Abstract
Gene expression can be modulated by chromatin changes induced by histone acetylation and deacetylation. Acetylation of histone lysine residues by acetyltransferases is associated with transcriptionally active chromatin, whereas the removal of acetyl groups by histone deacetylases (HDACs) correlates with repressed chromatin. Recent evidence has shown that histone deacetylation is responsible for restricting neuronal gene expression, whereas histone acetylation is necessary for astrocytic differentiation We now asked whether histone acetylation or deacetylation was necessary for oligodendrocyte differentiation. Neonatal rat cortical progenitors were kept proliferating and undifferentiated in the presence of mitogens and induced to stop proliferating and differentiate into oligodendrocytes by mitogen removal. Histone deacetylation was observed during the temporal window between exit from the cell cycle and onset of differentiation, which was characterized by acquisition of branched morphology and myelin gene expression. Blocking HDAC activity during this critical window using the inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) prevented the progression of progenitors into mature oligodendrocytes. TSA-treated progenitors were able to exit from the cell cycle but did not progress to oligodendrocytes. Their development was arrested at the progenitor stage, characterized by simple morphology and lack of myelin gene expression. The effect of TSA on progenitor differentiation was lineage specific, because TSA did not affect the ability of these cells to differentiate into type II astrocytes when cultured in the presence of serum. From these data, we conclude that histone deacetylation is a necessary component of the oligodendrocyte differentiation program.
Keywords: myelin, differentiation, transcription, trichostatin A, chromatin, development
The complexity of the mammalian brain results from the activation of genetic differentiation programs leading to three distinct cell types: neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Our laboratory has been interested in defining the mechanisms responsible for oligodendrocyte differentiation and their relationship to cell cycle exit. Several studies have shown that progenitors remain undifferentiated when cultured in the presence of mitogens and differentiate into oligodendrocytes in response to mitogen withdrawal (Noble and Murray, 1984; Temple and Raff, 1985; Gard and Pfeiffer, 1993; Bansal and Pfeiffer, 1997). This suggested the existence of an obligate relationship between cell cycle exit and oligodendrocyte differentiation. Furthermore, the defective differentiation observed in oligodendrocyte progenitors isolated from mice with targeted deletion of genes encoding for cell cycle inhibitors (Casaccia-Bonnefil et al., 1997; Durand et al., 1998; Zezula et al., 2001) reinforced this concept and suggested that cell cycle exit was the driving force for differentiation. This hypothesis was tested by overexpressing specific cell cycle inhibitors in proliferating progenitors (Tikoo et al., 1998; Tang et al., 1999). Although proliferation stopped by increasing the levels of cell cycle inhibitors, progenitors were unable to progress to oligodendrocytes. Together, these studies suggested that cell cycle exit was necessary, but not sufficient, to induce differentiation.
Because the proliferative state of a cell is associated with changes of chromatin components, we asked whether modification of nucleosomal histones, the basic unit of chromatin, would be a necessary element for the activation of the oligodendrocyte differentiation program. Nucleosomes are composed of a core octamer of histones called H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, and 146 base pairs of DNA are wrapped around them. The N-terminal tail of nucleosomal histones is rich in lysine residues, which are targets for acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) (Csordas, 1990). Acetylation of these lysine residues represents a very efficient way to loosen the interaction between histones and DNA and is generally associated with active transcription (Ashraf and Ip, 1998; Struhl, 1998). Conversely, deacetylation of lysine residues favors compaction of chromatin, making the access of the transcriptional apparatus to nearby promoters more difficult and therefore decreasing promoter basal activity (Jeong and Stein, 1994; Roth and Allis, 1996; Svaren and Horz, 1996).
Recruitment of the histone deacetylase activity HDAC to the promoter of neuronal genes has been shown to be essential for the repression of these genes in non-neuronal cells (Chong et al., 1995; Schoenherr and Anderson, 1995). A transcriptional factor called REST is responsible for repressing the neuronal phenotype by recruiting a large complex containing the HDAC and other repressors to negative regulatorycis-elements (RE-1) in the promoter of neuronal-specific genes (Ballas et al., 2001). Decreased expression of REST in postmitotic neurons results in the disruption of these chromatin modifier complexes and allows expression of neuronal genes (Griffith et al., 2001).
Conversely, recruitment of other chromatin modifiers, such as the p300 histone acetyltransferase, has been involved in the differentiation of astrocytes or neurons from neural stem cells (Nakashima et al., 1999;Sun et al., 2001). During astrocytic differentiation, for instance, p300 is part of a complex with other transcriptional activators, and the complex is responsible for the activation of the expression of glial fibrillary protein (GFAP) (Nakashima et al., 1999). Similarly, in differentiating neurons, p300 is part of a complex with general transcription factors and neurogenins, and this complex activates the expression of neural-specific genes, such as NeuroD (Sun et al., 2001)
We now asked whether histone acetylation is also part of the mechanism responsible for the differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antibodies. Antibodies against histones H3, H4, H2A, and H2B were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), anti-acetyl lysine and acetylated histones H3 and H4 were from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY), anti-HMGN1 (high-motility group N 1) and anti-HMGN2 were kindly provided by Dr. M. Bustin (Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), anti-actin antibodies were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), anti-GalC was from Cedar Lane (Ontario, Canada), and anti-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and anti-GFAP were from Dako (Carpinteria, CA). A2B5 or O4 antibodies were generated from hybridoma cells provided by Dr. R. Bansal (University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT), whereas the antibody against proteolipid protein (PLP) was a gift from Dr. K. Nave (Max Planck Institute, Gottingen, Germany). Secondary antibodies for Western blots were obtained from Promega (Madison, WI). Secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorescein and rhodamine used for immunohistochemistry were obtained from Southern Biotechnologies (Birmingham, AL), Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ), Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA), and Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA).
Cell culture. Oligodendrocyte progenitors were isolated from the cortex of postnatal day 1 rats and cultured according to McCarthy and de Vellis (1980). Cells were maintained proliferating and undifferentiated by the addition of basic FGF (bFGF) (20 ng/ml) in Sato medium (DMEM, 100 μg/ml albumin, 100 μg/ml apo-transferrin, 16 μg/ml putrescine, 0.06 ng/ml progesterone, 40 ng/ml selenium, 5 μg/ml insulin, 1 mm sodium pyruvate, 2 mml-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin). The removal of bFGF from the medium (mitogen withdrawal) was considered as the start of differentiation.
Trichostatin A treatment and BrdU incorporation. Cells were cultured in the presence of bFGF and then induced to differentiate for different time intervals by removing the mitogen from the medium in the presence or absence of trichostatin A (TSA) (Sigma). Typically, TSA was used at a concentration of 10 ng/ml in all of the experiments, except for the dose–response experiment when 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/ml were tested. The effect of TSA treatment on the ability of the cell to synthesize DNA (S phase) was evaluated by labeling with 10 μm BrdU (Sigma) during the 6 hr before the end of the experiment. Labeling experiments, therefore, was started at time 0 for the 6 hr sample, at 6 hr for the 12 hr sample, at 18 hr for the 24 hr sample, and at 42 hr for the 48 hr sample. At the indicated times, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for immunocytochemistry. Cells synthesizing DNA were identified by positive immunoreactivity for BrdU as described previously (Casaccia-Bonnefil et al., 1997, 1999).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis. Whole cell lysates were prepared from proliferating progenitors (cultured in bFGF) or from differentiating cells (6, 24, and 48 hr after mitogen withdrawal). Cells were lysed in a buffer containing 50 mm HEPES, pH 7.0, 250 mmNaCl, 0.15% Nonidet P-40, 1 mm DTT, 1 mm EDTA, 0.01% PMSF, 1 mmaprotinin, and 1 mm leupeptin (Zhang et al., 2000) for 15 min on ice. Lysates were further disrupted by serial passages through syringes equipped with different sized needles (18G11/2, 22G11/2, and 26G3/8), followed by sonication on ice at the highest output (three times, 30 sec each, cells were kept on ice for 30 sec between each pulse). Equal amounts of protein (150 μg) were separated on a 15% SDS-PAGE and transferred, at 30 V for 16–18 hr, onto a 0.22 μm nitrocellulose membrane using a buffer containing 25 mm Tris base, 192 mmglycine, 20% v/v methanol, and 0.04% SDS, pH 8.3. Western blot analysis was performed as reported previously (Casaccia-Bonnefil et al., 1996, 1997, 1999) using the appropriate dilutions of primary and secondary antibodies. Equal protein loading was guaranteed by probing the blots with anti-actin antibodies. For protein immunoprecipitation experiments, equal amounts of protein (150 μg) were immunoprecipitated for 16–18 hr at 4°C using 1 μg of anti-acetyl lysine antibodies (Upstate Biotechnology). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, as described above, followed by Western blot analysis with antibodies against histone H3 (FL-136; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), histone H4 (H-97; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), histone H2A (H-124; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), histone H2B (FL-126; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or antiserum against HMGN1 and HMGN2 (Dr. M. Bustin). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, followed by chemiluminescence. Typically, three to four separate experiments were conducted using cell lysates obtained from three different culture preparations. Changes in protein acetylation were evaluated by scanning the acetylated bands and the actin band with a densitometer (model 300A; Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and normalizing proteins by actin content. The acetylation of the bands observed in the presence of mitogens was considered as 100%, and the values obtained for each of the other time points were described as a percentage of this value.
Reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA was isolated using a RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany); 1.5 μg of total RNA was used in 40 μl of reverse transcription (RT) reaction, using a GeneAmp RT-PCR kit (Roche Products, Hertforshire, UK). The RT-PCR was performed in a 20 μl reaction mixture containing 2 μl of cDNA as template and 0.1 μm specific oligonucleotide primer pair. Cycle parameters were 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 50°C, and 1.5 min at 72°C for 22 cycles. The following oligonucleotide DNA primers were used: for rat PLP, the 5′ primer was 5′-GGGTTTGTTAGAGTGCTGTGCTA-3′, and the 3′ was 5′-CCATGAGTTTAAGGACGGCAA-3′; for rat ceramyl-galactosyl transferase (CGT) the 5′ primer was 5′-GGAGTGCTGTTGGAATAGCAA-3′, and the 3′ was 5′-CGTACTCCTAGAACACAGACTT-3′; for rat β-actin, the 5′ primer was 5′-TGGAATCCTGTGGCATCC-3′ and the 3′ primer was 5′-TCGTACTCCTGCTTGCTG-3′; and for p21, the 5′ primer was 5′-GTCCGATCCTGGTGATGTCCGA-3′ and the 3′ was 5′-GCTTTCTCTTGCAGAAGACCAA-3′.
