Table 7: Moderated mediation results for the left amygdala models across incongruent trials.

Three sets of models were run: one without moderators, one with EC as a moderator and one with NA as a moderator. The results for each model are presented separately within the section for each outcome variable. Significant paths, which are those whose p value exceeds the bias-corrected alpha value as determined by boot-strapping, are shown in bold.

Moderated Mediation Results for Incongruent Trials – Amygdala Models
Outcome variable	Predictor	path	b	SE	Z	p	a
word	amyg	a1	−.39	2.38	−.2	.8429	.006
	amyg × EC	a1 × EC	.56	2.73	.30	.7612	.006
	amyg × NA	a1 × NA	7.20	3.45	3.05	.0023	.006
face	amyg	a2	−2.01	1.06	−1.86	.0631	.006
	amyg × EC	a2 × EC	.76	1.30	.41	.6805	.006
	amyg × NA	a2 × NA	−1.91	1.75	−1.07	.2840	.006
RT	amyg	c	1.22	.47	2.76	.0057	.006
	amyg	c’	1.28	.43	3.39	.0007	.006
	amyg × EC	c × EC	.95	.52	1.67	.0942	.006
	amyg × NA	c × NA	−.34	.74	−.27	.7869	.006
	amyg × EC	c’ × EC	.85	.50	1.59	.1125	.006
	amyg × NA	c’ × NA	−.74	.63	−1.06	.2884	.006
	word	b1	.03	.02	1.69	.0911	.006
	word × EC	b1 × EC	.02	.02	1.25	.2127	.006
	word × NA	b1 × NA	−.04	.02	−1.92	.0552	.006
	face	b2	−.04	.02	−2.11	.0348	.006
	face × EC	b2 × EC	.02	.02	1.09	.2763	.006
	face × NA	b2 × NA	−.05	.03	−1.47	.1427	.006
Indirect Effects
amyg – word – RT		ab1	−.17	.09	−1.83	.0678	.006
amyg – face – RT		ab2	.11	.06	2.50	.0123	.006
amyg – word – RT × EC		ab1 × EC	.05	.07	.91	.3645	.006
amyg – word – RT × NA		ab1 × NA	.11	.14	1.11	.2662	.006
amyg – face – RT × EC		ab2 × EC	−.03	.07	−.31	.7531	.006
amyg – face – RT × NA		ab2 × NA	.02	.07	.26	.7869	.006