Abstract
The factors that cause post-natal growth retardation (PGR) in pigs are complicated; however, metabolic and immune system impairment seem to be involved. The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes of blood parameters, hormone profiles, antioxidant capacity, and immune responses in PGR pigs. Blood and small intestinal mucosa samples were collected from 42-days-old PGR and healthy pigs. The results showed that compared with the healthy group, the relative weight of spleen and kidney were greater, but the liver was lighter in PGR pigs (P < 0.05). The PGR pigs had increased serum alanine transaminase, urea nitrogen, blood ammonia, IgG, and complement 4, but decreased glucose and albumin (P < 0.05). The higher levels of serum leptin (LEP) and thyroxin (T4), and the lower levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), somatostatin (SS), and agouti gene-related protein (AgRP) were observed in PGR pigs (P < 0.05). Consistent with the serum levels of hormones, the mRNA levels of gut hormones and their receptors were also altered in intestinal mucosa from PGR pigs (P < 0.05). The PGR pigs exhibited higher plasma concentrations of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-8, and transformed growth factor beta (TGFβ) (P < 0.05). However, the mRNA expressions of several cytokines were lower in the small intestinal mucosa of PGR pigs (P < 0.05). Abnormal antioxidant indexes in serum of PGR pigs were observed, which was in accordance with the reduced mRNA expression of several anti-oxidative genes in the small intestinal mucosa of PGR pigs (P < 0.05). These data demonstrate that an abnormal gut hormone system, immune dysfunction, and decreased antioxidant capacity may contribute to PGR in pigs. These changes could provide a valuable target in the regulation of post-natal growth retardation in animals and humans.
Keywords: post-natal growth retardation, hormone secretion, appetite, immune response, antioxidant capacity, blood parameters
Introduction
Post-natal growth retardation (PGR) piglet refers to a piglet that has failed to achieve its genetically determined growth potential (1). PGR is associated with lifelong consequences beyond reduced weight, including metabolic disturbance and impaired immune function (2). The intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) pigs also exhibit lower diversity and different taxonomic abundances of gut microbiota (3). Although possible causes of PGR have been discussed, such as placental insufficiency (4), pathogen burden (5), gut mucosal barrier dysfunction (6), parental genetic disruption (7), and abnormal maternal lactocrine programming (8), the question remains largely unsolved as to the assessment of the common markers between PGR pigs and pigs with normal growth. It is important to seek the possible intervening targets to enhance growth in poorly performing piglets, ensuring a good growth rate post-weaning (9, 10).
Blood profiles, such as acute-phase proteins, have been used to assess the herd health, immune status, and growth potential in pigs (11, 12). Marked differences are observed in serum glucose concentration between growth-retarded children and healthy children, and some types of amino acids are significantly reduced in fetal growth restriction children (13). The levels of multiple hormones, such as growth hormone (GH), thyroxin (T4), and leptin (LEP) were also altered in IUGR children and piglets (14, 15). These anabolic hormones play important roles in many biological activities including cell survival, organ maturation, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant (16, 17). Insulin sensitivity in IUGR pigs can be improved with dietary methionine restriction (18). Therefore, the disturbance of their secretion or function during post-natal development in PGR induces long-term changes in tissue growth and function, with persistent detrimental effects (15). IUGR pigs were also reported to have impaired antioxidant capacity and disorder of the immune system (19, 20). The increased serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) reflects the severe inflammatory response in pigs (21, 22).
Therefore, we hypothesized that changes of blood profiles, abnormal gut hormone secretion, immune dysfunction, and decreased antioxidant capacity may contribute to PGR in pigs. The present study was conducted to compare the differences in blood parameters, gut hormone profiles, antioxidant capacity, and immune responses between PGR pigs and healthy pigs, which could provide a valuable target in the regulation of PGR in animals and humans.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Experimental Design
This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All experimental protocols were approved by the animal ethical committee of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2013020).
Duroc × Landrace × Large Yorkshire crossbred pigs with the same paternal origin weaned at 21 days of age were used in the present study. All pigs were housed in pens with hard plastic slatted flooring and had 24 h ad libitum access to feed and water. The room temperature was kept at 26 ± 1 °C, and the humidity was controlled between 50 and 60%. Pigs were fed the same commercial feeds which were formulated according to the recommended nutrient requirements of National Research Council (2012) (23). At 42 d of age, six PGR pigs (BW 5.40 ± 0.38 kg) and six healthy pigs (Control) (BW 11.01 ± 0.40 kg) pair-matched by litter were selected for sampling. Pigs with a BW of <70% of average BW were regarded as PGR, and there were no obvious characteristics of the disease or injury. After overnight fasting, blood samples were obtained from the jugular vein in the morning (18). Approximately 10 mL of blood from the jugular vein was collected in aseptic capped tubes containing 150 U of sodium heparin, and another 10 mL of blood were routinely collected. Serum and plasma samples were obtained by centrifugation at 2,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. These samples were immediately stored at −80°C for analyses of biochemical profile, antioxidant capacity, hormone profiles, and cytokine production. All pigs were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (20 mg/kg BW) and killed by jugular puncture. The liver, kidney, spleen, heart, and lung were obtained and weighed. The relative weight of each organ was calculated as the organ weight divided by the BW (g/kg). Samples of the jejunal and ileal mucosa were scraped and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for RNA extraction.
Serum Biochemical Indexes Assays
Immunoglobulins (IgG and IgM), as well as biochemical indicators (total protein, albumin, etc.) were measured using an instrument (Biochemical Analytical Instrument, Beckman CX4, Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA) and commercial kits (Sino-German Beijing Leadman Biotech Ltd., Beijing, China).
Determination of Serum Hormone
Serum concentrations of GH, T4, LEP, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), somatostatin (SS), insulin (INS), insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), agouti gene-related protein (AgRP), and proopiomelanocortin (POMC) were determined using ELISA kits in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Meimian industrial Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China).
Determination of Plasma Cytokines
Plasma concentrations of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), transformed growth factor beta (TGFβ), and interferon gamma (IFNγ) were measured using commercially available swine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits according to the manufacturer's instructions (Meimian industrial Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China).
Serum Antioxidant Capacity
The serum antioxidant indices, including glutathione peroxide (GSH-PX), glutathione S-Transferases (GST), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO) content, and total nitric oxide synthase (TNOS) were measured using commercial kits (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the liquid nitrogen-pulverized intestinal mucosa samples with the TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and quantified by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel with the measurement of optical density at 260 and 280 nm. Synthesis of the first strand (cDNA) was performed with 5 × PrimeScript Buffer2 and PrimeScript reverse transcriptase Enzyme Mix 1 (Takara Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd, Dalian, China). Primers were designed with Primer 5.0 (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) according to the gene sequence of the pig to produce an amplification product, as described previously (24). The primers used to amplify genes are shown in Table 1. β-actin was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize target gene transcript levels (21). The resulting cDNA was diluted and used as a PCR template to evaluate gene expression. The reaction was performed in a volume of 10 μL (LightCycler® 480 Real-Time PCR System, Roche, Switzerland). 1 μL cDNA template was added to a total volume of 10 μL containing 5 μL SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Dalian, China), 3.2 μl distilled H2O, and 0.4 μmol/L each of forward and reverse primer. Reactions were incubated in a 384-well optical plate (Roche, Switzerland). We used the following protocol: (i) predenaturation program (30 s at 95°C), (ii) amplification and quantification program repeated 40 cycles (5 s at 95°C and 20 s at 60°C for annealing), and (iii) melting curve program (60–95°C with a heating rate of 0.1°C per second and fluorescence measurement). All samples were tested in triplicate. The relative expression levels of the selected genes normalized against the reference gene (β-actin) were calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCt method (25). No expression changes of β-actin were observed in the intestinal mucosa among the two groups (data not shown). Data are expressed as the relative values to those for healthy pigs.
Table 1.
Primers used for quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.
| Gene | Gene Bank No. | Sequence (5′-3′) | Product length, bp |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-actin | XM_0031242803 | F:CTGCGGCATCCACGAAACT | 147 |
| R:AGGGCCGTGATCTCCTTCTG | |||
| IL-1β | NM_214055.1 | F:CAGCCATGGCCATAGTACCT | 216 |
| R:CCACGATGACAGACACCATC | |||
| IL-4 | NM_214340.1 | F:CCCGAGTGTCAAGTGGCTTA | 122 |
| R:TGATGATGCCGAAATAGCAG | |||
| IL-6 | NM_001252429.1 | F:GGCAAAAGGGAAAGAATCCAG | 87 |
| R:CGTTCTGTGACTGCAGCTTATCC | |||
| IL-8 | NM_213867.1 | F:GCTCTCTGTGAGGCTGCAGTTC | 79 |
| R:AAGGTGTGGAATGCGTATTTATGC | |||
| IL-10 | NM_214041.1 | F:GGGCTATTTGTCCTGACTGC | 105 |
| R:GGGCTCCCTAGTTTCTCTTCC | |||
| IFNγ | NM_213948.1 | F:TTCAGCTTTGCGTGACTTTG | 121 |
| R:GGTCCACCATTAGGTACATCTG | |||
| TLR4 | NM_001113039.1 | F:CAGATAAGCGAGGCCGTCATT | 113 |
| R:TTGCAGCCCACAAAAAGCA | |||
| MyD88 | NM_001099923 | F:GTGCCGTCGGATGGTAGTG | 65 |
| R:TCTGGAAGTCACATTCCTTGCTT | |||
| Nrf2 | XM_005671981.3 | F:CACCACCTCAGGGTAATA | 125 |
| R:GCGGCTTGAATGTTTGTC | |||
| HO-1 | NM_001004027.1 | F:AGCTGTTTCTGAGCCTCCAA | 130 |
| R:CAAGACGGAAACACGAGACA | |||
| NQO1 | NM_001159613.1 | F:CCAGCAGCCCGGCCAATCTG | 160 |
| R:AGGTCCGACACGGCGACCTC | |||
| Akt | NM_001159776.1 | F:TGTGGCAGGATGTGTATGAGA | 188 |
| R:GTAGGAGAACTGGGGGAAGTG | |||
| mTOR | XM_003127584.6 | F:TTGTTGCCCCCTATTGTGAAG | 61 |
| R:CCTTTCGAGATGGCAATGGA | |||
| 4EBP1 | NM_001244225.1 | F:CCGGAAGTTCCTAATGGAGTGT | 125 |
| R:GGTTCTGGCTGGCATCTGT | |||
| P70S6K | XM_003131671.5 | F:GGAAACAAGTGGAATAGAGCAGATG | 65 |
| R:TTGGAAGTGGTGCAGAAGCTT | |||
| GHRL | NM_213807.2 | F: CAAGAAGCCAGCAGCCAAAC | 290 |
| R: GAAGCCAGGTGAGCCCTTAG | |||
| AgRP | NM_001011693.1 | F: GCAGGCCGAGGCCAA | 57 |
| R: CGTGCCTTGCGTCCTTC | |||
| SS | NM_001009583.1 | F: CTCTCCATCGTCCTGGCTCT | 159 |
| R: GTTCTCTGTCTGGTTGGGTTCAG | |||
| IGF-1 | NM_214256.1 | F: GACGCTCTTCAGTTCGTGTG | 141 |
| R: CTCCAGCCTCCTCAGATCAC | |||
| IGF-1R | NM_214172.1 | F: CAGTCCTAGCACCTCCAAGC | 134 |
| R: GTCTTCGGCCACCATACAGT | |||
| GHR | NM_214254.2 | F: TTCACCAAGTGCCGTTCA | 154 |
| R: AATCAGGGCACTCTTTC | |||
| INSR | XM_021083940.1 | F: GGCATGGTGTACGAGGGAAA | 124 |
| R: AGGCCTCGTTGAGAAACTCG | |||
| SERT | XM_021067520.1 | F: GGCTTGGAGGGGGTGATCA | 60 |
| R: GCGCTTGGACCAGAAGT | |||
| 5-HTR4 | NM_001001267.1 | F: ACAGGAACAAGATGACCCCT | 277 |
| R: AGGAGGAACGGGATGTAGAA | |||
| CCK | NM_214237.2 | F: GGCCAGATACATCCAGCAG | 122 |
| R: AATCCATCCAGCCCATGTAG | |||
| GLP-1R | NM_001256594.1 | F: CACAGGCTTGTTCTGCAACC | 414 |
| R: AAGACGGACAGTGCTCGAAG |
Statistical Analyses
All statistical analyses were performed by the independent sample t-test using SPSS software 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P-values < 0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance.
Results
BW and Relative Weight of Visceral Organs
As shown in Table 2, the average BW of PGR was significantly lighter than that of age-matched healthy pigs (P < 0.01). Absolute weight of all organ samples was significantly lower for PGR pigs compared to healthy pigs (P < 0.01). Compared with healthy pigs, the relative weights of the spleen and kidney were increased but the relative weight of the liver was decreased in PGR pigs (P < 0.05).
Table 2.
The body weight and viscera weights of healthy (Control) and post-natal growth retardation (PGR) pigs (n = 6)a.
| Item | Control | PGR | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW, kg | 11.01 | 5.40 | 0.57 | <0.01 |
| Heart | ||||
| Weight, g | 54.62 | 27.26 | 3.40 | <0.01 |
| Relative weight, g/kg | 4.95 | 5.24 | 0.23 | 0.257 |
| Liver | ||||
| Weight, g | 328.61 | 122.16 | 15.12 | <0.01 |
| Relative weight, g/kg | 29.92 | 23.71 | 1.72 | <0.01 |
| Spleen | ||||
| Weight, g | 22.67 | 14.00 | 2.48 | <0.01 |
| Relative weight, g/kg | 2.05 | 2.60 | 0.19 | 0.015 |
| Lung | ||||
| Weight, g | 160.54 | 90.09 | 3.78 | <0.01 |
| Relative weight, g/kg | 14.69 | 17.18 | 1.53 | 0.136 |
| Kidney | ||||
| Weight, g | 66.58 | 35.96 | 4.18 | <0.01 |
| Relative weight, g/kg | 5.78 | 6.92 | 0.39 | 0.016 |
BW, body weight. The relative weights of viscera were calculated as the organ weight divided by BW (g/kg).
Serum Biochemical Indexes
The serum concentrations of IgG and complement 4 (C4) were higher in PGR pigs as compared to healthy pigs (P < 0.05). An increase in serum concentrations of alanine transaminase, blood urea nitrogen, and blood ammonia but a decrease in albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and glucose were observed in PGR pigs (P < 0.05). There were no differences in total protein, aspartate aminotransferase, lactic dehydrogenase, and lactate between the two groups (P > 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Serum biochemical indexes in healthy (Control) and post-natal growth retardation (PGR) pigs (n = 6).
| Item | Control | PGR | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgG, g/L | 1.14 | 1.83 | 0.22 | 0.011 |
| IgM, g/L | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.09 | 0.787 |
| Complement 3, mg/L | 20.00 | 20.00 | 5.00 | 0.515 |
| Complement 4, mg/L | 20.00 | 30.00 | 3.00 | 0.011 |
| Total protein, g/L | 49.70 | 48.98 | 1.40 | 0.617 |
| Albumin, g/L | 27.50 | 21.94 | 1.33 | 0.002 |
| Alkaline phosphatase, U/L | 357.80 | 107.20 | 26.83 | <0.01 |
| Alanine transaminase, U/L | 36.27 | 58.06 | 4.21 | <0.01 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase, U/L | 52.60 | 80.00 | 13.36 | 0.067 |
| Lactic dehydrogenase, U/L | 803.00 | 859.50 | 38.20 | 0.170 |
| Glucose, mmol/L | 6.18 | 4.50 | 0.49 | 0.006 |
| Blood urea nitrogen, mmol/L | 2.02 | 2.32 | 0.10 | 0.014 |
| Blood ammonia, μmol/L | 414.98 | 547.13 | 38.51 | 0.006 |
| Lactate, mmol/L | 9.81 | 7.76 | 0.95 | 0.055 |
Hormone Concentration in Serum
As shown in Table 4, the serum concentrations of IGF-1, 5-HT, and AgRP in PGR pigs were significantly lower than those of healthy pigs (P < 0.05). However, PGR significantly increased the levels of LEP, SS, and T4 in serum as compared to healthy pigs (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in serum concentrations of GH, INS, GLP-1, and POMC between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Table 4.
Serum hormone concentrations in healthy (Control) and post-natal growth retardation (PGR) pigs (n = 6).
| Items | Control | PGR | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GH, ng/mL | 18.43 | 21.53 | 2.06 | 0.163 |
| IGF-1, ng/mL | 91.14 | 81.77 | 2.87 | <0.01 |
| 5-HT, pg/mL | 1,630.72 | 1,312.29 | 121.49 | 0.026 |
| LEP, ng/mL | 12.31 | 14.64 | 1.00 | 0.042 |
| INS, mIU/L | 27.99 | 30.65 | 2.68 | 0.344 |
| T4, pmol/L | 22.52 | 29.12 | 2.43 | 0.022 |
| SS, pg/mL | 55.32 | 73.32 | 6.40 | 0.018 |
| GLP-1, pmol/L | 12.23 | 13.12 | 1.23 | 0.489 |
| AgRP, pg/mL | 2,803.26 | 2,159.39 | 232.78 | 0.020 |
| POMC, ng/mL | 11.82 | 12.66 | 1.54 | 0.596 |
GH, growth hormone; IGF-1, insulin like growth factor-1; 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; LEP, leptin; INS, insulin; T4, thyroxin; SS, somatostatin; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; AgRP, agouti gene-related protein; POMC, proopiomelanocortin.
Plasma Cytokines
Plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-1β, IL-8, and TGFβ were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in PGR pigs in comparison to healthy pigs. And plasma concentrations of IL-10, IL-12, TNFα, and IFNγ were not affected in PGR (P > 0.05) (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Concentrations of plasma cytokines in healthy pigs (Control) and post-natal growth retardation (PGR) pigs. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. n = 6. *P < 0.05 vs. healthy pigs.
Serum Anti-oxidation Index
The serum concentrations of T-AOC, SOD, MDA, GSH-PX, GST, NO, and TNOS are presented in Figure 2. Compared to healthy pigs, the serum concentrations of T-AOC, SOD, GSH-PX, and TNOS were decreased, but the concentration of MDA was significantly increased in PGR pigs (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences in the serum concentrations of GST and NO between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Figure 2.
Serum antioxidant capacity of healthy pigs (Control) and post-natal growth retardation (PGR) pigs. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. n = 6. *P < 0.05 vs. healthy pigs.
Relative mRNA Expression of Intestinal Hormone-, Immune- and Antioxidant-Related Genes
The relative mRNA expression of hormone-related genes is shown in Figure 3; PGR induced decreased mRNA levels of IGF-1, growth hormone receptor (GHR), cholecystokinin (CCK), serotonin transporter (SERT), and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) in jejunal and ileal mucosa as compared to healthy pigs (P < 0.05). Compared to healthy pigs, the relative mRNA levels of insulin like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R), ghrelin (GHRL), and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4 (5-HTR4) were significantly lower in jejunal mucosa than in PGR pigs (P < 0.05), while AgRP and insulin receptor (INSR) were downregulated in ileal mucosa from PGR pigs (P < 0.01). However, PGR significantly increased SS levels in ileal mucosa as compared to healthy pigs (P < 0.01).
Figure 3.
Relative mRNA abundances of hormone-related genes in the jejunal and ileal mucosa of healthy pigs (Control) and post-natal growth retardation (PGR) pigs. Data are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 6. *P < 0.05 vs. healthy pigs; **P < 0.01 vs. healthy pigs.
As shown in Figure 4, the relative mRNA expressions of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFNγ, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), and myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) in the jejunal mucosa and IL-10 and IFNγ in the ileal mucosa were downregulated in PGR compared to those of healthy pigs (P < 0.05).
Figure 4.
Relative mRNA abundances of cytokines in the jejunal and ileal mucosa of healthy pigs (Control) and post-natal growth retardation (PGR) pigs. Data are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 6. *P < 0.05 vs. healthy pigs.
In the jejunal mucosa, the relative mRNA expressions of nuclear factor like-2 (Nrf2), heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), NAD (P) H dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1), mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1) and ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta-1 (P70S6K) were significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in PGR pigs compared to healthy pigs. In the ileal mucosa, PGR pigs showed lower expressions of serine-threonine protein kinase (Akt), mTOR, 4EBP1, P70S6K, and NQO1 mRNA than in healthy pigs (P < 0.05) (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Relative mRNA abundances of antioxidant related genes and mTOR signaling pathway in the jejunal and ileal mucosa of healthy pigs (Control) and post-natal growth retardation (PGR) pigs. Data are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 6. *P < 0.05 vs. healthy pigs.
Discussion
PGR, which causes reducing efficiency of feed utilization and increasing mortality (26), is common in the pig industry. Several studies have demonstrated that PGR exhibited poor growth performance compared with their heavier counterparts (2, 27). And it has been shown that PGR could lead to allometric growth of individual organs (28). The changes of relative weights of the liver, spleen, and kidney in PGR pigs were consistent with reports that the relative weight of the liver was decreased and kidney was increased in the IUGR lamb, and that of the spleen was increased in low birth weight piglets (2, 28). Many studies have shown that reduced relative weight of liver indicated a hepatic proinflammatory signal, and the increased relative weight of the spleen may be associated with high inflammation response, such as increased secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines (29, 30). The injury of organs could be reflected by the changes of serum biochemical indexes, such as the blood urea nitrogen, ammonia, and C4 to some extent (31). Excessive inflammation activation may lead to liver impairment (32). The increased serum alanine transaminase in PGR pigs was proposed to reflect the decreased liver integrity, which agrees with the previous study that severe inflammation caused by lipopolysaccharide injection resulted in higher activity of serum alanine transaminase in mice (33). Additionally, glucose was significantly lower in serum from PGR pigs. Glucose is the primary source of energy for fetal growth, and energy restriction causes predictably growth reduction (28). As for the immunity, the PGR pigs exhibited higher plasma concentrations of IgG and some inflammatory cytokines. Increased serum IgG may indicate toxic or oxidative damage in organisms (34, 35).
The hormones play vital roles in regulation of growth and organ maturation. Shifts in hormone levels and their receptors' activity in PGR may induce persistent impacts on organ development and function (36). It has been reported that IUGR neonates showed the different hormone profile from non-IUGRs (36). In our study, the level of hormones and activity of their receptors were tested, and they—especially the gut hormones, such as 5-HT, LEP—were significantly changed between healthy and PGR pigs. This suggests that gut hormones may be one of the critical factors resulting in PGR. GH is a key factor that regulates growth and metabolism (37). The multifunctional actions of GH are determined by the abundance of GHR (37). No significant difference was observed in GH level between healthy and PGR pigs in our study, but decreased expression of GHR was observed in PGR pigs. This suggests that the abnormal expression of GHR but not the secretion of GH takes effects. In addition, many studies have demonstrated that IGF-1 played important roles during organ development in different animals. For example, the IGF-1 system is associated with neonatal growth in mice (38), liver development in rats (39), mammary maturation in swine (40), and bone remodeling in chickens (41). IGF-1 and GLP-1 also control the gastrointestinal tract development, inhibit the apoptosis of mammalian cells, and enhance anti-inflammatory and antioxidant capabilities (17, 36, 42). In our study, the serum concentration of IGF-1, and the mRNA expression of IGF-1, IGF-1R, and GLP-1R in intestinal mucosa, were decreased in PGR pigs as compared to healthy pigs. This agrees with the previous study that reduced plasma concentration of GLP-1 and the low circulating levels of IGF-1 were observed in IUGR pigs (17, 43). The deficiency in IGF-1 and GLP-1 leads to delayed maturation of intestinal mucosa, such as impaired intestinal barrier function and reduced activity of brush border enzymes, which may be one of the major causative factors in PGR (43, 44). Additionally, the elevated levels of T4 in serum from PGR pigs in our study may lead to increased oxidant production and mitochondrial oxidative damage (45). 5-HT is a vital regulatory factor in the gastrointestinal tract and other organ systems. The gut-derived 5-HT participates in various biological process, including intestinal motility and fluid secretion (46), immune responses (47), and bone development (48). The actions of 5-HT on enteric motor neurons are transduced by 5-HT receptors, such as 5-HT4R, which are majorly expressed in gastrointestinal tissues (49, 50). The SERT determines the final 5-HT availability, and its dysfunction is associated with various gut diseases (51). Our study showed that PGR reduced the serum level of 5-HT and mRNA expression of 5-HT4R and SERT in intestinal mucosa. It is in accordance with the previous reports that altered 5-HT signaling resulted in both intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms in gut disease, for example, the downregulated SERT and 5-HT4R induced functional gut disorders, such as colitis (49, 52, 53). The intestinal hormones including LEP, INS, SS, AgRP, CCK, and GHRL, play important roles in regulating appetite via controlling digestion and satiety (54, 55). The appetite-stimulating effects of AgRP are inhibited by the secretion of LEP and activated by the GHRL (56). CCK mediates digestion by stimulating the activity of digestive enzymes to catalyze the nutrients, which is suppressed by SS secretion (57). In our study, we found elevated levels of LEP and SS but reduced levels of AgRP in serum, and mRNA levels of CCK, INSR, and GHRL in intestinal mucosa in PGR pigs as compared to healthy pigs. This agrees with a previous study that the level of INSR mRNAs tends to be lower in the intestinal mucosa of IUGR piglets compared to pigs with normal weight (58). Inhibited appetite and impaired digestive capability may contribute to PGR. The above findings may well explain the delayed maturation of intestinal mucosa in PGR pigs.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines (including IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8) are necessary to initiate the inflammatory response during infection (59). In this study, the concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TGFβ in plasma were significantly higher in PGR pigs. It was coincident with the previous study that the activated immune response could lead to a high concentration of cytokines in plasma (21). However, the gene expression of several cytokines in the intestinal mucosa was lower in PGR pigs. This reflected the immaturity of the intestinal immune system in PGR pigs, which is consistent with a study that found IUGR piglets had decreased relative mRNA expression of cytokines in the small intestine (60).
Consistent with the impaired immune function of PGR pigs, PGR decreased antioxidant capacity. Oxidative stress may cause piglets' worsening health status and poor growth performance (61). At the cellular level, the exceeded reactive oxidative species (ROS) can lead to widespread damage to DNA, protein, and endogenous lipid (62). The increased concentration of MDA in serum was observed in PGRs, which are similar to the results of a previous study that the concentration of MDA was higher in the liver of IUGR piglets (19). SOD and GSH-PX are the main antioxidant enzymes that can be used to evaluate anti-oxidative capability in piglets, and they remove hydrogen peroxide via oxidizing reduced glutathione to oxidized glutathione (63). In this research, the activity of SOD and GSH-PX were significantly decreased in PGR pigs, which is in accordance with the previous results (2). TNOS and T-AOC reflect the levels of the non-enzymatic antioxidant defense system and antioxidant enzymes. PGR-induced oxidative injury was found to reduce the T-AOC and TNOS activity in serum, which is consistent with the findings of previous research that oxidative stress caused decreased activity of this enzyme (19, 64). In accordance with the lower antioxidant levels in serum from PGR pigs, lower expressions of anti-oxidation related genes including Nrf2, NQO1, and HO-1 were also observed in PGR pigs. We further detected expressions of some critical genes involved in the Akt/mTOR pathway. The results showed that mRNA expressions of Akt, mTOR, 4EBP1, and P70S6k were down-regulated in intestinal mucosa from PGR pigs. This suggests that PGR may induce inhibition of intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and protein synthesis (65). The lower antioxidant capability may be explained by the abnormal mRNA expression of the Akt/mTOR pathway in PGR pigs (66).
In summary, PGR pigs had increased serum alanine transaminase, urea nitrogen, blood ammonia, IgG, and complement 4 but decreased glucose, and albumin. In addition, an impaired gut 5-HT pathway and abnormal secretion of hormones controlling digestion and gut maturation were observed in PGR pigs. Additionally, the PGR pigs exhibited higher plasma concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TGFβ, as well as lower serum T-AOC, SOD, GSH-PX, and TNOS. The mRNA expression of several anti-oxidative genes was also reduced in the small intestinal mucosa of PGR pigs. These results showed that PGR exhibited an abnormal hormone profile, immune dysfunction, and decreased antioxidant capacity, which could help to regulate post-natal growth retardation in animals and humans.
Data Availability Statement
Data is available at NCBI under the accession number GSE136777.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the animal ethical committee of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2013020).
Author Contributions
MQ, BT, and YY designed the experiments. MQ and JW conducted the experiments. SL and JL helped with animal experiments. MQ analyzed the data and wrote the original draft. YL and BT revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Changsha Lvye Biotechnology Limited Company Academician Expert Workstation for biological feed and feed additives and animal intestinal health.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- PGR
post-natal growth retardation
- BW
body weight
- IL-1β
interleukin-1β
- TGFβ
transformed growth factor beta
- IgG
immunoglobulins G
- TNFα
tumor necrosis factor alpha
- IFNγ
interferon gamma
- ELISA
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- GH
growth hormone
- IGF-1
insulin like growth factor-1
- 5-HT
5-hydroxytryptamine
- LEP
leptin
- INS
insulin
- T4
thyroxin
- SS
somatostatin
- GLP-1
glucagon-like peptide 1
- AgRP
Agouti gene-related protein
- POMC
proopiomelanocortin
- IGF-1R
insulin like growth factor-1 receptor
- GHRL
Ghrelin
- 5-HT4R
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4
- GHR
growth hormone receptor
- CCK
cholecystokinin
- SERT
serotonin transporter
- INSR
insulin receptor
- GLP-1R
glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor
- GSH-PX
glutathione peroxide
- GST
glutathione S-transferases
- T-AOC
total antioxidant capacity
- SOD
superoxide dismutase
- MDA
malondialdehyde
- NO
nitric oxide
- TNOS
total nitric oxide synthase
- IUGR
intrauterine growth retardation
- C4
complement 4
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- TLR4
toll-like receptor 4
- MyD88
myeloid differentiation primary response 88
- Nrf2
nuclear factor like-2
- HO-1
heme oxygenase 1
- NQO1
NAD(P)H dehydrogenase 1
- Akt
serine-threonine protein kinase
- mTOR
mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase
- 4EBP1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1
- P70S6K
ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta-1.
Footnotes
Funding. This research was funded by Key Programs of frontier scientific research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-SMC008), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31672433, 31501964, 31560640), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-35), and the Youth Innovation Team Project of ISA, CAS (2017QNCXTD_TBE).
References
- 1.Bamfo JE, Odibo AO. Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. J Pregnancy. (2011) 2011:640715. 10.1155/2011/640715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Michiels J, De Vos M, Missotten J, Ovyn A, De Smet S, Van Ginneken C. Maturation of digestive function is retarded and plasma antioxidant capacity lowered in fully weaned low birth weight piglets. Br J Nutr. (2013) 109:65–75. 10.1017/S0007114512000670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang W, Ma C, Xie P, Zhu Q, Wang X, Yin Y, et al. Gut microbiota of newborn piglets with intrauterine growth restriction have lower diversity and different taxonomic abundances. J Appl Microbiol. (2019) 127:354–69. 10.1111/jam.14304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ritacco G, Radecki SV, Schoknecht PA. Compensatory growth in runt pigs is not mediated by insulin-like growth factor I. J Anim Sci. (1997) 75:1237–43. 10.2527/1997.7551237x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Keusch GT, Denno DM, Black RE, Duggan C, Guerrant RL, Lavery JV, et al. Environmental enteric dysfunction: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and clinical consequences. Clin Infect Dis. (2014) 59:S207–12. 10.1093/cid/ciu485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dewey KG. The challenge of meeting nutrient needs of infants and young children during the period of complementary feeding: an evolutionary perspective. J Nutr. (2013) 143:2050–4. 10.3945/jn.113.182527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Abi Habib W, Brioude F, Edouard T, Bennett JT, Lienhardt-Roussie A, Tixier F, et al. Genetic disruption of the oncogenic HMGA2-PLAG1-IGF2 pathway causes fetal growth restriction. Genet Med. (2018) 20:250–8. 10.1038/gim.2017.105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bagnell CA, Bartol FF. Review: maternal programming of development in the pig and the lactocrine hypothesis. Animal. (2019). 10.1017/S1751731119001654 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Larriestra AJ, Wattanaphansak S, Neumann EJ, Bradford J, Morrison RB, Deen J. Pig characteristics associated with mortality and light exit weight for the nursery phase. Can Vet J. (2006) 47:560–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Caperna TJ, Shannon AE, Blomberg le A, Stoll M, Ramsay TG. Identification of alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AGP) as a potential marker of impaired growth in the newborn piglet. Reprod Fertil Dev. (2013) 25:1126–33. 10.1071/RD12103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen HH, Lin JH, Fung HP, Ho LL, Yang PC, Lee WC, et al. Serum acute phase proteins and swine health status. Can J Vet Res. (2003) 67:283–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eurell TE, Bane DP, Hall WF, Schaeffer DJ. Serum haptoglobin concentration as an indicator of weight-gain in pigs. Can J Vet Res. (1992) 56:6–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alberry M, Soothill P. Management of fetal growth restriction. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2007) 92:F62–7. 10.1136/adc.2005.082297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fattal-Valevski A, Toledano-Alhadef H, Golander A, Leitner Y, Harel S. Endocrine profile of children with intrauterine growth retardation. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. (2005) 18:671–6. 10.1515/jpem.2005.18.7.671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Attig L, Brisard D, Larcher T, Mickiewicz M, Guilloteau P, Boukthir S, et al. Postnatal leptin promotes organ maturation and development in IUGR piglets. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e64616. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Albertsson-Wikland K, Boguszewski M, Karlberg J. Children born small-for-gestational age: postnatal growth and hormonal status. Horm Res. (1998) 49:7–13. 10.1159/000053080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martin-Estal I, de la Garza RG, Castilla-Cortazar I. Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) as a novel condition of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) Deficiency. Rev Physiol Bioch P. (2016) 170:1–35. 10.1007/112_2015_5001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ying ZX, Ge XK, Zhang H, Su WP, Li Y, Zhou L, et al. Effects of dietary methionine restriction on postnatal growth, insulin sensitivity, and glucose metabolism in intrauterine growth retardation pigs at 49 and 105 d of age. J Anim Sci. (2019) 97:610–9. 10.1093/jas/sky457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang H, Li Y, Wang T. Antioxidant capacity and concentration of redox-active trace mineral in fully weaned intra-uterine growth retardation piglets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2015) 6:48. 10.1186/s40104-015-0047-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tao S, Bai Y, Li T, Li N, Wang J. Original low birth weight deteriorates the hindgut epithelial barrier function in pigs at the growing stage. Faseb J. (2019) 33:9897–912. 10.1096/fj.201900204RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tan B, Li XG, Kong X, Huang R, Ruan Z, Yao K, et al. Dietary L-arginine supplementation enhances the immune status in early-weaned piglets. Amino Acids. (2009) 37:323–31. 10.1007/s00726-008-0155-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang HS, Wu F, Long LN, Li TJ, Xiong X, Liao P, et al. Effects of yeast products on the intestinal morphology, barrier function, cytokine expression, and antioxidant system of weaned piglets. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. (2016) 17:752–62. 10.1631/jzus.B1500192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Council NR. Nutrient Requirements of Swine: Eleventh Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; (2012). 420 p. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang J, Li GR, Tan BE, Xiong X, Kong XF, Xiao DF, et al. Oral administration of putrescine and proline during the suckling period improves epithelial restitution after early weaning in piglets. J Anim Sci. (2015) 93:1679–88. 10.2527/jas.2014-8230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods. (2001) 25:402–8. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu G, Bazer FW, Wallace JM, Spencer TE. Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences. J Anim Sci. (2006) 84:2316–37. 10.2527/jas.2006-156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bruininx EMAM, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Schrama JW, Vereijken PFG, Vesseur PC, Everts H, et al. Individually measured feed intake characteristics and growth performance of group-housed weanling pigs: effects of sex, initial body weight, and body weight distribution within groups. J Anim Sci. (2001) 79:301–8. 10.2527/2001.792301x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Greenwood PL, Bell AW. Consequences of intra-uterine growth retardation for postnatal growth, metabolism and pathophysiology. Reprod Suppl. (2003) 61:195–206. 10.1530/biosciprocs.5.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fischer IP, Irmler M, Meyer CW, Sachs SJ, Neff F, Hrabe de Angelis M, et al. A history of obesity leaves an inflammatory fingerprint in liver and adipose tissue. Int J Obes (Lond). (2018) 42:507–17. 10.1038/ijo.2017.224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gotoh K, Fujiwara K, Anai M, Okamoto M, Masaki T, Kakuma T, et al. Role of spleen-derived IL-10 in prevention of systemic low-grade inflammation by obesity. Endocr J. (2017) 64:375–8. 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dong J, Peng T, Gao J, Jia X, Yan G, Wang Y. A pilot and comparative study between pathological and serological levels of immunoglobulin and complement among three kinds of primary glomerulonephritis. BMC Immunol. (2018) 19:18. 10.1186/s12865-018-0254-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nakamoto N, Amiya T, Aoki R, Taniki N, Koda Y, Miyamoto K, et al. Commensal lactobacillus controls immune tolerance during acute liver injury in mice. Cell Rep. (2017) 21:1215–26. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cui Y, Qi S, Zhang W, Mao J, Tang R, Wang C, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri ZJ617 culture supernatant attenuates acute liver injury induced in mice by lipopolysaccharide. J Nutr. (2019). 10.1093/jn/nxz088 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Frehn L, Jansen A, Bennek E, Mandic AD, Temizel I, Tischendorf S, et al. Distinct patterns of IgG and IgA against food and microbial antigens in serum and feces of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e106750. 10.1371/journal.pone.0106750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Su Y, Sun Y, Ju D, Chang S, Shi B, Shan A. The detoxification effect of vitamin C on zearalenone toxicity in piglets. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. (2018) 158:284–92. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ferenc K, Pietrzak P, Godlewski MM, Piwowarski J, Kilianczyk R, Guilloteau P, et al. Intrauterine growth retarded piglet as a model for humans–studies on the perinatal development of the gut structure and function. Reprod Biol. (2014) 14:51–60. 10.1016/j.repbio.2014.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bergan-Roller HE, Sheridan MA. The growth hormone signaling system: insights into coordinating the anabolic and catabolic actions of growth hormone. Gen Comp Endocr. (2018) 258:119–33. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2017.07.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cai C, Ahmad T, Valencia GB, Aranda JV, Xu J, Beharry KD. Intermittent hypoxia suppression of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I in the neonatal rat liver. Growth Horm IGF Res. (2018) 41:54–63. 10.1016/j.ghir.2018.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Murphy LJ, Bell GI, Friesen HG. Tissue distribution of insulin-like growth factor I and II messenger ribonucleic acid in the adult rat. Endocrinology. (1987) 120:1279–82. 10.1210/endo-120-4-1279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Quesnel H, Farmer C. Review: nutritional and endocrine control of colostrogenesis in swine. Animal. (2019) 13:s26–34. 10.1017/S1751731118003555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bikle DD, Tahimic C, Chang W, Wang Y, Philippou A, Barton ER. Role of IGF-I signaling in muscle bone interactions. Bone. (2015) 80:79–88. 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen RJ, Yin YL, Pan J, Gao YL, Li TJ. Expression profiling of IGFs and IGF receptors in piglets with intrauterine growth restriction. Livestock Sci. (2011) 136:72–5. 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.08.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Drozdowski L, Thomson AB. Intestinal hormones and growth factors: effects on the small intestine. World J Gastroenterol. (2009) 15:385–406. 10.3748/wjg.15.385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sangild PT, Malo C, Schmidt M, Petersen YM, Elnif J, Holst JJ, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 2 has limited efficacy to increase nutrient absorption in fetal and preterm pigs. Am J Physiol Reg I. (2007) 293:R2179–84. 10.1152/ajpregu.00395.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Venditti P, Reed TT, Victor VM, Di Meo S. Insulin resistance and diabetes in hyperthyroidism: a possible role for oxygen and nitrogen reactive species. Free Radic Res. (2019) 53:248–68. 10.1080/10715762.2019.1590567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gershon MD, Tack J. The serotonin signaling system: from basic understanding to drug development for functional GI disorders. Gastroenterology. (2007) 132:397–414. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Baganz NL, Blakely RD. A Dialogue between the immune system and brain, spoken in the language of serotonin. Acs Chem Neurosci. (2013) 4:48–63. 10.1021/cn300186b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yadav VK, Ryu JH, Suda N, Tanaka KF, Gingrich JA, Schutz G, et al. Lrp5 controls bone formation by inhibiting serotonin synthesis in the duodenum. Cell. (2008) 135:825–37. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mawe GM, Hoffman JM. Serotonin signalling in the gut–functions, dysfunctions and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2013) 10:473–86. 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wouters MM, Farrugia G, Schemann M. 5-HT receptors on interstitial cells of Cajal, smooth muscle and enteric nerves. Neurogastroent Motil. (2007) 19:5–12. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.00963.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen JX, Pan H, Rothman TP, Wade PR, Gershon MD. Guinea pig 5-HT transporter: cloning, expression, distribution, and function in intestinal sensory reception. Am J Physiol. (1998) 275:G433–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Crowell MD. Role of serotonin in the pathophysiology of the irritable bowel syndrome. Br J Pharmacol. (2004) 141:1285–93. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Coates MD, Mahoney CR, Linden DR, Sampson JE, Chen J, Blaszyk H, et al. Molecular defects in mucosal serotonin content and decreased serotonin reuptake transporter in ulcerative colitis and irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. (2004) 126:1657–64. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.He X, Lu Z, Ma B, Zhang L, Li J, Jiang Y, et al. Effects of dietary taurine supplementation on growth performance, jejunal morphology, appetite-related hormones, and genes expression in broilers subjected to chronic heat stress. Poult Sci. (2019) 98:2719–28. 10.3382/ps/pez054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Willemen SA, De Vos M, Huygelen V, Fransen E, Tambuyzer BR, Casteleyn C, et al. Ghrelin in the gastrointestinal tract and blood circulation of perinatal low and normal weight piglets. Animal. (2013) 7:1978–84. 10.1017/S1751731113001742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Enriori PJ, Evans AE, Sinnayah P, Jobst EE, Tonelli-Lemos L, Billes SK, et al. Diet-induced obesity causes severe but reversible leptin resistance in arcuate melanocortin neurons. Cell Metab. (2007) 5:181–94. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liddle RA. Regulation of cholecystokinin secretion by intraluminal releasing factors. Am J Physiol. (1995) 269:G319–27. 10.1152/ajpgi.1995.269.3.G319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang T, Huo YJ, Shi F, Xu RJ, Hutz RJ. Effects of intrauterine growth retardation on development of the gastrointestinal tract in neonatal pigs. Biol Neonate. (2005) 88:66–72. 10.1159/000084645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Candel-Marti ME, Flichy-Fernandez AJ, Alegre-Domingo T, Ata-Ali J, Penarrocha-Diago MA. Interleukins IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 and periimplant disease. An update. Med Oral Patol Oral Bucal. (2011) 16:E518–21. 10.4317/medoral.16.e518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dong L, Zhong X, Ahmad H, Li W, Wang YX, Zhang LL, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction impairs small intestinal mucosal immunity in neonatal piglets. J Histochem Cytochem. (2014) 62:510–8. 10.1369/0022155414532655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu G, Yu L, Martinez Y, Ren W, Ni H, Abdullah Al-Dhabi N, et al. Dietary saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract supplementation alleviates oxidative stress and modulates serum amino acids profiles in weaned piglets. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2017) 2017:3967439. 10.1155/2017/3967439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yu BP. Cellular defenses against damage from reactive oxygen species. Physiol Rev. (1994) 74:139–62. 10.1152/physrev.1994.74.1.139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cecarini V, Gee J, Fioretti E, Amici M, Angeletti M, Eleuteri AM, et al. Protein oxidation and cellular homeostasis: emphasis on metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2007) 1773:93–104. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.08.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lee J, Ryu H, Ferrante RJ, Morris SM, Ratan RR. Translational control of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by arginine can explain the arginine paradox. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2003) 100:4843–8. 10.1073/pnas.0735876100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Inoki K, Corradetti MN, Guan KL. Dysregulation of the TSC-mTOR pathway in human disease. Nat Genet. (2005) 37:19–24. 10.1038/ng1494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sun SY, Rosenberg LM, Wang X, Zhou Z, Yue P, Fu H, et al. Activation of Akt and eIF4E survival pathways by rapamycin-mediated mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition. Cancer Res. (2005) 65:7052–8. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data is available at NCBI under the accession number GSE136777.