Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Medicine
. 2019 Sep 17;44(5):1719–1728. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4340

Comprehensive circular RNA profiling reveals the regulatory role of the hsa_circ_0137606/miR-1231 pathway in bladder cancer progression

Weijian Li 1,*, Youjian Li 1,*, Zhongxu Sun 1,*, Jun Zhou 1, Yuepeng Cao 1,2, Wenliang Ma 1, Kaipeng Xie 3,4,, Xiang Yan 1,5,
PMCID: PMC6777690  PMID: 31545480

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in males globally. Its progression imposes a heavy burden on patients; however, the expression profile of circular (circ)RNAs in BC progression remains unclear. This study explored changes in circRNA expression during BC progression by sequencing different grade BC samples and normal controls to reveal the circRNA expression profiles of different BC grades. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gens and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses, and protein-protein interaction network construction were used to predict pathways that the differentially expressed circRNAs may participate in. circRNA expression levels were detected using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and dual-luciferase reporter assays were used to investigate the interactions between circRNA and microRNA (miR). Cell Counting Kit-8 and Transwell assays were also performed to detect cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. In total, 244 circRNAs were found to be differentially expressed in high-grade BC compared to low-grade BC, whilst 316 dysregulated circRNAs were detected in high-grade BC compared with normal urothelium. Furthermore, 42 circRNAs overlapped between the two groups, seven of which were randomly selected and detected by RT-qPCR to validate the sequencing results. GO analysis and KEGG pathway analyses revealed that the differentially expressed circRNAs may participate in BC via 'GTPase activity regulation', 'cell junction', and 'focal adhesion' pathways. Of note, we proposed that a novel circRNA in BC progression, hsa_circ_0137606, could suppress BC proliferation and metastasis by sponging miR-1231. Through bioinformatics analysis, we predicted that PH domain and leucine rich repeat protein phosphatase 2 could be a target of the hsa_circ_0137606/miR-1231 axis in BC progression. Using high-throughput sequencing, this study revealed the circRNA expression profiles of different grades of BC and proposed that the novel circRNA, hsa_circ_0137606, suppresses BC proliferation and metastasis by sponging miR-1231. Our findings may provide novel insight into potential therapeutic targets for treating BC.

Key words: circular RNA, progression, bladder cancer, hsa_circ_0137606, microRNA-1231

Introduction

Bladder cancer (BC) is the ninth most common cancer globally, with an annual incidence of 430,000 cases (1,2). It is a complex disease associated with high mortality rates without appropriate treatment (3). BC includes non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive BC (MIBC); ~10-15% of patients with NMIBC will progress to MIBC (4). Currently, there is no ideal treatment for high-grade invasive BC. Radical cystectomy and chemotherapy are alternative treatment options; however, both significantly reduce patient quality of life and survival time (5,6). Therefore, to prevent BC progression more effectively, the mechanisms of BC progression must be investigated.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are 'covalently closed, single-stranded transcripts comprising many RNA species' that are ubiquitous throughout molecular biology (7). Although circRNAs have been observed in eukaryotic cells for decades, they were mainly perceived as products of splicing errors (8). circRNAs are not easily separated from other RNA species by size or electrophoretic mobility (9), hence they are rarely studied intensively. Recent developments in high-throughput deep sequencing and computational approaches have piqued interest in single-stranded circRNA (10).

In the past few years, considerable efforts have been devoted to circRNAs; it has been revealed that they are closely related to the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease and neurological disorders, among others (11-13). Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have shown that circRNAs participate in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and other malignant cancer processes (14-18). Memczak et al (19) and Hansen et al (13) reported that circRNAs containing microRNA (miRNA/miR) response elements could interact with miRNAs as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) to regulate the expression of target mRNAs. Since then, accumulating circRNA dysregulation was found to be associated with BC by functioning as ceRNAs (20,21). High-throughput sequencing and transcriptional analysis have been carried out to elucidate the association between circRNAs and BC, revealing considerable circRNA expression in BC (22,23). Information regarding circRNA expression in different grades of BC remains very limited; therefore, we investigated differences in the circRNA expression profiles of different grades of BC and normal urothelial cells to identify novel targets for the diagnosis and treatment of BC.

In the present study, we sequenced tissues from different grades of BC and normal controls to define their circRNA expression profiles. We focused on hsa_circ_0137606, which was significantly downregulated in BC, finding that it could suppress BC cell proliferation and metastasis by sponging miR-1231. We aimed to provide potential therapeutic targets for MIBC.

Materials and methods

Tissue collection

Our study was conducted according to the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital and the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School. Patients with a history of other cancers, preoperative chemotherapy, or radiotherapy were excluded. Each patient provided written informed consent before tissue samples were collected. A total of 13 patients were employed for tissue collection (age 48-74; 5 males, 8 females), comprising high-grade BC, low-grade BC and a normal control. All samples were placed in frozen storage tubes with RNAlater (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. Three pairs of tissue specimens were randomly chosen for high-throughput sequencing.

RNA extraction

TRIzol® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to extract total RNA from the paired cancer and normal control tissues according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA purity and concentration were checked by A260/A230 (>1.6) and OD A260/A280 (>1.8). Quality and yield were assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and RNA 6000 Nano Lab Chip Kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc.).

Sequencing process and analysis

Whole transcriptome library preparation and deep sequencing were conducted by Biomarker Technologies Co, Ltd. Total RNA quality and purity were determined using an ultra-micro spectrophotometer (optical density 260 nm, NanoDrop; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and circRNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. IlluminaHiSeq 4000 sequencing (Illumina, Inc.) was used to sequence the libraries. FastQC was used to check the raw data. After the data had been filtered, clean circRNA reads were mapped on to the human reference genome (release hg19). Spliced reads per billion mapping was used to quantify circRNA expression levels. DESeq R package was used to identify the significantly dysregulated circRNAs with cut-off criteria: P<0.05 and |log2 fold change|>1.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

After RNA was isolated from the 13 tissue specimen pairs, cDNA was synthesized using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. qPCR (ABI VII7 PCR System, Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was conducted in a 20 μl reaction volume (10 μl SYBR Green Master Mix, 0.8 μl PCR Forward Primer (10 μM), 0.8 μl PCR Reverse Primer (10 μM), 0.4 μl ROX, 2 μl cDNA, and 6 μl nuclease-free water) with the following protocol: Initiation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C (5 sec) and 60°C (34 sec). GAPDH was used as a reference and reactions were performed in three independent wells. The 2-ΔΔCq method (24) was used to calculate relative RNA expression levels. Primers sequences are presented in Table SI.

Bioinformatics analysis

GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed to explore the biological functions of dysregu-lated circRNAs. The R package clusterProfiler (25) was used to analyze biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions enriched for circRNA-derived genes. Hypergeometric testing was performed in the enrichment analysis to identify GO entries significantly enriched compared with the whole genome. The R package clusterProfiler was used for KEGG pathway analysis to explore the biological pathways in which the dysregulated circRNAs participate. Metascape analysis was performed using online tool metascape (www.metascape.org). Protein-protein-interaction (PPI) network was constructed using online tool STRING (https://string-db.org/). Online tool miRTarBase (http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/php/index.php) was used to investigate the miRNA-mRNA interactions.

Cell transfection with small interfering (si)RNA

Hsa_ circ_0137606 was specifically knocked down using siRNA (5′-GGC AGC TGA TGT GCT CAT CTT-3′) designed by CircInteractome (26) (http://circinteractome.nia.nih.gov) and synthesized (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.) to target the hsa_circ_0137606 back-splice junction. Scramble siRNA (5′-CCG UGC TGA TGT GCT CAT CTT-3′) was the negative control (NC). T24 cells were transfected with 100 pmol of siRNA using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and harvested after 48 or 72 h for RT-qPCR or other experiments.

Cell culture

Human BC cell lines T24 and normal Urinary epithelial cells SV-HUC-1 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. SV-HUC-1 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagles medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.); T24 cells were cultured with RPMI 1640 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. All these cell lines were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

Hsa_circ_0137606-wild type (WT) and hsa_circ_0137606-mutant (Mut) were constructed using pGL3-Basic luciferase vectors (Promega Corporation) and transfected into BC cells with or without NC or miR-1231 mimics, respectively. After 48 h, a dual-luciferase reporter assay kit (Promega Corporation) was used to determine lucif-erase activity. Renilla luciferase was used for normalization.

The luciferase activities were measured using a luciferase assay kit (Promega Corporation). Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate.

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) proliferation assay. Transfected cells were cultured in 96-well plates (1,000 cells/well) for 0, 24, 48, 72 or 96 h. According to the manufacturer's protocols, a CCK-8 (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc.) was used to detect cell proliferation. A total of 10 μl of CCK-8 solution was added to each well of the 96-well plate and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. The absorbance (450 nm) was measured using a Sunrise Microplate Reader (Tecan Group, Ltd.). Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate.

Transwell assays

A 24-well Transwell chamber (Costar; Corning, Inc.) precoated with or without Matrigel was used to detect cell migratory or invasive abilities, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were cultured in the upper chamber (pre-coated with Matrigel for the invasion assay) with 200 ml serum-free media. The lower chamber was filled with 600 ml of 20% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and RPMI 1640 medium. After 48 h, the cells that had migrated to the lower chamber were fixed using formaldehyde (4%, room temperature, 1 h) and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (room temperature, 20 min). The cells were observed and photographed using Axio Observer D1 microscope (magnification, ×100 times, Zeiss AG). Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp.) and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc.) was selected for data analysis and plotting. The measured data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Each experiment was repeated three times. The differences between groups were assessed by a Student's t test and one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparison between the groups was performed using a Student-newman-Keuls post hoc-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

circRNA expression profiles for different grades of BC and normal controls

Heatmaps (Fig. 1A and B) and MA plots (Fig. 1C and D) were used to demonstrate variation in circRNA expression. In high-grade BC tissues, 316 circRNAs were dysregulated compared with NCs (205 upregulated and 111 downregulated) and 244 circRNAs were dysregulated compared with low-grade BC tissues (109 upregulated and 135 downregu-lated). Further analysis indicated that 42 dysregulated circRNAs overlapped between the two groups (Table I). These differentially expressed circRNAs will be valuable in future studies to reveal the physiopathological mechanisms of BC progression.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Differentially expressed circRNAs in different grades of bladder cancer and normal urothelium tissues. (A) Heatmap for the expression profiles of circRNAs with significantly different expression in the H vs. L and N groups. The key presented the fold change of these dysregulated circRNAs. (B and C) MA plots of circRNAs dysregulated in the two groups. circRNA, circular RNA; H, high-grade bladder cancer; L, low-grade bladder cancer; N, normal tissue.

Table I.

Overlapped differential circRNAs in two groups.

circRNA Position Gene symbol log2 cold change P-value
H vs. L H vs. N H vs. L H vs. N
hsa_circ_0020840 chr11:3418346-3418636 TCONS_l2_00004347 10.019 10.017 0.0103 0.0079
hsa_circ_0103136 chr15:24369721-24426402 TCONS_00023304 9.809 9.808 0.0122 0.0094
hsa_circ_0078816 chr6_cox_hap2:2834337-2836058 None 9.398 9.388 0.0161 0.0127
hsa_circ_0030392 chr13:64608479-64608670 TCONS_l2_00007568 8.846 8.817 0.0065 0.0047
hsa_circ_0071818 chr5:9318483-9380135 SEMA5A 8.744 8.742 0.0301 0.0242
hsa_circ_0006329 chr5:9421788-9437964 SEMA5A 8.559 8.557 0.0359 0.0289
hsa_circ_0002099 chr5:9190378-9238002 SEMA5A 8.530 8.529 0.0370 0.0295
hsa_circ_0084606 chr8:62531536-62566219 ASPH 8.521 8.511 0.0357 0.0287
hsa_circ_0136698 chr8:51415337-51449368 SNTG1 8.487 8.485 0.0384 0.0309
hsa_circ_0099364 chr12:83250788-83324324 TMTC2 8.472 8.470 0.0391 0.0313
hsa_circ_0071820 chr5:9337824-9380135 SEMA5A 8.472 8.470 0.0390 0.0312
hsa_circ_0081963 chr7:111127293-111161505 IMMP2L 8.451 4.722 0.0128 0.0476
hsa_circ_0063865 chr22:48081948-48082955 None 8.395 8.347 0.0426 0.0359
hsa_circ_0009130 chr19:1147307-1154401 SBNO2 8.330 8.328 0.0442 0.0360
hsa_circ_0114699 chr20:13550153-13568017 TASP1 8.292 8.274 0.0027 0.0017
hsa_circ_0007632 chr20:34312491-34313077 RBM39 8.255 8.222 0.0145 0.0110
hsa_circ_0088274 chr9:119976636-119977021 ASTN2 8.064 8.032 0.0072 0.0048
hsa_circ_0115417 chr20:4913100-4951565 SLC23A2 8.052 8.023 0.0253 0.0191
hsa_circ_0140725 chrY:14493981-14518736 GYG2P1 8.042 8.039 0.0301 0.0221
hsa_circ_0023256 chr11:68529002-68530229 CPT1A 7.956 7.913 0.0344 0.0278
hsa_circ_0001377 chr3:195605123-195615477 TNK2 7.912 7.901 0.0375 0.0285
hsa_circ_0139039 chr9:81035195-81038128 None 7.891 7.872 0.0363 0.0279
hsa_circ_0007071 chr5:43122140-43139411 ZNF131 7.850 7.812 0.0430 0.0347
hsa_circ_0082583 chr7:138209985-138223548 TRIM24 7.846 7.818 0.0406 0.0317
hsa_circ_0006423 chr1:94140169-94140497 BCAR3 7.840 7.814 0.0409 0.0318
hsa_circ_0128896 chr5:34922321-34923339 BRIX1 7.495 7.482 0.0322 0.0227
hsa_circ_0124765 chr3:8977554-9000685 RAD18 7.349 7.323 0.0442 0.0328
hsa_circ_0007766 chr17:37864573-37866734 ERBB2 3.801 4.970 0.0124 0.0015
hsa_circ_0072654 chr5:64084777-64100213 CWC27 -7.504 -8.169 0.0403 0.0017
hsa_circ_0109103 chr19:13246013-13247219 NACC1 -7.520 -7.334 0.0330 0.0347
hsa_circ_0004113 chr3:66293626-66313803 SLC25A26 -7.595 -7.791 0.0267 0.0336
hsa_circ_0102172 chr14:56083234-56086030 KTN1 -7.677 -7.347 0.0189 0.0302
hsa_circ_0008510 chr9:86279944-86292876 UBQLN1 -7.719 -8.367 0.0166 0.0010
hsa_circ_0008426 chr4:129919028-129925031 SCLT1 -7.796 -8.642 0.0447 0.0004
hsa_circ_0099708 chr13:100191699-100196249 TM9SF2 -7.863 -8.315 0.0112 0.0013
hsa_circ_0096402 chr11:73418460-73429763 RAB6A -8.185 -9.166 0.0180 0.0001
hsa_circ_0005004 chr7:44714009-44714867 OGDH -8.217 -8.650 0.0028 0.0004
hsa_circ_0005746 chr19:55756487-55757046 PPP6R1 -8.332 -7.899 0.0018 0.0060
hsa_circ_0125309 chr4:129042980-129043343 LARP1B -8.344 -7.240 0.0024 0.0406
hsa_circ_0005429 chr14:67768105-67770316 MPP5 -8.379 -8.285 0.0019 0.0015
hsa_circ_0006784 chr7:151960100-152012423 MLL3 -9.080 -8.338 0.0003 0.0011
hsa_circ_0001882 chr9:114148656-114154104 KIAA0368 -9.098 -10.335 0.0214 0.0005
hsa_circ_0137606 chr9:107513236-107521452 NIPSNAP3A -9.204 -8.101 0.0213 0.0494

circRNA, circular RNA; H, high-grade bladder cancer; L, low-grade bladder cancer; N, normal tissue. Bold font indicates the key circRNA of our study.

RT-qPCR validation of the differentially expressed circRNAs

To validate the sequencing data, 10 pairs of tissue specimens were collected for RT-qPCR analysis. A total of seven circRNAs were randomly selected for RT-qPCR quantification. As shown in Fig. 2A-G, the RT-qPCR results were consistent with the expression profiles of our high-throughput sequencing data, in which, hsa_circ_0137606 exhibited a high degree of downregulation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction validation of candidate circRNAs in different grades of BC and normal urothelium tissues. (A-E) circRNAs downregulated in high-grade BC compared with low-grade BC and normal urothelium tissues. (F and G) circRNAs upregulated in high-grade BC compared with low-grade BC and normal urothelium tissues. Data were shown as the mean ± standard deviation, *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. BC, bladder cancer; circRNA, circular RNA.

GO and KEGG pathway analyses

Studies have revealed that circRNAs can exert biological functions by regulating neighboring coding genes (27-29). GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed on dysregulated circRNAs from the two groups to investigate the mechanisms involved in BC tumorigenesis and progression.

GO analysis of the H vs. N groups demonstrated that the dysregulated circRNAs were enriched for 'extracellular matrix organization' and 'positive GTPase activity' regulation biological processes, 'cell junction' and 'focal adhesion' cellular components, and 'GTPase activity' molecular functions. The top 10 significantly enriched GO terms for the two groups are shown in Figs. 3A-C and S1A-C, whilst their top 10 enriched KEGG pathways are presented in Figs. 3D and S1D. The enrichment network of the dysregulated circRNAs was constructed using metascape (Figs. 4 and S2) (30).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

GO and KEGG analyses of the differentially expressed circRNAs in the H vs. N groups. Top 10 GO terms for (A) biological processes, (B) cellular components, and (C) molecular functions for dysregulated circRNAs in the H vs. N groups. (D) Top 10 KEGG pathways for dysregulated circRNAs in the H vs. N groups. circRNA, circular RNA; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; H, high-grade bladder cancer; N, normal tissue.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Enrichment network of circRNAs dysregulated in the H vs. N groups. Enrichment network of the circRNAs dysregulated in the H vs. N groups. Nodes represent functions enriched for an annotated ontology term and node size indicates the number of genes that fall into that term. Nodes are clustered into subnetworks that representatively describe the annotations. P<0.01 was the cutoff criteria. circRNA, circular RNA; H, high-grade bladder cancer; N, normal tissue.

PPI network construction and target gene prediction

To investigate the potential associations between circRNAs and BC progression, we constructed a protein-protein-interaction (PPI) network based on the circRNA genes dysregulated in both the H vs. N and H vs. L groups. As shown in Fig. S3, receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 precursor (ERBB2(exhibited the highest degree of connectivity.

Hsa_circ_0137606 knockdown promotes BC cell proliferation and metastasis

The expression of hsa_circ_0137606 was validated in normal uroepithelial cells (SV-HUC1) and different BC cell lines (Fig. 5A), revealing its significant downregulation in different BC cells compared with SV-HUC1 cells. To investigate its biological function in BC, we knocked down hsa_circ_0137606 in T24 cells. RT-qPCR revealed that hsa_circ_0137606 expression was significantly decreased in the hsa_circ_0137606-knockdown group compared with the NC group after transfection (Fig. 5B). We performed a CCK-8 assay to explore the effect of hsa_circ_0137606 on cell proliferation; hsa_circ_0137606 knockdown led to significant increases in BC cell proliferation compared with the NC group at 72 and 96 h (Fig. 5C). The Transwell assays revealed that hsa_circ_0137606 knockdown significantly promoted BC cell migration (Fig. 5D) and invasion (Fig. 5E) compared with the NC group. In summary, hsa_circ_0137606 knockdown promoted the proliferation and metastasis of BC cells in vitro.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Hsa_circ_0137606 knockdown suppresses BC cell proliferation, migration and invasion. (A) Hsa_circ_0137606 expression in normal uroepithelial cell and different BC cell lines detected with reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. (B) Hsa_circ_0137606 knockdown in T24 cells. (C) Cell Counting Kit-8 assay of proliferation in the knockdown and control groups. (D) Transwell assay of migration in the knockdown and control groups. (E) Transwell assay of invasion in the knockdown and control groups. Scale bar, 125 μm (F) Candidate target genes predicted by the Circ-interactome of miR-1231 in bladder cancer. Data were shown as the mean ± standard deviation, *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. si-NC. Hsa, homo sapiens; NC, negative control; si, small interfering RNA; circRNA, circular RNA; ATP5C1, ATP, synthase F1 subunit gamma; CD164, cluster of differentiation 164; CYP1A1, cytochrome P450 1A1; GINM1, glycoprotein integral membrane 1; miR, microRNA; PHLPP2, PH domain and leucine rich repeat protein phosphatase 2; STIM1, stromal interaction molecule 1; STARD13, StAR related lipid transfer domain containing 13; THYN1, thymocyte nuclear protein 1.

Using bioinformatics analysis, we predicted potential target genes that miR-1231 may bind to and regulate during BC progression; the miRNA-mRNA interactions were validated via miRTarBase. As presented in Fig. 5F, the top eight predicted target genes that miR-1231 may regulate during BC progression were identified.

Hsa_circ_0137606 suppresses BC proliferation and metastasis by sponging miR-1231

circRNAs can act as miRNA sponges to regulate cells; therefore, we performed bioinformatics analysis and predicted the miRNAs that hsa_circ_0137606 could act as a sponge for; miR-1248, miR-1263, miR-1298 and miR-1231 were the four most likely miRNAs. To validate this prediction, we determined the expression of the four miRNAs in the hsa_circ_0137606-knockdown and control groups, finding that only miR-1231 was significantly increased in the knockdown group (Fig. 6A). Luciferase assays were performed to further investigate the role of miR-1231, revealing that hsa_circ_0137606 could bind to miR-1231 as its sponge (Fig. 6B and C). Rescue experiments showed that miR-1231 inhibitor treatment in hsa_circ_0137606-silenced cells significantly rescued their proliferation (Fig. 6D and E), suggesting that hsa_circ_0137606 suppresses BC proliferation and metastasis by sponging miR-1231.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Hsa_circ_0137606 knockdown suppresses BC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by sponging miR-1231. (A) Expression of different miRNAs in the knockdown and control groups detected by RT-qPCR. ***P<0.001. (B) miR-1231 and hsa_circ_0137606 binding sites. (C) Luciferase intensity of T24 cells transfected with hsa_circ_0137606 (WT/Mut) and miR-1231 (control/mimics). (D) RT-qPCR reveal the expression level of hsa_circ_0137606 in T24 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. **P<0.01. (E) Cell Counting Kit-8 assay of the proliferation of T24 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Hsa, homo sapiens; miR, microRNA; Mut, mutant; NC, negative control; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; si, small interfering RNA; WT, wild type.

Discussion

Since the breakthrough in sequencing technology in 2013 (19), numerous circRNAs have been discovered and many studies have been conducted to investigate their potential functions in disease, particularly cancer (31-34). The mechanism of a few circRNAs in BC tumorigenesis have been revealed (35,36); however, the relationship between circRNAs and the process by which low-grade BC progresses to high-grade BC remains unclear. Therefore, we performed high-throughput sequencing to detect dysregulated circRNAs in different grades of BC and normal controls.

A total of 316 and 244 dysregulated circRNAs were discovered in the H vs. N and H vs. L groups, respectively. Among these, circADAMTS14 has been reported to suppress hepato-cellular carcinoma progression by competitively combining with microRNA-572 (37). Moreover, Xu et al (36) found that circPTK2 participates in the proliferation and migration of BC cells. Our further analysis revealed that 42 circRNAs overlapped between the H vs. N and H vs. L groups.

GO and KEGG pathway analysis were performed to investigate the potential molecular mechanisms of these dysregulated circRNAs. GO analysis revealed that 'GTPase activity regulation' was significantly enriched. GTPases have been strongly implicated in cancer (38); a previous study revealed that dynamin 2 GTPase contributes to the formation of invadopodia, which play an important role in invasive BC cells (12). Liu et al (20) also found that ANXA7 GTPase activity could markedly affect prostate cancer metastasis, indicating that these dysregulated circRNAs could participate in the progression of BC by regulating GTPase activity. Additionally, pathway analysis revealed that 'actin cytoskeleton regulation', 'focal adhesion', and 'cGMP-PKG signaling pathway' were enriched. Peng et al (39) and Ohishi et al (40) found that the actin cytoskeleton serves a crucial role in cancer invasion. The focal adhesion pathway is also involved in cancer cell invasion (41), migration (42), and therapy resistance (23). Consequently, we speculated that the dysregulated circRNAs we detected predominantly participate in BC progression via such pathways.

To further investigate the association between circRNAs and BC, we constructed a PPI network based on the circRNA gene symbols dysregulated in both the H vs. N and H vs. L groups. We found that ERBB2, which serves a key role in the development of breast cancer (43), had the highest degree of connectivity. Previous studies have revealed that ERBB2 could be involved in BC (44,45), indicating that the differently expressed circRNAs may affect BC progression by regulating ERBB2.

To validate our results, we performed RT-qPCR on seven circRNAs in independent tissues; the novel circRNA, hsa_circ_0137606, was selected for further analysis. RT-qPCR was performed on normal uroepithelial cells and different BC cell lines to validate its expression, finding it to be significantly downregulated in BC cells (particularly T24 cells). Functional in vitro experiments demonstrated that hsa_circ_0137606 could suppress BC cell proliferation, migration and invasion. A previous study (46) indicated that circRNAs containing miRNA-binding sites could act as cellular miRNA sponges. By binding miRNA, they could prevent its inhibitory effect on target genes and thus indirectly regulate their expression. By using bioinformatics and RT-qPCR analyses, we predicted that hsa_circ_0137606 could act as a sponge for miR-1231, with luciferase reporter assays further validating this finding. Rescue experiments showed that inhibiting miR-1231 significantly rescued hsa_circ_0137606 knockdown-induced proliferation, whilst previous studies have shown that miR-1231 has a role in multiple malignant tumors (47,48). Furthermore, we used miRTarBase to predict the eight most likely target genes of miR-1231, one of which was PH domain and leucine rich repeat protein phosphatase 2 (PHLPP2I) which has been shown to be involved in BC progression as an miRNA target gene (49,50); thus, PHLPP2 may be a promising target of miR-1231 in BC. However, some limitations should be mentioned in this study. First, the number of samples for sequencing was rather low, more samples should be employed for future detection to verify our results. Secondly, when the expression of hsa_circ_0137606 was explored in different BC cell lines, we did not select a non-bladder cell as control group. Non-bladder control cells could improve the reliability of the results. In conclusion, we used high-throughput sequencing to identify aberrantly expressed circRNAs in different grades of BC. Using bioinformatics analysis, we found that these dysreg-ulated circRNAs could synergistically contribute towards BC progression. Furthermore, we revealed that hsa_circ_0137606, which is significantly downregulated in BC, could suppress BC proliferation and metastasis by sponging miR-1231. This study suggests that hsa_circ_0137606 could be an effective therapeutic target for BC.

Supplementary Data

Supplementay_Data.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Abbreviation

BC

bladder cancer

ceRNAs

competitive endogenous RNAs

PPI

protein-protein interaction

NMIBC

non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

MIBC

muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Funding

The present study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81772712 and 81702569) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20170151).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

WL made substantial contributions to the design of the present study; YC and JZ acquired the data. ZS and WM performed the experiments. LY analyzed and interpreted the data; KX and XY were involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital and the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School. Written informed consent was obtained from patients.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Antoni S, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Znaor A, Jemal A, Bray F. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: A global overview and recent trends. Eur Urol. 2017;71:96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cumberbatch MGK, Jubber I, Black PC, Esperto F, Figueroa JD, Kamat AM, Kiemeney L, Lotan Y, Pang K, Silverman DT, et al. Epidemiology of bladder cancer: A systematic review and contemporary update of risk factors in 2018. Eur Urol. 2018;74:784–795. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kamat AM, Hahn NM, Efstathiou JA, Lerner SP, Malmström PU, Choi W, Guo CC, Lotan Y, Kassouf W. Bladder cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:2796–2810. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30512-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Soukup V, Čapoun O, Cohen D, Hernández V, Babjuk M, Burger M, Compérat E, Gontero P, Lam T, MacLennan S, et al. Prognostic performance and reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 world health organization grading classification systems in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A European association of urology non-muscle invasive bladder cancer guidelines panel systematic review. Eur Urol. 2017;72:801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Funt SA, Rosenberg JE. Systemic, perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and future horizons. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:221–234. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sargos P, Baumann BC, Eapen L, Christodouleas J, Bahl A, Murthy V, Efstathiou J, Fonteyne V, Ballas L, Zaghloul M, et al. Risk factors for loco-regional recurrence after radical cystectomy of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic-review and framework for adjuvant radiotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;70:88–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer. J Clin. 2016;66:115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vicens Q, Westhof E. Biogenesis of circular RNAs. Cell. 2014;159:13–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jeck WR, Sharpless NE. Detecting and characterizing circular RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:453–461. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li X, Yang L, Chen LL. The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs. Mol Cell. 2018;71:428–442. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holdt LM, Stahringer A, Sass K, Pichler G, Kulak NA, Wilfert W, Kohlmaier A, Herbst A, Northoff BH, Nicolaou A, et al. Circular non-coding RNA ANRIL modulates ribosomal RNA maturation and atherosclerosis in humans. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12429. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen F, Chen X, Yang D, Che X, Wang J, Li X, Zhang Z, Wang Q, Zheng W, Wang L, et al. Isoquercitrin inhibits bladder cancer progression in vivo and in vitro by regulating the PI3K/Akt and PKC signaling pathways. Oncol Rep. 2016;36:165–172. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.4794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, Kjems J. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495:384–388. doi: 10.1038/nature11993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Han D, Li J, Wang H, Su X, Hou J, Gu Y, Qian C, Lin Y, Liu X, Huang M, et al. Circular RNA circMTO1 acts as the sponge of microRNA-9 to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology. 2017;66:1151–1164. doi: 10.1002/hep.29270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yu J, Xu QG, Wang ZG, Yang Y, Zhang L, Ma JZ, Sun SH, Yang F, Zhou WP. Circular RNA cSMARCA5 inhibits growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;68:1214–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen X, Chen RX, Wei WS, Li YH, Feng ZH, Tan L, Chen JW, Yuan GJ, Chen SL, Guo SJ, et al. PRMT5 circular RNA promotes metastasis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder through sponging miR-30c to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:6319–6330. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen Y, Yang F, Fang E, Xiao W, Mei H, Li H, Li D, Song H, Wang J, Hong M, et al. Circular RNA circAGO2 drives cancer progression through facilitating HuR-repressed functions of AGO2-miRNA complexes. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:1346–1364. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0220-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weng W, Wei Q, Toden S, Yoshida K, Nagasaka T, Fujiwara T, Cai S, Qin H, Ma Y, Goel A. Circular RNA ciRS-7-A promising prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:3918–3928. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, Maier L, Mackowiak SD, Gregersen LH, Munschauer M. et al: Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495:333–338. doi: 10.1038/nature11928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu S, Li X, Lin Z, Su L, Yan S, Zhao B, Miao J. SEC-induced activation of ANXA7 GTPase suppresses prostate cancer metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2018;416:11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li Y, Zheng F, Xiao X, Xie F, Tao D, Huang C, Liu D, Wang M, Wang L, Zeng F, Jiang G. CircHIPK3 sponges miR-558 to suppress heparanase expression in bladder cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:1646–1659. doi: 10.15252/embr.201643581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li M, Liu Y, Zhang X, Liu J, Wang P. Transcriptomic analysis of high-throughput sequencing about circRNA, lncRNA and mRNA in bladder cancer. Gene. 2018;677:189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eke I, Cordes N. Focal adhesion signaling and therapy resistance in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;31:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chou CH, Shrestha S, Yang CD, Chang NW, Lin YL, Liao KW, Huang WC, Sun TH, Tu SJ, Lee WH, et al. miRTarBase update 2018: A resource for experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D296–D302. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yao Y, Chen X, Yang H, Chen W, Qian Y, Yan Z, Liao T, Yao W, Wu W, Yu T, et al. Hsa_circ_0058124 promotes papillary thyroid cancer tumorigenesis and invasiveness through the NOTCH3/GATAD2A axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:318. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1321-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wu K, Liao X, Gong Y, He J, Zhou JK, Tan S, Pu W, Huang C, Wei YQ, Peng Y. Circular RNA F-circSR derived from SLC34A2-ROS1 fusion gene promotes cell migration in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:98. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1028-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang L, Long H, Zheng Q, Bo X, Xiao X, Li B. Circular RNA circRHOT1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by initiation of NR2F6 expression. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:119. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1046-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Soonthornvacharin S, Rodriguez-Frandsen A, Zhou Y, Galvez F, Huffmaster NJ, Tripathi S, Balasubramaniam VR, Inoue A, de Castro E, Moulton H, et al. Systems-based analysis of RIG-I-dependent signalling identifies KHSRP as an inhibitor of RIG-I receptor activation. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:17022. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kristensen LS, Hansen TB, Veno MT, Kjems J. Circular RNAs in cancer: Opportunities and challenges in the field. Oncogene. 2018;37:555–565. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liang WC, Wong CW, Liang PP, Shi M, Cao Y, Rao ST, Tsui SK, Waye MM, Zhang Q, Fu WM, Zhang JF. Translation of the circular RNA circβ-catenin promotes liver cancer cell growth through activation of the Wnt pathway. Genome Biol. 2019;20:84. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1685-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Braicu C, Zimta AA, Gulei D, Olariu A, Berindan-Neagoe I. Comprehensive analysis of circular RNAs in pathological states: Biogenesis, cellular regulation, and therapeutic relevance. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76:1559–1577. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03016-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vo JN, Cieslik M, Zhang Y, Shukla S, Xiao L, Zhang Y, Wu YM, Dhanasekaran SM, et al. The landscape of circular RNA in cancer. Cell. 2019;176:869–881.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xie F, Li Y, Wang M, Huang C, Tao D, Zheng F, Zhang H, Zeng F, Xiao X, Jiang G. Circular RNA BCRC-3 suppresses bladder cancer proliferation through miR-182-5p/p27 axis. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:144. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0892-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu ZQ, Yang MG, Liu HJ, Su CQ. Circular RNA hsa_ circ_0003221 (circPTK2) promotes the proliferation and migration of bladder cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119:3317–3325. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Song C, Li D, Liu H, Sun H, Liu Z, Zhang L, Hu Y. The competing endogenous circular RNA ADAMTS14 suppressed hepatocellular carcinoma progression through regulating microRNA-572/regulator of calcineurin 1. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:2460–2470. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Subramani D, Alahari SK. Integrin-mediated function of Rab GTPases in cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:312. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peng JM, Bera R, Chiou CY, Yu MC, Chen TC, Chen CW, Wang TR, Chiang WL, Chai SP, Wei Y. et al: Actin cytoskeleton remodeling drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition for hepatoma invasion and metastasis in mice. Hepatology. 2018;67:2226–2243. doi: 10.1002/hep.29678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ohishi T, Yoshida H, Katori M, Migita T, Muramatsu Y, Miyake M, Ishikawa Y, Saiura A, Iemura SI, Natsume T, Seimiya H. Tankyrase-binding protein TNKS1BP1 regulates actin cytoskeleton rearrangement and cancer cell invasion. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2328–2338. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schlienger S, Ramirez RA, Claing A. ARF1 regulates adhesion of MDA-MB-231 invasive breast cancer cells through formation of focal adhesions. Cell Signal. 2015;27:403–415. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Meng F, Saxena S, Liu Y, Joshi B, Wong TH, Shankar J, Foster LJ, Bernatchez P, Nabi IR. The phospho-caveolin-1 scaffolding domain dampens force fluctuations in focal adhesions and promotes cancer cell migration. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:2190–2201. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e17-05-0278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Petry IB, Fieber E, Schmidt M, Gehrmann M, Gebhard S, Hermes M, Schormann W, Selinski S, Freis E, Schwender H. et al: ERBB2 induces an antiapoptotic expression pattern of Bcl-2 family members in node-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:451–460. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Junttila TT, Laato M, Vahlberg T, Söderström KO, Visakorpi T, Isola J, Elenius K. Identification of patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder overexpressing ErbB2, ErbB3, or specific ErbB4 isoforms: Real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis in estimation of ErbB receptor status from cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:5346–5357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Groenendijk FH, de Jong J, Fransen van de Putte EE, Michaut M, Schlicker A, Peters D, Velds A, Nieuwland M, van den Heuvel MM, Kerkhoven RM, et al. ERBB2 mutations characterize a subgroup of muscle-invasive bladder cancers with excellent response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Urol. 2016;69:384–388. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu G, Huang K, Jie Z, Wu Y, Chen J, Chen Z, Fang X, Shen S. CircFAT1 sponges miR-375 to promote the expression of Yes-associated protein 1 in osteosarcoma cells. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:170. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0917-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang J, Zhang J, Qiu W, Zhang J, Li Y, Kong E, Lu A, Xu J, Lu X. MicroRNA-1231 exerts a tumor suppressor role through regulating the EGFR/PI3K/AKT axis in glioma. J Neurooncol. 2018;139:547–562. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2903-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhou C, Yu Q, Chen L, Wang J, Zheng S, Zhang J. A miR-1231 binding site polymorphism in the 3′UTR of IFNAR1 is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility. Gene. 2012;507:95–98. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.06.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mao XP, Zhang LS, Huang B, Zhou SY, Liao J, Chen LW, Qiu SP, Chen JX. Mir-135a enhances cellular proliferation through post-transcriptionally regulating PHLPP2 and FOXO1 in human bladder cancer. J Transl Med. 2015;13:86. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0438-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Huang C, Liao X, Jin H, Xie F, Zheng F, Li J, Zhou C, Jiang G, Wu XR, Huang C. MEG3, as a competing endogenous RNA, binds with miR-27a to promote PHLPP2 protein translation and impairs bladder cancer invasion. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;16:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementay_Data.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES