Abstract
The electrophysiological characteristics of unmodified, postnatal gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons in the female mouse were studied using whole-cell recordings and single-cell RT-PCR methodology. The GnRH neurons of adult animals fired action potentials and exhibited distinguishable voltage–current relationships in response to hyperpolarizing and depolarizing current injections. On the basis of their patterns of inward rectification, rebound depolarization, and ability to fire repetitively, GnRH neurons in intact adult females were categorized into four cell types (type I, 48%; type II, 36%; type III, 11%; type IV, 5%). The GnRH neurons of juvenile animals (15–22 d) exhibited passive membrane properties similar to those of adult GnRH neurons, although only type I (61%) and type II (7%) cells were encountered, in addition to a group of “silent-type” GnRH neurons (32%) that were unable to fire action potentials. A massive, action potential-independent tonic GABA input, signaling through the GABAA receptor, was present at all ages. Afterdepolarization and afterhyperpolarization potentials (AHPs) were observed after single action potentials in subpopulations of each GnRH neuron type. Tetrodotoxin (TTX)-independent calcium spikes, as well as AHPs, were encountered more frequently in juvenile GnRH neurons compared with adults. These observations demonstrate the existence of multiple layers of functional heterogeneity in the firing properties of GnRH neurons. Together with pharmacological experiments, these findings suggest that potassium and calcium channels are expressed in a differential manner within the GnRH phenotype. This heterogeneity occurs in a development-specific manner and may underlie the functional maturation and diversity of this unique neuronal phenotype.
Keywords: calcium channels, GnRH, LHRH, GABAA, receptor, patch-clamp electrophysiology, potassium channels, puberty
The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons are thought to represent a functionally discrete population of cells that control mammalian fertility by regulating the secretion of gonadotropic hormones from the pituitary gland. Despite their clear importance in the survival of mammalian species, relatively little is known about their molecular properties and even less information is available on their electrophysiological characteristics. This has resulted principally from the scattered distribution of the GnRH cell bodies within the basal forebrain, which has made their investigation in situ extremely difficult. Because these neurons secrete GnRH in a pulsatile manner (Levine et al., 1991), important questions exist about the basic membrane properties of these neurons, as well as the mechanisms of pulsatility and synchronicity within the GnRH neuronal network as a whole. It also remains unclear whether the GnRH population is indeed a functionally homogenous population, as is assumed for other neuroendocrine phenotypes.
Recent studies using GnRH promoter transgenics to target the GnRH phenotype in the mouse (Pape et al., 1999; Skynner et al., 1999a;Spergel et al., 1999; Simonian et al., 2000; Suter et al., 2000) have provided one avenue through which the molecular and electrical nature of GnRH neurons can be addressed in their native environment. In the course of our own studies on fluorescent GnRH neurons in transgenic mice, we found that this phenotype could, in fact, be recognized on a topographical and morphological basis in a relatively reliable manner. Thus, by combining visual identification with post hocsingle-cell RT-PCR characterization, we were able to demonstrate that approximately one-half of neurons selected on the basis of their location and morphology contained GnRH transcripts and therefore were GnRH neurons (Skynner et al., 1999b). Although somewhat more laborious, this approach does have the great benefit of avoiding any potential confounding effects of fluorescence and/or transgene expression in GnRH neurons.
In the present study, our goal was to provide a characterization of the basic membrane properties of native, unmodified GnRH neurons in the female mouse. The GnRH neurons transcend from what is believed to be a relatively quiescent state to one of episodic cyclical activity at puberty (Ojeda and Urbanski, 1994). Thus, we also compared the electrophysiological characteristics of juvenile and adult GnRH neurons to try and elucidate any fundamental electrophysiological differences that might underlie their functional maturation. On the basis of the responses of GnRH neurons to hyperpolarizing and depolarizing current injection, we have found that this neuronal phenotype does not exhibit a single electrophysiological profile but that, surprisingly, up to four different types can be identified. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the prevalence of the various cell types changes across the time of puberty, as may the levels of functional calcium channels. Such observations indicate that multiple levels of functional heterogeneity exist in a development-dependent manner within the GnRH phenotype of the mouse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of brain slices incorporating GnRH neurons. All female mice (CBA/CaxC57BL/6J) were bred and housed (lights on at 7:00 A.M. and off at 7:00 P.M.) at The Babraham Institute and treated in accordance with UK Home Office regulations under project 80/1005. Vaginal smears were taken on a daily basis to identify adult female mice at diestrous or estrous stages of the ovarian cycle. Between 9:00 and 11:00 A.M., juvenile (postnatal day 15–22) and adult (day 50–70) female mice were anesthetized with isoflurane-RM (Rhone Merieux, Harlow, UK) and decapitated, and their brains were rapidly removed and placed in ice-cold bicarbonate-buffered artificial CSF (ACSF) of the following composition (in mm): 118 NaCl, 3 KCl, 0.5 CaCl2, 6.0 MgCl2, 11d-glucose, 10 HEPES, and 25 NaHCO3 (pH 7.4 when bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2). Brains were blocked and glued with cyanoacrylate to the chilled stage of an Oxford Vibratome (General Scientific, Redhill, UK), and 150-μm-thick coronal slices containing the medial septum through to the preoptic area were prepared. The slices were then incubated at 30°C for 30 min in oxygenated recording ACSF (rACSF) consisting of (in mm): 118 NaCl, 3 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, 11d-glucose, 10 HEPES, and 25 NaHCO3, pH 7.3, and thereafter kept at room temperature (20–23°C) for at least 1 hr before recording.
Whole-cell recording of GnRH neurons. Slices were transferred to the recording chamber, held submerged, and continuously superfused with rACSF at a rate of 6 ml/min. The slices were viewed with an upright Axioskop FS microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with a 40× immersion objective (Achroplan 0.75W, Ph2, Zeiss), giving a total magnification of 640× and Normaski differential interference contrast optics. To aid visualization of neurons, a CCD camera (Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was mounted on the microscope and connected to a monochrome monitor (Panasonic). All recordings were made at room temperature (20–23°C). Patch pipettes were pulled from thin-walled borosilicate glass capillary tubing (1.5 mm outer diameter, Clark Electromedical, Reading, UK) on a Flaming/Brown puller (P-97; Sutter Instruments Co., Novato, CA). Pipette tips were coated with either Sylgard resin (Dow Corning 184) or a wax pen (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and fire-polished to a final resistance of 6–12 MΩ. The pipette solution was passed through a disposable 0.22 μm filter before use and contained (in mm): 140 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 4 MgATP, 0.1 Na2GTP, 10 EGTA, with pH adjusted to 7.3 with KOH. The reference electrode was a glass bridge containing 4% agar-saline, of which one end was placed in the recording chamber and the other end in a 3 m KCl-containing side chamber connected to ground, via an Ag/AgCl pellet.
Whole-cell recordings were performed as described previously (Hamill et al., 1981) using an Axoclamp-2B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) operating in bridge mode. Bridge balance was checked frequently because of changes in series resistance. Current and voltage were simultaneously generated and sampled on-line using a Digidata 1200 (Axon Instruments) interface connected to an IBM PC/AT clone. Signals were filtered (0.3–10 kHz, Bessel filter of Axoclamp-2B) before digitizing at a rate of 5 kHz. Acquisition and subsequent analysis of the acquired data were performed using the “pClamp6” suite of software (Axon Instruments). In addition, current and voltage signals were recorded simultaneously onto a chart recorder (Gould TA 240, Valley View, OH) and DAT recorder (DTR 1204, Biological Sciences, Claix, France). Traces and voltage–current curves were plotted using “Origin 5” computer software (MicroCal Software, Northampton, MA).
After recordings of up to 1 hr duration, the cytoplasmic contents of the recorded neuron were harvested under visual control, and single-cell RT-PCR was used to examine for the presence of GnRH transcripts as reported previously (Skynner et al., 1999b). Five juvenile GnRH neurons exhibiting a silent-type electrophysiological profile were also assessed for the presence of GFAP transcripts, again exactly as detailed previously (Skynner et al., 1999b). As controls, the contents of cells located outside the distribution of the GnRH neurons were harvested and processed for GnRH RT-PCR, as were the contents of electrodes placed in the slice but not used to harvest cellular contents (mock harvests).
Determination of membrane properties. Input resistance and membrane time constants of neurons were estimated from small (0.02–0.1 nA, 100 msec duration) hyperpolarizing steps from resting membrane potential. Passing brief (20–30 msec) duration current pulses through the recording electrode generated single action potentials. Parameters such as spike amplitude, spike threshold, spike overshoot, and duration were measured and given as mean ± SEM. Spike duration was measured as two-thirds of the amplitude from baseline to peak. Afterhyperpolarizing potentials were characterized as those found to occur immediately after depolarization. Statistical analysis was undertaken by ANOVA with post hoc two-tailed ttests.
All drugs and reagents were applied via the superfusing ACSF solution. Solutions were switched manually by means of a six-way tap, ensuring that the bath was completely exchanged with control solution between drug application (∼20 sec). Unless stated otherwise, all reagents were purchased from BDH/Sigma (Poole, UK). The drugs used were 4-aminopyridine (4-AP; Sigma), barium chloride (BaCl2; Sigma), bicuculline methobromide (Tocris, Bristol, UK), cadmium chloride (CdCl2; Sigma), tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA-Cl; Lancaster Synthesis), and tetrodotoxin (Alexis Corporation, San Diego, CA).
RESULTS
Identification of GnRH neurons
Using thin slices of the forebrain, neurons of ∼10 μm diameter that exhibited a bipolar-type morphology with a vertical orientation were identified within the medial septum and rostral preoptic area (Fig. 1A). Post-recording characterization with single-cell RT-PCR (Fig.1B) revealed the presence of GnRH amplicons in 82% (31/38) of morphologically identified neurons in juvenile animals compared with 63% (44/69) of similarly identified cells in the adult mouse. The visualization of putative GnRH neurons was greatly facilitated by the lack of extensive fiber tracts in the brain of juvenile mice. No GnRH transcripts were detected in the cell contents of neurons harvested from outside the medial septum and rostral preoptic area, or in “mock harvests.” The 213 bp amplicon product (Fig. 1B) resulting from RT-PCR has been shown previously to represent authentic murine GnRH-I cDNA (Skynner et al., 1999b). Although providing positive amplicons with hypothalamic cDNA, the GFAP primers failed to detect any GFAP transcripts in the five silent-type GnRH neurons recorded in juvenile mice. In our hands, the post-recording identification was found to be dependent on the length of our recording; long (>75 min) recordings invariably resulted in no transcripts being detected. We therefore established a recording window of ≤1 hr to ensure the detection of GnRH transcripts in recorded GnRH neurons.
General membrane properties and spontaneous activities of GnRH neurons
Using the whole-cell configuration, the resting and active membrane properties of juvenile and adult GnRH neurons were examined in bridge mode. Resting membrane potentials were determined immediately after the rupture of the cell membrane and juvenile GnRH neurons found to have a mean resting potential of −65.4 ± 1.5 mV (n = 31). Adult GnRH neurons displayed resting membrane potentials of a comparable range, with a mean value of −69.2 ± 1.1 mV (n = 44) (Table1). We also found that the input resistance, membrane time constant, spike threshold, and action potential characteristics of juvenile and adult GnRH neurons were not significantly different (Table 1).
Table 1.
Juvenile mice (n= 31) | Adult female mice | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All adult mice (n= 44) | Estrous mice (n = 17) | Diestrous mice (n = 27) | ||
Resting membrane potential (mV) | −65.4 ± 1.5 | −69.2 ± 1.1 | −68.6 ± 2.1 | −69.1 ± 1.2 |
(−47 to −85) | (−52 to −85) | |||
Input resistance (GΩ) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
(0.03–2.8) | (0.36–3.18) | |||
Membrane time constant (msec) | 39.0 ± 4.4 | 44.8 ± 3.5 | 45.5 ± 4.1 | 43.5 ± 5.0 |
(3.0–91.1) | (12.1–110.3) | |||
Threshold potential of spike (mV) | −39.7 ± 1.7 | −33.9 ± 2.9 | −36.0 ± 0.7 | −38.5 ± 1.6 |
(−25.5 to −50.3) | (−27.7 to −51.8) | |||
Amplitude of spike (mV) | 83.1 ± 2.8 | 84.2 ± 1.8 | 85.2 ± 3.2 | 83.6 ± 2.1 |
(54.0–101.3) | (67.4–121.3) | |||
Overshoot of spike (mV) | 18.5 ± 2.0 | 15.4 ± 2.2 | 18.3 ± 4.2 | 13.5 ± 2.4 |
(−2.1 to 33.9) | (−4.5 to 49.5) | |||
Duration of spike (msec) | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1* |
(1.2–2.8) | (0.8–3.4) |
The numbers of GnRH neurons analyzed are given in parentheses. Adult GnRH neurons are further divided to show their properties in estrous and diestrous mice. A significant (*p < 0.05) difference in the duration of their action potential values was detected. Values are mean ± SEM, whereas ranges of values obtained are shown in parentheses.
In total, 27 of the adult GnRH neurons were from diestrous mice, and 17 were from estrous animals. With the single exception of action potential duration, which was significantly greater in diestrous mice (p < 0.05), no differences were detected in the intrinsic membrane properties of adult GnRH neurons at these stages of the estrous cycle (Table 1).
Approximately 80% of adult (34/44; 77%) and 60% of juvenile (18/31; 58%) GnRH neurons were found to be spontaneously active under symmetrical chloride ion recording conditions (Fig.2), with firing rates ranging from 0.02 to 6.5 Hz (adult, 0.9 ± 0.4 Hz; juvenile, 0.4 ± 0.1 Hz). The addition of TTX (0.5 μm) to the bathing medium revealed that the great majority of this activity was action potential independent and thus spontaneous in nature (Fig. 2). Further addition of bicuculline (10 μm) almost completely abolished these spontaneous events (Fig. 2) in both adult (n = 6) and juvenile (n = 5) GnRH neurons. Indeed, bath application of bicuculline alone (without preapplication of TTX) was able to abolish almost all spontaneous events (data not shown). The effects of TTX and bicuculline were reversible on washout (Fig. 2), whereas complete recovery from compounds was dependent on the period of their exposure to the slices.
Electrophysiological characteristics of adult GnRH neurons
The families of electrotonic potentials evoked in individual adult GnRH neurons in response to short (20–30 msec duration) and long (200 msec) duration intracellular current pulses were found to be heterogeneous (Fig. 3). The most striking difference was observed in response to 200 msec hyperpolarizing current pulses where four main profiles (types I–IV) were consistently observed (Fig. 3; Table2). The most abundant GnRH neurons (type I, 48%) exhibited a linear-type voltage relationship in response to hyperpolarizing current pulses (Fig. 3A), whereas in type II cells (36%) this linear relationship was not maintained with larger hyperpolarization and resulted in “runaway” of the voltage transient and the generation of negative-going spike (Fig.3B). In the other two populations of adult GnRH neurons, negative current pulses evoked inward rectifying conductances with properties of either the anomolous rectifier (type III, 11%) (Fig.3C) or IQ/H (type IV, 5%) (Fig. 3D), with mixed permeability for sodium and potassium rectification (Halliwell and Adams, 1982; Rudy, 1988; Pape, 1996). Rebound depolarization was observed after the termination of the hyperpolarizing steps in all cell types, except for type II (Fig.3B), where it was never detected. The final distinguishing feature of the four cell types was observed in their response to 200 msec depolarizing current pulses where trains of fast action potentials, varying in their frequency of firing, were observed in cell types I, II, and IV, whereas cell type III displayed an initial fast action potential followed by trains of smaller and slower spikes (Fig.3C).
Table 2.
Adult female | Juvenile mice | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type I (D = 10) (E = 11) | Type II (D = 12) (E = 4) | Type III (D = 3) (E = 2) | Type IV (D = 2) (E = 0) | Type I (n = 19) | Type II (n = 2) | Silent (n = 10) | |
Resting membrane potential (mV) | −69.0 ± 1.6 | −68.3 ± 1.7 | −73.1 ± 3.5 | −63.6 | −65.4 ± 1.5 | −61.9 | −67.6 ± 3.4 |
Input resistance (GΩ) | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.6 ± 0.4 |
Time constant (τ) (msec) | 52.1 ± 5.2 | 38.3 ± 4.8 | 29.7 ± 6.6 | 35.8 | 39.0 ± 4.4 | 57.0 | 30.8 ± 9.7 |
Action potential threshold (mV) | −33.0 ± 4.4 | −38.7 ± 2.0 | −31.7 ± 2.7 | −44.0 | −39.7 ± 1.7 | −34.3 | |
Amplitude of action potential (mV) | 83.2 ± 2.6 | 84.8 ± 3.0 | 90.0 ± 5.0 | 78.5 | 83.1 ± 2.8 | 85.2 | |
Overshoot of action potential (mV) | 13.7 ± 3.2 | 16.0 ± 3.9 | 20.3 ± 7.0 | 15.1 | 18.5 ± 2.0 | 22.9 | |
Duration of action potential (msec) | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 2.1 | |
Spontaneously active | 76% | 75% | 100% | 50% | 89% | 50% | |
Percentage with ADP | 43% | 25% | 60% | 0% | 32% | 50% | |
Percentage with AHP | 5% | 6% | 0% | 50% | 37% | 50% |
Numbers (mean ± SEM) of neurons are given in parentheses. D, Diestrous; E, estrous.
The short duration stimulation evoked single action potentials that displayed afterspike depolarizing potentials (ADPs) of varying amplitude and duration as well as AHPs (Fig. 3). Delayed AHPs were not observed in any GnRH neurons. Although AHPs became more noticeable when cells were held at depolarized potentials of −55 mV (data not shown), the presence of ADPs and AHPs were found only in subpopulations of all four cell types at their resting membrane potential (Table 2). The resting membrane potential, input resistance, membrane time constant, and action potential threshold and characteristics were not different among any of the cell types (Table 2). Of the 17 GnRH neurons recorded from estrous mice, 65, 23, 12, and 0% were judged to be of types I, II, III, and IV, respectively, compared with the 37, 44, 11, and 8% categorization of GnRH neurons from diestrous mice (n = 27).
Electrophysiological characteristics of juvenile female mice
Recordings from the 31 juvenile GnRH neurons revealed that the majority (n = 19; 61%) exhibited firing properties similar to those of type I GnRH neurons in adult animals with a linear-type voltage response to hyperpolarizing current and rebound depolarization combined with sustained trains of fast action potentials to depolarizing current (Fig.4A). A small population of neurons (n = 2; 6%) displayed type II-like characteristics (data not shown). In terms of their intrinsic membrane properties, these juvenile GnRH neurons were not found to be different from the equivalent adult GnRH cell types (Table 2). Surprisingly, however, the rest of the juvenile GnRH neurons (n = 10; 32%) failed to fire action potentials, regardless of the amplitude of depolarizing current pulses (up to 0.5 nA), and were thus termed silent cells (Fig. 4B). These silent cell types displayed a range of rectification in response to hyperpolarizing current pulses as seen in types I–III (e.g., type II in Fig. 4B). Indeed, their intrinsic properties differed from firing cells only in their mean input resistance, which was very much lower at 0.60 ± 0.4 GΩ (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Current–voltage relationship plots of these neurons revealed strong outward and inward rectification (Fig. 4B).
Although the percentage of juvenile GnRH neurons (33%) that displayed ADPs was similar to that of adults (36%), many more juvenile GnRH neurons (38%) were found to exhibit AHPs (Fig. 4A) compared with adult GnRH cells (7%) (Table 2).
Effects of ion channel blockers on the excitability of GnRH neurons
TTX
Adult GnRH neurons were found to fire Na+-dependent action potentials, because 0.5 μm TTX abolished evoked action potentials in all cells tested (n = 40) (Fig.5A). In response to incremental increases in depolarizing current pulses in the presence of TTX, a strong outward rectification was observed with the concomitant unmasking of a hyperpolarization “notch” at the beginning of the voltage trace (Fig. 5A). This likely represents the presence of the A-type potassium conductance (IA) (Rudy, 1988). The corresponding current–voltage relationship measured at the end of the 200 msec current pulses showed that TTX had no effect on conductances evoked in the hyperpolarizing direction but had a marked rectification in the depolarizing direction, as revealed by the flat region positive to −50 mV (Fig. 5A). The rebound depolarization spikes after large hyperpolarizing current pulses were also abolished, or occasionally attenuated, by TTX (Fig. 5A).
The application of TTX to juvenile GnRH neurons also abolished fast action potentials and revealed the presence of a strong outward rectification (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, this hyperpolarization notch could often be seen in juvenile GnRH neurons even without TTX (n = 15) (Fig. 5B). In many juvenile GnRH neurons (47%), the application of TTX also revealed the presence of repetitive Ca2+ spikes (Fig.5Ba), which subsequently resulted in an increase in the amplitude of the AHP conductance (Fig. 5Bb). Similar TTX-independent spikes were only observed in 15% of adult GnRH neurons (data not shown).
Tetraethylammonium
In several experiments, the effects of outward current blockers on GnRH neurons were examined (Fig. 6). In both juvenile (n = 2) and adult (n = 3) GnRH neurons, 1 mm TEA was found to prolong the duration of the action potential and decrease cell excitability (Fig.6A). No effect of TEA was observed on the resting membrane potential or on the amplitude of responses evoked with negative current pulses. However, in two silent-type GnRH neurons, TEA depolarized the membrane potential by 2 mV and also increased the amplitude of electrotonic potentials evoked with depolarizing current pulses. However, TEA had no effect in the hyperpolarizing direction on these cells (data not shown). Although TEA blocks a wide range of potassium conductances, the delaying of the repolarization phase in association with a decrease in cell excitability observed here would be most compatible with the blocking of a delayed rectifier (IK) or large current (BK) calcium-activated potassium channel (Rudy, 1988).
4-Aminopyridine
The application of 100 μm 4-AP was found to increase adult GnRH neuron excitability (n = 2) (Fig.6B). This increase in excitability resulted from a decrease in spike latency and was observed as an increase in the frequency of spontaneous synaptic activities as well as evoked firing rates (Fig. 6B). This effect would be compatible with the blocking of an IA conductance (Rudy, 1988). The addition of 4-AP (100 μm) to two silent-type GnRH neurons was found to increase the amplitude of the electrotonic potentials evoked with depolarizing current pulses.
Barium
In four adult GnRH neurons, Ba2+applied at 100 μm was found to increase cell excitability but either had no effect on membrane potential (n = 3) or evoked a small 7 mV increase (n = 1). The block produced by Ba2+ on the amplitude of electrotonic potentials evoked with hyperpolarizing currents was uniform but also observed in the depolarizing direction, blocking outward rectifiers (data not shown). Of all the potassium channel blockers examined, Ba2+ produced the most dramatic effects on the silent-type GnRH neurons found in juvenile animals; addition of BaCl2 (100 μm) produced membrane depolarization (ranging from 21–44 mV; n = 3) concomitant with increases in resistance in both depolarizing and hyperpolarizing directions (Fig.7). The effects of Ba2+ were readily reversed on washout (Fig. 7).
Cesium
Addition of the potassium channel blocker CsCl at 100 μm had little to no effect on theI–V relationship in type I neurons (n = 2; data not shown). However, cesium (Cs+) produced a variable increase in the amplitude of the electrotonic potentials evoked with hyperpolarizing current pulses in types II, III, and IV GnRH neurons (n= 5) (Fig. 8). Indeed, it is well documented that the different inward rectifiers differ in their sensitivity to Cs+, and in the case of type III GnRH neurons (Fig. 8A), where it had the most pronounced effect, it was both voltage and concentration dependent. The effect produced at 100 μmconcentration was effective only on more negative jumps but became more uniform at 300 μm concentration (Fig. 7). Cs+ had little effect on the excitability of GnRH neurons and was reversible on washout.
DISCUSSION
Most GnRH neurons in mammalian species exhibit a bipolar-type morphology with a distinct vertical orientation (Silverman et al., 1994). As before (Skynner et al., 1999b), we show that many of the neurons displaying these characteristics contain GnRH transcripts and therefore are GnRH neurons. The specificity of this procedure is further indicated by the absence of GnRH amplicons in both mock harvests and cells located outside the GnRH distribution. It is important to recognize, however, that GnRH neurons which do not display a clear bipolar morphology will not be sampled in our procedure. Thus, although our results should be representative of the majority of GnRH neurons, they may not necessarily reflect the entire population. Notwithstanding these caveats, the present procedure has provided the means for the first detailed electrophysiological analysis of native mammalian GnRH neurons while avoiding any potential confounding effects that may arise from the investigation of transgenically modified, fluorescent GnRH neurons.
Heterogeneity within the adult GnRH neuronal population
Immunocytochemical and in situ hybridization studies have reported heterogeneity in GnRH neuron morphology (Wray and Hoffman, 1986) as well as their expression of specific receptors, immediate early genes, and neuropeptides, including GnRH itself (Hiatt et al., 1992; Merchenthaler et al., 1993; Porkka-Heiskanen et al., 1994; Wang et al., 1995; Gore et al., 1996; Simonian et al., 2000). We now provide direct evidence for functional heterogeneity in the basic membrane properties of these neurons. Most strikingly, the types III and IV GnRH neurons were found to display strong inward rectification to hyperpolarizing current pulses that were indicative of the presence of IIR andIQ/H, respectively. Experiments with Cs+ provided further support forIIR-type potassium channels in type III GnRH neurons, as well as their less prominent existence in types II and IV cells. In contrast, type I GnRH neurons did not exhibit any inward rectification. Further distinguishing characteristics of the different cell types were the inability of type III GnRH neurons to fire repetitively in response to a depolarizing current and the absence of rebound depolarization in type II cells. This latter phenomenon suggests the likelihood of lower levels of functional T-type Ca2+ channels (Huguenard, 1996) in type II GnRH neurons compared with the others.
We were also able to demonstrate the presence of theIA potassium conductance in GnRH neurons, although no particular relationship with the different cell types was found. In a similar manner, the ADP and AHP conductances were also found to exist in all four of the GnRH cell types but, interestingly, only in subpopulations of each. Calcium entry through N-type Ca2+ channels has been proposed to underlie the AHP, whereas entry through P/Q- and T-type Ca2+ channels is thought to be responsible for generation of ADP (Kobayashi et al., 1993; Sim and Allen, 1998). Together, these observations in native GnRH neurons indicate the existence of multiple layers of functional heterogeneity within the GnRH phenotype. At one level, there appears to be diversity in the levels of expression of different Ca2+ channels, although at another, this involves differential expression of channels underlying theIIR andIQ/H conductances.
Previous electrophysiological studies have demonstrated the presence ofIK,IA, andIIR, as well as low- and high-threshold-activated calcium conductances, in immortalized GT1 cells (Bosma, 1993; Hales et al., 1994; Van Goor et al., 1999a,b) and cultured embryonic GnRH neurons of the mouse (Kusano et al., 1995). Although detailed information on the basic membrane properties of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing GnRH neurons is not yet available, it is interesting to note that outward potassium currents indicative ofIA andIK conductances were reported bySpergel and colleagues (1999). However, our observation of fast AHPs in only a minority of GnRH neurons is at odds with its presence in all GFP-GnRH cells (Spergel et al., 1999). The reasons underlying this difference are not clear, but it is worth noting that the GFP-GnRH neurons had much lower resting membrane potentials (−55 ± 4 mV), and this would likely enable greater calcium entry on depolarization and facilitate the AHP conductance. Also, the GFP-GnRH neurons analyzed were obtained from a range of 1- to 24-week-old male and female mice. It is important to note, however, that GnRH neurons in the ovariectomized guinea pig (Lagrange et al., 1995) also expressIA- andIIR-type potassium currents and, interestingly, appear similar to the GnRH type IV neuron reported here.
The functional significance of different levels of multiple potassium and calcium ion channels in native GnRH neurons is not yet clear. However, the IA,IK, and AHP conductances have all been shown to play important roles in determining the repetitive firing patterns of neurons and are selectively modulated by neurotransmitter input (Rudy, 1988; Schwindt et al., 1988; Storm, 1990; Schoppa and Westbrook, 1999). The expression of these channels may well be critical in determining the specific patterned activities that control neurosecretory output from GnRH neurons. It is also of interest to note that a pacemaker role has been attributed toIH (Kelly and Ronnekleiv, 1994; Pape, 1996), and its presence in a small population of GnRH neurons may be significant in the generation of synchronized release of GnRH. Furthermore, the presence of rebound depolarization in cell types I, II, and IV would result in any coordinated inhibitory input generating synchronized firing (Huguenard, 1996; Bean and McDonough, 1998) in the GnRH neurons of this type.
Postnatal changes in GnRH neurons across puberty
Because the profile of GnRH secretion is believed to change substantially after puberty (Ojeda and Urbanski, 1994), it was surprising to find relatively little difference between the basic membrane properties of juvenile and adult female GnRH neurons. Neurons recorded from both age groups were spontaneously active and this was shown to result almost exclusively from a substantial GABAergic barrage signaling through the GABAA receptor. This receptor has also been identified in mouse GFP-GnRH and guinea pig GnRH neurons (Lagrange et al., 1995; Spergel et al., 1999). Much of this GABA release is action potential independent and likely represents the tonic activation of extrasynaptic α5βxγ2-type GABAA receptors on GnRH neurons (Brickley et al., 1996; Sim et al., 2000).
One striking difference, however, was the presence of silent-type GnRH neurons in only the juvenile mice. Experiments revealed the presence of both inward and outward rectifiers in these cells but a complete inability to fire action potentials. Although glial cells express a range of potassium channels (Bordey and Sontheimer, 2000), we believe that these recordings are not from glial cells because they did not contain GFAP transcripts and, further, were encountered only in juvenile mice. Intriguingly, preliminary work indicates that the Gn11-immortalized GnRH neurons, obtained from the nasal placode, are similarly unable to fire action potentials (Maggi et al., 2000). However, the precise nature of these interesting GnRH-expressing cells remains unknown. One intriguing speculation, however, is that they may represent the forebears of the adult type III and type IV GnRH neurons, which could be of particular importance to synchronized GnRH activity.
Our data also suggest the possibility that Ca2+ conductances may play a more prominent role in the cellular excitability of GnRH neurons in juveniles compared with adults. The TTX-independent Ca2+ spikes (43%) and AHP conductances (38%) were observed more frequently in juvenile GnRH neurons compared with adult GnRH cells (11 and 7%, respectively). These slow spikes arise from the activation of T-type Ca2+channels (Bean and McDonough, 1998) and have also been identified in the embryonically immortalized GT1 cells (Van Goor et al., 1999b). Intriguingly, embryonic GnRH neurons also exhibit clear periodic oscillations in their intracellular calcium concentrations (Terasawa et al., 1999). Together, our present data suggest that either the expression of T- and N-type Ca2+ channels becomes progressively lower with postnatal development or other alterations in GnRH neurons make their functional presence less obvious.
Conclusions
We provide here the first detailed account of the basic membrane properties of postnatal GnRH neurons in the mouse and show that, like other neurons, they express various conductances that underlie membrane excitability. Unexpectedly, however, we have observed a marked degree of heterogeneity in the expression of functional potassium and calcium channels that play a role in determining the firing characteristics of GnRH neurons. Developmentally, the major differences between juvenile and adult GnRH neurons were those of reduced GnRH cell type heterogeneity and a more apparent role for specific calcium channels in juvenile GnRH neurons. Other neuroendocrine phenotypes such as the oxytocin and vasopressin neurons do not exhibit substantial heterogeneity in their membrane properties (Stern and Armstrong, 1995), whereas the tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic neurons exhibit only small degrees of variability (Loose et al., 1990). The apparent heterogeneity in levels of channel expression within the GnRH neuronal populations may well result from their scattered distribution and likely individual microenvironments. Precisely what impact this heterogeneity has on function is not yet clear, but the present results provide critical direct evidence for the hypothesis that the GnRH neurons develop into a functionally heterogeneous population likely involved in multiple neuronal networks.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. We thank Sandra Dye for assistance with the mice.
Correspondence should be addressed to Allan E. Herbison, Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK. E-mail: allan.herbison@bbsrc.ac.uk.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bean BP, McDonough SI. Two for T. Neuron. 1998;20:825–828. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80463-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bordey A, Sontheimer H. Ion channel expression by astrocytes in situ: comparison of different CNS regions. Glia. 2000;30:27–38. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1136(200003)30:1<27::aid-glia4>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bosma MM. Ionic channel properties and episodic activity in isolated immortalized gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons. J Membr Biol. 1993;136:85–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00241492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brickley SG, Cull-Candy SG, Farant M. Development of a tonic form of synaptic inhibtion in rat cerebellar granule cells resulting from persistent activation of GABAA receptors. J Physiol (Lond) 1996;497:753–759. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gore AC, Wu TJ, Rosenberg JJ, Roberts JL. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and NMDA receptor gene expression and co-localization change during puberty in female rats. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5281–5289. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-17-05281.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hales TG, Sanderson MJ, Charles AC. GABA has excitatory actions on GnRH secreting immortalized hypothalamic (GT1–7) neurons. Neuroendocrinology. 1994;59:297–308. doi: 10.1159/000126671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Halliwell JV, Adams PR. Voltage-clamp analysis of muscarinic excitability in hippocampal neurons. Brain Res. 1982;250:71–92. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90954-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FT. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high resolution current recording from cell and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch. 1981;391:85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hiatt ES, Brunetta PG, Seiler GR, King JC. Subgroups of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone perikarya defined by computer analyses in the basal forebrain of intact female rats. Endocrinology. 1992;130:1030–1043. doi: 10.1210/endo.130.2.1733705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huguenard JK. Low-threshold calcium currents in central nervous system neurons. Annu Rev Physiol. 1996;58:329–368. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.001553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kelly MJ, Ronnekleiv OK. Electrophysiological analysis of neuroendocrine neuronal activity in hypothalamic slices. Methods Neurosci. 1994;20:47–67. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kobayashi M, Inoue T, Matsuo R, Masuda Y, Hidaka O, Kang Y, Morimoto T. Role of calcium conductances on spike afterpotentials in rat trigeminal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1993;77:3273–3283. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.3273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kusano K, Fueshko S, Gainer H, Wray S. Electrical and synaptic properties of embryonic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons in explant cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:3918–3922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lagrange AH, Ronnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Estradiol-17β and μ-opioid peptides rapidly hyperpolarize GnRH neurons: a cellular mechanism of negative feedback? Endocrinology. 1995;136:2341–2344. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.5.7720682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Levine JE, Bauer-Dantoin AC, Besecke LM, Conaghan LA, Legan SJ, Meredith JM, Strobl FJ, Urban JH, Vogelsong KM, Wolfe AM. Neuroendocrine regulation of luteinizing hormone pulse generator in the rat. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1991;47:97–153. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-571147-0.50008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Loose MD, Ronnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Membrane properties and response to opioids of identified dopamine neurons in the guinea pig hypothalamus. J Neurosci. 1990;10:3627–3634. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-11-03627.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maggi R, Pimpinelli F, Molteni L, Rosati B, Wanke E, Martini L. The migratory activity “in vitro” of immortalized hypothalamic LHRH neurons correlates with their maturational stage and electrical activity. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12[Suppl 11]:258. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Merchenthaler I, Lennard DE, Lopez FJ, Negro-Vilar A. Neonatal imprinting predetermines the sexually dimorphic, estrogen-dependent expression of galanin in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10479–10483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ojeda SR, Urbanski HF. Puberty in the rat. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. The physiology of reproduction. Raven; New York: 1994. pp. 363–407. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pape H-C. Queer current and pacemaker: the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in neurons. Annu Rev Physiol. 1996;58:299–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.001503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pape J-R, Skynner MJ, Allen ND, Herbison AE. Transgenics identifying distal 5′- and 3′-sequences specifying gonadotropin-releasing hormone expression in adult mice. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13:2203–2211. doi: 10.1210/mend.13.12.0380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Porkka-Heiskanen T, Urban JH, Turek FW, Levine JE. Gene expression in a subpopulation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) neurons prior to the preovulatory gonadotropin surge. J Neurosci. 1994;14:5548–5558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05548.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rudy B. Diversity and ubiquity of K channels. Neuroscience. 1988;25:729–749. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(88)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schoppa NE, Westbrook GL. Regulation of synaptic timing in the olfactory bulb by an A-type potassium current. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:1106–1113. doi: 10.1038/16033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schwindt PC, Spain WT, Foehring RC, Stafstrom CE, Chubb MC, Crill WE. Multiple potassium conductance and their functions in neurons from cat sensorimotor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1988;59:424–449. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.59.2.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Silverman A, Livne I, Witkin JW. The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), neuronal systems: immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. The physiology of reproduction. Raven; New York: 1994. pp. 1683–1706. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sim JA, Allen TJG. Morphological and membrane properties of rat magnocellular basal forebrain neurons maintained in culture. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:1653–1669. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.4.1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sim JA, Skynner MJ, Pape JR, Herbison AE. Late postnatal reorganization of GABAA receptor signalling in native GnRH neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:3497–3504. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Simonian SX, Skynner MJ, Sieghart W, Essrich C, Luscher B, Herbison AE. Role of GABAA receptor γ2 subunit in the development of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons in vivo. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:3488–3496. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Skynner MJ, Slater R, Sim JA, Allen ND, Herbison AE. Promoter transgenics reveal multiple gonadotropin-releasing hormone-I-expressing cell populations of different embryological origin in mouse brain. J Neurosci. 1999a;19:5955–5966. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05955.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Skynner MJ, Sim JA, Herbison AE. Detection of estrogen receptor alpha and beta messenger ribonucleic acids in adult gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Endocrinology. 1999b;40:5195–5201. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.11.7146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Spergel DJ, Kruth U, Hanley DF, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH. GABA- and glutamate-activated channels in green fluorescent protein-tagged gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons in transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 1999;19:2037–2050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-06-02037.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stern JE, Armstrong WE. Electrophysiological differences between oxytocin and vasopressin neurons in female rats in vitro. J Physiol (Lond) 1995;16:4861–4871. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp021001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Storm JF. Potassium currents in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Prog Brain Res. 1990;83:161–187. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61248-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Suter KJ, Song WJ, Sampson TL, Wuarin JP, Saunders JT, Dudek FE, Moenter SM. Genetic targeting of green fluorescent protein to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons: characterization of whole-cell electrophysiological properties and morphology. Endocrinology. 2000;141:412–419. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.1.7279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Terasawa E, Schanhofer WK, Keen KL, Luchansky L. Intracellular Ca2+ oscillations in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons derived from the embryonic olfactory placode of the rhesus monkey. J Neurosci. 1999;19:5898–5909. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05898.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Van Goor F, Krsmanovic LZ, Catt KJ, Stojilkovic SS. Coordinate regulation of gonadtropin-releasing hormone neuronal firing patterns by cytosolic calcium and store depletion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999a;96:4101–4106. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.4101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Van Goor F, Krsmanovic LZ, Catt KJ, Stojilkovic SS. Control of action potential-driven calcium influx in GT1 neurons by the activation status of sodium and calcium channels. Mol Endocrinol. 1999b;13:587–603. doi: 10.1210/mend.13.4.0261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang H, Hoffman GE, Smith MS. Increased GnRH mRNA in the GnRH neurons expressing cFos during the proestrous LH surge. Endocrinology. 1995;136:3673–3676. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.8.7628409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wray S, Hoffman G. Postnatal morphological changes in rat LHRH neurons correlated with sexual maturation. Neuroendocrinology. 1986;43:93–97. doi: 10.1159/000124516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]