Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 24.
Published in final edited form as: Biomacromolecules. 2018 Mar 26;19(4):1189–1197. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00063

Nitric oxide-releasing alginates

Mona Jasmine R Ahonen 1, Dakota J Suchyta 1, Huanyu Zhu 1, Mark H Schoenfisch 1,*
PMCID: PMC6759059  NIHMSID: NIHMS1051392  PMID: 29551064

Abstract

Low and high molecular weight alginate biopolymers were chemically modified to store and release potentially therapeutic levels of nitric oxide (NO). Carbodiimide chemistry was first used to modify carboxylic acid functional groups with a series of small molecule alkyl amines. The resulting secondary amines were subsequently converted to N-diazeniumdiolate NO donors via reaction with NO gas under basic conditions. NO donor-modified alginates stored between 0.4–0.6 µmol NO·mg−1. In aqueous solution, the NO-release kinetics were diverse (0.3–13 h half-lives), dependent on the precursor amine structure. The liberated NO showed bactericidal activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus with pathogen eradication efficiency dependent on both molecular weight and NO-release kinetics. The combination of lower molecular weight (~5 kDa) alginates with moderate NO-release durations (half-life of ~4 h) resulted in enhanced killing of both planktonic and biofilm-based bacteria. Toxicity against human respiratory epithelial (A549) cells proved negligible at NO-releasing alginate concentrations required to achieve a 5-log reduction in viability in the biofilm eradication assay.

Keywords: nitric oxide, alginate, antibacterial, biofilm eradication

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1051392-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Bacterial infections pose a great challenge to human health in community and hospital settings.13 Chronic infections associated with implanted devices,4 wounds,2,5 and cystic fibrosis4,6 are frequently caused by biofilm-forming pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.4,7 Bacteria in biofilms are particularly challenging to address as they form an exopolysaccharide (EPS) matrix as a protective mechanism from the host immune response and antibiotic interventions. Indeed, eradication of bacteria in biofilms may require up to 1000 times greater antibiotic concentrations relative to those needed to kill planktonic bacteria.8 Several factors contribute to such protection, including slower bacterial metabolism, limited diffusion of the antibacterial agent (e.g., antibiotic) through the EPS matrix, and altered microenvironments (e.g., regions of nutrient or oxygen depletion).4,7,9 Furthermore, bacteria have developed potential cellular mechanisms (e.g., self-alteration of cell membrane targets and the use of pumps to reduce internal concentration of antibiotics) that minimize the effects of antibiotics. New antibacterial agents that can more effectively penetrate and effectively act on biofilm-based bacterial colonies are greatly needed in the fight against emerging antibiotic-resistant pathogens.10

Nitric oxide (NO) is an endogenous free radical that plays an integral role in the innate immune response to foreign pathogens. Much of NO’s broad-spectrum antibacterial activity is accounted for by its reactive byproducts, including peroxynitrite and dinitrogen trioxide, which exert oxidative and nitrosative damage to microbial DNA and membrane structures.1115 As a result of NO’s small size and the mechanisms by which it exerts antibacterial action, bacteria are unlikely to foster resistance to NO.16 The hazards of pressurized cylinders, NO’s high reactivity in biological media, and even toxicity concerns have led researchers to develop and study the utility of NO donors – both small molecule and macromolecular systems – as a means for storing and releasing NO under specific environmental conditions.12,14,17 N-diazeniumdiolate NO donors have garnered much attention due to the spontaneous liberation of NO in aqueous solution at physiological pH.14 While NO’s role in immune cell response to pathogens is clear, developing therapies based on the delivery of NO gas is challenging. Unfortunately, NO payloads for small molecule NO donors can be limited with precursor toxicity risks when larger concentrations are required.17 To address such concerns, we have focused on the development of macromolecular N-diazeniumdiolate NO-release systems with inherently superior NO payloads, control over NO release kinetics, and unique release mechanisms.1824

Biopolymers such as chitosan, cellulose, and alginate represent attractive potential NO donor scaffolds due to their inherent biodegradability and favorable toxicity profiles.25,26 Alginate, a naturally occurring anionic polymer consisting of 1,4-linked α-L-guluronic acid (G) and β-D-mannuronic acid (M) units,25,2730 is water soluble even at high molecular weights (>200 kDa), a critical property for in situ release.27,28 As a results of these properties, investigators have studied alginate’s utility for a number of biomedical applications including wound dressings,3032 drug delivery,5,30,33 potentiators for antimicrobial agents,28 and mucin modifiers for cystic fibrosis.29,30,34,35 The alginate backbone offers straightforward chemical modification at hydroxyl and carboxylic acid functional groups, imparting unique versatility with respect to drug storage and release, and control over solubility, biocompatibility, and degradation rates.27,36,37

Herein, we describe the functionalization of both high and low molecular weight alginates with small molecule alkyl amines for subsequent modification with N-diazeniumdiolate NO donors to produce anionic NO-releasing biopolymers. The alkyl amine precursors were selected based on prior literature describing diverse NO-release kinetics related to breakdown of the N-diazeniumdiolate.38,39 The bactericidal action of the alginates was examined with respect to NO-release kinetics, total NO storage, amine precursor structure, and molecular weight.

Experimental Section

Materials.

Alginic acid sodium salt from brown algae (low viscosity), bis(3-aminopropyl) amine (DPTA), diethylenetriamine (DETA), N-propyl-1,3-propanediamine (PAPA), spermine (SPER), phenazine methosulfate (PMS), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), trypsin, penicillin streptomycin (PS), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium inner salt (MTS), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 cell culture medium and common laboratory salts and solvents were purchased from Fischer Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ). Unless otherwise specified, all chemicals were used as received without further purification. Tryptic soy broth (TSB) and tryptic soy agar (TSA) were obtained from Becton, Dickinson, and Company (Franklin Lakes, NJ). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa; ATCC #19143), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus; ATCC #29213), and A549 human lung epithelial cells (ATCC CCL-185) were obtained from American Type Tissue Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Argon (Ar), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N2), nitric oxide (NO) calibration (25.87 ppm, balance N2) gas cylinders were purchased from Airgas National Welders (Raleigh, NC). Pure NO gas (99.5%) was obtained from Praxair (Sanford, NC). Distilled water was purified to a resistivity of 18.2 Mꭥ.cm and a total organic content of ≤6 ppb using a Millipore Milli-Q UV Gradient A10 System (Bedford, MA).

