Abstract
Forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) is involved in lipid metabolisms. However, its role in chronic stress-related nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is unclear. The scientific premise of our study was based on the finding that FoxO1 expression is increased in the liver of mice after chronic stress. It is important to understand the mechanisms involved in the activation of FoxO1 and how its function affects the liver lipid deposition. We employed a murine chronic stress model, in which mice were treated by plantar electrical stimulation and restraint for 6 weeks, and a cellular model, in which Hepa1–6 cells were treated with corticosterone. We also used a pharmacologic approach as1842856, a highly specific FoxO1 inhibitor. Lipid metabolism related genes levels were measured by qRT-PCR and the lipid levels by biochemical detection. We show that the level of FoxO1 is significantly elevated in the liver of chronic stress mice. Transcription factor FoxO1 regulates a lipid synthesis phenotype of hepatocyte that is involved in the development and progression of NAFLD. We have shown that inhibition of FoxO1 induced phenotypic conversion of hepatocytes and down-regulates lipid synthesis genes expression by hepatocytes, which contribute to lipid deposition in NAFLD. At the cellular level, the inhibitor of FoxO1 as1842856 can also attenuate the lipid deposition of Hepa1–6 cells induced by corticosterone. Targeting FoxO1 is a novel therapeutic target for chronic stress-related NAFLD.
Keywords: Chronic stress, FoxO1, NAFLD, Lipid synthesis, Lipid deposition
Introduction
The incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is 20–30% globally (Henao-Mejia et al., 2012). The lipid deposition of the liver, especially the abnormal deposition of triglycerides (TG), is the basis of the pathogenesis of NAFLD (Piccinin, Villani & Moschetta, 2018). The correlation between the occurrence of NAFLD and chronic stress has received increasing attention in recent years (Ashtari, Pourhoseingholi & Zali, 2015). Our previous result and others’ studies have confirmed that chronic stress could lead to liver lipid deposition and inflammation, which lead to the development of NAFLD (Fu et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2014). However, the specific mechanism of chronic stress-induced liver lipid deposition is not clear.
Forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) is a member of the forkhead O family and plays a key role in lipid metabolism (Li et al., 2017). Activation of FoxO1 was detected during lipid deposition in the liver (Kim et al., 2016); activated FoxO1 was also found to lead to an increase in the output of very low-density lipoprotein (triglyceride-rich particles) in the liver, resulting in hypertriglyceridemia (Kim et al., 2011); the expression and activity of FoxO1 were increased in patients with NAFLD and correlated positively with the severity of the disease (Valenti et al., 2008). Matsumoto et al. (2006) found that the transfection of FoxO1 in the liver increased the TG content of the liver. Thus, we hypothesized that chronic stress leads to liver lipid deposition by activation of FoxO1. Our previous study demonstrated that chronic stress induces liver lipid deposition and FoxO1 activation in mice (Liu et al., 2014). However, the causal relationship between FoxO1 and liver lipid deposition during chronic stress is unclear. The molecular mechanisms of stress-induced lipid metabolism disorders are also unclear.
In this study, 6 weeks of plantar electrical stimulation and restraint were used to induce the mouse chronic stress. FoxO1 activity inhibitor as1842856 was used to verify the role of FoxO1 in this model. After 6-week stress exposure, we performed lipid deposition tests and measured TG synthesis genes and cholesterol metabolism-related genes to explore if and how FoxO1 influences the lipid deposition in a chronic stress animal model. It may provide new targets for drug prevention and treatment of stress-related lipid metabolic disorders.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and antibodies
Forkhead box O1 inhibitor (as1842856) and Cortisol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal calf serum was obtained from Hyclone (Logan, UT, USA). Penicillin and streptomycin were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). FoxO1, p-FoxO1, and β-Actin antibodies were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). IRDye 800CW donkey anti-goat and IRDye 800CW goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were both purchased from LI-COR Biosciences (LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The Real-time PCR reactions were performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara Biotechnology, Tokyo, Japan). Hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) and oil red O were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Science and Technology Company, Nanjing, China.
Animals and chronic stress protocols
C57BL/6J male mice, 5–7 weeks age, were purchased from Slaccas Laboratory Animal Company (Shanghai, China). Mice were housed in plastic home-cages in a temperature controlled room at 24 °C, under a 12:12 h illumination cycle (lights on at 8:00 AM). To stress animals, we used a modified version of the protocol described previously (Liu et al., 2014). For chronic stress, each mouse was administered electric foot shock (10:00, 7.5 s/2 min, 15 min, 25V) and restraint stress (19:00–21:00) every day for 42 consecutive days before evaluations. Non-stress mice (control group) remained in the home cage and kept isolated from stressed animals. FoxO1 inhibitor group were administered as1842856 at 30 mg/kg by gavage during the 42 days. The control group was treated with equal volume solvent by gavage. Animal’s weight and food intake were measured every week. All animal procedures used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Second Military Medical University (No. 20161027; Shanghai, China) and Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (SYXK-HU-2012-0003).
Hematoxylin–eosin and oil red O staining
Following fixation of the livers or cells with 10% formalin, livers were sliced and stained with H&E for histological examination. Hepatic lipid content was also determined by staining with Oil Red O (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Pictures were imaged with a Zeiss microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY, USA).
Biochemical analysis
The serum TG, total cholesterol (TC), and free fatty acid (FFA) were measured by an automatic biochemistry analyzer (7170; Hitachi, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan). Livers were homogenized at 4 °C in lysis buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris (pH 8.0), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate. Lipids from the total liver homogenate were extracted using the chloroform/methanol method (2:1), evaporated, and dissolved in 2-propanol. Amounts of TC and TG were measured by an automatic biochemistry analyzer (7170; Hitachi 7170, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan).
For glucose tolerance test, mice were fasted overnight and injected with two mg/g glucose/body weight. For insulin tolerance test, mice were fasted for 4 h and injected with one U/Kg insulin/body weight. The blood glucose levels were monitored at 30 min intervals for 2 h with an ACCU-CHEK Active Blood Glucose System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using tail tip blood samples. Serum insulin was determined by mouse insulin ELISA kit which was purchased from R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Cell culture
Mouse liver cancer Hepa1–6 cell lines (ATCC CRL-1830) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA). The medium contained 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 unit/mL penicillin and 100 g/mL streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere that contained 5% CO2. Cells were further administrated in DMEM containing one μM cortisol or one μM as1842856 for 48 h.
qRT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out using the One Step TB Green™ PrimeScript™ RT-PCR Kit (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) according to manufacturer’s instructions (Table 1). The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative expression level by normalizing to β-Actin levels (Zhao et al., 2019).
Table 1. Sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR.
Gene name | Sequence (5′–3′) |
---|---|
FoxO1-F1 | AGTGGATGGTGAAGAGCGTG |
FoxO1-R1 | GAAGGGACAGATTGTGGCGA |
Fasn-F1 | CAAGTGTCCACCAACAAGCG |
Fasn-R1 | GGAGCGCAGGATAGACTCAC |
Pepck-F1 | TGCGGATCATGACTCGGATG |
Pepck-R1 | AGGCCCAGTTGTTGACCAAA |
Scd1-F1 | GGCTAGCTATCTCTGCGCTC |
Scd1-R1 | GAACTGCGCTTGGAAACCTG |
HMGCoAR-F1 | ACGATCCTTCCTTATTGGCGG |
HMGCoAR-R1 | CTCCGGATCTCAATGGAGGC |
Fatp1-F1 | GGCAAGCTCCAGCACAGGAT |
Fatp1-R1 | ACCCACGTACACACAGAACG |
G6Pase-F1 | CGACTCGCTATCTCCAAGTGA |
G6Pase-R1 | GTTGAACCAGTCTCCGACCA |
SREBP1c-F1 | GATGTGCGAACTGGACACAG |
SREBP1c-R1 | CATAGGGGGCGTCAAACAG |
Cyp7a1-F1 | GGGATTGCTGTGGTAGTGAGC |
Cyp7a1-R1 | GGTATGGAATCAACCCGTTGTC |
Abcg1-F1 | CTTTCCTACTCTGTACCCGAGG |
Abcg1-R1 | CGGGGCATTCCATTGATAAGG |
Fabp1-F1 | ATGAACTTCTCCGGCAAGTACC |
Fabp1-R1 | CTGACACCCCCTTGATGTCC |
Cd36-F1 | ATGGGCTGTGATCGGAACTG |
Cd36-R1 | GTCTTCCCAATAAGCATGTCTCC |
Acc1-F1 | ATGGGCGGAATGGTCTCTTTC |
Acc1-R1 | TGGGGACCTTGTCTTCATCAT |
PPARα-F1 | AGAGCCCCATCTGTCCTCTC |
PPARα-R1 | ACTGGTAGTCTGCAAAACCAAA |
PPARγ-F1 | TCGCTGATGCACTGCCTATG |
PPARγ-R1 | GAGAGGTCCACAGAGCTGATT |
Pdk4-F1 | AGGGAGGTCGAGCTGTTCTC |
Pdk4-R1 | GGAGTGTTCACTAAGCGGTCA |
Cpt1a-F1 | CTCCGCCTGAGCCATGAAG |
Cpt1a-R1 | CACCAGTGATGATGCCATTCT |
Acox1-F1 | TAACTTCCTCACTCGAAGCCA |
Acox1-R1 | AGTTCCATGACCCATCTCTGTC |
Lcad-F1 | TCTTTTCCTCGGAGCATGACA |
Lcad-R1 | GACCTCTCTACTCACTTCTCCAG |
Mcad-F1 | AGGGTTTAGTTTTGAGTTGACGG |
Mcad-R1 | CCCCGCTTTTGTCATATTCCG |
Ucp2-F1 | TGCACTCCTGTGTTCTCCTG |
Ucp2-R1 | GGGACCTTCAATCGGCAAGA |
β-actin-F1 | TTCTTGGGTATGGAATCCTGT |
β-actin-R1 | AGCACTGTGTTGGCATAGAG |
Western blot analysis
Protein samples were prepared by lysing cells or tissues in modified RIPA buffer (1× PBS, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)). Lysates (50–100 μg) were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was probed with the specific primary antibody and secondary antibody and then quantified with Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) and Image J Software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA).
Statistical analysis
The data were presented as mean ± standard error and differences considered statistically significant only when p-values < 0.05. Data was mainly analyzed using a two-way ANOVA followed by uncorrected Fisher’s LSD post hoc test with GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was used to analyze the weight curves. Student’s t-test was applied to detect significant difference between two groups.
Results
As1842856 inhibited FoxO1 activation in the liver of chronic stress mice
The levels of FoxO1 protein and mRNA were significantly increased in the liver of mice after 6 weeks of stress, while the FoxO1 inhibitor as1842856 did not affect FoxO1 expression (Figs. 1A, 1B and 1E). The ratio of p-FoxO1 protein to FoxO1 was significantly decreased in the stress group (Figs. 1A and 1D) but significantly increased in the stress+as1842856 group. Phosphorylated FoxO1 protein is the inactive form of FoxO1 (Pan et al., 2017). The changes in the mRNA levels of PEPCK and G6Pase, the classical FoxO1 regulated target genes, were consistent with the changes in the activity of FoxO1 (Figs. 1F and 1G).
Effects of as1842856 on physiological index in mice after 6 weeks chronic stress
To investigate the effects of as1842856 on indexes of glucose metabolism and food intake, we compared these physiological indexes. During the stress period, the body weight and food intake of the control group increased slowly and steadily, while the stress group did not increase significantly. At the 6th week of stress, the body weight of the stress group was significantly lower than that of the control group (Fig. 2A). The food intake at the 5th week of stress also decreased significantly (Fig. 2B). There was no significant difference in body weight and food intake between the control group and the as1842856 group. We also tested fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, insulin, glucose tolerance, and insulin tolerance in four groups of mice after 6 weeks of stress. The results showed no significant difference between the four groups (Figs. 2C–2G).
As1842856 reduced adipogenesis in the liver of chronic stress mice
After 6 weeks of stress, H&E staining of livers in mice showed hepatocyte fatty degeneration: enlarged hepatocytes, loose and reticular cytoplasm, individual cytoplasm was transparent, and shaped like a balloon (Fig. 3A). Oil red O staining showed brownish red lipid droplet formation (Fig. 3A). FoxO1 inhibitor as1842856 significantly reduced the lipid deposition induced by chronic stress (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, the morphology of hepatocytes in the livers of mice fed with as1842856 still displayed normal architecture around the central veins (Fig. 3A). We further quantified the TG and cholesterol levels in the livers of mice. The results showed that FoxO1 inhibitors significantly reduced the liver TG content induced by chronic stress, while cholesterol content had no significant change (Figs. 3B and 3C).
The levels of serum TG (Fig. 3D) and FFA (Fig. 3E, p < 0.001) were significantly increased in the chronic stress group. Both TG and FFA were significantly reduced in the stress+as1842856 group compared with the stress group (Figs. 3D and 3E). There was no statistical difference in serum cholesterol after chronic stress and as1842856 treatment (Fig. 3F).
Effects of as1842856 on the mRNA expression of lipoprotein metabolism-related genes in mice after 6 weeks of chronic stress
The mRNA expression of fatty acid synthase (FASN) was significantly increased in the chronic stress group compared with the control group (Fig. 4A). However, the mRNA expression of FASN in the stress+as1842856 group was significantly decreased compared with the stress group (Fig. 4A). There were no significant differences between the four groups in ACC1 or SCD1 (Figs. 4B and 4C). The mRNA expression of fatty acid transporter protein (FATP) and fatty acid binding protein (FABP) in the chronic stress group was significantly increased compared with the control group (Figs. 4D and 4E). As1842856 significantly decreased the mRNA expression of FATP and FABP, which was elevated by the chronic stress (Figs. 4D and 4E). There were no significant differences in the other synthetically-related gene, CD36 (Fig. 4F). We also found no statistically significant differences in the mRNA expression of genes related to fatty acid oxidation, such as PPARα, Acox1, Lcad, Mcad, Pdk4, Cpt1a, and Ucp2 (Figs. 4G–4N).
Effects of as1842856 on the mRNA expression of cholesterol metabolism-related genes in mice after 6 weeks of chronic stress
We found that the mRNA expression of HMG-CoAR and CYP7A1 was significantly increased in the stress group. The mRNA expression of HMG-CoAR and CYP7A1 in the stress+as1842856 group was significantly lower than that in the stress group (Figs. 5A and 5B). However, there was no statistical difference in the synthetic-related gene cholesterol-regulating element binding transcription factor 1C (SREBP-1c) and the cholesterol transport-related gene ABCG1 (Figs. 5C and 5D).
As1842856 inhibited FoxO1 activation in the Hepa1–6 cells after corticosterone treatment
We also demonstrated the effect of as1842856 on FoxO1 activation and adipogenesis in the Hepa1–6 cells. The levels of FoxO1 protein and mRNA were significantly increased in the corticosterone group, compared with the control group (Figs. 6A–6C). The p-FoxO1 protein and the p-FoxO1/FoxO1 ratio were also significantly decreased after corticosterone treatment (Figs. 6A–6D). The FoxO1 inhibitor as1842856 significantly increased the p-FoxO1 protein and p-FoxO1/FoxO1 value (Figs. 6A–6D). The change of the classical target gene PEPCK regulated by FoxO1 was consistent with the change of FoxO1 activity (Figs. 6E and 6F).
As1842856 reduced adipogenesis in the Hepa1–6 cells after corticosterone treatment
After treatment with one μM of corticosterone for 48 h, oil red O staining indicated that most Hepa1–6 cells showed obvious brown-red lipid droplets. The corticosterone+as1842856 group showed no obvious lipid droplets (Fig. 7A).
Fatty acid synthase mRNA expression was significantly increased in the corticosterone group compared with the control group (Fig. 7B). The corticosterone+as1842856 group showed a significant decrease in FASN mRNA expression compared with the corticosterone group (Fig. 7B). Other synthetically related genes, ACC1 and SCD1 showed no significant difference between the four groups (Figs. 7C and 7D).
Discussion
This study demonstrated that chronic stress induced lipid deposition in the livers of mice, which were mainly TG. Liver TG synthesis genes and FFA uptake genes were significantly upregulated in mRNA levels after chronic stress. These changes can be blocked by as1842856, the inhibitor of FoxO1. Moreover, at the cellular level, the changes in lipid metabolism of Hepa1–6 cells induced by corticosterone are basically the same as those in animal chronic stress experiments. The inhibitor of FoxO1 as1842856 also attenuated the lipid deposition of Hepa1–6 cells induced by corticosterone. Our study confirms the important regulatory role of FoxO1 in stress-induced lipid metabolism disorders.
Chronic stress refers to continuous physical or psychological forms of tension and pressure. Macedo et al. (2012) found that the chronic stress model mice, created by a narrow living environment and high-calorie diets, gained less weight than normal-fed mice. However, there was no difference between the two groups on the ratios of body weight to body length. It is suggested that mice fed a high-calorie diet may have abdominal obesity. Czech et al. (2013) found that chronic stress model mice caused by crowded communities have significant oxidative stress and inflammatory response in the liver under normal feeding conditions. Our previous study (Liu et al., 2014) found that liver index (total liver/body weight × 100) and liver TG levels increased significantly in chronic stress model (sustained foot stimulation and tethered for 12 weeks) mice. Hepatic cell adipose degeneration was found by liver section staining. Although the stress patterns and models described above are different, they all suggest that stress is associated with hepatic steatosis and inflammatory response.
According to our previous results and related literature reports (Kim et al., 2017; Shin et al., 2015; Yamamoto et al., 2002), we used a combination of plantar electrical stimulation and restraint stress to construct a stress model. After 6 weeks of continuous stress, model mice liver TG levels were significantly elevated. Liver fatty degeneration was also demonstrated by the liver section staining. It indicated that chronic stress causes lipid deposition in the livers of mice, and the model was successfully constructed. It is consistent with the results of our previous study (Liu et al., 2014).
The possible mechanism of stress-induced hepatic lipid deposition is considered to be related to long-term activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal cortex (HPA) axis (Van Bodegom, Homberg & Henckens, 2017). The activated HPA axis releases glucocorticoids. On the one hand, glucocorticoids enhance the decomposition of lipolysis hormones, promote the decomposition of adipose tissue, and release a large amount of FFA into the blood. On the other hand, glucocorticoids promote lipid formation and deposition of hepatocytes. At the same time, the hippocampus has an inhibitory effect on HPA axis activation. Under long-term chronic stress, a large number of hippocampal neurons undergo dysfunction or death by the chronically elevated glucocorticoids, losing their inhibitory effect on the HPA axis, and leading to the massive release of glucocorticoids (Kim, Moon & Park, 2013; Sakamoto et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2014). In our study, the FFA content in the blood increased significantly after chronic stress. Corticosterone or cortisol is the main hormone of the pituitary adrenocortical axis secreted by the adrenal cortex in response to environmental challenges (McEwen, 2007; Quijije, 2015; Kant et al., 1987). At the same time, we also investigated the effect of corticosterone in hepatocyte lipid deposition. Lipid droplets were found in Hepa1–6 cells, which were treated with corticosterone for 48 h. This suggests that chronic stress may cause liver lipid deposition by elevating the corticosterone level.
Our previous experiments found that FoxO1 may be involved in stress-induced lipid metabolism disorders. FoxO1 is a member of the FOXO transcription factor. FOXO is widely expressed in a variety of tissues, including the liver, and is a key effector molecule in cell homeostasis, metabolism, and stress response (Ma et al., 2018). It acts as a pre-transcriptional regulator that binds to chromatin (Riedel et al., 2013; Zaret & Carroll, 2011) and initiates or inhibits transcription (Furuyama et al., 2000; Ramaswamy et al., 2002; Webb et al., 2013). FoxO1 is a typical forkhead protein transcription factor, a key signaling molecule downstream of the insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 signal and has been shown to be involved in the regulation of glucose metabolism (O’Neill et al., 2016). FoxO1 binds to adjacent sites in the insulin response elements within the insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) promoters to initiate gene activation (Nakae et al., 2001a; Matsumoto et al., 2007; Yeagley et al., 2001). Active nuclear FOXO1 also binds the transcriptional coactivator peroxisome proliferative activated receptor-γ coactivator 1-α (PGC1α) to coordinate a gluconeogenic transcriptional program involving increased expression of G6Pase and cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Pck1) (Puigserver et al., 2003; Nakae et al., 2001b). In addition, FOXOs mediate the effects of insulin on adipocyte differentiation, neuropeptide transcription and processing, and β-cell health (Nakae et al., 2003; Ren et al., 2012; Plum et al., 2009). In recent years, an increasing number studies have shown that FoxO1 is also involved in the regulation of lipid metabolism in the liver. These studies have found that activation of FoxO1 was observed in lipid deposition in the liver (Kim et al., 2016); activated FoxO1 induced an increase in liver output of very low-density lipoprotein (rich in TG particles) and hypertriglyceridemia (Kim et al., 2011). This study also indicated that FoxO1 does participate in liver lipid deposition caused by chronic stress. On the one hand, we observed changes in FoxO1 protein, mRNA, and phosphorylation levels in stressed mice; on the other hand, liver lipid deposition due to chronic stress is alleviated after the treatment of the FoxO1 activity inhibitor.
To further clarify how FoxO1 regulates liver lipid deposition, this experiment examined the expression levels of genes involved in liver and lipid metabolism. Previous experiments have confirmed that the main component of lipid deposition caused by chronic stress is TG, and the amount of TG in the liver is inseparable from the uptake and synthesis of FFA (Liu et al., 2014). FASN is a key enzyme for the de novo synthesis of endogenous fatty acids and is closely related to lipid metabolism (Jones & Infante, 2015). FASN mRNA and protein levels were significantly upregulated in fatty liver (Huang, Gusdon & Qu, 2013). Upregulation of FASN in rat liver is involved in the formation of fatty liver. The FATP family and the FABP family are important protein families that take up fatty acids and are primarily responsible for the transport of extracellular FFA uptake. Studies have confirmed that fatty acid uptake is significantly reduced in hepatocytes of FATP knockout mice (Falcon et al., 2010). Purified FATP1 exhibits long-chain and ultra-long-chain fatty acyl-CoA synthetase activity (Hall, Smith & Bernlohr, 2003). FABP can be activated by long-chain FA, PPARs, and toll-like receptor agonists, which are involved in sugar, lipid metabolism, and inflammatory processes (Doege et al., 2006; Tan et al., 2002; Wolfrum et al., 2001). This study found that FoxO1 increases fatty acid synthesis and intra-hepatic transport of FFA by increasing the expression of FASN, FATP, and FABP and increasing liver TG deposition. ACC1 and SCD1 are two other key enzymes involved in lipogenesis (29925265). ACC1 and SCD1 showed no significant difference between the four groups. This suggested that the expression of FASN, FTAP, and FABP, but not ACC1 or SCD1, are controlled by the transcription factor FoxO1. We also found that FoxO1 did not affect the feeding of mice and fatty acid oxidation in the liver. FoxO1 is a key molecule downstream of insulin, which regulates glucose metabolism. However, chronic stress mice did not show significant glucose metabolism abnormalities in this experiment. We speculate that mice may still be in a compensatory period due to the relatively short stress time. This conclusion requires further experiments to prove by a longer-term chronic stress test.
Conclusions
In summary, this study demonstrated that chronic stress induced FoxO1 activation and lipid deposition in the livers of mice. Inhibition of FoxO1 attenuated the TG synthesis and fatty acid oxidation induced by the chronic stress. Corticosterone may act as a mediator between FoxO1 and chronic stress. The present study indicated that inhibition of FoxO1 may have therapeutic benefits for chronic stress relative fatty liver disease.
Supplemental Information
Funding Statement
This research was fully funded by the Natural Science Fund of Shanghai (17ZR1437800) (Yun-zi LIu), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31871171 and 81571169) (Chun-lei Jiang), and (81703267) (Ji-kuai Chen). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Yun-zi Liu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Wei Peng conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Ji-kuai Chen performed the experiments, approved the final draft.
Wen-jun Su analyzed the data, approved the final draft.
Wen-jie Yan contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.
Yun-xia Wang approved the final draft.
Chun-lei Jiang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Animal Ethics
The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):
All animal procedures used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Second Military Medical University (No. 20161027, Shanghai, China) and the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (SYXK-HU-2012-0003).
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.
References
- Ashtari, Pourhoseingholi & Zali (2015).Ashtari S, Pourhoseingholi MA, Zali MR. Non-alcohol fatty liver disease in Asia: prevention and planning. World Journal of Hepatology. 2015;7(13):1788–1796. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i13.1788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Czech et al. (2013).Czech B, Neumann ID, Muller M, Reber SO, Hellerbrand C. Effect of chronic psychosocial stress on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2013;6(8):1585–1593. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doege et al. (2006).Doege H, Baillie RA, Ortegon AM, Tsang B, Wu Q, Punreddy S, Hirsch D, Watson N, Gimeno RE, Stahl A. Targeted deletion of FATP5 reveals multiple functions in liver metabolism: alterations in hepatic lipid homeostasis. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(4):1245–1258. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falcon et al. (2010).Falcon A, Doege H, Fluitt A, Tsang B, Watson N, Kay MA, Stahl A. FATP2 is a hepatic fatty acid transporter and peroxisomal very long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2010;299(3):E384–E393. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00226.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu et al. (2010).Fu JH, Sun HS, Wang Y, Zheng WQ, Shi ZY, Wang QJ. The effects of a fat- and sugar-enriched diet and chronic stress on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in male Wistar rats. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2010;55(8):2227–2236. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1019-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Furuyama et al. (2000).Furuyama T, Nakazawa T, Nakano I, Mori N. Identification of the differential distribution patterns of mRNAs and consensus binding sequences for mouse DAF-16 homologues. Biochemical Journal. 2000;349(2):629–634. doi: 10.1042/bj3490629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall, Smith & Bernlohr (2003).Hall AM, Smith AJ, Bernlohr DA. Characterization of the Acyl-CoA synthetase activity of purified murine fatty acid transport protein 1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(44):43008–43013. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306575200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henao-Mejia et al. (2012).Henao-Mejia J, Elinav E, Jin C, Hao L, Mehal WZ, Strowig T, Thaiss CA, Kau AL, Eisenbarth SC, Jurczak MJ, Camporez JP, Shulman GI, Gordon JI, Hoffman HM, Flavell RA. Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature. 2012;482(7384):179–185. doi: 10.1038/nature10809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Gusdon & Qu (2013).Huang YY, Gusdon AM, Qu S. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: molecular pathways and therapeutic strategies. Lipids in Health and Disease. 2013;12(1):171. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones & Infante (2015).Jones SF, Infante JR. Molecular pathways: fatty acid synthase. Clinical Cancer Research. 2015;21(24):5434–5438. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kant et al. (1987).Kant GJ, Leu JR, Anderson SM, Mougey EH. Effects of chronic stress on plasma corticosterone, ACTH and prolactin. Physiology & Behavior. 1987;40(6):775–779. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90282-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim et al. (2016).Kim DH, Lee B, Kim MJ, Park MH, An HJ, Lee EK, Chung KW, Park JW, Yu BP, Choi JS, Chung HY. Molecular mechanism of betaine on hepatic lipid metabolism: inhibition of Forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) binding to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2016;64(36):6819–6825. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Moon & Park (2013).Kim SH, Moon IS, Park IS. Unique hippocampal changes and allodynia in a model of chronic stress. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2013;28(6):946–950. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim et al. (2017).Kim JY, Yang SH, Kwon J, Lee HW, Kim H. Mice subjected to uncontrollable electric shocks show depression-like behaviors irrespective of their state of helplessness. Behavioural Brain Research. 2017;322:138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim et al. (2011).Kim DH, Zhang T, Ringquist S, Dong HH. Targeting FoxO1 for hypertriglyceridemia. Current Drug Targets. 2011;12(9):1245–1255. doi: 10.2174/138945011796150262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2017).Li Y, Ma Z, Jiang S, Hu W, Li T, Di S, Wang D, Yang Y. A global perspective on FOXO1 in lipid metabolism and lipid-related diseases. Progress in Lipid Research. 2017;66:42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2017.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu et al. (2014).Liu YZ, Chen JK, Zhang Y, Wang X, Qu S, Jiang CL. Chronic stress induces steatohepatitis while decreases visceral fat mass in mice. BMC Gastroenterology. 2014;14(1):106. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma et al. (2018).Ma J, Matkar S, He X, Hua X. FOXO family in regulating cancer and metabolism. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2018;50:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macedo et al. (2012).Macedo IC, Medeiros LF, Oliveira C, Oliveira CM, Rozisky JR, Scarabelot VL, Souza A, Silva FR, Santos VS, Cioato SG, Caumo W, Torres IL. Cafeteria diet-induced obesity plus chronic stress alter serum leptin levels. Peptides. 2012;38(1):189–196. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsumoto et al. (2006).Matsumoto M, Han S, Kitamura T, Accili D. Dual role of transcription factor FoxO1 in controlling hepatic insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2006;116:2464–2472. doi: 10.1172/JCI27047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsumoto et al. (2007).Matsumoto M, Pocai A, Rossetti L, Depinho RA, Accili D. Impaired regulation of hepatic glucose production in mice lacking the forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 in liver. Cell Metabolism. 2007;6(3):208–216. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McEwen (2007).McEwen BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews. 2007;87(3):873–904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakae et al. (2003).Nakae J, Kitamura T, Kitamura Y, Biggs WH, III, Arden KC, Accili D. The forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 regulates adipocyte differentiation. Developmental Cell. 2003;4(1):119–129. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00401-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakae et al. (2001a).Nakae J, Kitamura T, Silver DL, Accili D. The forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 (Fkhr) confers insulin sensitivity onto glucose-6-phosphatase expression. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2001a;108(9):1359–1367. doi: 10.1172/JCI200112876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakae et al. (2001b).Nakae J, Kitamura T, Silver DL, Accili D. The forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 (Fkhr) confers insulin sensitivity onto glucose-6-phosphatase expression. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2001b;108(9):1359–1367. doi: 10.1172/JCI200112876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Neill et al. (2016).O’Neill BT, Lee KY, Klaus K, Softic S, Krumpoch MT, Fentz J, Stanford KI, Robinson MM, Cai W, Kleinridders A, Pereira RO, Hirshman MF, Abel ED, Accili D, Goodyear LJ, Nair KS, Kahn CR. Insulin and IGF-1 receptors regulate FoxO-mediated signaling in muscle proteostasis. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2016;126(9):3433–3446. doi: 10.1172/JCI86522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan et al. (2017).Pan CW, Jin X, Zhao Y, Pan Y, Yang J, Karnes RJ, Zhang J, Wang L, Huang H. AKT-phosphorylated FOXO1 suppresses ERK activation and chemoresistance by disrupting IQGAP1-MAPK interaction. EMBO Journal. 2017;36(8):995–1010. doi: 10.15252/embj.201695534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piccinin, Villani & Moschetta (2018).Piccinin E, Villani G, Moschetta A. Metabolic aspects in NAFLD, NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of PGC1 coactivators. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;16:160–174. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plum et al. (2009).Plum L, Lin HV, Dutia R, Tanaka J, Aizawa KS, Matsumoto M, Kim AJ, Cawley NX, Paik JH, Loh YP, DePinho RA, Wardlaw SL, Accili D. The obesity susceptibility gene Cpe links FoxO1 signaling in hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin neurons with regulation of food intake. Nature Medicine. 2009;15(10):1195–1201. doi: 10.1038/nm.2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Puigserver et al. (2003).Puigserver P, Rhee J, Donovan J, Walkey CJ, Yoon JC, Oriente F, Kitamura Y, Altomonte J, Dong H, Accili D, Spiegelman BM. Insulin-regulated hepatic gluconeogenesis through FOXO1–PGC-1α interaction. Nature. 2003;423(6939):550–555. doi: 10.1038/nature01667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quijije (2015).Quijije N. Updates in the neuroendocrinology of stress and its clinical management. Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity. 2015;22(4):319–324. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramaswamy et al. (2002).Ramaswamy S, Nakamura N, Sansal I, Bergeron L, Sellers WR. A novel mechanism of gene regulation and tumor suppression by the transcription factor FKHR. Cancer Cell. 2002;2(1):81–91. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00086-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren et al. (2012).Ren H, Orozco IJ, Su Y, Suyama S, Gutiérrez-Juárez R, Horvath TL, Wardlaw SL, Plum L, Arancio O, Accili D. FoxO1 target Gpr17 activates AgRP neurons to regulate food intake. Cell. 2012;149(6):1314–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riedel et al. (2013).Riedel CG, Dowen RH, Lourenco GF, Kirienko NV, Heimbucher T, West JA, Bowman SK, Kingston RE, Dillin A, Asara JM, Ruvkun G. DAF-16 employs the chromatin remodeller SWI/SNF to promote stress resistance and longevity. Nature Cell Biology. 2013;15(5):491–501. doi: 10.1038/ncb2720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakamoto et al. (2015).Sakamoto Y, Ogawa T, Ogawa M, Matsuo Y, Hashikawa N, Hashikawa N. Effects of 15-day chronic stress on behavior and neurological changes in the hippocampus of ICR mice. YAKUGAKU ZASSHI. 2015;135(1):151–158. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin et al. (2015).Shin S, Kwon O, Kang JI, Kwon S, Oh S, Choi J, Kim CH, Kim DG. mGluR5 in the nucleus accumbens is critical for promoting resilience to chronic stress. Nature Neuroscience. 2015;18(7):1017–1024. doi: 10.1038/nn.4028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan et al. (2002).Tan NS, Shaw NS, Vinckenbosch N, Liu P, Yasmin R, Desvergne B, Wahli W, Noy N. Selective cooperation between fatty acid binding proteins and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in regulating transcription. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2002;22(14):5114–5127. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.14.5114-5127.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valenti et al. (2008).Valenti L, Rametta R, Dongiovanni P, Maggioni M, Fracanzani AL, Zappa M, Lattuada E, Roviaro G, Fargion S. Increased expression and activity of the transcription factor FOXO1 in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Diabetes. 2008;57(5):1355–1362. doi: 10.2337/db07-0714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Bodegom, Homberg & Henckens (2017).Van Bodegom M, Homberg JR, Henckens MJAG. Modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by early life stress exposure. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2017;11:87. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webb et al. (2013).Webb AE, Pollina EA, Vierbuchen T, Urbán N, Ucar D, Leeman DS, Martynoga B, Sewak M, Rando TA, Guillemot F, Wernig M, Brunet A. FOXO3 shares common targets with ASCL1 genome-wide and inhibits ASCL1-dependent neurogenesis. Cell Reports. 2013;4(3):477–491. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfrum et al. (2001).Wolfrum C, Borrmann CM, Borchers T, Spener F. Fatty acids and hypolipidemic drugs regulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α- and γ-mediated gene expression via liver fatty acid binding protein: a signaling path to the nucleus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(5):2323–2328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051619898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto et al. (2002).Yamamoto K, Takeshita K, Shimokawa T, Yi H, Isobe K, Loskutoff DJ, Saito H. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 is a major stress-regulated gene: implications for stress-induced thrombosis in aged individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(2):890–895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022608799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yeagley et al. (2001).Yeagley D, Guo S, Unterman T, Quinn PG. Gene- and activation-specific mechanisms for insulin inhibition of basal and glucocorticoid-induced insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase transcription. Roles of forkhead and insulin response sequences. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(36):33705–33710. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101215200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaret & Carroll (2011).Zaret KS, Carroll JS. Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. Genes & Development. 2011;25(21):2227–2241. doi: 10.1101/gad.176826.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao et al. (2019).Zhao Q, Wang Q, Wang J, Tang M, Huang S, Peng K, Han Y, Zhang J, Liu G, Fang Q, You Z. Maternal immune activation-induced PPARγ-dependent dysfunction of microglia associated with neurogenic impairment and aberrant postnatal behaviors in offspring. Neurobiology of Disease. 2019;125:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu et al. (2014).Zhu LJ, Liu MY, Li H, Liu X, Chen C, Han Z, Wu HY, Jing X, Zhou HH, Suh H, Zhu DY, Zhou QG. The different roles of glucocorticoids in the hippocampus and hypothalamus in chronic stress-induced HPA axis hyperactivity. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(5):e97689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.