Immunocytochemistry. Cells were grown on Permanox chambers for all immunocytochemistry. For oligodendrocyte lineage markers as A2B5, O4, and GalC, coverslips were rinsed gently with PBS (10 mm sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, and 150 mm NaCl) and incubated with hybridoma supernatant (diluted 1:1) for 30 min at 37°C. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. For staining with antibodies against PLP or GFAP, the fixed cells were first incubated in blocking solution (0.1 mphosphate buffer, 0.1% gelatin, 1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.002% sodium azide) with 10% normal goat serum (NGS) (Vector Laboratories) and then typically incubated overnight in primary antibody diluted 1:1000. After incubation with the biotinylated secondary (1:200) for 1 hr at room temperature, immunolabeled cells were visualized using avidin conjugated with specific fluorochromes (diluted 1:500). For double immunocytochemistry with anti-BrdU antibodies, after staining, the first antibody cells were treated with 2N HCl for 10 min at room temperature, followed by neutralization in 0.1 msodium borate, pH 8.6, for 10 min, and then they were incubated in anti-BrdU (1:100). Cells on the chamber slides were counterstained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1:1000; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) to visualize cell nuclei. Labeled cells were counted in at least three fields, from two or three different experiments performed in duplicate, at 40× using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica, Nussloch, Germany). Cells were counted and classified according to one of the following morphologies: simple, cells are either bipolar or stellate composed exclusively of short primary branches; intermediate, defined by the presence of very long primary branches and or secondary branches; or complex morphology, defined by the presence of tertiary branches. The relative contribution of each category to the whole cell population was calculated, statistically analyzed, and represented in a graph.
RESULTS
Histone deacetylation, rather than acetylation, occurs during a specific temporal window of oligodendrocyte development
To investigate whether changes in the acetylation of nucleosomal histones occurred during oligodendrocyte lineage progression, we established primary cultures of neonatal rat cortical progenitors and induced them to differentiate by removing the mitogens from the culture medium (Casaccia-Bonnefil et al., 1997). The advantage of such an experimental system is the possibility to follow in vitrothe same sequence of events observed during lineage progressionin vivo, although within a much shorter time frame (Noble and Murray, 1984; Temple and Raff, 1985; Gard and Pfeiffer, 1993). When cultured in the presence of mitogens, progenitors proliferate and can be identified by a simple bipolar or stellate morphology and positive immunoreactivity for the progenitor markers A2B5 and O4 (Fig.1A). On mitogen removal, cells exit from the cell cycle within 24 hr and start acquiring secondary and tertiary branches. As progenitors mature, they lose A2B5 but retain O4 immunoreactivity. After 48–72 hr of mitogen withdrawal, differentiating oligodendrocytes begin synthesizing GalC, and, by 96–120 hr, they also express the myelin component PLP (Fig.1A).
To detect changes in histone acetylation during oligodendrocyte lineage progression, protein extracts were harvested from proliferating progenitors cultured in bFGF after 6, 24, and 48 hr of mitogen withdrawal and analyzed by Western blot analysis using an antibody directed against acetyl-lysine residues. Interestingly, two heavily acetylated bands ranging between 10 and 17 kDa were present in proliferating progenitors (Fig. 1B). As early as 6 hr after mitogen withdrawal, the intensity of the signal for both bands decreased, indicating loss of the acetyl groups from the lysine residues. The decrease of intensity was observed throughout the duration of the experiment, with the weakest acetylation signal observed in cells cultured for 24 hr after mitogen withdrawal (Fig.1B). Treatment of cells with TSA during this time interval strongly inhibited HDAC activity, as shown by the threefold to fourfold increase of the acetylation signal in TSA-treated samples (Fig. 1B,C).
Although this temporal pattern of deacetylation was observed in four separate experiments, the intensity of the acetylation changes was variable from experiment to experiment. For this reason, a densitometric analysis of the chemiluminescent signal was performed, and the average values from the separate determinations are shown in Figure 1C. Each acetylated band was scanned, and the densitometric value was normalized to the actin content. The level of acetylation in the bFGF sample was arbitrarily defined as 100%. The acetylation signal of the samples harvested at different time points after mitogen removal was then represented as a percentage of the value in the presence of bFGF (Fig. 1C). Interestingly, at 6 hr, the average acetylation of H3 was 53%, and the average of H4 was 44% of the values determined in progenitor cells. At 24 hr, the average intensity of the acetylation signal decreased even further, reaching 28% of the original values for H3 and 13% for H4. Finally, at 48 hr, the average acetylation signal for H3 was 36% and for H4 was 30% of the initial levels.
To exclude the possibility that the decreased histone acetylation signal observed during oligodendrocyte lineage progression was attributable to decreased histone levels, cell lysates were harvested at distinct time points and analyzed for protein content by Western blot analysis using antibodies against total histones. As shown in Figure 2, the steady-state protein levels of histones H3, H2A, H2B (Fig. 2A), and histone H4 (Fig. 2B) did not change significantly during the time period examined in this study. We therefore concluded that the decreased histone acetylation signal was not attributable to significant changes in protein levels.
To determine whether the changes in the acetylation during oligodendrocyte differentiation were attributable exclusively to deacetylation of lysine residues in nucleosomal histones (i.e., H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) or also affecting other chromatin proteins of the high-mobility group (i.e., HMGNs), we performed immunoprecipitation followed by Western blot analysis. Protein lysates obtained from differentiating oligodendrocyte progenitors were immunoprecipitated with antibodies against acetyl lysine, and the acetylated bands were then identified by Western blot analysis using antibodies recognizing histones H3 and H4 (Fig. 2C), histones H2A and H2B (Fig.2D), or the high-mobility group proteins HMGN-1 and HMGN-2 (Fig. 2D). Interestingly, not all of the chromatin proteins were affected by HDAC activity during the onset of oligodendrocyte differentiation. Histone H2B and the high-mobility group protein HMGN-2, for instance, although both were detected in cell lysates of oligodendrocyte progenitors, did not show any change in acetylation during oligodendrocyte differentiation (Fig.2D).
Densitometric analysis of the acetylation signal of H3 at 24 hr revealed a decrease to 23% of the values observed in progenitors. A similar decrease in acetylation during the first 24 hr of differentiation was also observed for HMGN-1, in which levels were reduced to 27% of the initial values. In contrast, the changes of H2A were of much smaller entity because, at 24 hr, the acetylation signal was still 70% of the progenitor values. From these data, we conclude that HDAC activity in differentiating oligodendrocytes is primarily directed to lysine residues in the tail of nucleosomal histones H4 and H3 and of the high-mobility group protein HMGN-1.
Inhibition of histone deacetylation with TSA prevents branching associated with oligodendrocyte progenitor lineage progression
To establish the functional significance of histone deacetylation during oligodendrocyte development, differentiation of progenitors was evaluated in the presence of increasing doses of the pharmacological inhibitor of HDAC TSA. Untreated progenitors differentiate very fast in response to mitogen withdrawal, and, within 24 hr, cells are characterized by the outgrowth of several fine cellular processes and a complex morphology (Fig. 1A). Treatment of differentiating progenitors with increasing concentrations of TSA progressively inhibited the formation of cellular branches (Fig.3A). A quantitative analysis of the effect of the inhibitor on process outgrowth revealed a gradual shift of the prevalent phenotype with increasing doses of TSA. We observed a change from the complex morphology of untreated progenitors, to the intermediate phenotype of cells treated with 1 ng/ml TSA, to the simple morphology of cells treated with 10 ng/ml TSA (Fig. 3C). The progressive effect of increasing concentrations of TSA on morphological differentiation (Fig.3A,C) correlated with a detectable increase in the acetylation signal (Fig. 3B).
The effect of TSA on morphological differentiation of progenitors was observed also with other inhibitors of histone deacetylase, such as sodium butyrate. Lower concentrations of the drug (0.5 mm) did not affect process outgrowth (Fig. 3D). However, at a concentration known to inhibit HDAC activity (5 mm), sodium butyrate induced morphological changes similar to the ones induced by TSA. Also in this case, the outgrowth of the characteristic fine and complex branches was replaced by the formation of few bulky and thick cytoplasmic processes (Fig.3D).
To begin to characterize the effect of the HDAC inhibitor on oligodendrocyte branching, we asked what was the minimum duration of the treatment resulting in stable alterations of process outgrowth. For this purpose, cells were induced to differentiate in mitogen-free medium containing 10 ng/ml TSA for the first 6, 12, or 24 hr of culture and then kept in medium without TSA for an additional 24 hr. As shown in Figure 4, the effect of TSA on the morphology of the cells was most evident after 24 hr of treatment. By this time, >90% of the cells exhibited a simple morphology. Together, these results suggest that HDAC activity is required for the induction of the morphological changes characteristic of differentiated oligodendrocytes.
TSA treatment is effective in preventing differentiation only if initiated during a specific temporal window
The time course of histone deacetylation, immediately preceding the onset of oligodendrocyte differentiation, suggested the possible existence of a temporal window of responsiveness of progenitors to differentiative stimuli (Fig.5A). This hypothesis predicts that inhibition of histone deacetylation will prevent differentiation only during a specific time frame. To test this hypothesis, we started a 24 hr treatment with TSA at several time points after mitogen withdrawal. Cells were allowed to differentiate in mitogen-free medium for 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hr in the absence of TSA and were then kept for 24 hr in medium containing 10 ng/ml TSA. At the end of the treatment, cells were fixed, stained with O4, and assessed for morphological differentiation. As predicted by our hypothesis, the effect of TSA in preventing the acquisition of the complex branched morphology was observed only if treatment was started during the first 48 hr of mitogen withdrawal (Fig.5A,B). However, the earlier start of the treatment correlated with a more prominent effect of TSA on branching. If treatment was initiated at the time of mitogen withdrawal, the cells displayed a very simple morphology after 1 d (Fig. 5A, d). The simple morphology was retained by the cells even after 4 d of treatment (Fig. 5C). Similar results were obtained when the treatment was started 6 hr after the removal of mitogens (Fig. 5B). However, when TSA was added to the medium after the cells had began to emit long primary branches (i.e., after 12 or 24 hr of culture in mitogen-free medium), the cells did not revert to a simpler morphology and did not elaborate additional processes. Therefore, they were characterized as “intermediate phenotype” (Fig. 5B). Finally, the start of treatment after differentiation had occurred (i.e., after 72 or 96 hr of culture in mitogen-free medium) did not revert the cells to a simpler phenotype. In this case, TSA-treated cells displayed the typical branching and membrane sheets (Fig. 5A,f) characteristic of mature oligodendrocyte (Fig.5A, e). From these results, we conclude that TSA is not effective after the differentiation program has been initiated but prevents the progression to a mature phenotype if deacetylation is inhibited during the first 24–48 hr after mitogen withdrawal.
Inhibition of histone deacetylation with TSA prevents the synthesis of oligodendrocyte differentiation markers
The effect of TSA treatment on morphological branching suggested that inhibiting histone deacetylation prevented the acquisition of a differentiated phenotype, although it did not address whether the expression of specific differentiation genes was also inhibited. To test the role of HDAC activity in oligodendrocyte differentiation, we therefore characterized the expression profile of stage-specific markers in the absence and presence of TSA. Untreated oligodendrocyte progenitors cultured in bFGF are characterized by the presence of the surface antigen A2B5 and the lipid sulfatide O4 (Bansal et al., 1989). When these cells are induced to differentiate by mitogen withdrawal, they lose A2B5 immunoreactivity and begin to express myelin components. GalC, the major lipid in myelin, is typically expressed between 48 and 72 hr, whereas PLP is expressed after 96–120 hr. TSA-treated cells, in contrast, did not lose A2B5 immunoreactivity and did not express the myelin components GalC and PLP, even 120 hr after mitogen withdrawal (Fig. 6A). Loss of PLP immunoreactivity occurred in the vast majority of the TSA-treated cells (Fig. 7). To determine whether decreased PLP immunoreactivity was attributable to decreased RNA levels, we used an RT-PCR. Consistent with an effect of TSA in modulating gene expression by affecting histone acetylation, decreased levels of PLP and GalC in the TSA-treated cells correlated with decreased RNA levels (Fig. 6B) for PLP and CGT (i.e., the synthetic enzyme responsible for the production of GalC). These data suggest that presumptive chromatin changes attributable to histone deacetylation are necessary for the expression of oligodendrocyte differentiation markers.
The effect of histone deacetylation inhibition on oligodendrocyte differentiation is independent of cell cycle exit
The inhibitory effect of TSA on oligodendrocyte lineage progression could have been attributable to a direct effect of histone deacetylation on the differentiation program itself or to an indirect effect on proliferation. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we labeled cells in S phase with the thymidine analog BrdU and then counted the number of BrdU-positive cells in TSA-treated and untreated cultures. Briefly, progenitors were cultured in the presence of bFGF or in the absence of mitogen for 6, 12, 24, and 48 hr. All cultures were labeled with 10 μm BrdU during the last 6 hr before the end of the experiment. Cells were then fixed and double stained with antibodies against BrdU and against specific progenitor markers (i.e., A2B5 and O4). The number of A2B5+/BrdU+cells and O4+/BrdU+cells (Fig. 8A) was counted, and the percentage of BrdU-incorporating cells was calculated by dividing the number of double-labeled cells by the total number of A2B5+ and O4+cells (Fig. 8B). The percentage of cells in S phase was similar in TSA-treated and untreated progenitors cultured in bFGF (Fig.8A,B). A similar percentage of proliferating cells was also observed in TSA-treated and untreated cells after 6 and 12 hr of mitogen withdrawal. Interestingly, TSA-treated cells showed a faster kinetic of withdrawal from the cell cycle, because 100% of the treated cells exited the cell cycle at 24 hr, whereas 30% of the untreated cells was still proliferating (Fig.8B). This effect was likely attributable to increased levels of the cell cycle inhibitor p21waf-1 (Fig. 8C) in TSA-treated cells, which is consistent with reports in other cell types (Yoshida et al., 1995; Sowa et al., 1999; Xiao et al., 1999). From these results, we conclude that the inability of oligodendrocyte progenitors to differentiate in the presence of HDAC inhibitors was not attributable to increased proliferation.
Removal of histone deacetylase inhibition allows recovery of morphological branching but not the synthesis of late differentiation markers
The acetylation state of nucleosomal histones is a reversible event because acetyl groups are transferred to lysine residues by the activity of acetyltransferases and removed by the activity of histone deacetylases. TSA inhibits the removal of acetyl groups from the histone tails, and, presumably, the activity of HDAC is restored immediately after removal of the drug, unless histone modifications have induced more permanent changes in chromatin conformation. To test the reversibility of TSA effect, progenitors were treated during the first 24 hr of mitogen withdrawal and then the drug was washed away, and the cells were kept in mitogen-free medium for a total of 3 or 5 d. After this recovery time, cells were fixed, stained, and then analyzed for branched morphology and myelin gene expression (Fig.9). Three days after mitogen withdrawal, untreated cells were highly branched and expressed both lipid sulfatides (identified by O4 immunoreactivity) and galactocerebrosides (identified by GalC immunoreactivity). At the same time point, cells that were treated with TSA during the first 24 hr showed shorter cellular processes and barely detectable levels of GalC. Five days after mitogen withdrawal, untreated cells expressed high levels of PLP and had developed extensive myelin sheets (Fig. 9A). At the same time point, however, cells that were treated with TSA for the first 24 hr did not elaborate complex membranes and expressed very low levels of PLP (Fig. 9A). Interestingly, a Western bot analysis of cell extracts obtained from cells at distinct recovery times reveals fast deacetylation kinetics after the removal of the drug (Fig. 9B). These data suggested that the effects of preventing histone deacetylation during the first 24 hr of mitogen withdrawal are only partially reversible.
TSA blocks the progression of progenitors into oligodendrocytes but not into astrocytes
Cortical oligodendrocyte progenitors have the ability to differentiate in vitro into oligodendrocytes, when cultured in the absence of mitogens, or into type II astrocytes, when cultured in the presence of serum. The results described above show that histone deacetylation was necessary for oligodendrocyte differentiation. We now asked whether histone deacetylation was crucial also for the progression into type II astrocytes. Progenitors were cultured in serum containing medium with or without TSA for 7–10 d and then stained for GFAP (Fig. 10). In the presence of bFGF or after the removal of mitogens, progenitors do not express GFAP (data not shown). However, after 7–10 d of culture in medium containing 20% serum, cells can be identified as “protoplasmic” astrocyte or type II astrocytes, characterized by a stellate morphology with thick cytoplasmic processes and GFAP expression. Interestingly, the presence of TSA in the medium did not affect the morphology or the expression of astrocyte markers and were virtually indistinguishable from untreated controls (Fig. 10). We conclude that histone deacetylation is a specific event occurring during differentiation of bipotential progenitors into the oligodendrocyte but not into the astrocyte lineage.
DISCUSSION
Histone deacetylation is necessary for oligodendrocyte differentiation
The mechanisms responsible for oligodendrocyte differentiation are still primarily not understood. Recent progress has been made in the identification of transcription factors regulating the specification of oligodendrocyte progenitors from multipotential neural stem cells, but the steps involved in the subsequent progression to a myelinating cell are still primarily not understood. Several lines of evidence have established the existence of an obligate relationship between cell cycle exit and differentiation. Although differences might exist between progenitors isolated from the optic nerve or from the cerebellar or cortical cortex (Ghiani and Gallo, 2001), it can be stated that the presence of mitogens favors cell division at the expenses of differentiation, whereas the absence of mitogens favors withdrawal from the cell cycle and oligodendrocyte differentiation (Noble and Murray, 1984; Temple and Raff, 1985). In addition, clonal analysis of single optic rat nerve progenitors indicated that, in the presence of specific extracellular signals, cells divide a certain number of times before they stop and differentiate (Temple and Raff, 1986; Barres et al., 1994). Finally, phenotypic analysis of mice with targeted deletions for genes encoding the cell cycle inhibitors p21-Waf1 or p27-Kip1 indicated that differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors was clearly impaired (Casaccia-Bonnefil et al., 1997, 1999;Zezula et al., 2001). These results led to the hypothesis that cell cycle inhibitors may be sufficient to induce differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors. However, when p27-Kip1 levels were increased in proliferating oligodendrocyte progenitors by treatment with neurotransmitters (Ghiani et al., 1999) or by viral gene transfer (Tikoo et al., 1998; Tang et al., 1999), the cells stopped proliferating but did not differentiate. Together, these data indicated that, besides cell cycle regulators, other elements might be required to start the oligodendrocyte transcriptional program of differentiation.
Studies in other lineages indicated that chromatin modifiers with histone acetyltransferase activity are necessary for the induction of terminal differentiation. The recruitment of coactivators such as p300 in a complex with other transcription factors is able to activate expression of neuronal and astrocytic genes.
Based on these studies, we asked whether histone acetylation could be a molecular mechanism that, together with molecules regulating cell cycle exit, modulates the access of transcription factors to the promoter regions of genes involved in oligodendrocyte differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we induced cell cycle exit by removing the mitogens from the culture medium. There are several advantages in using mitogen withdrawal as an experimental paradigm of oligodendrocyte differentiation. First, it allows the study of events “intrinsic” to the cell, in the absence of additional signals from the extracellular environment. Second, differentiation of progenitors proceeds in a sequence of temporally well defined stages, each characterized by specific morphological features and unique antigenic repertoire (Pfeiffer et al., 1993). Using this model system, we first showed that histone deacetylation, rather than acetylation, occurs in primary cortical oligodendrocyte progenitors during the temporal window preceding the onset of differentiation. We then addressed the necessity of this event for oligodendrocyte differentiation by testing the consequences of histone deacetylase inhibitors on oligodendrocyte lineage progression. Because the acetyl groups on nucleosomal histone tails are in a dynamic equilibrium based on the activity of HATs and deacetylases (e.g., HDACs), blockers of HDAC, such as TSA and sodium butyrate, increase the histone acetylation state (Fig. 3). Our data indicate that TSA prevented the progression of progenitors to mature oligodendrocytes (Figs. 3-7). Although we cannot formally exclude the possibility that TSA may act also on proteins other than nucleosomal histones, our data using antibodies directed against acetylated lysine residues detected changes only in proteins with a molecular weight between 9 and 18 kDa. These bands were further characterized by their immunoreactivity with antibodies against the nucleosomal histones H2A, H3, and H4 and the high-mobility group protein HMGN-1. In addition, several studies in other cell types have indicated the specificity of TSA on the inhibition of HDAC activity at the concentrations used in our studies (Yoshida et al., 1990, 1995). Finally, additional data on the specificity of TSA as inhibitor of HDAC have been provided by the recent crystal structure of the histone deacetylase catalytic core bound to TSA (Finnin et al., 1999). Together, these evidences validate the use of TSA as a specific inhibitor of HDAC enzymatic activity.
Bulk histone deacetylation is transiently observed during oligodendrocyte differentiation
Although histone acetylation–deacetylation has been shown to regulate the activity of specific promoter regions, this is the first study to our knowledge of bulk histone deacetylation associated with differentiation of progenitor cells. Because deacetylation of nucleosomal histones is associated with repressed chromatin structure, the detection of this event during a specific temporal window after mitogen withdrawal and before onset of differentiation raises several questions. Does repression occur during oligodendrocyte lineage progression? If so, what is the extent of transcriptional repression event? The importance of transcriptional repression in oligodendrocyte lineage progression is supported by numerous studies describing progressive loss of specific gene products during normal oligodendrocyte development. There is general consensus regarding downregulation of specific surface antigens (Raff et al., 1984), transcription factors (Wegner, 2001), differentiation inhibitors (Kondo and Raff, 2000), growth factor receptors (Hart et al., 1989; Ellison and de Vellis, 1994; Bansal et al., 1996; Rodriguez-Pena, 1999), guidance molecules, and cell cycle genes (Casaccia-Bonnefil et al., 1997; Huang et al., 2002) during oligodendrocyte differentiation.In vivo, this decrease in gene expression occurs gradually, whereas in vitro, the withdrawal of mitogens accelerates timing of differentiation, therefore “condensing” changes in gene expression within a much shorter timeframe. This “synchronized” repression of multiple genes could explain the “bulk” histone deacetylation observed in our study.
A proposed model of the role of histone deacetylation in oligodendrocyte differentiation
Our observations suggest that histone deacetylation is required for differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors. Because histone deacetylation is associated with chromatin compaction, we propose two models to explain the role possibly played by chromatin remodeling in oligodendrocyte differentiation. According to one model, compaction of chromatin may occur on negative regulatory sites of differentiation genes (Fig. 11A). According to this model, the promoter activity of specific differentiation genes, such as PLP, is maintained low in progenitor cells (Timsit et al., 1995; Dickinson et al., 1996; Mallon et al., 2002) by the interaction of specific repressors binding negative regulatory sites in the promoter region (Berndt et al., 1992;Wight et al., 1997). Histone deacetylation in these regions would result in chromatin compaction and difficult access of repressors to these negative regulatory elements. This change of conformation therefore reduces repression and results in increased levels of expression in the gene product (Fig. 11A). According to an alternative model, chromatin compaction may occur in the promoter region of genes encoding for inhibitors of differentiation site (i.e., Ids) (Kondo and Raff, 2000), thereby blocking the access of the transcriptional apparatus to the START site. In this case, chromatin compaction may be responsible for the decreased levels of molecules known to sequester activators of myelin gene expression, such as the Ids (Fig. 11B). These models are not mutually exclusive and may well both occur within the same cell at a given time.
Concluding remarks
In conclusion, we identified histone deacetylase activity as necessary for oligodendrocyte differentiation. This mechanism involves deacetylation of chromatin components and is followed by presumptive chromatin remodeling. Blocking deacetylation prevents differentiation and suggests that transcriptional repression is a crucial event during oligodendrocyte lineage progression. A better understanding of these molecular events will allow the design of therapies targeted at efficient remyelination.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the Wadsworth Foundation (P.C.B.) and National Multiple Sclerosis Society Grants RG 3154-A-2 (P.C.B.) and FA 1512-A-1 (M.M.H.). We thank Drs. N. Hayes and E. Di Cicco-Bloom for critical reading of this manuscript, Dr. D. Reinberg for advice and reagents, and Dr. M. Bustin for antibodies.
Correspondence should be addressed to Patrizia Casaccia-Bonnefil, Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854. E-mail:casaccpa@umdnj.edu.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ashraf SI, Ip YT. Transcriptional control: repression by local chromatin modification. Curr Biol. 1998;8:R683–R686. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70435-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ballas N, Battaglioli E, Atouf F, Andres ME, Chenoweth J, Anderson ME, Burger C, Moniwa M, Davie JR, Bowers WJ, Federoff HJ, Rose DW, Rosenfeld MG, Brehm P, Mandel G. Regulation of neuronal traits by a novel transcriptional complex. Neuron. 2001;31:353–365. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00371-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bansal R, Pfeiffer SE. FGF-2 converts mature oligodendrocytes to a novel phenotype. J Neurosci Res. 1997;50:215–228. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19971015)50:2<215::AID-JNR10>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bansal R, Warrington AE, Gard AL, Ranscht B, Pfeiffer SE. Multiple and novel specificities of monoclonal antibodies O1, O4, and R-mAb used in the analysis of oligodendrocyte development. J Neurosci Res. 1989;24:548–557. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490240413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bansal R, Kumar M, Murray K, Morrison R, Pfeiffer SE. Regulation of FGF receptors in the oligodendrocyte lineage. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1996;7:263–275. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1996.0020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barres BA, Lazar MA, Raff MC. A novel role for thyroid hormone, glucocorticoids and retinoic acid in timing oligodendrocyte development. Development. 1994;120:1097–1108. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.5.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berndt JA, Kim JG, Hudson LD. Identification of cis-regulatory elements in the myelin proteolipid protein (PLP) gene. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:14730–14737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Carter B, Dobrowsky R, Chao MVC. Death of oligodendrocytes mediated by the interaction of nerve growth factor with its receptor p75. Nature. 1996;383:716–719. doi: 10.1038/383716a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Kiyokawa H, Tikoo R, Friedrich V, Koff A, Chao MVC. Oligodendrocyte precursor differentiation is perturbed in the absence of the cyclin-dependent Kinase inhibitor p27Kip1. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2335–2346. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.18.2335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Hardy RJ, Teng KK, Levine JM, Koff A, Chao MV. Loss of p27kip1 function results in increased proliferative capacity of oligodendrocyte progenitors but unaltered timing of differentiation. Development. 1999;126:4027–4037. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.18.4027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chong JA, Tapia-Ramirez J, Kim S, Toledo-Aral JJ, Zheng Y, Boutros MC, Altshuller YM, Frohman MA, Kraner SD, Mandel G. REST: a mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons. Cell. 1995;80:949–957. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90298-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Csordas A. On the biological role of histone acetylation. Biochem J. 1990;265:23–38. doi: 10.1042/bj2650023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dickinson PJ, Fanarraga ML, Griffiths IR, Barrie JM, Kyriakides E, Montague P. Oligodendrocyte progenitors in the embryonic spinal cord express DM-20. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1996;22:188–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Durand B, Fero ML, Roberts JM, Raff MC. p27kip1 alters the response of cells to mitogen and is part of a cell-intrinsic timer that arrest the cell cycle and initiates differentiation. Curr Biol. 1998;8:431–440. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70177-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ellison JA, de Vellis J. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor is expressed by cells in the early oligodendrocyte lineage. J Neurosci Res. 1994;37:116–128. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490370116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Finnin MS, Donigian JR, Cohen A, Richon VM, Rifkind RA, Marks PA, Breslow R, Pavletich NP. Structures of a histone deacetylase homologue bound to the TSA and SAHA inhibitors. Nature. 1999;401:188–193. doi: 10.1038/43710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gard AL, Pfeiffer SE. Glial cell mitogens bFGF and PDGF differentially regulate development of O4+GalC− oligodendrocyte progenitors. Dev Biol. 1993;159:618–630. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ghiani C, Gallo V. Inhibition of cyclin E–cyclin-dependent kinase 2 complex formation and activity is associated with cell cycle arrest and withdrawal in oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. J Neurosci. 2001;21:1274–1282. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-04-01274.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ghiani CA, Eisen AM, Yuan X, DePinho RA, McBain CJ, Gallo V. Neurotransmitter receptor activation triggers p27(Kip1) and p21(CIP1) accumulation and G1 cell cycle arrest in oligodendrocyte progenitors. Development. 1999;126:1077–1090. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.5.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Griffith EC, Cowan CW, Greenberg ME. REST acts through multiple deacetylase complexes. Neuron. 2001;31:339–340. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00386-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hart IK, Richardson WD, Heldin CH, Westermark B, Raff MC. PDGF receptors on cells of the oligodendrocyte-type-2 astrocyte (O2-A) lineage. Development. 1989;105:595–603. doi: 10.1242/dev.105.3.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huang Z, Tang XM, Cambi F. Down-regulation of the retinoblastoma protein (rb) is associated with rat oligodendrocyte differentiation. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;19:250–262. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2001.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jeong S, Stein A. Micrococcal nuclease digestion of nuclei reveals extended nucleosome ladders having anomalous DNA lengths for chromatin assembled on non-replicating plasmids in transfected cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:370–375. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.3.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kondo T, Raff M. The Id4 HLH protein and the timing of oligodendrocyte differentiation. EMBO J. 2000;19:1998–2007. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.9.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mallon BS, Shick HE, Kidd GJ, Macklin WB. Proteolipid promoter activity distinguishes two populations of NG2-positive cells throughout neonatal cortical development. J Neurosci. 2002;22:876–885. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00876.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McCarthy KD, de Vellis J. Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglial cell cultures from rat cerebral tissue. J Cell Biol. 1980;85:890–902. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nakashima K, Wiese S, Yanagisawa M, Arakawa H, Kimura N, Hisatsune T, Yoshida K, Kishimoto T, Sendtner M, Taga T. Developmental requirement of gp130 signaling in neuronal survival and astrocyte differentiation. J Neurosci. 1999;19:5429–5434. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05429.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Noble M, Murray K. Purified astrocytes promote the in vitro division of a bipotential glial progenitor cell. EMBO J. 1984;3:2243–2247. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02122.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pfeiffer SE, Warrington AE, Bansal R. The oligodendrocyte and its many cellular processes. Trends Cell Biol. 1993;3:191–197. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90213-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raff MC, Williams BP, Miller RH. The in vitro differentiation of a bipotential glial progenitor cell. EMBO J. 1984;5:1857–1864. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02059.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rodriguez-Pena A. Oligodendrocyte development and thyroid hormone. J Neurobiol. 1999;40:497–512. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(19990915)40:4<497::aid-neu7>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roth SY, Allis CD. Histone acetylation and chromatin assembly: a single escort, multiple dances? Cell. 1996;87:5–8. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81316-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schoenherr CJ, Anderson DJ. Silencing is golden: negative regulation in the control of neuronal gene transcription. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5:566–571. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80060-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sowa Y, Orita T, Hiranabe-Minamikawa S, Nakano K, Mizuno T, Nomura H, Sakai T. Histone deacetylase inhibitor activates the p21/WAF1/Cip1 gene promoter through the Sp1 sites. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999;886:195–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Struhl K. Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Genes Dev. 1998;12:599–606. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.5.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sun Y, Nadal-Vicens M, Misono S, Lin MZ, Zubiaga A, Hua X, Fan G, Greenberg ME. Neurogenin promotes neurogenesis and inhibits glial differentiation by independent mechanisms. Cell. 2001;104:365–376. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Svaren J, Horz W. Regulation of gene expression by nucleosomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996;6:164–170. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(96)80046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tang X-M, Beesley JS, Grinspan JB, Seth P, Kamholz J, Cambi F. Cell cycle arrest induced by ectopic expression of p27 is not sufficient to promote oligodendrocyte differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 1999;76:270–279. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(20000201)76:2<270::aid-jcb10>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Temple S, Raff MC. Differentiation of a bipotential glial progenitor cell in a single cell microculture. Nature. 1985;313:223–225. doi: 10.1038/313223a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Temple S, Raff MC. Clonal analysis of oligodendrocyte development in culture: evidence for a developmental clock that counts cell divisions. Cell. 1986;44:773–779. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90843-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tikoo R, Osterhout DJ, Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Preth S, Koff A, Chao MVC. Ectopic expression of p27 in oligodendrocyte progenitors induces growth arrest. J Neurobiol. 1998;36:431–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Timsit S, Martinez S, Allinquant B, Peyron F, Puelles L, Zalc B. Oligodendrocytes originate in a restricted zone of the embryonic ventral neural tube defined by DM-20 mRNA expression. J Neurosci. 1995;15:1012–1024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-02-01012.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wegner M. Expression of transcription factors during oligodendroglial development. Microsc Res Tech. 2001;52:746–752. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wight PA, Dobretsova A, Macklin WB. Regulation of murine myelin proteolipid protein gene expression. J Neurosci Res. 1997;50:917–927. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19971215)50:6<917::AID-JNR2>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Xiao H, Hasegawa T, Isobe K. Both Sp1 and Sp3 are responsible for p21waf1 promoter activity induced by histone deacetylase inhibitor in NIH3T3 cells. J Cell Biochem. 1999;73:291–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yoshida M, Kijima M, Akita M, Beppu T. Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:17174–17179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yoshida M, Horinouchi S, Beppu T. Trichostatin A and trapoxin: novel chemical probes for the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function. BioEssays. 1995;17:423–430. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zezula J, Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Ezhevsky SA, Osterhout DJ, Lenive JM, Dowdy SF, Chao MV, Koff A. p21cip1 is required for the differentiation of oligodendrocytes independently of cell cycle withdrawal. EMBO J. 2001;2:27–34. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang HS, Gavin M, Dahiya A, Postigo AA, Ma D, Luo RX, Harbour JW, Dean DC. Exit from G1 and S phase of the cell cycle is regulated by repressor complexes containing HDAC-Rb-hSWI/SNF and Rb-hSWI/SNF. Cell. 2000;101:79–89. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80625-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]