Instrumentation.

1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker (600 MHz) spectrometer. Elemental (carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen; CHN) analysis was performed using a PerkinElmer Elemental Analyzer Series 2400 Instrument (Waltham, MA). Zeta potential measurements were collected in phosphate buffer (10 mM PB; pH 7.4) using a Zetasizer Nano (Malvern Instruments, UK). All absorbance measurements were made in 50 mM sodium hydroxide (NaOH) using a UV-vis Lambda 40 Spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Gel permeation chromatography measurements were carried out in 0.1 M sodium nitrate using an aqueous GPC-multi-angle light scattering system equipped with a Waters 2414 refractive index detector (Milford, MA) coupled to a Wyatt miniDawn TREOS multi-angle light scattering detector (Santa Barbara, CA).

Oxidative degradation of alginate.

Alginate was degraded to lower molecular weight alginate oligosaccharides via oxidative degradation following previously published protocols.40,41 Briefly, alginate (2.5 g) was dissolved in 15 wt% hydrogen peroxide (50 mL) and stirred at 85 °C for 1 h. The solution was filtered to remove any insoluble material. The resulting alginate oligosaccharides were precipitated from the filtered solution in ethanol, collected via centrifugation, washed copiously with ethanol, and dried in vacuo to yield a white powder. GPC measurements revealed the molecular weight of the starting alginate material, as received, was 283 kDa with a dispersity (Ð) of 1.11. The average molecular weight of the alginate oligosaccharides (Alg5) was 4.68 kDa with a dispersity of 1.20.

Synthesis of polyamine-modified alginates (AlgMW-alkyl amine).

Alginate starting materials were modified with either diethylenetriamine (DETA), bis(3-aminopropyl)amine (DPTA), N-propyl-1,3-propanediamine (PAPA), or spermine (SPER) through covalent amide bond formation between the carboxylic acid moieties of alginate and the primary amines of the alkyl amine (Scheme 1).27 Briefly, alginate (100 mg) was dissolved in 10 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 10 mM, pH 6.5) together with a 2:1 molar ratio to 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and a 2:1 molar ratio of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) with respect to the carboxylic moeities of the alginate scaffold. The resulting solution was allowed to mix at room temperature for 30 min before adding a 4:1 molar ratio of the alkyl amine with respect to the carboxylic acid groups of the alginate scaffold to the reaction solution. After 24 h at room temperature, the amine-modified alginates were precipitated in methanol, collected via centrifugation, washed twice with methanol, and dried in vacuo to yield a white solid for each modification.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of amine-functionalized alginate.

Representative 1H NMR of alginate and the polyamine-modified alginates included the following peaks:

Alg300 and Alg5: 1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 3.60–4.05 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.30 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH), 4.50–4.60 (NHCOCH), 4.90 (OCH(CHOH)O).

Alg300-DETA and Alg5-DETA: 1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 2.30–3.30 (CH2CH2NHCH2CH2NH2), 3.60–4.05 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.30 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH), 4.50–4.60 (NHCOCH), 4.90 (OCH(CHOH)O).

Alg300-DPTA and Alg5-DPTA: 1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 1.60–1.80 (CH2CH2CH2NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 2.60–2.30 (CH2CH2CH2NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 2.80–3.10 (CH2CH2CH2NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 3.60–4.05 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.30 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH), 4.50–4.60 (NHCOCH), 4.90 (OCH(CHOH)O).

Alg300-PAPA and Alg5-PAPA: 1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 0.70–0.80 (NHCH2CH2CH3), 1.52 (NHCH2CH2CH3), 1.85 (CH2CH2CH2NHCH2CH2CH3), 2.80–3.10 (CH2CH2CH2NHCH2CH2CH3), 3.60–4.05 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.30 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH), 4.50–4.60 (NHCOCH), 4.90 (OCH(CHOH)O).

Alg300-SPER and Alg5-SPER: 1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 1.13 (NHCH2(CH2)2CH2NH), 1.56 (NHCH2CH2CH2NH), 1.80 (C(O)NHCH2CH2CH2NH), 2.20–2.40 (CH2CH2CH2NH, NHCH2(CH2)2CH2NH, NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 2.68 (NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 2.80–3.10 (C(O)NHCH2CH2CH2NH, NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 3.60–4.05 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.30 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH), 4.50–4.60 (NHCOCH), 4.90 (OCH(CHOH)O).

Representative 13C NMR of alginate and the polyamine-modified alginate included the following peaks:

Alg300 and Alg5: 13C NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 65.0–80.0 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)CH(OH)CH(O)), 100.0 (OCHCH(OH)), 175.0 (CHC(O)).

Alg300-DETA and Alg5-DETA: 13C NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 39.0–47.0 (C(O)NHCH2CH2NHCH2CH2NH2), 65.0–80.0 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)CH(OH)CH(O)), 100.0 (OCHCH(OH)), 160.0 (CHC(O)NH), 175.0 (CHC(O)).

Alg300-DPTA and Alg5-DPTA: 13C NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 26.9–29.5 (C(O)NHCH2CH2CH2NH, NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 37.6–46.0 (C(O)NHCH2CH2CH2NH, NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 65.0–80.0 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)CH(OH)CH(O)), 100.0 (OCHCH(OH)), 160.0 (CHC(O)NH), 175.0 (CHC(O)).

Alg300-PAPA and Alg5-PAPA: 13C NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 10.9 (NHCH2CH2CH3), 20.0 (NHCH2CH2CH3), 31.3–49.0 (C(O)NHCH2CH2CH2NH, NHCH2CH2CH3), 65.0–80.0 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)CH(OH)CH(O)), 100.0 (OCHCH(OH)), 160.0 (CHC(O)NH), 175.0 (CHC(O)).

Alg300-SPER and Alg5-SPER: 13C NMR (600 MHz, D2O, δ) 23.2 (NHCH2(CH2)2CH2NH), 34.8–45.0 (C(O)NHCH2CH2CH2NH), 65.0–80.0 (OCHCH(OH)CH(OH)CH(OH)CH(O)), 100.0 (OCHCH(OH)), 160.0 (CHC(O)NH), 175.0 (CHC(O)).

Synthesis of NO-releasing alginates.

To form N-diazeniumdiolate NO donors on the alginate scaffolds, polyamine-modified alginate (45 mg) was dissolved in 50 mM NaOH (3 mL) in a 1-dram glass vial. The open vials were placed in a stainless steel reactor and stirred continuously using a magnetic stir bar. Oxygen was removed from the vessel by purging with argon (10 s, 7 bar) three times, followed by three additional long purges with argon (10 mins, 7 bar). The vessel was then pressurized to 10 bar with NO gas and allowed to react for 3 d. The same argon purging protocol was then repeated to remove unreacted NO. The NO-releasing alginates were then precipitated in methanol, collected by centrifugation, dried overnight in vacuo, and stored in vacuum sealed bags at −20 °C as a dry powder.

Characterization of NO storage and release.

Nitric oxide release was evaluated in real-time using a Sievers 280i Chemiluminescence NO analyzer (NOA; Boulder, CO). Each sample was analyzed before use (e.g., in a biological study) to ensure accurate NO levels. Of note, the NO levels did not change appreciably for alginates stored in moisture-free environments. Prior to analysis, the NOA was calibrated with air passed through a NO zero filter (0 ppm NO) and 25.87 ppm of NO standard gas (balance N2). In a typical measurement, NO-releasing alginates (1 mg) were dissolved in 30 mL of PBS (10 mM, pH 7.4, 37 °C). The solution was purged with nitrogen gas at a flow rate of 70 mL/min to carry liberated NO from the solution to the analyzer. Additional nitrogen flow was supplied to the flask to match the collection rate of the instrument (200 mL/min). Nitric oxide analysis was terminated when NO levels fell below 10 ppb of NO/mg of alginate (the limit of detection of the instrument).

Planktonic bactericidal assays.

P. aeruginosa and S. aureus bacterial cultures were grown from a frozen (−80 °C) stock overnight in TSB at 37 °C. A 500 µL aliquot of culture was grown in 50 mL of fresh TSB to a concentration of 108 colony forming units per mL (CFU/mL). A working bacterial stock was generated by plating the bacterial suspension on TSA and incubating at 37 °C overnight. The TSA bacterial stocks were prepared weekly and stored at 4 °C. For bactericidal assays, colonies of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were taken from the TSA plate, inoculated in 3 mL TSB overnight at 37 °C, and recultured in fresh TSB (50 mL) to a concentration of 108 CFU/mL. These cultures were centrifuged, resuspended in PBS, and diluted to 106 CFU/mL. Weighed samples of NO-releasing alginates and controls (non-NO-releasing alginates) were added to a 1-dram vial. Corresponding volumes of the 106 CFU/mL bacteria were then added to obtain a range of alginate concentrations (0.5 to 16 mg/mL). These solutions were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. Blanks or untreated bacterial solutions were included in each experiment to ensure bacteria viability over the duration of the experiment. Following treatment, the bacterial solutions were diluted serially (10- and 100-fold dilutions), spiral plated on TSA using an Eddy Jet spiral plater (IUL; Farmingdale, NY), and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Bacterial viability was determined using a Flash & Go colony counter (IUL; Farmingdale, NY). The minimum bactericidal concentration after a 4-hour exposure period (MBC4h) was defined as the minimum concentration required to achieve a 3-log reduction in bacterial viability relative to untreated cells (i.e., reduced bacterial counts from 106 to 103 CFU/mL). The limit of detection for this counting method is 2.5 × 103 CFU/mL.42 The corresponding NO dose was calculated by multiplying the MBC4h of the alginate samples (mg/mL) with the measured NO released in PBS (pH 7.4; µmol NO/mg alginate) over the 4 h experimental window.

Biofilm eradication assays.

Similar to planktonic experiments, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus bacterial cultures were grown overnight in TSB at 37 °C and recultured in fresh TSB to a concentration of 108 CFU/mL. These solutions were diluted to 106 CFU/mL in sterile media (P. aeruginosa, TSB; S. aureus, TSB + 0.1% glucose) and grown for 48 h at 37 °C with gentle shaking. The formed biofilms were separated from the growth media by pipetting the biofilm mass. Biofilms (250 µL) were combined with 750 µL of PBS and added to 1-dram vials containing premeasured samples of NO-releasing and control alginates, with final alginate concentrations ranging from 4 to 64 mg/mL. The samples were incubated with gentle shaking for 24 h at 37 °C. Blanks were included in each experiment to ensure bacterial viability over the duration of the experiment. The dispersed biofilms were vortexed, serially diluted (10-, 100-, 1000-, and 10,000-fold dilutions), plated on TSA plates using an Eddy Jet spiral plater, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Bacterial viability was assessed using a Flash & Go colony counter. The minimum biofilm eradication concentration at 24 h (MBEC24h) was defined as the minimum concentration required to achieve a 5-log reduction in bacterial viability compared to untreated cells (i.e., reduced bacterial counts from 108 to 103 CFU/mL). The corresponding NO dose was calculated by multiplying the MBEC24h of the alginate samples (mg/mL) with the NO released in PBS (pH 7.4; µmol NO/mg alginate) over the testing period.

Time-based biofilm eradication assay.

P. aeruginosa biofilms were grown and treated with NO-releasing alginates (8 mg/mL) following the same protocol as for the biofilm eradication assays. Blanks were included to ensure bacteria viability over the duration of the experiment. The samples were incubated with gentle shaking at 37 °C for 1–24 h before plating on TSA plates using an Eddy Jet spiral plater and incubating overnight at 37 °C. Bacterial viability was assessed using a Flash & Go colony counter. A similar experiment was carried out at the MBEC24h for Alg-PAPA/NO and Alg-SPER/NO for comparison to time-based killing at 8 mg/mL.

In vitro cytotoxicity assay.

A549 human respiratory epithelial cells were grown in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10 vol% FBS and 1 wt% penicillin streptomycin. Cells were incubated in 5 vol % CO2 under humidified/aerobic conditions at 37 °C. After reaching 80% confluency, the cells were seeded onto 96-well polystyrene plates at a density of 2 × 103 cells/well, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The supernatant was then aspirated and replaced with 100 µL of alginate in fresh growth medium with a final concentration of test material equivalent to MBEC24h against P. aeruginosa or S. aureus biofilms. After 24 h incubation at 37 °C, the supernatant was aspirated and the wells containing the cells were washed with PBS. A 100 µL mixture of RPMI 1640/MTS/PMS (105/20/1, v/v/v) was added to each well. After an additional 90 min incubation period (37 °C), the absorbances of the wells were measured at 490 nm using a Thermoscientific Multiskan EX plate reader (Waltham, MA). A blank mixture of RPMI 1640/MTS/PMS and untreated cells were used as the blank and control, respectively. Cell viability for each sample was calculated as follows:

%cellviability=Abs490AbsblankAbscontrolAbsblank×100 (eq.1)

Results and Discussion

Alginates are found in nature as polydisperse, water soluble high molecular weight polymers (200–500 kDa).26,27 Prior research has demonstrated the ease by which these polymers undergo oxidative degradation to form lower molecular weight oligosaccharides.41,43 In this regard, the oxidative degradation reaction conditions were optimized to yield alginate oligosaccharides of ~5 kDa molecular weight to allow for comparison to other previously reported water-soluble NO-releasing biopolymer systems.40 The addition of secondary amine-bearing functional groups to the alginate backbone allows for the subsequent formation of N-diazeniumdiolate NO donors. This class of NO donor facilitates spontaneous NO release in physiological media. In the present study, a series of small molecule NO donor precursors were linked to the carboxylic acid functional groups of both high molecular weight (~300 kDa) and low molecular weight (~5 kDa) alginates via EDC/NHS reactions (Scheme 1) to enable tuning of the NO-release kinetics. Of note, pH 6.5 phosphate buffer saline was employed to avoid gelation of alginate.30 The reaction was optimized to maximize alkyl amine modification while minimizing the possibility of crosslinking between the alginate backbone and the diamine functional groups (i.e., DETA, DPTA, SPER). The average molecular weight (Mw) was dependent on the molar excess of the alkyl amine added to the reaction solution (Table S4). For example, maintaining the molar ratio at 1:1 resulted in a significant increase in the molecular weight of the alkyl amine-modified alginate (e.g. Alg300-SPER with Mw ~700 kDa), suggesting possible crosslinking with the biopolymer. Increasing the molar ratio of the diamine functional group minimized this effect (Table S4). Of note, no crosslinking was observed with the low molecular weight systems regardless of the molar ratio employed. The gel phase was avoided entirely when using the optimized reaction conditions. Polyamine functionalization was also confirmed using 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and elemental analysis (Figures S1, S2, S3, and S4). The nitrogen content of the alginates increased from 0 to 5–8 wt% with amine modification (Table S1). This value translates to ~40–50 % modification of the carboxylic acid functional groups. A positive shift in zeta potential was also noted upon amine modification, corresponding to the formation of protonated amine groups at pH 7.4 (Table S1).

Synthesis of N-diazeniumdiolate-functionalized alginate.

The secondary amine-modified alginates were charged with high pressures of NO (10 bar) in basic aqueous solution (50 mM NaOH) to allow efficient formation of N-diazeniumdiolate NO donors (Scheme 2). The formation of the NO donors was confirmed using UV-vis spectroscopy and the appearance of a characteristic absorbance band at 253 nm (Figure S5).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Synthesis of N-diazeniumdiolate-modified alginates.

Representative NO-release profiles of the N-diazeniumdiolate-functionalized alginates in PBS (pH 7.4) at 37 °C are shown in Figure 1. Both high and low molecular weight alginates were found to have similar NO totals that were comparable to other macromolecular NO-releasing biopolymeric scaffolds (0.3–0.6 µmol/mg).40,4447 A broad range of NO-release kinetics was also observed for the alginate scaffolds with Alg300-PAPA/NO and Alg5-PAPA/NO having the shortest NO-release half-lives (~0.5 and ~0.3 h, respectively) or fastest NO donor breakdown. In contrast, the NO release of Alg300-DETA/NO and Alg5-DETA/NO was highly prolonged (NO-release half-lives of ~40 and 29 h, respectively). The NO-release duration varied as a function of amine precursor structure, following trends previously reported for the corresponding small molecule NO donors (i.e., DETA, DPTA, PAPA, and SPER).48,49 A decrease in the NO-release half-life (i.e., faster NO release) was clearly observed upon using the longer chain length alkyl amines.38,48,49 The terminal, positively charged primary amine appeared to stabilize the negative charge of the N-diazeniumdiolate NO donor, increasing the NO-release half-life for DETA-, DPTA-, and SPER-modified alginates compared to the PAPA-modified biopolymer (Scheme 2)..49 The molecular weight of the alginate also dramatically influenced the NO release. For example, the Alg5 oligosaccharides released NO more rapidly than the larger Alg300 analogs modified with the same amine precursor (Table 1). In addition, negligible NO release was observed for control alginates modified with ethylenediamine (EDA), resulting in a biopolymer containing only amide and primary amine groups. These results confirmed that neither the amide nor primary amine functional groups are able to react with NO under the conditions used for N-diazeniumdiolate formation (Table S5). Overall, these experiments demonstrate exquisite NO-release tunability by simply varying the molecular weight of the scaffold and/or the chemical structure of an amine precursor grafted onto the alginate backbone.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Real time NO-release profiles for the first 1 h and (B) plot of total NO release vs. time for Alg300-DETA/NO (solid), Alg300-DPTA/NO (dash), Alg300-SPER/NO (dash-dot), and Alg300-PAPA/NO (dot) measured via chemiluminescence in pH 7.4 PBS.

Table 1.

Nitric oxide-release properties of N-diazeniumdiolate-functionalized alginates in PBS (pH 7.4, 37 °C).a

Scaffold t[NO]b (µmol/mg) [NO]maxc (ppb/mg) t1/2d (h) tde (h) t[NO]4hf (µmol/mg)
Alg300-DETA/NO 0.40 ± 0.04 232 ± 78 13.1 ± 5.8 40.3 ± 14.2 0.10 ± 0.01
Alg300-DPTA/NO 0.42 ± 0.04 428 ± 124 3.4 ± 0.6 16.1 ± 2.9 0.23 ± 0.01
Alg300-PAPA/NO 0.61 ± 0.13 2110 ± 1240 0.5 ± 0.1 6.1 ± 1.0 0.59 ± 0.11
Alg300-SPER/NO 0.65 ± 0.16 1236 ± 240 1.3 ± 0.4 14.6 ± 3.5 0.49 ± 0.11
Alg5-DETA/NO 0.33 ± 0.03 101 ± 30 9.8 ± 0.1 29.3 ± 1.7 0.08 ± 0.03
Alg5-DPTA/NO 0.48 ± 0.02 1157 ± 227 1.2 ± 0.1 8.7 ± 0.5 0.45 ± 0.10
Alg5-PAPA/NO 0.55 ± 0.11 3543 ± 908 0.3 ± 0.0 3.9 ± 0.3 0.55 ± 0.11
Alg5-SPER/NO 0.38 ± 0.03 477 ± 307 1.6 ± 0.2 11.1 ± 0.8 0.25 ± 0.04
a

Error represent standard deviation for n ≥ 3 experiments.

b

Total NO released.

c

Maximum flux of NO release.

d

NO-release half-life.

e

Duration of NO release.

f

Total NO released after 4 h.

Antibacterial action against planktonic bacteria.

The antibacterial activity of control and NO-releasing alginates was evaluated against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, two prevalent pathogens associated with infections.6,50 Bacterial viability assays were performed under static conditions to extract the minimum bactericidal concentration of the test agent required to elicit a 3-log reduction (i.e., 99.9% killing) in bacterial viability over 4 h (MBC4h). The non-NO-releasing controls did not significantly impact bacterial viability up to 16 mg/mL for both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus (Figure S6). In contrast, low concentrations (< 8mg/mL), led to a 3-log reduction (≥99.9 %) in bacterial viability for each of the NO-releasing alginate scaffolds (Table 2), with the less negatively charged alkyl amine-modified alginate requiring the least amount to achieve bactericidal activity (Table S1). Other studies have reported that positively charged scaffolds associate more readily with bacteria with a concomitant enhancement in bactericidal action.40,51 The alginates herein followed a similar trend, with Alg300-SPER/NO (zeta potential −13.0 mV) eradicating bacteria at the lowest concentration while Alg300-PAPA/NO (−33.4 mV) necessitated the largest (Table S1). Nitric oxide-release kinetics also influenced the bactericidal action for the alginate materials, with the fastest (Alg300-PAPA/NO) and slowest (Alg300-DETA/NO) NO-releasing systems requiring greater concentrations relative to alginates with moderate release kinetics. Despite larger overall NO payloads (~0.6 µmol/mg), the faster NO release associated with Alg300-PAPA/NO may liberate NO prematurely prior to the alginate associating with the bacteria, which could then facilitate more efficient delivery of lethal NO doses to the bacteria. Indeed, other macromolecular NO-release systems (e.g., silica) required 20 min to elicit NO build up within P. aeruginosa as studied via confocal microscopy.15 The elevated concentrations of NO-releasing alginates needed for eradication using Alg300-DETA/NO are likewise attributed to insufficient NO released over the 4h MBC assay (~0.10 µmol/mg) compared to the other NO donor modifications (i.e., DPTA, PAPA, SPER).

Table 2.

Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC4h) of NO-releasing alginates against planktonic P. aeruginosa and S. aureus.a

Scaffold P. aeruginosa S. aureus

MBC4h (mg/mL) NO doseb (µmol/mL) MBC4h (mg/mL) NO doseb (µmol/mL)
Alg300-DETA/NO 4 0.40 ± 0.04 8 0.80 ± 0.08
Alg300-DPTA/NO 2 0.45 ± 0.01 4 0.88 ± 0.02
Alg300-PAPA/NO 2 1.18 ± 0.24 8 4.75 ± 0.95
Alg300-SPER/NO 1 0.49 ± 0.11 4 1.96 ± 0.45
Alg5-DETA/NO 2 0.20 ± 0.02 4 0.40 ± 0.04
Alg5-DPTA/NO 0.25 0.11 ± 0.01 2 0.92 ± 0.01
Alg5-PAPA/NO 0.5 0.30 ± 0.06 8 4.69 ± 0.88
Alg5-SPER/NO 0.25 0.07 ± 0.01 2 0.54 ± 0.09
a

Error represent standard deviation for n ≥ 3 experiments.

b

NO dose was calculated from NO totals of each tested sample at 4 h in PBS (10 mM, pH 7.4, 37 °C).

A similar dependence on NO-release kinetics was observed for the low molecular weight alginates with both Alg5-SPER/NO and Alg5-DPTA/NO having the lowest MBC4h. Of note, the concentrations of NO-releasing alginate oligosaccharides required to eradicate bacteria were significantly lower than their high molecular weight counterparts. Similar size-dependent effects were reported for NO-releasing silica, a denser (i.e., harder) material.20,52 For biopolymers specifically, Liu et al. reported more effective antibacterial action with lower molecular weight NO-releasing chitosan.53 Our results indicate that the use of lower molecular weight alginates also allows for more efficient NO delivery, in turn reducing the required NO dose for eradicating planktonic bacteria.

For both high and low molecular weight alginates, greater concentrations of NO-releasing derivations were necessary to achieve bactericidal activity against S. aureus relative to P. aeruginosa (Table 2). The thicker peptidoglycan layer of S. aureus likely decreases the diffusion of NO into the bacterium, necessitating larger doses of the macromolecule to achieve equivalent killing.54 Gram-negative bacteria such as P. aeruginosa generally have a more lipid-rich outer membrane and thinner peptidoglycan sheets, increasing their susceptibility to NO and other permeating antimicrobials.54

Anti-biofilm efficacy.

In addition to exhibiting bactericidal action against planktonic bacteria, the NO-releasing alginate scaffolds were also highly effective against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilms. Similar to the planktonic assays, the concentrations of NO-releasing alginate oligosaccharides were lower for eradicating the biofilms relative to the higher molecular weight systems (Table 3), further emphasizing the role of NO delivery scaffold on bactericidal action. Greater biocidal action was also noted against P. aeruginosa over S. aureus biofilms. Worley et al. previously reported reduced penetration of NO-releasing poly(amido amine) dendrimers into S. aureus biofilms relative to P. aeruginosa.22 Such differences can be attributed to the biofilm architectures. The exopolysaccharide matrix of S. aureus biofilms produce greater levels of polysaccharide and extracellular proteins that hinder the diffusion of antibacterial agents such as NO.22,55 Coupled with the peptidoglycan differences, these structural advantages account for the lower susceptibility of S. aureus biofilms. Nevertheless, the broad-spectrum action of NO is clearly capable of eradicating both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial biofilms.

Table 3.

Minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBEC24h) of NO-releasing alginates against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilms.a

Scaffold P. aeruginosa S. aureus

MBEC24h (mg/mL) NO doseb (µmol/mL) MBEC24h (mg/mL) NO doseb (µmol/mL)
Alg300-DETA/NO 8 2.6 ± 0.5 16 6.2 ± 0.2
Alg300-DPTA/NO 8 3.4 ± 0.0 16 6.8 ± 0.1
Alg300-PAPA/NO 32 19.6 ± 3.8 64 39.2 ± 7.6
Alg300-SPER/NO 16 10.3 ± 1.8 32 20.7 ± 3.6
Alg5-DETA/NO 4 1.8 ± 0.5 8 3.6 ± 1.1
Alg5-DPTA/NO 4 1.7 ± 0.2 4 1.7 ± 0.2
Alg5-PAPA/NO 16 9.8 ± 2.0 16 9.8 ± 2.0
Alg5-SPER/NO 4 1.3 ± 0.2 8 2.8 ± 0.2
a

Error represent standard deviation for n ≥ 3 experiments.

b

NO dose was calculated from 24 h NO totals of each tested sample in PBS (10 mM, pH 7.4, 37 °C).

Following the size-dependent trend observed in the planktonic studies, the less negatively charged alginate systems required lower alginate concentrations to elicit biocidal activity, with the exception of Alg300-SPER/NO. Despite having the least negative charge of the evaluated alginate systems (Table S1), the large NO flux and rapid release half-life for Alg300-SPER/NO (Table 1) likely results in undesirable NO donor breakdown similar to that noted for both Alg300-PAPA/NO and Alg5-PAPA/NO. In this respect, the overall biocidal efficacy of the NO-releasing scaffold depends on both the charge of the scaffold and the NO-release kinetics. Alginate scaffolds with moderate to extended NO-release durations (t1/2 ≥ 2 h) consistently require lower alginate concentrations and NO doses to eradicate biofilm-based bacteria, regardless of the alginate molecular weight or bacteria Gram class. In this regard, the slower, sustained NO release ensures more effective NO delivery. This result is in agreement with previous studies using different NO-releasing systems.20,23,24

P. aeruginosa biofilms were treated with equal concentrations (8 mg/mL) of each high molecular weight NO-releasing alginate (Figure 2A) to study bacterial viability as a function of release kinetics. The high molecular weight alginate scaffolds were selected for this experiment as they demonstrated the largest range in NO-release kinetics. A concentration of 8 mg/mL represented the lowest MBEC24h for the Alg300 systems. At 1 h, treatment with either Alg300-PAPA/NO or Alg300-SPER/NO resulted in a 1- to 2-log reduction in biofilm bacterial viability, as expected based on the NO-release half-lives for the two NO-releasing alginates (~0.5–1.4 h). However, the low NO levels released from the fast NO-releasing alginate at longer durations were insufficient for bacterial killing, with P. aeruginosa viability recovering to ~108 CFU/mL after 4 h. In contrast to the fast NO-release systems, the slower NO-releasing alginate scaffolds (~4 and 13 h for Alg300-DPTA/NO and Alg300-DETA/NO, respectively) elicited a more gradual decrease in bacteria viability at this same concentration (i.e., 8 mg/mL), eventually leading to a 5-log reduction after 8 h of treatment. At the larger concentrations required to achieve the MBEC24h, both Alg300-PAPA/NO (32 mg/mL) and Alg300-SPER/NO (16 mg/mL) elicited a 5-log reduction in bacterial viability after only 1 and 4 h exposures, respectively, but resulted in observable bacterial growth after 24 h (Figure 2B). The greater alginate (and NO) concentrations improved the antibacterial efficacy of the faster NO-releasing alginates through rapid killing induced by the large initial NO burst. Overall, these results suggest that slower, more sustained NO release is preferred for biofilm eradication at the smaller alginate concentrations.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Time-based bactericidal efficacy of Alg300-DETA/NO (square), Alg300-DPTA/NO (circle), Alg300-SPER/NO (triangle), and Alg300-PAPA/NO (diamond). Comparison of all high molecular weight NO-releasing alginates at equivalent concentrations of 8 mg/mL is presented in (A), and the time-based killing of the fast NO-releasing systems (Alg300-SPER/NO and Alg300-PAPA/NO) at their respective MBEC24h is presented in (B). Studies consisted of at least three experiments with error bars representing the standard deviation.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity against A549 cells.

An attractive property of alginates for biomedical applications is the perceived favorable toxicity to mammalian cells. Of course, the influence of the N-diazeniumdiolate modification on cytotoxicity might elicit unexpected toxicity. Thus, the cytotoxicity of the alginate scaffolds was evaluated using human respiratory epithelial (A549) cells at the alginate MBECs determined to kill P. aeruginoa and S. aureus.5660 As shown in Figure 3, neither control nor the NO-releasing alginates exhibited significant toxicity (i.e., cell viabilities >70%) against A549 cells at the determined MBEC24h values, regardless of size (i.e., molecular weight) or charge, highlighting the advantage of these biopolymers as anti-biofilm agents. The low to negligible toxicity of the NO-releasing alginates at the bactericidal concentrations shows promise for the use of these macromolecules as antibacterial and anti-biofilm treatment for wound healing and respiratory infections, for example.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Viability of A549 human respiratory epithelial cells exposed to control and NO-releasing (white) and control (dash) alginates at the MBEC24h against (A) P. aeruginosa and (B) S. aureus. Studies consisted of at least three experiments with error bars representing the standard deviation.

Conclusions

N-diazeniumdiolate-modified alginate scaffolds were synthesized with diverse NO-release kinetics (0.5–13 h half-lives) and antibacterial properties. The biocidal efficacies of the NO-releasing alginate materials were demonstrated against both planktonic and biofilm-based forms of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Alginate modifications that exhibited slow and sustained NO release (e.g., Alg300-DPTA/NO and Alg300-DETA/NO) proved to be highly effective against bacterial biofilms, requiring lower NO-releasing alginate to elicit eradication. The molecular weight of the scaffold proved important with the oligosaccharides eliciting the greatest antibacterial action. Both amine-modified (control) and NO-releasing alginates exerted minimal toxicity against A549 cells, demonstrating the biocompatible properties of the bare scaffold. Nitric oxide-releasing alginates may prove useful as novel antibacterial agents for treating acute and chronic infections. Experiments are currently underway to evaluate the biocidal efficacy of these materials against a broader spectrum of bacteria strains, including clinical isolates that are resistant to conventional antibiotics.

