Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Oct 2;9:14173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50448-x

The impact of exposure to cafeteria diet during pregnancy or lactation on offspring growth and adiposity before weaning

Grace George 1, Sally A V Draycott 1, Ronan Muir 1, Bethan Clifford 1, Matthew J Elmes 1,✉, Simon C Langley-Evans 1
PMCID: PMC6775089  PMID: 31578441

Abstract

Exposure to maternal obesity during early-life can have adverse consequences for offspring growth and adiposity. We aimed to assess the relative contributions of exposure to maternal obesity, induced by a highly varied cafeteria diet, during pregnancy and lactation on these measures in rat offspring prior to weaning. Female Wistar rats were fed either a control (C) or cafeteria diet (O) for 8 weeks before mating, throughout pregnancy and lactation. Offspring were cross-fostered at birth to a dam on the same (CC,OO) or alternate diet prior to birth (CO,OC). Feeding a cafeteria diet based on 40 different foods, was associated with a sustained period of elevated energy intake before birth and during lactation (up to 1.7-fold), through increased sugar, total fat and saturated fat intake, and lower protein consumption. Cafeteria fed dams sustained greater weight than animals fed a control chow diet and greater perirenal adiposity by the end of lactation. Exposure to obesity during pregnancy was associated with lower offspring birth weight and body weight in early-postnatal life. In contrast, exposure during lactation alone reduced offspring weight but increased adiposity in male CO offspring before weaning. This research highlights that exposure to maternal obesity during lactation alone can programme adiposity in a sex specific manner.

Subject terms: Disease model, Obesity

Introduction

A large body of research suggests that environmental insults during early life, such as maternal obesity, are not only associated with health risks for the mother, but also predispose the developing fetus or infant to risk of non-communicable adult diseases including obesity1,2. Adverse health effects for offspring have been identified from studies that have attempted to understand developmental programming mechanisms using small animal models of maternal obesity, through the feeding of high-fat diets from the pre-pregnancy period3,4 or at the start of pregnancy, through to the end of lactation5,6. Exposure to these diets can lead to remodelling and permanent changes in key offspring organs such as adipose tissue, but these effects are dependent on the composition of the obesogenic diet and the duration and timing of exposure to it, as well as offspring sex and interactions within their postnatal environment7,8.

The mechanisms of programming are not fully understood, not least during which early-life windows the developing offspring are more sensitive9. The critical developmental window that increases the risk of obesity can be identified through cross-fostering, in which offspring are removed from their birth dam and given to a different dam during suckling. This separates the effects of the prenatal and postnatal environment on offspring health10. Cross-fostering studies have already been used to tease apart the adverse metabolic health consequences in offspring exposed to maternal overnutrition before birth11–13 and during lactation11,13–15. However, the diets used are often high in specific fatty acids and/or sugar, and therefore do not represent the large variation in human overnutrition, or focus specifically on the impact of maternal obesity per se. This makes it difficult to identify whether the observed effects are attributed to specific nutrients or maternal obesity. Maternal obesity rather than the diet itself has been demonstrated to be important for programming of offspring adiposity16. In addition, exclusively pre-feeding a maternal cafeteria diet to induce maternal obesity in rodent dams before mating, exerted independent effects on offspring growth and metabolic health in adulthood17. A cafeteria diet, which ensures a large variety of foods are supplied to induce obesity, gives a better insight into the effects of a maternal obesogenic environment on development18,19. The cafeteria diet promotes overfeeding in animal models, because animals have free access to novel, varied and highly palatable and energetically dense human foods, along with standard chow and water20,21. This provides an important stimulus for the promotion of hyperphagia in rat dams, leading to obesity during pregnancy and lactation22.

Exposure to maternal obesity during early pre and postnatal life via cafeteria feeding has the potential to influence offspring birth weight, growth, body composition, and adiposity in offspring with sex-specific effects17,23. One of the main advantages of the cafeteria diet is the variation in foods provided to animals, inducing a sustained overfed state. Previous studies that have used cafeteria diets during pregnancy and lactation have shown limitations in the range of food items provided, varying from six24, eight22, twelve17 and seventeen food items25. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish a more comprehensive and varied cafeteria diet to consider the relative contributions of maternal obesity during pregnancy and lactation on offspring growth and adiposity, using a cross-fostering animal trial design.

Results

Maternal weight and food intake

During the first 6 weeks of maternal cafeteria feeding there was no significant variation in weight between rats on their respective diets (Fig. 1). However, from 6–13 weeks on the diet cafeteria fed rats were significantly heavier than control dams. Cafeteria fed rats gained an extra 22% in weight during the pre-pregnancy period compared to controls (O, 205.97 ± 7.57 g versus C, 168.29 ± 4.06 g and significantly greater weight gain was also seen during pregnancy (O, 204.11 ± 3.46 g versus C, 168.28 ± 3.67 g). During weeks 12–14 of lactation the cafeteria fed dams lost weight (−35.01 g ± 6.53 g) compared to weight gain in control dams (31.43 ± 4.43 g). Despite the weight loss, cafeteria fed dams still remained heavier than animals fed a chow diet at mid-lactation (week 13 of the study).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Maternal weight during pre-mating, pregnancy and lactation. Values are for mean and SEM. Animals were fed either a control diet (C, open circles, n 13) or a cafeteria diet (O, closed circles, n 12). Pre-mating (weeks 0–8), pregnancy (weeks 8–11), lactation (weeks 11–14). Weight gain at week 12 was calculated from the initial lactation weight of female dams after birth. Some animals were excluded from the analysis due to assessment of extreme outliers or data missing. Statistical analysis was by repeated measures ANOVA.

Food intake measurements during pre-pregnancy, pregnancy and lactation (Fig. 2) identified that the free choice of foods provided to cafeteria fed dams resulted in them consuming up to 1.6 times greater total food mass and 1.7 times greater energy, over 2 times more salt, 4 times more sugar and fat and 12 times more saturated fat than control dams. Total carbohydrate intake was also significantly higher in cafeteria fed animals, but only up to the end of pregnancy, whereas during lactation intake was higher in chow fed animals. Animals fed the control chow diet demonstrated greater intakes of protein and fibre during the entire phase of feeding. The variation in macronutrient intake reflected the food selections made by the animals, rather than being a factor incorporated into the study design.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Maternal nutrient intakes. Values are for mean and SEM. Effect of maternal diet on intakes of: (a) energy, (b) protein, (c) carbohydrate, (d) sugar, (e) fat, (f) saturated fat, (g) fibre, (h) salt, (i) total food. Pre-mating (weeks 0–8), pregnancy weeks (8–11), lactation (weeks 11–14). Animals were fed either a control diet (C, open circles n 14–16) or a cafeteria diet (O, closed circles, n 13–16). Food intakes are shown for total intake of animals pair housed during pre-mating and single-housed during pregnancy and lactation. Pair and single housed data is separated by the dashed line at week 8. Some animals were excluded from the analysis due to assessment of extreme outliers or data missing. Statistical analysis was by repeated measures ANOVA.

Despite evidence of weight loss in cafeteria fed dams during the lactation period, measurement of perirenal fat mass in the dams at the end of this period demonstrated that they retained 3.4 times greater adiposity, whether expressed as fat per body weight (Fig. 3), or in absolute terms (O 6.43 ± 1.75 g versus C 1.85 ± 0.74 g, P < 0.001).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Maternal perirenal adiposity at the end of lactation. Values are for mean and SEM. Animals were fed either a control diet (C, n 12) or a cafeteria diet (O, n 10). Some animals were excluded from the analysis due to assessment of extreme outliers or data missing. *Effect of maternal diet on maternal perirenal adiposity using an independent samples T-test (P < 0.001).

Offspring birth outcomes, weight and adiposity

There was no significant effect of maternal cafeteria diet on offspring litter size, with the mean number of males (C n 8 ± 1, O n 9 ± 1) and females (C n 6 ± 1, O n 7 ± 1) varying little between groups. Exposure to maternal obesity during pregnancy was associated with a significant 13% reduction in offspring birth weights for both males and females, compared to offspring from control fed dams (P < 0.05; Fig. 4). In both male and female offspring, exposure to a cafeteria diet during pregnancy and or lactation (CO, OC, and OO) was associated with lower weight than CC at 1 and 2 weeks of age (P < 0.05). Interestingly in females only, although there was no difference in birthweight between all cafeteria exposed offspring, OC weighed greater than OO offspring at 1 and 2 weeks of age, suggesting a slower growth rate in OO offspring (Fig. 5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Offspring birth weight and litter size. Values are for mean and SEM. (a) Male birth weights, (b) female birth weights calculated as the mean per litter, (c) male offspring litter size at birth, (d) female offspring litter size at birth. Two groups of offspring were studied: offspring exposed to a chow diet during pregnancy (C, n 30) or offspring exposed to a cafeteria diet (O, n 28). Some animals were excluded from the analysis due to assessment of extreme outliers or data missing. *Effect of maternal pregnancy diet on offspring birth weight using an independent samples T-test for males and females separately (P < 0.05). Maternal dietary exposure had no significant effect on the number of offspring per litter for males or females.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Offspring weekly weights pre-weaning. Values are for are mean and SEM. (a) Male offspring, (b) Female offspring. Four groups of cross-fostered offspring were studied: offspring exposed to a chow diet during pregnancy cross-fostered to a chow fed dam during lactation (CC, n 16) or a cafteria fed dam (CO, n 16), offspring exposed to a cafeteria diet during pregnancy cross-fostered to a chow fed dam during lactation (OC, n 16) or a cafeteria fed dam (OO, n 12). Some animals were excluded from the analysis due to assessment of extreme outliers or data missing. Effect of maternal diet vs time on weekly weight of the offspring was determined through repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests. In male offspring, effect of time (P < 0.001), Diet*time (P = 0.001) and post hoc test revealed CO, OC and OO to be significantly lighter than CC. In female offspring, effect of time (P < 0.001), Diet* time (P = 0.001), post hoc analysis identified CO, OC and OO to be significantly lighter than CC, and OC to be significantly higher than OO. Different superscript letters signify significant differences at the P < 0.05 level.

Analysis of offspring adiposity was initially by 3 way-ANOVA, with pregnancy diet, lactation diet and sex as factors. As sex was identified to have a significant effect Two-way ANOVA was subsequently used for males and females separately as seen in Table 1. This revealed male offspring exposed to maternal obesity during pregnancy (OO, OC) had less perirenal adipose tissue at 2 weeks of age (P = 0.005), whereas male CO offspring had 40% greater perirenal fat mass than CC offspring (P = 0.043). In contrast, the level of gonadal fat was unaffected by dietary treatment in male offspring. Female offspring had less fat at both sites than males (P < 0.05), and neither depot showed any response to maternal obesity or diet.

Table 1.

Offspring adipose tissue mass at 2 weeks of age.

Gender Group Perirenal fat mass (% body weight) Gonadal fat mass (% body weight)
Mean SEM Mean SEM
Male CC 0.30 0.02 0.15 0.01
CO b0.42 0.04 0.14 0.01
OC a0.28 0.02 0.13 0.01
OO a0.29 0.02 0.15 0.02
Female CC 0.21 0.03 0.15 0.02
CO 0.26 0.02 0.23 0.03
OC 0.20 0.02 0.14 0.02
OO 0.18 0.05 0.16 0.01
Open in a new tab

Values are for mean and SEM. Four groups of cross-fostered offspring were studied: offspring exposed to a chow diet during pregnancy cross-fostered to a chow fed dam during lactation (CC, n 15–16) or a cafteria fed dam (CO, n 12–16), offspring exposed to a cafeteria diet during pregnancy cross-fostered to a chow fed dam during lactation (OC, n 16) or a cafeteria fed dam (OO, n 9–12). Some animals were excluded from the analysis due to assessment of extreme outliers or data missing.

aEffect of maternal pregnancy diet on offspring perirenal adiposity using two-way ANOVA (males only) (P = 0.005).

bInteraction effect of maternal pregnancy and maternal lactation diet on offspring perirenal adiposity using two-way ANOVA (males only) (P = 0.043).

Discussion

The current study was successful in identifying the relative contributions of maternal obesity during pregnancy and lactation on offspring growth and adiposity, by utilising a highly varied and palatable cafeteria diet to induce maternal obesity, rather than feeding diets high in specific fatty acids or sugars11–15 during critical periods of development. The greater range of novel foods used in this study produced a more prolonged impact on food intake and adiposity than previous cafeteria diet protocols17,18.The data suggests that exposure to maternal obesity during the suckling period had a greater influence on male offspring adiposity pre-weaning (CO versus CC).

Maternal nutritional intakes of the cafeteria diet were relatively comparable to previous studies that also selected a cafeteria diet to induce maternal obesity, including higher intakes of energy, fat, and lower intakes of protein17,22,25. However, the present study used a cafeteria diet that comprised of 40 highly palatable energy-dense human food items providing one of the most varied diets ever reported for a rodent study. Previous studies that have used fewer food items have reported less maternal weight gain and sustained nutrient intakes in cafeteria fed dams17,18, or have reported no significant differences in body weights of control or cafeteria fed dams26. The cafeteria diet in this study was successful at inducing maternal obesity, evidenced by maintained interest through consistently greater intakes of high energy food, leading to sustained hyperphagia and greater weight gain, and over 3 times greater perirenal adiposity at the end of lactation compared to control fed dams. This was an important observation as it has been demonstrated that maternal obesity, rather than the maternal diet, is necessary for programming of offspring obesity and metabolism16,17. Although maternal weight and maternal perirenal adiposity at the end of lactation were the only measures of maternal obesity, female dams fed a cafeteria diet have been shown to have greater total body adiposity during both early and late pregnancy18,25. Animals remained obese up to the end of lactation, despite weight loss during this time. Weight loss during lactation could be due to increased fat deposition during pregnancy to provide greater energy reserves for maintaining metabolic demand during lactation27, or it could be that weight loss was due to mobilisation of lean mass25, which would require future investigation.

Offspring born to cafeteria fed dams exhibited significantly lower birth weights when compared to offspring of control dams. Exposure to a maternal cafeteria diet has been shown to reduce fetal weight of offspring at day 20 of pregnancy, which was dependent on the pre-pregnancy maternal cafeteria diet and therefore maternal obesity rather than the cafeteria diet itself18. Reduced fetal and placental weight25 and birth weight22,26,28 have been demonstrated in other studies that used a cafeteria diet as a model of maternal obesity. Together, these data suggest that maternal obesity in rodents leads to intrauterine growth restriction and reduced birth weight in offspring, although some studies have indicated no differences between birth weight of offspring29 or increased birth weight17,30. In humans, maternal obesity is mainly associated with infants that are large-for-gestational age31,32. Therefore, it appears that variations exist between species, and is dependent on the timing and type of exposure to maternal overnutrition.

Exposure to maternal obesity was associated with lower offspring weights during early postnatal life, possibly due to a failure to catch up from lower birthweight. However exposure during suckling appeared to have an additive effect as OO offspring were lightest, consistent with findings by Vithayathil et al.28, who used a similar trial protocol. This is counter-intuitive as the excess energy intake of the dams may be expected to result in enriched milk (energy from fat), stimulating greater growth. Reduced weight at birth up to 2 weeks of age could be associated with the low protein composition of the cafeteria diet, or a reduction in micronutrient intakes. Exposure to maternal low protein diets during early life is associated with programming of offspring growth and adiposity33. However, it has been shown that the milk protein content in stomachs of offspring at birth did not differ between those exposed to a maternal cafeteria diet or control chow diet during pregnancy, nor did the protein in the milk of lactating cafeteria fed dams differ from control fed dams34. Instead, altered concentrations of fatty acids that can influence development were found in offspring exposed to a cafeteria diet, including higher levels of monounsaturated and trans fatty acids, as well as lower n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids34. In addition, maternal obesity, rather than the cafeteria diet itself, has been associated with lower offspring weights throughout life17. The suggestion that the effect of diet on health does not arise from a single nutrient, but a combination of nutrients working in synergy is why the focus on dietary patterns is more advantageous when looking at diet disease relationships35. A varied cafeteria diet high in saturated fats, sugar, and salt, may have a combined effect on offspring health, given that feeding dams these individual nutrients during pregnancy and lactation is associated with altered offspring physiology and metabolism36–38.

Male offspring exposed to maternal obesity during lactation alone demonstrated elevated perirenal adiposity at 2 weeks of age, despite lighter body weights. Postnatal exposure to maternal high-fat feeding has previously been reported to influence male and female offspring visceral adiposity and growth during the early stages of life, before weaning, but this effect was lost post-weaning14,28. The opposite effect was seen in male offspring exposed to maternal obesity before birth as well (OO), suggesting that they could be biologically prepared for an adverse maternal environment that may give them an adaptive advantage39. Interestingly, these effects were not seen in female offspring or in the gonadal adipose depots. It is known that exposure to maternal obesity during lactation can programme for depot and sex-specific effects on adipose tissue development40. Future research would be required to understand the mechanisms behind this, such as interaction with nutritional signals and sex-hormones41, or epigenetic modifications42.

There are strong associations between reduced weight at birth and during early-life and rapid catch up growth and disease in adult life, including obesity and insulin resistance, in humans43,44 and rats45. It is becoming increasingly clear that such patterns of growth are as strongly associated with maternal overnutrition as with undernutrition. The present study highlights that exposure to maternal obesity impairs fetal growth in the rat, and that obesity and a cafeteria diet during suckling increases pre-weaning adiposity in male, but not female offspring. This study has demonstrated a robust and novel protocol for inducing prolonged overfeeding in rats which can be used to examine the separate influences of obesity in pregnancy and lactation. The presence of sex-specific effects is intriguing as they precede pubertal changes in body composition and suggest that the perinatal period is a time when preadipocyte development is under the influence of sex-related factors and maternal diet, adiposity and possibly endocrine signalling. There are some unanswered questions that would warrant future investigation, including analysis of the milk composition of lactating cafeteria dams. This study has provided a strong demonstration that maternal obesity drives differential effects in pregnancy and lactation, which are likely to have long-term impacts on offspring health and wellbeing.

Methods

Animal procedures

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 under Home Office licence and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Nottingham, UK. Animals were subjected to a controlled 12-hour light, 12-hour dark cycle, in conditions at 20–22 °C and 45% humidity. They were housed in plastic cages with environmental enrichment and had ad libitum access to food and water. Virgin female Wistar rats (Charles River, UK), four weeks old (approximately 95 g; n 32) were randomly allocated to be fed either a control chow diet (C; n 16) (Teklad Global 18% Rodent Diet, Harlan, Belton, now Envigo) or a cafeteria diet (O; n 16). The cafeteria diet consisted of 40 different highly palatable, energy-rich human foods, accompanied by laboratory chow. Four foods in excess quantities ( > 10 g) were randomly provided daily to each animal in a bowl on the cage floor. To maintain variety, two food items were replaced daily, so animals did not receive the same items for more than two consecutive days. The list of cafeteria diet food items with nutritional information is listed in Supplementary Table S1. Animal weights and food intake were measured daily and nutritional intakes (energy, fat, saturated fat, total carbohydrate, sugar, fibre, salt and protein) were calculated as weekly intakes, based on manufacturer’s data. Animals were fed their respective diets for 8 weeks prior to mating through pregnancy and during lactation. In the pre-mating period, animals were pair housed. At mating, all rats were housed with Wistar stud males and mating confirmed by the appearance of a semen plug. Animals were then singly housed and remained on their respective diets throughout pregnancy and lactation. Dams were weighed after birth for calculation of weight gain/loss the following week.

Cross-fostering and offspring weights

All offspring were cross-fostered within 96 hours of birth. Four groups of cross-fostered offspring were generated: offspring exposed to a chow diet during pregnancy cross-fostered to a chow-fed dam during lactation (CC; n 64) or a cafeteria-fed dam (CO; n 64), offspring exposed to a cafeteria diet during pregnancy cross-fostered to a chow-fed dam during lactation (OC; n 64) or a cafeteria-fed dam (OO; n 48). Cross-fostering was achieved by removing the dam from their offspring and placing them in a separate cage out of view of the procedure. Using clean gloves to avoid smell of the birth dam, offspring were then removed from the cage. Offspring were weighed, sexed and randomly allocated to be used or culled so that litters consisted of a maximum of 8 pups (4 females and 4 males where possible). Without disturbing the nest, fostered offspring were then positioned in the cage of the foster mother in the same location as offspring removed. Up to 4 litters were cross-fostered at a time because the experiment was staggered so that only 4 female rats were introduced to the protocol per week, this led to only 4 dams giving birth per week. Offspring were observed regularly to ensure acceptance of offspring through the presence of suckling. Offspring were weighed weekly from cross fostering.

Tissue collection

Neonates were culled using cervical dislocation and cessation of the circulation. Dams and older offspring were culled using CO2 asphyxia and cervical dislocation. All tissue collected throughout the study was stored in 1.5 mL tubes that were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen before being stored at −80 °C. Perirenal and gonadal adipose tissue was weighed and collected at 2 weeks of age from one randomly selected male and one randomly selected female pup. Perirenal adipose tissue was collected from culled female dams at the end of lactation. Tissue weights were calculated as a percentage of animal body weight.

Statistical analysis

All data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 22; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data was checked for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality and normality plots. If data was not normally distributed, data was transformed using the appropriate method based on the skewness of the data. For the effect of maternal diet on maternal food intake, maternal weight and offspring weight at 1 and 2 weeks of postnatal age, a repeated measures ANOVA was used. An independent samples T-test was also used to investigate the effect of maternal diet on maternal adiposity and total weight gain during the individual pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, and lactation periods. An independent samples T-test was also performed separately for males and females, to investigate the effect of maternal diet on offspring litter size and offspring birth weight due to sex differences in these outcomes. Due to sex differences between male and female offspring weights at week 1 and 2 and offspring adiposity, as determined by the three-way ANOVA, differences between groups were assessed separately in male and female offspring. A general linear model two-way ANOVA was used to measure the effect of maternal obesity on offspring adiposity (fixed factors were maternal pregnancy diet and maternal lactation diet). To investigate the effect of maternal diet on offspring weight at week 1 and 2, a repeated measures ANOVA was used and a Bonferroni post hoc test used to identify significance between groups. For offspring weights, where there was more than one offspring per litter, means per litter were identified and then statistical analysis was performed with this data. This was calculated from all offspring at birth, and from a litter size of 8 at weeks 1 and 2. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Variable n numbers presented in the results, mean that some animals were excluded from some analyses due to extreme outliers or data missing. Two cafeteria fed dams and their litters were excluded from the trial after pregnancy, one due a pregnancy complication and one due to cannibalism.

Ethical approval and informed consent

This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Nottingham, UK. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 under Home Office licence.

Supplementary information

41598_2019_50448_MOESM1_ESM.docx (31.4KB, docx)

Supplementary Table S1. List of cafeteria diet food items and nutritional information.

41598_2019_50448_MOESM2_ESM.docx (30.9KB, docx)

Supplementary Table 2. Example of a cafeteria diet feeding regime over a 14 week period.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation [grant number FS/14/36/30843]. The authors gratefully acknowledge Zoe Daniel and Sally Wilford for their technical expertise and assistance.

Author Contributions

S.C.L.-E., M.J.E. and G.G. participated in study design. G.G. carried out the study and prepared the manuscript which was revised and approved by S.C.L.-E., M.J.E., S.A.V.D., R.M. and B.C. S.A.V.D., R.M., B.C. and M.J.E. assisted with animal procedures. S.A.V.D. collected and weighed maternal perirenal adipose tissue mass. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-50448-x.

References

  • 1.Poston L. Maternal obesity, gestational weight gain and diet as determinants of offspring long term health. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2012;26:627–639. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2012.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Penfold NC, Ozanne SE. Developmental programming by maternal obesity in 2015: Outcomes, mechanisms, and potential interventions. Horm. Behav. 2015;76:143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Samuelsson AM, et al. Diet-induced obesity in female mice leads to offspring hyperphagia, adiposity, hypertension, and insulin resistance. Hypertension. 2008;51:383–392. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nivoit P, et al. Established diet-induced obesity in female rats leads to offspring hyperphagia, adiposity and insulin resistance. Diabetologia. 2009;52:1133–1142. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1316-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ashino NG, et al. Maternal high-fat feeding through pregnancy and lactation predisposes mouse offspring to molecular insulin resistance and fatty liver. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2012;23:341–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Volpato AM, et al. Maternal high-fat diet programs for metabolic disturbances in offspring despite leptin sensitivity. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;96:272–284. doi: 10.1159/000336377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li M., Sloboda D. M., Vickers M. H. Maternal Obesity and Developmental Programming of Metabolic Disorders in Offspring: Evidence from Animal Models. Experimental Diabetes Research. 2011;2011:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2011/592408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Langley-Evans SC. Nutrition in early life and the programming of adult disease: a review. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2015;28:1–14. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heindel JJ, et al. Developmental origins of health and disease: integrating environmental influences. Endocrinology. 2016;2016:17–22. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mccarty R. Cross-fostering: Elucidating the effects of gene× environment interactions on phenotypic development. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2017;73:219–254. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Khan IY, et al. A high-fat diet during rat pregnancy or suckling induces cardiovascular dysfunction in adult offspring. American Journal of Physiology, Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2005;288:R127–R133. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00354.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shankar K, et al. Maternal obesity at conception programs obesity in the offspring. American Journal of Physiology, Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2008;294:R528–R538. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00316.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oben JA, et al. Maternal obesity during pregnancy and lactation programs the development of offspring non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Journal of Hepatology. 2010;52:913–920. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sun B, et al. Maternal high-fat diet during gestation or suckling differentially affects offspring leptin sensitivity and obesity. Diabetes. 2012;61:2833–2841. doi: 10.2337/db11-0957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Masuyama H, Hiramatsu Y. Additive effects of maternal high fat diet during lactation on mouse offspring. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.White CL, Purpera MN, Morrison CD. Maternal obesity is necessary for programming effect of high-fat diet on offspring. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2009;296:R1464–R1472. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.91015.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Akyol A, Mcmullen S, Langley-Evans SC. Glucose intolerance associated with early-life exposure to maternal cafeteria feeding is dependent upon post-weaning diet. British Journal of Nutrition. 2012;107:964–978. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511003916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Akyol A, Langley-Evans SS, Mcmullen S. Obesity induced by cafeteria feeding and pregnancy outcome in the rat. British Journal of Nutrition. 2009;102:1601–1610. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509990961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sampey BP, et al. Cafeteria diet is a robust model of human metabolic syndrome with liver and adipose inflammation: comparison to high‐fat diet. Obesity. 2011;19:1109–1117. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ. Regulation of energy balance in two models of reversible obesity in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 1979;93:1024–1034. doi: 10.1037/h0077631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shafat A, Murray B, Rumsey D. Energy density in cafeteria diet induced hyperphagia in the rat. Appetite. 2009;52:34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bayol SA, Farrington SJ, Stickland NC. A maternal ‘junk food’ diet in pregnancy and lactation promotes an exacerbated taste for ‘junk food’ and a greater propensity for obesity in rat offspring. British Journal of Nutrition. 2007;98:843–851. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507812037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bayol SA, Simbi BH, Bertrand JA, Stickland NC. Offspring from mothers fed a ‘junk food’diet in pregnancy and lactation exhibit exacerbated adiposity that is more pronounced in females. The Journal of Physiology. 2008;586:3219–3230. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.153817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gugusheff JR, Vithayathil M, Ong ZY, Muhlhausler BS. The effects of prenatal exposure to a ‘junk food’diet on offspring food preferences and fat deposition can be mitigated by improved nutrition during lactation. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. 2013;4:348–357. doi: 10.1017/S2040174413000330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Crew RC, Waddell BJ, Mark PJ. Maternal obesity induced by a ‘cafeteria’ diet in the rat does not increase inflammation in maternal, placental or fetal tissues in late gestation. Placenta. 2016;39:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gugusheff JR, et al. Sex and age-dependent effects of a maternal junk food diet on the mu-opioid receptor in rat offspring. Behavioural Brain Research. 2016;301:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grattan DR, Ladyman SR, Augustine RA. Hormonal induction of leptin resistance during pregnancy. Physiology & Behavior. 2007;91:366–374. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vithayathil, M.A. et al. Exposure to maternal cafeteria diets during the suckling period has greater effects on fat deposition and Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein-1c (SREBP-1c) gene expression in rodent offspring compared to exposure before birth. Nutrition & Metabolism. 15, 10.1186/s12986-018-0253-3 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Bayol SA, Simbi BH, Stickland NC. A maternal cafeteria diet during gestation and lactation promotes adiposity and impairs skeletal muscle development and metabolism in rat offspring at weaning. The Journal of Physiology. 2005;567:951–961. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.088989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Parente LB, Aguila MB, Mandarim-De-Lacerda CA. Deleterious effects of high-fat diet on perinatal and postweaning periods in adult rat offspring. Clinical Nutrition. 2008;27:623–634. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM, Catalano PM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;191:964–968. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mcintyre HD, Gibbons KS, Flenady VJ, Callaway LK. Overweight and obesity in Australian mothers: epidemic or endemic. Medical Journal of Australia. 2012;196:184–188. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bellinger L, Sculley DV, Langley-Evans SC. Exposure to undernutrition in fetal life determines fat distribution, locomotor activity and food intake in ageing rats. International Journal of Obesity. 2006;30:729–738. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vithayathil MA, Gugusheff JR, Gibson RA, Ong ZY, Muhlhausler BS. Effect of a maternal cafeteria diet on the fatty acid composition of milk and offspring red blood cells. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids (PLEFA). 2016;109:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gerber M. The comprehensive approach to diet: a critical review. The Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:3051S–3055S. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.11.3051S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Siemelink M, Verhoef A, Dormans JAMA, Span P, Piersma A. Dietary fatty acid composition during pregnancy and lactation in the rat programs growth and glucose metabolism in the offspring. Diabetologia. 2002;45:1397–1403. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0918-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gray C, et al. Excess maternal salt intake produces sex-specific hypertension in offspring: putative roles for kidney and gastrointestinal sodium handling. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Samuelsson AM, Matthews PA, Jansen E, Taylor PD, Poston L. Sucrose feeding in mouse pregnancy leads to hypertension, and sex-linked obesity and insulin resistance in female offspring. Frontiers in Physiology. 2013;4:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Armitage JA, Khan IY, Taylor PD, Nathanielsz PW, Poston L. Developmental programming of the metabolic syndrome by maternal nutritional imbalance: how strong is the evidence from experimental models in mammals? The Journal of Physiology. 2004;561:355–377. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.072009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lecoutre S, et al. Depot-and sex-specific effects of maternal obesity in offspring’s adipose tissue. Journal of Endocrinology. 2016;230:39–53. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dearden L, Bouret SG, Ozanne SE. Sex and gender differences in developmental programming of metabolism. Molecular Metabolism. 2018;15:8–19. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lecoutre S, Petrus P, Rydén M, Breton C. Transgenerational epigenetic mechanisms in adipose tissue development. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2018;29:675–685. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2018.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ibáñez L, et al. Early development of visceral fat excess after spontaneous catch-up growth in children with low birth weight. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2008;93:925–928. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Crume TL, et al. The Long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse US cohort of children: The EPOCH study. Obesity. 2014;22:608–615. doi: 10.1002/oby.20565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Berends LM, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Martin-Gronert MS, Cripps RL, Ozanne SE. Catch-up growth following intra-uterine growth-restriction programmes an insulin-resistant phenotype in adipose tissue. International Journal of Obesity. 2013;37:1051–1057. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41598_2019_50448_MOESM1_ESM.docx (31.4KB, docx)

Supplementary Table S1. List of cafeteria diet food items and nutritional information.

41598_2019_50448_MOESM2_ESM.docx (30.9KB, docx)

Supplementary Table 2. Example of a cafeteria diet feeding regime over a 14 week period.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES