Abstract
Transient receptor potential (TRP) proteins form Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channels, but their role in neuronal Ca2+ homeostasis is elusive. In the present paper, we show that TRPC channels potently regulate synaptic plasticity by changing the presynaptic Ca2+-homeostasis of hippocampal neurons. Specifically, loss of TRPC1/C4/C5 channels decreases basal-evoked secretion, reduces the pool size of readily releasable vesicles, and accelerates synaptic depression during high-frequency stimulation (HFS). In contrast, primary TRPC5 channel-expressing neurons, identified by a novel TRPC5–τ-green fluorescent protein (τGFP) knockin mouse line, show strong short-term enhancement (STE) of synaptic signaling during HFS, indicating a key role of TRPC5 in short-term plasticity. Lentiviral expression of either TRPC1 or TRPC5 turns classic synaptic depression of wild-type neurons into STE, demonstrating that TRPCs are instrumental in regulating synaptic plasticity. Presynaptic Ca2+ imaging shows that TRPC activity strongly boosts synaptic Ca2+ dynamics, showing that TRPC channels provide an additional presynaptic Ca2+ entry pathway, which efficiently regulates synaptic strength and plasticity.
Transient receptor potential (TRP) proteins can form non-selective cation channels, but their role in synaptic transmission is poorly understood. This study shows that calcium-permeable TRPC channels provide an additional calcium entry pathway at presynaptic sites and are efficient regulators of synaptic strength and plasticity.
Introduction
Short-term presynaptic plasticity is a widespread and important means of synaptic regulation, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood [1,2]. Calcium plays an important role in many use-dependent forms of plasticity, and STE of synaptic signaling can be changed by calcium channel facilitation, saturation of endogenous calcium buffers, or other means downstream of the voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC)-mediated Ca2+ entry [2]. The canonical transient receptor potential channel (TRPC) family comprises 7 members (TRPC1 to TRPC7) that are able to form Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channels [3]. TRPC channels can be activated in response to stimulation of phospholipase C-coupled receptors [4], subsequent to store depletion [5–7], or directly by intracellular Ca2+ [8–10]. They have been implicated in diverse neuronal functions, such as excitability [11–13], excitotoxicity [14], neurogenesis [15], and neurite outgrowth [16–18]. Based on phylogenetic analyses and sequence similarities, the TRPC subfamily can be divided into 3 subgroups: TRPC1/TRPC4/TRPC5, TRPC3/TRPC6/TRPC7, and TRPC2 [15,19]. Group-specific interactions between TRPC1, TRPC4, and TRPC5, but not with members of the TRPC3/TRPC6/TRPC7 subgroup, were observed in heterologous expression systems [20]. Furthermore, Trpc1, Trpc4, and Trpc5 genes were found to be co-expressed in subregions of the hippocampus, as documented by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization [21–25]. TRPC4 and TRPC5 are strongly potentiated [9,26] or even directly activated by elevations of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca]i) [8]. The latter study demonstrated that Ca2+ entry through other channels, including VGCCs, directly enhanced TRPC5 activity. In contrast, TRPC1 channels do not respond to intracellular Ca2+ elevations but are inserted into the plasma membrane in response to local Ca2+ entry through Orai1 channels [27].
Although TRPC1, TRPC4, and TRPC5 have been implicated in the generation of Ca2+ signals in different secretory cells [16,18,21,25,28,29], their potential contribution to Ca2+-dependent transmitter release and neuronal communication has remained largely controversial [13,30–36]. In a recent study, we showed that genetic loss of TRPC1, TRPC4, and TRPC5 channels (TRPC triple knockout [tko]) impairs working memory and flexible relearning, most likely by reducing synaptic transmission of hippocampal neurons [37]. Yet, the underlying molecular mechanisms of how these TRPC channels are able to regulate synaptic signaling have remained unclear.
Here, we delineate so far unprecedented TRPC actions in the regulation of synaptic vesicle release. Using electrophysiological recordings of hippocampal neurons from TRPC-deficient mice and from a novel Cre knock-in mouse line, which genetically labels primary TRPC5-expressing neurons, along with presynaptic Ca2+ measurements and lentiviral TRPC expression experiments, we provide first evidence that TRPC5 channel activity efficiently regulates presynaptic Ca2+-dynamics and controls synaptic vesicle recruitment. Collectively, our data show that TRPC5 channels play a pivotal role in the regulation of short-term synaptic plasticity in neurons.
Results
Loss of TRPC1/C4/C5 reduces the replenishment rate and the readily releasable pool size of vesicles
To elucidate the mechanisms how genetic loss of TRPC1/C4/C5-channels affects the action potential (AP)-evoked postsynaptic current (EPSC), we used high-frequency train stimulations (20 Hz for 2 s) in autaptic hippocampal wild-type (wt) and TRPC1/C4/C5 tko neurons. Synaptic responses were analyzed with respect to the readily releasable pool (RRP) size, release probability (Pr), paired-pulse ratio (PPR), replenishment rate, and synaptic depression. Loss of TRPC channels significantly reduced the amplitude of the first EPSC during the train (Fig 1A, 1B and 1D) and clearly accelerated the time course of synaptic depression when compared with controls (Fig 1C). Although wt cells showed a clear heterogeneity in synaptic signaling ranging from short-term enhancement (STE, AmpEPSC10/AmpEPSC1 ratio >1) to short-term depression (STD; AmpEPSC10/AmpEPSC1 ratio <1) during HFS, tko neurons predominantly displayed STD (Fig 1E–1G). Furthermore, the synchronous and asynchronous phase of the total synaptic charge transfer were similarly diminished (Fig 1H–1K), indicating that factors upstream of the RRP are affected by genetic loss of the TRPCs. To determine the RRP size, the data plot of the cumulative synchronous EPSC charge was approximated with a linear regression fitting the last 5 stimuli [38] (Fig 1L). Back-extrapolating the linear component of the steady-state phase renders an estimate of the initial RRP size (Fig 1L). Indeed, loss of TRPC channels strongly reduced the RRP size (Fig 1M) but left the Pr (i.e., first EPSC charge divided by the RRP charge) unchanged (Fig 1N). To determine the replenishment rate of vesicles during pool depletion, the slope of the plot of the cumulative total charge was approximated by linear regression fitting over the last 5 stimuli (Fig 1O). The replenishment rate was strongly reduced in tko neurons compared with controls (Fig 1P). Taken together, these results suggest that TRPC channels influence vesicle recruitment and thereby regulate the RRP size and the time course of synaptic depression during HFS.
To study the subcellular distribution of TRPC channels, we co-immunolabeled neuronal cultures with antibodies directed against TRPC5 and the presynaptic marker protein bassoon. Confocal imaging revealed clear TRPC5 staining in somatic regions and axonal branches (S1 Fig, upper panels) as well as in varicosity-like thickenings of fine axonal branches, where it colocalized with bassoon (S1 Fig, lower panels). The specificity of the TRPC labeling was verified in cultures of TRPC1/C4/C5-tko neurons, which did not exhibit a discernable TRPC5 immunosignal (S1B Fig). TRPC5 was detected in about half of the presynaptic terminals (positive for bassoon, S1E Fig), indicating a heterogeneous TRPC5 expression in hippocampal neurons. In any case, these results are in line with our functional analyses showing that TRPC activity alters synaptic efficacy.
Primary TRPC5-expressing neurons show strong STE of synaptic signaling
To identify primary TRPC5-expressing neurons by genetic labeling, we generated a new TRPC5-Cre knockin (KI) mouse strain (TRPC5-internal ribosomal entry site cre recombinase [IC], S1A and S1B Fig). Here, the trpc5 gene is followed by an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and by a Cre recombinase cDNA. When crossbred with ROSA26-floxed-stop-τGFP (eR26-τGFP) reporter mice [39], the Cre recombinase excises a floxed termination sequence 5ʹ to the τGFP transgene within the ROSA26 locus resulting in constitutive reporter expression in TRPC5-expressing cells.
About 8% of the hippocampal neurons prepared from TRPC5-IC/eR26-τGFP mice were found to be τGFP-positive (7.7% ± 1.5% of 831 total cells, 2 preparations) and showed a clear immunosignal for TRPC5 (S2C and S2D Fig). Yet, among neurons, which were negative for τGFP, we also observed TRPC5-expressing cells (38.5% ± 3.58% of the τGFP-negative neurons; S2D Fig), most likely because the coding sequence 3ʹ of the IRES sequence is known to be expressed at significantly lower levels than the coding sequence 5ʹ of the IRES [40]. A similar frequency of TRPC5 positive cells was found with immunolabeling cultures of wt neurons (52% ± 3%, 195 out of 375 cells, 3 preparations), showing that IRES insertion does not affect the expression of the upstream protein (S2E and S2F Fig). Thus, hippocampal neurons heterogeneously express TRPC5 and τGFP labeling (in cultures of KI mutant mice) enables the identification of neurons that reliably express TRPC5. We comparatively analyzed synaptic signaling from τGFP-positive and τGFP-negative neurons with that of tko neurons. Indeed, τGFP-positive (i.e., TRPC5-expressing) neurons showed strong STE of their synaptic response during HFS and an increased PPR (Fig 2A–2E). In contrast, tko neurons started off with lower first EPSC amplitude and showed classical STD during HFS. The AmpEPSC10/AmpEPSC1 ratio is altered for the entire population of τGFP-positive neurons (Fig 2F and 2G), reaching on average a nearly 3-fold higher ratio than in tko neurons (τGFP-positive neurons: 1.63 ± 0.11; tko neurons 0.6 ± 0.05, p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA on ranks, Fig 2H). Furthermore, the synchronous and asynchronous charge component of the evoked response and the replenishment rate recorded in τGFP-positive cells were strongly enhanced when compared with synaptic responses of tko neurons (Fig 2I–2O). τGFP-negative neurons, instead, displayed an intermediate plasticity phenotype with respect to AmpEPSC10/AmpEPSC1 ratio (0.94 ± 0.09), total synaptic charge transfer, synchronous charge, and asynchronous charge as well as PPR and replenishment rate (Fig 2). These results agree with the observation that about 39% of the τGFP-negative neurons express TRPC5 (S2 Fig). Overall, the systematic changes in STP between τGFP-positive and -negative neurons as well as tko neurons correlate well with the differential expression of TRPC5 in these groups, indicating that endogenous TRPC5 activity is a key factor in regulating synaptic plasticity.
TRPC activity promotes presynaptic short-term plasticity in hippocampal neurons
To further study the impact of TRPC activity on synaptic signaling, we expressed TRPC1 or TRPC5 in wt neurons using lentiviral transduction. Wt neurons expressing either TRPC1 or TRPC5 developed a robust STE of the synaptic response during the stimulation train (Fig 3A–3C). TRPC channel expression shifts the frequency distribution for AmpEPSC10/AmpEPSC1 ratios to higher values, confirming general changes in STP (Fig 3D–3F). Starting from an unchanged first AP-evoked response (wt: 5.61 ± 0.56 nA; wt + C1: 5.8 ± 0.65 nA; wt + C5: 6.04 ± 0.69 nA; Fig 3B), TRPC expression significantly increased the PPR and elevated the synchronous as well as asynchronous charge transfer when compared with controls (Fig 3G–3N). Overall, a 1.5- to 2-fold higher total synaptic charge transfer (wt: 65.2 ± 5.8 pC; wt + C1: 98.27 ± 7.20 pC; wt + C5: 116.01 ± 8.79 pC) and a corresponding increase in the vesicle supply rate was observed (Fig 3H–3J). Importantly, the synaptic plasticity phenotype observed with lentiviral TRPC5 expression largely mimics that of the τGFP-positive neurons (compare with Fig 2), demonstrating that TRPC5 channels are instrumental in controlling synaptic plasticity.
The short-term plasticity (STP) phenotype of TRPC-expressing cells often hindered the RRP determination because a steady-state response in the late phase of stimulus train was not reached [41]. Therefore, we made use of hypertonic sucrose stimulation to provide an estimate of the RRP size and the Pr with single AP stimulation [42]. Consistent with our results obtained with HFS, loss of TRPC1/C4/C5 reduced the AP-evoked response and the RRP size but left the Pr unchanged (S3 Fig). Furthermore, neither the expression of TRPC5 nor of TRPC1 in wt neurons significantly altered the RRP and the Pr (S3C Fig). Thus, TRPC activity does not affect the basal release probability but rather enhances the vesicle recruitment in an activity-dependent manner during HFS.
Given that TRPC channels have been implicated in growth cone guidance and morphology [16,17], one might speculate that TRPC-mediated changes of synaptic signaling may at least in part be due to alterations in the number of synapses. To pursue this issue, we immunolabeled autaptic wt, tko, and wt neurons expressing either TRPC variant with the presynaptic marker protein bassoon (S4 Fig). Yet, synaptogenesis was neither affected by loss of TRPC channels nor by their lentiviral expression. To study whether TRPC channels interfere with the overall synaptic structure, cultured hippocampal neurons were co-immunolabeled for the active zone protein bassoon and the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95. Because bassoon and PSD-95 reside on either side of the synaptic cleft, we determined the degree of juxtaposition (or colocalization) of both signals up to a distance of 770 nm from the bassoon signal (S4C Fig). Quantitation of the percentage of “bassoon area” covered by PSD-95 signal revealed that neither the absence of TRPC1/4/5 nor the expression of TRPC1 or C5 in wt neurons altered the overall colocalization of bassoon and PSD95 puncta (S4D and S4E Fig). Taken together, these results render the possibility unlikely that changes in synapse number or organization contribute to the observed TRPC-mediated alterations in synaptic signaling.
TRPC channel activity promotes efficient recovery from synaptic depression
To further explore the role of synaptic TRPC channels in vesicle replenishment, we analyzed the recovery kinetics of phasic release from depression after HFS (S5 Fig). The degree of recovery was determined by dividing the EPSC amplitude of the test pulse (given at various time intervals after HFS) by that of the first response during the stimulus train (20 Hz; S5A and S5B Fig). A single exponential function was used to approximate the time course of recovery (see S5 Fig legend for details). The results show that expression of TRPC1 or TRPC5 in wt neurons diminished synaptic depression during the train (S5C Fig), accelerated the recovery kinetics (S5D Fig), and strongly augmented the EPSC amplitude when compared with controls (S5E Fig). In contrast, loss of TRPC activity (tko neurons) slowed down the recovery kinetics from synaptic depression when compared with controls (S5F–S5H Fig). Collectively, these results indicate that activation of synaptic TRPC channels leads to more efficient and faster mobilization of vesicles from the reserve pool.
Buffering presynaptic [Ca]i abolishes TRPC-dependent STE
Using photolytic uncaging experiments, we have previously shown that TRPC5 channels can directly be activated by an intracellular Ca2+ increase at the millisecond time scale [8]. Thus, it is possible that rapid activation of TRPC-mediated Ca2+ permeabilities further elevate the presynaptic Ca2+ rise during the stimulus train. To minimize the accumulation of intraterminal calcium during HFS, neuronal cultures were preincubated with the membrane-permeable calcium chelator ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid acetoxymethyl ester (EGTA-AM; 300 μM for 5 min; Fig 4). Owing to its slow kinetics and high affinity, EGTA buffers global Ca2+ without affecting phasic transmitter release [1]. EGTA did not change the first EPSC amplitude but significantly reduced the PPR of responses for wt neurons and those expressing additional TRPC1 or TRPC5 (Fig 4A, 4B, and 4C). In the same line, EGTA nearly abolished the delayed asynchronous secretion (Fig 4H and 4I) and caused steady-state phasic release (Fig 4D and 4F right panels; see also [38]), indicating efficient buffering of residual [Ca]i in our experiments. Importantly, wt neurons expressing either TRPC variant failed to promote any STE of synaptic signaling in the presence of EGTA (Fig 4D–4G). Both the AmpEPSC10/AmpEPSC1 ratio (Fig 4E) and the synchronous charge (Fig 4G) were significantly reduced when compared with the nontreated controls. These results indicate that enhanced buffering of global [Ca]i by EGTA abolishes the TRPC-mediated STE of synaptic signaling. Collectively, our results support a model wherein TRPC channels are rapidly activated by elevated levels of bulk [Ca]i (in response to Ca2+ entry through presynaptic voltage-gated Ca2+ channels) and in turn may amplify and prolong the presynaptic Ca2+ rise during HFS, thereby increasing the Ca2+ dependent rates of vesicle replenishment [43–45].
Homomeric TRPC5 channels promote STE of synaptic signaling
TRPC4 and TRPC5 are strongly potentiated by elevation of [Ca]i [9] and can functionally couple to the Ca2+ entry through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels [8,26]. In contrast, no such regulation has been reported for TRPC1 [27], appearing contradictory to our finding that TRPC1 caused strong STE during repetitive stimulation. To address this issue, we compared the functional consequences of TRPC1 and TRPC5 expression in tko neurons (Fig 5). Expression of TRPC5 caused a strong STE of synaptic signaling (Fig 5A, 5B and 5C) and reproduced the phenotype seen with τGFP-positive wt neurons (Fig 2). TRPC5 expression significantly increased the PPR (tko: 0.9 ± 0.03, tko + C5: 1.44 ± 0.07; p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA on ranks). It shifted the distribution of AmpEPSC10/AmpEPSC1 ratios (mean ± SEM: 1.71 ± 0.14) toward the STE range (Fig 5D, 5E and 5F) and strongly accelerated the rate of vesicle recruitment (Fig 5I), leading to activity-dependent increases in total synchronous as well as asynchronous charge transfer (Fig 5G–5L). Thus, homomeric TRPC5 channels profoundly regulate synaptic plasticity. In contrast, TRPC1 expression in tko neurons failed to cause similar changes in STE-supporting synaptic responses that were indistinguishable from those in controls (Fig 5).
This observation verifies that the synaptic plasticity phenotype observed with lentiviral expression is not simply a consequence of potential off-target effects. It further suggests that the STE phenotype of TRPC1 expression in wt neurons (Fig 3) most likely relies on the interaction with the other TRPC variants. The latter notion agrees with observations in heterologous expression systems in which no evidence for functional homomeric TRPC1 channels was found [21,46,47]. To extend these findings, we transfected mass cultures of hippocampal wt and tko neurons with either TRPC1 or TRPC5 and recorded spontaneous miniature EPSC (mEPSC) events in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX; 10μM; blocking voltage-gated Na+ channels [48]). Expression of TRPC5 or TRPC1 increased the mEPSC frequency in wt cells without changing the kinetics of quantal events, consistent with a presynaptic function of these channels (S6 Fig). In the absence of other TRPC isoforms, only TRPC5, but not TRPC1, expression increased the mEPSC frequency (S6C and S6D Fig). Taken together, homomeric TRPC5 channels profoundly regulate synaptic plasticity and elevate the rate of spontaneous release. In contrast, TRPC1 differentially affects synaptic signaling in wt and tko neurons, most likely because it requires heteromultimerization with other members of its TRPC subgroup to form functional channels.
Acute perturbation of TRPC activity interferes with synaptic signaling
To study whether acute inhibition of TRPC5 channels impairs synaptic efficacy, neurons were superfused with the TRPC5 inhibitor clemizole (3 μM, S7 Fig) [49]. In tko neurons expressing TRPC5, antagonist application significantly decreased STE of synaptic signaling and strongly reduced the asynchronous release when compared with the previous control response (S7B and S7C Fig). In contrast, clemizole neither affected synaptic depression nor asynchronous release in tko neurons, showing the specificity of the antagonist (S7D and S7E Fig). Collectively, the observed STE phenotype is due to immediate activation of TRPC channels during HFS, rather than being caused by developmental or compensatory mechanisms in response to TRPC channel expression.
We next investigated whether direct activation of endogenous TRPC channels by the specific TRPC4/C5-agonist Englerin A [50] influences synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Autaptic wt neurons responded to agonist application in the presence of TTX (10 μM) with a reversible inward current (maximum current amplitude: 558 ± 68 pA, n = 36), whereas no significant current response could be detected in tko cells, verifying the specificity of Englerin A (Fig 6A, 6B and 6C). Interestingly, TRPC-mediated permeability changes were often paralleled by a transient increase in mEPSC frequency (Fig 6D, green line), without changing the amplitude or kinetics of the mEPSCs (Fig 6E). This suggests that activation of endogenous TRPC4/5 channels can directly evoke synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Some wt neurons (12 out of 36 cells) failed to respond to Englerin A (mEPSC frequency increase <1.2-fold), which could be due to heterogeneities in the expression or subcellular localization of TRPC4/C5 in hippocampal neurons. On average, Englerin A evoked a 2-fold increase in the mEPSC frequency of wt neurons (2.0 ± 0.28-fold increase over baseline levels, Fig 6F) but had no effect in tko neurons. To study the ionic basis of the inward current evoked by Englerin A, we repeated these experiments in neurons, which are genetically deficient for vesicular soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins and are devoid of any glutamate release [48,51]. The results show that Englerin A evokes similarly large inward currents in the absence of any neurotransmitter release (S8 Fig). Thus, the observed inward current can be largely attributed to direct activation of TRPC channels rather than to secondary activation of glutamate receptors as a consequence of TRPC activity.
Collectively, these results are in line with an at least partial presynaptic localization of TRPC5 channels (S1 Fig) and compatible with the mEPSC frequency increase observed upon lentiviral TRPC expression (S6 Fig). They show that acute perturbation of TRPC activity is able to regulate STP and synaptic vesicle exocytosis.
Enhanced Ca2+-entry through VGCCs does not mimic the TRPC phenotype
TRPC channels may either directly mediate Ca2+ influx into synaptic terminals or indirectly modulate synaptic plasticity through facilitated opening of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. In the latter case, TRPC-channel–mediated depolarization of the membrane potential could ease VGCC opening and enhance Ca2+ entry into the presynaptic terminal. Broadening the presynaptic AP-width with the potassium channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA, 300μM) has been shown to enhance the VGCC-mediated Ca2+ influx and synaptic transmission during high-frequency stimulation [45]. Compared to the preceding control response, acute TEA application significantly increased the initial EPSC amplitude and decreased the PPR leading to an overall faster synaptic depression (Fig 7A–7D). These changes are paralleled by an increase in release probability (Fig 7G) and clearly contrast the TRPC phenotype. TEA also enhanced the synchronous release component and the RRP size. It furthermore augmented asynchronous secretion and increased the replenishment rate, consistent with a prolonged and stronger Ca2+ entry into synaptic terminals (Fig 7E–7K). Overall, the enhanced Ca2+ influx through VGCCs leads to stronger STD and clearly differs from the STE phenotype observed with higher TRPC activity. Thus, it is unlikely that synaptic TRPC channels merely increase the Ca2+ influx through depolarization-dependent modulation of VGCCs. The combined set of data suggests that TRPC channels provide an additional Ca2+ entry pathway most likely distal to the active zone, enabling efficient mobilization of dormant vesicles from the reserve pool and leading to STE of synaptic signaling during HFS.
TRPC channels augment the presynaptic Ca2+ rise upon HFS
To study how TRPC channels influence presynaptic Ca2+ dynamics, we combined electrophysiological recordings of synaptic activity with presynaptic Ca2+-imaging using the vesicle-associated Synaptophysin-GCaMP6s (SyGCaMP6s) fusion protein as a presynaptic Ca2+ reporter (Fig 8). In preparatory work, we verified that SyGCaMP6s is sorted to synaptic sites, as illustrated by its high degree of colocalization with the synaptic vesicle protein synaptobrevin II (SybII; Fig 8A). Autaptic neurons were stimulated with 20 Hz HFS for 2 s, while the synaptic charge transfer and [Ca]i changes at discrete synaptic sites were monitored simultaneously throughout the experiment. Discrete synaptic regions were analyzed when the fluorescence increase (ΔF/F0) exceeded 3 SDs of the background noise (ΔF/F0, mean ± SEM: 0.022 ± 0.00012). Wt neurons responded to electrical stimulation with a robust, activity-dependent increase in SyGCaMP fluorescence (Fig 8B and Fig 8C). Genetic loss of TRPC1/C4/C5 reduced the presynaptic Ca2+ rise, whereas the expression of either TRPC1 or TRPC5 strongly elevated presynaptic Ca2+ dynamics (Fig 8B, 8E and 8D). The slope of the fluorescence increase during HFS was nearly 2-fold higher in TRPC-expressing cells compared with wt neurons (Fig 8E), indicating that TRPC channels directly potentiate the VGCC-mediated increase in presynaptic Ca2+. Even after HFS, when VGCCs have closed, [Ca]i continued to increase more strongly in TRPC-expressing neurons than in wt and tko neurons (Fig 8F and 8G). These observations provide strong evidence that TRPC channels establish an additional Ca2+ entry pathway that functionally couples to the VGCC-mediated Ca2+-influx and is able to prolong the presynaptic Ca2+ signal. Importantly, alterations of the average vesicle replenishment rate determined from simultaneous electrophysiological recordings correlate well with the observed changes in presynaptic Ca2+ levels among the different groups (Fig 8I and 8J). Taken together, these observations demonstrate that TRPC channels augment and prolong the presynaptic Ca2+ increase upon HFS and, by this, set the pace of synaptic vesicle recruitment.
Discussion
Changing the strength of synaptic connections between neurons is subject to different short-lived or long-lasting regulation processes, with the underlying cellular mechanisms often remaining enigmatic. In the present study, we employed a variety of genetic and lentiviral expression strategies to unravel the functional impact of Ca2+-permeable TRPC channels on synaptic efficacy of hippocampal neurons. Our experiments provide first evidence that systematic alterations in the expression of endogenous TRPC5 channels lead to graded changes in the synaptic plasticity behavior of glutamatergic synapses. Lentiviral expression of TRPC proteins in combination with presynaptic Ca2+-imaging unveiled a TRPC-dependent augmentation and prolongation of the intraterminal Ca2+ signal that accelerates the rate of vesicle replenishment and boosts STE of synaptic signaling. Overall, the results identify hitherto unknown TRPC-mediated mechanisms which profoundly alter synaptic plasticity at synapses in the central nervous system (CNS).
Presynaptic TRPCs govern synaptic plasticity
Short-term synaptic plasticity regulates the strength of neurotransmission through facilitation and depression at the millisecond time scale and plays a key role in encoding information in the nervous system. VGCCs channels are the major source of Ca2+ entry for neurotransmission in the central nervous system. Yet, little is known about other Ca2+-entry channels, which may activate in response to Ca2+ influx through VGCCs and in turn further elevate the presynaptic Ca2+ rise. Such a scenario has been proposed for the activity-dependent activation of Ca2+-permeable transient receptor potential channels of the vanilloid subtype (TRPV1) receptors that promote asynchronous release from solitary tract afferents [52]. We have previously shown that [Ca]i elevations are essential and sufficient for the activation of TRPC5 [8]. TRPC5 channels are activated in a dose-dependent manner at submicromolar [Ca]i (effective concentration 50 [EC50] 635nM [8]) and are therefore well suited to sense changes in bulk [Ca]i. Furthermore, they respond to stepwise changes in [Ca]i at the millisecond time scale and thereby meet the speed requirements for regulating synaptic STP. Using independent experimental strategies, we show that TRPC channels reside at presynaptic sites and are able to regulate synaptic transmission. First, endogenous TRPC5 channels could be found in varicosity-like thickenings in which they colocalized with the presynaptic marker protein bassoon (S1 Fig). Second, genetic loss of TRPC1/C4/C5 reduced basal synaptic transmission, diminished the RRP size, and sped up the rate of synaptic depression during the HFS because of impeded vesicle recruitment (Fig 1). Third, acute activation of TRPC4/C5 channels by the agonist Englerin A stimulated an increase in mEPSC frequency, indicating that Ca2+ entry through TRPC channels is able to directly evoke small synaptic vesicle (SSV) exocytosis (Fig 6). Fourth, TRPC deficiency neither affected properties of quantal signaling, indicative of unchanged postsynaptic signal generation (S6 Fig), nor did it cause any changes in synapse number or organization (S4 Fig). Furthermore, by taking advantage of a TRPC5 channel reporter mouse strain (TRPC5-IC/eR26-τGFP), we avoided heterogeneities in channel expression and confined our measurements to neurons that express endogenous TRPC5 channels (Fig 2). These neurons exhibit strong STE of their synaptic response, enhanced asynchronous release, and an elevated replenishment rate. This behavior contrasts the classical synaptic depression during HFS usually observed in wt neurons and is characteristic for enhanced vesicle supply, leading to transient overfilling of the RRP during the stimulus train [53]. Moreover, loss of TRPC channels reduced presynaptic Ca2+ entry as documented by SyGCaMP6s measurements (Fig 8). Overall, these results show that endogenous TRPC channels crucially modulate presynaptic Ca2+ levels which in turn govern the rate of synaptic vesicle recruitment to release sites. These new observations also provide an attractive explanation for the functional deficits that underlie the impaired transient potentiation after 100 Hz stimulation in acute hippocampal slices of Trpc1/4/5−/− tko mice [37].
Expression of either TRPC variant (C1 or C5) profoundly influenced STP and switched short-term depression into STE of synaptic signaling (Fig 3). The activity-dependent increase in synchronous and asynchronous release during HFS together with a higher PPR is remarkably similar to the phenotype of τGFP-positive neurons expressing endogenous TRPC5. This indicates that TRPC5 activity is crucial for changing the mode of synaptic plasticity and excludes the possibility that STP changes with lentiviral expression are simply due to an excess of these ion channels. Furthermore, it stands to reason that TRPC5 expression in tko neurons did not merely rescue the plasticity phenotype of wt neurons but instead induced substantial STE (compare Fig 5 and Fig 1). This result is most likely due to the absence of TRPC5 in a subpopulation of wt neurons (S2 Fig) and may also be the consequence of higher TRPC5 expression levels upon lentiviral transduction.
In tko neurons, expression of TRPC5 suffices to produce strong changes in STP, whereas TRPC1 neither changed evoked nor spontaneous release (Fig 5; S6 Fig). Thus, TRPC5 channels can function as homomeric channels to control presynaptic Ca2+ dynamics, but TRPC1 requires other members of its subfamily, as has been also observed in heterologous expression systems [20]. Given that isolated TRPC1 channels neither function as Ca2+-entry channels [54] nor are they directly activated by Ca2+ [27], the effects of TRPC1 expression in wt neurons may be explained by alterations in the stoichiometry of presynaptic TRPC channels or by changes in their subcellular distribution. Furthermore, other functionally relevant interactions of TRPC1 either with members of the store operated calcium entry (SOCE) family (Orai1, and stromal interaction molecule 1 [STIM1], [27]) or with those of a different TRPC subgroup (e.g., TRPC3/C6/C7 [54]) cannot be rigorously excluded. Nevertheless, our results demonstrate that loss and surplus of TRPC activity affect STP of hippocampal neurons in an opposite manner, either increasing or decreasing synaptic depression.
A new model for the TRPC function in presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis
Given that TRPC5 channels functionally couple to VGCCs in heterologous expression systems [8], we hypothesize that Ca2+ entry through VGCCs may trigger TRPC channel openings, which lead to additional Ca2+ influx and thereby modulate presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis and synaptic plasticity. In good agreement, expression of either TRPC1 or C5 elevated the presynaptic Ca2+ rise right after the HFS, providing direct evidence that these ion channels are able to prolong the Ca2+ entry into presynaptic terminals (Fig 8). These observations are consistent with acute TRPC-mediated changes in presynaptic Ca2+ dynamics rather than overall alterations in presynaptic Ca2+ buffering. Moreover, the TRPC5 inhibitor clemizole acutely affects STE of synaptic signaling and asynchronous release, reinforcing the view that TRPC5 activity directly shapes presynaptic Ca2+ dynamics (S7 Fig).
Notably, the changes in presynaptic [Ca]i during HFS correlated well with alterations in the replenishment rates among the different groups (as observed with simultaneous electrophysiological recordings). In the same line, TRPC5 and C1 expression accelerated and strongly augmented the degree of recovery from synaptic depression, confirming that the TRPC-mediated Ca2+ permeability facilitates the refilling of the RRP through mobilization of synaptic vesicles from the reserve pool (S5 Fig).
In contrast to genetic TRPC deficiency, lentiviral transduction of TRPC channels in wt or tko neurons neither affected the first EPSC amplitude of the train response nor the RRP size (see Figs 1, 3, 5 and S3 Fig). It is possible that such changes are counterbalanced by high levels of spontaneous vesicle fusion as documented by the elevated mEPSC frequency of TRPC-expressing neurons (S6 Fig).
The comparative analyses between the TRPC1/C5 expression phenotype and the enhanced Ca2+ influx through VGCCs by TEA treatment revealed important functional differences (Fig 7). TEA-application enhanced asynchronous release and the vesicle replenishment rate but also increased the first EPSC amplitude, reduced the PPR, and showed a stronger synaptic depression during HFS. The latter results are characteristic of a higher release probability in the presence of TEA (see also [45,55]) and are most likely due to increased presynaptic [Ca]i in close proximity to the fusion site. Yet, they clearly differ from the TRPC expression phenotype, indicating that activation of distinct synaptic Ca2+ permeabilities differentially affects STP characteristics varying between STD and STE. An attractive explanation could be that VGCCs cluster at active zones [56], whereas TRPCs may reside at perisynaptic sites. In support of such a hypothesis, we found that preincubation with EGTA fully abolishes the TRPC effects on short-term plasticity (Fig 4). Assuming low millimolar concentrations of EGTA (approximately 1 mM) at the synaptic site, the Ca2+ buffer will chelate Ca2+ ions with a time constant of about 100 μs (τchelation [57]). Under these conditions and for a Ca2+ diffusion coefficient (DCa) of 2.2 × 10−6 cm2sec−1 [58] Ca2+ can diffuse more than 350 nm (r2 = 6 × DCa × τchelation) before efficient chelation by EGTA. These estimates are consistent with the idea that TRPC channels may reside at farther distances from the active zone, making them well positioned to enhance preferentially the Ca2+-dependent mobilization of reluctant vesicles from the reserve pool. Collectively, these experiments show that different types of synaptic plasticity result from enhanced Ca2+ influx through either VGCCs or TRPCs. They suggest that presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis is a highly orchestrated process based on different compartmentalized Ca2+ entry pathways to ensure that efficient vesicle recruitment matches the high rates of vesicle fusion upon ongoing synaptic activity.
Alterations in TRPC channel expression may contribute to the known variability of synaptic strength and plasticity in hippocampal neurons [59]. Furthermore, the STP characteristics of enhanced TRPC activity are remarkably similar to those observed in mammalian uncoordinated 13–2 (Munc13-2) dependent synapses [60], including the frequency-dependent facilitation during HFS and the post-train augmentation (i.e., increased EPSC amplitudes after high-frequency train). Munc13-2 has been shown to facilitate basal synaptic vesicle (SV) priming, STE of synaptic signaling [61], and is recruited to synapses by the active zone protein glutamic acid/leucine/lysine/serine‐rich protein (ELKS1) [62]. Intriguingly, synaptic vesicle priming factor proteins like Munc13-2 or Double C2-protein (Doc2) [63], which sense Ca2+ either with their C2-domains or in a complex with calmodulin, are translocated to the plasma membrane in a Ca2+-dependent manner [64] and may serve as transducers of the TRPC-mediated effects on vesicle replenishment and short-term plasticity. Similarly, other EF-hand proteins such as the neuronal calcium sensor 1 (NCS1) protein may contribute to the TRPC phenotype. NCS1 is enriched in presynaptic terminals [65], interacts with TRPC channels [18], and has a strong impact on short-term plasticity of hippocampal neurons. Interestingly, overexpression of NCS1 in hippocampal neurons mimics the phenotype of STE [65] observed with TRPC5 expression, making it possible that both proteins are engaged in the same signaling pathway.
Taken together, our results identify TRPC channels as important modulators of presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis and plasticity of fast glutamatergic synapses. They indicate that TRPC channels amplify the presynaptic Ca2+ rise and elevate the rate of synaptic vesicle recruitment to cope with vesicle consumption during high neuronal activity. Thus, TRPC-mediated changes in synaptic plasticity are well suited to play a central role for information processing in the central nervous system.
Material and methods
Cell culture and animals
TRPC1/C4/C5-tko mice were generated as described previously by Broker-Lai and colleagues [37]. Autaptic cultures of hippocampal neurons from age-matched TRPC tko, wt (C56BI/6N strain), and TRPC5-IC/eR26-τGFP mice were prepared from P0-1 animals as described previously by Schwarz and colleagues [66]. v-SNARE knockout animals (syb2−/− or syb2−/−/ceb−/−-dko) and their littermate control were prepared at E18.5. Briefly, hippocampi were dissected from the brain and digested for 20 mins at 37°C with 10 units of papain (Worthington, NJ), followed by gentle mechanical trituration. Neurons were seeded at low density (1,000 cells/ml) onto a layer of glial microislands, resulting in co‐cultures of glia and neurons. For electrophysiological recordings, only islands with single neurons were used. For mass cultures, neurons were seeded with a density of 300 cells/mm2 on 25-mm cover slips coated with 0.5 mg/ml of poly‐D‐lysine (Sigma, Germany). Cultures were maintained at 37°C in an incubator, humidified with 95% air and 5% CO2 in NBA (Invitrogen), supplemented with 2% B‐27 (Sigma, Germany), 1% Glutamax (Invitrogen, Germany), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Germany). Recordings were performed at room temperature on 9 to 13 days of culture.
Construction of the TRPC5-IRES-Cre (TRPC5-IC) targeting vector
The final targeting construct includes a 5ʹ TRPC5 homology arm, an IRES-Cre-pgk promoter-driven Flp recombination target (FRT)–neomycin (neo)–FRT cassette and a 3ʹ TRPC5 homology arm. Using genomic R1 mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell DNA, the 2587-bp 3ʹ homology arm containing sequence downstream of the final exon of TRPC5 (exon 11) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). By incorporation of restriction enzyme sequences within the primers, an AscI site was added 5ʹ to the homology arm and a BamHI site added at the 3ʹ end, and the fragment was subcloned into pKO-DTA. Using a similar strategy, the 2417-bp 5ʹ homology arm containing the stop codon of TRPC5 was generated and also cloned into the vector using XhoI and AscI (New England Biolabs, Germany) sites. PCR amplification of both homology arms was undertaken using the high-fidelity pfu DNA polymerase to minimize PCR-induced mutations, and any nucleotides that differed from the database sequence upon sequence analysis were verified by independent PCR amplification and sequencing. In a final step, the IRES-Cre-pgk promoter-driven FRT-neo-FRT cassette was cloned into the AscI (New England Biolabs, Germany) site found at the junction of the 2 homology arms. The completed targeting construct was then further verified by a complete sequence analysis and restriction mapping.
Gene targeting
Following verification of the integrity of the targeting construct, plasmid DNA was linearized using the NotI enzyme and then electroporated into R1 ES cells at the GIGA institute, University of Liege. Following electroporation, Southern blot analysis was utilized to identify correctly targeted clones, and these were then used to generate mice following standard protocols (injection of ES cells [129/Sv] into blastocysts [C57BL/6], implantation of injected blastocysts into foster mothers, backcross of male chimeras with C57BL6 females). F1 animals resulting from backcrosses were then crossed with FLP-deleter mice, which contain a ubiquitously expressed FLP recombinase gene, to facilitate removal of the neomycin selection cassette.
Viral contructs/transfections
The cDNAs encoding for TRPC1, TRPC5 (NCBI accession numbers NM_011643 and NM_009428.2), and SyGcamp6s (Addgene #26124) were subcloned into the plenti-hsynapsin lentiviral transfer vector. mRFP was fused to the C-terminal end of TRPC5 with a flexible 12 amino acid linker sequence. All constructs were verified by DNA sequence analysis (MWG Germany). Lentiviral particles were produced as previously described by Schwarz and colleagues [66]. Primary neurons were transfected with 100 to 300 μL of viral suspension 1-3DIC.
Drug treatment
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless stated otherwise. For Englerin A (Roth, Germany 0.2–1 μM), TEA, clemizole (Tocris, United Kingdom), and sucrose experiments, neurons were rapidly superfused using a gravity-fed fast-flow system. For EGTA-AM pretreatment, neurons were incubated for 5 min in nominally Ca2+ free Ringer’s solution in the presence of 300 μ M EGTA-AM (Merck, Germany) and subsequently washed with Ca2+-containing Ringer’s solution before recording.
Electrophysiological measurements of synaptic currents
Synaptic currents were recorded in the whole-cell voltage clamp mode from autaptic neurons. Patch pipettes (Rtip 4–5.5 MOhm) were filled with the following intracellular solution (in mM): 137.5 K-gluconate, 11 NaCl, 2 MgATP, 0.2 Na2GTP, 1.1 EGTA, 11 HEPES, and 11 D-glucose (pH 7.3) with KOH. The standard extracellular solution containing (in mM) 130 NaCl, 10 NaHCO3, 2.4 KCl, 1 to 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 D-glucose (pH 7.3) with NaOH, osmolarity 299 mOsm was used. D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (APV; 50 μM) was added to inhibit NMDA-receptors and prevent synaptic plasticity changes. The reversal potential of chloride-mediated currents was adjusted to the holding potential to avoid the potential contribution of GABAergic currents. Exemplary neurons were treated with 25 μ M DNQX (Sigma, Germany) to confirm the recordings of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) currents. Neurons were voltage-clamped at -70 mV with an EPC10 amplifier (HEKA Electronic, Germany) under control of Pulse 8.5 program (HEKA Electronic, Germany) and stimulated by membrane depolarizations to +10 mV for 0.7 ms every 5 s (0.2 Hz). Cells with an average access resistance of 6 to 15 mOhm, with 75% to 80% resistance compensation and <100 pA leak-current were analyzed. Current signals were low-pass filtered at 2.9 kHz (4 pole Bessel filter EPSC10) and digitized at a rate of 10 or 50 kHz. Spontaneous mEPSCs were recorded prior to stimulation. mEPSC recordings in mass neuronal cultures were performed in the presence of TTX (10μM). To determine mEPSC properties with reasonable fidelity and to prevent the detection of “false events” (due to random noise fluctuations), spontaneous mEPSCs with a peak amplitude exceeding >5 times the standard deviation of the baseline noise and a charge criterion >25 fC were analyzed using a commercial software (Mini Analysis, Synaptosoft, Version 6.0.3). The AP-evoked EPSC amplitude and charge were determined from the average of 10 EPSCs recorded at 0.2 Hz.
In hypertonic sucrose experiments, neurons were rapidly superfused with sucrose solution (500 mM sucrose, 5 s) using a gravity-fed fast-flow system. The RRP size was quantified from the charge integral of the current signal in response to sucrose application after subtracting the steady-state current component (determined at the end of hypertonic sucrose application), which probably reflects steady-state vesicle replenishment and exocytosis during hypertonic challenges [42].
The RRP size during HFS was quantified from the cumulative synchronous EPSC charge integral during the 20 Hz train. For this, the total charge of each AP evoked response within the train was corrected by subtracting the integral of the steady-state current component (= asynchronous charge) determined at the end of the stimulus interval [66]. The cumulative plot of the resulting synchronous release component reports the decrement in RRP size followed by a sustained phase of charge increase reflecting the steady-state phase of ongoing RRP vesicle replenishment. The sustained phase of secretion (last 5 data points) was approximated by linear regression. When back-extrapolated to time 0, its y-intercept provides an estimate of the RRP size with minimal contribution of refilling (see Fig 1L).
Imaging SyGCaMP6s responses
SyGCaMP6s fluorescence was acquired with an Evolve EMCCD camera (Visitron, Germany) using a Zeiss Plan Apochromat 40× oil immersion objective (NA 1.3) on a Axiovert200 microscope (Zeiss). Autaptic neurons were stimulated with 20 Hz for 2 s. Fluorescent images were captured at 5 Hz with custom written macros in VisiView (Visitron, Germany), processed offline using ImageJ 1.43 software and SigmaPlot 13. The background subtraction was done by subtracting the F0 image (average of 3 prestimulus images) from all subsequent images (ΔFn = Fn − F0). Regions of interest of identical size (4 × 4 pixels) were placed over single synapses reacting to electrical stimulation, and fluorescence changes were tracked throughout the stack.
Immuncytochemistry
Neurons were fixed for 10 min (RT) in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were quenched for 10 min with 50mM NH4Cl in PBS, blocked for 30 min in PBS containing 3% BSA and 0.1% TritonX100. Primary (anti-TRPC5, 1:100, affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal home-made; anti-bassoon, 1:500, mouse monoclonal, Synaptic Systems; anti-GFP, 1:500, guinea pig; Synaptic Systems, anti-PSD95, 1:500, rabbit polyclonal, Synaptic Systems, Germany) and secondary antibodies (1:1,000, Alexa-Fluor 555, Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 643-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit; Invitrogen, Germany) were diluted in blocking buffer. The anti-TRPC5 antibody was generated by immunization of rabbits with a C-terminal protein fragment (amino acids 766–969) of mouse TRPC5 (NCBI accession number NM_009428.2). Cells were incubated with primary and secondary antibodies overnight and for 1.5 h at RT, respectively. In some experiments, cells were treated with DAPI (200 nM; Invitrogen, Germany) for 5 min at RT before mounting in glycerol cells were imaged either on a confocal microscope (LSM 710; Zeiss, Germany) using AxioVision 2008 software (Zeiss, Germany) or an Axiovert200 (Zeiss, Germany), fluorescence was elicited with a Polychrome V monochromator (Till Photonics, Germany) and captured with a EMCCD camera (Evolve, Visitron, Germany). The following objectives and filter sets were used: 100×, 1.3 NA; 63×, 1.4 NA; 40×, 1.3 NA; 25×, 0.8 NA oil objectives, Zeiss 10 (BP 450–490; FT 510, BP 515–565), Zeiss 09 (BP 450–490, FT 510, LP 515), Zeiss 15 (BP 546/12, FT 580, LP 590), Zeiss 38 (BP 470/40, FT 495, LP BP 525/50), respectively.
Image analysis
Images were analyzed with the software package ImageJ (version 1.45), AxioVision 2008 software (Zeiss, Germany), and SigmaPlot 13.0 (Systat Software, Inc.). For confocal imaging, optical sectioning was achieved with a 1 airy unit pinhole setting. In case of z-stack acquisition, horizontal image planes were separated by 0.480 μm in the stack. The acquisition settings were optimized to avoid underexposure and oversaturation effects and kept equal throughout image acquisition of control versus knockout samples. Thresholding and background corrections were performed with identical settings for a given set of images acquired from control versus knockout samples. Presynaptic boutons were identified in single planes of the anti-bassoon image stacks in fine axonal structures to avoid contaminations with somatic TRPC5 fluorescence. Identified regions of interest (ROIs) were stored and used to quantify the Mander´s colocalization coefficient between bassoon and TRPC5. For confocal imaging, the percentage of TRPC5 and τGFP immunopositive cells was quantified relative to the number of nuclei profiles visible in the corresponding 40× bright field image. The number of TRPC5 positive cells was quantified by counting the number of DAPI positive nuclei that showed somatic TRPC5 staining. The number of synapses was determined after the images were subjected to uniform background subtraction (23 ± 2.1 au). Identical ROIs (3 × 3 pixels) were placed around bassoon-positive puncta on the entire autaptic neuron cell surface area throughout the stack (15–28 sections). Presynaptic bassoon-positive puncta were counted manually. To examine the spatial relationship between pre- and postsynaptic marker proteins, images were thresholded with 3× SD of the background fluorescence for PSD-95 and with a uniform threshold of 75 au for bassoon. Bassoon-positive puncta were detected using the Analyze Particle function in ImageJ. Enlarged ROIs (up to a 770 nm distance from the bassoon signal = “bassoon area”) were superimposed onto the PSD95 channel to determine the degree of colocalization and/or juxtaposition of both immunosignals within the ‘bassoon area’.
Statistical analysis
Values are given as means ± SEM. To determine statistically significant differences, one-way ANOVA and a Student t test for comparing groups were used, if not indicated otherwise. The similarity of variances between groups was tested when performing statistics in SigmaPlot, and statistical tests were chosen accordingly. Normality was tested (Shapiro-Wilk). Multiple comparisons were performed using the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes; however, sample sizes were similar to those employed in the field. Data collection and analyses were not performed blind to the experimental condition; no method of randomization was done.
Online supplemental material
S1 Fig shows the subcellular distribution of TRPC5 channels in hippocampal neurons. S2 Fig shows the genetic targeting strategy used to express Cre recombinase under control of the TRPC5 promoter and the heterogeneous expression of TRPC5 in hippocampal neurons. S3 Fig shows that TRPC channels do not affect the basal release probability. S4 Fig shows that neither loss nor expression of TRPC channels affects the synapse number. S5 Fig shows that increased TRPC activity increases the rate of recovery from short-term depression. S6 Fig shows that increased TRPC5 activity elevates the mEPSC frequency. S7 Fig shows that the TRPC antagonist clemizole reduces STE of synaptic signaling. S8 Fig shows the Englerin A evoked inward current reports direct activation of TRPC5 channels.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Wirth, V. Schmitt, and W. Frisch for excellent technical assistance and Drs. M. Dhara, R. Mohrmann, D. Stevens, and J. Rettig for helpful discussions.
Abbreviations
- Amp
amplitude
- AMPAR
AMPA receptor
- AP
action potential
- APV
D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate
- Ca]i
intracellular calcium concentration
- CNS
central nervous system
- Cre
Cre-recombinase
- DAPI
4′,6-Diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride
- Doc2
Double C2-protein
- EA
Engerlin A
- EC50
effective concentration 50
- EGTA-AM
ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid acetoxymethyl ester
- ELKS1
glutamic acid/leucine/lysine/serine‐rich protein
- EMCCD
electron multiplying charge coupled device
- EPSC
evoked postsynaptic current
- eR26
ROSA26-floxed-stop
- ES
embryonic stem
- FRT
Flp recombination target
- HFS
high-frequency stimulation
- IC
internal ribosomal entry site cre recombinase
- IRES
internal ribosome entry site
- KI
knockin
- mEPSC
miniature excitatory postsynaptic current, mRFP, monomeric red fluorescent protein
- Munc13-2
mammalian uncoordinated 13–2
- NCS1
neuronal calcium sensor 1
- neo
neomycin
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- PPR
paired-pulse ratio
- Pr
release probability
- PSD-95
post-synaptic density protein 95
- ROI
region of interest
- RRP
readily releasable pool
- SNARE
soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment receptor
- SOCE
store operated calcium entry
- SSV
small synaptic vesicle
- STD
short-term depression
- STE
short-term enhancement
- STIM1
stromal interaction molecule 1
- STP
short-term plasticity
- SV
synaptic vesicle
- SybII
synaptobrevin II
- SyGCaMP6s
Synaptophysin-GCaMP6s
- TEA
tetraethylammonium
- tko
triple knockout
- TRP
transient receptor potential
- TRPC
transient receptor potential canonical
- TRPV1
transient receptor potential channels of the vanilloid subtype
- TTX
tetrodotoxin
- VGCC
voltage-gated calcium channel
- VM
membrane voltage
- wt
wild type
- ΔF
delta fluorescence
- τGFP
τ-green fluorescent protein
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the framework of the Collaborative Research Center/Transregio 152 to DB, YS, MF, UB and VF and by the Collaborative Research Center 894 to PW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Borst JG, Sakmann B. Calcium influx and transmitter release in a fast CNS synapse. Nature. 1996. October 3;383(6599):431–4. 10.1038/383431a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Regehr WG. Short-term presynaptic plasticity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012. July 1;4(7):a005702 10.1101/cshperspect.a005702 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gees M, Colsoul B, Nilius B. The role of transient receptor potential cation channels in Ca2+ signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010. October;2(10):a003962 10.1101/cshperspect.a003962 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hofmann T, Obukhov AG, Schaefer M, Harteneck C, Gudermann T, Schultz G. Direct activation of human TRPC6 and TRPC3 channels by diacylglycerol. Nature. 1999. January 21;397(6716):259–63. 10.1038/16711 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu X, Cheng KT, Bandyopadhyay BC, Pani B, Dietrich A, Paria BC, et al. Attenuation of store-operated Ca2+ current impairs salivary gland fluid secretion in TRPC1(-/-) mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. October 30;104(44):17542–7. 10.1073/pnas.0701254104 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yuan JP, Zeng W, Huang GN, Worley PF, Muallem S. STIM1 heteromultimerizes TRPC channels to determine their function as store-operated channels. Nature cell biology. 2007. June;9(6):636–45. 10.1038/ncb1590 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liao Y, Erxleben C, Abramowitz J, Flockerzi V, Zhu MX, Armstrong DL, et al. Functional interactions among Orai1, TRPCs, and STIM1 suggest a STIM-regulated heteromeric Orai/TRPC model for SOCE/Icrac channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008. February 26;105(8):2895–900. 10.1073/pnas.0712288105 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gross SA, Guzman GA, Wissenbach U, Philipp SE, Zhu MX, Bruns D, et al. TRPC5 is a Ca2+-activated channel functionally coupled to Ca2+-selective ion channels. J Biol Chem. 2009. December 04;284(49):34423–32. 10.1074/jbc.M109.018192 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blair NT, Kaczmarek JS, Clapham DE. Intracellular calcium strongly potentiates agonist-activated TRPC5 channels. J Gen Physiol. 2009. May;133(5):525–46. 10.1085/jgp.200810153 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kinoshita-Kawada M, Tang J, Xiao R, Kaneko S, Foskett JK, Zhu MX. Inhibition of TRPC5 channels by Ca2+-binding protein 1 in Xenopus oocytes. Pflugers Arch. 2005. August;450(5):345–54. 10.1007/s00424-005-1419-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Faber ES, Sedlak P, Vidovic M, Sah P. Synaptic activation of transient receptor potential channels by metabotropic glutamate receptors in the lateral amygdala. Neuroscience. 2006. February;137(3):781–94. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.09.027 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stroh O, Freichel M, Kretz O, Birnbaumer L, Hartmann J, Egger V. NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic activation of TRPC channels in olfactory bulb granule cells. J Neurosci. 2012. April 25;32(17):5737–46. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3753-11.2012 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim SJ, Kim YS, Yuan JP, Petralia RS, Worley PF, Linden DJ. Activation of the TRPC1 cation channel by metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR1. Nature. 2003. November 20;426(6964):285–91. 10.1038/nature02162 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Phelan KD, Shwe UT, Abramowitz J, Wu H, Rhee SW, Howell MD, et al. Canonical transient receptor channel 5 (TRPC5) and TRPC1/4 contribute to seizure and excitotoxicity by distinct cellular mechanisms. Mol Pharmacol. 2013. February;83(2):429–38. 10.1124/mol.112.082271 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou J, Du W, Zhou K, Tai Y, Yao H, Jia Y, et al. Critical role of TRPC6 channels in the formation of excitatory synapses. Nat Neurosci. 2008. July;11(7):741–3. 10.1038/nn.2127 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Greka A, Navarro B, Oancea E, Duggan A, Clapham DE. TRPC5 is a regulator of hippocampal neurite length and growth cone morphology. Nat Neurosci. 2003. August;6(8):837–45. 10.1038/nn1092 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li Y, Jia YC, Cui K, Li N, Zheng ZY, Wang YZ, et al. Essential role of TRPC channels in the guidance of nerve growth cones by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Nature. 2005. April 14;434(7035):894–8. 10.1038/nature03477 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hui H, McHugh D, Hannan M, Zeng F, Xu SZ, Khan SU, et al. Calcium-sensing mechanism in TRPC5 channels contributing to retardation of neurite outgrowth. J Physiol. 2006. April 1;572(Pt 1):165–72. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102889 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Montell C, Birnbaumer L, Flockerzi V. The TRP channels, a remarkably functional family. Cell. 2002. March 08;108(5):595–8. 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00670-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hofmann T, Schaefer M, Schultz G, Gudermann T. Subunit composition of mammalian transient receptor potential channels in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002. May 28;99(11):7461–6. 10.1073/pnas.102596199 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Strubing C, Krapivinsky G, Krapivinsky L, Clapham DE. TRPC1 and TRPC5 form a novel cation channel in mammalian brain. Neuron. 2001. March;29(3):645–55. 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00240-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Freichel M, Vennekens R, Olausson J, Stolz S, Philipp SE, Weissgerber P, et al. Functional role of TRPC proteins in native systems: implications from knockout and knock-down studies. J Physiol. 2005. August 15;567(Pt 1):59–66. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092999 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen YF, Chiu WT, Chen YT, Lin PY, Huang HJ, Chou CY, et al. Calcium store sensor stromal-interaction molecule 1-dependent signaling plays an important role in cervical cancer growth, migration, and angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. September 13;108(37):15225–30. 10.1073/pnas.1103315108 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fowler MA, Sidiropoulou K, Ozkan ED, Phillips CW, Cooper DC. Corticolimbic expression of TRPC4 and TRPC5 channels in the rodent brain. PLoS ONE. 2007. June 27;2(6):e573 10.1371/journal.pone.0000573 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Philipp S, Hambrecht J, Braslavski L, Schroth G, Freichel M, Murakami M, et al. A novel capacitative calcium entry channel expressed in excitable cells. EMBO J. 1998. August 3;17(15):4274–82. 10.1093/emboj/17.15.4274 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tsvilovskyy VV, Zholos AV, Aberle T, Philipp SE, Dietrich A, Zhu MX, et al. Deletion of TRPC4 and TRPC6 in mice impairs smooth muscle contraction and intestinal motility in vivo. Gastroenterology. 2009. October;137(4):1415–24. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.046 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cheng KT, Liu X, Ong HL, Swaim W, Ambudkar IS. Local Ca(2)+ entry via Orai1 regulates plasma membrane recruitment of TRPC1 and controls cytosolic Ca(2)+ signals required for specific cell functions. PLoS Biol. 2011. March;9(3):e1001025 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001025 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shim S, Goh EL, Ge S, Sailor K, Yuan JP, Roderick HL, et al. XTRPC1-dependent chemotropic guidance of neuronal growth cones. Nat Neurosci. 2005. June;8(6):730–5. 10.1038/nn1459 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bezzerides VJ, Ramsey IS, Kotecha S, Greka A, Clapham DE. Rapid vesicular translocation and insertion of TRP channels. Nat Cell Biol. 2004. August;6(8):709–20. 10.1038/ncb1150 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sabourin J, Le Gal L, Saurwein L, Haefliger JA, Raddatz E, Allagnat F. Store-operated Ca2+ Entry Mediated by Orai1 and TRPC1 Participates to Insulin Secretion in Rat beta-Cells. J Biol Chem. 2015. December 18;290(51):30530–9. 10.1074/jbc.M115.682583 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Munsch T, Freichel M, Flockerzi V, Pape HC. Contribution of transient receptor potential channels to the control of GABA release from dendrites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003. December 23;100(26):16065–70. 10.1073/pnas.2535311100 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Obukhov AG, Nowycky MC. TRPC5 activation kinetics are modulated by the scaffolding protein ezrin/radixin/moesin-binding phosphoprotein-50 (EBP50). J Cell Physiol. 2004. November;201(2):227–35. 10.1002/jcp.20057 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Riccio A, Li Y, Tsvetkov E, Gapon S, Yao GL, Smith KS, et al. Decreased anxiety-like behavior and Galphaq/11-dependent responses in the amygdala of mice lacking TRPC4 channels. J Neurosci. 2014. March 5;34(10):3653–67. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2274-13.2014 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hartmann J, Dragicevic E, Adelsberger H, Henning HA, Sumser M, Abramowitz J, et al. TRPC3 channels are required for synaptic transmission and motor coordination. Neuron. 2008. August 14;59(3):392–8. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.009 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lepannetier S, Gualdani R, Tempesta S, Schakman O, Seghers F, Kreis A, et al. Activation of TRPC1 Channel by Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor mGluR5 Modulates Synaptic Plasticity and Spatial Working Memory. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:318 10.3389/fncel.2018.00318 . Pubmed Central PMCID: 6149316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Riccio A, Li Y, Moon J, Kim KS, Smith KS, Rudolph U, et al. Essential role for TRPC5 in amygdala function and fear-related behavior. Cell. 2009. May 15;137(4):761–72. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.039 . Pubmed Central PMCID: 2719954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Broker-Lai J, Kollewe A, Schindeldecker B, Pohle J, Nguyen Chi V, Mathar I, et al. Heteromeric channels formed by TRPC1, TRPC4 and TRPC5 define hippocampal synaptic transmission and working memory. EMBO J. 2017. September 15;36(18):2770–89. 10.15252/embj.201696369 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Otsu Y, Shahrezaei V, Li B, Raymond LA, Delaney KR, Murphy TH. Competition between phasic and asynchronous release for recovered synaptic vesicles at developing hippocampal autaptic synapses. J Neurosci. 2004. January 14;24(2):420–33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4452-03.2004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wen S, Gotze IN, Mai O, Schauer C, Leinders-Zufall T, Boehm U. Genetic identification of GnRH receptor neurons: a new model for studying neural circuits underlying reproductive physiology in the mouse brain. Endocrinology. 2011. April;152(4):1515–26. 10.1210/en.2010-1208 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mizuguchi H, Xu Z, Ishii-Watabe A, Uchida E, Hayakawa T. IRES-dependent second gene expression is significantly lower than cap-dependent first gene expression in a bicistronic vector. Mol Ther. 2000. April;1(4):376–82. 10.1006/mthe.2000.0050 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Neher E. Merits and Limitations of Vesicle Pool Models in View of Heterogeneous Populations of Synaptic Vesicles. Neuron. 2015. September 23;87(6):1131–42. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.038 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rosenmund C, Stevens CF. Definition of the readily releasable pool of vesicles at hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 1996. June;16(6):1197–207. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80146-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dittman JS, Regehr WG. Calcium dependence and recovery kinetics of presynaptic depression at the climbing fiber to Purkinje cell synapse. J Neurosci. 1998. August 15;18(16):6147–62. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stevens CF, Wesseling JF. Activity-dependent modulation of the rate at which synaptic vesicles become available to undergo exocytosis. Neuron. 1998. August;21(2):415–24. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80550-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang LY, Kaczmarek LK. High-frequency firing helps replenish the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles. Nature. 1998. July 23;394(6691):384–8. 10.1038/28645 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Strubing C, Krapivinsky G, Krapivinsky L, Clapham DE. Formation of novel TRPC channels by complex subunit interactions in embryonic brain. J Biol Chem. 2003. October 3;278(40):39014–9. 10.1074/jbc.M306705200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Storch U, Forst AL, Philipp M, Gudermann T, Mederos y Schnitzler M. Transient receptor potential channel 1 (TRPC1) reduces calcium permeability in heteromeric channel complexes. J Biol Chem. 2012. January 27;287(5):3530–40. 10.1074/jbc.M111.283218 . Pubmed Central PMCID: 3271006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Guzman RE, Schwarz YN, Rettig J, Bruns D. SNARE force synchronizes synaptic vesicle fusion and controls the kinetics of quantal synaptic transmission. J Neurosci. 2010. August 04;30(31):10272–81. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1551-10.2010 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Richter JM, Schaefer M, Hill K. Clemizole hydrochloride is a novel and potent inhibitor of transient receptor potential channel TRPC5. Mol Pharmacol. 2014. November;86(5):514–21. 10.1124/mol.114.093229 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Akbulut Y, Gaunt HJ, Muraki K, Ludlow MJ, Amer MS, Bruns A, et al. (-)-Englerin A is a potent and selective activator of TRPC4 and TRPC5 calcium channels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015. March 16;54(12):3787–91. 10.1002/anie.201411511 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Borisovska M, Zhao Y, Tsytsyura Y, Glyvuk N, Takamori S, Matti U, et al. v-SNAREs control exocytosis of vesicles from priming to fusion. EMBO J. 2005. June 15;24(12):2114–26. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600696 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Peters JH, McDougall SJ, Fawley JA, Smith SM, Andresen MC. Primary afferent activation of thermosensitive TRPV1 triggers asynchronous glutamate release at central neurons. Neuron. 2010. March 11;65(5):657–69. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.017 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zucker RS, Regehr WG. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002;64:355–405. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Storch U, Mederos y Schnitzler M, Gudermann T. G protein-mediated stretch reception. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012. March 15;302(6):H1241–9. 10.1152/ajpheart.00818.2011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hagler DJ Jr., Goda Y. Properties of synchronous and asynchronous release during pulse train depression in cultured hippocampal neurons. Journal of neurophysiology. 2001. June;85(6):2324–34. 10.1152/jn.2001.85.6.2324 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang LY, Augustine GJ. Presynaptic nanodomains: a tale of two synapses. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:455 10.3389/fncel.2014.00455 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Adler EM, Augustine GJ, Duffy SN, Charlton MP. Alien intracellular calcium chelators attenuate neurotransmitter release at the squid giant synapse. J Neurosci. 1991. June;11(6):1496–507. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nakamura Y, Reva M, DiGregorio DA. Variations in Ca(2+) Influx Can Alter Chelator-Based Estimates of Ca(2+) Channel-Synaptic Vesicle Coupling Distance. J Neurosci. 2018. April 18;38(16):3971–87. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2061-17.2018 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Korber C, Kuner T. Molecular Machines Regulating the Release Probability of Synaptic Vesicles at the Active Zone. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2016;8:5 10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00005 . Pubmed Central PMCID: 4773589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Junge HJ, Rhee JS, Jahn O, Varoqueaux F, Spiess J, Waxham MN, et al. Calmodulin and Munc13 form a Ca2+ sensor/effector complex that controls short-term synaptic plasticity. Cell. 2004. August 6;118(3):389–401. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rosenmund C, Sigler A, Augustin I, Reim K, Brose N, Rhee JS. Differential control of vesicle priming and short-term plasticity by Munc13 isoforms. Neuron. 2002. January 31;33(3):411–24. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00568-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kawabe H, Mitkovski M, Kaeser PS, Hirrlinger J, Opazo F, Nestvogel D, et al. ELKS1 localizes the synaptic vesicle priming protein bMunc13-2 to a specific subset of active zones. J Cell Biol. 2017. April 3;216(4):1143–61. 10.1083/jcb.201606086 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Houy S, Groffen AJ, Ziomkiewicz I, Verhage M, Pinheiro PS, Sorensen JB. Doc2B acts as a calcium sensor for vesicle priming requiring synaptotagmin-1, Munc13-2 and SNAREs. Elife. 2017. December 23;6 10.7554/eLife.27000 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ashery U, Varoqueaux F, Voets T, Betz A, Thakur P, Koch H, et al. Munc13-1 acts as a priming factor for large dense-core vesicles in bovine chromaffin cells. EMBO J. 2000. July 17;19(14):3586–96. 10.1093/emboj/19.14.3586 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sippy T, Cruz-Martin A, Jeromin A, Schweizer FE. Acute changes in short-term plasticity at synapses with elevated levels of neuronal calcium sensor-1. Nat Neurosci. 2003. October;6(10):1031–8. 10.1038/nn1117 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schwarz Y, Zhao N, Kirchhoff F, Bruns D. Astrocytes control synaptic strength by two distinct v-SNARE-dependent release pathways. Nat Neurosci. 2017. November;20(11):1529–39. 10.1038/nn.4647 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.