In the original article, there was an error. The square root symbol is missing from our description of the results.
A correction has been made to the Results section, subsection Primary Finding, paragraph two:
“Let rij denote the beauty rating that the ith subject gives to the jth formula; let uij denote individual i's understanding of the jth formula; let N denote the total number of subjects; let and be the mean beauty rating (m-BR) and standard deviation of beauty ratings (sd-BR), given to the jth formula across subjects, respectively; let and be the mean understanding rating of the formula (m-UR) and standard deviation of the understanding rating (sd-UR), given to the jth formula across subjects, respectively.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
