fluorescence inside the cells, because the adenosine-induced increase in fluorescence after fixation was the same as that observed in real time. Similar results were obtained in calcium orange-loaded cultured HEK 293 cells, in which cytosolic calcium fluorescence intensity remained stable, without any leak into the medium, after fixation with formalin (data not shown).

Calcium signaling and transcription

Calcium signals induce gene expression that may be important for long-lasting adaptations (Bading, 2000; Mattson et al., 2000;Mellström and Naranjo, 2001). Such a role for calcium is well described in the nervous system, in which transient changes in intracellular calcium can produce distinct transcriptional responses (Bading et al., 1993; Ghosh and Greenberg, 1995). Calcium changes also regulate the transcription factor NF-κB (Dolmetsch et al., 1998). We have reported previously that adenosine treatment of brain slices resulted in nuclear translocation of NF-κB in the BF, a phenomenon also observed after 3 hr of sleep deprivation (Basheer et al., 2001a). Together, these observations support the idea that increased levels of extracellular adenosine (as present with sleep deprivation) may preferentially activate the PLC pathway to mobilize internal calcium, then activate PKC, which is shown to induce nuclear translocation of NF-κB in lymphocytes (Nishizuka, 1992; Finco and Baldwin, 1995).

A link between sleep deprivation-induced adenosine increase and NF-κB activation

The behavioral significance of these results may be best understood in the context of sleep deprivation and its long-term effects. Our previous reports showed a unique pattern of sleep deprivation-induced increases in extracellular adenosine as well as its effect on A1 adenosine receptor activation of transcription factor NF-κB in the BF (Porkka-Heiskanen et al., 1997,2000; Basheer et al., 2000, 2001a). One of the questions generated from those studies was the identity of the signal transduction pathway linking the increased levels of extracellular adenosine with the PKC-dependent induction of NF-κB (Finco and Baldwin, 1995). Our results have provided evidence that adenosine can mobilize IP3-regulated intracellular calcium, which may help the activation of NF-κB. NF-κB, in turn, may be involved in the expression of genes, including that of the A1receptor, which is upregulated with sleep deprivation (Basheer et al., 2001b) and which may play a role in mediating the longer-term effects of sleep deprivation.

Finally, we believe that these observations help in understanding the complex organization of the BF by providing a biochemical distinction for a major subgroup of cholinergic neurons; these neurons may play a specific role in mediating some of the longer-term effects of sleep deprivation-induced adenosine in the BF.

Footnotes

This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH 39683 and awards from the Veterans Administration to R.W.M. and from the Sleep Medicine Education Research Foundation to R.B. We thank Dr. Aldebaran M. Hofer for providing HEK 293 cells and helpful suggestions and Dr. Matthew Palmer for designing the slice chamber.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Robert W. McCarley, Harvard Medical School and Boston Veterans Affairs HealthCare System, Psychiatry, 116A, 940 Belmont Street, Brockton, MA 02301. E-mail:Robert_mccarley@hms.harvard.edu.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abbracchio MP, Brambilla R, Ceruti S, Kim HO, von Lubitz DK, Jacobson KA, Cattabeni F. G protein-dependent activation of phospholipase C by adenosine A3 receptors in rat brain. Mol Pharmacol. 1995;48:1038–1045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bading H. Transcription-dependent neuronal plasticity: the nuclear calcium hypothesis. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:5280–5283. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01565.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bading H, Ginty DD, Greenberg ME. Regulation of gene expression in hippocampal neurons by distinct calcium signaling pathways. Science. 1993;260:181–186. doi: 10.1126/science.8097060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Basheer R, Porkka-Heiskanen T, Stenberg D, McCarley RW. Adenosine and behavioral state control: adenosine increases c-Fos protein and AP1 binding in basal forebrain of rats. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1999;73:1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(99)00219-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Basheer R, Porkka-Heiskanen T, Strecker RE, Thakkar MM, McCarley RW. Adenosine as a biological signal mediating sleepiness following prolonged wakefulness. Biol Signals Recept. 2000;9:319–327. doi: 10.1159/000014655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Basheer R, Rainnie DG, Porkka-Heiskanen T, Ramesh V, McCarley RW. Adenosine, prolonged wakefulness, and A1-activated NF-κB DNA binding in the basal forebrain of the rat. Neuroscience. 2001a;104:731–739. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00111-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Basheer R, Halldner L, Alanko L, McCarley RW, Fredholm BB, Porkka-Heiskanen T. Opposite changes in adenosine A1 and A2A receptor mRNA in the rat following sleep deprivation. NeuroReport. 2001b;12:1577–1580. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200106130-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berridge MJ. Neuronal calcium signaling. Neuron. 1998;21:13–26. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80510-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:11–21. doi: 10.1038/35036035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Biber K, Klotz KN, Berger M, Gebicke-Harter PJ, van Calker D. Adenosine A1 receptor-mediated activation of phospholipase C in cultured astrocytes depends on the level of receptor expression. J Neurosci. 1997;17:4956–4964. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-13-04956.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bouvier M. Oligomerization of G-protein-coupled transmitter receptors. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:274–286. doi: 10.1038/35067575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Camps M, Carozzi A, Schnabel P, Scheer A, Parker PJ, Gierschik P. Isozyme-selective stimulation of phospholipase C-β2 by G protein βγ-subunits. Nature. 1992;360:684–686. doi: 10.1038/360684a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ceolotto G, Valente R, Baritono E, Reato S, Iori E, Monari A, Trevisan R, Semplicini A. Effect of insulin and angiotensin II on cell calcium in human skin fibroblasts. Hypertension. 2001;37:1486–1491. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.6.1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ciruela F, Casado V, Mallol J, Canela EI, Lluis C, Franco R. Immunological identification of A1 adenosine receptors in brain cortex. J Neurosci Res. 1995;42:818–828. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490420610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ciruela F, Escriche M, Burgueño J, Angulo E, Casado V, Soloviev MM, Canela EI, Mallol J, Chan W-Y, Lluis L, McIlhinney JRA, Franco R. Metabotropic glutamate 1α and adenosine A1 receptors assemble into functionally interacting complexes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:18345–18351. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006960200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Denk W, Piston DW, Webb W. Two photon molecular excitation in laser scanning microscopy. In: Pawley J, editor. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy, Ed 2. Plenum; New York: 1995. pp. 445–458. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dinges DF, Douglas SD, Hamarman S, Zaugg L, Kapoor S. Sleep deprivation and human immune function. Adv Neuroimmunol. 1995;5:97–110. doi: 10.1016/0960-5428(95)00002-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dinges DF, Pack F, Williams K, Gillen KA, Powell JW, Ott GE, Aptowicz C, Pack AI. Cumulative sleepiness, mood disturbance, and psychomotor vigilance performance decrements during a week of sleep restricted to 4–5 hours per night. Sleep. 1997;20:267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dolmetsch RE, Lewis RS, Goodnow CC, Healy JI. Differential activation of transcription factors induced by Ca2+ response amplitude and duration. Nature. 1998;386:759–760. doi: 10.1038/386855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Drummond SP, Brown GG, Gillin JC, Stricker JL, Wong EC, Buxton RB. Altered brain response to verbal learning following sleep deprivation. Nature. 2000;403:655–657. doi: 10.1038/35001068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Duffy S, MacVicar BA. In vitro ischemia promotes calcium influx and intracellular calcium release in hippocampal astrocytes. J Neurosci. 1996;16:71–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-01-00071.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eberhard M, Erne P. Calcium binding to fluorescent calcium indicators: calcium green, calcium orange, and calcium crimson. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;180:209–215. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(05)81278-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Finco TS, Baldwin AS. Mechanistic aspects of NF-κB regulation: the emerging role of phosphorylation and proteolysis. Immunity. 1995;3:263–272. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Franco R, Casadò V, Ciruela F, Saura C, Mallol J, Canela EI, Lluis C. Cell surface adenosine deaminase: much more than an ectoenzyme. Prog Neurobiol. 1997;52:283–294. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gafni J, Munsch JA, Lam TH, Catlin MC, Costa LG, Molinski TF, Pessah IN. Xestospongins: potent membrane permeable blockers of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. Neuron. 1997;19:723–733. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80384-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gerwins P, Fredholm BB. ATP and its metabolite adenosine act synergistically to mobilize intracellular calcium via the formation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate in a smooth muscle cell line. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:16081–16087. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ghosh A, Greenberg ME. Calcium signaling in neurons: molecular mechanisms and cellular consequences. Science. 1995;268:239–247. doi: 10.1126/science.7716515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gines S, Hillion J, Torvinen M, Le Crom S, Casado V, Canela EI, Rondin S, Lew JY, Watson S, Zoli M, Agnati LF, Verniera P, Lluis C, Ferre S, Fuxe K, Franco R. Dopamine D1 and adenosine A1 receptors form functionally interacting heteromeric complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8606–8611. doi: 10.1073/pnas.150241097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gritti I, Mainville L, Jones BE. Codistribution of GABA- with acetylcholine-synthesizing neurons in the basal forebrain of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1993;329:438–457. doi: 10.1002/cne.903290403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gudermann T, Kalkbrenner F, Schultz G. Diversity and selectivity of receptor-G protein interaction. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996;36:429–459. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.36.040196.002241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gudermann T, Schoneberg T, Schultz G. Functional and structural complexity of signal transduction via G-protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:399–427. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Haas HL, Selbach O. Functions of neuronal adenosine receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2000;362:375–381. doi: 10.1007/s002100000314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hamada T, Liou SY, Fukushima T, Maruyama T, Watanabe S, Mikoshiba K, Ishida N. The role of inositol trisphosphate-induced Ca2+ release from IP3-receptor in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus on circadian entrainment mechanism. Neurosci Lett. 1999;263:125–128. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00111-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hardingham GE, Bading H. Calcium as a versatile second messenger in the control of gene expression. Microsc Res Tech. 1999;46:348–355. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19990915)46:6<348::AID-JEMT3>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hernández-López S, Tkatch T, Perez-Garci E, Galarraga E, Bargas J, Hamm H, Surmeier JD. D2 dopamine receptors in striatal medium spiny neurons reduce L-type Ca2+ currents and excitability via a novel PLCβ1-IP3-calcineurin signaling cascade. J Neurosci. 2000;20:8987–8995. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-08987.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jhamandas JH, Harris KH, MacTavish D, Jassar BS. Novel excitatory actions of galanin on rat cholinergic basal forebrain neurons: implications for its role in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:696–704. doi: 10.1152/jn.00416.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kang JJ, Hsu KS, Lin-Shiau SY. Effects of bipyridylium compounds on calcium release from triadic vesicles isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 1994;112:1216–1222. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb13213.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Klotz KN. Adenosine receptors and their ligands. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2000;362:382–391. doi: 10.1007/s002100000315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kostyuk P, Verkhratsky A. Calcium stores in neurons and glia. Neuroscience. 1994;63:381–404. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90537-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Manns ID, Alonso A, Jones BE. Discharge properties of juxtacellularly labeled and immunohistochemically identified cholinergic basal forebrain neurons recorded in association with the electroencephalogram in anesthetized rats. J Neurosci. 2000;20:1505–1518. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-04-01505.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mattson MP, LaFerla FM, Chan SL, Leissring MA, Shepel PN, Geiger JD. Calcium signaling in the ER: its role in neuronal plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:222–229. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01548-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McKinsey TA, Chu ZL, Ballard DW. Phosphorylation of the PEST domain of IκBβ regulates the function of NF-κB/IκBβ complexes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:22377–22380. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.36.22377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McPherson PS, Kim YK, Valdivia H, Knudson CM, Takekura H, Franzini-Armstrong C, Coronado R, Campbell KP. The brain ryanodine receptor: a caffeine-sensitive calcium release channel. Neuron. 1991;7:17–25. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90070-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mellström B, Naranjo JR. Mechanisms of Ca2+-dependent transcription. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;11:312–319. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00213-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nash MS, Young KW, Challiss RA, Nahorski SR. Intracellular signalling: receptor-specific messenger oscillations. Nature. 2001;413:381–382. doi: 10.1038/35096643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nishizuka Y. Intracellular signaling by hydrolysis of phospholipids and activation of protein kinase C. Science. 1992;258:607–614. doi: 10.1126/science.1411571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic; New York: 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Porkka-Heiskanen T, Strecker RE, Thakkar M, Bjorkum AA, Greene RW, McCarley RW. Adenosine: a mediator of the sleep-inducing effects of prolonged wakefulness. Science. 1997;276:1265–1268. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Porkka-Heiskanen T, Strecker RE, McCarley RW. Brain site-specificity of extracellular adenosine concentration changes during sleep deprivation and spontaneous sleep: an in vivo microdialysis study. Neuroscience. 2000;99:507–517. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00220-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rainnie DG, Grunze HC, McCarley RW, Greene RW. Adenosine inhibition of mesopontine cholinergic neurons: implications for EEG arousal. Science. 1994;263:689–692. doi: 10.1126/science.8303279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Semba K. Multiple output pathways of the basal forebrain: organization, chemical heterogeneity, and roles in vigilance. Behav Brain Res. 2000;115:117–141. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00254-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Seymour-Laurent KJ, Barish ME. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and ryanodine receptor distributions and patterns of acetylcholine- and caffeine-induced calcium release in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 1995;15:2592–2608. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-02592.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Simpson PB, Challiss RA, Nahorski SR. Neuronal Ca2+ stores: activation and function. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:299–306. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93919-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet. 1999;354:1435–1439. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01376-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stewart WW. Functional connections between cells as revealed by dye-coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalimide tracer. Cell. 1978;14:741–759. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90256-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Szymusiak R. Magnocellular nuclei of the basal forebrain: substrates of sleep and arousal regulation. Sleep. 1995;18:478–500. doi: 10.1093/sleep/18.6.478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Thomas D, Tovey SC, Collins TJ, Bootman MD, Berridge MJ, Lipp P. A comparison of fluorescent Ca2+ indicator properties and their use in measuring elementary and global Ca2+ signals. Cell Calcium. 2000;28:213–223. doi: 10.1054/ceca.2000.0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zaborszky L, Pang K, Somogyi J, Nadasdy Z, Kallo I. The basal forebrain corticopetal system revisited. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999;877:339–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuroscience

RESOURCES