Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Sep 26;8(39):e01031-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01031-19

Complete Genome Sequence of Xanthomonas Phage Pagan

Marielle Russo a, Tram Le a, Russell Moreland a, Carlos F Gonzalez a, Mei Liu a, Jolene Ramsey a,
Editor: Simon Rouxb
PMCID: PMC6763654  PMID: 31558639

The T7-like podophage Pagan infects Xanthomonas sp. strain ATCC PTA-13101, which was isolated from rice. The 44-kbp Pagan genome contains direct terminal repeats and contains 59 genes, 27 of which have a predicted function. Pagan is most closely related to Xanthomonas phage phi Xc10 and Xylella phage Prado.

ABSTRACT

The T7-like podophage Pagan infects Xanthomonas sp. strain ATCC PTA-13101, which was isolated from rice. The 44-kbp Pagan genome contains direct terminal repeats and contains 59 genes, 27 of which have a predicted function. Pagan is most closely related to Xanthomonas phage phi Xc10 and Xylella phage Prado.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Xanthomonas consists of many diverse species of Gram-negative, rod-shaped phytopathogenic gammaproteobacteria (1). Members of the genus Xanthomonas are ubiquitous and cause a variety of diseases in many plants, including bacterial spot disease of tomatoes and peppers and bacterial leaf blight of rice (2, 3). The resulting diseased crop is unusable, which leads to economically important crop yield loss, which is as high as 50% in rice cultivation (2). Xanthomonas and Xylella are closely related genera, and Xylella fastidiosa causes Pierce’s disease of grapevines (4). Phage-based therapeutics utilizing isolated virulent Xylella phages have exhibited significant potential for treating Pierce’s disease (5).

Phage Pagan was isolated from filtered (pore size, 0.2 μm), mixed freshwater collected in Vidor, TX, and infects the rice-associated Xanthomonas sp. strain ATCC PTA-13101. The host was grown aerobically at 28°C in tryptone nutrient broth/agar (BD), and phages were propagated via the soft agar overlay method described previously (6, 7). Full genomic DNA was purified following the shotgun library preparation protocol described by Summer (8), prepared as Illumina TruSeq libraries with the Nano low-throughput kit, and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument with paired-end 250-bp reads using v2 500-cycle chemistry. The quality of the 28,419 total sequence reads from the index containing the phage genome was evaluated using FastQC (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Sequence reads were then trimmed using the FASTX-Toolkit v0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). The genome was assembled through SPAdes v3.5.0 (using default parameters) with a sequencing coverage of 6.3-fold (9). Next, the genome was closed by PCR amplification off the contig ends (forward primer, 5′-GGTAGGTGATGTGGCAGTC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GTGTTCAACGTAGGTGAGAAGG-3′) and subsequent Sanger sequencing. Genome annotation and bioinformatic analysis were conducted through software tools available in the Center for Phage Technology Galaxy and Web Apollo instances (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-pub/) (10, 11). Structural annotation of the genome was accomplished using Glimmer v3.0 and MetaGeneAnnotator v1.0 and with ARAGORN v2.36 for tRNAs (1214). Gene function was then predicted using default settings for conserved domain searches with InterProScan v5.33-72 and sequence similarity searches of the NCBI nonredundant or UniProtKB Swiss-Prot/TrEMBL databases with BLAST v2.2.31 at a 0.001 maximum expectation value (1517). Likely transmembrane domains were identified by TMHMM v2.0, and lipoboxes were identified by LipoP v1.0 (18, 19). Rho-independent termination sites were annotated with TransTermHP v2.09 (20). progressiveMauve v2.4.0 was used to calculate genome-wide DNA sequence similarity (21). Phage morphology was assessed by negatively staining samples with 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate and viewing through transmission electron microscopy at the Texas A&M Microscopy and Imaging Center (22).

The 44,448-bp podophage Pagan genome has a coding density of 96.95% and contains 59 predicted genes but no tRNAs. The genome of Pagan displayed a G+C content of 62.3%, near the host Xanthomonas genome average of 64% G+C content (4). The contig was reopened at the direct terminal repeat boundary predicted by PhageTerm and that is syntenic with T7-like phages (23). Pagan is most closely related to Xanthomonas phage phi Xc10 (GenBank accession number MF375456) and Xylella phage Prado (accession number KF626667), with 93.46% and 69.55% nucleotide sequence identity and 53 and 48 shared proteins, respectively (24). These similarities contributed to lysis gene identification, including that of a class II pinholin, signal-arrest-release (SAR) endolysin, and overlapping spanin genes.

Data availability.

The genome sequence and associated data for phage Pagan were deposited under GenBank accession number MK903278, BioProject accession number PRJNA222858, SRA accession number SRR8892144, and BioSample accession number SAMN11408680.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (award DBI-1565146) and the Citrus Research and Development Foundation (project C726) to C.F.G. Additional support came from the Center for Phage Technology (CPT), an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife, and from the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics at Texas A&M University.

We are grateful for the advice and support of the CPT staff.

This announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for BICH464 Bacteriophage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Vauterin L, Rademaker J, Swings J. 2000. Synopsis on the taxonomy of the genus Xanthomonas. Phytopathology 90:677–682. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.7.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee B-M, Park Y-J, Park D-S, Kang H-W, Kim J-G, Song E-S, Park I-C, Yoon U-H, Hahn J-H, Koo B-S, Lee G-B, Kim H, Park H-S, Yoon K-O, Kim J-H, Jung C-H, Koh N-H, Seo J-S, Go S-J. 2005. The genome sequence of Xanthomonas oryzae pathovar oryzae KACC10331, the bacterial blight pathogen of rice. Nucleic Acids Res 33:577–586. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thieme F, Koebnik R, Bekel T, Berger C, Boch J, Büttner D, Caldana C, Gaigalat L, Goesmann A, Kay S, Kirchner O, Lanz C, Linke B, McHardy AC, Meyer F, Mittenhuber G, Nies DH, Niesbach-Klösgen U, Patschkowski T, Rückert C, Rupp O, Schneiker S, Schuster SC, Vorhölter F-J, Weber E, Pühler A, Bonas U, Bartels D, Kaiser O. 2005. Insights into genome plasticity and pathogenicity of the plant pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria revealed by the complete genome sequence. J Bacteriol 187:7254–7266. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.21.7254-7266.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Monteiro-Vitorello CB, de Oliveira MC, Zerillo MM, Varani AM, Civerolo E, Van Sluys M-A. 2005. Xylella and Xanthomonas Mobil’omics. OMICS 9:146–159. doi: 10.1089/omi.2005.9.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Das M, Bhowmick TS, Ahern SJ, Young R, Gonzalez CF. 2015. Control of Pierce’s disease by phage. PLoS One 10:e0128902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gill JJ, Summer EJ, Russell WK, Cologna SM, Carlile TM, Fuller AC, Kitsopoulos K, Mebane LM, Parkinson BN, Sullivan D, Carmody LA, Gonzalez CF, LiPuma JJ, Young R. 2011. Genomes and characterization of phages Bcep22 and BcepIL02, founders of a novel phage type in Burkholderia cenocepacia. J Bacteriol 193:5300–5313. doi: 10.1128/JB.05287-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adams MH. 1956. Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, Inc, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Summer EJ. 2009. Preparation of a phage DNA fragment library for whole genome shotgun sequencing. Methods Mol Biol 502:27–46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-565-1_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W537–W544. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee E, Helt GA, Reese JT, Munoz-Torres MC, Childers CP, Buels RM, Stein L, Holmes IH, Elsik CG, Lewis SE. 2013. Web Apollo: a Web-based genomic annotation editing platform. Genome Biol 14:R93. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res 15:387–396. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong S-Y, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The UniProt Consortium. 2018. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46:2699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Krogh A, Larsson B, Heijne von G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Juncker AS, Willenbrock H, Heijne Von G, Brunak S, Nielsen H, Krogh A. 2003. Prediction of lipoprotein signal peptides in Gram-negative bacteria. Protein Sci 12:1652–1662. doi: 10.1110/ps.0303703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kingsford CL, Ayanbule K, Salzberg SL. 2007. Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake. Genome Biol 8:R22. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Valentine RC, Shapiro BM, Stadtman ER. 1968. Regulation of glutamine synthetase. XII. Electron microscopy of the enzyme from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 7:2143–2152. doi: 10.1021/bi00846a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier L-C, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ahern SJ, Das M, Bhowmick TS, Young R, Gonzalez CF. 2014. Characterization of novel virulent broad-host-range phages of Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas. J Bacteriol 196:459–471. doi: 10.1128/JB.01080-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence and associated data for phage Pagan were deposited under GenBank accession number MK903278, BioProject accession number PRJNA222858, SRA accession number SRR8892144, and BioSample accession number SAMN11408680.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES