Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 27.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Stroke. 2016 Sep 24;12(1):108–113. doi: 10.1177/1747493016669848

ASPREE-NEURO study protocol: A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of low-dose aspirin on cerebral microbleeds, white matter hyperintensities, cognition, and stroke in the healthy elderly

Stephanie A Ward 1,2,*, Parnesh Raniga 3,*, Nicholas J Ferris 3,4, Robyn L Woods 1, Elsdon Storey 1,5, Michael J Bailey 6, Amy Brodtmann 7, Paul A Yates 8, Geoffrey A Donnan 9, Ruth E Trevaks 1, Rory Wolfe 1, Gary F Egan 3, John J McNeil 1, ASPREE investigator group
PMCID: PMC6764436  NIHMSID: NIHMS1048109  PMID: 27634976

Abstract

Rationale:

Cerebral microbleeds seen on brain magnetic resonance imaging are markers of small vessel disease, linked to cognitive dysfunction and increased ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke risk. Observational studies suggest that aspirin use may induce cerebral microbleeds, and associated overt intracranial hemorrhage, but this has not been definitively resolved.

Aims:

ASPREE-NEURO will determine the effect of aspirin on cerebral microbleed development over three years in healthy adults aged 70 years and over, participating in the larger ‘ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE)’ primary prevention study of aspirin.

Sample size:

Five hundred and fifty-nine participants provide 75% power (two-sided p value of 0.05) to determine an average difference of 0.5 cerebral microbleed per person after three years.

Methods and design:

A multi-center, randomized placebo-controlled trial of 100 mg daily aspirin in participants who have brain magnetic resonance imaging at study entry, one and three years after randomization and who undergo cognitive testing at the same time points.

Study outcomes:

The primary outcome is the number of new cerebral microbleeds on magnetic resonance imaging after three years. Secondary outcomes are the number of new cerebral microbleeds after one year, change in volume of white matter hyperintensity, cognitive function, and stroke.

Discussion:

ASPREE-NEURO will resolve whether aspirin affects the presence and number of cerebral microbleeds, their relationship with cognitive performance, and indicate whether consideration of cerebral microbleeds alters the risk-benefit profile of aspirin in primary prevention for older people.

Trial registration:

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001313729.

Keywords: Cerebral microbleeds, small vessel disease, neuroimaging, aspirin, dementia, cognitive decline, healthy aging

Introduction and rationale

Cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) are major contributors to disability and dementia.1,2 CVD of small vessels (SVD) is associated with risks of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, cognitive decline, and dementia.2 Most SVD markers detected on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are presumed ischemic in origin, including white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and lacunes. However, SVD markers may also represent hemorrhagic pathologies, such as in cortical siderosis and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). CMBs are small, hypodense areas <10 mm in diameter, found on T2* gradient-recalled echo (GRE) or susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) MRI sequences,3 which are associated on histopathology with blood vessel breakdown and which contain blood products.4 CMBs are found in high prevalence in populations presenting with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and Alzheimer’s dementia,3 and have been associated with cognitive impairment.5 However, CMBs are also frequently observed in the general population and are strongly linked to aging, with large population-based imaging cohorts reporting prevalence of around 16% for those aged 60–70 years,6,7 and 30–35% in adults aged >80 years.6,7

CMBs in lobar and cortical regions have been associated with older age, amyloid deposition, and the APOE ε4 allele, suggesting underlying cerebral amyloid angiopathy, while CMBs in deeper structures are associated with hypertensive microangiopathy. Observational studies suggest CMBs may also be induced by aspirin exposure.810 Furthermore, the increased risk of ICH11 in the setting of CMBs may be compounded by antithrombotic medications, including aspirin.12,13 However, the effect of aspirin on CMB development has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial, and observational study data are limited by confounding due to indication. Aspirin may also prevent progression of other markers of SVD and associated cognitive decline,14 and has an established role in the secondary prevention of large-vessel CVD,15 which frequently co-exists with SVD, including CMB. Resolving in a randomized controlled study the impact of aspirin on CMB development, associated changes in cognition and risk of stroke is therefore of great importance.

Methods

Design

ASPREE-NEURO is a neuroimaging sub-study of the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE)16 trial. We will image a subset of 559 participants using 3 Tesla (3T) brain MRI, at baseline, one and three years to determine the impact of low-dose aspirin compared with placebo on MRI markers of SVD, in particular CMB and WMH. We will relate the impacts of aspirin on these markers to cognitive function, over three years. We will also relate the impacts of aspirin to stroke risk and cognitive impairment in exploratory analyses.

Patient population

Participants were recruited from the ASPREE trial, a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of daily 100 mg aspirin in 19,000 healthy community dwelling older adults in Australia and the USA. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for ASPREE have been published elsewhere.16 In brief, participants are eligible in Australia if aged 70 years and over, have no history of occlusive vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, cognitive impairment, or disability, are not currently taking antithrombotic therapy, and do not have anemia or a diagnosis likely to cause death within five years.

ASPREE participants enrolling at each Melbourne study center from December 2013 to December 2014 were offered the opportunity to volunteer for ASPREE-NEURO.

Additional exclusion criteria specific to ASPREE-NEURO included the presence of contraindications to MRI, such as certain foreign bodies and metallic or electronic implants not known to be safe at 3T, and claustrophobia.

Randomization

Block randomization was used for ASPREE and, along with procedures for concealment of allocation, is described in detail elsewhere.16

Intervention

The intervention is 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin or an identical placebo medication in a 1:1 ratio, dispensed after a four-week placebo run in and compliance check. Study medication is dispensed at baseline and thereafter annually.

Primary outcome

Number of CMBs on brain MRI at three years after randomization.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of CMBs on brain MRI at one year after randomization.

  2. Change in volume of white matter hyperintensity on MRI after one and three years.

  3. Cognitive function and cognitive decline after three years.

  4. Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.

Brain MRI (see Supplementary Material 1 for full MRI protocol)

All MRIs are performed on a 3T Skyra scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), located at the Monash Biomedical Imaging (MBI) facility, Blackburn Road, Clayton (Melbourne, Australia).

The MRI examination takes 38 min to complete and comprises standardized sequences used for analysis of brain morphometry, microstructure, and function including:

  1. T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) (gray and white matter morphometry, anatomical reference);

  2. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR; white matter abnormalities including WMH);

  3. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI; CMB, cortical siderosis, and venous vasculature);

  4. Diffusion-weighted imaging (white matter microstructure); Resting state Functional MRI (rs-fMRI)

  5. Multiple inversion arterial spin-labeling (ASL; cerebral blood flow); and

  6. A gradient-echo-based field map to enable distortion corrections.

Processing and interpretation of neuroimaging data are done blind to participant information and treatment allocation

CMB will be reported based on the microbleed anatomical scale (MARS)3 including numbers and sites of lesions.

A quantitative susceptibility map (QSM) will be generated from the SWI acquisition to help distinguish CMB from calcifications.17

Clinical notification.

All scans are reported by a neuroradiologist. Participants and their doctors are notified of incidental findings of clinical significance (see supplementary material 2).

Cognitive function testing

Cognitive function tests are performed in ASPREE at baseline, and 1, 3, and 5 years after randomization. These include:

  1. Modified mini-mental state examination (3MS). Participants are required to score >77/100 for entry into the ASPREE Trial;18

  2. Single-letter controlled oral word association test (COWAT);19

  3. Hopkins verbal learning test-revised;20

  4. Symbol digit modalities test.21

Two additional tests are used in the ASPREE-NEURO study, at baseline, one and three years:

  1. Stroop test (Victoria version)22

  2. The Color Trails test23

The test assessors undergo standard training and assessment, and are re-certified annually, or if the number of assessments conducted falls below three in a three-month period.

Cognitive decline occurs when the 3MS falls below 78 or there is an age-adjusted fall of 10 points or more on the 3MS, after adjustment for repeated long-interval administration, or when the combined averaged z score for any domain falls by >1 SD across the study period when compared with age/education-adjusted norms, and/or an adjudicated diagnosis of dementia occurs through the ASPREE study within three years from randomization (see ASPREE Clinical Protocol for details).24

Cerebrovascular events:

Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.

Fatal and non-fatal stroke are secondary end-points of the principal ASPREE trial, adjudicated by the ASPREE Stroke Endpoint Committee. Descriptions of relevant processes in the definition of these clinical strokes are available on the ASPREE study protocol.24

Data monitoring body

The ASPREE Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) oversees the study.24

Sample size

A target sample size of 606 subjects was calculated to detect an average difference in the number of CMBs per person between aspirin and placebo groups of 0.5 at 12 months (95% power) and 36 months (80% power). These calculations were based on standard deviations in CMBs of 1.5 and 2 at 12 and 36 months, respectively, and included a 20% inflation for non-normality, dropout, cross-over, and loss to follow-up.

Following final recruitment of 559 participants, this study now has 94% power to detect an average difference of 0.5 CMB per person between groups at 12 months and 75% power at 36 months (two-sided p value of 0.05). With approximately 280 patients per group, this will equate to a total difference of 140 CMBs between aspirin and placebo. These calculations included a 15% inflation for a lack of normality22 and a further 5% for dropout, loss to follow-up, and crossover. As multiple measurements per participant will further increase the power of the study, these calculations are conservative; however, without knowledge of the within-person correlation between data points, it is impossible to know by how much power would be increased.

Statistical analyses

At the ASPREE study completion in 2018, the ASPREE-NEURO sub-study will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Continuous-scale outcomes will initially be assessed for normality and log-transformed where appropriate. Changes in outcomes over time will be determined using mixed linear (or non-linear) longitudinal modeling with main effects fitted for treatment and time and an interaction between the two to determine if the groups behaved differently over time. Additional sensitivity analyses will be performed adjusting for known predictors of outcome (age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors) and any baseline imbalances between groups. Where missing data are found to exceed 5%, additional analysis will be conducted using multiple imputation. Subgroup analysis will be performed by presence or absence of CMB at baseline. A two-sided p value of 0.05 or less will be considered to be statistically significant.

The relationship between changing CMB number and cognitive function will also be determined using the mixed linear longitudinal model for 3MS measurements over time.

Discussion

The ASPREE-NEURO trial is to our knowledge the first randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of daily, low-dose aspirin on the number of CMBs (primary outcome measure). This is important as a higher number of CMBs has previously been shown to increase the risk of clinically significant outcomes.25,26 This study will also ascertain the clinical significance of change in CMB count by measuring associations with cognitive outcomes, and quantifying the relationship between CMB count and cerebrovascular outcomes and cognitive function in an exploratory analysis. The MRI measurement at three time points will enable illustration of the time course of any aspirin effect in older people over three years of aspirin usage for primary prevention.

Summary and conclusions

Aspirin is widely used by older adults.27 While aspirin is well evidenced for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, it is also prescribed for primary prevention, despite conflicting guidelines. The ASPREE-NEURO findings will augment the outcomes of the principal ASPREE trial, by showing whether low-dose aspirin affects CMB development, in the healthy elderly. Secondly, it will determine whether any aspirin-associated changes in CMBs are associated with changes in cognitive function, and whether low-dose aspirin limits changes in WMH volume. Thirdly, it will determine whether CMB presence identifies a subgroup for whom the risk:benefit ratio for primary prevention with low-dose aspirin is altered. Our findings may be applicable to populations beyond the healthy elderly.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

Acknowledgements

The investigators would like to acknowledge the National Institute on Aging (NIA) for funding the principal ASPREE trial, the Victorian Cancer Agency and Monash University for support of ASPREE in Australia and Monash University for providing funding for baseline MRI acquisition for ASPREE-NEURO. The investigators acknowledge Bayer who has provided the study medication free of charge. The investigators also acknowledge the work of all ASPREE field research staff, those at MBI conducting the MRIs, and Dr Jessica Lockery and David O’Reilly for data and project management. Finally, the investigators acknowledge the valued contribution of the ASPREE participants and the support from their general practitioners.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The ASPREE study has been funded principally by the National Institute on Aging (grant number 1RO1AG029824-01A2), the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (grant number 334047), Monash University and the Victorian Cancer Agency. ASPREE-NEURO has funding from the NHMRC (grant number 1086188), and support from Monash Biomedical Imaging.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Geoffrey A Donnan has served on scientific advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe Dohme, and Pfizer. He is funded by National Health and Medical Research Council Grant No 1013612. John J McNeil has a consultancy with Johnson and Johnson. Stephanie A Ward is an investigator on a Novartis trial, but has not received any funding. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Amy Brodtmann and Geoffrey Donnan serve on the editorial boards of the International Journal of Stroke.

References

  • 1.Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2014; 383: 245–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wardlaw JM, Smith C and Dichgans M. Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging. Lancet Neurol 2013; 22: 483–497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yates PA, Villemagne VL, Ellis KA, Desmond PM, Masters CL and Rowe CC. Cerebral microbleeds: a review of clinical, genetic, and neuroimaging associations. Front Neurol 2014; 4: 205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fisher M, French S, Ji P and Kim RC. Cerebral microbleeds in the elderly: a pathological analysis. Stroke 2010; 41: 2782–2785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martinez-Ramirez S, Greenberg SM and Viswanathan A. Cerebral microbleeds: overview and implications in cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Res Ther 2014; 6: 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ding J, Sigurdsson S, Garcia M, et al. Risk factors associated with incident cerebral microbleeds according to location in older people: the age, gene/environment susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik study. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72: 682–688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Poels MM, Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds: an update of the Rotterdam scan study. Stroke 2010; 41: S103–S106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gorelick PB. Cerebral microbleeds: evidence of heightened risk associated with aspirin use. Arch Neurol 2009; 66: 691–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu S and Li C. Antiplatelet drug use and cerebral microbleeds: a meta-analysis of published studies. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015; 10: 2236–2244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Romero JR, Preis SR, Beiser A, et al. Risk factors, stroke prevention treatments, and prevalence of cerebral microbleeds in the Framingham Heart Study. Stroke 2014; 45 :1492–1494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Charidimou A and Werring DJ. Cerebral microbleeds as a predictor of macrobleeds: what is the evidence? Int J Stroke 2014; 9: 457–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang DN, Hou XW, Yang BW, Lin Y, Shi JP and Wang N. Quantity of cerebral microbleeds, antiplatelet therapy, and intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015; 12: 2728–2737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Naka H, Nomura E, Kitamura J, Imamura E, Wakabayashi S and Matsumoto M. Antiplatelet therapy as a risk factor for microbleeds in intracerebral hemorrhage patients: analysis using specific antiplatelet agents. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 834–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fujita S, Kawaguchi T, Uehara T and Fukushima K. Progress of leukoaraiosis is inhibited by correction of platelet hyper-aggregability. Int Psychogeriatr 2005; 17: 689–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baigent C, Blackwell L, Collins R, et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 2009; 373: 1849–1860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.ASPREE Investigator Group. Study design of ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE): a randomized, controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2013; 36: 555–564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu C, Li W, Tong KA, Yeom KW and Kuzminski S. Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 42: 23–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Teng EL and Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry 1987; 48: 314–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ruff RM, Light RH, Parker SB and Levin HS. Benton Controlled Oral Word Association Test: reliability and updated norms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1996; 11: 329–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shapiro AM, Benedict RH, Schretlen D and Brandt J. Construct and concurrent validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised. Clin Neuropsychol 1999; 13: 348–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smith A. Symbol digit modalities test (SDMT). Manual (revised). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Troyer AK, Leach L and Strauss E. Aging and response inhibition: normative data for the victoria stroop test. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2006; 13: 20–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.D’Elia L. Color trails test: professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.ASPREE Protocol Version 9 Date November 2014, http://www.aspree.org/usa/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/ASPREE-Protocol-Version-9_-Nov2014_FINAL.pdf (accessed 5 December 2015).
  • 25.Akoudad S, Portegies ML, Koudstaal PJ, et al. Cerebral microbleeds are associated with an increased risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 2015; 132: 509–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miwa K, Tanaka M, Okazaki S, et al. Multiple or mixed cerebral microbleeds and dementia in patients with vascular risk factors. Neurology 2014; 83: 646–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Williams CD, Chan AT, Elman MR, et al. Aspirin use among adults in the U.S.: results of a national survey. Am J Prev Med 2015; 48: 501–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

RESOURCES