Abstract
Cardiac fibrosis is a pathological consequence of radiation-induced fibroblast proliferation and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition (FMT). Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation has been revealed to be an effective treatment strategy to inhibit cardiac fibrosis. We identified a novel MSC-driven mechanism that inhibited cardiac fibrosis, via the regulation of multiple fibrogenic pathways. Hypoxia pre-conditioned MSCs (MSCsHypoxia) were co-cultured with fibroblasts using a Transwell system. Radiation-induced fibroblast proliferation was assessed using an MTT assay, and FMT was confirmed by assessing the mRNA levels of various markers of fibrosis, including type I collagen (Col1) and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). α-SMA expression was also confirmed via immunocytochemistry. The expression levels of Smad7 and Smad3 were detected by western blotting, and Smad7 was silenced using small interfering RNAs. The levels of oxidative stress following radiation were assessed by the detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE). It was revealed that co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia could inhibit fibroblast proliferation and FMT. In addition, the present results indicated that MSCs are necessary and sufficient for the inhibition of fibroblast proliferation and FMT by functionally targeting TGF-β1/Smad7/Smad3 signaling via the release of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Furthermore, it was observed that MSCs inhibited fibrosis by modulating oxidative stress. Co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia alleviated fibroblast proliferation and FMT via the TGF-β1/Smad7/Smad3 pathway. MSCs may represent a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of radiation-related cardiac fibrosis.
Keywords: mesenchymal stem cells, radiation-related cardiac fibrosis, hepatocyte growth factor, TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway, oxidative stress
Introduction
Epidemiological studies have revealed an increased risk of cardiovascular disease associated with high local doses of ionizing radiation to the heart. This can be observed in patients who have received thoracic radiotherapy treatment for breast cancer, Hodgkin's disease, or childhood cancers (1,2). A significant increase in mortality from cardiovascular disease has been reported among patients treated by radiotherapy (3,4). Typically, cardiac symptoms appear late, sometimes decades after exposure to radiation, and include increased infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis of the myocardium, especially after receiving high radiation doses (5). In addition to vascular abnormalities, recent studies have emphasized cardiac fibrosis as a major causal factor for radiation-induced heart disease (6), a condition that is accompanied by an accumulation of fibroblasts and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition (FMT) (7).
One area of interest is the potential for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to repair injured cardiac tissue. MSCs possess the capacity for self-renewal, multipotency, and cytokine secretion (8,9), characteristics which render them ideal for tissue repair or regeneration applications (10,11). Recent studies have indicated that MSCs could potentially exert anti-fibrotic effects in the context of cardiac disease, which may allow for repair of the damaged myocardium (12). Previous studies have revealed that MSCs pre-treated with hypoxia secrete a variety of cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), basic fibroblast growth factor, interleukin-10, as well as others, which act to inhibit cardiac fibrosis (13,14).
TGF-β is considered a ‘master’ cytokine/growth factor produced within injured or diseased tissues, where it activates fibroblasts and facilitates the production of extracellular matrix (ECM), leading to tissue fibrosis (15). TGF-β binds a heterodimeric receptor in the plasma membrane consisting of the TGF-β type I and type II half-receptors, which together induce phosphorylation of Smad3 transcription factors in the canonical signaling pathway (16). Smad7 acts as an inhibitor of TGF-β signaling by interacting with the TGF-β type I receptor, preventing the phosphorylation and activation of Smad3 (17). It has been reported that Smad7 can block TGF-β-induced fibroblast accumulation, inhibiting FMT, which can further inhibit fibrosis (18).
The pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis involves alterations in the cellular and neuro-humoral environments, leading to changes in fibroblast activity and ECM turnover (19,20). The oxidative stress that is induced by radiation is further increased in response to mechanical and metabolic stress, triggering increased activation and proliferation of fibroblasts, which in turn leads to tissue fibrosis (21,22). Notably, abundant data have revealed that MSCs have a strong capacity to suppress oxidative stress, leading to an inhibition of cardiac fibrosis and protective effects (23).
Based on the aforementioned observation, it was hypothesized that hypoxia pre-conditioned MSCs would be superior to MSCs or hypoxia in isolation in inhibiting radiation-induced cardiac fibrosis.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Normal human cardiac fibroblasts (HCFs) were purchased from Cell Applications, Inc. Fibroblasts were maintained in low glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
Bone marrow-derived human MSCs (BM-hMSCs) were purchased from ATCC, and seeded at 5,000 cells/cm2 in DMEM-F12 growth media with 1% Glutamax (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and were grown to 80–85% confluency.
Cell treatment
In order to induce radiation exposure, 1×105 fibroblasts grown in 6-well plates were irradiated in a 15×15 cm2 square field with 5 Gy (6-MeV electron rays; current, 6 A; dose rate, 2 Gy/min) (X RAD 225; PRECISION X-ray, Inc.).
A Transwell system was used to prevent direct contact between hMSCs and HCFs. hMSCs and HCFs were placed in the upper and lower layers of the Transwell plate, respectively, at a density of 1×106 cells/well.
Hypoxia pre-conditioning was performed by incubating MSCs for 30 min in serum-free media in a controlled atmosphere (anaerobic chamber) glove box (855-AC; Plas Labs, Inc.) to scavenge for free oxygen.
To block the HGF function, we used anti-HGF antibody to neutralize the HGF. The anti-HGF antibody was added one hour before cell treatment, and this antibody was purchased from Sigma Aldrich; Merck KGaA (product no. H0652).
Cell proliferation assay
Fibroblast proliferation was determined using an MTT Cell Proliferation Assay kit (ATCC) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 300 µl of MTT reagent was added to each well (1×105 cells) 3 h prior to harvesting. Absorbance at 540 nm was recorded using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate reader. Three repeats were performed.
Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from cardiac fibroblasts with TRIzol (Ambion; ThermoFisher Scientific, Inc.). An ultraviolet spectrophotometer was used to quantify the RNA. cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), as per the manufacturer's protocol. The qPCR was carried out using the Fast Start Universal SYBR Master and a fluorescence quantitative PCR system. RT-PCR was conducted as previously described (24). The relative expression levels were calculated with the 2−∆∆Cq method (25), using GAPDH as the internal control. Primer sets (Invitrogen; ThermoFisher Scientific, Inc.) used are listed in Table I.
Table I.
Genes | Sequences |
---|---|
Col1 | F: 5′-CCTGGAAAGAATGGAGATGATG-3′ |
R: 5′-ATCCAAACCACTGAAACCTCTG-3′ | |
α-SMA | F: 5′-TGACAATGGCTCTGGGCTCTGTAA-3′ |
R: 5′-TTCGTCACCCACGTAGCTGTCTTT-3′ | |
HGF | F: 5′-ACCCTGGTGTTTCACAAGCA-3′ |
R: 5′-GCAAGAATTTGTGCCGGTGT-3′ | |
TGF-β1 | F: 5′-GGACACCAACTATTGCTTCAG-3′ |
R: 5′-TCCAGACTCCAAATGTAG-3 | |
GAPDH | F: 5′-GGGCTGCTTTTAACTCTGGT-3′ |
R: 5′-GCAGGTTTTTCTAGACGG-3′ |
Col1, type I collagen; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; F, forward; R, reverse.
Western blot analysis
Cardiac fibroblasts were lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) to obtain total protein. Protein samples (20 µg) were quantified using BCA Protein Assay kit, and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and then the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore). Then, the membranes were blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline, followed by incubation with the appropriate primary antibodies: Smad7 (1:1,000; product code ab90086; Abcam); Smad3 (1:1,000; product no. 9513); p-Smad3 (1:1,000; product no. 9520); and β-actin, (1:2,000; product no. 4970; all from CST) overnight at 4°C. Membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2,000 dilution; cat. no. 7074; from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and developed using High Sensitivity ECL Substrate kit (product code ab133406; Abcam). The stained protein bands were visualized using Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS equipment, and quantified and analyzed using Quantity One software. Three repeats were performed.
Immunofluorescence
After treatment, cardiac fibroblasts were seeded in cell culture dishes, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, followed by blocking in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA), washed by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). They were then immunolabeled with specific primary antibodies [alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA); 1:200; product code ab32575; Abcam] overnight at 4°C. After rinsing, the cells were incubated with the corresponding FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:250) (product code ab7086; Abcam) in 1% BSA for 1 h at 37°C. Nuclei were stained with DAPI for 5 min at room temperature. Fluorescence was detected under a fluorescence microscope.
ELISA
The concentration of HGF in the supernatant was determined using an HGF Human ELISA kit (Abcam). Samples from each group (groups as follows: Control; Radiation; Radiation + MSCsHypoxia; Radiation + MSCsNormoxia) were collected in sterile tubes and centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 15 min to obtain supernatants. The supernatants were analyzed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Small interfering (si)RNA transfection
siRNAs were used to knock down Smad7 in fibroblasts. A non-targeting siRNA was used as a negative control (Invitrogen; ThermoFisher Scientific, Inc.). The target sequences were as follows: Smad7, GCAGCCTAACCAGACCTTT; Control, AACCTGCGGGAAGAAGTGG. Transfection efficiency was detected by western blotting.
Microarray
Cardiac fibroblasts irradiated were immediately lysed in 500 µl TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and stored at −80°C before purification by a standard phenol-chloroform extraction protocol using the RNAqueous Micro kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The transcriptome was analyzed by microarray using an Affymetrix human array (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and normalized based upon quantiles.
Measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production
Cells were detached from culture plates using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA, collected in 5-ml round-bottom polystyrene tubes, and washed with 1X Wash Buffer (PBS). The cell suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at 400 × g at room temperature, and the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was resuspended in 500 µl of ROS/Superoxide Detection Solution. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the dark. Data were acquired on a FACScan instrument (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity
SOD activity in cells was determined using a colorimetric assay kit (Abcam), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, protein was isolated from cells using lysis buffer (supplied by the kit), and SOD activity was measured using 10 µg of total protein extract. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm.
Lipid peroxidation assay
Lipid peroxidation was measured using an assay kit (Abcam) that measures the formation of malondialdehyde (MDA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, fibroblasts (1×106 cells) were homogenized on ice in 300 µl of MDA lysis buffer (containing 3 µl of 100X butylated hydroxytoluene, supplied by the kit), then centrifuged (13,000 × g for 10 min) to remove insoluble material. The supernatant (200 µl) was added to 600 µl of thiobarbituric acid and incubated at 95°C for 60 min. Samples were then cooled to room temperature in an ice bath for 10 min, and the absorbance at 532 nm was measured on a spectrophotometer.
Determination of 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) levels
The level of 4-HNE was evaluated using commercially available Lipid Peroxidation (4-HNE) Assay kit (product code ab238538), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were tested using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test, and comparisons between two groups were evaluated using a Student's t-test. Analyses were performed using the SPSS package v19.0 (SPSS, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Effects of hypoxia-treated MSCs (MSCsHypoxia) on radiation-induced fibroblast proliferation and FMT
Proliferating fibroblasts and FMT-derived myofibroblasts are the major source of collagen and other ECM proteins during pathological matrix remodeling (26). When irradiated fibroblasts were co-cultured with MSCsHypoxia, fibroblasts exhibited a lower proliferation rates compared to those that were not exposed to MSCs. Additionally, normoxia-conditioned MSCs (MSCsNormoxia) resulted in no inhibition of fibroblast proliferation, compared with the radiation group (Fig. 1A).
In order to investigate whether MSCsHypoxia inhibited FMT, the mRNA levels of various markers of fibrosis including type I collagen (Col1) and α-SMA were measured. It was revealed that irradiated fibroblasts exhibited a significant increase in the levels of Col1 and α-SMA mRNA, whereas co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia reversed this increase (Fig. 1B and C). In addition, fluorescence staining revealed increased α-SMA staining in irradiated fibroblasts compared to those co-cultured with MSCsHypoxia. No increase in α-SMA expression was observed in irradiated fibroblasts co-cultured with MSCsNormoxia (Fig. 1D).
Involvement of HGF in MSCHypoxia-driven inhibition of irradiation-induced fibroblast proliferation and FMT
Since MSCs obtain cytoprotection through their paracrine function, it was explored whether paracrine signaling was involved in the observed anti-fibrotic effects of MSCsHypoxia. An ELISA was conducted to examine the release of HGF, and the results revealed that MSCsHypoxia released more HGF compared to MSCsNormoxia (Fig. 2A). However, the levels of HGF mRNA did not differ between fibroblasts co-cultured with MSCsHypoxia and those co-cultured with MSCsNormoxia (Fig. 2B).
To confirm whether MSC-derived HGF inhibited fibroblast proliferation and radiation-induced FMT, a neutralizing HGF antibody was used to neutralize the HGF protein. As revealed in Fig. 2C, radiation induced the proliferation of fibroblasts, and co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia decreased their proliferation. The addition of the anti-HGF antibody diminished the inhibitory effect of MSCsHypoxia on fibroblast proliferation. Moreover, the ability of MSCsHypoxia co-culture to reduce the radiation-induced increase in of Col1 and α-SMA mRNA levels was also impaired by the addition of the anti-HGF antibody (Fig. 2D and E). Additionally, the anti-HGF antibody abolished the inhibitory effect of MSCsHypoxia on α-SMA protein expression in fibroblasts (Fig. 2F).
Identification of TGF-β1 as a modulator of radiation-induced fibroblast proliferation and FMT
Microarray analysis was conducted to compare gene expression between fibroblasts treated or not treated with radiation (Fig. 3A). Genes with a ≥1.5-fold increase in expression were considered upregulated. It was revealed that TGF-β1 expression was increased upon exposure to radiation. Co-culture with MSCsHypoxia decreased the radiation-induced expression of TGF-β1, while the addition of the anti-HGF antibody increased the expression of TGF-β1 (Fig. 3B).
To investigate the effect of TGF-β1 on radiation-induced fibroblast proliferation and FMT, recombinant TGF-β1 was added to fibroblasts co-cultured with MSCsHypoxia. The addition of recombinant TGF-β1 not only led to a recovery of the impaired fibroblast proliferation induced by the MSCsHypoxia (Fig. 3C), but also increased the mRNA levels of Col1 and α-SMA, which were inhibited by co-culture with MSCsHypoxia (Fig. 3D and E).
Co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia functionally targets TGF-β1/Smad signaling to inhibit fibroblast proliferation and FMT
TGF-β1/Smad signaling is a key pathway involved in FMT and fibrosis (27). Therefore, whether co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia inhibited TGF-β1/Smad signaling to block FMT in fibroblasts, was investigated. As revealed in Fig. 4A-D, radiation was associated with a decrease in Smad7 levels and an increase in p-Smad3 levels in fibroblasts. Moreover, co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia prevented the radiation-induced decrease in Smad7 levels, and inhibited the increase in p-Smad3 levels, in fibroblasts. The addition of the anti-HGF antibody or recombinant TGF-β1 impaired the inhibition of MSCsHypoxia on TGF-β-induced phospho-Smad3, and impaired the expression of Smad7.
To further confirm the role of TGF-β1/Smad signaling in FMT, fibroblasts were transfected with siRNA-Smad7 or a non-targeting RNA as control. As revealed in Fig. 4E and F, fibroblasts that received siRNA-Smad7 exhibited decreased expression of the Smad7 protein, as assessed by western blotting. Functionally, silencing of Smad7 reversed the inhibitory effect of MSCsHypoxia on fibroblast proliferation (Fig. 5A) and on the mRNA levels of Col1 and α-SMA (Fig. 5B and C). As revealed in Fig. 5D, fibroblasts with silenced Smad7 that were co-cultured with MSCsHypoxia still exhibited strong expression of the α-SMA protein, as assessed by immunofluorescence, indicating that TGF-β1/Smad signaling is a key pathway involved in FMT and fibrosis.
MSCHypoxia co-culturing attenuates radiation-induced oxidative stress in fibroblasts
Oxidative stress drives the progression of FMT (28). A marked increase in the generation of ROS (Fig. 6A and B), reduced SOD activity (Fig. 6C), and increased levels of lipid peroxides (MDA and 4-HNE; Fig. 6D and E) were observed in radiation-treated fibroblasts. However, these changes were attenuated when fibroblasts were co-cultured with MSCsHypoxia. The attenuation of oxidative stress induced by MSCsHypoxia was significantly suppressed when fibroblasts were treated with the anti-HGF antibody, recombinant TGF-β1, or siRNA-Smad7.
Discussion
Radiation therapy, used during treatment for various types of cancer, is associated with an increased and dose-dependent risk of delayed-onset heart disease (29). The earliest data associating radiation and heart disease originated from studies of long-term patient outcomes after radiotherapy treatment for malignant cancers (3,30). In these types of treatments, the local radiation doses to some regions of the heart can exceed 40 Gy (31), which results in cardiac damage and different pathologies, primarily fibrosis of the pericardium and myocardium (32). Radiation-related myocardial fibrosis is often asymptomatic and diagnosed relatively late (33). It is characterized by a proliferation of fibroblasts and FMT, which involves the activation of fibroblasts and a transition to α-SMA-expressing myofibroblasts, which produce an excessive amount of ECM, leading to tissue fibrosis (34). The results of the present study revealed that radiation-induced fibroblasts proliferate and undergo FMT.
MSCs exhibited great potential in treating cardiac damages, even without any pre-treatment. In the 2009, Hare et al provided pivotal safety and provisional efficacy data for an allogeneic bone marrow-derived stem cell without any treatment within post-infarction patients (35). It has been theorized that MSCs reduce cardiac fibrosis largely through paracrine signaling mechanisms (36,37), such as via the inhibition of the TGF-β-induced transformation of fibroblast cells into myofibroblasts, which protects against cardiac damage (38). Hypoxia pre-conditioned MSCs have been revealed to have an increase in paracrine signaling (39), which increases protection against irradiation-induced damage (40). In the present study, it was revealed that co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia inhibited the proliferation of fibroblasts and inhibited their radiation-induced transformation into myofibroblasts via paracrine signaling, in an HGF-dependent manner. It was also revealed that the addition of anti-HGF antibody diminished the anti-fibrotic effect of MSCs Hypoxia, confirming the important role of paracrine HGF signaling in limiting radiation-related fibrosis.
Enhanced levels of TGF-β1 are involved in radiation-induced cardiac fibrosis, a condition characterized by excess fibroblast proliferation and a deposition of collagen fibers (41). In line with these observations, the present study revealed a significant increase in TGF-β1 expression induced by radiation, while MSCsHypoxia inhibited the expression of TGF-β1. The activation of TGF-β has been predicted using both transcriptomics and proteomic data sets (15). TGF-β signaling is able to initiate the canonical SMAD transduction pathway, leading to fibrosis (42). Smad7, an inhibitory Smad, inhibits the activation of Smad2 and Smad3 in response to TGF-β activation. Herein, it was demonstrated that co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia induced the expression of Smad7, which was inhibited by radiation, while impairing the radiation-induced phosphorylation of Smad3, indicating that the TGF-β/Smad pathway acts to modulate MSC inhibition of radiation-induced fibrosis.
Previous studies have proposed many complex molecular events which lead to the development of radiation-induced cardiac damage (43). Among all these events, radiation-induced oxidative stress and the associated inflammatory responses are likely the key signaling cascades leading to cardiac damage (44,45). Radiation leads to a significant reduction in the levels of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, and an increase in 4-HNE adducts, which leads to cardiac fibrosis (46). Radiation-induced ROS generation activates MDA and promotes 4-HNE generation, which is accompanied by an inhibition of SOD. The present results revealed that MSCHypoxia treatment was able to attenuate oxidative stress. In addition, treatment with anti-HGF antibody, recombinant TGF-β1 or siRNA-Smad7 abolished the antioxidant effect of MSCsHypoxia. While there were also some limitations, in the following research, in future, whether hypoxia precondition improves the treatment effect of MSCs in radiation-induced cardiac fibrosis in vivo will be investigated.
In conclusion, in the present study, it was revealed that radiation-induced fibroblast proliferation and FMT were attenuated by co-culturing with MSCsHypoxia. In addition, the results revealed that MSCsHypoxia exert anti-fibrotic and radio-protective effects by regulating the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway, and inhibiting oxidative stress via paracrine pathways. The present study provides evidence that MSCs may be a promising candidate for the treatment of radiation-related cardiac fibrosis.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81600278 to WX and 81500261 to MH) and the Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (grant no. 2018KY517 to MH).
Availability of data and materials
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Authors' contributions
LZ and WX made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data. MH was involved in conception and design of the study, and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Smith P, Cunningham D, Hancock BW, Horwich A, Hoskin PJ, Lister A, Radford JA, Rohatiner AZ, Linch DC. Myocardial infarction mortality risk after treatment for Hodgkin disease: A collaborative British cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:206–214. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, Bennet AM, Blom-Goldman U, Brønnum D, Correa C, Cutter D, Gagliardi G, Gigante B, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:987–998. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Darby S, McGale P, Peto R, Granath F, Hall P, Ekbom A. Mortality from cardiovascular disease more than 10 years after radiotherapy for breast cancer: Nationwide cohort study of 90000 Swedish women. BMJ. 2003;326:256–257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7383.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tukenova M, Guibout C, Oberlin O, Doyon F, Mousannif A, Haddy N, Guérin S, Pacquement H, Aouba A, Hawkins M, et al. Role of cancer treatment in long-term overall and cardiovascular mortality after childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1308–1315. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tapio S. Pathology and biology of radiation-induced cardiac disease. J Radiat Res. 2016;57:439–448. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Subramanian V, Borchard S, Azimzadeh O, Sievert W, Merl-Pham J, Mancuso M, Pasquali E, Multhoff G, Popper B, Zischka H, et al. PPARα is necessary for radiation-induced activation of noncanonical TGFβ signaling in the heart. J Proteome Res. 2018;17:1677–1689. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Curigliano G, Cardinale D, Dent S, Criscitiello C, Aseyev O, Lenihan D, Cipolla CM. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: Epidemiology, detection, and management. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:309–325. doi: 10.3322/caac.21341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bagno L, Hatzistergos KE, Balkan W, Hare JM. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for cardiovascular disease: Progress and challenges. Mol Ther. 2018;26:1610–1623. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Golpanian S, Wolf A, Hatzistergos KE, Hare JM. Rebuilding the damaged heart: Mesenchymal stem cells, cell-based therapy, and engineered heart tissue. Physiol Rev. 2016;96:1127–1168. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00019.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ma S, Xie N, Li W, Yuan B, Shi Y, Wang Y. Immunobiology of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:216–225. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Le Blanc K, Mougiakakos D. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:383–396. doi: 10.1038/nri3209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu T, Xie Y, Huang J, Li P, Wang X, Yan Y, Xia T, Li L, Zhu F, Li H, Wu R. The optimal intervention time of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in ameliorating cardiac fibrosis induced by viral myocarditis: A randomized controlled trial in mice. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:3258035. doi: 10.1155/2017/3258035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang L, Ma W, Ma Y, Feng D, Chen H, Cai B. Exosomes in mesenchymal stem cells, a new therapeutic strategy for cardiovascular diseases? Int J Biol Sci. 2015;11:238–245. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.10725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Meng SS, Xu XP, Chang W, Lu ZH, Huang LL, Xu JY, Liu L, Qiu HB, Yang Y, Guo FM. LincRNA-p21 promotes mesenchymal stem cell migration capacity and survival through hypoxic preconditioning. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9:280. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1031-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dobaczewski M, Chen W, Frangogiannis NG. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling in cardiac remodeling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51:600–606. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yamamura Y, Hua X, Bergelson S, Lodish HF. Critical role of Smads and AP-1 complex in transforming growth factor-beta-dependent apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36295–36302. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006023200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hayashi H, Abdollah S, Qiu Y, Cai J, Xu YY, Grinnell BW, Richardson MA, Topper JN, Gimbrone MA, Jr, Wrana JL, Falb D. The MAD-related protein Smad7 associates with the TGFβ receptor and functions as an antagonist of TGFbeta signaling. Cell. 1997;89:1165–1173. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80303-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wei LH, Huang XR, Zhang Y, Li YQ, Chen HY, Yan BP, Yu CM, Lan HY. Smad7 inhibits angiotensin II-induced hypertensive cardiac remodelling. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;99:665–673. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Berk BC, Fujiwara K, Lehoux S. ECM remodeling in hypertensive heart disease. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:568–575. doi: 10.1172/JCI31044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fredj S, Bescond J, Louault C, Potreau D. Interactions between cardiac cells enhance cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and increase fibroblast proliferation. J Cell Physiol. 2005;202:891–899. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lucas JA, Zhang Y, Li P, Gong K, Miller AP, Hassan E, Hage F, Xing D, Wells B, Oparil S, Chen YF. Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta signaling induces left ventricular dilation and dysfunction in the pressure-overloaded heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;298:H424–H432. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00529.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cheema AK, Pathak R, Zandkarimi F, Kaur P, Alkhalil L, Singh R, Zhong X, Ghosh S, Aykin-Burns N, Hauer-Jensen M. Liver metabolomics reveals increased oxidative stress and fibrogenic potential in gfrp transgenic mice in response to ionizing radiation. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:3065–3074. doi: 10.1021/pr500278t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yin TC, Wu RW, Sheu JJ, Sung PH, Chen KH, Chiang JY, Hsueh SK, Chung WJ, Lin PY, Hsu SL, et al. Combined therapy with extracorporeal shock wave and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells remarkably improved acute ischemia-reperfusion injury of quadriceps muscle. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:6012636. doi: 10.1155/2018/6012636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moon J, Schwarz SC, Lee HS, Kang JM, Lee YE, Kim B, Sung MY, Höglinger G, Wegner F, Kim JS, et al. Preclinical analysis of fetal human mesencephalic neural progenitor cell lines: Characterization and safety in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6:576–588. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Teekakirikul P, Eminaga S, Toka O, Alcalai R, Wang L, Wakimoto H, Nayor M, Konno T, Gorham JM, Wolf CM, et al. Cardiac fibrosis in mice with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is mediated by non-myocyte proliferation and requires Tgf-β. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3520–3529. doi: 10.1172/JCI42028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang Q, Ye H, Xiang F, Song LJ, Zhou LL, Cai PC, Zhang JC, Yu F, Shi HZ, Su Y, et al. miR-18a-5p inhibits sub-pleural pulmonary fibrosis by targeting TGF-β receptor II. Mol Ther. 2017;25:728–738. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ruart M, Chavarria L, Campreciós G, Suárez-Herrera N, Montironi C, Guixé-Muntet S, Bosch J, Friedman SL, Garcia-Pagán JC, Hernández-Gea V. Impaired endothelial autophagy promotes liver fibrosis by aggravating the oxidative stress response during acute liver injury. J Hepatol. 2019;70:458–469. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Serrano NA, Mikkelsen R, Canada J, Mezzaroma E, Weiss E, Abbate A. Biomarkers of cardiac injury in patients undergoing thoracic radiation therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2016;223:507–509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hancock SL, Donaldson SS, Hoppe RT. Cardiac disease following treatment of Hodgkin's disease in children and adolescents. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:1208–1215. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.7.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McGale P, Darby SC. Low doses of ionizing radiation and circulatory diseases: A systematic review of the published epidemiological evidence. Radiat Res. 2005;163:247–257. doi: 10.1667/RR3314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Demirci S, Nam J, Hubbs JL, Nguyen T, Marks LB. Radiation-induced cardiac toxicity after therapy for breast cancer: Interaction between treatment era and follow-up duration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:980–987. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Heidenreich PA, Hancock SL, Lee BK, Mariscal CS, Schnittger I. Asymptomatic cardiac disease following mediastinal irradiation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:743–749. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00759-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gabbiani G. The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J Pathol. 2003;200:500–503. doi: 10.1002/path.1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hare JM, Traverse JH, Henry TD, Dib N, Strumpf RK, Schulman SP, Gerstenblith G, DeMaria AN, Denktas AE, Gammon RS, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of intravenous adult human mesenchymal stem cells (prochymal) after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2277–2286. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ranganath S, Levy O, Inamdar M, Karp JM. Harnessing the mesenchymal stem cell secretome for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:244–258. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Molina EJ, Palma J, Gupta D, Torres D, Gaughan JP, Houser S, Macha M. Reverse remodeling is associated with changes in extracellular matrix proteases and tissue inhibitors after mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) treatment of pressure overload hypertrophy. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2009;3:85–91. doi: 10.1002/term.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shao L, Zhang Y, Lan B, Wang J, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Xiao P, Meng Q, Geng YJ, Yu XY, Li Y. MiRNA-sequence indicates that mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes have similar mechanism to enhance cardiac repair. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4150705. doi: 10.1155/2017/4150705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hu X, Xu Y, Zhong Z, Wu Y, Zhao J, Wang Y, Cheng H, Kong M, Zhang F, Chen Q, et al. A large-scale investigation of hypoxia-preconditioned allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for myocardial repair in nonhuman primates: Paracrine activity without remuscularization. Circ Res. 2016;118:970–983. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shin HS, Lee S, Kim YM, Lim JY. Hypoxia-activated adipose mesenchymal stem cells prevents irradiation-induced salivary hypofunction by enhanced paracrine effect through fibroblast growth factor 10. Stem Cells. 2018;36:1020–1032. doi: 10.1002/stem.2818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Seemann I, Gabriels K, Visser NL, Hoving S, te Poele JA, Pol JF, Gijbels MJ, Janssen BJ, van Leeuwen FW, Daemen MJ, et al. Irradiation induced modest changes in murine cardiac function despite progressive structural damage to the myocardium and microvasculature. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Derynck R, Zhang YE. Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling. Nature. 2003;425:577–584. doi: 10.1038/nature02006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Taylor C, Mcgale P, Brønnum D, Correa C, Cutter D, Duane FK, Gigante B, Jensen MB, Lorenzen E, Rahimi K, et al. Cardiac structure injury after radiotherapy for breast cancer: Cross-sectional study with individual patient data. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2288–2296. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hirshfeld JW, Jr, Fiorilli PN, Silvestry FE. Important strategies to reduce occupational radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: No lower limit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:1255–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Viczenczova C, Kura B, Egan Benova T, Yin C, Kukreja RC, Slezak J, Tribulova N, Szeiffova Bacova B. Irradiation-induced cardiac connexin-43 and miR-21 responses are hampered by treatment with atorvastatin and aspirin. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19 doi: 10.3390/ijms19041128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Seawright JW, Samman Y, Sridharan V, Mao XW, Cao M, Singh P, Melnyk S, Koturbash I, Nelson GA, Hauer-Jensen M, Boerma M. Effects of low-dose rate γ-irradiation combined with simulated microgravity on markers of oxidative stress, DNA methylation potential, and remodeling in the mouse heart. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0180594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.