Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Biol. 2019 Jul 22;16(5):054001. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/ab2ea0

Phage therapy administered noninvasively could be effective in thin tubes subject to episodic flow despite washout: a simulation study

Celia Blanco 1, Irene A Chen 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC6771420  NIHMSID: NIHMS1051836  PMID: 31266001

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages) have been proposed as candidates for the treatment of bacterial infections in light of emerging antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Bacterial growth within thin tubes is a particular concern, such as in urinary tract infections and colonization of catheters. However, it is not clear whether phage administration to the urinary tract or in catheters could be effective in the context of flow to the outside (i.e. voiding or saline flush). Here, we adapt a previous model of phage infection to a thin tube geometry mimicking the spatial organization of the urinary tract, including bacterial motility and episodic flow during which phages are washed out of the system. We show that density-dependent dynamics permit propagation of the phage infection and that washout has little effect on the timing of bacterial clearance. In addition, instillation of phage at the bottom ~0.1 mm of the tract is effective in our computational model, suggesting that therapeutic phage introduced non-invasively could be efficacious in such situations.

Keywords: urinary tract infection, phage therapy, computational model

1. Introduction

Bacterial infections represent a growing threat to human health as antibiotic resistance genes spread among pathogenic organisms. The main selective pressure driving this trend is the use of antibiotics itself, underscoring the importance of additional therapeutic options. Bacteriophages (phages) represent an orthogonal therapeutic strategy that has garnered increasing attention (reviewed elsewhere (Sulakvelidze et al 2001, Summers 2001, Lu and Koeris 2011, Rose et al 2014, Abedon et al 2017, Lin et al 2017)). Phages possess several potential advantages compared to antibiotics (Sulakvelidze et al 2001, Abedon et al 2011). Depending on the phage strain, phages can have high specificity for the targeted bacteria or a more broad-spectrum effect (Flores et al 2011). Phages also replicate exponentially, potentially reducing the required frequency of dose administration, and can, in principle, be evolved in vitro to overcome resistance. However, phages present multiple challenges to systemic administration, including rapid clearance and poor bioavailability to potential target organs (Ly-Chatain 2014). Therefore, at this point, most current interest in phage therapy focuses on treatment of externally accessible infections, such as burns (Merabishvili et al 2017, Jault et al 2019) or infections of the intestinal tract (Tetz and Tetz 2016, Lusiak-Szelachowska et al 2017). Among these are urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are among the most common hospital and community-acquired bacterial infections. In the USA alone, UTIs affect millions of people and result in hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations and 12 000 deaths each year (Flores-Mireles et al 2015, Waller et al 2018). The incidence of UTIs caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, including vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli, is rising (Kallonen et al 2017) (e.g. >20% of infections are resistant to the first line antibiotic trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (Waller et al 2018)).

While phages could be a promising tool for treating UTIs, current work has been limited to in vitro demonstrations or invasive administration. For example, phage isolates were tested on E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from the urine of patients with UTIs, showing high lytic activity against the strains in vitro (Zhang 2014, Sybesma et al 2016). In three mouse models of UTIs, including infection by uropathogenic E. coli, phage injected intraperitoneally was effective in decreasing bacterial titer and improving survival (Nishikawa et al 2008, Tothova et al 2011 Dufour et al 2016). A planned human trial proposes administration via suprapubic catheter (twice per day for seven days) (Leitner et al 2017). Despite the risks associated with invasive administration, these approaches are taken because of the very low bioavailability of orally administered phage (Bruttin and Brus sow 2005). A safer alternative would be highly desirable. Administration of phages to the lower urinary tract is less invasive, but a clear concern is episodic flow, which would flush phages from the system. However, phages are self-replicating entities, and as such, the dynamics of their populations are not always intuitive. For example, phages exhibit density-dependent behaviors leading to unforgiving time thresholds that determine whether inoculation of a dose is successful or unfruitful (Payne and Jansen 2000, Payne and Jansen 2001). Despite their great potential as antibacterial agents, this lack of understanding has been one issue hampering clinical applications of phage therapy.

Therefore, in this work we model the dynamics of phage applied to a thin tube colonized by bacteria, undergoing episodic flow. The model is relevant to UTIs as well as other environments of potential interest for phage application, such as colonization of catheters, intravenous lines, drains, or other tubing. We adapt a previous model of lytic phage infection by placement in a thin tube and including diffusion of microbes and an episode of flow, during which free phages are washed out of the system. The results from the simulations indicate that even if free phages are completely cleared from the system during the flow, complete elimination of bacteria is still possible if some bacteria were infected after phage inoculation. Thus, we suggest that a single dose of phage administration could be effective in clearing bacterial populations in thin tubes despite counter-acting flow.

2. Model

We adapted a previously proposed kinetic model of lytic bacteriophage infection (Payne and Jansen 2001). In this simple model, u(t) is the amount of uninfected bacterial cells (U), y (t) is the amount of cells infected by bacteriophage (Y), and p (t) the amount of free phage (P). Free phages infect cells with rate constant b. Uninfected and infected bacteria replicate with rate constant a. The lysis rate constant, k, represents the death of the infected host cell by lysis and the release of phages, where Lb is the burst size (i.e. number of particles released per burst). Free phages are inactivated or degraded in the milieu with rate constant m.

We adapt the model to include a spatial coordinate x, simulating a long channel in which the radial dimension is considered to be much smaller than the longitudinal dimension, and growth of bacteria and phage is modeled along one dimension. Uninfected and infected bacteria diffuse with coefficient Dc to model bacterial motility (Berg 1993). Diffusion of free phages is neglected because physical diffusion of phage particles would be much slower than the spread of bacteria via swimming (Berg 1993). Before addition of phage, all cells are assumed to be uninfected and the phage concentration is zero. A bolus of therapeutic phage is introduced at time tΦ, with phage dose pΦ. At time tw, the system experiences washout (e.g. voiding), at which time all phages are eliminated (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic model for phage infection in a thin channel, including bacterial diffusion and phage washout.

The system is described by the following equations (table 1), following the previous model (Payne and Jansen 2001) and Fick’s second law of diffusion. For t > 0, the system contains only uninfected cells, whose time evolution is described as follows:

u(t)t=au(t)bp(t)u(t)+Dc2u(t)x2. (1)

Table 1.

Reactions and parameters of the model.

Cell replication Ua2U
Ya2Y
Phage infection P+UbY
Lysis of host cell YkLbP
Degradation of phage Pm
Bacterial motility Dc
Phage application At time tΦ, phage dose pΦ, is applied
Washout Time tw

Upon addition of phage, for ttϕ, we also have infected cells and phage

y(t)t=ay(t)+bp(t)u(t)ky(t)+Dc2y(t)x2 (2)
p(t)t=kLby(t)bp(t)u(t)mp(t). (3)

2.1. Methods

2.1.1. Numerical solution to the model

The Crank–Nicolson method was used to solve the system numerically. The Crank–Nicolson method is a finite difference method used for numerical simulation of partial differential equations and is commonly applied to diffusion problems (Crank and Nicolson 1996). This method can be regarded as a combination of the forward Euler method and the backward Euler method. We constructed a 2D Crank–Nicolson grid, with N × J steps, where each time step and each space step has a fixed length. We aim to approximate the continuous functions u (x, t),y(x, t) and p(x, t) by their grid functions uj(n), yj(n) and pj(n), where uj(n)u(xj,tn), yj(n)y(xj,tn) and pj(n)p(xj,tn) at the jth spatial coordinate and nth time step.

For a total simulated time T and system of length L: tn = nΔt for n = 0, … ,N − 1, where Δt=TN1, and xj = jΔx for j = 0, … , J − 1,where Δx=LJ1.

The Crank–Nicolson equation is second-order in time:

zj(n+1)zj(n)Δt=Dc2(Δx)2(zj+1(n)2zj(n)+zj1(n)+zj+1(n+1)2zj(n+1)+zj1(n+1)),

where z = u, y, or p.

For every simulation, the total simulated time is T = 60 h (number of steps N = 6000) and the length of the system is L = 2 cm (number of steps J = 200). The length of the system is based on female urethra length values reported in the literature (19–45 mm) (Pomian et al 2018).

2.1.2. Parameters of the model

Simulations of therapeutic responses were computed using biologically meaningful parameters (table 2) for bacterial replication rate constant (a), infection rate constant (b), lysis rate constant (k), and decay rate constant (m), from Payne and Jansen (2001). Burst size, bacterial diffusion, and washout time were considered constant across conditions. Bacterial diffusion terms were set based on values for motile E. coli (Berg 1993). Four sets of conditions were investigated. Conditions (a) and (b) represent rapid turnover systems, with faster bacterial replication, phage infection, lysis, and degradation compared to conditions (c) and (d). Condition (b) differs from (a) in having 10-fold smaller inoculum of phage (pΦ). The slower turnover conditions (c) and (d) receive a much smaller inoculum to probe the lower limit of pΦ that could still reduce the bacterial population. Between the slow turnover conditions (c) and (d), the phage inoculum was applied later in d) to probe the importance of tΦ. For every case, initial conditions were u(0) = 1000 cells, y (0) = 0 cells and p (0) = 0 pfu (plaque-forming units); in other words, the systems began with no phage or infected bacteria. Bacteria were initially evenly distributed along the lowest 0.5% of x (i.e. the lowest 0.1 mm) to simulate an ascending infection.

Table 2.

Parameter values studied here for four conditions (a)–(d). The value of pΦ is given as the number of phages applied to the lowest 0.1 mm of the tube. For parameter b, the term particle refers to either cells (equations (1) and (2)) or pfu (equation (3)).

Parameter (a) (b) (c) (d)
a 0.5 h−1 0.3 h−1
b 10−7 particle−1 h−1 10−6 particle−1 h−1
k 5 h−1 1.2 h−1
Lb 100
m 5 h−1 1.8 h−1
tΦ 2.5 h 10 h
pΦ 109 pfu 108 pfu 100 pfu
Dc 1.44 10−2 cm2 h−1 (when applicable)
tw tΦ + 0.5 h (when applicable)

3. Results

As a basis for comparison, we first simulated the system described by the set of equations above (table 1), using the conditions indicated (table 2) (Payne and Jansen 2001) with no bacterial diffusion or washout (i.e. parameters identical to Payne and Jansen (2001), carried out for longer time). This scenario mimics a well-mixed environment. In condition (a), a large dose of phage eradicated the bacteria almost immediately (down to a population of < 1 cell) and essentially prevented bacterial replication (figure 2(a)). A smaller dose (condition (b)) also eventually cleared the bacteria, but only after a period of substantial bacterial growth (up to ~24 h; figure 2(b)). In the slow turnover systems, the bacteria are brought to low counts at around 24 h even by the low phage doses applied late into the infection (conditions (c) and (d); figure 2(c)). If the dose is applied late (condition (d)), it appears that the greater bacterial density leads to more efficient spread of the phage infection, such that the precise timing of phage inoculation does not substantially affect the time of bacterial clearance. In some cases, although the phage greatly reduces bacterial numbers initially, resulting in very low amounts (<10), the bacteria could potentially regrow from low numbers afterwards (figures 2(a), (c) and (d)); this effect was not previously observed in shorter simulations (Payne and Jansen 2001). Such regrowth might be problematic given the very low numbers of phages during this phase, which might lead to stochastic loss of the phage infection. However, potential regrowth of bacteria from such low numbers may or may not occur in real-life situations in which a functional immune system may efficiently clear very low numbers of bacteria.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Amount of total bacteria, infected bacteria, and phage simulated for 60 h under conditions (a)–(d) (see table 2), with no bacterial diffusion or phage washout. The heat map indicates number of particles (cells or phages). The white color indicates amount < 1 cells or pfu. In a real situation, low populations (e.g. < 1) may represent eradication, such that regrowth afterwards would not be possible. The phage dose is applied at the time indicated by the dashed horizontal line. Note that there is no spatial dimension (i.e. well-mixed; J = 1).

To evaluate the effect of spatial structure, we introduced diffusion of bacterial cells into the system, and used otherwise identical parameters for simulation. To model ascending infection, the bacteria were initially located in the lowest 0.5% of the tract (i.e. the lowest 0.1 mm), distributed evenly. Phages were also inoculated at the appropriate time (tΦ) at the lowest 0.1 mm of the tract. As shown in figure 3, the spatial structure delays eradication, particularly with the large inoculum, but bacteria are eventually reduced to low numbers from the entire tract in every case (at t ~ 36 h for rapid-turnover conditions (a) and (b), and t ~ 48 h for slow-turnover conditions (c) and (d)). These results indicate that the phage infection can ‘outrun’ a motile bacterial population in a 1D channel.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Amount of total bacteria, infected bacteria and free phages simulated for 60 h in a 2 cm tract, using the same conditions as in figure 2 and adding bacterial motility with Dc = 0.0144 cm2 h−1. There is no washout of phages in these scenarios. The phage dose is applied at the time indicated by the dashed horizontal line.

To evaluate the effect of washout of phages, complete washout is introduced 0.5 h after inoculation of the phage for every case. At this time tw, free phages are eliminated from the system. With both inoculum conditions under rapid turnover (conditions (a) and (b); figures 4(a) and (b)), the bacteria are cleared at a time similar to the scenario without washout (t ~ 36 h), because the phage infection became established in the bacterial population before washout. These infected bacteria harbor the phage during washout and then lyse, releasing new free phages into the system that propagate further and eventually eliminate the bacteria in the tract. Qualitatively similar results are obtained in both slow-turnover conditions ((c) and (d); figures 4(c) and (d)), compared to the scenario without washout, in which the phages are able to establish an infection even with a low inoculum (bacterial population dropping to low numbers at ~48 h). Wash-out, even if occurring a relatively short time (0.5 h) after phage inoculation, therefore has a relatively small effect on the ability of the phage to reduce the bacterial population.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Amount of total bacteria, infected bacteria and free phages simulated for 60 h along a 2 cm tract, using the same conditions as figure 3 and including both bacterial motility and washout of phages. The phage dose is applied at the time indicated by the dashed horizontal line; washout occurs 30 min later, at the solid horizontal line.

As expected, similar results are obtained when washout occurs later, corresponding to washout 3.5, 9.5, or 21.5 h after application of the phage dose (tw = 6, 12 or 24 h when tΦ = 2.5 h, or tw = 13.5, 19.5 or 31.5 h when tΦ = 10 h) (figures S1S3) (stacks.iop.org/PhysBio/16/054001/mmedia).

We also examined whether the results were sensitive to the assumption that uninfected and infected cells replicate with the same rate constant (a). Since uninfected cells may replicate more slowly, we carried out simulations with the same parameters as in figure 4, except with uninfected cells replicating with rate constant a/2 (figure S4) or a/10 (figure S5). The results are not substantially affected by these adjustments, possibly because replication of infected cells is relatively limited due to lytic burst.

4. Discussion

In principle, phage therapy to treat UTIs or other bacterial infections in environments subject to episodic flow might seem untenable due to the washout of phages. However, phages are self-replicating entities whose antibacterial activity depends on bacterial concentration, leading to unpredictable effects (Payne and Jansen 2000, 2001). In this computational study, we find that these effects could prevent complete elimination of phages and thus facilitate phage therapy despite washout. While spatial structure, bacterial motility and washout changed the detailed outcome of the simulations compared to the results in the absence of these terms, particularly by delaying bacterial clearance, there was little qualitative change in the efficacy of the phage treatment. Although bacteria move at random away from the applied phage and free phages are washed out at a specific time, the phage treatment persists due to the production of a reservoir of infected cells, which leads to secondary infection as new phages are released by lytic burst. The size of the phage inoculum did not appear to be critical; a bigger inoculum could clear the bacterial population more quickly, but small inocula were effective as well, presumably owing to the exponential amplification dynamics of the phage. Also, in the simulation scenario explored here, both bacteria and phages were introduced at the lowest 0.1 mm of the tract, a position that would be easily accessible for a potential treatment. The ability of the phages to clear the bacterial population when applied in this position indicates that intravesicular instillation of phages to treat UTIs (Sybesma et al 2016) may be unnecessarily invasive. Phage applied noninvasively may be a promising avenue to counter bacterial infections despite concerns about the unique characteristics of the urinary tract and similar geometries.

The need for infected cells to propagate the phage in this context supports the theoretical concern that antibiotics and bacteriophages may not always interact synergistically, as antibiotic-mediated killing of bacteria would reduce the population of infected cells (Payne et al 2000, Payne and Jansen 2003). Antibiotics and phages have been observed to interact synergistically in experimental models (Knezevic et al 2013, Chaudhry et al 2017, Oechslin et al 2017, Chang et al 2019), and further studies of such interactions would be of interest.

It should be noted that application of this model to specific systems would require knowledge (i.e. experimental measurement) of the system parameters. In the conditions explored here, we assumed that cell motility is similar for infected versus non-infected cells and found that bacterial motility was insufficient to ‘outrun’ the phage infection. This situation may or may not hold for specific phages and bacteria; if phage infection inhibits motility, progress of the phage infection through the bacterial population may be impeded, delaying resolution of the bacterial infection. We also assumed that bacterial cells are not washed out (e.g. due to binding to the epithelium) while phages are entirely eliminated during voiding. In terms of persistence of the bacterial infection, this assumption represents a ‘worst-case’ scenario, and thus a relatively stringent test of washout. However, phages may become embedded in the mucosa, avoiding washout (Barr et al 2013, 2015), and voiding appears to play a role in reducing recurrent UTIs, presumably by decreasing bacterial load (Minardi et al 2011). Both effects would be expected to favor resolution of the infection, although simulation studies would be useful for validation. Finally, we did not consider evolution (i.e. emergence of phage-resistant bacteria and subsequent viral evolution (Meyer et al 2010, Kashiwagi and Yomo 2011)), or the role of the human immune system, although we presume that the immune system would be able to clear very low numbers of bacteria. Nevertheless, this computational model might be useful for exploring the potential of phage therapy of bacterial colonization in other tube-like contexts subject to flow, such as catheters, which are also an important nidus of infection. A lack of understanding of the pharmacokinetics of replicating phages is one of the major translational difficulties facing phages as a possible antibiotic therapy (Hesse and Adhya 2019). Thus, such models represent a useful route to explore scenarios for phage therapy and aid prediction of potential outcomes.

Supplementary Material

Supplement

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the NIH Common Fund (DP2GM123457) and the Simons Foundation (290356FY18). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Supplementary material for this article is available online

References

  1. Abedon ST, Garcia P, Mullany P and Aminov R 2017. Editorial: phage therapy: past, present and future Frontiers Microbiol. 8 981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abedon ST, Kuhl SJ, Blasdel BG and Kutter EM 2011. Phage treatment of human infections Bacteriophage 1 66–85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barr JJ et al. 2013. Bacteriophage adhering to mucus provide a non-host-derived immunity Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110 10771–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr JJ et al. 2015. Subdiffusive motion of bacteriophage in mucosal surfaces increases the frequency of bacterial encounters Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112 13675–80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berg HC 1993. Random Walks in Biology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; ) [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruttin A and Brussow H 2005. Human volunteers receiving Escherichia coli phage T4 orally: a safety test of phage therapy Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49 2874–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang RYK, Das T, Manos J, Kutter E, Morales S and Chan HK 2019. Bacteriophage PEV20 and ciprofloxacin combination treatment enhances removal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm isolated from cystic fibrosis and wound patients AAPS J. 21 49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaudhry WN, Concepcion-Acevedo J, Park T, Andleeb S, Bull JJ and Levin BR 2017. Synergy and order effects of antibiotics and phages in killing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms PLoS One 12 e0168615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crank J and Nicolson P 1996. A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type Adv. Comput. Math 6 207–26 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dufour N, Clermont O, La Combe B, Messika J, Dion S, Khanna V, Denamur E, Ricard JD, Debarbieux L and Grp C 2016. Bacteriophage LM33_P1, a fast-acting weapon against the pandemic ST131-O25b:H4 Escherichia coli clonal complex J. Antimicrob. Chemother 71 3072–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Flores CO, Meyer JR, Valverde S, Farr L and Weitz JS 2011. Statistical structure of host-phage interactions Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 E288–97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M and Hultgren SJ 2015. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options Nat. Rev. Microbiol 13 269–84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hesse S and Adhya S 2019. Phage therapy in the twenty-first century: facing the decline of the antibiotic era; is it finally time for the age of the phage? Annu. Rev. Microbiol [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jault P et al. 2019. Efficacy and tolerability of a cocktail of bacteriophages to treat burn wounds infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PhagoBurn): a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 1/2 trial Lancet Infect. Dis 19 35–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kallonen T, Brodrick HJ, Harris SR, Corander J, Brown NM, Martin V, Peacock SJ and Parkhill J 2017. Systematic longitudinal survey of invasive Escherichia coli in England demonstrates a stable population structure only transiently disturbed by the emergence of ST131 Genome Res. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kashiwagi A and Yomo T 2011. Ongoing phenotypic and genomic changes in experimental coevolution of RNA bacteriophage Qbeta and Escherichia coli PLoS Genet. 7 e1002188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Knezevic P, Curcin S, Aleksic V, Petrusic M and Vlaski L 2013. Phage-antibiotic synergism: a possible approach to combatting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Res. Microbiol 164 55–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leitner L et al. 2017. Bacteriophages for treating urinary tract infections in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, doubleblind clinical trial BMC Urol. 17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin DM, Koskella B and Lin HC 2017. Phage therapy: an alternative to antibiotics in the age of multi-drug resistance World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther 8 162–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu TK and Koeris MS 2011. The next generation of bacteriophage therapy Curr. Opin. Microbiol 14 524–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lusiak-Szelachowska M, Weber-Dabrowska B, Jonczyk-Matysiak E, Wojciechowska R and Gorski A 2017. Bacteriophages in the gastrointestinal tract and their implications Gut Pathog. 9 44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ly-Chatain MH 2014. The factors affecting effectiveness of treatment in phages therapy Frontiers Microbiol. 5 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Merabishvili M, Monserez R, van Belleghem J, Rose T, Jennes S, De Vos D, Verbeken G, Vaneechoutte M and Pirnay JP 2017. Stability of bacteriophages in burn wound care products PLoS One 12 e0182121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meyer JR, Agrawal AA, Quick RT, Dobias DT, Schneider D and Lenski RE 2010. Parallel changes in host resistance to viral infection during 45 000 generations of relaxed selection Evolution 64 3024–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Minardi D, d’Anzeo G, Cantoro D, Conti A and Muzzonigro G 2011. Urinary tract infections in women: etiology and treatment options Int. J. Gen. Med 4 333–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nishikawa H et al. 2008. T-even-related bacteriophages as candidates for treatment of Escherichia coli urinary tract infections Arch. Virol 153 507–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oechslin F, Piccardi P, Mancini S, Gabard J, Moreillon P, Entenza JM, Resch G and Que YA 2017. Synergistic interaction between phage therapy and antibiotics clears Pseudomonas Aeruginosa infection in endocarditis and reduces virulence J. Infect. Dis 215 703–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Payne RJ and Jansen VA 2001. Understanding bacteriophage therapy as a density-dependent kinetic process J. Theor. Biol 208 37–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Payne RJ and Jansen VA 2003. Pharmacokinetic principles of bacteriophage therapy Clin. Pharmacokinetics 42 315–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Payne RJH and Jansen VAA 2000. Phage therapy: the peculiar kinetics of self-replicating pharmaceuticals Clin. Pharmacol. Ther 68 225–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pomian A, Majkusiak W, Kociszewski J, Tomasik P, Horosz E, Zwierzchowska A, Lisik W and Barcz E 2018. Demographic features of female urethra length Neurourol. Urodyn.37 1751–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rose T, Verbeken G, Vos DD, Merabishvili M, Vaneechoutte M, Lavigne R, Jennes S, Zizi M and Pirnay JP 2014. Experimental phage therapy of burn wound infection: difficult first steps Int. J. Burns Trauma 4 66–73 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sulakvelidze A, Alavidze Z and Morris JG Jr 2001. Bacteriophage therapy Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45 649–59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Summers WC 2001. Bacteriophage therapy Annu. Rev. Microbiol 55 437–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sybesma W, Zbinden R, Chanishvili N, Kutateladze M, Chkhotua A, Ujmajuridze A, Mehnert U and Kessler TM 2016. Bacteriophages as potential treatment for urinary tract infections Frontiers Microbiol. 7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tetz G and Tetz V 2016. Bacteriophage infections of microbiota can lead to leaky gut in an experimental rodent model Gut Pathog. 8 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tothova L, Celec P, Babickova J, Gajdosova J, Kamodyova N, Drahovska H, Liptakova A, Turna J and Hodosy J 2011. Phage therapy of cronobacter-induced urinary tract infection in mice FEBS J 278 338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Waller TA, Pantin SAL, Yenior AL and Pujalte GGA 2018. Urinary tract infection antibiotic resistance in the United States Prim. Care 45 455–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang QG 2014. Exposure to phages has little impact on the evolution of bacterial antibiotic resistance on drug concentration gradients Evol. Appl 7 394–402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement

RESOURCES