Supplementary Material

SI

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. David Hill at the Marsico Lung Institute at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for assistance with culturing the A549 cells used in this study. Likewise, the authors would like to thank Mr. Evan Feura for assistance with molecular weight measurements.

Funding Sources

Financial support was provided by the National Institutes of Health (AI112029).

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information. The following file is available free of charge.

Elemental analysis, zeta potential measurements, molecular weight studies, 1H and 13C NMR spectra of alginates, UV-vis absorbance spectra of control and NO-releasing alginate, NO-release properties of control primary-amine modified alginate, bacterial viability plots for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in planktonic and biofilm forms. and controls (PDF)

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): Mark Schoenfisch is a cofounder, a member of the board of directors, and maintains financial interest in Novan Therapeutics, Inc. and Novoclem Therapeutics, Inc. Both companies commercialize macromolecular nitric oxide storage and release vehicles for clinical indications.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Levy SB; Marshall B Antibacterial Resistance Worldwide: Causes, Challenges and Responses. Nat. Med 2004, 10, S122–S129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Robson MC Wound Infection: A Failure of Wound Healing Caused by an Imbalance of Bacteria. Surg. Clin. N. Am 1997, 77, 637–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Wright GD The Antibiotic Resistome: The Nexus of Chemical and Genetic Diversity. Nat. Rev. Micro 2007, 5, 175–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Stewart PS; William Costerton J Antibiotic Resistance of Bacteria in Biofilms. Lancet 2001, 358, 135–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Pruitt BA; McManus AT; Kim SH; Goodwin CW Burn Wound Infections: Current Status. World J. Surg 1998, 22, 135–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Lyczak JB; Cannon CL; Pier GB Lung Infections Associated with Cystic Fibrosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 2002, 15, 122–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Hall-Stoodley L; Stoodley P Evolving Concepts in Biofilm Infections. Cell Microbiol 2009, 11, 1034–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Smith AW Biofilms and Antibiotic Therapy: Is There a Role for Combating Bacterial Resistance by the Use of Novel Drug Delivery Systems? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 2005, 57, 1539–1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Donlan RM Biofilm Formation: A Clinically Relevant Microbiological Process. Clin. Infect. Dis 2001, 33, 1387–1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Boucher HW; Talbot GH; Bradley JS; Edwards JE; Gilbert D; Rice LB; Scheld M; Spellberg B; Bartlett J Bad Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE! An Update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis 2009, 48, 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Barraud N; Hassett DJ; Hwang SH; Rice SA; Kjelleberg S; Webb JS Involvement of Nitric Oxide in Biofilm Dispersal of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol 2006, 188, 7344–7353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Carpenter AW; Schoenfisch MH Nitric Oxide Release: Part II. Therapeutic Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev 2012, 41, 3742–3752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Barraud N; Kelso MJ; Rice SA; Kjellerberg S Nitric Oxide: A Key Mediator of Biofilm Dispersal with Applications in Infectious Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des 2015, 21, 31–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Riccio DA; Schoenfisch MH Nitric Oxide Release: Part I. Macromolecular Scaffolds. Chem. Soc. Rev 2012, 41, 3731–3741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Hetrick EM; Shin JH; Stasko NA; Johnson CB; Wespe DA; Holmuhamedov E; Schoenfisch MH Bactericidal Efficacy of Nitric Oxide-Releasing Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 235–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Privett BJ; Broadnax AD; Bauman SJ; Riccio DA; Schoenfisch MH Examination of Bacterial Resistance to Exogenous Nitric Oxide. Nitric Oxide 2012, 26, 169–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Keefer LK Fifty Years of Diazeniumdiolate Research. From Laboratory Curiosity to Broad-Spectrum Biomedical Advances. ACS Chem. Biol 2011, 6, 1147–1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Backlund CJ; Worley BV; Sergesketter AR; Schoenfisch MH. Kinetic-Dependent Killing of Oral Pathogens with Nitric Oxide. J. Dent. Res 2015, 94, 1092–1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Lu Y; Slomberg DL; Sun B; Schoenfisch MH Shape- and Nitric Oxide Flux-Dependent Bactericidal Activity of Nitric Oxide-Releasing Silica Nanorods. Small 2013, 9, 2189–2198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Slomberg DL; Lu Y; Broadnax AD; Hunter RA; Carpenter AW; Schoenfisch MH Role of Size and Shape on Biofilm Eradication for Nitric Oxide-Releasing Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 9322–9329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Wo Y; Brisbois EJ; Bartlett RH; Meyerhoff ME Recent Advances in Thromboresistant and Antimicrobial Polymers for Biomedical Applications: Just Say Yes to Nitric Oxide (NO). Biomater. Sci 2016, 4, 1161–1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Worley BV; Schilly KM; Schoenfisch MH. Anti-Biofilm Efficacy of Dual-Action Nitric Oxide-Releasing Alkyl Chain Modified Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimers. Mol. Pharm 2015, 12, 1573–1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Duong HTT; Jung K; Kutty SK; Agustina S; Adnan NNM; Basuki JS; Kumar N; Davis TP; Barraud N; Boyer C Nanoparticle (Star Polymer) Delivery of Nitric Oxide Effectively Negates Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilm Formation. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 2583–2589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Sadrearhami Z; Yeow J; Nguyen T-K; Ho KKK; Kumar N; Boyer C Biofilm Dispersal Using Nitric Oxide Loaded Nanoparticles Fabricated by Photo-PISA: Influence of Morphology. Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 12894–12897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Nair LS; Laurencin CT Biodegradable Polymers as Biomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci 2007, 32, 762–798. [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Alnaief M; Alzaitoun MA; Garcia-Gonzalez CA; Smirnova I Preparation of Biodegradable Nanoporous Microspherical Aerogel Based on Alginate. Carbohydr. Polym 2011, 84, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Bernkop-Schnürch A; Kast CE; Richter MF Improvement in the Mucoadhesive Properties of Alginate by the Covalent Attachment of Cysteine. J. Control. Release 2001, 71, 277–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Khan S; Tøndervik A; Sletta H; Klinkenberg G; Emanuel C; Onsøyen E; Myrvold R; Howe RA; Walsh TR; Hill KE; et al. Overcoming Drug Resistance with Alginate Oligosaccharides Able To Potentiate the Action of Selected Antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2012, 56, 5134–5141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Pritchard MF; Powell LC; Menzies GE; Lewis PD; Hawkins K; Wright C; Doull I; Walsh TR; Onsøyen E; Dessen A; et al. A New Class of Safe Oligosaccharide Polymer Therapy to Modify the Mucus Barrier of Chronic Respiratory Disease. Mol. Pharm 2016, 13, 863–873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Draget KI; Taylor C Chemical, Physical and Biological Properties of Alginates and Their Biomedical Implications. Food Hydrocoll 2011, 25, 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Liakos I; Rizzello L; Scurr DJ; Pompa PP All-Natural Composite Wound Dressing Films of Essential Oils Encapsulated in Sodium Alginate with Antimicrobial Properties. Int. J. Pharm 2014, 463, 137–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Paul W; Sharma CP Chitosan and Alginate Wound Dressings: A Short Review. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs 2004, 18, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Matai I; Gopinath P Chemically Cross-Linked Hybrid Nanogels of Alginate and PAMAM Dendrimers as Efficient Drug Delivery Vehicles. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng 2016, 2, 213–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Nordgård CT; Draget KI Oligosaccharides as Modulators of Rheology in Complex Mucous Systems. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3084–3090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Nordgård CT; Nonstad U; Olderø MØ; Espevik T; Draget KI Alterations in Mucus Barrier Function and Matrix Structure Induced by Guluronate Oligomers. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 2294–2300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Gombotz WR; Wee S Protein Release from Alginate Matrices. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 1998, 31, 267–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Lee KY; Mooney DJ Alginate: Properties and Biomedical Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci 2012, 37, 106–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Davies KM; Wink DA; Saavedra JE; Keefer LK Chemistry of the Diazeniumdiolates. 2. Kinetics and Mechanism of Dissociation to Nitric Oxide in Aqueous Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2001, 123, 5473–5481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Keefer LK; Nims RW; Davies KM; Wink DA Diazeniumdiolates as NO Dosage Forms. Methods Enymol 1996, 268, 281–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Lu Y; Slomberg DL; Schoenfisch MH Nitric Oxide-Releasing Chitosan Oligosaccharides as Antibacterial Agents. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 1716–1724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Mao S; Zhang T; Sun W; Ren X The Depolymerization of Sodium Alginate by Oxidative Degradation. Pharm. Dev. Technol 2012, 17, 763–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Breed RS; Dotterrer WD The Number of Colonies Allowable on Satisfactory Agar Plates. J. Bacteriol 1916, 1, 321–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Boontheekul T; Kong H-J; Mooney DJ Controlling Alginate Gel Degradation Utilizing Partial Oxidation and Bimodal Molecular Weight Distribution. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 2455–2465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Lu Y; Shah A; Hunter RA; Soto RJ; Schoenfisch MH S-Nitrosothiol-Modified Nitric Oxide-Releasing Chitosan Oligosaccharides as Antibacterial Agents. Acta Biomater 2015, 12, 62–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Lutzke A; Pegalajar-Jurado A; Neufeld BH; Reynolds MM Nitric Oxide-Releasing S-Nitrosated Derivatives of Chitin and Chitosan for Biomedical Applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 7449–7458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Damodaran VB; Reynolds MM Biodegradable S-Nitrosothiol Tethered Multiblock Polymer for Nitric Oxide Delivery. J. Mater. Chem 2011, 21, 5870–5872. [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Wold KA; Damodaran VB; Suazo LA; Bowen RA; Reynolds MM Fabrication of Biodegradable Polymeric Nanofibers with Covalently Attached NO Donors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 3022–3030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Keefer LK Nitric Oxide (NO)- and Nitroxyl (HNO)-Generating Diazeniumdiolates (NONOates): Emerging Commercial Opoortunities. Curr. Top. Med. Chem 2005, 5, 625–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Hrabie JA; Klose JR; Wink DA; Keefer LK New Nitric Oxide-Releasing Zwitterions Derived from Polyamines. J. Org. Chem 1993, 58, 1472–1476. [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Jensen PØ; Madsen KG; Phipps R; Krogfelt K; Høiby N; Givskov M Why Chronic Wounds Will Not Heal: A Novel Hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen 2008, 16, 2–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Sun B; Slomberg DL; Chudasama SL; Lu Y; Schoenfisch MH Nitric Oxide-Releasing Dendrimers as Antibacterial Agents. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 3343–3354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Carpenter AW; Slomberg DL; Rao KS; Schoenfisch MH Influence of Scaffold Size on Bactericidal Activity of Nitric Oxide-Releasing Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 7235–7244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Liu N; Chen X-G; Park HJ; Liu CG; Liu CS; Meng XH; Yu LJ Effect of MW and Concentration of Chitosan on Antibacterial Activity of Escherichia Coli. Carbohydr. Polym 2006, 64, 60–65. [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Beveridge TJ Structures of Gram-Negative Cell Walls and Their Derived Membrane Vesicles. J. Bacteriol 1999, 181, 4725–4733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Hall-Stoodley L; Costerton JW; Stoodley P Bacterial Biofilms: From the Natural Environment to Infectious Diseases. Nat. Rev. Micro 2004, 2, 95–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Ahmed MU; Velkov T; Lin Y-W; Yun B; Nowell CJ; Zhou F; Zhou QT; Chan K; Azad MAK; Li J Potential Toxicity of Polymyxins in Human Lung Epithelial Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2017, 61, AAC.02690-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Hu W; Peng C; Luo W; Lv M; Li X; Li D; Huang Q; Fan C Graphene-Based Antibacterial Paper. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4317–4323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Miller C; McMullin B; Ghaffari A; Stenzler A; Pick N; Roscoe D; Ghahary A; Road J; Av-Gay Y Gaseous Nitric Oxide Bactericidal Activity Retained during Intermittent High-Dose Short Duration Exposure. Nitric Oxide 2009, 20, 16–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Padmavathi V; Sudhakar Reddy G; Padmaja A; Kondaiah P; Ali-Shazia. Synthesis, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles, 1,3,4-Thiadiazoles and 1,2,4-Triazoles. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2009, 44, 2106–2112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Halwani M; Yebio B; Suntres ZE; Alipour M; Azghani AO; Omri A Co-Encapsulation of Gallium with Gentamicin in Liposomes Enhances Antimicrobial Activity of Gentamicin against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 2008, 62, 1291–1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES