Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 1998 Dec 7;11(3):132–139. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1997)11:3<132::AID-JCLA3>3.0.CO;2-C

Isolating RNA from clinical samples with catrimox‐14 and lithium chloride

Donald E Macfarlane 1,✉, Christopher E Dahle 1
PMCID: PMC6760685  PMID: 9138101

Abstract

RNA is a highly informative molecule that has great potential as a target for diagnostic studies. This potential can be reached only when reliable methods for isolating RNA are available in the clinical environment. Cationic surfactants lyse cells and precipitate nucleic acids. We have described a novel cationic surfactant (tetradecyltrimethylammonium oxalate, Catrimox‐14™), which is particularly effective in precipitating RNA from cells and which can be applied to clinical specimens. We examine the utility of a method of recovering RNA from the surfactant‐nucleic acid precipitate in which 2 M lithium chloride is used to extract the DNA and surfactant from the precipitate; RNA (being insoluble in lithium chloride solution) remains in the pellet.

The yield of RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells by the Catrimox‐LiCl method we describe was the same yield by a conventional method using guanidine thiocyanate, phenol, and chloroform (GPC). The quality of the RNA, judged by agarose gel electrophoresis, A260/280 ratio and its ability to serve as a target for reverse transcription and PCR, was the same. RNA was isolated and amplified from blood stored for at least 2 weeks in Catrimox solution at room temperature. RNA was also easily isolated with the Catrimox‐LiCl method in good yield from frozen sections of mouse liver, spleen, kidney and brain, and from core biopsies of liver and kidney. RNA isolated from needle aspirates of liver, spleen, kidney, pancreas, and brain was easily amplified by RT‐PCR. The Catrimox‐LiCl method is simple and does not call for the use of corrosive reagents. The Catrimox‐LiCl method removes 98% of the DNA.

We conclude that the Catrimox‐LiCl method is suitable for use in clinical applications of RNA‐based diagnosis. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 11:132–139, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: RNA isolation, cationic surfactant, diagnosis by PCR

References

  • 1. MacDonald RJ, Swift GH, Przybyla AE, Chirgwin JM: Isolation of RNA using Guanidinium Salts. Meth Enzymol 152: 219–227, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N: Single‐step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate‐phenol‐chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162: 156–159, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chomczynski PA, Sacchi N: Single‐step isolation from cultures cells and tissues In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Ausubel EM, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Smith JA, Seidman JG, Struhl K, eds. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chomczynski P: A reagent for the single step simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA, and proteins from cells and tissue samples. BioTechniques 15: 523–537, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Macfarlane DE, Dahle CE: Isolating RNA from whole blood: The dawn of RNA‐based diagnosis. Nature 362: 186–188, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Macfarlane DE, Dahle CE: Use of a novel cationic surfactant in the isolation of RNA. Biomed Products 18: 60–62, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dahle, CE , Macfarlane DE: Isolation of RNA from cells in culture using Catrimox‐14TM cationic surfactant. Biotechniques 15: 1102–1105, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Selden RF: Analysis of RNA by Northern hybridization In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Vol. Unit 4.9(Supplement 13). Ausubel FM, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Smith JA, Seidman JG, Struhl K, eds. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Macfarlane DE, Manzel L: Activation of beta‐isozyme of protein kinase (PKCβ) is necessary and sufficient for phorbol ester‐induced differentiation of HL‐60 promyelocytes: Studies with PKCβ defective PET‐mutant. J Biol Chem 269: 4327–4331, 1994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Too HP, Maggio JE: Simultaneous extraction of total RNA and peptides from tissues: applications to tachykinins. Peptides 16: 45–53, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fang ZA, Castro CE: Simple modification of the single‐step method of RNA isolation from rat liver. BioTechniques 10: 734–736, 1991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. De Andres B, del Pozo V, Gallardo S, de Arruda‐Chaves E, Cárbada B, Martín‐Orozco E, Posada M, Palomino P, Lahoz C: Improved method for mRNA extraction from parrafin‐embedded tissues. BioTechniques 18: 42–44, 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Diamond DA, Davis GL, Qian KP, Lau JY: Detection of hepatitis C viral sequences in formalin‐fixed, parrafin‐embedded liver tissue: Effect of interferon alpha therapy. Med Virol 42: 294–298, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Finke J, Fritzen R, Ternes P, Lange W, Dölken G: An improved strategy and a useful housekeeping gene for RNA analysis from formula‐fixed parrafin‐embedded tissues by PCR. BioTechniques 14: 448–453, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Stanta G, Schneider C: RNA extracted from paraffin‐embedded human tissues is amenable to analysis by PCR amplification. BioTechniques 11: 304–308, 1991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liedtke W, Battisitini L, Brosnan CF, Raine CS: A comparison of methods for RNA extraction from lymphocytes for RT‐PCR. PCR Methods Applic 4: 185–187, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wallace DM: Precipitation of nucleic acids. Meth Enzymol 152: 41–48, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bucana CD, Radinsky R, Dong X, Sanchez R, Brigati DJ, Fidler IJ: A rapid colorimetric in situ mRNA hybridization technique using hyperbiotinylated oligonucleotide probes for analysis of mdrl in mouse colon carcinoma cells. J Histochem Cytochem 41: 499–506, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hodges E, Howell WM, Tyacke SR, Wong R, Cawley MI, Smith JL: Detection of T‐cell receptor beta chain mRNA in frozen and paraffin embedded biopsy tissue using digoxigenin‐labelled oligonucleotide probes in situ. J Pathol 174: 151–158, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. El‐Batanouny MH, Savage K, Jacobs R, El‐Refaie AO, Squadrito GG, Brown D, Saleh SM, Raouf AA, Amer KM, Dusheiko GM et al: Hepatitis C virus‐polymerase chain reaction of routinely processed liver biopsies. J Med Virol 43: 380–385, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Marin MG, Cariani E, Salmi A, Rangoni G, Chiodera PL, Pizzicolo G, Albertini A: HCV‐RNA detection in ultrasound‐guided fine needle biopsies of liver nodules and surrounding tissue. J Virol Meth 48: 125–132, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Garbay B, Bove‐Grabot E, Garret M: Processed pseudogenes interfere with reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction controls. Anal Biochem 237: 157–159, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES