Abstract
A catalytic enantioselective method for the synthesis of 1,4-ketoalkenylboronate esters via a rhodium-catalyzed conjugate addition pathway is disclosed. A variety of novel, bench-stable alkenyl gem-diboronate esters are synthesized. These easily accessible reagents react smoothly with a collection of cyclic α,β-unsaturated ketones, generate a new C–C bond and stereocenter. Products are isolated in up to 99% yield, >20:1 E/Z, and >99:1 er. Mechanistic studies show the site-selectivity of transmetalation and reactivity is ligand dependent. The utility of the approach is highlighted by gram-scale synthesis of enantioenriched cyclic 1,4-diketones, and stereoselective transformations entailing hydrogenation, allylation, and isomerization.
Keywords: 1,1-Diborylalkenes; Conjugate addition; Rhodium; Enantioselective; Umpolung
Graphical Abstract
An enantioselective method for the synthesis of 1,4-keto-alkenylboronate esters via a Rh-catalyzed 1,4-addition is disclosed. A variety of alkenyl gem-diboronate esters react smoothly with a range of cyclic enones to afford products bearing an E-alkenylboron, which are isolated in up to 99% yield, >20:1 E/Z, and >99:1 er. Mechanistic studies show the site-selectivity of transmetalation and reactivity is ligand dependent.

1,4-Dicarbonyl compounds are common motifs in natural products and serve as versatile intermediates to the synthesis of pharmaceutical scaffolds.[1] These compounds are difficult to access as constructing their 1,4-relationship usually requires polarity inversion methods[2] or oxidative coupling processes and chiral, pre-functionalized starting materials. The stereoselective synthesis of 1,4-dicarbonyls is highly sought after and even though recent advances have been reported, notable deficiencies still remain in this area. Most current methods for enantioselective synthesis of 1,4-dicarbonyl moieties rely on the use of stoichiometric chiral auxiliaries as demonstrated by the pioneering work of Baran,[3] Thomson,[4] and Maulide[5] (Scheme 1 A). These methods employ pre-functionalized starting materials and are applicable only to generating acyclic 1,4-dicarbonyl motifs. Catalytic enantioselective methods for the synthesis of 1,4-carbonyls have largely centered around the enantioselective Stetter reaction,6 and the acyl anion reactivity enabled by chiral NHCs.[7] In addition, related catalytic enantioselective umpolung reactions have been developed that employ acyl silanes,[8] acyl radicals,[9] and enamine radical cations,[10] which afford good enantioselectivities, however, reactions are limited to acyclic substrates, excluding access to cyclic scaffolds.
Scheme 1.

Enantioselective Synthesis of 1,4-Dicarbonyl Compounds.
Previously, our group and others have developed catalytic enantioselective C–C bond forming methods that employ alkyl gem-diborons; for example, additions to carbonyls,[11] imines,[12] and allyl[13] electrophiles, and cross coupling.[14] In wherein the alkyl boron products serve as versatile groups for accessing a wide array of chemical functionality, including boron oxidation transformations that overall correspond to net umpolung reactivity. To address some of the deficiencies in the stereoselective preparation of cyclic 1,4-dicarbonyls, and other cyclic 1,4-functionality, we set out to examine the application of α-boryl–C(sp2)–metal nucleophiles (e.g., 2) in enantioselective conjugate addition;[15],[16] such a process concurrently generates a C–C bond and installs an alkenyl C(sp2)-boronate ester as masked acyl synthon (3),[17] or a functional handle for other downstream transformations (Scheme 1C). To access the requisite α-boryl–C(sp2) nucleophiles (e.g., 2) we planned to take advantage of the reactivity of 1,1-diborylalkenyl reagents (1),[18] which have recently generated great interest in the synthetic community;[19] however, to-date their applications have been limited to non-enantioselective bond formations such as cross coupling.[20] Furthermore, 1,1-diborylalkenes are readily accessible bench stable reagents. Potential challenges that arise in the reaction of 1 are (i) site-specific transmetalation, (ii) the control of alkenyl boron geometry, and (iii) avoiding proto-deboration of starting material 1 or product 4. Herein, we report on the first general method for the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of cyclic 1,4-keto-alkenylboronate esters with facile access to the corresponding 1,4-diketones.
We initiated our studies with the reaction of cyclohexenone 6 with 1,1-diborylalkenylhexene 7a (Table 1). A key objective of the optimization centered on the ability to efficiently and selectively form the desired C–C bond in high enantioselectivity, and E/Z ratio while maintaining mild conditions to avoid protodeborative side reactions. When cyclohexenone 6 (1.0 equiv) and 1,1-diborylalkene 7a (1.05 equiv) are subjected to aqueous basic conditions in the presence of 2.5 mol % [Rh(coe)2Cl]2 and L1 at 22 °C in dioxane/H2O for 18 h, 57% conversion to 1,4-ketoalkenylboronate ester 8 is observed as a 1:2 mixture of E/Z isomers, in >99:1 er (E) and 50:50 er (Z), respectively). Of particular note, is disparity in er corresponding to each alkene isomer, while the E-isomer is formed in high er, the Z-isomer is formed as the racemate. Phosphine ligands L2 and L3 failed to significantly improve conversion and E/Z selectivity, and Josiphos ligand L4 proved ineffective resulting in <2% conversion to 8. With phosphine ligand L5, we found that 8 was generated in 17% as a single E-olefin isomer and in 99:1 er. Improved conversion was obtained with MTBE as solvent (entry 7), and through further optimization it was found that K2CO3 furnished 8 in the greatest efficiency (83% conv) (entry 9). These optimal conditions met our dual requirements for high selectivity and mild reaction conditions.
Table 1.
Optimization of Rh(I)–Catalyzed α-Borylalkenyl 1,4-Addition[a]
![]() | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Ligand | Base | Solvent | Conv (%)[b] | E:Z ratio[b] | er[c] |
| 1[d] | - | - | dioxane | 100 | 1:3 | - |
| 2 | L1 | KOH | dioxane | 57 | 1:2 | >99:1(E);50:50(Z) |
| 3 | L2 | KOH | dioxane | 8 | 1:2 | >99:1(E);50:50(Z) |
| 4 | L3 | KOH | dioxane | 20 | 1:3 | >99:1(E);50:50(Z) |
| 5 | L4 | KOH | dioxane | <2 | - | - |
| 6 | L5 | KOH | dioxane | 17 | >20:1 | >99:1 |
| 7 | L5 | KOH | MTBE | 64 | >20:1 | >99:1 |
| 8 | L5 | Na2Co3 | MTBE | 67 | >20:1 | >99:1 |
| 9 | L5 | K2Co3 | MTBE | 83 | >20:1 | >99:1 |
![]() | ||||||
Reactions performed under N2 atmosphere.
Yields and E:Z ratios determined by analysis of 400, 500, or 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra of crude reactions with DMF as internal standard.
Enantiomeric ratios (er) determined by HPLC analysis; see the SI for details.
With [Rh(cod)OMe]2.
With the optimized conditions in hand, we set out to investigate the scope of the 1,1-diborylalkene component in 1,4-addition (Scheme 2). We found that a wide variety of functionality was tolerated and afforded products in excellent yields and enantiomeric ratios. Furthermore, all products were furnished as single E alkene isomers where applicable. An array of trisubstituted 1,1-diborylalkenes participate in the reaction including alkyl groups 8a–c of varying steric bulk. In addition, the reaction is amenable to scalability as exemplified by the 1 gram synthesis of 8a with 1.0 mol % Rh catalyst loading. Reactions with 1,1-diborylalkenes bearing TBS ether 8d and 3-propylphenyl 8e moieties proceeded efficiently as well. Heterocycles such as indole and furan 8f and 8g participated as does 8h, derived from (R)-(+)-citronellal, offering opportunities to introduce complexity from chiral pool molecules. Unsubstituted parent ethylene 1,1-diboron was also found to be well tolerated, and upon oxidation 8i furnishes a formal acetyl conjugate addition product. Unsaturated diene products are also accessible through this method; 8j is formed in 95% yield and 98:2 er. Notable exceptions to the optimal reaction conditions are styrenyl and tetrasubstituted 1,1-diboron reagents. Such reagents undergo rapid metal-catalyzed protodeboration to the corresponding alkenyl-monoboron, which then undergo rapid alkenyl conjugate addition. To overcome this limitation and supress protodeboration a KIE effect was employed. By using D2O in place of H2O, reactivity could be restored albeit at the cost of incorporating a deuterium atom α to the carbonyl. Nonetheless, through the modified protocol products 8k–m could be accessed in high yield and er. Tetrasubstituted 1,1-diboron 7n proved resilient to the modified conditions (>98% protodeboration); considering the complete loss in er for Z-isomer products (Table 1, entries 2–4) it is unclear if 8n could be formed enantioselectively.
Scheme 2.

Alkenyl 1,1-Diboron Scope. Reactions performed under N2 atm on 0.05 mmol scale with 1.0 equiv of 6, 1.05 equiv. of 7a-n, in 0.165 ml of MTBE/H2O (10:1). Yields and enantiomeric ratios of the isolated products 8a–n are indicated below each entry (average of two runs per substrate). [a] Conversion to 8i; value determined by analysis of 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra of crude mixtures with DMF as internal standard. [b] Product isolated and characterized as the 1,4-diketone upon oxidation. [c] Reaction with D2O instead of H2O.
A broad range of cyclic enones participate in the reaction with high efficiency (Scheme 3). Varying the enone ring size (5→8) 11–13, and gem-dimethyl substitution on the ring 14 were allowed. Spirocyclic enone 15, formed in 94% yield and 99:1 er, is a solid and permitted an X-ray structure to be obtained and the absolute stereochemistry to be determined as R.[21] Cyclic enones containing an oxygen atom at the 4-position are also effective substrates, as demonstrated by the formation of 16 in 91% yield and in 94:6 er. Remarkably, 6-Me substituted enone 17, formed from racemic starting material, participates in a dynamic kinetic resolution to provide product in 95% yield, >20:1 dr, and 99:1 er. Racemic prostaglandin related 3-TBSO-cyclopentenone can also participate in the reaction through a kinetic resolution to provide 18 in 47% NMR yield, >20:1 dr, and 86:14 er. At present, unfortunately, this current method does not appear to be compatible with acyclic enones, which do not participate in C–C bond formation.[22]
Scheme 3.
Enone Scope. Reactions performed under N2 atm on 0.05 mmol scale with 1.0 equiv of 9, 1.05 equiv. of 7, in 0.165 ml of MTBE/H2O (10:1). Yields and enantiomeric ratios of the isolated products 11–18 are indicated below each entry (average of two runs per substrate). [a] Conversion to 17 and 18; values determined by analysis of 400 or 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra of crude mixtures with DMF as internal standard. [b] Product isolated and characterized as the 1,4-diketone upon oxidation.
The synthetic applicability of this method towards the gram scale synthesis of enantioenriched 1,4-diketones with lower catalyst loading, is highlighted in the efficient preparation of diketone 20 through a telescoped process. Treatment of cycloheptenone 19 with 1.0 g of indole-derived diboron 7f in the presence of 1.0 mol % Rh catalyst, followed by oxidation of the crude product with NaBO3•4H2O affords 1,4-diketone 20 in 87% yield and 97:3 er.
Next, we sought to garner information regarding the mechanism of 1,1-diborylalkene transmetalation.[23],[14a] While the reaction with L5 seemed straightforward the observation of E/Z mixture of products with other L1–L3 suggested otherwise. In this regard, isotopically enriched Z-10B-7a was regioselectively synthesized (see SI for details) and subjected to a variety of reaction conditions (Scheme 5). Accordingly, if transmetalation is site-selective for the sterically less hindered E-B(pin) group, product 8a will show mass ions related to the increased abundance of 10B proportional to the transmetalation selectivity. Mass spectral analysis of 8a, formed under standard reaction conditions with Z-10B-7a (Scheme 5A), shows an isotopic composition consistent with that expected for a reaction where either boronate is transmetalated non-selectively (55:45 E-B(pin):Z-B(pin)). This surprising outcome indicates that transmetalation proceeds equally effectively from either B(pin) group, and the resulting Z-α-boryl–C(sp2)-Rh(I) species isomerizes to the E-isomer, which undergoes faster 1,4-addition. The observed isomerization is consistent with stereomutation observed in other hetero-gem-bismetallic alkenyl species.[24] As a control reaction to check for alkoxide promoted boron exchange in Z-10B-7a,[25] stoichiometric reaction between Z-10B-7a and one equivalent of 21 in MTBE in the absence of K2CO3 or H2O/MeOH, followed by quench with 6 (2 equiv) was performed (Scheme 5B). The reaction furnished cyclohexanone 8a in 82% NMR yield (1.0:2.6 E/Z), and the isotopic composition of the separate E-8a and Z-8a isomers shows that they arise primarily from a slightly Z-selective transmetalation (34:66 E:Z), which is followed by 1,4-addition with minimal E↔Z alkenyl–Rh isomerization. The corresponding catalytic reaction with 2.5 mol % [Rh(cod)Cl]2 in MeOH and K2CO3 also affords a similar result (Scheme 5C): 95% NMR yield, 1.0:3:3 E/Z, and with isotopic distributions indicating E-8a and Z-8a are formed by 33:67 E:Z TM, with slow interconversion of both alkenyl–Rh intermediates prior to 1,4-addition. The preference for TM of the Z-B(pin) likely occurs due to the sterically smaller (cod)Rh–OR being able to react more readily with the more hindered but strained Z-B(pin). Overall, these data provide a working mechanism, where (L5)-Rh reactions proceed via a non-selective transmetalation of 22 → 23 and 24, followed by alkenyl-Rh isomerization and enantioselective 1,4-addition through E-alkenyl-Rh 23. In comparison, (cod)-Rh and (L1)-Rh undergo Z-selective TM, followed by 1,4-addition from both 23 and 24 with equal facility and minimal alkenyl-Rh stereomutation. Notably, in all cases, L1–L5, only high enantioselectivity is observed in the 1,4-addition of the E-alkenyl-Rh 24.[26] Such non-observable subtleties related to site-selective TM and isomerization could be relevant to other stereospecific reactions of 1,1-alkenyldiborons.[20]
Scheme 5.

Mechanistic Insights of 1,1-Diborylalkene Transmetalation. See SI for details.
The 1,4-ketoalkenylboronate esters accessed through the conjugate addition method can be further elaborated through a wide variety of synthetically valuable transformations. For example, compound 8a can be easily oxidized to the corresponding 1,4-diketone 25 with no loss of er, providing a general access to otherwise inaccessible chiral, non-racemic cyclic 1,4-diketones. In addition, 8a can engage in subsequent Pd-catalyzed cross coupling to generate stereodefined trisubstituted alkenes; the synthesis of heterocycle 26 in 91% yield from 3-bromopyridine is representative. Generation of the opposite alkene isomer inaccessible through the 1,4-addition method can be achieved through a stereospecific boron–bromine exchange.[27] Treatment of boronate ester 8a with Br2 and NaOMe results in alkene stereoinversion to generate alkenylbromide 27 in 82% yield (>20:1 E:Z). The 1,4-keto-alkenylboronate esters also participate in a variety of diastereoselective transformations (Scheme 6B). For example, compound 15 undergoes hydrogenation in the presence of 2 mol % Crabtree’s catalyst in CH2Cl2 to afford the corresponding C(sp3)-boronate ester 28 in 99% yield and >20:1 dr, which can be further elaborated. Remarkably, conversion of ketone 15 to the corresponding enoxysilane, followed by a telescoped homologation and allylation sequence with chloroiodomethane and benzaldehyde, respectively, furnishes silylenolether 29 in 74% yield (2 steps) bearing two additional stereocenters formed in >20:1 dr, and a 1,1-disubstituted olefin.
Scheme 6.

Synthetic Versatility of 1,4-Ketoalkenylboronate Esters. See SI for details.
In summary, we have introduced a catalytic enantioselective conjugate addition of α-boryl–C(sp2) nucleophiles for the synthesis of 1,4-ketoalkenylboronate esters. Reactions employ easily accessible 1,1-diborylalkenes and proceed in excellent yields, dr, and er. Mechanistic data shows that the reactions with (L5)-Rh arise from a non-selective transmetalation followed by isomerization, and 1,4-addition through the E-alkenyl-Rh. The resulting 1,4-ketoalkenylboronate esters are readily transformed into the corresponding 1,4-dicarbonyls, as well as to a range of useful molecular scaffolds. Further studies on the reactivity of 1,1-diborylalkenes are in progress.
Supplementary Material
Scheme 4.

Gram-Scale Enantioselective Synthesis of 1,4-Dicarbonyl 20 with 1.0 mol % Rh catalyst loading.
Acknowledgements
Financial support was provided by the United States National Institutes of Health, Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM116987) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. We thank Dr. Chun-Hsing Chen of UNC for X-ray structure elucidation of 15. AllyChem is acknowledged for donations of B2(pin)2.
References
- [1] (a).Whittaker M, Floyd CD, Brown P, Gearing AJH, Chem. Rev 1999, 99, 2735–2776; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fujisawa T, Ugeta K, Odake S, Yasuo M, Yasuda J, Morikawa T, Bioorg. Med. Chem 2002, 10, 2569–2581; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Paal C, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges 1884, 17, 2756–2767; [Google Scholar]; (d) Knorr L, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges 1884, 17, 2863–2870. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Seebach D, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 1979, 18, 239–258; Angew. Chem. 1979, 91, 259–278 [Google Scholar]
- [3] (a).Baran PS, DeMartino MP, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2006, 45, 7083–7086; Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 7241–7244; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) DeMartino MP, Chen K, Baran PS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 11546–11560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Robinson EE, Thomson RJ, R. J, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 1956–1965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Kaldre D, Klose I, Maulide N, Science 2018, 361, 664–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Stetter H, Schreckenberg M, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 1973, 12, 81–81, Angew. Chem. 1973, 85, 89–89. [Google Scholar]
- [7] (a).Enders D, Balensiefer T, Acc. Chem. Res 2004, 37, 534–541; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Enders D, Han J, Henseler A, Chem. Commun 2008, 34, 3989–3991; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Enders D, Han J, Synthesis 2008, 2008, 3864–3868; [Google Scholar]; (d) DiRocco DA, Rovis T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 10402–10405; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Liu Q, Perreault S, Rovis T, T J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 14066–14067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Jousseaume T, Wurz NE, Glorius F, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011, 50, 1410–1414; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 123, 1446–1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Nahm MR, Potnick JR, White PS, Johnson JS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 2751–2756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Goti G, Bieszczad B, Vega-Peñaloza A, Melchiorre P, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2019, 58, 1213–1217; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 1226–1230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10] (a).Jang H-Y, Hong J-B, MacMillan DWC, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 7004–7005; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Huang S, Kötzner L, De CK, List B, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 3446–3449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11] (a).Joannou MV, Moyer BS, Goldfogel MJ, Meek SJ, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 14141–14145; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 14347–14351; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Joannou MV, Moyer BS, Meek SJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 6176–6179; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Murray SA, Green JC, Tailor S, Meek SJ, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 9065–9069; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 9211–9215; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Miura T, Nakahashi J, Murakami M, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 6989–6993; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 7093–7097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Miura T, Nakahashi J, Zhou W, Shiratori Y, Stewart SG, Murakami M, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 10903–10908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12] (a).Kim J, Ko K, Cho SH, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 11584–11588; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 11742–11746. For a catalytic diastereoselective variant, see: J. Park, Y. Lee, J. Kim, S. H. Cho, Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 1210–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13] (a).Shi Y, Hoveyda AH, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 3455–3458; Angew. Chem. 128, 3516–3519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhan M, Li R-Z, Mou Z-D, Cao C-G, Liu J, Chen Y-W, Niu D, ACS Catalysis 2016, 6, 3381–3386. [Google Scholar]
- [14] (a).Sun C, Potter B, Morken JP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 6534–6537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Potter B, Szymaniak AA, Edelstein EK, Morken JP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 17918–17921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sun HY, Kubota K, Hall DG, Chem. Eur. J 2015, 21, 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15] (a).Hayashi T, Yamasaki K, Chem. Rev 2003, 103, 2829–2844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Berthon G, Hayashi T, in Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Reactions, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2010, pp. 1–70. [Google Scholar]
- [16].(a) For examples of catalytic non-enantioselective 1,4-additions of 1,1-bimetalloalkenes (gem-borazirconocenes), see: Deloux L, Skrzypczak-Jankun E, Cheesman BV, Srebnik M, Sabat M, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 10302–10303. [Google Scholar]; (b) Pereira S, Srebnik M, Tetrahedron Lett 1995, 36, 1805–1808. [Google Scholar]
- [17].For an example of enantioselective 1,4-addition of alkenylsilanes, see: May TL, Dabrowski JA, Hoveyda AH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 736–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].For a review on sp2 geminated organobismetallic species, see: Marek I, Chem. Rev 2000, 100, 2887–2900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19] (a).Hata T, Kitagawa H, Masai H, Kurahashi T, Shimizu M, Hiyama T, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2001, 40, 790–792; Angew. Chem 2001, 113, 812–814; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ho HE, Asao N, Yamamoto Y, Jin T, Org. Lett 2014, 16, 4670–4673; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Morinaga A, Nagao K, Ohmiya H, Sawamura M, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 15859–15862; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 16084–16088; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Krautwald S, Bezdek MJ, Chirik PJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 3868–3875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Procter RJ, Uzelac M, Cid J, Rushworth PJ, Ingleson MJ, ACS Catal 2019, 5760–5771. [Google Scholar]
- [20] (a).Shimizu M, Nakamaki C, Shimono K, Schelper M, Kurahashi T, Hiyama T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005, 127, 12506–12507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wen H, Zhang L, Zhu S, Liu G, Huang Z, ACS Catal 2017, 7, 6419–6425. [Google Scholar]
- [21].CCDC 1935756 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 15. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.
- [22].For example, reactions with either benzylideneacetone or E-3-nonen-2-one resulted in <5% conv.
- [23] (a).Zhao P, Incarvito CD, Hartwig JF, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 1876–1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24] (a).Eisch JJ, Foxton MW, J. Org. Chem 1971, 36, 3520–3526. [Google Scholar]; (b) Eisch JJ, Rhee S-G, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1975, 97, 4673–4682. [Google Scholar]
- [25].The possibility that 1,1-diboron species undergo thermal isomerization was explored, but ruled out through a hydroboration/protodeboration experiment (see Supporting Information).
- [26].Unfortunately, further examination of the transmetalation step between 7a and 21 by 1H NMR analysis (>98% consumption of 7a in 6 h at 22 °C) proved inconclusive.
- [27].Morrill C, Grubbs RH, J. Org. Chem 2003, 68, 6031–6034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



