Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet. 1998 Feb 26;76(1):51–57.

Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Patients With Holoprosencephaly and Structural Rearrangements of 7q

Gail H Vance 1,*, Catherine Nickerson 1, Lauren Sarnat 1, Aiwu Zhang 2, Octavian Henegariu 1, Nicole Morichon-Delvallez 3, Merlin G Butler 4, Catherine G Palmer 1
PMCID: PMC6775641  NIHMSID: NIHMS1052225  PMID: 9508065

Abstract

The holoprosencephaly (HPE) sequence is a malformation complex with abnormal midline cleavage of the embryonic forebrain. HPE is genetically heterogeneous with at least 6 different chromosome regions containing genes involved in the expression of the phenotype. HPE3, recently identified as the human Sonic hedgehog gene, is localized to 7q36. We have used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification in 5 cell lines from patients with HPE (3 cases), HPE and sacral agenesis (1 case), and microcephaly (1 case) to further define the structural rearrangements of the long arm of chromosome 7 in each case. All cell lines demonstrated loss of material in the critical region of HPE3 at band 7q36, which includes the Sonic hedgehog gene. We report here the analysis of these patient cell lines. Am. J. Med. Genet. 76:51–57, 1998.

Keywords: holoprosencephaly, brain malformation, chromosome 7, fluorescence in situ hybridization

INTRODUCTION

Holoprosencephaly (HPE) sequence is a developmental field defect involving the forebrain and midface, with an estimated incidence of approximately 1/16,000 individuals [Roach et al., 1977]. The embryonic forebrain fails to divide into cerebral hemispheres, resulting in a single central ventricle. Facial malformation often coincides with the brain malformation and even can “predict the brain” [DeMyer et al., 1963]. DeMyer and Zeman [1963], classified the degrees of HPE into alobar, semilobar, and lobar types. At the mild end of the spectrum are malformations such as microcephaly, absence or hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, and absence or hypoplasia of the olfactory bulbs and tracts.

At least 6 different chromosome regions have been implicated as containing genes involved in HPE. These include 2p, 3p, 7q, 13q, 18p, and 21q [Muenke, 1994], The Human Gene Mapping 11 Conference catalogued 4 putative HPE genes which were designated as follows: HPE1 (21q22.3); HPE2 (2p21); HPE3 (7q36); and HPE4 (18pter-q11) [Frézal and Schinzel, 1991].

A critical region for HPE3 on chromosome 7 was described by Gurrieri et al. [1993] with boundaries flanked by markers D7S392 (TM 196) and D7S292 (pJ71). HPE3 was subsequently shown to be linked to D7S22 at 7q36 by Muenke et al. [1994] in families with autosomal dominant (AD) HPE. Belloni et al. [1995] further characterized 2 sisters with HPE and terminal deletions of 7q36 resulting from abnormal segregation of a balanced reciprocal translocation, t(7;9)(q36;q34), in a mother with mild craniofacial HPE findings. Most recently, the human Sonic hedgehog gene was mapped to 7q36 and found to be mutated in families with AD HPE [Belloni et al., 1996; Roessler et al., 1996].

We report our findings using 24 markers by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification on cell lines from 5 phenotypically abnormal individuals, 3 with HPE, 1 with HPE and sacral agenesis, and 1 patient with microcephaly and mild craniofacial abnormalities. All 5 patients had structural rearrangements involving 7q from 7q35 to 7qter. All carried deletions of the critical region of 7q36, defined by markers D7S392-D7S292, which contains the Sonic hedgehog gene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and Cell Lines

The clinical descriptions and karyotypes of the patients are listed in Table I. G-banded metaphase analysis was performed on all 5 cell lines by standard cytogenetic methods. All lines except V-1 are nontransformed fibroblast cells. V-1 was received as a fixed cell pellet obtained from cord blood. Cell lines GM00657, GM10064, and GM7216 were obtained from the NIGMS Human Genetic Mutant Cell Repository (Camden, NJ). Patient F-1 was previously described [Morichon-Delvallez et al., 1993]. The fifth patient (V-1) was seen at Vanderbilt University. This patient was an infant girl, the fifth child born to a 38-year-old mother. Delivery was by cesarean section performed because of hydrocephalus and oligohydramnios. Multiple congenital anomalies including microcephaly, hypotelorism, single nostril, micrognathia, short neck, and ambiguous genitalia were noted at birth. A head ultrasound study demonstrated HPE. The infant died 47 minutes after birth. An autopsy was denied. Chromosomes studied from cord blood with GTG-banding demonstrated a 46,XX,der(7)t(3;7)(p22;q35) karyotype (Fig. 1), resulting in partial trisomy of 3p and partial monosomy of 7q.

TABLE I.

Clinical Data and Original and Revised Karyotypes of Cell Lines

Cell line Clinical data Original karyotype Revised karyotype Cell type
GM00657 One-month-old white male with cleft palate, microcephaly, and developmental delay 46,XY,t(7;18)(q34;q12.2)mat 46,XY,der(7)t(7;18)(q35;q12.2)mat,del(18)(q12.2) Fibroblasts
GM10064 Female newborn with HPE 46,XX,der(7)t(7;13)(q34;q12.3)pat 46,XX,der(7)t(7;13)(q35;q12.3)pat,der(13)t(7;13)(q36;p13) Fibroblasts
GM7216 25-week female fetus with HPE and cyclopia 46,XX,der(7)t(3;7)(p21.3;q36) NR* Fibroblasts
F-1 23-week male fetus with HPE and sacral agenesis 45,XY,t(7;22)(q36;q11), −22/46,XY,t(7;22) (q36;q11) 45,XY,der(7)t(7;22)(q36;q11.2), −22/46,XY,der(7)t(7;22) (q36;q11.2),del(22)(q11.2) Fibroblasts
V-1 Newborn female with HPE 46,XX,der(7)t(3;7)(p22;q35) NR* Leukocytes from cord blood
*

NR = no revision.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

G-banded karyotype of cell line V-1, 46,XX,der(7)t(3;7)(p22;q35). The arrowhead points to derivative chromosome 7.

Molecular Studies

Genomic DNA was prepared according to standard methods using a cesium chloride gradient [Crkvenjakov and Byus, 1974], Primer pairs for PCR experiments were obtained from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL) or American Type Culture Collection [Rockville, MD]. The primer sequences, allele sizes, and loci order have been previously reported (Table II). Amplification of genomic DNA was performed according to standard procedures with 1 μCi radiolabeled 32P (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) added to a 100 μl master mix of primers and reagents in a 10X stock solution containing 10 pmole/μl of each primer. PCR amplificaiton was programmed as 40 seconds (94°C) for denaturation, 40 seconds (55°C) for annealing, and 80 seconds (65°C) for extension for 30 rounds. Equal amounts of amplified DNA were loaded into the wells of a 6% polyacrylamide/7 M urea sequencing gel. Separated radioactive products were exposed to film overnight. Autoradiographs were scored for the presence or absence of heterozygous alleles.

TABLE II.

Markers Used in This Study and Deletion Map of Cell Lines*

Marker Map position GM00657 GM10064 GM7216 F-1 V-1 References
D7S500 7q32–33
 AFM198zh8 + + + Weissenbach et al. [1992]
D7S684 7q34
 AFM312wb5 + + + + Gyapay et al. [1994]
TCRB 7q35
 VB6–7 + + + + Scherer et al. [1994]
D7S505 7q36
 AFM199zd4 + + Weissenbach et al. [1992]
 yac 1249 + + Green et al. [1994]
 yac 3729 + + Green et al. [1994]
D7S642 7q36
 AFM074wc12 + Gyapay et al. [1994]
D7S483 7q36
 AFM074xg5 + + Weissenbach et al. [1992]
D7S798 7q36
 yac 3401 + + Green et al. [1994]
 AFM205va3 + Gyapay et al. [1994]
D7S637 7q36
 AFM211xc3 Gyapay et al. [1994]
 yac 131 Green et al. [1994]
 yac 849 Green et al. [1994]
EN2 7q36
 pMP4 Logan et al. [1989]
D7S550 7q36
 AFM274xh4 Weissenbach et al. [1992]
 yac 3501 Green et al. [1994]
 yac 2979 Green et al. [1994]
D7S392 7q36
 pTM196 HPE3 Rommens et al. [1988]
D7S22 Critical
 pλgt3 Region Jeffreys et al. [1988]
D7S292 Rommens et al. [1988]
 pJ71
D7S427 7q36
 wcr + Ewart et al. [1993]
 cos 146–7 Riethman et al. [1993]
 cos 146–14 + Riethman et al. [1993]
 cos 146–49 Riethman et al. [1993]
*

wcr = Williams Critical Regional Probe (Oncor, Inc.);

+ = two copies of the marker present; − = a single signal for the marker present.

FISH studies were performed on dividing cells from all patients. A minimum of 10 cells was scored for each probe. Probes included human inserts contained in yeast artificial chromosomes kindly provided by Dr. Eric Green. Cosmid probes HTY146–7, HTY146–14, and HTY146–49, which map to the subelomeric region of 7q (D7S427), were provided by Dr. Robert Moyzis. Commercial probes included the Williams Critical Region probe (chromosome 7), DiGeorge Critical Region probe (chromosome 22), the “coatasome” chromosome 7 paint and centromere probes (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD), and a whole chromosome 13 paint (Cambio, Cambridge, England). The Williams Critical Region probe contains cosmid clones for locus D7S427 as part of the probe mixture. Plasmid probe pMP4 from EN2 was provided by Dr. Alexandra Joyner, D7S392 (TM196) by Dr. Lap-Chi Tsui, and D7S22 was a gift from Dr. Alec Jeffreys.

YAC probes were prepared from either total yeast DNA or Alu-PCR amplification with oligonucleotides CL1, CL2, and CL3 [Lengauer et al., 1990] obtained from Research Genetics. Cosmid and plasmid probes were prepared following standard protocols [Sambrook et al., 1989], FISH was performed following standard methods [Pinkel et al., 1986]. Probes were nick translated with either biotin-dUTP or digoxigenin-dUTP. Detection was accomplished using either avidin conjugated with FITC or a series of antidigoxigenin antibodies conjugated with fluorophores, FITC, rhodamine, or Cy3. All cells were viewed with a Leitz Aristoplan fluorescent microscope with a triple pass filter and enhanced with Adobe Photoshop III software.

The genetic map including plasmid, cosmid, YAC, and microsatellite markers on chromosome 7q is shown in Table II according to the Second International Workshop on Human Chromosome 7 Mapping, 1994 [Tsui, 1995] and Belloni et al. [1995].

RESULTS

The FISH and PCR results are summarized in Table II. All 5 cell lines contain deletions for the critical region of HPE3. The breakpoint in GM00657 occurred between TCRB and D7S505 and everything distal to the breakpoint in 7q36 was lost and not translocated to chromosome 18 as previously reported [Punnett et al., 1979]. Signals for the subtelomeric cosmid, 146–14, were present on the normal chromosome 7 and not on the der(7) or any other chromosome in all cells analyzed (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Partial FISH metaphase from cell line GM00657. Red signals indicate hybridization to the centromeres of the normal chromosome 7 and der(7). Green signals show hybridization of the cosmid 146–14 to the normal chromosome 7 only.

Cell line GM10064 showed one breakpoint at 7q35 and a second breakpoint at 7q36 between loci D7S22 and D7S427. Signals for D7S427 (Williams Critical Region probe and cosmid 146–14) were observed on 13p (Fig. 3a,b), indicating a complex translocation involving the der(7). Therefore, our results indicate that 13q12.3→13qter was translocated to 7q35, 7q35–36 was lost, and 7q36→7qter was translocated to distal 13p.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

a: GM10065 metaphase hybridized with the Williams Critical Region probe (Oncor). The arrowhead indicates the der(13) chromosome with FITC signals for probe D7S427 on 13p. The single arrow points to the normal 7 with signals for both the Elastin gene (ELN) and marker probe D7S427. Double arrows points to the der(7) with signals only for ELN at 7q11.23. b: Metaphase from GM10064 hybridized with probe 146–14 (green signals). Red signal is the chromosome 7 centromere. Arrowhead indicates the der(13). Arrows point to the normal 7 and der(7).

The breakpoint for cell line GM7216 occurred in 7q36 between loci D7S798 and D7S637 and chromatin distal to the breakpoint was lost from the cell. The breakpoint for cell line F-1 occurred at 7q36 within locus D7S798. FISH with the DiGeorge Critical Region probe indicated that most of the long arm of chromosome 22 was translocated to 7q36 (Fig. 4a). However, contrary to the published karyotype, 7q36 was not reciprocally translocated to chromosome 22, and resulted in a deleted chromosome 22. Investigations with the Williams Critical Region probe, cosmid 146–14, and the chromosome 7 paint probe failed to demonstrate signals from 7q on the derivative chromosome 22 (Fig. 4b). In the original report of this karyotype, the authors indicated approximately 50% mosaicism for the translocated chromosome 22 in all cells examined. We estimated that the deleted chromosome 22 was lost in 70–80% of the cells analyzed and resulted in partial monosomy for a small segment of euchromatin of 22q between the centromere and the DiGeorge probe locus, DS22S75.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

a: Cell line F-1 metaphase hybridized with the DiGeorge Critical Region probe (Oncor). Arrowhead indicates the der(7) with most of 22q translocated to 7q36. FITC signals are for D22S75, at 22q11.2, and marker probe, D22S39, at 22q13. The arrow points to the normal chromosome 22. b: Metaphase from cell line F-1 hybridized with cosmid 146–14. Normal chromosome 7 with signals for the centromere and 146–14. The der(7) demonstrates signals for the centromere only. Signals for 146–14 are not observed on the del(22) (arrow).

Cells from a fixed pellet of V-1 were analyzed by FISH. The karyotype indicated a der(7) chromosome with a breakpoint at 7q35. A single fluorescent signal was observed only on the normal chromosome 7 for all markers tested, demonstrating a deletion of 7q36 including the HPE3 critical region.

DISCUSSION

In this report we describe the molecular analysis, utilizing PCR amplification and FISH with plasmid, cosmid, and YAC probes, of 5 patient cell lines with deletions of 7q36 and a phenotype of HPE, microcephaly, or sacral agenesis. Three of the cell lines are contained in the NIGMS Human Genetic Mutant Cell Repository and are widely distributed to researchers around the country. We have revised the karyotypes in 2 of these cell lines (Table II). Cell line GM00657 does not appear to carry a reciprocal translocation as observed in G-banded metaphase analysis [Punnett et al., 1979] or by Southern blot hybridization [Gurrieri et al., 1993], Our studies indicate a terminal deletion of 7q from 7q35–36 to the terminus.

A complex translocation was identified in GM10064, so that in this cell line there is trisomy for 13q12.3→13qter, monosomy for 7q35–36, and disomy for 7q36 to 7qter with the terminal chromosome 7 sequences translocated to 13p. While possible, we do not think these findings are culture induced for the following reasons. These nontransformed fibroblast lines were received and processed at a low passage number and the karyotypes performed on all lines corresponded to those provided by the NIGMS repository. Additionally, the band 7q36 is composed of G-band-negative chromatin and is difficult to distinguish separately from the G-negative chromatin of 18q21 or the satellite of 13p.

A deletion from 7q36 (D7S798) to 7qter and mosaicism for partial monosomy of 22pter→q11.2 were observed in cell line F-1. The patient from whom F-1 was obtained demonstrated sacral agenesis as well as HPE. Reported linkage with markers from 7q indicates gene for AD sacral agenesis maps to the HPE region on 7q and resides between D7S396 (not on our map but centromeric to D7S550) and the telomere, an interval estimated to be less than 10 Mb [Lynch et al., 1995]. Our data indicate that F-1 has haploinsufficiency of the region which contains this putative gene associated with sacral agenesis. Partial monosomy of chromosome 22pter→q11.2 has not been consistently associated with sacral agenesis [Schinzel, 1984], which provides strength for the hypothesis that the chromosome 7 aberration is responsible for this phenotype.

Recently, the human development gene Sonic hedgehog, mapped to the HPE3 critical region [Belloni et al., 1996], was found to be mutated in 5 of 30 families with AD HPE [Roessler et al., 1996]. The human Sonic hedgehog gene (SHH) is one member of a family of genes related to the Drosophila segment polarity gene hedgehog (hh) [Echelard et al., 1993]. Shh is expressed in the notochord, floor plate, and zone of polarizing activity [Johnson et al., 1994], Targeted gene disruption in the mouse (Shh−/−), generated by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells, showed that Shh plays a critical role in the patterning of vertebrate embryonic tissue including the brain, spinal cord, axial skeleton, and limbs. In particular, morphological defects of the forebrain region in homozygous mouse mutants produce the phenotype of cyclopia and a proboscis or single nostril, which are features of the HPE spectrum [Chiang et al., 1996], A role for Shh disruption in caudal regression has been demonstrated in the zebrafish no tail mutant as well as in the mouse [Schulte-Merker et al., 1994]. Therefore, a deletion or disruption of SHH may be responsible for the phenotype in our patient with HPE and sacral agenesis.

Belloni et al. [1996] reported that SHH was not disrupted in affected members of 2 families with translocations involving 7q36, and in fact the translocation breakpoints were estimated to lie 15–250 kb proximal to SHH. These authors proposed a “position effect” leading to aberrant SHH expression caused by the disruption of cis-acting regulatory elements. Our map would indicate haploinsufficiency of SHH in all 5 cell lines and most likely reduced expression of the Sonic hedgehog gene. This information would not explain why the patients from whom these cell lines were obtained expressed a phenotype of HPE while individuals with the 7q deletion syndrome and typically more extensive deletions usually do not have HPE. Perhaps more restricted breakpoints within 7q36 lead to aberrant expression of SHH due to a positional effect as proposed by Belloni et al. 1996, or there may be an imprinting effect with disruption of an imprinting domain as suspected for Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes on chromosome 15 [Lalande, 1994]. Another consideration for cell lines GM10064, GM7216, and V-1 is the interaction of partial monosomy of 7q and the dosage effect of partial trisomies of 13q and 3p, since both trisomies have been associated with the HPE phenotype [Roach et al., 1977; Kurtzman et al., 1987; Berry et al., 1990]. Analysis of the Sonic hedgehog gene in these cell lines is underway. Further analysis of patients with structural cytogenetic rearrangements as reported here will help to elucidate the role of developmental genes, like Sonic hedgehog, in the etiology of a wide range of genetic defects.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mark Stewart for discussion and technical assistance, and Kristen Bennett and Connie Sutton for their clerical help.

REFERENCES

  1. Belloni E, Frumkin A, Scherer SW, Rovet J, Mitchell H, Bamoski B, Hing A, Donis-Keller H, Tsui L-C, Muenke M (1995): Characterization of holoprosencephaly minimal critical region in 7q36. Chromosome 7 workshop 1994. Cytogenet Cell Genet 71:31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Belloni E, Muenke M, Roessler E, Traverso G, Siegel-Bartelt J, Frumkin A, Mitchell HF, Donis-Keller H, Helms C, Hing AV, Heng HHQ, Koop B, Martindale D, Rommens JM, Tsui L-C, Scherer SW (1996): Identification of Sonic Hedgehog as a candidate gene responsible for holoprosencephaly. Nature Genet 14:353–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berry SM, Gosden C, Snijders RJM, Nicolaides KH (1990): Fetal holoprosencephaly, associated malformations and chromosomal defects. Fetal Diagn Ther 5:92–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiang C, Litingtung Y, Lee E, Young KE, Cordin JL, Westphal H, Beachy PA (1996): Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic Hedgehog gene function. Nature 383:407–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crkvenjakov R, Byus C (1974): Ribonucleic acid isolated by cesium chloride centrifugation. Biochemistry 13:2633–2637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeMyer M, Zeman W (1963): Alobar holoprosencephaly (arhinencephaly) with median cleft lip and palate: Clinical electroencephalographic and nosologic considerations. Confin Neurol (Basal) 23:1–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeMyer W, Zeman W, Palmer CG (1963): The face predicts the brain: Diagnostic significance of median facial anomalies for holoprosencephaly (arhinencephaly). Pediatrics 34:256–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Echelard Y, Epstein DG, St. Jacques B, Shen L, Mohler J, McMahon JA, McMahon AP (1993): Sonic Hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell 75:1417–1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ewart AK, Morris CA, Atkinson D, Jin W, Sternes K, Spallone P, Stock AD, Leppert M, Keating MT (1993): Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome. Nature Genet 5:11–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Frézal J, Schinzel A (1991): A report of the committee on clinical disorders, chromosome aberrations, and uniparental disomy. Cytogenet Cell Genet 58:986–1052.1685704 [Google Scholar]
  11. Green ED, Idol JR, Mohr-Tidwell RM, Braden VV, Peluso DC, Fulton RS, Massa HF, Magness CL, Wilson AM, Kimura J, Weissenbach J, Trask BJ (1994): Integration of physical, genetic and cytogenetic maps of human chromosome 7: Isolation and analysis of yeast artificial chromosome clones for 117 mapped genetic markers. Hum Mol Genet 3: 489–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gurrieri F, Trask BJ, Engh GUD, Krauss CM, Schinzel A, Pettenati MJ, Schindler D, Dietz-Band J, Vergnaud G, Scherer SW, Tsui L-C, Muenke M (1993): Physical mapping of the holoprosencephaly critical region in 7q36. Nature Genet 3:247–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gyapay G, Morissette J, Vignal A, Dib C, Millasseau P, Marc S, Bernardi G, Lathrop M, Weissenbach J (1994): The 1993–94 Généthon human genetic linkage map. Nature Genet 7:(2 Spec No)246–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Neumann R, Keyte J (1988): Amplification of human minisatellites by the polymerase chain reaction: Towards DNA fingerprinting of single cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16:109563–10971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson RL, Laufer E, Riddle RD, Tabin C (1994): Ectopic expression of Sonic Hedgehog alters dorsal-ventral patterning of somites. Cell 79: 1165–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kurtzman DN, VanDyke DL, Rich CA, Weiss L (1987): Brief clinical report: Duplication 3p21→3pter and cyclopia. Am J Med Genet 27:33–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lalande M (1994): In and around SNRPN. Nature Genet 8:5–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lengauer C, Green ED, Cremer T (1990): Painting of human chromosomes with probes generated from hybrid cell lines by PCR with Alu and L1 primers. Hum Genet 86:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Logan C, Willard HF, Rommens JM, Joyner AL (1989): Chromosomal localization of the Human homeo box-containing genes, EN1 and EN2. Genomics 4:206–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lynch SA, Bond PM, Copp AJ, Kirwan WO, Nour S, Balling R, Mariman E, Burn J, Strachan T (1995): A gene for autosomal dominant sacral agenesis maps to the holoprosencephaly region at 7q36. Nature Genet 11: 93–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Morichon-Delvallez N, Delezoide AL, Vekemans M (1993): Holoprosencephaly and sacral agenesis in a fetus with a terminal deletion 7q36→7qter. J Med Genet 30:521–524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Muenke M (1994): Holoprosencephaly as a genetic model for normal craniofacial development. Semin Dev Biol 5:293–301. [Google Scholar]
  23. Muenke M, Gurrieri F, Bay C, Yi DH, Collins AL, Johnson VP, Hennikam RCM, Bradley Schaefer G, Weik L, Lubinsky MS, Daack-Hirsch S, Moore CA, Dobyns WB, Murray JC, Arlen Price R (1994): Linkage of a human brain malformation familial holoprosencephaly to human chromosome 7 and evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8102–8106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pinkel D, Straueme T, Gray JW (1986): Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:2934–2938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Punnett HH, Kistenmacher ML, Miller RC, Greene AL, Coriell LL (1979): A (7;18) translocation, 46,XY. Cytogenet Cell Genet 24:126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Riethman HC, Spais C, Buckingham J, Grady D, Moyzis RK (1993): Physical analysis of the terminal 240 kb of DNA from human chromosome 7q. Genomics 17:25–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roach E, DeMyer W, Conneally PM, Palmer CG, Merritt AD (1975): Holoprosencephaly and birth data, genetic demographic analyses of 30 families. Birth Defects: Original Articles Series 11(2):294–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roessler E, Belloni E, Gaudenz K, Jay P, Berta P, Scherer SW, Tsui L-C, Muenke M (1996): Mutations in the human Sonic Hedgehog gene cause holoprosencephaly. Nature Genet 14:357–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rommens JM, Zengerling S, Bums J, Melmer G, Kerem BS, Plavsic N, Zsiga M, Kennedy D, Markiewicz D, Rozmahel R, Riordan JR, Buchwald M, Tsui L-C (1988): Identification and regional localization of DNA markers on chromosome 7 for the cloning of the cystic fibrosis gene. Am J Hum Genet 43:645–663. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989): “Molecular Cloning, a Laboratory Manual.” Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp 9:16–9:23. [Google Scholar]
  31. Scherer SW, Poorkaj P, Allen T, Kim J, Geshuri D, Nuhes M, Soder S, Stephens K, Pagon R, Patton M, Berg MA, Donlon T, Rivera H, Pfeiffer RA, Naritom K, Hughes H, Genuardi M, Guirrireri F, Neri G, Lourein E, Magenis E, Tsui LC, Evans JP (1994): Fine mapping of the autosomal dominant split hand/split foot locus on chromosome 7, band q21.3-q22.1. Am J Hum Genet 55:12–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schinzel A (1984): “Catalogue of Unbalance Chromosome Aberrations in Man.” New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp 719–720. [Google Scholar]
  33. Schulte-Merker S, van Eeden FJM, Halpem ME, Kimmel CB, NüssleinVolhard C (1994): No tail (nt) is the zebrafish homologue of the mouse T (Brachyury) gene. Development 120:1009–1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tsui L-C (1995): Second International Workshop on Human Chromosome 7 Mapping 1994. Cytogenet Cell Genet 71:3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Weissenbach J, Gyapay G, Dib C, Vignal A, Morissette J, Millasseau P, Vaysseix G, Lathrop M (1992): A second-generation linkage map of the human genome. Nature 359:794–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES