Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences logoLink to Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences
. 2019 Jul 28;7(14):2271–2276. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.244

Evaluation of the Potential Association of Platelet Levels, Mean Platelet Volume and Platelet Distribution Width with Acute Appendicitis

Hossein Najd Sepas 1, Alireza Negahi 2, Seyed Hamzeh Mousavie 2, Mohammad Nasiri 2,*
PMCID: PMC6765097  PMID: 31592065

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The occurrence and early management of acute appendicitis among children are especially important due to the difficult diagnosis and nonspecific symptoms of the disease. Diagnosis of appendicitis in children is very difficult due to similarity of its symptoms to other diseases, and also its self-limiting nature Platelet indexes such as mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW) have been suggested as a biomarker of inflammation.

AIM:

Therefore, we examined the association of MPV and PDW with acute appendicitis in children.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 464 patients with suspected acute appendicitis under the age of 18 years referred to the specialised hospitals of the ten studied provinces between October 2014 and October 2015. All data obtained regarding patient’s lab tests, i.e. platelet count, MPV and PDW and also radiological studies and surgical reports were gathered in datasheets and analysed to evaluate the potential association of platelet levels, mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW) with acute appendicitis

RESULTS:

Our results showed that the MPV was significantly higher in acute appendicitis in comparison to perforated appendicitis as well as acute gangrenous appendicitis. PDW was significantly higher in acute appendicitis in comparison to perforated appendicitis and acute gangrenous appendicitis. The current project indicated that PDW < 10.05 had a sensitivity of 35% and specificity of 75%, platelet count < 229500 had a sensitivity of 24% and specificity of 75% and MPV < 8.95 had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 71%.

CONCLUSION:

Our study suggested that platelet indexes such as MPV and PDW could significantly correlate with acute appendicitis in pediatric patients. Hence, we believe that both MPV and PDW could use as a simple and low-cost lab test for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Also, this study revealed that the MPV lower than 8.95 could be a novel index for diagnosing acute appendicitis with sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 71%.

Keywords: Platelet levels, Mean platelet volume (MPV), Platelet distribution width (PDW), Acute appendicitis

Introduction

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common reasons for emergent surgery in all age subgroups around the world, only in the United States; the annual incidence of pediatric cases suffering acute appendicitis is estimated to be around 70.000 with notably higher incidence in the developed countries [1], [2], [3]. The incidence of disease in children aged birth to 4 years is about 1 to 2 cases per 10,000 children per year, reaching 25 cases per 10,000 children per year in older children [4]. The prevalence of disease in boys is twice that of girls with a brief distinction in different countries [5], [6]. The prevalence of acute appendicitis in developed countries is higher probably due to low fibre diet, genetic susceptibilities, as well as different patterns in gastrointestinal flora [7]. From the perspective of pathophysiology, acute appendicitis has been identified as a complex disease with quite a bit of variability in clinical manifestation and pathophysiology. The dominant pathophysiology of disease includes obstruction of the blind-ending appendix frequently due to lymphoid hyperplasia of the submucosal follicles in children following viral infections, dehydration, or fecalith. Other rare causes for appendicitis are parasitic infections, foreign bodies, or inflammatory reactions [8], [9], [10].

Overall, the occurrence and early management of acute appendicitis among children are especially important due to the difficult diagnosis and nonspecific symptoms of the disease. Diagnosis of appendicitis in children is very difficult due to the similarity of its symptoms to other diseases and also its self-limiting nature [11]. It may not have the classic features seen in adults, and therefore hence, doctors may be challenged in terms of timely diagnosis and treatment. Its late diagnosis is common in children that one-third of preoperative children may suffer from perforation with increased the likelihood of mortality and morbidity [12]. Moreover, about 10 to 30% of appendectomies seem not to be necessary for children that can increase morbidity and healthcare costs [13].

Typically, decisions about appendectomy in acute abdominal pain refer to the other causes expressed by the patient (anorexia, nausea, vomiting and pain migration), examinations and clinical symptoms (fever, tenderness, and rebound tenderness, guarding, psoas sign and etc.) and serum tests (white blood cell count and polymorphonuclear neutrophils) [14]. However, various studies have been reported negative appendectomy in 15-30% of cases, especially in children. Negative appendectomy is associated with severe complications such as wound infections, obstruction and infertility due to damage to the uterine tubes. Imposing an unnecessary surgery may also lead to complications such as intestinal adhesions and loss of efficacy [15], [16].

A recent study in Iran showed that the number of white blood cells, the percentage of neutrophils and CRP are some diagnostic factors of acute appendicitis [17]. Recently, it has been shown that platelet count and its morphological assay in the lab test can have valuable predictive values in different gastrointestinal disorders and their surgical outcomes [18]. Also, it has been shown that higher platelet counts are associated with negative outcomes in critically ill patients. Thus, considering the need for determining better diagnostic methods for appendicitis specifically in children, in this study we have evaluated the potential association of platelet levels, mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW) with the incidence of acute appendicitis.

Material and Methods

This study was a descriptive cross-sectional conducted on 464 patients with suspected appendicitis under the age of 18 years referred to the specialised hospitals of the studied provinces between October 2014 and October 2015. Ten provinces (Tehran, Arak, Kashan, Tabriz, Bandar-e-Abbas, Karaj, Hamadan, Kermanshah, Zanjan, Mashhad and Shiraz) out of the 31 provinces were randomly selected from Iran. The criteria for suspected acute appendicitis were included fever (temperature > 38ºC), vomiting, history of anorexia and vague periumbilical pain following migration of pain to the right lower quadrant, tenderness, rebound tenderness in physical examination and increased white blood cell (elevation of the neutrophil or band count can be seen without elevation of the total WBC count). In abdominal radiography, the main criteria for acute appendicitis were convex lumbar scoliosis, obliteration of the right psoas margin, right lower quadrant air-fluid levels, air in the appendix, and localised ileus. In abdominal ultrasonography, main finding was a non-compressible tubular structure 6 mm or wider in the right lower quadrant with local tenderness. The diagnosis of appendicitis was finally approved according to the surgical findings and post-operative pathological assessments. The patient’s data collected and entered into the checklist by reviewing the hospital records including gender, age, chief complaints and clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, histopathology reports, findings on physical examination and imaging assessments, preoperative prophylaxis, surgery report, in-hospital complications, and length of hospitalisation.

Descriptive analysis was used to describe the data, including mean ± standard deviation (SD) for quantitative variables and frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. Comparison of numerical data means was based on ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test and student’s t-test. Also, Spearman correlation was used for indicated the correlation of study variables, i.e. platelet count, MPV and PDW with appendicitis incidence. Correlated variables were then analysed with the ROC curve to indicate their sensitivity and specificity for predicting appendicitis incidence and the decent cut-off values.

Results

In this study, 464 patients admitted to the university hospital with appendicitis symptoms were studied among whom 179 (38.6%) were female, and 285 (61.4%) were male. These patients had a mean age of 110 months which had a standard deviation of 40.8 months (range 1-216).

Through their admission, clinical and preclinical assessments confirmed the final diagnosis of appendicitis in 90.3% of these cases. Among these cases, 411 patients (88.6%) underwent open surgery while 52 were operated with laparoscopy (11.2%) and only one patient did not undergo surgical treatment (0.2%) due to denying consent for the operation.

Post-operative assessments on the obtained tissue were performed to determine the underlying pathology. As it is demonstrated in Table.1 acute appendicitis, perforated appendicitis, acute gangrenous appendicitis and reactive follicular hyperplasia were the most frequent findings whereas 22 operated patients were revealed to have normal appendix tissue.

Table 1.

Underlying pathologies in the study population

Pathology Frequency Per cent Valid Percent
Normal 22 4.7 4.8
Acute appendicitis (Acute suppurative, early acute & acute appendicitis) 253 54.5 54.6
Eosinophilic appendicitis 2 0.4 0.4
Perforated appendicitis 39 8.4 8.4
Mucosal lymphoid follicular hyperplasia 1 0.2 0.2
Lymphoid follicular hyperplasia 12 2.6 2.6
Vermiform appendicitis 1 0.2 0.2
Obliteration appendix 1 0.2 0.2
Vermiform appendix 1 0.2 0.2
Acute gangrenous appendicitis 69 14.9 14.9
Serosal edema and congestion 1 0.2 0.2
Suppurative Appendicitis 7 1.5 1.5
Necrotic 1 0.2 0.2
Appendicitis 4 0.9 0.9
Congestion 6 1.3 1.3
Reactive follicular hyperplasia 41 8.8 8.9
Embedded 2 0.4 0.4
Total 463 99.8 100.0
Missing 1 0.2
Total 464 100.0
Open in a new tab

The obtained blood tests at the time of admission in these patients revealed a mean platelet count of 279271 ± 113806 platelets per microliter of blood, mean platelet volume (MPV) of 9.18 ± 4 fL and platelet distribution width (PDW) of 11.41 ± 2.2 Fl.

Comparison of platelet count, MPV and PDW between different acute appendicitis, perforated appendicitis and acute gangrenous appendicitis pathologies

Results of one-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference between the three types of acute appendicitis, perforated appendicitis and acute gangrenous appendicitis regarding PDW (F (2.355) = 27.57, p-value < 0.001) and MPV (F (2,354) = 26.22, p-value < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed in platelet counts between these groups.

Furthermore, results of the Tukey’s post-hoc test revealed that mean MPV was significantly higher in acute appendicitis compared to perforated appendicitis (p-value = 0.001) and acute gangrenous appendicitis (p-value < 0.001) while there was no significant difference between acute gangrenous appendicitis and perforated appendicitis in this regard (p-value = 0.248). Also, it was shown that mean PDW was significantly higher in acute appendicitis compared to perforated appendicitis (p-value < 0.001) and acute gangrenous appendicitis (p-value < 0.001) while there was no significant difference between acute gangrenous appendicitis and perforated appendicitis in this regard (p-value = 0.333). Table 2 represents the mean of platelet count, MPV and PDW in each group.

Table 2.

Mean of platelet count, MPV and PDW in each appendicitis pathology group

Appendicitis pathology Platelet MPV PDW
Mean SD* Mean SD Mean SD
Acute appendicitis 271538 114966 9.1 1.0 10.9 1.5
Perforated appendicitis 311030 88228 8.1 1.1 12.3 3.5
Acute gangrenous appendicitis 289021 120619 8.4 1.0 13.0 3.0
Open in a new tab
*

SD: Standard deviation.

Evaluation of correlation between platelet count, MPV and PDW and incidence of acute appendicitis, perforated appendicitis and acute gangrenous appendicitis pathologies

Results of spearman’s correlation test for platelet count, MPV and PDW and incidence of acute appendicitis, perforated appendicitis and acute gangrenous appendicitis pathologies revealed a significant negative correlation between acute appendicitis and PDW (correlation coefficient -0.150, p-value = 0.001) and also the platelet count (correlation coefficient -0.1, p-value = 0.048). However, there was a significant positive correlation between acute appendicitis and MPV (correlation coefficient 0.188, p-value < 0.001). Moreover, it was shown that perforated appendicitis had a significant negative correlation with MPV (correlation coefficient -0.260, p-value < 0.001). Finally, analysis results revealed a significant positive correlation between acute gangrenous appendicitis and PDW (correlation coefficient 0.221, p-value < 0.001) and a significant negative correlation between this type of appendicitis and MPV (correlation coefficient -0.245, p-value < 0.001).

Predictive value of platelet count and PDW for appendicitis

To evaluate the Predictive value of platelet count, MPV and PDW for appendicitis ROC curve analysis was performed according to correlation analysis results. In this regard, as most of the correlations were negative, test was set as smaller test indicated more positive test, and for those with positive correlation, the 1/variable was considered for analysis.

Acute appendicitis

ROC curve analysis for variable correlated with acute appendicitis revealed that PDW, platelet count and 1 / MPV are sensitive and specific for determining the incidence of this type of appendicitis (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

ROC curve analysis for variable correlated with acute appendicitis

In this regard the area under curve and p-value were as (AUC:0.594, p-value = 0.001) for PDW, (AUC:0.560, p-value = 0.041) for platelet count and (AUC:0.594, p-value < 0.001) for 1 / MPV.

Furthermore, the coordinate of the curves indicated that PDW < 10.050 had a sensitivity of 35% and specificity of 75%, platelet count < 229500 had a sensitivity of 24% and specificity of 75% and 1/MPV < 0.1058 had a sensitivity of 35% and specificity of 75%.

Perforated appendicitis

ROC curve analysis for variable correlated with acute appendicitis revealed that MPV is sensitive and specific for determining the incidence of this type of appendicitis (Figure 2)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

ROC curve analysis for variable correlated with perforated appendicitis

In this regard, the area under curve and p-value was as (AUC:0.768, p-value < 0.001) for MPV and coordinate of the curves indicated that MPV < 8.25 had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 80%.

Acute gangrenous appendicitis

ROC curve analysis for variable correlated with acute appendicitis revealed that MPV and 1/PDW are sensitive and specific for determining the incidence of this type of appendicitis (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

ROC curve analysis for variable correlated with acute gangrenous appendicitis

In this regard the area under curve and p-value were as (AUC:0.698, p-value = 0 < 001) for MPV and (AUC:0.679, p-value = 0 < 001) for 1 / PDW.

Furthermore, the coordinate of the curves indicated that MPV < 8.95 had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 71% and 1/PDW < 229500 had a sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 76%.

Discussion

According to our reports, on all children who were suspected of acute appendicitis according to initial manifestations, 10% suffered definitively from disease according to surgical findings as the gold diagnostic standard. Although clinical assessment along with different imaging modalities especially ultrasonography can be very helpful to discriminate abnormal from healthy conditions, but could not play a key role in this goal. The obtained prevalence of childhood appendicitis among suspected children is much closer to the rates previously reported. As shown by Wiersma et al. in 2009, the prevalence of appendicitis, proven by surgery and/or pathology, in this study was 34% [15].

The platelet factors such as MPV and PDW are markers that could be easily studied with complete blood count and which is an indicator of platelet function and activation. These markers volume were found to be associated with platelet function and activation [19], [20]. In general, platelet production increases as the platelet count decreases, and young platelets become larger and more reactive, and therefore, the MPV values are higher [21], [22]. In recent years, in some studies in which MPV was tested as a simple inflammatory marker, MPV was reported to have been affected by inflammation, and that it increases significantly in myocardial infarction, sepsis, cerebrovascular diseases, respiratory distress syndrome and chronic pulmonary diseases [23], [24].

In the literature, MPV has been reported to decrease in some inflammatory bowel diseases such as ulcerative colitis, especially in the active period, and that it could be used for determination of the disease activity [25], [26]. This condition is thought to have been related to the release of bioactive molecules of pro-inflammatory active platelets in the presence of inflammation. Also, numerous studies have been evaluated the role of platelet indexes such as MPV and PDW in acute appendicitis. In this regard, Boshnak et al., showed that Increased PDW combined with elevated white blood cells and neutrophil counts might be used as diagnostic tests in the cases of acute appendicitis, while MPV and RDW levels were not useful diagnostic markers, while studies are not in consist with each other [27].

Our results showed that the mean MPV was significantly higher in acute appendicitis in comparison to perforated appendicitis as well as acute gangrenous appendicitis. Besides, current study demonstrated that the mean PDW was significantly higher in acute appendicitis in comparison to perforated appendicitis and acute gangrenous appendicitis. In contrast, Arian Nia et al. found no association between MPV and final diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children between the ages of 1 and 15 years; and also, they suggested that the MPV is not an effective index in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and cannot be involved as a reliable index in making decision. However, Bilici et al. found that the mean MPV was found to be lower than normal in 48 cases in the acute appendicitis group (MPV = 7.55) [28]. However, the study by Uyanik et al. supports the findings which are in contrast with our study. They found that the mean MPV was 7.9 in the appendicitis group and 7.7 in the control group and that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups [29]. Interestingly, MPV in Erdem et al., study was 7.4 in the appendicitis group and 9.1 in the control group [30]. Similarly, Fan et al. reported that the MPV value in gangrenous appendicitis group was significantly lower than in the controls group [31].

Although numerous studies have been reported the effectiveness of PDW and MPV in diagnosis of various types of appendicitis, few reports have been conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of platelet indexes for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In this regard, MPV was evaluated by Bilici et al., [28]. In the recent mentioned study, the specificity was determined as 54%, and sensitivity was found as 87% for the decrease in MPV (< 7.4 fL). The current project indicated that PDW < 10.05 had a sensitivity of 35% and specificity of 75%, platelet count < 229500 had a sensitivity of 24% and specificity of 75% and 1/MPV < 0.1058 had a sensitivity of 35% and specificity of 75%. Furthermore, our results indicated that MPV < 8.95 had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 71% and 1 / PDW < 229500 had a sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 76%.

Finally, the results obtained from this study showed a significant negative correlation between acute appendicitis and PDW and also the platelet count. However, our results revealed that there was a significant positive correlation between acute appendicitis and MPV. Moreover, it was shown that perforated appendicitis had a significant negative correlation with MPV. Finally, analysis results revealed a significant positive correlation between acute gangrenous appendicitis and PDW and a significant negative correlation between this type of appendicitis and MPV.

In conclusion, our study suggested that platelet indexes such as MPV and PDW could significantly correlate with acute appendicitis in pediatric patients. Hence, we believe that both MPV and PDW could use as a simple and low-cost lab test for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Also, this study revealed that the MPV lower than 8.95 could be a novel index for diagnosing acute appendicitis with sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 71%.

Footnotes

Funding: This research did not receive any financial support

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist

References

  • 1.Almaramhy HH. Acute appendicitis in young children less than 5 years. Italian journal of pediatrics. 2017;43(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0335-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-017-0335-2 PMid:28257658 PMCid:PMC5347837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coward S, Kareemi H, Clement F, Zimmer S, Dixon E, Ball CG, Heitman SJ, Swain M, Ghosh S, Kaplan GG. Incidence of appendicitis over time:a comparative analysis of an administrative healthcare database and a pathology-proven appendicitis registry. PloS one. 2016;11(11):e0165161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165161 PMid:27820826 PMCid:PMC5098829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Almström M, Svensson J, Svenningsson A, Hagel E, Wester T. Population-based cohort study on the epidemiology of acute appendicitis in children in Sweden in 1987-2013. BJS open. 2018;2(3):142–150. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.52 PMid:29951638 PMCid:PMC5989972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wray CJ, Kao LS, Millas SG, Tsao K, Ko TC. Acute appendicitis:controversies in diagnosis and management. Curr Probl Surg. 2013;50(2):54–86. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2012.10.001. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2012.10.001 PMid:23374326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stringer MD. Acute appendicitis. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2017;53(11):1071–1076. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13737. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13737 PMid:29044790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Teo AT, Lefter LP, Zarrouk AJ, Merrett ND. Institutional review of patients presenting with suspected appendicitis. ANZ journal of surgery. 2015;85(6):420–4. doi: 10.1111/ans.12531. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12531 PMid:24640953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raveenthiran V. Neonatal appendicitis (part 1):a review of 52 cases with abdominal manifestation. Journal of neonatal surgery. 2015;4(1) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shogilev DJ, Duus N, Odom SR, Shapiro NI. Diagnosing appendicitis:evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014;15(7):859. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21568. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21568 PMid:25493136 PMCid:PMC4251237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kabir SA, Kabir SI, Sun R, Jafferbhoy S, Karim A. How to diagnose an acutely inflamed appendix;a systematic review of the latest evidence. International Journal of Surgery. 2017;40:155–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.013 PMid:28279749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ceresoli M, Zucchi A, Allievi N, Harbi A, Pisano M, Montori G, Heyer A, Nita GE, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F. Acute appendicitis:Epidemiology, treatment and outcomes-analysis of 16544 consecutive cases. World journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2016;8(10):693. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.693. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.693 PMid:27830041 PMCid:PMC5081551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Drapkin Z, Dunnick J, Madsen TE, Bryce M, Schunk JE. Pediatric Appendicitis:Association of Chief Complaint With Missed Appendicitis. Pediatric emergency care. 2018 doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001390. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001390 PMid:29324631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bonadio W, Brazg J, Telt N, Pe M, Doss F, Dancy L, Alvarado M. Impact of in-hospital timing to appendectomy on perforation rates in children with appendicitis. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2015 Nov 1;49(5):597–604. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.04.009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.04.009 PMid:26166465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cheong LH, Emil S. Outcomes of pediatric appendicitis:an international comparison of the United States and Canada. JAMA surgery. 2014;149(1):50–5. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2517. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2517 PMid:24257904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Elangovan S. Clinical and laboratory findings in acute appendicitis in the elderly. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1996;9(2):75–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kharbanda AB, Cosme Y, Liu K, Spitalnik SL, Dayan PS. Discriminative accuracy of novel and traditional biomarkers in children with suspected appendicitis adjusted for duration of abdominal pain. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2011;18(6):567–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01095.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01095.x PMid:21676053 PMCid:PMC3117273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gardikis S, Giatromanolaki A, Kambouri K, Tripsianis G, Sivridis E, Vaos G. Acute appendicitis in preschoolers:a study of two different populations of children. Italian journal of pediatrics. 2011;37(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-37-35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-37-35 PMid:21787396 PMCid:PMC3151210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aslanabadi S, Maghsoodi H, Ghare-Daghi A, Ghasemi B, Mofidi M, Yousef-Nezhad O. Diagnostic value of WBC count and C-reactive protein for detection of acute appendicitis in children. The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. 2010;14(1):49–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mehrabi A, Golriz M, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O, Probst P, Fonouni H, Mohammadi S, Weiss KH, Büchler MW. Meta-analysis of the prognostic role of perioperative platelet count in posthepatectomy liver failure and mortality. British Journal of Surgery. 2018;105(10):1254–61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10906. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10906 PMid:29999190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bath PM, Butterworth RJ. Platelet size:measurement, physiology and vascular disease. Blood coagulation &fibrinolysis:an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis. 1996;7(2):157–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001721-199603000-00011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bath P, Algert C, Chapman N, Neal B. Association of mean platelet volume with risk of stroke among 3134 individuals with history of cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 2004;35(3):622–6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000116105.26237.EC. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000116105.26237.EC PMid:14976328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van der Loo B, Martin JF. 6 Megakaryocytes and platelets in vascular disease. Bailliere's clinical haematology. 1997 Feb 1;10(1):109–23. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3536(97)80053-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3536(97)80053-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chatterji AK, Lynch EC, Garg SK, Amorosi EL, Karpatkin S. Circulating large platelets. The New England journal of medicine. 1971;284(25):1440. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197106242842517. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197106242842517 PMid:5103753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Canpolat FE, Yurdakök M, Armangil D, Yiğit Ş. Mean platelet volume in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics International. 2009;51(2):314–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02820.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02820.x PMid:19379270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Endler G, Klimesch A, Sunder-Plassmann H, Schillinger M, Exner M, Mannhalter C, Jordanova N, Christ G, Thalhammer R, Huber K, Sunder-Plassmann R. Mean platelet volume is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction but not for coronary artery disease. British journal of haematology. 2002;117(2):399–404. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03441.x. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03441.x PMid:11972524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yüksel O, Helvacı K, BaŞar Ö, Köklü S, Caner S, Helvacı N, Abaylı E, Altıparmak E. An overlooked indicator of disease activity in ulcerative colitis:mean platelet volume. Platelets. 2009;20(4):277–81. doi: 10.1080/09537100902856781. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537100902856781 PMid:19459134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kapsoritakis AN, Koukourakis MI, Sfiridaki A, Potamianos SP, Kosmadaki MG, Koutroubakis IE, Kouroumalis EA. Mean platelet volume:a useful marker of inflammatory bowel disease activity. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2001;96(3):776–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03621.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03621.x PMid:11280550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boshnak N, Boshnaq M, Elgohary H. Evaluation of platelet indices and red cell distribution width as new biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 2018;31(2):121–9. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1284964. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2017.1284964 PMid:28635513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bilici S, Sekmenli T, Göksu M, Melek M, Avci V. Mean platelet volume in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. African health sciences. 2011;11(3) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Uyanik B, Kavalci C, Arslan ED, Yilmaz F, Aslan O, Dede S, Bakir F. Role of mean platelet volume in diagnosis of childhood acute appendicitis. Emergency medicine international. 2012:2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/823095. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/823095 PMid:22970376 PMCid:PMC3434375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Erdem H, Aktimur R, Cetinkunar S, Reyhan E, Gokler C, Irkorucu O, Sozen S. Evaluation of mean platelet volume as a diagnostic biomarker in acute appendicitis. International journal of clinical and experimental medicine. 2015;8(1):1291. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fan Z, Pan J, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhu M, Yang B, Shi L, Jing H. Mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width as markers in the diagnosis of acute gangrenous appendicitis. Disease markers. 2015:2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/542013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/542013 PMid:26688600PMCid:PMC4673334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Scientific Foundation SPIROSKI

RESOURCES