Abstract
Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome is a common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. The anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is an unusual but occasional contributor. We review our experience with this anomalous muscle in elbows with cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 13 patients noted to have an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle associated with cubital tunnel syndrome. Results: Ten patients had unilateral ulnar neuropathy supported by nerve conduction studies. Three had bilateral cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms with 1 of those having normal nerve conduction studies for both elbows. Eight elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. The other 8 elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only. All but 1 patient had either clinical resolution or improvement of symptoms at follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 1 year after surgery. The 1 patient who had persistent symptoms had received myotomy and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only. Conclusions: An anomalous anconeus epitrochlearis occasionally results in compression of the ulnar nerve but is usually an incidental finding. Its contribution to compression neuropathy can be tested intraoperatively by passively ranging the elbow while observing the change in vector and tension of its muscle fibers over the ulnar nerve. Regardless of findings, we recommend myotomy of the muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve. Submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve may be necessary if there is subluxation.
Keywords: anomalous muscle, compression syndrome, myotomy, ulnar nerve transposition, ulnar neuropathy, anatomy of upper extremity
Introduction
Described in 1867 by Austrian anatomist Gruber, the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is a common anomalous muscle that originates from the medial epicondyle of the humerus, arches over the ulnar nerve, and inserts onto the medial olecranon.12,18 Although presumed to be an atavistic structure in humans, it is frequently present in amphibians, reptiles, and most mammals.9 Receiving its innervation via the ulnar nerve, the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is thought to function as an elbow adductor, elbow extensor, and forearm supinator; it may also possibly offer some protection to the ulnar nerve.9,18
The anconeus epitrochlearis muscle draws our surgical attention due to its implication as an unusual cause of cubital tunnel syndrome. The English-language literature includes reports of several cases. We report our experience with 16 elbows in 13 patients, in whom an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle was associated with cubital tunnel syndrome.
Methods
After institutional review board approval (PRO00017066), we identified 19 consecutive patients treated by our senior authors for cubital tunnel syndrome with the mention of an anconeus epitrochlearis in their operative report between 1999 and 2016. In our retrospective review of these charts, we collected the following variables: date of operation, age at time of operation, gender, operative side, preoperative symptoms, nerve conduction study and imaging results, treatment, follow-up interval, and outcome.
Results
Of the 19 charts reviewed, we excluded 6 for incomplete follow-up data. As a result, between years 1999 and 2016, we identified 16 elbows in 13 patients with an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle associated with cubital tunnel syndrome (Table 1). Review of intraoperative photos and operative notes demonstrated significant variation in the size of the muscle. Some were large and fleshy, while others mostly fascial bands. Only 1 patient (8%) was female, though she has bilateral elbows included in this study. Five of 16 elbows (31%) were on the right. Eight elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve prior to year 2010. One of these elbows also had a lipoma associated at the surgical site, which was removed at the time of surgery. The following 8 elbows had myotomy of the anomalous muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only without transposition. All but 1 patient in the myotomy and in situ decompression only group had either clinical resolution or improvement of their symptoms at follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 1 year following surgery. Median follow-up was 6 months.
Table 1.
Summary of Cases.
| Age | Gender | Side | Symptoms | Exam and tests | Treatment | Outcome | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | M | R | Paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution and a soft mass over elbow | Abnormal NCS and mass on MRI | Removal of lipoma, myotomy and transposition | Relief from symptoms | 1 y |
| 27 | M | L | Bilateral paresthesias and cramping in ulnar nerve distribution | Normal NCS | Myotomy and transposition | Relief from symptoms | 6 wk |
| 27 | M | R | Bilateral paresthesias and cramping in ulnar nerve distribution | Normal NCS | Myotomy and transposition | Relief from symptoms | 1 y |
| 55 | M | L | Numbness and weakness in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and transposition | Improved symptoms | 1 y |
| 46 | F | L | Bilateral paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and transposition | Relief from symptoms | 6 mo |
| 47 | F | R | Bilateral paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and transposition | Relief from symptoms | 6 mo |
| 58 | M | L | Paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and transposition | Improved symptoms | 1 y |
| 59 | M | R | Numbness in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Improved symptoms | 6 mo |
| 61 | M | L | Burning pain in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Improved symptoms | 2 wk |
| 40 | M | L | Burning pain and weakness in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Improved strength | 4 wk |
| 59 | M | L | Numbness and weakness in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Improved symptoms | 4 wk |
| 64 | M | L | Paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Relief from symptoms | 3 wk |
| 63 | M | L | Paresthesias and weakness in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Improved symptoms | 7 wk |
| 67 | M | L | Pain and paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Persistent symptoms | 6 mo |
| 62 | M | L | Numbness in ulnar nerve distribution and pain at elbow | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Relief from symptoms | 2 wk |
| 56 | M | R | Numbness in ulnar nerve distribution | Abnormal NCS | Myotomy and in situ release only | Relief from symptoms | 3 wk |
Note. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; NCS = nerve conduction study.
Discussion
Cadaver studies report the incidence of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle to be anywhere from 4% to 34% (Table 2). Gruber found the muscle in 34 of 100 (34%) cadavers,12 LeDouble in 32 of 102 (32%) cadavers,18 Bando in 45 of 157 (29%) cadavers,2 Von Clemens in 4 of 100 (4%) elbows,24 Mumenthaler in 10 of 56 (18%) cadavers,20 Dahners and Wood in 9 of 212 (4%) cadavers,7 Dellon in 7 of 64 (11%) cadavers,8 O’Driscoll et al in 3 of 27 (11%) elbows,21 and Campbell et al in 14 of 130 (11%) cadaver elbows.5 Of note, Campbell et al also found a dense fibrotendinous band, which the authors called an epitrochleoanconeus ligament, in 6 of 130 (5%) cadaver elbows.5
Table 2.
Summary of Incidence of Anconeus Epitrochlearis.
| Author | Reference | Year | n (%) | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gruber | 12 | 1867 | 34/100 (34%) | Cadaveric |
| LeDouble | 18 | 1897 | 32/102 (32%) | Cadaveric |
| Bando | 2 | 1956 | 45/157 (29%) | Cadaveric |
| Von Clemens | 24 | 1957 | 4/100 (4%) | Cadaveric |
| Mumenthaler | 20 | 1958 | 10/56 (18%) | Cadaveric |
| Dahners & Wood | 7 | 1973 | 9/212 (4%) | Cadaveric |
| Dellon | 8 | 1986 | 7/64 (11%) | Cadaveric |
| O’Driscoll et al | 21 | 1991 | 3/27 (11%) | Cadaveric |
| Campbell et al | 5 | 1991 | 14/130 (11%) | Cadaveric |
| Okamoto et al | 23 | 2000 | 2/32 (6%) | Ultrasound |
| Husarik et al | 15 | 2009 | 14/60 (23%) | Magnetic resonance imaging |
More recently, physicians have used modern imaging modalities to evaluate the elbow for an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle. Between 1993 and 1998, Okamoto et al used ultrasound for preoperative evaluation of 32 consecutive elbows diagnosed with cubital tunnel syndrome. They found evidence of an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle in 2 of the 32 (6%) patients, though when directly visualized intraoperatively, only 1 was actually found to have the anomalous muscle.23 The other patient was reported to have symptoms from a band and not the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle itself. From our observations, there seems to be significant variation in the size of the muscle, ranging from large and fleshy muscle to almost a fascial band in some instances.
In 2009, Husarik et al evaluated 60 asymptomatic patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of their dominant elbows and found an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle in 14 (23%) of the 60 patients, concluding that an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is a common MRI finding in asymptomatic elbows.15
There are largely anecdotal reports of cubital tunnel syndrome associated with an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle in the English literature (Table 3). Wachsmuth and Wilhelm reported on 16 cases with satisfactory relief of symptoms after myotomy and anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve.25 Other authors since then have also reported good results with myotomy and anterior transposition.6,17 Hirasawa et al reported a case of bilateral anconeus epitrochlearis muscle hypertrophy in an individual with a history of intense weight lifting and shot-putting.13 At surgery, both elbows underwent myotomy of the anomalous muscle. Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was performed only on the right elbow. Despite the contrasting treatment for each elbow, at 6-month follow-up all symptoms were relieved and the patient had improved grip strength bilaterally.
Table 3.
Summary of Previously Reported Cases.
| Author | Year | Patients | Symptoms | Special | Treatment | Outcome | Follow- up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boero et al | 2008 | 1 elbow 1 patient |
Elbow pain and paresthesia in ulnar distribution | Motor and sensory latency on EMG & NCV US visualized an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle compressing the ulnar nerve |
Myotomy | Resolution of symptoms | 3 mo |
| Gervasio | 2008 | 5 elbows 5 patients |
|||||
| Jeon et al | 2005 | 2 elbows 2 patients |
MRI | ||||
| Hsu | 2004 | 1 elbow 1 patient |
Ulnar distribution numbness and tingling | Concomitant ganglion cyst | Myotomy and excision of ganglion cyst | No recurrence of symptoms | 2 yr |
| O’Hara and Stone | 1996 | 1 elbow 1 patient |
Ulnar distribution numbness and tingling | Tinel sign over cubital tunnel Ulnar nerve compression by prominent medial head of triceps and anconeus epitrochlearis |
Myotomy | Resolution of symptoms | Early postoperative period |
| Masear et al | 1988 | 5 elbows 4 patients |
NCV measurements | Myotomy | Markedly improved | 19.5 mo (16-29 mo) | |
| Dahners and Wood | 1984 | 1 elbow 1 patient |
Ulnar distribution numbness and cramping | Symptoms exacerbated by plating the clarinet Tinel sign at cubital tunnel NCV sensory delay at elbow |
Myotomy | Relief of symptoms and able to play the clarinet without cramping | 3 mo |
| Gessini et al | 1981 | 1 elbow 1 patient |
Pain in elbow and forearm, paresthesia in ulnar distribution, and difficulty in fine movement | Motor and sensory NCV at elbow 16 m/sec | Myotomy | Persistent sensory deficit in ulnar distribution, persistent atrophy of hypothenar eminence and interossei muscles, and improvement of fine finger movements Motor NCV 25 m/sec and sensory NCV 16 m/sec |
1 mo |
| Hirasawa et al | 1979 | 2 elbows 1 patient |
Bilateral numbness and weakness | Intense weight lifting and shot-putting | Myotomy and transposition on R, myotomy only on L | Relief of symptoms and improvement in grip strength bilaterally | 6 mo |
| Chalmers | 1978 | ||||||
| Kurihara | 1977 | Myotomy and transposition | |||||
| Vander-pool et al | 1968 | ||||||
| Wachsmuth and Wilhelm | 1968 | 16 | Myotomy and transposition |
Note. EMG = electromyography; NCV = nerve conduction velocity; US = ultrasound; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.
Gessini et al reported on 1 case with delayed motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities at the elbow.11 The anconeus epitrochlearis muscle was surgically detached from the olecranon without transposition of the ulnar nerve. At 1-month follow-up, motor symptoms had improved, but without improvement in sensory symptoms. Dahners and Wood reported on 1 case treated with resection of a small portion of the muscle origin only.7 The patient had symptom relief and no recurrence at 3-month follow-up. Masear et al reported on 5 elbows with an anconeus epitrochlearis in a series of 42 surgical explorations to treat cubital tunnel syndrome.19 They described the epitrochleoanconeus ligament as a band form of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle.
O’Hara and Stone reported on 1 case treated with myotomy alone and without nerve transposition.22 Prompt resolution of symptoms was noted in the immediate postoperative period. Hsu et al reported on 1 case with concomitant compression by a 2 × 1 × 1 cm ganglion cyst.14 They decompressed the ulnar nerve by muscle resection and ganglion cyst excision without transposition of the nerve. No symptom recurrence was noted at 2-year follow-up postoperatively.
Jeon et al reported on 2 cases of medial elbow pain in which MRI evaluation demonstrated an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle with edema-like signal changes on each elbow.16 One patient underwent surgery, during which the anconeus epitrochlearis was divided.
Gervasio and Zaccone reported presence of an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle with a prominent medial head of triceps in 5 out of 156 (3.2%) patients who underwent surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome.10 Treatment consisted of simple nerve decompression with resection of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and partial resection of the triceps muscle. All patients obtained complete recovery.
Boero et al reported on 1 pediatric case.3 Prior to surgery, the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle compressing the ulnar nerve was visualized on ultrasound. There was no subluxation of the ulnar nerve following excision of the muscle, and the patient improved.
In our series, half of the cases were treated with submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in addition to myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle, as this was the senior authors’ preferred technique for cubital tunnel syndrome prior to year 2010. The other 8 elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve for a distance of 8 cm proximal and distal to the medial epicondyle. The surgeons observed elbow flexion and extension intraoperatively to check for ulnar nerve subluxation. Since none of the 8 elbows demonstrated ulnar nerve subluxation following myotomy and in situ decompression, submuscular transposition was deemed unnecessary.
No significant difference was noted in terms of clinical improvement between elbows treated with myotomy and transposition versus elbows that received myotomy and in situ decompression only. All but 1 patient in the myotomy and in situ decompression only group had either complete relief from symptoms or improvement of symptoms.
The role of ulnar nerve transposition in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome has often been debated. A recent Cochrane Review meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials suggests no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcome in the treatment of ulnar neuropathy between in situ decompression of the nerve only and decompression with transposition, regardless of the finding of an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle.4 The analysis did find, however, that the rate of deep and superficial surgical site infections is higher when decompression with transposition is performed.
When observed intraoperatively, the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle changes its vector as the elbow is ranged from extension to flexion as well as during forearm pronation and supination. This change in vector may convert a relaxed anconeus epitrochlearis to become taut over the ulnar nerve (Figure 1). With severe compression, indentation of the ulnar nerve can occur at the site of the anconeus epitrochlearis. This supports the concept that the dynamic anatomy of the elbow may be contributing to the compression of the ulnar nerve, as described by Apfelberg and Larson.1 More commonly, however, we have noticed the muscle is relaxed throughout the full range of the elbow and is likely only an incidental finding (Figure 2). This can be tested by placing a hemostat deep to the muscle and over the nerve to gauge the severity of compression. Regardless of findings, we recommend myotomy of the anomalous muscle along with in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve as this alone should achieve relief.
Figure 1.
(a) With elbow extension, the anconeus epitrochlearis is relaxed. (b) At 45° of flexion, the vector of the muscle become oblique with increased tension of the muscle fibers. (c) With the elbow flexed, the vector of the muscle fibers becomes even more oblique resulting in compression of the ulnar nerve. (d) There is persistent indentation of the ulnar nerve (arrow) following myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis.
Figure 2.
(a) With elbow in extension, there is no tension on the hemostat within the cubital tunnel. (b) With elbow flexion, the vector of the muscle changes, but there is no tension on the hemostat or underlying nerve. Compression was present from Osborne’s ligament, and the anconeus epitrochlearis was an incidental finding.
Following myotomy and in situ decompression, the surgeon should observe the ulnar nerve as the elbow is brought into flexion and extension. The released ulnar nerve now may have a tendency to sublux and become vulnerable to recurrence of neuropathy. When presented with findings of subluxation, we perform submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Beth at the Medical Wordsmith for her assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Ethical Approval: This study was approved by our institutional review board.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights: This study was a retrospective chart review carried out with the approval of our institutional review board.
Statement of Informed Consent: All patients whose charts were reviewed for this study signed the standard informed consent forms prior to their surgical procedures, allowing data to be used for educational purposes. No recognizable images are included in the figures.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported entirely by the Department of Plastic Surgery. No funding was received from any outside source
References
- 1. Apfelberg DB, Larson SJ. Dynamic anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51:79-81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bando K. Die statistische anatomie bei den nordchinesen. Hirosaki Med. 1956;7:123-127. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Boero S, Sénès FM, Catena N. Pediatric cubital tunnel syndrome by anconeus epitrochlearis: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:e21-e23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, et al. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2:CD006839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Campbell WW, Pridgeon RM, Riaz G, et al. Variations in anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel: Pitfalls in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14:733-738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chalmers J. Unusual causes of peripheral nerve compression. Hand. 1978;10:168-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dahners LE, Wood FM. Anconeus epitrochlearis, a rare cause of cubital tunnel syndrome: a case report. J Hand Surg. 1984;9A:579-580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dellon AL. Musculotendinous variations about the medial humeral epicondyle. J Hand Surg Br. 1986;11:175-181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Galton JC. On the epitrochleo-anconeus or anconeus sextus (Gruber). J Anat Physiol. 1874;9:168-175. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gervasio O, Zaccone C. Surgical approach to ulnar nerve compression at the elbow caused by the epitrochleoanconeus muscle and a prominent medial head of the triceps. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(3)(suppl 1):186-192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gessini L, Jandolo B, Pietrangeli A, et al. Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow by persistent epitrochleoanconeus muscle. J Neurosurg. 1981;55:830-831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gruber W. [The anomalous course of the ulnar nerve in front of the medial epicondyle] [In German]. Arch Anat Physiol Wissen Med. 1867;560-564. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hirasawa Y, Sawamura H, Sakakida K. Entrapment neuropathy due to bilateral epitrochleoanconeus muscles: a case report. J Hand Surg Am. 1979;4:181-184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hsu RW, Chen CY, Shen WJ. Ulnar nerve palsy due to concomitant compression by the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and a ganglion cyst. Orthopedics. 2004;27:227-228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Husarik DB, Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, et al. Elbow nerves: MR findings in 60 asymptomatic subjects—normal anatomy, variants, and pitfalls. Radiology. 2009;252:148-156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jeon I, Fairbairn JK, Neumann L, et al. MR imaging of edematous anconeus epitrochlearis: another cause of medial elbow pain? Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:103-107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kurihara K, Hirakawa M, Kojima T. Cubital tunnel syndrome due to M. epitrochleo-anconeus (in Japanese). Seikeigeka. 1977;28:1395. [Google Scholar]
- 18. LeDouble AF. Traité des variations du système musculaire de l’homme et de leur signification au pointe de vue de l’anthropologie zoologiques. 2nd ed. Paris, France: Schleicher Freres; 1897. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Masear VR, Hill JJ, Cohen SM. Ulnar compression neuropathy secondary to the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle. J Hand Surg Am. 1988;13A:720-724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mumenthaler M. Die luxation de nervus ulnaris am ellembogen. Dtsch Z Nervenheilk. 1958;178:163-198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. O’Driscoll SW, Horii E, Carmichael SW, et al. The cubital tunnel and ulnar neuropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:613-617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. O’Hara JJ, Stone JH. Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow caused by a prominent medial head of the triceps and an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21:133-135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Okamoto M, Abe M, Shirai H, et al. Diagnostic ultrasonography of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25:499-502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Von Clemens HJ. Zur morphologie des ligamentum epitrochleo-anconeum. Anat Anz. 1957;104:343-344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Wachsmuth W, Wilhelm A. Der Musculus epitrochleoanconaeus und seine klinische bedeutung. Mschr Unfallheilk. 1968;71:1-22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


