Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanometer-sized membranous vesicles used for primitive cell-to-cell communication. We previously reported that colon cancer-derived EVs contain abundant miR-92a-3p and have a pro-angiogenic function. We previously identified Dickkopf-3 (Dkk-3) as a direct target of miR-92a-3p; however, the pro-angiogenic function of miR-92a-3p cannot only be attributed to downregulation of Dkk-3. Therefore, the complete molecular mechanism by which miR-92a-3p exerts pro-angiogenic effects is still unclear. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the gene sets affected by ectopic expression of miR-92a-3p in endothelial cells to elucidate processes underlying EV-induced angiogenesis. We found that the ectopic expression of miR-92a-3p upregulated cell cycle- and mitosis-related gene expression and downregulated adhesion-related gene expression in endothelial cells. We also identified a novel target gene of miR-92a-3p, claudin-11. Claudin-11 belongs to the claudin gene family, which encodes essential components expressed at tight junctions (TJs). Disruption of TJs with a concomitant loss of claudin expression is a significant event in the process of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Our findings have unveiled a new EV-mediated mechanism for tumor angiogenesis through the induction of partial endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in endothelial cells.
Keywords: extracellular vesicle, miR-92a-3p, angiogenesis, claudin-11
1. Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that inhibit gene expression in a posttranscriptional manner. The mRNAs complementarily matched to the seed position (nucleotides 2–8) of miRNAs have the potential to be under miRNA regulation. Therefore, in theory, a single miRNA strand has the potential to regulate more than 200 target mRNAs. Today, over 2000 miRNAs have been identified in the human genome and more than 30% of our gene sets are predicted to be conserved targets for miRNA regulation [1]. A large body of evidence has documented that miRNAs play a critical role in various biological processes, including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. While the majority of miRNAs exist and work within cells, recent studies have shown that miRNAs also exist in the bodily fluids packed within extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are membranous vesicular structures derived from endosomes or the plasma membrane. These miRNAs are called circulating miRNAs and are considered novel mediators of intercellular communication. Indeed, recent accumulating evidence suggests that cancer cells secrete large amounts of EVs, transmit functional EV cargo to recipient cells, and manipulate the tumor microenvironment. EVs and their cargo are now highlighted as significant players in cancer development, progression, and metastasis. Among them, miR-92a-3p has been identified as a miRNA present in the plasma that is significantly upregulated in colon cancer patients compared with healthy individuals, suggesting that miR-92a-3p could be a potential noninvasive biomarker for colon cancer [2]. In our previous study, we showed that miR-92a-3p expression in the plasma is significantly downregulated after colon tumor resection [3]. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the EVs secreted by colon cancer are enriched with miR-92a-3p and promote angiogenesis, as indicated by increased proliferation, motility, and tube formation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) through the inhibition of Dickkopf-3 (Dkk-3) expression [4]. However, this observation just described a function of EVs and/or miR-92a-3p and the detailed molecular mechanism by which EVs and/or miR-92a-3p exerts pro-angiogenic effects is still unclear. Therefore, in this study, we performed high-throughput analysis of gene sets affected by the ectopic expression of miR-92a-3p to understand, as a whole, the processes occurring in endothelial cells that incorporate EVs. Our findings suggest a new EV-based mechanism underlying how colon cancer influences surrounding cells and progresses.
2. Results
2.1. Colon Cancer Cells Actively Secrete MiR-92a-3p via EVs
Previously, we demonstrated that miR-92a-3p is significantly upregulated in colon carcinoma tissues compared with colon adenoma tissues [4]. Furthermore, a significantly abundant amount of miR-92a-3p was found to exist in the plasma of colon cancer patients and xenografted mice, suggesting specific functions in the extracellular space of colon cancer. As shown in Figure 1A, miR-92a-3p expression was significantly upregulated in colon cancer cell lines compared with normal colon mucosa. Furthermore, miR-92a-3p levels in the extracellular space (packed within the EVs) were significantly higher than those within the cells (Figure 1B). These results indicate that colon cancer cells actively release miR-92a-3p via EVs. To further characterize the EVs derived from DLD-1 cells, the protein expression profiles of EVs were examined. CD63, CD81, and TSG101 are often used as identification markers for exosomes. Flotillin-1, a lipid raft-associated membranous protein, and actinin-4, a cytoskeletal protein, are used as markers for shed-microvesicles [5]. Western blot analysis demonstrated that CD63, CD81, and TSG101 were predominantly expressed in EVs compared with their paired cells (Figure 1D). As shown in Figure 1C, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) revealed that the average size of DLD-1 cell-derived EVs was 82.8 ± 36.4 nm. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was also used to visualize the membranous vesicular morphology of EVs, and their sizes were found to be mostly smaller than 150 nm in diameter (Figure 1E). All these results indicate that the EVs collected from DLD-1 cells are mainly exosomes (30–150 nm).
2.2. EVs and MiR-92a-3p Promote Proliferation, Migration, and Tube Formation in HUVECs
Manipulation of a recipient cell’s phenotype can be achieved depending on the efficiency of EV uptake and transfer of its cargo. According to this theory, we first confirmed the presence of EV uptake by incubating HUVECs with fluorescence-labeled EVs derived from DLD-1 cells. As shown in Figure 2A, the labeled EVs were visualized as green dot-like shapes. The largest number of green dots was observed 16 h after the incubation started. The green dots were mainly localized around the nuclei of the HUVECs. After the 16 h time point, the number of green dots gradually decreased until 24 h post incubation (data not shown). This observation indicates that DLD-1 cell-derived EVs can be efficiently incorporated into HUVECs. Furthermore, the incorporated EVs significantly promoted the proliferation of HUVECs (Figure 2B) and also increased the intracellular levels of miR-92a-3p in HUVECs (Figure 2C). Ectopic expression of miR-92a-3p in HUVECs produced the same results (Figure 2D,E). Additionally, the incorporated EVs significantly promoted migration and tube formation in HUVECs (Figure 2F,G). Ectopic expression of miR-92a-3p in HUVECs also reproduced those results (Figure 2H,I), as previously demonstrated [4]. These findings indicate that the EVs containing miR-92a-3p secreted by colon cancer cells induce a pro-angiogenic phenotype in endothelial cells.
2.3. MiR-92a-3p Upregulates Cell-Cycle- and Mitosis-Related Genes and Downregulates Adhesion-Related Genes in HUVECs
After confirmation of the phenomena mentioned above, cDNA microarray analysis of the HUVECs transfected with miR-92a-3p versus those transfected with nonspecific control miRNA was performed. Figure 3A is a heatmap showing the expression patterns of 1232 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the two conditions (HUVECs transfected with miR-92a-3p or nonspecific control miRNA). Among them, we observed more than a four-fold upregulation or downregulation of DEGs by miR-92a-3p compared with the control, as summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. As shown in Table 1, the expression of mitosis- and cell-cycle-related genes was upregulated, including that of KIF15 (Gene Ontology (GO):0007018 microtubule-based movement, GO:0007067 mitosis, and GO:0008283 cell proliferation) and DSCC1 (GO:0006260 DNA replication, GO:0007049 cell cycle, and GO:0034088 maintenance of mitotic sister chromatid cohesion). Signaling through G protein-coupled receptors, which are involved in cancer biology including vascular remolding, invasion, and migration, was also activated, as indicated by the upregulation of RGS7 (GO:0007186 G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway and GO:0007242 intracellular signaling cascade) and C14orf174 (GO:0007186 G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway). As shown in Table 2, the target genes of miR-92a-3p that have previously been validated, including Dkk-3 [4,6], CD69 [7], and Integrin subunit alpha 5 (ITGA5) [8], were present in the four-fold downregulated gene list. The results of the modular enrichment analysis of the upregulated or downregulated DEGs by miR-92a-3p are summarized in Figure 3B. The upregulated DEGs were enriched in “cell cycle”, “mitosis”, and “cell division, mitosis”. The downregulated DEGs were enriched in “signal transduction”, “immune response”, “cytokine-mediated signaling pathway”, “cell adhesion”, and “proteolysis”.
Table 1.
No. | Gene Name | Symbol | RefSeq ID | Fold Change (miR-92a-3p/Control) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | regulator of G-protein signaling 7 | RGS7 | NM_001282773.1 | 6.940 |
2 | sterile alpha motif domain containing 15 | SAMD15 | NM_001010860.1 | 6.147 |
3 | brain expressed X-linked 1 | BEX1 | NM_018476.3 | 6.144 |
4 | Yip1 interacting factor homolog B, membrane trafficking protein | YIF1B | NM_001145461.1 | 5.812 |
5 | IQ motif containing D | IQCD | XM_011537864.1 | 5.713 |
6 | leukemia NUP98 fusion partner 1 | LNP1 | NM_001085451.1 | 5.566 |
7 | phosphorylase kinase, alpha 2 (liver) | PHKA2 | NM_000292.2 | 5.448 |
8 | olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily T member 1 | OR2T1 | NM_030904.1 | 5.130 |
9 | chromosome 15 open reading frame 48 | C15orf48 | NM_197955.2 | 5.092 |
10 | kinesin family member 15 | KIF15 | NM_020242.2 | 4.765 |
11 | dual adaptor of phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphoinositides | DAPP1 | NM_001306151.1 | 4.626 |
12 | DNA replication and sister chromatid cohesion 1 | DSCC1 | XM_005251065.2 | 4.596 |
13 | proline/serine-rich coiled-coil 1 | PSRC1 | XM_011542306.1 | 4.579 |
14 | glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 2, mitochondrial | GPAT2 | NM_207328.2 | 4.511 |
15 | olfactory receptor, family 10, subfamily G, member 6 | OR10G6 | - | 4.497 |
16 | TYMS opposite strand | TYMSOS | NM_001012716.2 | 4.448 |
17 | apolipoprotein O | APOO | NR_026545.2 | 4.444 |
18 | membrane protein, palmitoylated 3 | MPP3 | XM_006721917.2 | 4.340 |
19 | TNF alpha induced protein 8 like 2 | TNFAIP8L2 | NM_024575.4 | 4.338 |
20 | WD repeat domain 63 | WDR63 | NM_001288563.1 | 4.328 |
21 | pleckstrin | PLEK | NM_002664.2 | 4.324 |
22 | solute carrier family 7 member 14 | SLC7A14 | NM_020949.2 | 4.306 |
23 | MCM3AP antisense RNA 1 | MCM3AP-AS1 | NR_110565.1 | 4.220 |
24 | zinc finger protein 114 | ZNF114 | NM_001301062.1 | 4.210 |
25 | zinc finger RNA binding protein 2 | ZFR2 | NM_015174.1 | 4.188 |
26 | neuralized E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 | NEURL1 | XM_011540334.1 | 4.143 |
27 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 pseudogene 4 | MAPK6PS4 | - | 4.132 |
28 | chromosome 12 open reading frame 76 | C12orf76 | XM_005253882.2 | 4.039 |
29 | zinc finger protein 485 | ZNF485 | XM_011539498.1 | 4.034 |
30 | tripartite motif containing 45 | TRIM45 | XM_011542199.1 | 4.034 |
Table 2.
No. | Gene Name | Symbol | RefSeq ID | Fold Change (miR-92a-3p/Control) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | interleukin 1 receptor like 1 | IL1RL1 | NR_104167.1 | 0.076 |
2 | interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 2 | IFIT2 | NM_001547.4 | 0.076 |
3 | thymidine phosphorylase | TYMP | NM_001257989.1 | 0.096 |
4 | MX dynamin like GTPase 2 | MX2 | NM_002463.1 | 0.101 |
5 | keratin 19, type I | KRT19 | NM_002276.4 | 0.104 |
6 | C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 | CXCL10 | NM_001565.3 | 0.117 |
7 | C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11 | CXCL11 | NM_001302123.1 | 0.118 |
8 | radical S-adenosyl methionine domain containing 2 | RSAD2 | NM_080657.4 | 0.122 |
9 | mannosidase alpha class 2A member 1 | MAN2A1 | NM_002372.3 | 0.133 |
10 | interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 | IFIT1 | NM_001548.4 | 0.133 |
11 | cytidine/uridine monophosphate kinase 2 | CMPK2 | NR_046236.1 | 0.147 |
12 | complement factor B | CFB | NM_001710.5 | 0.148 |
13 | interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20kDa | ISG20 | XM_011521521.1 | 0.150 |
14 | indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 | IDO1 | NM_002164.5 | 0.155 |
15 | nidogen 2 | NID2 | XM_005267407.3 | 0.160 |
16 | interferon, gamma-inducible protein 30 | IFI30 | NM_006332.4 | 0.166 |
17 | C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 | CCL5 | NM_001278736.1 | 0.168 |
18 | 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase-like | OASL | NM_001261825.1 | 0.169 |
19 | dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 3 | DKK3 | XM_006718178.2 | 0.170 |
20 | general transcription factor IIE subunit 2 | GTF2E2 | XM_011544510.1 | 0.172 |
21 | beta-2-microglobulin | B2M | NM_004048.2 | 0.174 |
22 | matrix metallopeptidase 10 | MMP10 | NM_002425.2 | 0.174 |
23 | prolyl 3-hydroxylase 3 | P3H3 | NM_014262.4 | 0.179 |
24 | keratin 15, type I | KRT15 | XM_005257345.2 | 0.181 |
25 | interferon induced protein 35 | IFI35 | XM_005257302.3 | 0.191 |
26 | basic leucine zipper ATF-like transcription factor 2 | BATF2 | XM_011544750.1 | 0.194 |
27 | nuclear protein 1, transcriptional regulator | NUPR1 | NM_012385.2 | 0.196 |
28 | interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3 | IFIT3 | NM_001549.5 | 0.197 |
29 | interferon induced transmembrane protein 1 | IFITM1 | NM_003641.3 | 0.198 |
30 | solute carrier family 15 member 3 | SLC15A3 | XM_011545095.1 | 0.199 |
31 | oleoyl-ACP hydrolase | OLAH | XM_006717456.2 | 0.200 |
32 | mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 | MAPKAPK2 | NM_032960.3 | 0.201 |
33 | ISG15 ubiquitin-like modifier | ISG15 | NM_005101.3 | 0.203 |
34 | AXL receptor tyrosine kinase | AXL | NM_001278599.1 | 0.203 |
35 | atypical chemokine receptor 3 | ACKR3 | NM_020311.2 | 0.207 |
36 | complement component 3a receptor 1 | C3AR1 | NM_004054.2 | 0.207 |
37 | MX dynamin like GTPase 1 | MX1 | NM_001144925.2 | 0.208 |
38 | tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 13b | TNFSF13B | XM_005254029.3 | 0.208 |
39 | isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (NADP+) | IDH1 | NM_005896.3 | 0.208 |
40 | PDZ domain containing 2 | PDZD2 | NM_178140.3 | 0.210 |
41 | integrin subunit alpha 5 | ITGA5 | NM_002205.3 | 0.214 |
42 | tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 | TACSTD2 | NM_002353.2 | 0.219 |
43 | HLA complex P5 (non-protein coding) | HCP5 | NR_040662.1 | 0.221 |
44 | olfactory receptor family 9 subfamily I member 1 | OR9I1 | NM_001005211.1 | 0.222 |
45 | fibrillin 1 | FBN1 | NM_000138.4 | 0.222 |
46 | phospholipase A1 member A | PLA1A | NM_001293225.1 | 0.223 |
47 | CD69 molecule | CD69 | NM_001781.2 | 0.224 |
48 | integral membrane protein 2B | ITM2B | NM_021999.4 | 0.226 |
49 | DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member B9 | DNAJB9 | NM_012328.2 | 0.228 |
50 | scavenger receptor class B member 2 | SCARB2 | NM_001204255.1 | 0.230 |
51 | sterile alpha motif domain containing 9 | SAMD9 | NM_017654.3 | 0.230 |
52 | insulin like growth factor binding protein 6 | IGFBP6 | NM_002178.2 | 0.231 |
53 | claudin 11 | CLDN11 | NM_001185056.1 | 0.232 |
54 | unc-93 homolog B1 (C. elegans) | UNC93B1 | XM_011545291.1 | 0.238 |
55 | FRY microtubule binding protein | FRY | XM_006719749.2 | 0.239 |
56 | myosin VIIA and Rab interacting protein | MYRIP | NR_104316.1 | 0.240 |
57 | selectin E | SELE | NM_000450.2 | 0.240 |
58 | interferon regulatory factor 7 | IRF7 | XM_005252909.2 | 0.244 |
59 | HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 5 | HERC5 | NM_016323.3 | 0.244 |
60 | secreted and transmembrane 1 | SECTM1 | XM_011523588.1 | 0.244 |
61 | laminin subunit gamma 2 | LAMC2 | NM_005562.2 | 0.248 |
2.4. CLDN11 is a Novel Target Gene of MiR-92a-3p
CLDN11 belongs to the claudin gene family, which encodes integral components of tight junctions (TJs). In normal epithelia, TJs have various functions, including the regulation of paracellular transport, cell–cell adhesion, cell polarity, proliferation, and differentiation. The disruption of TJs with a loss of TJ-related proteins is a critical process in cancer development and metastasis. As shown in Table 2, CLDN11 is included in the list of DEGs that showed a four-fold downregulation by miR-92a-3p and is also a potential target gene of miR-92a-3p, as predicted by the TargetScanHuman 7.1 (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_71/). We first confirmed that the expression levels of CLDN11 mRNA in the four colon cancer cell lines were significantly downregulated compared with those in normal colon tissue (Figure 4A). The incorporated EVs and the ectopic expression of miR-92a-3p significantly downregulated CLDN11 mRNA and protein in HUVECs (Figure 4B,C). To confirm CLDN11 as a target gene of miR-92a-3p, we cloned the 3’UTR of CLDN11 mRNA, the sequence containing the predicted binding site of miR-92a-3p (region A), into the pMIR-REPORT vector (pMIR-A; Figure 4D). The luciferase activity of wild-type pMIR-A was significantly decreased when the cells were incubated with EVs or co-transfected with miR-92a-3p, whereas mutation of the seed sequence abolished the ability of EVs and miR-92a-3p to inhibit luciferase expression (Figure 4D). These results indicate that miR-92a-3p directly regulates CLDN11 expression in HUVECs. Gene silencing of CLDN11 (Figure 4F) also promoted proliferation (Figure 4E), migration (Figure 4G), and tube formation (Figure 4H) in HUVECs. These results indicate that CLDN11 downregulation by EVs containing miR-92a-3p also contributes to the pro-angiogenic state of endothelial cells.
2.5. MiR-92a-3p Induces Partial Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EndoMT) in HUVECs
The biological process-based functional network of miR-92-3p target genes (CLDN11, Dkk-3, CD69, and ITGA5) was depicted using GeneMANIA (https://genemania.org/; Figure 5A). The network contains TJ-related genes (CLDN11, PATJ, TJP3, and TJP1 (ZO-1)), extracellular matrix/structure organization-related genes (ITGA5, SPP1, ITGB1, ITGB3, COL18A1, and FBN1), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathway-related genes (ITGA5, ITGB3, and VEGFD), and cell–cell junction-related genes (CLDN11, ITGA5, ITGB1, PATJ, TJP3, TJP1 (ZO-1), and CD9). All these genes have the potential to be regulated by miR-92a-3p directly or indirectly. As many TJ-related and cell adhesion-related genes are regulated by miR-92a-3p, we hypothesized that EVs containing miR-92a-3p induce phenomena similar to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in HUVECs. Thus, we further explored EMT-related signaling in HUVECs incubated with EVs or transfected with miR-92a-3p. Transfection of DLD-1 cells with antagomiR-92a-3p significantly decreased the intracellular level of miR-92a-3p and miR-92a-3p secretion via EVs (Figure 5B). Furthermore, incubation with EVs or ectopic expression of miR-92a-3p upregulated snail and vimentin—mesenchymal markers—in HUVECs (Figure 5C,D) and downregulated ZO-1, an epithelial marker; however, the downregulation of ZO-1 was not as drastic (Figure 5C). EVs isolated from DLD-1 cells transfected with antagomiR-92a-3p impaired the EV-mediated upregulation of snail and vimentin (Figure 5C,D). These results suggest that miR-92a-3p is involved in the induction of an EMT-like process called partial EndoMT.
3. Discussion
The present study aimed to determine why colon cancer cells secrete miR-92a-3p via EVs into the surrounding environment. We found that colon cancer cells secrete miR-92a-3p via EVs to exert the following effects in endothelial cells:
accelerating the cell cycle, including mitosis, which leads to endothelial cell proliferation;
loosening intercellular adhesions, which promotes migration;
promoting tube formation through direct regulation of miR-92a-3p target genes, including a newly identified target gene (CLDN11), and indirectly regulating their related genes.
We conclude that, as a whole, these pro-angiogenic processes can contribute to the induction of partial EndoMT in endothelial cells. Consequently, cancer cells receive access to the host’s vessels, which may be utilized as a feeding and/or metastasis route; this supposition should be validated in future research.
We first confirmed that EVs containing miR-92a-3p were efficiently incorporated into endothelial cells, consequently promoting proliferation, migration, and tube formation in endothelial cells. These phenomena were also observed in our previous study, in which Dkk-3 was identified as a target gene of miR-92a-3p [4]. However, the discovery of the regulation of Dkk-3 by miR-92a-3p could not fully explain the complete function of EVs and/or miR-92a-3p in endothelial cells. Thus, cDNA microarray analysis greatly contributed to further revealing the molecular mechanisms underlying these pro-angiogenic events. Heatmap and clustering analysis revealed gene sets that were significantly upregulated or downregulated by miR-92a-3p transfection in endothelial cells. According to the results of the GO analyses, miR-92a-3p significantly upregulated “cell-cycle”, “mitosis”, and “cell division”-related genes, suggesting that the increased cell proliferation of the HUVECs observed in this study can likely be attributed to those upregulated DEGs. GO analysis also demonstrated that miR-92a-3p downregulated “signal transduction”, “immune response”, “cytokine-mediated signaling pathway”, “cell adhesion”, and “proteolysis”-related gene expression. Among them, ITGA5, Dkk-3, and CD69—already reported target genes of miR-92a-3p—were listed as significantly downregulated genes. We also identified a novel target gene of miR-92a-3p—CLDN11.
Claudins, integral membrane proteins in TJs, are expressed in all epithelia and endothelia; they determine the permeability of TJs via modulation of paracellular pathways. So far, 26 claudins that are expressed in a tissue-specific manner have been identified in humans. Among them, CLDN11 was initially identified as oligodendrocyte-specific protein (OSP), as it is highly expressed by oligodendrocytes of the central nervous system (CNS) and localized in the interlamellar TJ strands of myelin sheaths [9,10]. CLDN11/OSP is also strongly expressed at TJs between Sertoli cells of the testicles, forming the blood–testis barrier [11]. Accordingly, CLDN11/OSP knockout mice exhibit both neurological and reproductive disorders, including slow nerve conduction velocity and infertility in male mice due to deficits of the parallel-array TJ strands in the CNS myelin and Sertoli cells [12]. Subsequently, claudin-11/OSP expression in endothelial cells and its barrier function has also been demonstrated [13,14]. Recent studies have shown that the downregulation of CLDN11/OSP contributes to the malignancy of various cancers, as indicated by an increased degree of invasiveness, metastasis promotion, and poor prognoses in colon cancer [15], gastric cancer [16], and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma [17] while the forced expression of CLDN11/OSP in bladder cancer decreases the degree of invasiveness [18]. Those studies demonstrated that the decreased expression level of CLDN11/OSP in cancer is due to the hypermethylation of its promoter region. Our study showed that CLDN11/OSP is also regulated by miR-92a-3p in colon cancer. Altogether, loss of CLDN11/OSP, to which miR-92a-3p contributes, is considered a mechanism for the disruption of cell adhesion and increased cell motility, which are important processes not only in cancer progression and metastasis but also in angiogenesis.
The functional network of miR-92-3p target genes (CLDN11, Dkk-3, CD69, and ITGA5) drawn by GeneMANIA indicates that TJ-related genes, extracellular matrix organization-related genes, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathway-related genes, and cell–cell junction-related genes have the potential to be under miR-92a-3p regulation directly or indirectly. This result also suggests that miR-92a-3p is involved in EndoMT. EndoMT is a variant of traditional epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in which endothelial cells lose their polarity and cell–cell contacts and acquire mesenchymal or myofibroblastic phenotypes, sharing some of the pathways and effectors with EMT. Although EndoMT was considered a rare event in the past, accumulating evidence suggests that endothelial cells undergo EndoMT to supply fibroblasts during many physiological and pathological processes, including embryonic vascular development [19], cardiac fibrosis [20], pulmonary hypertension [21], and cancer development [22,23,24]. The hallmarks of EndoMT are the upregulation of mesenchymal genes (vimentin and α-SMA) and downregulation of epithelial genes (ZO-1 and VE-Cadherin), manifesting in proliferative and migratory phenotypes. During the angiogenic process, endothelial cells at the tip of emerging sprouts are indeed migratory and without cell polarity but stay connected with their neighboring cells. The tip endothelial cells in the sprouts express mesenchymal genes; however, they retain epithelial gene expression. Owing to these characteristics, angiogenic endothelial cells are considered to be in a state of “partial” EndoMT [25,26]. We also confirmed that the HUVECs we used were proliferative and migratory in nature, with upregulated snail and vimentin expression. However, the degree of downregulation of ZO-1—an epithelial marker—was mild in our HUVECs, supporting the conclusion that EVs containing miR-92a-3p induce “partial” EndoMT.
In conclusion, we validated that colon cancer cell-derived EVs are enriched with miR-92a-3p and that EVs likely induced angiogenesis through the upregulation of cell-cycle/mitosis-related genes and downregulation of adhesion-related genes, manifesting in proliferative and migratory phenotypes in endothelial cells. The hallmarks of EMT, vimentin upregulation and mild ZO-1 downregulation, were also observed. Taken together, we conclude that EVs containing miR-92a-3p induce partial EndoMT in endothelial cells. EVs have strong potential to be used as therapeutic targets against cancer progression and metastasis. Further studies are needed to better understand the whole system of cell–cell communication that occurs via EVs so that EVs can be utilized in cancer therapy.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Cell Culture
Human colon cancer DLD-1 (Cat# JCRB9094), WiDr (Cat# JCRB0224), and COLO201 (Cat# JCRB0226) cells were obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB) Cell Bank (Osaka, Japan), while SW480 (SW-480) (ATCC® CCL-228TM) cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). HUVECs were obtained from KURABO (Osaka, Japan). The colon cancer cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) containing 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), while the HUVECs were maintained in complete medium (Humedia-EG2; KURABO). All cell lines were cultured under an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The Trypan blue exclusion test was used to determine the number of viable cells in a cell suspension, from which the cell proliferation ratio was calculated.
4.2. Isolation of Colon Cancer Cell-Derived EVs
For the collection of colon cancer cell-derived EVs, RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with EV-deprived FBS was prepared as follows: FBS was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min; then its supernatant was filtered through a Millex-GP (PES) Filter Unit (0.22 µm pores). The flow-through fraction was ultracentrifuged at 100,000 rpm for 3 h (TLA-110 fixed-angle rotor, Optima TLX, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). Without disturbing the EV pellet, the supernatant was carefully collected and used as EV-deprived FBS, which was then added to the RPMI-1640 medium (EV-deprived RPMI). DLD-1 and WiDr cells (1 × 106 cells) were cultured for 96 h in flasks containing 40 mL of EV-deprived RPMI. The culture medium was then collected and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min. The resulting supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm pore filter for the removal of cell debris, large EVs, and/or apoptotic bodies. The flow-through fraction was ultracentrifuged at 100,000 rpm for 3 h. The EV pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). For the analysis of the miRNA expression profiles of the EVs, RNA lysis buffer (described in Section 4.6) was added to an EV pellet and RNA samples were prepared. To analyze the protein expression profile of EVs, protein lysis buffer (described in Section 4.9) was added to another EV pellet and protein samples were prepared. The EVs resuspended in PBS were added to the culture medium of HUVECs at a concentration of 0.5 × 1011–1 × 1011 particles/0.5 × 105 cells.
4.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
EV samples were also observed by using TEM as follows: EVs resuspended in PBS were mounted on copper grids (200 mesh and coated by formvar carbon film) and stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (PTA) at pH 7 for 2 min. Excess PTA on the grids was removed, and samples were dried. A JEOL 1010 TEM was used to observe EV samples at a voltage of 80 kV.
4.4. Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)
NTA is a method used for the detection of secreted EVs in a liquid sample. Colon cancer cell-derived EVs suspended in PBS (described in Section 4.2) were analyzed using NTA Version 2.3 Build 0034 instrument (NanoSight, Wiltshire, UK). Samples were diluted at 1:1000 in PBS and analyzed.
4.5. Transfection with MiR-92a-3p, Antisense Inhibitor for MiR-92a-3p (AntagomiR-92a-3p), or Short-Interfering RNA for CLDN11
Cells were seeded into six-well plates at a concentration of 0.5 × 105 per well (10–30% confluent) on the day before transfection. Mature-type miR-92a-3p (mirVana miRNA mimic; Ambion, Foster City, CA, USA), antagomiR-92a-3p (mirVana miRNA inhibitor; Ambion), or short-interfering RNA (siRNA) for CLDN11 (siR-CLDN11) were transfected into the cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The sequence of the nonspecific control miRNA (Hokkaido System Science) was 5′-GUAGGAGUAGUGAAAGGCC-3′ [27]. The sequences of siR-CLDN11 were 5′-GACCACCAUCGUGAGCUUUUU-3′ and 5′-AAAGCUCACGAUGGUGGUCUU-3′. The effects manifested by the introduction of miR-92a-3p or siR-CLDN11 into the cells were assessed at 48 h after transfection.
4.6. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total RNA of human normal colon tissue was purchased from Clontech (Mountain View, CA, USA). Total RNA was isolated from cultured cells with RNAiso Plus reagent (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) followed by DNase I treatment. To evaluate mRNA expression, total RNA was reverse-transcribed with ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was then performed using THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix (TOYOBO) and the following primers: CLDN11 (sense, 5′-AATGACTGGGTGGTGACCTG-3′; antisense, 5′-CTGTACTTAGCCACACCGGG-3′) and GAPDH (sense, 5′-CCCAGAAGACTGTGGATGGC-3′; antisense, 5′-TGGGTGTCGCTGTTGAAGTC-3′). To determine the expression levels of miRNAs, we conducted qRT-PCR using TaqMan MicroRNA Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and THUNDERBIRD Probe qPCR Mix (TOYOBO) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The relative expression levels were calculated by the ΔΔCt method. GAPDH was used as an endogenous normalizer for mRNA expression. RNU6B was used as an endogenous normalizer for miR-92a-3p expression. MiR-21 was used as a common normalizer for intracellular and extracellular miR-92a-3p expression because we preliminarily confirmed the abundant presence of miR-21 in both the intracellular and extracellular compartments of the colon cancer cells.
4.7. DNA Microarray Analysis and Data Mining
HUVECs were transfected with nonspecific miRNA or miR-92a-3p (10 nM), and total RNA was extracted at 24 h after transfection. One microgram of total RNA in RNase-free water was submitted to Toray Industries (Tokyo, Japan). DNA microarray analysis of the HUVECs transfected with nonspecific miRNA versus those transfected with miR-92a-3p was performed using 3D-Gene Human oligo chip 25k ver. 2.10 (Toray Industries). The raw signals for each gene were normalized by the global normalization method (median of Cy3/Cy5 ratios = 1). DEGs were analyzed prior to the modular enrichment analysis. Genes with normalized Cy3/Cy5 ratios greater than 2.0 or lower than 0.5 were defined as significantly upregulated or downregulated DEGs by miR-92a-3p, respectively. The heatmaps for the DEGs were generated with GeneSpring 13.0 software (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the clustering function and a Euclidean correlation as a distant metric. For the interpretation of the underlying biological processes, modular enrichment analysis was conducted using GeneCodis (http://genecodis.cnb.csic.es/). The microarray data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) under accession number E-MTAB-8093.
4.8. Antibodies
The primary antibodies used in this study were as follows: anti-CD63 (dilution 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-CD81 (dilution 1:1000, MBL, Nagoya, Japan), anti-TSG101 (dilution 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-flotillin-1 (dilution 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), anti-actinin-4 (dilution 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-β-actin (dilution 1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-CLDN11 (dilution 1:1000, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), anti-vimentin (dilution 1:1000 in western blotting and 1:100 in immunocytochemistry, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ZO-1 (dilution 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-Snail (dilution 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology). The secondary antibodies used in this study were as follows: horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated horse anti-mouse IgG (dilution 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (dilution 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (dilution 1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
4.9. Western Blotting
Harvested cells were lysed with ice-cold protein lysis buffer comprising 20 mM HEPES/NaOH, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1 mM ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), protease inhibitor cocktail (aprotinin, leupeptin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and pepstatin A), and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail set III. Protein concentrations were determined with a BCA Protein Assay Kit (TaKaRa). The protein lysates were subsequently mixed with SDS sample buffer and boiled, followed by separation (10 µg total) by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using a 5–10% polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA, USA), which was subsequently blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in tris-buffered saline and polysorbate 20 (TBST) (137 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris at pH 7.6, and 0.1% Tween 20) and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The membrane was washed three times with TBST and incubated with the appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The immunoblots were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent kit (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Densitometric values for each immunoblot were calculated using Image J.
4.10. Wound Healing Assay
HUVECs were seeded into 12-well plates at a concentration of 0.5 × 105 per well two days before miR-92a-3p or siR-CLDN11 transfection. Wound healing assays were performed as described previously [4].
4.11. Tube Formation Assay
Tube formation assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol of an Angiogenesis Starter Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). HUVECs were seeded into six-well plates at a concentration of 0.5 × 105 per well on the day before transfection. The assay was performed at 24 h after transfection.
4.12. Immunocytochemistry
HUVECs were seeded on eight-well chamber slides (Matsunami Glass Ind., Osaka, Japan) the day before incubation with DLD-1 cell-derived EVs or transfection with miR-92a-3p. The EVs were pre-stained with Vybrant DiO cell-labeling solution (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Briefly, EVs in PBS were incubated with 5 µL of labeling solution for 20 min at room temperature. The labeled suspension was ultracentrifuged at 100,000 rpm for 3 h; then, the supernatant was removed. The labeled EV pellet was once again resuspended in PBS and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 rpm for 3 h as a wash procedure. The washed and labeled EVs were added to the culture media of HUVECs and incubated for 16 h. HUVECs incubated with the labeled EVs were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature, followed by coverslip mounting with VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). HUVECs transfected with miR-92a-3p or nonspecific control miRNA were also fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature, incubated with anti-vimentin antibody and then secondary antibody, followed by coverslip mounting with the mounting medium containing DAPI. The stained cells were observed using Biorevo fluorescence microscopy BZ-X700 (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
4.13. Luciferase Assay
HUVECs were seeded into 96-well plates at a concentration of 0.1 × 104 per well on the day before transfection. On searching TargetScanHuman 7.1 (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_71/) to identify algorithm-based binding sites for miR-92a-3p, we found that the predicted binding site was present at position 2140–2147 in the 3′UTR of CLDN11 mRNA. The sequence region 2052–2372, containing the putative binding sequence for miR-92a-3p, was inserted into a pMIR-REPORT Luciferase miRNA Expression Reporter Vector (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Moreover, we created another pMIR construct encompassing a mutated seed sequence for miR-92a-3p (wild type, GCAAUA; mutant, GUCGUA) using the Prime STAR Mutagenesis Basal Kit (TaKaRa). The mutation of the vector was confirmed by sequence analysis. A pRL-TK Renilla luciferase reporter vector (Promega, Madison, WI) was used as an internal control vector. HUVECs were co-transfected with each reporter vector (0.01 µg) and miR-92a-3p or nonspecific control miRNA (10 nM). Luciferase activity was measured at 24 h after co-transfection using a Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Results were reported as the firefly luciferase/Renilla luciferase ratio.
4.14. Statistical Analysis
Where applicable, values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t tests. A p value lower than 0.05 was considered significant.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Yutaka Hattori (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) for the helpful advice in the use of Biorevo fluorescence microscopy BZ-X700. We also would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.O.Y. and Y.A.; methodology, N.O.Y.; validation, N.O.Y., K.H., Y.A. and T.S.; formal analysis, N.O.Y.; investigation, N.O.Y. and K.H.; data curation, Y.A. and T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.O.Y.; writing—review and editing, N.O.Y. and T.S.; supervision, Y.A. and T.S.; funding acquisition, N.O.Y. and T.S.
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP19K16538 to Yamada NO and JP15K08132 to Senda T.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Lewis B.P., Burge C.B., Bartel D.P. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microrna targets. Cell. 2005;120:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang X., Zeng Z., Hou Y., Yuan T., Gao C., Jia W., Yi X., Liu M. Microrna-92a as a potential biomarker in diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e88745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yamada N., Akao Y. Advances in Biomembranes and Lipid Self-Assembly. Volume 23. Elsevier B.V.; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2016. Extracellular vesicles in cancer; pp. 187–204. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamada N., Nakagawa Y., Tsujimura N., Kumazaki M., Noguchi S., Mori T., Hirata I., Maruo K., Akao Y. Role of intracellular and extracellular microrna-92a in colorectal cancer. Transl. Oncol. 2013;6:482–492. doi: 10.1593/tlo.13280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kowal J., Arras G., Colombo M., Jouve M., Morath J.P., Primdal-Bengtson B., Dingli F., Loew D., Tkach M., Thery C. Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E968–E977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521230113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang G.J., Li L.F., Yang G.D., Xia S.S., Wang R., Leng Z.W., Liu Z.L., Tian H.P., He Y., Meng C.Y., et al. Mir-92a promotes stem cell-like properties by activating wnt/beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:101760–101770. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kumar V., Torben W., Kenway C.S., Schiro F.R., Mohan M. Longitudinal examination of the intestinal lamina propria cellular compartment of simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus macaques provides broader and deeper insights into the link between aberrant microrna expression and persistent immune activation. J. Virol. 2016;90:5003–5019. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00189-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ohyagi-Hara C., Sawada K., Kamiura S., Tomita Y., Isobe A., Hashimoto K., Kinose Y., Mabuchi S., Hisamatsu T., Takahashi T., et al. Mir-92a inhibits peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting integrin alpha5 expression. Am. J. Pathol. 2013;182:1876–1889. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bronstein J.M., Popper P., Micevych P.E., Farber D.B. Isolation and characterization of a novel oligodendrocyte-specific protein. Neurology. 1996;47:772–778. doi: 10.1212/WNL.47.3.772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bronstein J.M., Micevych P.E., Chen K. Oligodendrocyte-specific protein (osp) is a major component of cns myelin. J. Neurosci. Res. 1997;50:713–720. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19971201)50:5<713::AID-JNR8>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Morita K., Sasaki H., Fujimoto K., Furuse M., Tsukita S. Claudin-11/osp-based tight junctions of myelin sheaths in brain and sertoli cells in testis. J. Cell Biol. 1999;145:579–588. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.3.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gow A., Southwood C.M., Li J.S., Pariali M., Riordan G.P., Brodie S.E., Danias J., Bronstein J.M., Kachar B., Lazzarini R.A. Cns myelin and sertoli cell tight junction strands are absent in osp/claudin-11 null mice. Cell. 1999;99:649–659. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81553-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wessells H., Sullivan C.J., Tsubota Y., Engel K.L., Kim B., Olson N.E., Thorner D., Chitaley K. Transcriptional profiling of human cavernosal endothelial cells reveals distinctive cell adhesion phenotype and role for claudin 11 in vascular barrier function. Physiol. Genom. 2009;39:100–108. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90354.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tam L.C., Reina-Torres E., Sherwood J.M., Cassidy P.S., Crosbie D.E., Lutjen-Drecoll E., Flugel-Koch C., Perkumas K., Humphries M.M., Kiang A.S., et al. Enhancement of outflow facility in the murine eye by targeting selected tight-junctions of schlemm’s canal endothelia. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:40717. doi: 10.1038/srep40717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li J., Zhou C., Ni S., Wang S., Ni C., Yang P., Ye M. Methylated claudin-11 associated with metastasis and poor survival of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:96249–96262. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Agarwal R., Mori Y., Cheng Y., Jin Z., Olaru A.V., Hamilton J.P., David S., Selaru F.M., Yang J., Abraham J.M., et al. Silencing of claudin-11 is associated with increased invasiveness of gastric cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shen Z., Cao B., Lin L., Zhou C., Ye D., Qiu S., Li Q., Cui X. The clinical signification of claudin-11 promoter hypermethylation for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017;23:3635–3640. doi: 10.12659/MSM.904751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Awsare N.S., Martin T.A., Haynes M.D., Matthews P.N., Jiang W.G. Claudin-11 decreases the invasiveness of bladder cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2011;25:1503–1509. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Frid M.G., Kale V.A., Stenmark K.R. Mature vascular endothelium can give rise to smooth muscle cells via endothelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation: In vitro analysis. Circ. Res. 2002;90:1189–1196. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000021432.70309.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zeisberg E.M., Tarnavski O., Zeisberg M., Dorfman A.L., McMullen J.R., Gustafsson E., Chandraker A., Yuan X., Pu W.T., Roberts A.B., et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2007;13:952–961. doi: 10.1038/nm1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ranchoux B., Antigny F., Rucker-Martin C., Hautefort A., Pechoux C., Bogaard H.J., Dorfmuller P., Remy S., Lecerf F., Plante S., et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2015;131:1006–1018. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rodriguez M.I., Peralta-Leal A., O’Valle F., Rodriguez-Vargas J.M., Gonzalez-Flores A., Majuelos-Melguizo J., Lopez L., Serrano S., de Herreros A.G., Rodriguez-Manzaneque J.C., et al. Parp-1 regulates metastatic melanoma through modulation of vimentin-induced malignant transformation. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang S.H., Chang J.S., Hsiao J.R., Yen Y.C., Jiang S.S., Liu S.H., Chen Y.L., Shen Y.Y., Chang J.Y., Chen Y.W. Tumour cell-derived wnt5b modulates in vitro lymphangiogenesis via induction of partial endothelial-mesenchymal transition of lymphatic endothelial cells. Oncogene. 2017;36:1503–1515. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fan C.S., Chen W.S., Chen L.L., Chen C.C., Hsu Y.T., Chua K.V., Wang H.D., Huang T.S. Osteopontin-integrin engagement induces hif-1alpha-tcf12-mediated endothelial-mesenchymal transition to exacerbate colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9:4998–5015. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Welch-Reardon K.M., Ehsan S.M., Wang K., Wu N., Newman A.C., Romero-Lopez M., Fong A.H., George S.C., Edwards R.A., Hughes C.C. Angiogenic sprouting is regulated by endothelial cell expression of slug. J. Cell Sci. 2014;127:2017–2028. doi: 10.1242/jcs.143420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mahmoud M.M., Serbanovic-Canic J., Feng S., Souilhol C., Xing R., Hsiao S., Mammoto A., Chen J., Ariaans M., Francis S.E., et al. Shear stress induces endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition via the transcription factor snail. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:3375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03532-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yamada N., Kuranaga Y., Kumazaki M., Shinohara H., Taniguchi K., Akao Y. Colorectal cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles induce phenotypic alteration of t cells into tumor-growth supporting cells with transforming growth factor-beta1-mediated suppression. Oncotarget. 2016;7:27033–27043. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]