Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2019 Sep 4;116(39):19222–19224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913311116

Production of hydrogen peroxide enabled by microdroplets

Chongqin Zhu a,b, Joseph S Francisco a,b,1
PMCID: PMC6765242  PMID: 31484759

Geometry and dimensionality of a reaction system are known to play an important role in determining the yield as well as the rate of the reaction, especially in simple bimolecular reactions (18). Recently, several results have been reported for reactions in small droplets, which include charged microdroplets (3), microdiameter emulsions (2), inverted micelles (4), and the surfaces of aerosol particles (1). It has been found that chemical reactions can be accelerated in water microdroplets (2, 3, 6, 7), which indicates that the surface of aqueous microdroplets provides a unique reaction environment with different thermodynamics and kinetic properties compared to the bulk phase. In PNAS, Lee et al. (8) report experimental evidence that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is spontaneously produced from pure water by atomizing bulk water into microdroplets, which does not occur in bulk aqueous solutions. Production of H2O2 increases with decreasing microdroplet size, and the generated H2O2 concentration is ∼30 µM. Further analysis suggests that hydroxyl radical (OH) (which is generated by loss of an electron from OH near the surface of the water microdroplet) recombination is the most likely source.

H2O2 is a very simple compound in nature but with great importance in clinical, pharmaceutical, textile, environmental, and food manufacturing applications. One of the most important applications of H2O2 is its use in pulp and paper bleaching (9). It is also a very attractive oxidant for liquid-phase reactions, since H2O2 can oxidize a large variety of inorganic and organic substrates in liquid-phase reactions under very mild reaction conditions. Also, it can be used to improve the environment by oxidative removal of toxic compounds (10). Upon decomposition, H2O2 generates oxygen and water, and so it is considered environmentally friendly. Currently, H2O2 is produced industrially almost exclusively with the anthraquinone oxidation (AO) process, in which atmospheric oxygen, hydrogen, and an anthraquinone derivative are employed in the reaction cycle (9). The crude H2O2 obtained from this process is purified and concentrated. However, the AO process is not considered an environmentally friendly process since organic wastes are generated from inefficient oxidation of the anthraquinone. Some advances in H2O2 synthesis have been based on the partial oxidation of primary or secondary alcohols, the oxidation of a methylbenzyl alcohol, and electrolysis of a dilute solution of NaOH in an electrochemical cell (Dow process). However, these synthesis methods have limitations including low yields and high energy consumption (11).

Using a H2O2-sensitive water-soluble fluorescent probe, i.e., peroxyfluor-1 (PF-1), Lee et al. (8) have probed the fluorescence intensity of an aqueous solution containing 10 µM PF-1 as a function of microdroplet diameter. Their experiments showed that strong fluorescence emission was observed from microdroplets, suggesting that H2O2 was produced in microdroplets, but not in bulk water. By detailed analyses of the relationship between fluorescence intensity and microdroplet size, they showed that the yield of H2O2 increased as the microdroplet size decreased when the diameter of microdroplet is below ∼20 µm. The production of H2O2 in aqueous microdroplets can be further confirmed by assaying the cleavage of 4-carboxyphenylboronic acid by H2O2. Spontaneous generation of H2O2 from aqueous microdroplets observed in the absence of applied voltage, catalyst, or any other added chemicals may be used as an alternative method for green production of H2O2 (9). Measurement of H2O2 produced under different nebulization gases (dry air, N2, and O2) suggests that the reactions that generate H2O2 in microdroplets do not involve atmospheric oxygen or dissolved oxygen as a reactant. Furthermore, triboelectric effect, asymmetric charge separation during microdroplet fission, contact electrification, and the oxidation of water by the intrinsic surface potential of the water microdroplet surface are excluded for the formation of H2O2 by Lee et al. Based on these analysis, they propose that several factors unique to microdroplets may play a key role in the formation of H2O2. The strong electric field of the air–water interface of a microdroplet can ionize hydroxide ions to form hydroxyl radicals, which recombine to form H2O2 (12).

It is noteworthy that, to investigate the formation of H2O2 in microdroplets, microdroplets with diameter ranging from 1 to 250 µm were generated by spraying water (8). Such microdroplets have counterparts in the natural environment. Therefore, understanding chemistry in microdroplets from laboratory model studies can be generalized. Aqueous microdroplets and water–air interfaces are ubiquitous in nature, as manifested in the form of the surfaces of lakes, oceans, and atmospheric cloud/aerosols, as illustrated in Fig. 1. Atmospheric aerosols have typically a few micrometers in diameter, while cloud droplets and raindrops have 102 and 103 micrometers in diameter, respectively (13). It is well known that clouds play an important role in regulating surface precipitation and the atmospheric radiative balance, and hence influence Earth’s climate system (14). Aerosols are central to the formation of cloud droplets, meaning changes to the chemical properties of aerosols can act to impact cloud properties, precipitation, and cloud radiative effects.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Microdroplets in the natural environment. H2O2 is spontaneously produced in microdroplets with diameter of less than ∼20 µm, but not in bulk water.

Atmospheric aerosols, which have been found to contain a large number of chemical elements and a high content of organic material, also provide sites for chemical reactions to take place (1518). Both the air–water interface and the aqueous bulk interior of aerosols contribute to its overall effect. Atmospheric processes at the air–water interface following mechanisms that are quite different from those in the gas phase have recently been reported in the literature. One of the most significant of these reactions is that which leads to the formation of the ozone hole. During winter in the polar regions, aerosols grow to form polar stratospheric clouds, which offer a surface for chemical reactions to take place. These reactions convert HCl and ClONO2 molecules into the photochemically active chlorine and ultimately lead to the destruction of ozone in the stratosphere (16). Additionally, ab initio molecular dynamics simulation results show that the typical timescale for the reaction of the smallest Criegee intermediate, CH2OO, with water at the air–water interface is on the order of a few picoseconds, 2–3 orders of magnitude shorter than that in the gas phase. Interestingly, the loop-structure formation between CH2OO and water molecules is not a prerequisite for the stepwise mechanism observed on the air–water interface, and is not possible in the gas phase (17). Another feature of an aerosol is that it is a polar solvent, which could catalyze the trans to cis isomerization of glyoxal solvation at the air–water interface compared to the gas phase (18).

In PNAS, Lee et al. report experimental evidence that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is spontaneously produced from pure water by atomizing bulk water into microdroplets, which does not occur in bulk aqueous solutions.

H2O2 is an important chemical component involved in maintaining the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere (19). Furthermore, the reactions involving aqueous H2O2 play an important role in the chemistry of atmospheric aerosols. They include oxidation of S(IV) to S(VI), which is important in the formation of acid fog and acid rain. Gas-phase H2O2 in the atmosphere is mainly produced by the recombination of the HO2 radical. Alternately, the source of aqueous-phase H2O2 formation is still an open question, although simultaneous measurements show that raindrops contain H2O2 (20). Lee et al. confirmed that H2O2 is spontaneously generated in microdroplets with a diameter of <20 µm, which is the same size as atmospheric aerosols. Thus, their experimental results may help to understand a well-known fact of how nature behaves.

Lee et al. report a very interesting phenomena that gives important insight into the question of sources of H2O2. As with all innovations, it opens up some questions. OH recombination is suggested as the most likely source for the formation of H2O2 in the microdroplets, in which OH radical is generated by loss of an electron from OH due to the existence of strong electric field of the air–water interface of a microdroplet. Future studies will need to explore whether OH radicals can spontaneously form in a microdroplet in the absence of any added chemicals. Equally, the fate of the released electrons waiting to be found will need to be investigated if the OH radical is generated by loss of an electron from OH.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant CHE-1665324.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

See companion article on page 19294.

References

  • 1.Griffith E. C., Vaida V., In situ observation of peptide bond formation at the water-air interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 15697–15701 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fallah-Araghi A., et al. , Enhanced chemical synthesis at soft interfaces: A universal reaction-adsorption mechanism in microcompartments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 028301 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee J. K., Banerjee S., Nam H. G., Zare R. N., Acceleration of reaction in charged microdroplets. Q. Rev. Biophys. 48, 437–444 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wiebenga-Sanford B. P., DiVerdi J., Rithner C. D., Levinger N. E., Nanoconfinement’s dramatic impact on proton exchange between glucose and water. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 4597–4601 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Muñoz-Santiburcio D., Marx D., Chemistry in nanoconfined water. Chem. Sci. (Camb.) 8, 3444–3452 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nam I., Lee J. K., Nam H. G., Zare R. N., Abiotic production of sugar phosphates and uridine ribonucleoside in aqueous microdroplets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 12396–12400 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee J. K., Samanta D., Nam H. G., Zare R. N., Micrometer-sized water droplets induce spontaneous reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10585–10589 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee J. K., et al. , Spontaneous generation of hydrogen peroxide from aqueous microdroplets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 19294–19298 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campos-Martin J. M., Blanco-Brieva G., Fierro J. L. G., Hydrogen peroxide synthesis: An outlook beyond the anthraquinone process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45, 6962–6984 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kosaka K., et al. , Evaluation of the treatment performance of a multistage ozone/hydrogen peroxide process by decomposition by-products. Water Res. 35, 3587–3594 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang M. Z., Hsu H. J., Lee J. Y., Jeng J., Shiea J., Direct protein detection from biological media through electrospray-assisted laser desorption ionization/mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 5, 1107–1116 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Du S., Francisco J. S., Kais S., Study of electronic structure and dynamics of interacting free radicals influenced by water. J. Chem. Phys. 130, 124312 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Junge C., The size distribution and aging of natural aerosols as determined from electrical and optical data on the atmosphere. J. Meteorol. 12, 13–25 (1955). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fan J. W., Wang Y., Rosenfeld D., Liu X. H., Review of aerosol-cloud interactions: Mechanisms, significance, and challenges. J. Atmos. Sci. 73, 4221–4252 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dobson C. M., Ellison G. B., Tuck A. F., Vaida V., Atmospheric aerosols as prebiotic chemical reactors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 11864–11868 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Finlayson-Pitts B., Pitts J. J., “Homogeneous and heterogeneous chemistry in the stratosphere” in Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere (Academic, San Diego, CA, 2000), pp. 567–726. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhu C., et al. , New mechanistic pathways for Criegee-water chemistry at the air/water interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11164–11169 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu C., Kais S., Zeng X. C., Francisco J. S., Gladich I., Interfaces select specific stereochemical conformations: The isomerization of glyoxal at the liquid water interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 27–30 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vione D., Maurino V., Minero C., Pelizzetti E., The atmospheric chemistry of hydrogen peroxide: A review. Ann. Chim. 93, 477–488 (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moller D., Atmospheric hydrogen peroxide: Evidence for aqueous-phase formation from a historic perspective and a one-year measurement campaign. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5923–5936 (2009). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES