Minor differences in the previously obtained genome of Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 were detected after resequencing the strain. Based on this, the genome size slightly increased. Additionally, we performed a manual annotation of genes involved in biocontrol and insect pathogenicity. This annotation version will be the basis for upcoming genome studies.
ABSTRACT
Minor differences in the previously obtained genome of Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 were detected after resequencing the strain. Based on this, the genome size slightly increased. Additionally, we performed a manual annotation of genes involved in biocontrol and insect pathogenicity. This annotation version will be the basis for upcoming genome studies.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 has a long history as a biocontrol agent. Many features and the regulation thereof have been described for this strain that are involved in the process of biocontrol against fungal and oomycete plant pathogens (1–3). Additionally, the organism has been recognized as an effective insect pathogen that can kill larvae of different plant pest insects after oral infection by the bacterium (4, 5). In addition, several features contributing to insect pathogenicity were described already (2, 4, 6). While the genome sequence of this strain was published a few years ago (7), the pathogen control and insect pathogenicity determinants were only poorly included.
We have resequenced the genome of P. protegens CHA0 starting with genomic DNA from its accession number CCOS 2 at the Culture Collection of Switzerland (CCOS). The strain was grown in LB broth at 28°C for 1 day. Total DNA was extracted from the pure culture using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genomic library preparation and genome sequencing were outsourced to GATC Biotech, AG (Constance, Germany). Libraries were prepared using a SPRIworks fragment library system I (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The TruSeq paired-end (PE) cluster kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumina, San Diego, CA) was used for cluster generation. Sequencing was performed on a HiSeq 2000 Illumina sequencer with 2 × 50-bp paired-end reads using the TruSeq SBS kit v3-HS (Illumina). A total of 97,357,690 quality-filtered reads were obtained from GATC, giving an approximate coverage of 700×. For de novo assembly using SeqMan NGen v12.2 (DNAStar, Madison, WI) with standard settings, only 8,500,000 reads (55× coverage) were used. Repeated cycles of read mapping with the SeqMan NGen software and inspection in different subroutines of the Lasergene package (DNAStar) yielded a complete genome of 6,868,156 bp with a G+C content of 63.39%. Based on a small region close to an rRNA region, the genome was 176 bp larger than the previous version (7). Additionally, few indels mainly in homopolymer regions were observed.
Annotation of the genome sequence was done in GenDB (8), with manual improvements. Comparative genomics was done in EDGAR v2.3 (9) using the parameters defined by Smits et al. (10). A comparison of the annotations indicated a difference between the two genome sequences. The two genomes share 5,995 genes, whereas 142 and 120 singletons were observed for our version, respectively, to the previous one, with the majority representing hypothetical proteins. Furthermore, manual annotation of all known biocontrol features and insect pathogenicity factors was performed. This version of the genome is now suited for use in comparative genomics studies to study different aspects of biocontrol and insect pathogenicity.
Data availability.
The genome sequence of P. protegens CHA0 (CCOS 2) was deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the BioProject number PRJEB28440 and accession number LS999205. The version described in this paper is version LS999205.1. Raw sequence reads (Illumina) have been deposited at the EMBL under accession number ERR3047520.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by the Department of Life Sciences and Facility Management of the Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW) in Wädenswil, Switzerland, and by grant 31003A-159520 from the Swiss National Foundation for Scientific Research.
REFERENCES
- 1.Haas D, Défago G. 2005. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonds. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:307–319. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flury P, Aellen N, Ruffner B, Péchy-Tarr M, Fataar S, Metla Z, Dominguez-Ferreras A, Bloemberg G, Frey J, Goesmann A, Raaijmakers JM, Duffy B, Höfte M, Blom J, Smits THM, Keel C, Maurhofer M. 2016. Insect pathogenicity in plant-beneficial pseudomonads: phylogenetic distribution and comparative genomics. ISME J 10:2527–2542. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kupferschmied P, Maurhofer M, Keel C. 2013. Promise for plant pest control: root-associated pseudomonads with insecticidal activities. Front Plant Sci 4:287. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Péchy-Tarr M, Bruck DJ, Maurhofer M, Fischer E, Vogne C, Henkels MD, Donahue KM, Grunder J, Loper JE, Keel C. 2008. Molecular analysis of a novel gene cluster encoding an insect toxin in plant-associated strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Environ Microbiol 10:2368–2386. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ruffner B, Péchy-Tarr M, Ryffel F, Hoegger P, Obrist C, Rindlisbacher A, Keel C, Maurhofer M. 2013. Oral insecticidal activity of plant-associated pseudomonads. Environ Microbiol 15:751–763. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kupferschmied P, Péchy-Tarr M, Imperiali N, Maurhofer M, Keel C. 2014. Domain shuffling in a sensor protein contributed to the evolution of insect pathogenicity in plant-beneficial Pseudomonas protegens. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003964. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jousset A, Schuldes J, Keel C, Maurhofer M, Daniel R, Scheu S, Thuermer A. 2014. Full-genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas protegens CHA0. Genome Announc 2:e00322-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00322-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meyer F, Goesmann A, McHardy AC, Bartels D, Bekel T, Clausen J, Kalinowski J, Linke B, Rupp O, Giegerich R, Pühler A. 2003. GenDB–an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 31:2187–2195. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blom J, Kreis J, Spänig S, Juhre T, Bertelli C, Ernst C, Goesmann A. 2016. EDGAR 2.0: an enhanced software platform for comparative gene content analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W22–W28. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smits THM, Rezzonico F, Kamber T, Blom J, Goesmann A, Frey JE, Duffy B. 2010. Complete genome sequence of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora CFBP 1430 and comparison to other Erwinia spp. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23:384–393. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-4-0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequence of P. protegens CHA0 (CCOS 2) was deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the BioProject number PRJEB28440 and accession number LS999205. The version described in this paper is version LS999205.1. Raw sequence reads (Illumina) have been deposited at the EMBL under accession number ERR3047520.
