ABSTRACT
The intestine is the primary reservoir of Candida albicans that can cause systemic infections in immunocompromised patients. In this reservoir, the fungus exists as a harmless commensal. However, antibiotic treatment can disturb the bacterial microbiota, facilitating fungal overgrowth and favoring pathogenicity. The current in vitro gut models that are used to study the pathogenesis of C. albicans investigate the state in which C. albicans behaves as a pathogen rather than as a commensal. We present a novel in vitro gut model in which the fungal pathogenicity is reduced to a minimum by increasing the biological complexity. In this model, enterocytes represent the epithelial barrier and goblet cells limit C. albicans adhesion and invasion. Significant protection against C. albicans-induced necrotic damage was achieved by the introduction of a microbiota of antagonistic lactobacilli. We demonstrated a time-, dose- and species-dependent protective effect against C. albicans-induced cytotoxicity. This required bacterial growth, which relied on the presence of host cells, but was not dependent on the competition for adhesion sites. Lactobacillus rhamnosus reduced hyphal elongation, a key virulence attribute. Furthermore, bacterial-driven shedding of hyphae from the epithelial surface, associated with apoptotic epithelial cells, was identified as a main and novel mechanism of damage protection. However, host cell apoptosis was not the driving mechanism behind shedding. Collectively, we established an in vitro gut model that can be used to experimentally dissect commensal-like interactions of C. albicans with a bacterial microbiota and the host epithelial barrier. We also discovered fungal shedding as a novel mechanism by which bacteria contribute to the protection of epithelial surfaces.
This article has an associated First Person interview with the joint first authors of the paper.
KEY WORDS: Candida albicans, Microbiota, Commensalism, Lactobacilli, Antagonism, In vitro model
Editor's choice: Using antagonistic lactobacilli, C. albicans pathogenicity was reduced to a minimum in an in vitro gut model consisting of enterocytes and goblet cells.
INTRODUCTION
The gut epithelium is a barrier between the sterile host environment and gut microbiota. Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) represent the first line of defense against microbial invasion by being a passive physical barrier that prevents translocation (Peterson and Artis, 2014). In addition, goblet cells within the intestinal epithelium produce a protective mucus layer (Maynard et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013). This layer serves as an anchor for the attachment of microbes and represents a nutrient source for mutualistic bacteria living within the gut (Cockburn and Koropatkin, 2016) that produce metabolites, nourishing IECs (Maynard et al., 2012). The gut microbiota is crucial for the development and maintenance of mucosal host defense by improving the physical barrier, competition for nutrients and adhesion sites with potential pathogens, and by developing the immune system (Sekirov et al., 2010; Bischoff et al., 2014). However, when the balance of the microbiota is impaired, opportunistic pathogens may outgrow the beneficial microbiota. The host's immune system and a functional intestinal barrier are generally sufficient to prevent infection. However, cytostatic therapy for the treatment of cancer targets fast-dividing cells. As a result, not only malignant cells are targeted, but also cells of the immune system and intestinal epithelial lining. In this immunocompromised state, patients are predisposed to develop opportunistic infections with otherwise harmless commensals of the microbiota. For example, the yeast Candida albicans exists as a commensal in the gastrointestinal tract of approximately 50% of the western population (Bougnoux et al., 2006), but can cause severe systemic infections under certain predisposing factors. Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and a compromised immune status are such factors that can lead to C. albicans overgrowth and a switch from commensalism to pathogenicity (Bassetti et al., 2011; Mason et al., 2012), potentially resulting in translocation through the intestinal barrier and disseminated infections (Koh et al., 2008). Indeed, the main reservoir of C. albicans that causes systemic candidiasis is the gut (Gouba and Drancourt, 2015; Miranda et al., 2009; Nucci and Anaissie, 2001).
The association between candidiasis and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is believed to relate to the eradication of bacteria that antagonize C. albicans pathogenicity. Although numerous bacterial species interact with C. albicans (Bamford et al., 2009; Cruz et al., 2013; Fan et al., 2015; Förster et al., 2016), Lactobacillus species are the most widely known for their antagonistic potential. Most studies that aimed at investigating the mechanisms by which lactobacilli can counteract C. albicans were performed in host-free environments (Köhler et al., 2012; Strus et al., 2005) or on human (vaginal, oral or cervical) epithelial cells (do Carmo et al., 2016; Donnarumma et al., 2014; Mailänder-Sánchez et al., 2017; Rizzo et al., 2013). Lactobacilli have been shown to counteract C. albicans through inhibition of fungal growth (Coman et al., 2015; de Barros et al., 2018; Hasslöf et al., 2010; Köhler et al., 2012; Ribeiro et al., 2017; Strus et al., 2005), inhibition of hyphal morphogenesis (Allonsius et al., 2019), prevention of adhesion (Donnarumma et al., 2014; Mailänder-Sánchez et al., 2017; Rizzo et al., 2013), competition for nutrients (Mailänder-Sánchez et al., 2017) or by influencing immune responses (Marranzino et al., 2012; Plantinga et al., 2012; Rizzo et al., 2013). Among other lactobacilli, L. rhamnosus can reduce C. albicans hyphal induction and biofilm formation via cell-cell interactions and the secretion of exometabolites (James et al., 2016; Matsubara et al., 2016a). Exopolysaccharides of L. rhamnosus GG interfere with hyphal formation and adhesion to vaginal and bronchial epithelial cells (Allonsius et al., 2017). L. rhamnosus GG also protects oral epithelial cells against C. albicans-induced damage by competing for adhesion sites as well as depleting nutrients (Mailänder-Sánchez et al., 2017). Furthermore, lactobacilli can produce compounds such as hydrogen peroxide, lactic acid, bacteriocins and biosurfactants, which inhibit the growth of potential pathogens (reviewed by Förster et al., 2016 and Matsubara et al., 2016b). The importance of the microbiota in preventing damage to epithelial cells by C. albicans is demonstrated by the fact that any epithelial cell layer exposed to C. albicans in vitro is rapidly and efficiently invaded and damaged via necrotic cell death and unable to prevent translocation in the absence of a microbiota (Allert et al., 2018).
Here, we studied whether we could achieve a ‘commensal’ model in which the gut epithelial barrier is subjected to minimal C. albicans-induced damage and translocation by increasing biological complexity. Using a model consisting of intestinal epithelial cells, mucus-producing goblet cells and lactobacilli, we investigated how lactobacilli antagonize C. albicans-induced necrotic cytotoxicity.
RESULTS
C. albicans-induced epithelial damage is reduced by colonization with Lactobacillus species
Our study aimed to establish an in vitro model, which mimics the commensal phase of C. albicans in the gut, in order to dissect commensal-like scenarios. First, we reduced C. albicans-induced damage to a minimum by manipulating the composition of the epithelial barrier. As mucus can dampen virulence attributes of C. albicans (Kavanaugh et al., 2014), the mucus-producing goblet cell line HT29-MTX, which has been extensively validated for compatibility and functional properties with C2BBe1 enterocytes (Ferraretto et al., 2018), was introduced in an existing model for Candida-gut translocation (Allert et al., 2018). In comparison to C2BBe1 enterocytes alone, the presence of HT29-MTX cells, at a ratio of 70:30 respectively, reduced adhesion and translocation of C. albicans by approximately 30% (Fig. 1A,B). However, the potential for C. albicans necrotic cell damage, as determined by the concentration of epithelial cytosolic lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the culture supernatants (Chan et al., 2013), as well as C. albicans’ hyphal length, remained comparable to the C2BBe1 monoculture model (Fig. 1C,D).
To introduce another level of complexity, an artificial ‘microbiota’ was included. Various Lactobacillus species with known Candida-antagonizing potential were investigated for their impact on C. albicans pathogenicity. The gut model was either colonized (pre-incubated; Pre-Inc.) with lactobacilli overnight followed by fungal infection or simultaneously colonized during C. albicans infection (w/o Pre-Inc.) (Fig. 1E). Colonization with Lactobacillus species alone did not induce necrotic epithelial cell damage (Fig. 1F). However, colonization with L. paracasei, L. rhamnosus, L. salivarius or L. casei before C. albicans infection reduced C. albicans-induced necrotic cytotoxicity (Fig. 1F). Colonization with L. fermentum and L. brevis or simultaneous colonization of lactobacilli with C. albicans infection did not influence Candida-induced damage. As lactobacilli were successful in protecting the epithelial barrier, we systematically investigated the factors that might contribute to this effect.
Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection is dose-, time- and species dependent
When colonized during C. albicans infection, L. rhamnosus dose-dependently reduced damage (Fig. 2A). A 250-fold excess of bacteria to Candida cells decreased LDH release almost to the degree of uninfected epithelial cells, yet colonization of IECs before C. albicans infection required significantly lower numbers of bacteria (5- to 50-fold excess of bacterial cells) to achieve damage protection. This may be because of the capacity of L. rhamnosus to multiply during colonization (Fig. 2B), meaning that a 50-fold excess of bacterial cells is sufficient to reduce C. albicans-induced damage when time for replication is given and the bacterium is able to grow on host cells. Conversely, the inability of L. fermentum and L. brevis to protect against Candida-induced damage (Fig. 1F) correlated with their inability to replicate in the model (Fig. 2B). Therefore, Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection relies on the ability of the bacteria to proliferate and an interaction of a high quantity of bacteria with C. albicans. In subsequent experiments, colonization of 50 bacterial cells per yeast cell was used to study the protective effects mediated by lactobacilli.
Lactobacilli do not interfere with fungal adhesion, but suppress filamentation and translocation
Prerequisite processes for C. albicans pathogenicity are adhesion to host cells and a subsequent morphological transition from yeast to hyphae, enabling the fungus to invade host cells, cause damage and translocate across barriers (Allert et al., 2018; Dalle et al., 2010). Therefore, the impairment of C. albicans adhesion and/or filamentation could be a potential mechanism for damage protection by lactobacilli (Allonsius et al., 2017; Coman et al., 2015; Donnarumma et al., 2014; James et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2018; Niu et al., 2017; Parolin et al., 2015; Santos et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Although colonization of the model by Lactobacillus species did not interfere with C. albicans’ adhesion to IECs and hyphal formation per se (Fig. 2C), L. rhamnosus significantly reduced hyphal length (42% reduction in length) (Fig. 2D). L. brevis, as a less-protective Lactobacillus species, did not reduce hyphal length. Interestingly, lactobacilli only grew in the host cell culture medium when host cells were present. Therefore, they did not reach the necessary number of bacterial cells to gain influence on fungal filamentation in the absence of host cells. As a result, Lactobacillus-mediated protection relied on host cells to sustain bacterial growth. The reduced C. albicans filamentation in the presence of L. rhamnosus was accompanied by reduced translocation (Fig. 2E). Consequently, L. brevis, which did not reduce filamentation, also failed to reduce C. albicans translocation.
Despite reduced hyphal length and translocation, a loss of epithelial barrier integrity [quantified via measurement of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER)] was observed in both scenarios: C. albicans single infection and when the model was colonized with L. rhamnosus (Fig. 2F). Even L. rhamnosus alone decreased epithelial integrity after 24 h of colonization. C. albicans-induced loss of epithelial integrity is accompanied by decreasing epithelial E-cadherin (CDH1) levels induced by increasing levels of µ-calpain (CAPN1), a proteolytic enzyme that targets E-cadherin (Rouabhia et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2016). E-cadherin degradation was observed when IECs were infected with C. albicans for at least 12 h (Fig. 2G). Although L. rhamnosus reduced fungal translocation, E-cadherin breakdown still occurred. Nevertheless, stable E-cadherin levels during L. rhamnosus colonization indicate that the bacteria do not affect the epithelial E-cadherin level.
Damage protection by lactobacilli is associated with reduced IEC damage and stress response
For oral, vaginal and intestinal epithelial cells, Candida-induced damage correlates with the induction of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and NF-κB responses (Böhringer et al., 2016; Moyes et al., 2011, 2010). Therefore, key mediators of this ‘danger’ response were assessed for their activation during the Lactobacillus-Candida interaction on IECs.
The cFOS gene, which encodes a subunit of the heterodimeric transcription factor AP-1, was highly expressed in IECs 12 h after Candida infection (Fig. 3A). The dual-specificity phosphatases are primary targets of AP-1 (Patterson et al., 2009) and inactivate stress-related MAPKs such as p38, ERK and JNK. This provides a negative feedback on MAPK activation. The DUSP1 and DUSP5 genes, encoding two of these phosphatases, were upregulated by C. albicans infection (Fig. 3B,C). Activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway induces expression of several NF-κB transcriptional target genes, including NFKB inhibitor alpha (NFKBIA), which functions as a negative feedback regulator of NF-κB activation (Jacobs and Harrison, 1998). NFKBIA gene expression was observed 12 h after Candida infection (Fig. 3D). L. rhamnosus colonization alone or combined with C. albicans infection resulted in a marginal induction of cFOS, DUSP1, DUSP5 and NFKBIA expression at early time points, but L. rhamnosus colonization before infection downregulated these genes at later stages of infection. These data indicate that L. rhamnosus, on a molecular level, counteracts the damage response to C. albicans.
Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection is independent of oxygen levels
As the gastrointestinal tract has distinct hypoxic niches, with low oxygen tension in the intestinal lumen and higher oxygen tension towards the crypts (Zheng et al., 2015), hypoxic conditions were applied to further work towards a model in which C. albicans exhibits a commensal-like co-existence. As lactobacilli preferably grow under anaerobic conditions, we speculated that hypoxia might augment Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection. A minimal oxygen level of 2% was selected, as lower levels reduced IEC viability. Compared to 21%, 2% oxygen diminished C. albicans-induced cytotoxicity by more than 50% (Fig. 4A). This correlated with reduced hyphal formation during hypoxia (Fig. 4B), which was further reduced when the model was colonized with L. rhamnosus. Protection against C. albicans-induced cytotoxicity was more pronounced in the presence of protective Lactobacillus species; however, not significantly different from damage protection at 21% oxygen. To further investigate the mechanism associated with Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection, experiments were continued at 21% oxygen.
Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection is contact-dependent
To determine whether damage protection was mediated by secreted bacterial compounds (James et al., 2016; Parolin et al., 2015; Santos et al., 2018; Tan et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017), we analyzed the ability of L. rhamnosus to counteract C. albicans-induced cytotoxicity in a contact-independent manner. Supernatants (SN) from Lactobacillus-colonized gut models (Pre-Inc. SN) were unable to reduce Candida-mediated epithelial damage, whereas supernatants from Lactobacillus grown in MRS broth (MRS-SN) resulted in a trend of reduced damage (Fig. 5A). Supernatants obtained after Lactobacillus colonization or after 24 h of infection also did not influence hyphal length (Fig. 5B).
Full damage protection requires viable lactobacilli
As high numbers of bacteria mediated protection against C. albicans-induced damage (Fig. 2A), we investigated whether L. rhamnosus needs to be alive and metabolically active or whether just sheer biomass and physical presence are sufficient to exert its protective effect. Neither heat- nor formaldehyde-killed lactobacilli were able to reduce Candida-mediated damage (Fig. 5C). As killed bacteria do not multiply on host cells, they may not reach the required biomass. Therefore, simultaneous infections of C. albicans with increasing numbers of killed lactobacilli were performed (Fig. 5D). Only extremely high numbers [multiplicity of infection (MOI) 500] of killed L. rhamnosus demonstrated a trend towards damage protection. However, even L. brevis, which did not mediate damage protection in other assays, induced a similar damage reduction at such high numbers. This indicates that the protection observed at these concentrations is likely due to different mechanisms from those of viable bacteria at lower numbers. Supporting this, viable L. rhamnosus cells at the same inoculum achieved almost 100% damage protection.
Exopolysaccharides of L. rhamnosus are not involved in damage protection
Protection against C. albicans pathogenicity by lactobacilli was previously attributed to the presence of exopolysaccharides of the outer carbohydrate layer of L. rhamnosus GG (Allonsius et al., 2017). However, exopolysaccharide-deficient L. rhamnosus inhibited C. albicans-induced cytotoxicity to the same extent as wild-type L. rhamnosus (Fig. S2).
Glucose consumption and lactate production are not responsible for Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection
Previous studies suggested that glucose consumption and lactate production by lactobacilli may be critical for the reduction of fungal damage potential (Hasslöf et al., 2010; Hütt et al., 2016; Köhler et al., 2012; Mailänder-Sánchez et al., 2017).
Although glucose levels dropped slowly when the model remained uninfected or was colonized with L. brevis, glucose was consumed within 12 h during C. albicans infection (Fig. 6A). Colonization with L. rhamnosus (in the presence or absence of C. albicans infection) already led to increased glucose consumption within the first 6 h of the experiment (Fig. 6A). As rapid glucose consumption is a mechanism by which C. albicans can cause damage to macrophages (Tucey et al., 2018), we speculated that the reduced glucose levels caused by L. rhamnosus might affect the potential of C. albicans to cause damage. However, when glucose was supplemented after colonization with lactobacilli, to compensate for the reduced glucose levels, no effect on L. rhamnosus-mediated damage protection was observed (Fig. 6B).
Lactate levels slowly increased in all conditions, but this effect was significantly enhanced by colonization with L. rhamnosus (Fig. 6C). As lactate was previously described to be a key mediator of Lactobacillus protection (Buffo et al., 1984; Hasslöf et al., 2010; Hütt et al., 2016; Köhler et al., 2012; Maudsdotter et al., 2011; Noverr and Huffnagle, 2004), we validated whether lactate itself affected filamentation of C. albicans in the medium used in our model. The influence of lactate on the extracellular pH was excluded in our model by buffering the cell culture medium, an essential requirement for the fitness of the intestinal cells. Increasing lactate concentrations in this setting did not affect hyphal length (Fig. 6D). In addition, lactate supplementation did not induce damage protection (Fig. 6E).
Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection involves the shedding of C. albicans
In order to invade and damage epithelial cells, C. albicans requires physical contact with the cells (Dalle et al., 2010; Wächtler et al., 2011). As we did not observe an influence of lactobacilli on adhesion of C. albicans, we speculated that damage protection could involve displacement of already bound fungal cells. Therefore, we performed displacement assays in which C. albicans was used to infect the model and, subsequently, viable lactobacilli were added 1, 3 or 6 h post-infection (Fig. 7A). The more bacterial cells were added, the stronger the damage was reduced. In addition, the longer the inoculation of lactobacilli was delayed, the less protection was achieved. Still, L. rhamnosus added 6 h after C. albicans infection reduced host cell damage by 60% at the highest inoculum, compared to 90% reduction when added 1 h post-infection.
An accumulation of debris was observed in the supernatant at later stages of infection, with more macroscopically observable debris when the model was colonized by L. rhamnosus (Fig. 7B). Thus, we quantified and analyzed the localization of lactobacilli and C. albicans cells during infection (Fig. 7C-G). The most substantial fraction of L. rhamnosus colony forming units (CFUs) was retrieved from the culture supernatant (Fig. 7C), and 1 h post-infection the number of CFUs doubled compared to the starting inoculum. Nevertheless, L. rhamnosus CFUs continued to increase drastically during C. albicans infection to almost 200-fold the initial inoculum (Fig. 7D). L. brevis appeared to be more localized at the epithelial barrier (Fig. 7C) and did not proliferate during the course of infection (Fig. 7D).
On the fungal side, independent of lactobacilli colonization, approximately half of the fungi were present in the supernatant 1 h post-infection, whereas the other half were localized within or attached to the epithelial barrier (Fig. 7E). During the course of infection, increasing percentages of fungi were associated with the gut epithelium layer over time, with 99% of fungal cells attached to host cells after 24 h (Fig. 7E). Colonization of the model with L. rhamnosus caused slightly decreased fungal association with the gut epithelial barrier over time, but 24 h post-infection the majority of fungal cells (62%) were found to be in the supernatant (Fig. 7E). Similar numbers were observed with gut models consisting of only C2BBe1 cells. Thus, this shedding was independent of the presence of HT29-MTX mucus-secreting goblet cells (Fig. 7F). In line with this, L. rhamnosus colonization also did not significantly influence gene expression or protein levels of mucin genes known to be expressed by intestinal tissue (Fig. S3). In terms of absolute numbers, C. albicans CFUs significantly increased at 24 h post-infection, yet colonization with L. rhamnosus also prevented C. albicans outgrowth and kept the number of viable fungi constant during the course of infection (Fig. 7G).
Lactobacilli induce aggregation of C. albicans hyphae, bacteria and host cells
To investigate the cell-cell interactions in our model, we visualized the aggregation potential of microbial species to either themselves (auto-aggregation) or each other (co-aggregation) using scanning electron microscopy. Aggregation of both Lactobacillus species with C. albicans was observed (Fig. 7H-M). Six hours after infection of colonized IECs, almost all C. albicans hyphae were covered with L. brevis cells (Fig. 7H). Interestingly, bacterial cells were only found in contact with fungal cells; they did not adhere to host cells. L. rhamnosus formed large masses via auto-aggregation, which also stuck to C. albicans hyphae (Fig. 7K-M) and were rarely found on host cell layers.
Shedding of C. albicans is associated with host cell apoptosis
To maintain tissue homeostasis, the intestinal epithelium induces apoptosis and shedding of senescent cells, while the renewal of cells conserves barrier integrity. As we observed that C. albicans is shed in association with apoptotic host cells, live-cell imaging was used to investigate the influence of L. rhamnosus on host cell apoptosis as determined by extracellular phosphatidylserine exposure stained with annexin-V (ANXA5; Fig. 8A,B) and caspase 3/7 (CASP3/7) activity (Fig. 8C). Although L. rhamnosus and L. brevis alone did not induce host cell apoptosis (Fig. 8A-C), C. albicans infection did induce host cell apoptosis 16 h post-infection to some degree; however, colonization with L. rhamnosus significantly increased this induction (Fig. 8A-C). With L. brevis, the induction of apoptosis was similar to that of C. albicans alone (Fig. 8C). To verify that apoptotic cells were localized within the shed material, caspase 3/7 activity of epithelial cells within this material was quantified. When L. rhamnosus was used to colonize the model, significantly more epithelial cells with caspase 3/7 activity were observed in the shed material (Fig. 8D). To elucidate whether increased apoptosis in the presence of L. rhamnosus was a prerequisite for shedding, apoptosis was inhibited. Despite efficient inhibition of apoptosis through a selective caspase 3/7 inhibitor, no inhibition of shedding (Fig. 8E) or restoration of C. albicans-induced damage was observed (Fig. 8F).
DISCUSSION
Epithelial cells exposed to C. albicans in vitro are rapidly and severely damaged indicating a high pathogenic potential in this in vitro context (Allert et al., 2018; Dalle et al., 2010; Wächtler et al., 2011). Here, we established a novel in vitro gut model in which we systematically explored the mechanisms that can prevent pathogenicity and help to achieve a commensal state. The inclusion of mucus-producing goblet cells reduced the adhesion of C. albicans to the epithelial barrier and its translocation, but not damage or hyphal length. To achieve protection against damage, a protective artificial ‘microbiota’ in the form of Lactobacillus species with Candida-antagonizing potential needed to be co-cultured in the model. The presence of these live bacteria prevented C. albicans overgrowth and caused shedding of C. albicans from the host cells in a contact-dependent manner, which temporally correlated with increased host cell apoptosis. However, apoptosis was not required for Lactobacillus-induced shedding and protection against C. albicans-mediated damage. Although less potent than the presence of a protective microbiota, hypoxia also reduced C. albicans-mediated damage. Still, the antagonistic potential of L. rhamnosus was not augmented by hypoxic conditions. In this three-partite gut model of intestinal epithelial cells, a bacterial member of the gut microbiota and C. albicans, the pathogenic potential of C. albicans could be reduced.
Current in vitro models used to study C. albicans pathogenicity mostly rely on a monoculture of epithelial cells (Allert et al., 2018; Donnarumma et al., 2014; Mailänder-Sánchez et al., 2017; Rizzo et al., 2013). Here, a mixture of enterocytes and mucus-producing goblet cells was used to more closely mimic the intestinal epithelium (Beduneau et al., 2014; Ferraretto et al., 2018). Using this setup, adhesion and translocation of C. albicans were decreased, presumably owing to the presence of mucus. Nevertheless, epithelial damage as well as hyphal length remained unchanged. Therefore, an additional level of complexity was introduced in the form of an artificial microbiota. As microbiota, Lactobacillus species were selected for several reasons. First, they are found throughout the gastrointestinal tract of healthy humans (Finegold et al., 1977). Second, they are not pathogens themselves or fast-growing and, therefore, do not pose a threat to the epithelial cells. Third, they are widely described to have antagonistic properties against C. albicans (reviewed by Matsubara et al., 2016a and Förster et al., 2016). Fourth, Lactobacillus species are the most widely used probiotics to prevent or treat Candida-infections in clinical trials. C. albicans colonization of preterm neonates treated with probiotic L. rhamnosus was reduced (Manzoni et al., 2006). Furthermore, L. reuteri colonization was as effective as antifungal Nystatin prophylaxis in this patient group (Oncel et al., 2015) and can reduce late-onset sepsis (Romeo et al., 2011). A mixture of different Lactobacillus spp. strains, Bifidobacterium spp., and Saccharomyces spp. reduced gastrointestinal C. albicans colonization as well as candiduria as a result of disseminated infections in critically ill children receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics (Kumar et al., 2013). Of note, clinical data are limited on the use of probiotics in immunocompromised patients treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, the major risk group for systemic candidiasis. Yet, despite the extensive evidence that lactobacilli antagonize C. albicans, direct interactions on mucosal surfaces mimicking the gastrointestinal tract have not been described.
Out of six tested Lactobacillus species, L. rhamnosus, L. paracasei, L. casei and L. salivarius were capable of preventing C. albicans-induced cytotoxicity. Antifungal activity for these Lactobacillus species was also described in Allonsius et al. (2019). For a more in-depth analysis of the reduced damage, protective L. rhamnosus was compared with the less protective species L. brevis. The reduced damage following L. rhamnosus colonization correlated with reduced hyphal elongation, fungal translocation and shedding of fungal filaments in conglomerates consisting of apoptotic host cells, hyphae and bacteria. Reduced induction of damage- and stress-related host responses (MAPK and NF-κB signaling), which were previously shown to be part of the damage response to C. albicans in epithelial cells (Moyes et al., 2010), validated the improved condition of the epithelial barrier on a molecular level.
Many studies demonstrated that Lactobacillus supernatants restrict growth, yeast-to-hyphal-transition and biofilm formation (James et al., 2016; Parolin et al., 2015; Santos et al., 2018; Tan et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). In contrast, we observed that damage protection exerted by L. rhamnosus was contact dependent. Of note, these studies used a variety of Lactobacillus strains, and the production of antimicrobial metabolites is highly strain specific. In agreement with Felten et al. (1999), who showed that L. rhamnosus is not an H2O2 producer, no hydrogen peroxide production was detected for any of the Lactobacillus species tested in our study (data not shown). Likewise, the production of biosurfactants and bacteriocins, which are anti-candidal and decrease adhesion and biofilm formation (Fracchia et al., 2010; Hütt et al., 2016; Kaewsrichan et al., 2006; Morais et al., 2017; Parolin et al., 2015; Strus et al., 2005; Zakaria Gomaa, 2013), played only a minor role, if any, in our study, as Lactobacillus supernatants did not reduce damage. Even though colonization of L. rhamnosus resulted in lactate accumulation, its supplementation at concentrations comparable to those in L. rhamnosus-colonized models did not inhibit C. albicans’ cytotoxicity or hyphal elongation. This can likely be attributed to the buffered KBM cell culture medium (required to keep the epithelial cells healthy in our model), which kept the pH neutral throughout the experiment and thus dampened any potential antimicrobial effect of lactic acid shown in other studies at acidic pH (Buffo et al., 1984; Hasslöf et al., 2010; Hütt et al., 2016; Köhler et al., 2012; Maudsdotter et al., 2011). Nevertheless, acidification via lactate production may contribute to protection against C. albicans pathogenicity in vivo. However, our data suggest the necessity of physical interaction between L. rhamnosus and C. albicans for damage protection in the setting of our gut model.
A crucial aspect of our study is the observation that live L. rhamnosus cells are required for reduced C. albicans pathogenicity. Nevertheless, an extreme biomass of killed bacteria, even the non-protective L. brevis strain, mediated protection. The four protective Lactobacillus species (L. rhamnosus, L. paracasei, L. casei and L. salivarius) proliferated on host cells. Thus, overnight colonization of a low bacterial cell number yielded the required protective biomass. As L. brevis and L. fermentum did not grow under the given conditions, the two species are only protective at higher inocula, as shown in simultaneous infections and displacement experiments. This means that the ability to replicate during colonization before infection with C. albicans distinguishes the protective from less-protective Lactobacillus species. In other words, the reduced growth of L. brevis and L. fermentum in our model appears to be the key reason why these species have a limited protective potential, as they otherwise have similar attributes to the protective species. Interestingly, the growth of lactobacilli required the presence of host cells, as growth in KBM medium alone was not observed for any species. Adhesion to mucin-coated surfaces can shift lactobacilli to a more protease-active phenotype, thereby degrading mucin as a nutrient source for the bacteria (Wickström et al., 2013). Another possibility is the formation of hypoxic microniches when intestinal cells are present, resulting in the growth of microaerophilic bacteria that can bear oxygen, but prefer environments containing lower levels of oxygen for growth. L. rhamnosus even showed increased proliferation during C. albicans infection, which could suggest that C. albicans may additionally support Lactobacillus growth. A potential explanation could be hypoxic microniches that are formed by metabolically active C. albicans hyphae (Lambooij et al., 2017). The Lactobacillus species used in the study differ in their ability to utilize environmental conditions for replication. Reaching a critical biomass of ∼200 bacteria per C. albicans cell was indispensable for Lactobacillus-mediated inhibition of C. albicans. Our data show a significant expansion of the L. rhamnosus population during colonization and over the course of infection, which easily reaches this biomass of viable bacteria. Nevertheless, killed L. rhamnosus, and even L. brevis, reduced fungal-induced damage to some extent, but not in a manner akin to viable bacteria. It is likely that steric hindrance influences the cytotoxicity of C. albicans. Incidentally, this was also observed when using killed C. albicans cells instead of killed bacteria (Fig. S4). Still, for potent damage protection, viable lactobacilli were essential.
It can only be speculated whether a ratio of 200:1 can be reached in patients treated with L. rhamnosus probiotics. Clearly, colonization of the gastrointestinal tract in the stomach, ileum and colon (Alander et al., 1997, 1999; Valeur et al., 2004) can be achieved. However, the extent of colonization by lactobacilli varies drastically between studies with various formulations, treatment regimens and colonization readouts (Alander et al., 1999; Piano et al., 2012; Valeur et al., 2004). Nevertheless, the studies mentioned above show that the current probiotic treatment strategies are efficient in pre-term neonates, though knowledge is lacking regarding the exact quantitative interactions in such clinical settings, as well as the effect in an adult patient population.
Scanning electron microscopy revealed the ability of L. rhamnosus to co-aggregate with fungal cells. Therefore, the bacteria may reside in microniches that enable close contact cell-cell interactions. Within such an interface, L. rhamnosus may form a hostile microenvironment that mediates anti-Candida activities. Antimicrobial factors (mentioned above) were likely produced by the lactobacilli in our study, but were ineffective in the supernatant, probably because such factors did not reach minimum inhibitory concentrations. However, the same factor may inhibit C. albicans when higher concentrations are achieved in microniches. The concentration of short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites may be even higher, whereas nutrient availability may be even lower within these niches. Competition for nutrients could be one explanation. In agreement with Mailänder-Sánchez et al. (2017), damage prevention in the presence of L. rhamnosus was accompanied by glucose depletion. Despite the deprivation of the primary carbon source of C. albicans, supplementation of glucose at levels similar to those amounts consumed by L. rhamnosus during the colonization phase did not restore C. albicans’ damage potential. However, we cannot exclude that nutrient competition in microniches within the bacteria–Candida interface may contribute to growth inhibition and shedding of C. albicans.
Several studies indicate an association between co-aggregation of protective bacteria with pathogens with the interference of adhesion to host cells. This involves bacterial surface molecules such as peptidoglycan, teichoic acids, (glyco)proteins and polysaccharides (Allonsius et al., 2017; Coman et al., 2015; Kang et al., 2018; Kleerebezem et al., 2010; Lebeer et al., 2012, 2010; Malik et al., 2016; Niu et al., 2017; Parolin et al., 2015; Santos et al., 2016; Zivkovic et al., 2015). In the case of IECs, we observed striking differences to data obtained in many other studies. For example, exopolysaccharides of L. rhamnosus GG were shown to interfere with hyphal formation and C. albicans adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells (Allonsius et al., 2017; Donnarumma et al., 2014). However, the presence of lactobacilli in our model did not influence the binding efficiency of the fungus. Accordingly, an exopolysaccharide-deficient L. rhamnosus GG mutant (Allonsius et al., 2017) conveyed protection to a similar extent as the wild type in our study. The fact that C. albicans adhesion remained unaffected in our model and the finding that exopolysaccharides were not involved in damage reduction suggests mechanisms different from those shown in other studies.
Filamentation is one of the most essential virulence attributes of C. albicans through which the fungus can invade tissue and is associated with cytotoxicity (Dalle et al., 2010; Gow et al., 2011; Höfs et al., 2016; Moyes et al., 2016). Lactobacilli-influenced hyphal length is potentially supported by the mucus-producing goblet cells (Allonsius et al., 2019; Kavanaugh et al., 2014) and likely contributes, in part, to the reduced cytotoxicity. However, we propose that the actual mode of action of Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection is likely inhibition of fungal overgrowth and shedding of fungal cells, which already takes place after 6 h of infection. After 24 h, the majority of Candida cells were located in the supernatants, spatially restricting fungal cells from host cells and preventing invasion and hyphal-associated damage of the epithelial cell layer. Indeed, the presence of L. rhamnosus reduced C. albicans translocation. To our knowledge, inhibition of adhesion was mainly studied on vaginal and oral epithelial cells (Allonsius et al., 2017; Mailänder-Sánchez et al., 2017). This means that beneficial effects of lactobacilli, which are often considered species- and even strain-specific, likely also depend on the epithelial environment within the human body.
Lactobacillus-induced mucus production correlates with the inhibition of attachment of various pathogens to epithelial surfaces (Hafez, 2012; Kim et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008; Zivkovic et al., 2015). This was also considered as a mechanism that could have contributed to the detachment and shedding of Candida hyphae. However, no influence of L. rhamnosus on mucin gene or protein expression was observed and it can, therefore, be assumed that an increased mucus production has little, if any, contribution to the detachment of C. albicans from Lactobacillus-colonized intestinal epithelial cells. Consistent with this, shedding was also induced in the absence of mucus-secreting goblet cells.
Besides protective mucus, the intestinal epithelium is known for its very high turnover rate. Enterocytes have a short lifetime and are continuously shed into the lumen of the gut, completely renewing the epithelium every 5-7 days. In humans, this daily loss has been estimated at 1011 cells (Potten, 1990). Fully differentiated intestinal epithelial cells experience detachment-induced, caspase-dependent apoptosis (a programmed cell death termed ‘anoikis’) (Beauséjour et al., 2012; Bullen et al., 2006; Patterson and Watson, 2017). This process is accompanied by perturbations of tight junctions, which are rapidly reassembled by neighboring cells to maintain barrier integrity (Guan et al., 2011; Williams et al., 2015). We observed that the shed Candida-bacteria aggregates contained host cells with apoptotic characteristics such as phosphatidylserine expression and caspase 3/7 activity. Furthermore, we observed that L. rhamnosus increased expression of apoptotic markers of epithelial cells, without increasing LDH release. Apoptotic cells, in contrast to necrotic cells, retain their membrane integrity (Zhang et al., 2018). Therefore, the observation of apoptotic markers in the absence of LDH release points towards induction of apoptosis by L. rhamnosus during infection with C. albicans. In the literature, contrasting results were described concerning Lactobacillus-mediated apoptosis induction. Some studies demonstrate the ability to prevent pathogen-induced apoptosis (Li et al., 2008; Santos et al., 2016), whereas others state the opposite (Sungur et al., 2017; Zielinska et al., 2018). Interestingly, the timing of the apoptosis induction coincided with the observed shedding. Nevertheless, blockade of apoptosis via inhibition of caspase 3/7 did not reduce shedding nor did it restore C. albicans-induced damage in the presence of L. rhamnosus. This could suggest that apoptosis might be a consequence of shedding rather than the mechanism causing it. We therefore propose that the L. rhamnosus-induced shedding of C. albicans hyphae may result in detachment of epithelial cells to which the hyphae are attached, resulting in induction of apoptosis due to a loss of anchorage.
Although phosphatidylserine exposure and caspase 3/7 activity were also observed during infection with C. albicans alone, this was paired with increased LDH release, suggesting predominantly necrotic cell death (Allert et al., 2018; Chan et al., 2013). Furthermore, the epithelial integrity measured by TEER showed a decrease when exposed to C. albicans alone. Allert et al. (2018) stated that loss of epithelial integrity and C. albicans-induced damage can be independent processes – meaning for the current study that colonization with L. rhamnosus can lead to TEER loss (presumably by shedding of apoptotic cells and renewal of the epithelial barrier) and a simultaneous inhibition of C. albicans translocation. Nevertheless, it remains unknown why TEER is reduced upon colonization of L. rhamnosus alone, as no induction of apoptosis was observed under these conditions. This reduction of TEER in the presence of L. rhamnosus contrasts the other protective effects imposed upon C. albicans pathogenicity. This also contrasts with previous studies demonstrating that Lactobacillus species can even improve barrier integrity (Barnett et al., 2018).
Although the molecular mechanism behind the shedding observed in this study remains unknown, it appears to be clear that this is the result of a tripartite interaction of bacteria, C. albicans and epithelial cells rather than due to dual interactions between two of the players in this model. Whether shedding is an exclusive feature of L. rhamnosus or is also induced by other Candida-antagonizing bacteria, remains to be investigated. Similarly, shedding may also be a protective feature of other epithelial tissues colonized by Candida-antagonizing bacteria. Even though supernatants of L. rhamnosus cultured within the model were not capable of inhibiting C. albicans pathogenicity, yet undiscovered metabolic interactions may play a role in Lactobacillus-mediated damage protection.
We are convinced that our model, which is to our knowledge the first in vitro gut model to mimic a more commensal (non-damaging) state of C. albicans, can provide crucial insights to understanding the interplay between host cells and microbiota in preventing pathogenicity. The analysis of C. albicans as a commensal using in vivo models is hampered by the fact that most laboratory animals (including mice) are not natural hosts of C. albicans and colonization requires germ-free animals or an antibiotic-induced dysbiosis (Fan et al., 2015; Koh, 2013; Naglik et al., 2008). The model developed here could facilitate the study of C. albicans commensalism and pathogenesis with human cells. Increasing our current knowledge on the commensal state of C. albicans is crucial to understand how it gained its pathogenic potential (Hube, 2004) and to explain biological effects observed in in vivo clinical trials, which, for example, showed the usefulness of lactobacilli for the prevention and treatment of vulvovaginal and oral candidiasis (Hatakka et al., 2007; Kumar et al., 2013; Manzoni et al., 2011, 2006; Martinez et al., 2009). We believe that our experimental model and refined future modifications, e.g. containing immune cells, for C. albicans commensalism can be widely applied for future studies investigating the interaction between C. albicans and other members of the microbiota in a more biologically relevant context.
Collectively, we established a commensal-like model to study C. albicans interactions in the presence of antagonistic Lactobacillus species and intestinal epithelial cells including mucus-producing goblet cells (Fig. S1). Mechanistically, these bacteria induce shedding of invading C. albicans in aggregates with bacteria and host cells, thereby spatially restricting C. albicans from the epithelial barrier. This novel in vitro model may provide a stepping stone for more complex models aimed at studying the commensal and pathogenic states of C. albicans and could serve as a tool to study novel therapies aiming at preventing C. albicans pathogenicity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Microbial strains and culture conditions
The C. albicans wild-type strain SC5314 was grown on YPD plates (2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, 2% glucose, 2% agar) at 30°C. For use in experiments, C. albicans cells were grown overnight (o/n) in YPD medium (2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, 2% glucose) at 30°C and 180 rpm in a shaker incubator. Before infection, yeast cells from an o/n culture were collected by centrifugation at 20,000 g and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cell number was determined using a Neubauer chamber system, and the concentration adjusted to 4×105 cells/ml in serum-free Keratinocyte Basal Medium (KBM, Lonza). For the killing of C. albicans, fungal cells were treated for 10 min at 70°C and the viability was proven by the absence of growth on YPD plates. Lactobacillus strains [L. brevis: ATCC, 14869; L. casei: ATCC, 393; L. fermentum: ATCC, 14931; L. paracasei: ATCC, 11578; L. rhamnosus: ATCC, 7469; L. salivarius: ATCC, 11741; L. rhamnosus: CMP5351 (Lebeer et al., 2009); L. rhamnosus GG: ATCC, 53103 (Lebeer et al., 2009)] were grown on Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar plates (Carl Roth) at 37°C and 1% O2. For use in experiments, bacterial cells were grown at 37°C without agitation in MRS broth (Carl Roth). Before experiments, lactobacilli were collected by centrifugation at 20,000 g, washed twice in PBS and diluted to an optical density OD600 of 1 in KBM medium equaling a cell number of ∼1×108 CFU/ml. For the killing of lactobacilli, bacterial cells were either treated for 30 min in Histofix (Carl Roth) or for 10 min at 90°C. Viability was proven by the absence of growth on MRS agar plates.
Cell culture
The human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 subclone Caco2 brush border expressing 1 (C2BBe1; ATCC, CRL2102™; Peterson and Mooseker, 1992) and the human intestinal goblet cell HT29-MTX (ATCC, HTB-38; CLS, Lot No. 13B021) were routinely cultivated in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Bio&Sell), 10 µg/ml Holotransferrin (Calbiochem, Merck) and 1% non-essential amino acids (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C and 5% CO2 for no longer than 15 passages. Cell lines have been authenticated via commercial STR profiling (Eurofins Genomic) and checked for contaminations using a PCR mycoplasma test kit (PromoKine) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For detachment, C2BBe1 cells and HT29-MTX cells were treated with Accutase or 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA solution (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively. For cell culture maintenance, cells were seeded in fresh 75 cm2 culture flasks containing supplemented DMEM at a 1:4 split ratio. For use in experiments, the cell numbers were determined using a Neubauer chamber system, and a mixture of C2BBe1:HT29-MTX cells at a 70:30 ratio was seeded in collagen I-coated [10 µg/ml collagen I for 2 h at room temperature (RT); Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific] well plates at an initial cell density of 2×104 cells/well in a 96-well plate, 1×105 cells/well in a 24-well plate and 4×105 cells/well in a 6-well plate. IECs were cultured with regular medium exchange for 14 days post-seeding for differentiation before experimental use.
Infection of IECs
For infection experiments, IECs were cultivated in serum-free KBM. Monolayers were either colonized (pre-incubated; pre-Inc.) with lactobacilli for 18 h before infection with C. albicans, or bacterial and fungal cells were added simultaneously (Fig. 1E). For displacement experiments, the sequence of inoculation was reversed. In this case, IECs were infected with C. albicans 1, 3 or 6 h before the addition of lactobacilli. Incubation was then continued for a total infection period of 24 h. For the exact number of cells (host, lactobacilli, and C. albicans) and incubation periods used in the respective experiments see Table S1. In addition to the coinfection of C. albicans and lactobacilli, single infections were carried out as controls.
Quantification of cytotoxicity (LDH)
The influence of lactobacilli on C. albicans-mediated host cell damage was investigated by measuring the release of cytoplasmic LDH (Chan et al., 2013) as a proxy for loss of membrane integrity, a hallmark of necrosis (Zhang et al., 2018). LDH was quantified in the supernatant of infected IEC monolayers 24-48 h post-infection using the Cytotoxicity Detection Kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. LDH from rabbit muscle (5 mg/ml, Roche) was used to generate a standard curve for the determination of LDH concentrations. The background control level of uninfected IECs was subtracted from the experimental LDH release and usually compared to 100% C. albicans single infection.
Adhesion and filamentation of C. albicans
Upon colonization with lactobacilli, adhesion of C. albicans to epithelial cells was determined 1 h post-infection (for infective doses see Table S1). Non-attached C. albicans cells were removed by washing twice with PBS. Samples were fixed with Histofix for 15 min at RT or o/n at 4°C and subsequently rinsed three times with PBS. Adherent fungi were stained with Calcofluor White [10 µg/ml in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), Sigma-Aldrich] for 20 min at RT in the dark. After washing three times with water, samples were mounted on glass slides with ProLong mounting medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. The number of adherent C. albicans cells was determined in random fields of a defined size, allowing calculation of the adhesion percentage versus inoculated C. albicans cells.
Hyphal length of C. albicans was analyzed using differential staining according to Wächtler et al. (2011), with the following minor modifications. Briefly, after 4 h of C. albicans infection, IECs were washed three times with PBS and fixed with Histofix. Extracellular non-invasive fungal components were stained by incubation with a primary antibody against C. albicans (1:2000 in PBS, rabbit anti-Candida, BP1006, Acris Antibodies) for 1 h at 30°C, washing three times with PBS and incubating with a secondary antibody (1:5000 in PBS, goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor488, A-11008, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at 30°C. After rinsing three times with PBS, epithelial cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min at RT and washed again three times with PBS. Entire C. albicans hyphae were stained with Calcofluor White [10 µg/ml in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0)] for 20 min at RT in the dark followed by washing three times with water. Stained samples were mounted on glass slides and visualized using fluorescence microscopy. The total hyphal length was also recorded for at least 100 hyphae per condition.
Hyphal length influenced by sodium L-lactate
A C. albicans o/n culture was adjusted to 4×105 cells/ml in KBM media. Sodium L-lactate (Sigma-Aldrich) was adjusted to a concentration of 0-120 mmol/l in a total volume of 375 µl per well in a 24-well plate (see Table S1). Cells were fixed with Histofix 4 h post-infection with C. albicans, and analyzed using a Cell Discoverer 7 (Carl Zeiss) with a 10× magnification. At least 100 hyphae per condition were measured to estimate average hyphal length.
In vitro translocation
For measuring translocation, IECs were cultivated for 14 days on collagen I-coated transwell inserts with a 6.5 mm diameter and 5 µm pore size (Corning). Following colonization with lactobacilli, cells were infected with 2×104 C. albicans cells per transwell for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 (see Table S1). TEER values were measured using a voltmeter (World Precision Instruments) before and after colonization and 24 h post-infection. The resistance of a blank insert (120 Ω) was subtracted from each value. The translocation rate 24 h post-infection was measured using the following procedure. Zymolyase (260 U/ml in serum-free DMEM; Amsbio) was added to the lower compartment to a final concentration of 20 U/ml and incubated for 2 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. The detached C. albicans hyphae were then collected and plated at appropriate dilutions on YPD agar plates. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 1-2 days until adequate growth for determining colony-forming units (CFUs) was reached.
Effects of lactobacilli cell-free supernatants
Lactobacilli were grown in MRS broth for 24 h at 37°C. The MRS-SN was prepared by centrifuging the culture at 4700 g for 5 min at 4°C, filtering through 0.22 µm filters (Millipore) and rebuffering against KBM medium within a 3K Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter device (Millipore) (final pH 7.3) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Moreover, IECs differentiated in 6-well plates were colonized with lactobacilli for 18 h. The culture supernatant (Pre-Inc. SN) was filtered through 0.22 µm filters (Millipore). Both supernatants were stored at 4°C until use in experiments the same day (see Table S1). Host cell damage induced by C. albicans infection in the presence of lactobacilli supernatants was measured 24 h post-infection by quantification of LDH (for format and volume see Table S1).
Glucose and lactate measurements
Glucose and lactate were measured in supernatants of the in vitro model (KBM media) in a 6-well format (see Table S1). We collected 120 µl of the supernatant after 0, 6, 12 and 24 h and analyzed using the Abbott Architect ci8200 Integrated System (Abbott Laboratories) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Basal levels of the KBM medium were 9 mmol/l glucose and <0.17 mmol/l lactate.
Quantification of shedding of C. albicans and lactobacilli – CFU determination
Shedding of C. albicans and lactobacilli was measured upon infection of Lactobacillus-colonized IECs for the respective time periods (see Table S1). Supernatants were collected and vortexed thoroughly. IECs were treated with 0.2% Triton-X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) to lyse the host cells and release adherent fungal and bacterial cells. Supernatant and lysate samples were diluted appropriately with PBS. To follow the growth of C. albicans, the diluted samples were plated on YPD plates with 1× PenStrep (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated at 30°C for 1-2 days until adequate growth for determining the CFUs was reached. For lactobacilli, MRS plates with Nystatin (50 µg/ml; Carl Roth) were used for plating and incubated at 37°C and 1% O2 for 2 days.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
IECs differentiated for 14 days in a 24-well plate on glass coverslips were colonized with lactobacilli for 18 h and infected with C. albicans for 6 h (see Table S1). The SEM samples were fixed by incubating them in cacodylate-buffer containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde o/n at 4°C. Afterwards samples were washed three times in cacodylate buffer and dehydrated in an ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 100% each 15 min), followed by critical point drying in a Leica EM CPD300 Automated Critical Point Dryer. The samples were sputter-coated with platin (layer thickness 20 nm) in a CCU-010 Compact Coating Unit (Safematic). Finally, samples were analyzed at different magnifications using a Zeiss (LEO) 1530 Gemini field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss) at 7 kV acceleration voltage and a working distance of 5 mm using an InLens secondary electron detector.
Isolation of human RNA
At the indicated time points uninfected, single infected and mixed infected IECs were harvested by removing supernatants and adding RLT buffer (Qiagen) to the host cell lawn. The cell lysates were further processed with the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Human RNA quantity was determined using a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and RNA quality was verified with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).
Reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR)
We reverse transcribed 500 ng of high-quality DNase I-treated RNA samples into cDNA using oligo-dT primers and SuperScript™ III Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies). Subsequently, 1 µl of diluted cDNA was used for gene expression analyses with EVAGreen® qPCR Mix (Bio&Sell) and a C1000 thermocycler (Bio-Rad). Expression levels of biological triplicates were normalized to the reference genes ACT1 and GAPDH. Primers used for qPCR analyses are listed in Table S2.
Mucin ELISAs
Differentiated IECs were colonized with lactobacilli and infected with C. albicans for 24 h (see Table S1). For the measurement of released and membrane-bound mucin proteins, supernatant samples were collected and IECs were lysed by treatment with 75 µl RIPA-buffer (Millipore) containing protease inhibitors (cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Roche). Supernatant and lysate samples were mixed and centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min at 4°C. Mucin concentrations were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Human MUC 2, 3, 4, 13 and 17, ELISA Kit, DlDevelop; Human MUC5AC, ELISA Kit, Elabscience).
Apoptosis
Differentiated IECs were colonized with lactobacilli or not and infected with C. albicans or not (see Table S1). Simultaneously with C. albicans infection, IECs were stained for phosphatidyl serine expression using annexin V (pSIVA™ Real-Time Apoptosis Kit; Bio-Rad) and caspase 3/7 activity (CellEvent™ Caspase 3/7 detection reagent; Invitrogen, Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Apoptosis was followed by live-cell imaging of the fluorescence at an excitation maximum of 488 nm (annexin V or caspase 3/7) every 1 h using a Cell Discoverer 7 (Carl Zeiss) with a 10× magnification. Images were processed using the Fiji software (ImageJ). After conversion to binary images, the total area of positive cells was determined using the Particle Analyzer tool. To inhibit apoptosis, the caspase 3/7 inhibitor 1 MMPSI (Abcam) dissolved in ethanol with a final concentration of 50 µM was used.
Quantification of shedding of apoptotic cells
Differentiated IECs were colonized with lactobacilli or not and infected with C. albicans or not (see Table S1). Supernatants were collected, placed in a new 24-well plate and stained for caspase 3/7 activity (CellEvent™ Caspase 3/7 detection reagent; Invitrogen), subsequently the entire wells were imaged at an excitation maximum of 488 nm at 10× magnification in a Cell Discoverer 7 (Carl Zeiss). Images were processed using the Fiji software (ImageJ) and cells were quantified using the Particle Analyser tool.
Western blot analysis
Differentiated IECs were colonized with L. rhamnosus or L. brevis and infected with C. albicans for 6, 12 and 24 h (see Table S1). Following incubation, supernatants were removed and cells were scraped off in PBS followed by centrifugation for 1 min at 500 g. The pellet was resuspended in 100 μl modified RIPA buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS] containing protease inhibitors (cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Roche) and phosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation for 5 min at 20,000 g at 4°C and protein concentration was quantified using a BCA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Diluted protein extracts were denatured in 1× Laemmli Sample Buffer [125 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 50% glycerol, 4% SDS, 0.02% Bromphenol blue, 0.1% 14 M 2-mercaptoethanol] for 5 min at 95°C and centrifuged for 5 s at 5000 g. For SDS-PAGE, 30 µg of sample was separated on 10% SDS PAGE gels using a Mini-PROTEAN® Tetra Cell system (Bio-Rad) and separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (AmershamTM ProtonTM 0.45 μM NC, GE Healthcare). The membranes were blocked with 5% I-Block protein-based blocking reagent (Life Technologies), solved in TBS-T [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20] and then incubated with primary antibodies E-cadherin (1:500, goat anti-human, AF648, R&D Systems) and GAPDH (1:500, rabbit anti-human, NB300-327, Novus) o/n at 4°C. After washing three times with TBS-T, membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (E-Cadherin: anti-goat, 1:2000, SC-2020, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; GAPDH: anti-rabbit, 1:500, P0217, Dako) followed by three washing steps. Immunoreactivity was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Coomassie staining of membrane or gel was used to ensure equal loading of supernatant samples to the gel (not shown).
Statistical analyses
Experiments were performed in biological triplicates (n≥3) unless otherwise stated. Data are mean of biological replicates±s.e.m. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7. For significance testing, lognormal ratio values were log transformed and tested against deviation from zero using a two-tailed t-test or by means of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with a follow-up test for multiple comparisons (Tukey's correction). Other values were tested using two-tailed t-tests against the reference condition. Normality of individual distributions were ascertained by Shapiro-Wilk normality tests (threshold P>0.05) before claiming significance by t-tests, one-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated in the graphs: *P≤0.05, **P≤0.01 or ***P≤0.001.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Lebeer (Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Belgium) for providing the strains L. rhamnosus CMP5351 and L. rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103. We thank J. L. Sprague for proofreading the manuscript.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: K.G., A.L., B.H.; Methodology: K.G., A.L., R.G., S.A., S.L., M.W.; Software: S.L., M.W., M.S.G.; Validation: A.L.; Formal analysis: K.G., A.L., R.G., S.A., M.G., A.S.M., M.S.G.; Investigation: K.G., A.L., R.G.; Resources: B.H.; Writing - original draft: K.G., A.L.; Writing - review & editing: K.G., S.A., A.S.M., M.S.G., B.H.; Visualization: K.G., A.L.; Supervision: K.G., M.S.G., B.H.; Project administration: K.G., B.H.; Funding acquisition: B.H.
Funding
B.H. and A.S.M. received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreements 812969 (FunHoMic) and 812954 (EUROoC). B.H., A.S.M. and A.L. were supported by the Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC)/Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (grant 01EO1002). A.L. is a member of the CSCC Research Training Group. B.H. and A.L. were further supported by the Infect ERA-NET Program (FunComPath; BMBF grant 031L0001A), and M.S.G. was supported by a Humboldt Research Fellowship (Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung).
Supplementary information
Supplementary information available online at http://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.039719.supplemental
References
- Alander M., Korpela R., Saxelin M., Vilpponen-Salmela T., Mattila-Sandholm T. and von Wright A. (1997). Recovery of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG from human colonic biopsies. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 24, 361-364. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00140.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alander M., Satokari R., Korpela R., Saxelin M., Vilpponen-Salmela T., Mattila-Sandholm T. and von Wright A. (1999). Persistence of colonization of human colonic mucosa by a probiotic strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, after oral consumption. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 351-354. 10.1097/00017285-199611001-00016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allert S., Förster T. M., Svensson C. M., Richardson J. P., Pawlik T., Hebecker B., Rudolphi S., Juraschitz M., Schaller M., Blagojevic M. et al. (2018). Candida albicans-induced epithelial damage mediates translocation through intestinal barriers. MBio 9, e00915-18 10.1128/mBio.00915-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allonsius C. N., van den Broek M. F. L., De Boeck I., Kiekens S., Oerlemans E. F. M., Kiekens F., Foubert K., Vandenheuvel D., Cos P., Delputte P. et al. (2017). Interplay between Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Candida and the involvement of exopolysaccharides. Microb. Biotechnol. 10, 1753-1763. 10.1111/1751-7915.12799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allonsius C. N., Vandenheuvel D., Oerlemans E. F. M., Petrova M. I., Donders G. G. G., Cos P., Delputte P. and Lebeer S. (2019). Inhibition of Candida albicans morphogenesis by chitinase from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Sci. Rep. 9, 2900 10.1038/s41598-019-39625-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bamford C. V., d'Mello A., Nobbs A. H., Dutton L. C., Vickerman M. M. and Jenkinson H. F. (2009). Streptococcus gordonii modulates Candida albicans biofilm formation through intergeneric communication. Infect. Immun. 77, 3696-3704. 10.1128/iai.00438-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett A. M., Roy N. C., Cookson A. L. and McNabb W. C. (2018). Metabolism of caprine milk carbohydrates by probiotic bacteria and caco-2:HT29(-)MTX epithelial co-cultures and their impact on intestinal barrier integrity. Nutrients 10, 949 10.3390/nu10070949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bassetti M., Taramasso L., Nicco E., Molinari M. P., Mussap M. and Viscoli C. (2011). Epidemiology, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility and outcome of nosocomial candidemia in a tertiary care hospital in Italy. PLoS ONE 6, e24198 10.1371/journal.pone.0024198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beauséjour M., Noël D., Thibodeau S., Bouchard V., Harnois C., Beaulieu J. F., Demers M. J. and Vachon P. H. (2012). Integrin/Fak/Src-mediated regulation of cell survival and anoikis in human intestinal epithelial crypt cells: selective engagement and roles of PI3-K isoform complexes. Apoptosis 17, 566-578. 10.1007/s10495-012-0713-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beduneau A., Tempesta C., Fimbel S., Pellequer Y., Jannin V., Demarne F. and Lamprecht A. (2014). A tunable Caco-2/HT29-MTX co-culture model mimicking variable permeabilities of the human intestine obtained by an original seeding procedure. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 87, 290-298. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bischoff S. C., Barbara G., Buurman W., Ockhuizen T., Schulzke J.-D., Serino M., Tilg H., Watson A. and Wells J. M. (2014). Intestinal permeability–a new target for disease prevention and therapy. BMC Gastroenterol. 14, 189 10.1186/s12876-014-0189-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Böhringer M., Pohlers S., Schulze S., Albrecht-Eckardt D., Piegsa J., Weber M., Martin R., Hunniger K., Linde J., Guthke R. et al. (2016). Candida albicans infection leads to barrier breakdown and a MAPK/NF-kappaB mediated stress response in the intestinal epithelial cell line C2BBe1. Cell. Microbiol. 18, 889-904. 10.1111/cmi.12566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bougnoux M.-E., Diogo D., Francois N., Sendid B., Veirmeire S., Colombel J. F., Bouchier C., Van Kruiningen H., d'Enfert C. and Poulain D. (2006). Multilocus sequence typing reveals intrafamilial transmission and microevolutions of Candida albicans isolates from the human digestive tract. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 1810-1820. 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1810-1820.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buffo J., Herman M. A. and Soll D. R. (1984). A characterization of pH-regulated dimorphism in Candida albicans. Mycopathologia 85, 21-30. 10.1007/BF00436698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bullen T. F., Forrest S., Campbell F., Dodson A. R., Hershman M. J., Pritchard D. M., Turner J. R., Montrose M. H. and Watson A. J. M. (2006). Characterization of epithelial cell shedding from human small intestine. Lab. Invest. 86, 1052-1063. 10.1038/labinvest.3700464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan F. K.-M., Moriwaki K. and De Rosa M. J. (2013). Detection of necrosis by release of lactate dehydrogenase activity. Methods Mol. Biol. 979, 65-70. 10.1007/978-1-62703-290-2_7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cockburn D. W. and Koropatkin N. M. (2016). Polysaccharide degradation by the intestinal microbiota and its influence on human health and disease. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 3230-3252. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coman M. M., Verdenelli M. C., Cecchini C., Silvi S., Orpianesi C., Caspani M., Mondello F. and Cresci A. (2015). In vitro evaluation on HeLa cells of protective mechanisms of probiotic lactobacilli against Candida clinical isolates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 119, 1383-1390. 10.1111/jam.12947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cruz M. R., Graham C. E., Gagliano B. C., Lorenz M. C. and Garsin D. A. (2013). Enterococcus faecalis inhibits hyphal morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 81, 189-200. 10.1128/IAI.00914-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dalle F., Wächtler B., L'Ollivier C., Holland G., Bannert N., Wilson D., Labruere C., Bonnin A. and Hube B. (2010). Cellular interactions of Candida albicans with human oral epithelial cells and enterocytes. Cell. Microbiol. 12, 248-271. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01394.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Barros P. P., Scorzoni L., Ribeiro F. d. C., de Oliveira Fugisaki L. R., Fuchs B. B., Mylonakis E., Jorge A. O. C., Junqueira J. C. and Rossoni R. D. (2018). Lactobacillus paracasei 28.4 reduces in vitro hyphae formation of Candida albicans and prevents the filamentation in an experimental model of Caenorhabditis elegans. Microb. Pathog. 117, 80-87. 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- do Carmo M. S., Noronha F. M., Arruda M. O., Costa E. P., Bomfim M. R., Monteiro A. S., Ferro T. A., Fernandes E. S., Giron J. A. and Monteiro-Neto V. (2016). Lactobacillus fermentum ATCC 23271 displays in vitro inhibitory activities against Candida spp. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1722 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donnarumma G., Molinaro A., Cimini D., De Castro C., Valli V., De Gregorio V., De Rosa M. and Schiraldi C. (2014). Lactobacillus crispatus L1: high cell density cultivation and exopolysaccharide structure characterization to highlight potentially beneficial effects against vaginal pathogens. BMC Microbiol. 14, 137 10.1186/1471-2180-14-137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan D., Coughlin L. A., Neubauer M. M., Kim J., Kim M. S., Zhan X., Simms-Waldrip T. R., Xie Y., Hooper L. V. and Koh A. Y. (2015). Activation of HIF-1alpha and LL-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits Candida albicans colonization. Nat. Med. 21, 808-814. 10.1038/nm.3871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felten A., Barreau C., Bizet C., Lagrange P. H. and Philippon A. (1999). Lactobacillus species identification, H2O2 production, and antibiotic resistance and correlation with human clinical status. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 729-733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferraretto A., Bottani M., De Luca P., Cornaghi L., Arnaboldi F., Maggioni M., Fiorilli A. and Donetti E. (2018). Morphofunctional properties of a differentiated Caco2/HT-29 co-culture as an in vitro model of human intestinal epithelium. Biosci. Rep. 38, BSR20171497 10.1042/BSR20171497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finegold S. M., Sutter V. L., Sugihara P. T., Elder H. A., Lehmann S. M. and Phillips R. L. (1977). Fecal microbial flora in Seventh Day Adventist populations and control subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 30, 1781-1792. 10.1093/ajcn/30.11.1781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Förster T. M., Mogavero S., Dräger A., Graf K., Polke M., Jacobsen I. D. and Hube B. (2016). Enemies and brothers in arms: Candida albicans and gram-positive bacteria. Cell. Microbiol. 18, 1709-1715. 10.1111/cmi.12657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fracchia L., Cavallo M., Allegrone G. and Martinotti M. G. (2010). A Lactobacillus-derived biosurfactant inhibits biofilm formation of human pathogenic Candida albicans biofilm producers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2, 827-837. [Google Scholar]
- Gouba N. and Drancourt M. (2015). Digestive tract mycobiota: a source of infection. Med. Mal. Infect. 45, 9-16. 10.1016/j.medmal.2015.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gow N. A., van de Veerdonk F. L., Brown A. J. and Netea M. G. (2011). Candida albicans morphogenesis and host defence: discriminating invasion from colonization. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 112-122. 10.1038/nrmicro2711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guan Y., Watson A. J., Marchiando A. M., Bradford E., Shen L., Turner J. R. and Montrose M. H. (2011). Redistribution of the tight junction protein ZO-1 during physiological shedding of mouse intestinal epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 300, C1404-C1414. 10.1152/ajpcell.00270.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hafez M. M. (2012). Upregulation of intestinal mucin expression by the probiotic bacterium E. coli Nissle 1917. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 4, 67-77. 10.1007/s12602-012-9092-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasslöf P., Hedberg M., Twetman S. and Stecksén-Blicks C. (2010). Growth inhibition of oral mutans streptococci and candida by commercial probiotic lactobacilli--an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 10, 18 10.1186/1472-6831-10-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hatakka K., Ahola A. J., Yli-Knuuttila H., Richardson M., Poussa T., Meurman J. H. and Korpela R. (2007). Probiotics reduce the prevalence of oral candida in the elderly – a randomized controlled trial. J. Dent. Res. 86, 125-130. 10.1177/154405910708600204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Höfs S., Mogavero S. and Hube B. (2016). Interaction of Candida albicans with host cells: virulence factors, host defense, escape strategies, and the microbiota. J. Microbiol. 54, 149-169. 10.1007/s12275-016-5514-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hube B. (2004). From commensal to pathogen: stage- and tissue-specific gene expression of Candida albicans. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7, 336-341. 10.1016/j.mib.2004.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hütt P., Lapp E., Stsepetova J., Smidt I., Taelma H., Borovkova N., Oopkaup H., Ahelik A., Roop T., Hoidmets D. et al. (2016). Characterisation of probiotic properties in human vaginal lactobacilli strains. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 27, 30484 10.3402/mehd.v27.30484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs M. D. and Harrison S. C. (1998). Structure of an IkappaBalpha/NF-kappaB complex. Cell 95, 749-758. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81698-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- James K. M., MacDonald K. W., Chanyi R. M., Cadieux P. A. and Burton J. P. (2016). Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation and modulation of gene expression by probiotic cells and supernatant. J. Med. Microbiol. 65, 328-336. 10.1099/jmm.0.000226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaewsrichan J., Peeyananjarassri K. and Kongprasertkit J. (2006). Selection and identification of anaerobic lactobacilli producing inhibitory compounds against vaginal pathogens. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 48, 75-83. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00124.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang C. H., Kim Y., Han S. H., Kim J. S., Paek N. S. and So J. S. (2018). In vitro probiotic properties of vaginal Lactobacillus fermentum MG901 and Lactobacillus plantarum MG989 against Candida albicans. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 228, 232-237. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kavanaugh N. L., Zhang A. Q., Nobile C. J., Johnson A. D. and Ribbeck K. (2014). Mucins suppress virulence traits of Candida albicans. MBio 5, e01911 10.1128/mBio.01911-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y., Kim S. H., Whang K. Y., Kim Y. J. and Oh S. (2008). Inhibition of Escherichia coli O157:H7 attachment by interactions between lactic acid bacteria and intestinal epithelial cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18, 1278-1285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleerebezem M., Hols P., Bernard E., Rolain T., Zhou M., Siezen R. J. and Bron P. A. (2010). The extracellular biology of the lactobacilli. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34, 199-230. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00208.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koh A. Y. (2013). Murine models of Candida gastrointestinal colonization and dissemination. Eukaryot. Cell 12, 1416-1422. 10.1128/EC.00196-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koh A. Y., Köhler J. R., Coggshall K. T., Van Rooijen N. and Pier G. B. (2008). Mucosal damage and neutropenia are required for Candida albicans dissemination. PLoS Pathog. 4, e35 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Köhler G. A., Assefa S. and Reid G. (2012). Probiotic interference of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 with the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 636474 10.1155/2012/636474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S., Bansal A., Chakrabarti A. and Singhi S. (2013). Evaluation of efficacy of probiotics in prevention of candida colonization in a PICU-a randomized controlled trial. Crit. Care Med. 41, 565-572. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826a409c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lambooij J. M., Hoogenkamp M. A., Brandt B. W., Janus M. M. and Krom B. P. (2017). Fungal mitochondrial oxygen consumption induces the growth of strict anaerobic bacteria. Fungal Genet. Biol. 109, 1-6. 10.1016/j.fgb.2017.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebeer S., Verhoeven T. L. A., Francius G., Schoofs G., Lambrichts I., Dufrene Y., Vanderleyden J. and De Keersmaecker S. C. J. (2009). Identification of a gene cluster for the biosynthesis of a long, galactose-rich exopolysaccharide in Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and functional analysis of the priming glycosyltransferase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 3554-3563. 10.1128/AEM.02919-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebeer S., Vanderleyden J. and De Keersmaecker S. C. J. (2010). Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 171-184. 10.1038/nrmicro2297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebeer S., Claes I., Tytgat H. L. P., Verhoeven T. L. A., Marien E., von Ossowski I., Reunanen J., Palva A., de Vos W. M., Keersmaecker S. C. J. et al. (2012). Functional analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG pili in relation to adhesion and immunomodulatory interactions with intestinal epithelial cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 185-193. 10.1128/AEM.06192-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X. J., Yue L. Y., Guan X. F. and Qiao S. Y. (2008). The adhesion of putative probiotic lactobacilli to cultured epithelial cells and porcine intestinal mucus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104, 1082-1091. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03636.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mailänder-Sánchez D., Braunsdorf C., Grumaz C., Müller C., Lorenz S., Stevens P., Wagener J., Hebecker B., Hube B., Bracher F. et al. (2017). Antifungal defense of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG is mediated by blocking adhesion and nutrient depletion. PLoS ONE 12, e0184438 10.1371/journal.pone.0184438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malik S., Petrova M. I., Imholz N. C., Verhoeven T. L., Noppen S., Van Damme E. J., Liekens S., Balzarini J., Schols D., Vanderleyden J. et al. (2016). High mannose-specific lectin Msl mediates key interactions of the vaginal Lactobacillus plantarum isolate CMPG5300. Sci. Rep. 6, 37339 10.1038/srep37339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manzoni P., Mostert M., Leonessa M. L., Priolo C., Farina D., Monetti C., Latino M. A. and Gomirato G. (2006). Oral supplementation with Lactobacillus casei subspecies rhamnosus prevents enteric colonization by Candida species in preterm neonates: a randomized study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42, 1735-1742. 10.1086/504324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manzoni P., Lista G., Gallo E., Marangione P., Priolo C., Fontana P., Guardione R. and Farina D. (2011). Routine Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG administration in VLBW infants: a retrospective, 6-year cohort study. Early Hum. Dev. 87 Suppl. 1, S35-S38. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.01.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marranzino G., Villena J., Salva S. and Alvarez S. (2012). Stimulation of macrophages by immunobiotic Lactobacillus strains: influence beyond the intestinal tract. Microbiol. Immunol. 56, 771-781. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00495.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez R. C., Franceschini S. A., Patta M. C., Quintana S. M., Candido R. C., Ferreira J. C., De Martinis E. C. P. and Reid G. (2009). Improved treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis with fluconazole plus probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 48, 269-274. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02477.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mason K. L., Erb Downward J. R., Mason K. D., Falkowski N. R., Eaton K. A., Kao J. Y., Young V. B. and Huffnagle G. B. (2012). Candida albicans and bacterial microbiota interactions in the cecum during recolonization following broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Infect. Immun. 80, 3371-3380. 10.1128/IAI.00449-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsubara V. H., Bandara H. M., Mayer M. P. and Samaranayake L. P. (2016a). Probiotics as Antifungals in Mucosal Candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 62, 1143-1153. 10.1093/cid/ciw038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsubara V. H., Wang Y., Bandara H. M. H. N., Mayer M. P. A. and Samaranayake L. P. (2016b). Probiotic lactobacilli inhibit early stages of Candida albicans biofilm development by reducing their growth, cell adhesion, and filamentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 6415-6426. 10.1007/s00253-016-7527-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maudsdotter L., Jonsson H., Roos S. and Jonsson A.-B. (2011). Lactobacilli reduce cell cytotoxicity caused by Streptococcus pyogenes by producing lactic acid that degrades the toxic component lipoteichoic acid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 1622-1628. 10.1128/AAC.00770-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maynard C. L., Elson C. O., Hatton R. D. and Weaver C. T. (2012). Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature 489, 231-241. 10.1038/nature11551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miranda L. N., van der Heijden I. M., Costa S. F., Sousa A. P., Sienra R. A., Gobara S., Santos C. R., Lobo R. D., Pessoa V. P. Jr and Levin A. S. (2009). Candida colonisation as a source for candidaemia. J. Hosp. Infect. 72, 9-16. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morais I. M. C., Cordeiro A. L., Teixeira G. S., Domingues V. S., Nardi R. M. D., Monteiro A. S., Alves R. J., Siqueira E. P. and Santos V. L. (2017). Biological and physicochemical properties of biosurfactants produced by Lactobacillus jensenii P6A and Lactobacillus gasseri P65. Microb Cell Fact 16, 155 10.1186/s12934-017-0769-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moyes D. L., Runglall M., Murciano C., Shen C., Nayar D., Thavaraj S., Kohli A., Islam A., Mora-Montes H., Challacombe S. J. et al. (2010). A biphasic innate immune MAPK response discriminates between the yeast and hyphal forms of Candida albicans in epithelial cells. Cell Host Microbe 8, 225-235. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moyes D. L., Murciano C., Runglall M., Islam A., Thavaraj S. and Naglik J. R. (2011). Candida albicans yeast and hyphae are discriminated by MAPK signaling in vaginal epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 6, e26580 10.1371/journal.pone.0026580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moyes D. L., Wilson D., Richardson J. P., Mogavero S., Tang S. X., Wernecke J., Hofs S., Gratacap R. L., Robbins J., Runglall M. et al. (2016). Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature 532, 64-68. 10.1038/nature17625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naglik J. R., Fidel P. L. Jr. and Odds F. C. (2008). Animal models of mucosal Candida infection. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 283, 129-139. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01160.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu X. X., Li T., Zhang X., Wang S. X. and Liu Z. H. (2017). Lactobacillus crispatus modulates vaginal epithelial cell innate response to Candida albicans. Chin. Med. J. 130, 273-279. 10.4103/0366-6999.198927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noverr M. C. and Huffnagle G. B. (2004). Regulation of Candida albicans morphogenesis by fatty acid metabolites. Infect. Immun. 72, 6206-6210. 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6206-6210.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nucci M. and Anaissie E. (2001). Revisiting the source of candidemia: skin or gut? Clin. Infect. Dis. 33, 1959-1967. 10.1086/323759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oncel M. Y., Arayici S., Sari F. N., Simsek G. K., Yurttutan S., Erdeve O., Saygan S., Uras N., Oguz S. S. and Dilmen U. (2015). Comparison of Lactobacillus reuteri and nystatin prophylaxis on Candida colonization and infection in very low birth weight infants. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 28, 1790-1794. 10.3109/14767058.2014.968842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parolin C., Marangoni A., Laghi L., Foschi C., Nahui Palomino R. A., Calonghi N., Cevenini R. and Vitali B. (2015). Isolation of vaginal lactobacilli and characterization of anti-candida activity. PLoS ONE 10, e0131220 10.1371/journal.pone.0131220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson L. W. and Artis D. (2014). Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 141-153. 10.1038/nri3608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson M. and Mooseker M. S. (1992). Characterization of the enterocyte-like brush border cytoskeleton of the C2BBe clones of the human intestinal cell line, Caco-2. J. Cell Sci. 102, 581-600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patterson A. M. and Watson A. J. M. (2017). Deciphering the complex signaling systems that regulate intestinal epithelial cell death processes and shedding. Front. Immunol. 8, 841 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patterson K. I., Brummer T., O'Brien P. M. and Daly R. J. (2009). Dual-specificity phosphatases: critical regulators with diverse cellular targets. Biochem. J. 418, 475-489. 10.1042/BJ20082234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piano M. D., Carmagnola S., Ballare M., Balzarini M., Montino F., Pagliarulo M., Anderloni A., Orsello M., Tari R., Sforza F. et al. (2012). Comparison of the kinetics of intestinal colonization by associating 5 probiotic bacteria assumed either in a microencapsulated or in a traditional, uncoated form. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 46 Suppl., S85-S92. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182672796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plantinga T. S., van Bergenhenegouwen J., Jacobs C., Joosten L. A., van't Land B., Garssen J. and Netea M. G. (2012). Modulation of Toll-like receptor ligands and Candida albicans-induced cytokine responses by specific probiotics. Cytokine 59, 159-165. 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Potten C. S. (1990). A comprehensive study of the radiobiological response of the murine (BDF1) small intestine. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 58, 925-973. 10.1080/09553009014552281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro F. C., de Barros P. P., Rossoni R. D., Junqueira J. C. and Jorge A. O. (2017). Lactobacillus rhamnosus inhibits Candida albicans virulence factors in vitro and modulates immune system in Galleria mellonella. J. Appl. Microbiol. 122, 201-211. 10.1111/jam.13324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rizzo A., Losacco A. and Carratelli C. R. (2013). Lactobacillus crispatus modulates epithelial cell defense against Candida albicans through Toll-like receptors 2 and 4, interleukin 8 and human beta-defensins 2 and 3. Immunol. Lett. 156, 102-109. 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romeo M. G., Romeo D. M., Trovato L., Oliveri S., Palermo F., Cota F. and Betta P. (2011). Role of probiotics in the prevention of the enteric colonization by Candida in preterm newborns: incidence of late-onset sepsis and neurological outcome. J. Perinatol. 31, 63-69. 10.1038/jp.2010.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rouabhia M., Semlali A., Audoy J. and Chmielewski W. (2012). Antagonistic effect of Candida albicans and IFNgamma on E-cadherin expression and production by human primary gingival epithelial cells. Cell. Immunol. 280, 61-67. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2012.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos C. M. A., Pires M. C. V., Leão T. L., Hernández Z. P., Rodriguez M. L., Martins A. K. S., Miranda L. S., Martins F. S. and Nicoli J. R. (2016). Selection of Lactobacillus strains as potential probiotics for vaginitis treatment. Microbiology 162, 1195-1207. 10.1099/mic.0.000302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos C. M. A., Pires M. C. V., Leão T. L., Silva A. K. S., Miranda L. S., Martins F. S., Silva A. M. and Nicoli J. R. (2018). Anti-inflammatory effect of two Lactobacillus strains during infection with Gardnerella vaginalis and Candida albicans in a HeLa cell culture model. Microbiology 164, 349-358. 10.1099/mic.0.000608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sekirov I., Russell S. L., Antunes L. C. M. and Finlay B. B. (2010). Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 90, 859-904. 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strus M., Kucharska A., Kukla G., Brzychczy-Wloch M., Maresz K. and Heczko P. B. (2005). The in vitro activity of vaginal Lactobacillus with probiotic properties against Candida. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 13, 69-75. 10.1080/10647440400028136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sungur T., Aslim B., Karaaslan C. and Aktas B. (2017). Impact of Exopolysaccharides (EPSs) of Lactobacillus gasseri strains isolated from human vagina on cervical tumor cells (HeLa). Anaerobe 47, 137-144. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan Y., Leonhard M., Moser D. and Schneider-Stickler B. (2017). Inhibition activity of Lactobacilli supernatant against fungal-bacterial multispecies biofilms on silicone. Microb. Pathog. 113, 197-201. 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.10.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tucey T. M., Verma J., Harrison P. F., Snelgrove S. L., Lo T. L., Scherer A. K., Barugahare A. A., Powell D. R., Wheeler R. T., Hickey M. J. et al. (2018). Glucose homeostasis is important for immune cell viability during candida challenge and host survival of systemic fungal infection. Cell Metab. 27, 988-1006.e7. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valeur N., Engel P., Carbajal N., Connolly E. and Ladefoged K. (2004). Colonization and immunomodulation by Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 in the human gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1176-1181. 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1176-1181.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wächtler B., Wilson D., Haedicke K., Dalle F. and Hube B. (2011). From attachment to damage: defined genes of Candida albicans mediate adhesion, invasion and damage during interaction with oral epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 6, e17046 10.1371/journal.pone.0017046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S., Wang Q., Yang E., Yan L., Li T. and Zhuang H. (2017). Antimicrobial compounds produced by vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus are able to strongly inhibit Candida albicans growth, hyphal formation and regulate virulence-related gene expressions. Front. Microbiol. 8, 564 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wickström C., Chavez de Paz L., Davies J. R. and Svensäter G. (2013). Surface-associated MUC5B mucins promote protease activity in Lactobacillus fermentum biofilms. BMC Oral Health 13, 43 10.1186/1472-6831-13-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams J. M., Duckworth C. A., Burkitt M. D., Watson A. J. M., Campbell B. J. and Pritchard D. M. (2015). Epithelial cell shedding and barrier function: a matter of life and death at the small intestinal villus tip. Vet. Pathol. 52, 445-455. 10.1177/0300985814559404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu H., Sobue T., Bertolini M., Thompson A. and Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. (2016). Streptococcus oralis and Candida albicans synergistically activate mu-Calpain to degrade E-cadherin from oral epithelial junctions. J. Infect. Dis. 214, 925-934. 10.1093/infdis/jiw201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan L., Yang C. and Tang J. (2013). Disruption of the intestinal mucosal barrier in Candida albicans infections. Microbiol. Res. 168, 389-395. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zakaria Gomaa E. (2013). Antimicrobial and anti-adhesive properties of biosurfactant produced by lactobacilli isolates, biofilm formation and aggregation ability. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 59, 425-436. 10.2323/jgam.59.425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Chen X., Gueydan C. and Han J. (2018). Plasma membrane changes during programmed cell deaths. Cell Res. 28, 9-21. 10.1038/cr.2017.133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng L., Kelly C. J. and Colgan S. P. (2015). Physiologic hypoxia and oxygen homeostasis in the healthy intestine. A review in the theme: cellular responses to hypoxia. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 309, C350-C360. 10.1152/ajpcell.00191.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zielinska D., Dlugosz E. and Zawistowska-Deniziak A. (2018). Functional properties of food origin Lactobacillus in the gastrointestinal ecosystem-in vitro study. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 11, 1-10. 10.1007/s12602-018-9458-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zivkovic M., Hidalgo-Cantabrana C., Kojic M., Gueimonde M., Golic N. and Ruas-Madiedo P. (2015). Capability of exopolysaccharide-producing Lactobacillus paraplantarum BGCG11 and its non-producing isogenic strain NB1, to counteract the effect of enteropathogens upon the epithelial cell line HT29-MTX. Food Res. Int. 74, 199-207. 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.