To the Editor:
Stockley and colleagues, authors of the state-of-the-art review of biomarkers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are to be commended for identifying the need for a strategic change in approach to COPD biomarkers (1). It should be highlighted that a concomitant focus on biomarkers of right ventricular (RV)–pulmonary coupling is essential for comprehensive assessment and management of this systemic disease.
Prognostically significant alterations in RV shape and function have been described across the spectrum of COPD (2). However, COPD is a complex and heterogeneous disease, and RV–pulmonary interactions are variable. For instance, cor pulmonale is a well-known phenotype of RV dilation and failure in some patients with COPD, whereas cor pulmonale parvus (i.e., lower RV volumes without significant alterations in RV mass and ejection fraction) has been described in contemporary COPD (3). Washko and colleagues, in a recent publication in this journal, eloquently demonstrated that COPD subphenotyping using computed tomography measure of distal pulmonary arterial vascular morphology correlated with RV phenotype (4). Right intraventricular and right and left interventricular dyssynchrony, as assessed by strain echocardiography, have been associated with COPD and have been shown to improve with pulmonary rehabilitation (5). In patients with COPD and a pulmonary vascular phenotype associated with more severe pulmonary hypertension, biomarkers of RV–pulmonary arterial coupling would be important. The significance and need for bedside biomarkers of RV–pulmonary arterial coupling is increasingly being recognized across the breadth of cardiopulmonary disease processes (6).
A paradigm shift in biomarkers for COPD needs to incorporate assessment of RV–pulmonary coupling to better endotype the disease, assess pulmonary therapeutic targets for RV preservation, and serve as novel endpoints for clinical investigation. Refining, validating, and promoting the use of biomarkers of RV–pulmonary coupling in COPD derived from widely available imaging modalities of computed tomography and echocardiography may have the potential to yield the most dividends.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201905-1065LE on June 12, 2019
Author disclosures are available with the text of this letter at www.atsjournals.org.
References
- 1.Stockley RA, Halpin DMG, Celli BR, Singh D. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease biomarkers and their interpretation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199:1195–1204. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201810-1860SO. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tannus-Silva DG, Rabahi MF. State of the art review of the right ventricle in COPD patients: it is time to look closer. Hai. 2017;195:9–17. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9961-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kawut SM, Poor HD, Parikh MA, Hueper K, Smith BM, Bluemke DA, et al. Cor pulmonale parvus in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema: the MESA COPD study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2000–2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Washko GR, Nardelli P, Ash SY, Vegas Sanchez-Ferrero G, Rahaghi FN, Come CE, et al. COPDGene Investigators Arterial vascular pruning, right ventricular size and clinical outcomes in COPD Am J Respir Crit Care Med [online ahead of print] 13 Feb 201910.1164/rccm.201811-2063OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kanar B, Ozben B, Yıldırım E, Ozmen İ, Aydin R. Right ventricular dyssynchrony and its improvements after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Echocardiography. 2018;35:1335–1341. doi: 10.1111/echo.14019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mehmood M. Right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling-let’s not lose the forest for the trees. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:188. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
