Abstract
A regio‐ and chemoselective preparation of bicyclic alkoxyoxazolium salts from amide derivatives of proline and pipecolic acid by electrophilic amide activation is reported. Mechanistic NMR experiments suggest an unusual role for the base and highlight the effect of substitution pattern of the substrates.
Keywords: Amide activation, Oxazolium, Chemoselectivity, Cycloaddition, Synthesis design
Introduction
The high abundance of carboxamides1 in combination with their distinct, mild nucleophilic properties2 makes them an interesting target for the investigation of organic reactions. Already in the 19th century it was observed that primary amides react readily with dehydrating agents such as PCl5 or concentrated sulfuric acid to give nitriles.3 This resulted in an early recognition that the poor electrophilicity of the carbonyl‐carbon of carboxamides can be readily enhanced by electrophilic activation.2 Robinson[4a] and Gabriel[4b] discovered independently that acylated α‐amino ketones form oxazoles upon treatment with similar dehydrating agents (Scheme 1a).5, 6 The resulting oxazole products can be alkylated, although this requires highly reactive alkylating agents (Scheme 1b).7 Recently, the electrophilic activation of tertiary amides has been used for the synthesis of certain N‐aryloxazolium salts (Scheme 1c).8 However, that report restricted itself to the formation of oxazolium salts derived from aromatic amides.
Scheme 1.

(a–c) Prior art for the synthesis of oxazolium salts and (d) this work.
Herein we would like to report the synthesis of bicyclic oxazolium salts based on proline‐ and pipecolic acid‐derived amides (Scheme 1d). The products display interesting reactivity and can be converted to complex structures by formal cycloaddition.[7a], 9
Results and Discussion
As part of our interest in electrophilic amide activation,2, 10 we recently investigated the suitability of proline as a chiral auxiliary for certain α‐functionalization reactions. However, when 1a (Scheme 2) was subjected to electrophilic activation using trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride (triflic anhydride) and 2‐iodopyridine, quantitative and fast formation of the oxazolium salt 2a was observed.11 Surprisingly, slight modification of the aliphatic backbone of the amide lead to a dramatic change in reactivity: when the linear propionamide 1b (Scheme 2) was employed instead of 2‐methylpropionamide 1a, mostly recovered starting material was observed. Conversion of 1b did not improve with other bases or with elevated temperature.
Scheme 2.

Preliminary results: oxazolium synthesis from 2‐methylpropionamide 1a and failed reaction for propionamide 1b.
It is noteworthy that not only do the reaction mixtures of 1a and 1b differ considerably in appearance,12 but in situ 1H‐NMR spectra of those two mixtures in deuterated DCM are also strikingly different (Figure 1). As shown, while the reaction mixture of 1a shows almost exclusively the product and the base after 5 minutes of reaction time, the spectrum of 1b under the same reaction conditions is much more complicated.
Figure 1.

Upper NMR trace: reaction of 1b with 2‐I Py (2.2 eq.) and Tf2O (1.1 eq.) in d2‐DCM after 5 minutes reaction time. The multiplet at 4.9 ppm is assigned to 2‐I‐pyridine adduct 4b. Lower NMR trace: reaction of 1a with 2‐I Py (2.2 eq.) and Tf2O (1.1 eq.) in d2‐DCM after 5 minutes reaction time. The spectrum shows a very clean formation of the desired product.
The successful reaction of 1a most likely proceeds via interception of the activated amide 3a (Figure 1) by the pendant ester moiety, with a subsequent (formal) elimination of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (triflic acid).
In the case of 1b, although trace amounts of the product can be detected, other species dominate the spectrum. The species characterized by a signal at ca. 5.0 ppm, labelled as 4b (Figure 1), appears to be the main compound. The structure of 4b has been assigned as a 2‐iodopyridine adduct by 2D‐NMR analysis (see Supporting Information for details) and is a common intermediate in the electrophilic amide activation regime.[10d]
Interestingly, not even traces of an analogous species derived from 1a can be detected by 1H NMR under the same reaction conditions. These findings suggest that, in the case of 1a, limited accessibility of the α‐proton (by virtue of the α‐substituent) slows deprotonation and formation of enamine‐type adducts; this in turn is likely to greatly favor oxazolium formation in these systems.
These observations would suggest that omitting the base might allow oxazolium formation even in “unbranched” substrates such as 1b. In the event, such a simple modification (Scheme 3) indeed led to the expected oxazolium 2b in 82 % yield.13 The 1H NMR spectrum of 1b in d2‐DCM after 5 minutes reaction time (Figure 2) now shows clean product formation, with a species assigned as intermediate 3b as the major compound in the mixture. The conspicuous absence of vinylic C‐H resonances, indicative of a slower deprotonation, should be noted.
Scheme 3.

See Supporting Information for detailed reaction conditions. Yield refers to the pure isolated product.[a] 2.5 equiv. of Tf2O used.
Figure 2.

Upper NMR trace: reaction of 1b with Tf2O (1.1 eq.) in d2‐DCM after 5 minutes reaction time. The multiplet at 4.8 ppm is assigned to the cation 3b (the only other species present in considerable amounts is the desired oxazolium product). Lower NMR trace: reaction of 1a with Tf2O (1.1 eq.) in d2‐DCM after 5 minutes reaction time.
Several other bicyclic, alkoxyoxazolium salts could be synthesized through this procedure in good to excellent yields (Scheme 3). Halogens such as chloride (2d) or bromide (2i) were tolerated. Pleasingly, an additional ester on the aliphatic chain does not interfere in the process.[2e] It is also noteworthy that a phenyl ring in proximity to the activated amide (2c) does not trigger Friedel‐Crafts reactivity. The reaction was also found to be amenable to pipecolic acid derivatives (2f–2j).
We noted that the products structurally resemble münchnones14 to some extent. The latter are well‐known for their ready participation in interesting (3+2) cycloadditions.14 In the event, we achieved a reductive formal [2+2]‐cycloaddition of oxazolium salt 2b with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMDA) leading to product 6b in good yield and as a single diastereoisomer (Scheme 4).9 The NOESY NMR spectrum of compound 6 is consistent with the stereochemistry shown in Scheme 4.
Scheme 4.

Possible further transformation of one oxazolium salt.
Conclusion
Herein we reported that bicyclic, alkoxyoxazolium salts can be readily prepared from simple proline‐ and pipecolic acid derivatives. Mechanistic experiments highlighted a deleterious role for the base. The products lend themselves to synthetic elaboration by cycloaddition reactions.
Supporting information
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
Support of this research by the Erasmus + Program (fellowship to E.S.) and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, Grant P30226) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank the University of Vienna for continued support of our research programs.
References
- 1. Greenberg A., Breneman C. M., Liebman J. F. and Chemistry The Amide Linkage: Structural Significance in, in: Biochemistry and Materials Science, Wiley, New York, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 2.For reviews on amide activation see: a) Kaiser D., Bauer A., Lemmerer M. and Maulide N., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 7899–7925; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Kaiser D. and Maulide N., J. Org. Chem., 2016, 81, 4421–4428; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Pace V., Holzer W. and Olofsson B., Adv. Synth. Catal., 2014, 356, 3697–3736; [Google Scholar]; d) Huang P.‐Q., Acta Chim. Sinica, 2018, 76, 357–365; [Google Scholar]; e) Sato T., Yoritate M., Tajima H. and Chida N., Org. Biomol. Chem., 2018, 16, 3864–3875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wallach O., Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1877, 184, 1–127. [Google Scholar]
- 4.a) Robinson R., J. Chem. Soc. Trans., 1909, 95, 2167–2174; [Google Scholar]; b) Gabriel S., Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1910, 43, 134–138; [Google Scholar]; c) Wasserman H. H. and Vinick F. J., J. Org. Chem., 1973, 38, 3407–2408; [Google Scholar]; For a variation of the Robinson‐Gabriel synthesis with Tf, 2O: d) Thalhammer A., Mecinović J., Schofield C. J., Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1045–1047. [Google Scholar]
- 5.The Robinson‐Gabriel reaction in total synthesis: a) Bagley M. C., Bashford K. E., Hesketh C. L. and Moody C. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 3301–3313; [Google Scholar]; b) Nicolaou K. C., Hao J., Reddy M. V., Rao P. B., Rassias G., Snyder S. A., Huang X., Chen D. Y.‐K., Brenzovich W. E., Giuseppone N., O'Brate A. and Giannakakou P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 12897–12906; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Nicolaou K. C., Snyder S. A., Huang X., Simonsen K. B., Koumbis A. E. and Bigot A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 10162–10173; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Wipf P. and Venkatraman S., J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 6517–6522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Turchi For a summary of variations of the Robinson‐Gabriel reaction see: I., in: , The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, Oxazoles., Wiley, New York, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 7.a) Vedejs E. and Grissom J. W., J. Org. Chem., 1988, 539, 1876–1882; [Google Scholar]; b) Swaleh S. and Liebscher J., J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 3184–3193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Zhang J., Fu J., Su X., Qin X., Zhao M. and Shi M., Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 9625–9627; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang J., Fu J., Su X., Wang X., Song S. and Shi M., Chem. Asian J., 2013, 558–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Vedejs E. and Wisniewski Grissom J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 6433–6434. [Google Scholar]
- 10.a) Adler P., Teskey C. J., Kaiser D., Holy M., Sitte H. H. and Maulide N., Nat. Chem., 2019, 11, 329–334; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Stopka T., Adler P., Hagn G., Zhang H., Tona V. and Maulide N., Synthesis, 2019, 51, 194–202; [Google Scholar]; c) Teskey C. J., Adler P., Gonçalves C. R. and Maulide N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 447–451; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem., 2019, 131, 456; [Google Scholar]; d) Peng B., Geerdink D., Farès C. and Maulide N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5462–5466; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem., 2014, 126, 5566. [Google Scholar]
- 11.For selected methods for the synthesis of polysubstituted amidines, benzimidazoles and pyrimidines see: Wang J., He Z., Chen X., Song W., Lu P. and Wang Y., Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar]
- 12.The reaction mixture of 1b is a deep red clear solution, while the reaction mixture of 1a is slightly yellowish.
- 13.The formal elimination of triflic acid was accomplished by quenching the reaction with water saturated‐DCM. Similar results were achieved when the base was added after stirring the mixture of substrate and triflic anhydride for 14 h.
- 14.a) Huisgen R., Gotthardt H. and Bayer H. O., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1964, 3, 135–136; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem., 1964, 76, 185; [Google Scholar]; b) Huisgen R., Gotthardt H., Bayer H. O. and Schaefer F. C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1964, 3, 136–137; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem., 1964, 76, 185; [Google Scholar]; c) Kakaawla T. K. K., Hartley W. C. and Harrity J. P. A., Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2016, 2789–2792; [Google Scholar]; d) Reißig H.‐U. and Zimmer R., Angew. Chem., 2014, 126, 9864–9866. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information
