Skip to main content
Pediatric Reports logoLink to Pediatric Reports
. 2019 Sep 30;11(3):8206. doi: 10.4081/pr.2019.8206

Novel mutations in NOTCH2 gene in infants with neonatal cholestasis

Eliana Shaul 1, Debora Kogan-Liberman 2, Stephanie Schuckalo 3, Dominique Jan 4, Michelle Ewart 5, Trang Nguyen 2, Mercedes Martinez 6, Nadia Ovchinsky 2,3,✉
PMCID: PMC6778839  PMID: 31595186

Abstract

One cause of neonatal cholestasis (NC) is paucity of intrahepatic bile ducts which can be associated with Alagille syndrome or non- syndromic. Alagille syndrome is caused by autosomal dominant mutations in the Notch signaling pathway ligand Jagged1 in 94% of patients and mutations in the NOTCH2 receptor in <1% of patients. This is a retrospective case series studying infants with neonatal cholestasis found to have variants of unknown significance (VOUS) in NOTCH2. Sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT) and polymorphism phenotyping (PolyPhen) were utilized to predict a damaging effect. Five infants with NC without other features of Alagille syndrome were found to have one copy of a VOUS in NOTCH2, predicted to be damaging by SIFT and PolyPhen. Our cases support the notion that NOTCH2 mutations may result in hypoplastic biliary system. Further characterization of these variants is important to assist with our clinical approach to NC.

Key words: Paucity of intrahepatic bile ducts, NOTCH2, Neonatal Cholestasis

Introduction

Impaired flow and excretion of bile in the newborn period results in accumulation of biliary components and leads to neonatal cholestasis (NC).1 Paucity of intrahepatic bile ducts (PIBD) is one cause of NC and can be part of a an autosomal dominant familial cholestatic syndrome called Alagille Syndrome (ALGS)2 or can be nonsyndromic. 3 In 94% of patients with ALGS, mutations in the gene for the Notch signaling pathway ligand Jagged1 (JAG1) are found. Furthermore, mutations in NOTCH2, a receptor in the Notch signaling have been found in patients with ALGS.4 We report 5 patients, including 2 siblings (patients 1&2), with NC without any other features of ALGS, who were found to have novel variants of unknown significance (VOUS) in the NOTCH2 gene.

Methods

This is a retrospective case series of 5 patients with NC. Data was obtained through a chart review, including electronic medical records, imaging and pathology specimens. Genetic testing for known pediatric cholestatic disorders was done via Emory Genetics Laboratory (EGL) Genetic Cholestasis Panel. Direct sequencing of the amplified captured regions was performed using next generation short base pair read sequencing (NGS). Exons with inadequate quality or coverage by NGS were assessed with Sanger sequencing. We utilized sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT) and polymorphism phenotyping (PolyPhen), which are silico bioinformatic tools that predict the likelihood of pathogenicity of missense variants.5 SIFT predicts whether an amino acid substitution is likely to affect protein function based on sequence homology and similarity between the alternate amino acids and then predicts if the amino acid change is either ‘tolerated’ or ‘deleterious’. PolyPhen-2 predicts the effect of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of a protein using sequence homology, 3D structures where available, and a number of other databases and tools and then provides a qualitative prediction of ‘probably damaging’, ‘possibly damaging’, ‘benign’ or ‘unknown’. This study was deemed exempt by The Albert Einstein College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Case Report

Five male infants with NC between the age of 2 and 8 weeks were found to have one copy of VOUS in NOTCH 2 gene (Table 1). None of the infants had known risk factors for cholestasis. They all presented with jaundice, acholic stools and without growth failure. Patients 1 and 2 were siblings with identical mutations. Liver biopsy was done in 3 patients demonstrating paucity of bile ducts in 2 patients (Figure 1) and mild ductular proliferation in the third. In all patients SIFT predicted the mutations to be deleterious and PolyPhen predicted them to be probably damaging. Further workup for other features of ALGS, including an echocardiogram, eye exam and X-Ray of the spine, were all within normal limits. Additionally, workup for common etiologies of NC including infectious, anatomic, metabolic, and genetic etiologies was unremarkable. All patients demonstrated improvement in liver disease over time and remain asymptomatic.

Discussion

NC is caused by diminished flow and excretion of bile.1 Symptoms typically include jaundice, dark urine, acholic stools and hepatomegaly. Cholestasis can occur due to infectious, genetic, anatomic and metabolic causes, generally caused by impairment of hepatobiliary transport, intermediary metabolism, storage disorders or bile duct dysgenesis.6 PIBD is one cause of NC and is defined by a specimen from a liver biopsy shows a loss of intrahepatic bile ducts in more than 50% of portal tracts in a specimen that contains at least 10 portal tracts.7 PIBD can be part of a genetic syndrome, ALGS or can caused other rare metabolic diseases, infections such as CMV, or can be idiopathic non-syndromic paucity.2,3 A liver biopsy in patients with ALGS typically demonstrates paucity of the intrahepatic bile ducts, however in newborns with ALGS, bile duct paucity is not always present and instead ductal proliferation can be found.8 The diagnosis of ALGS requires the presence of bile duct paucity with three of five major clinical features including liver disease, vertebral abnormalities, congenital heart defects, ocular anomalies and characteristic facial features.9 ALGS is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder with highly variable expressivity, therefore the disease penetration and severity of the affected organs can vary significantly. 10

Notch pathway interactions are critical for determination of cell fates and differentiation in early development. The Notch system includes of four transmembrane Notch receptors (Notch 1, 2, 3, 4) and two types of ligands Jagged (Jag 1, 2) or Deltalike (Dll 1, 3, 4). The Notch pathway is involved in several stages of bile duct morphogenesis including in the expression of cholangiocytes-specific markers committing cells to the biliary lineage.11

In 94% with ALGS, mutations in JAG1 are found,4 while mutations in NOTCH2 have been described in in a small number of patients who met diagnostic criteria for ALGS without JAG1 mutations.9,12 In one study, Kamath et al describe a cohort of JAG1-negative individuals with clinical features suggestive of ALGS screened for NOTCH2 mutations. Eight patients with a NOTCH2 mutations were identified and only three met classic criteria for ALGS. Of the remaining five individuals, four had two typical ALGS diagnostic features and one patient had bile duct paucity with no other syndromic features.13 This study found that in their patients the variety of clinical features associated with NOTCH2 mutations differed from JAG1 mutations, with a lower prevalence of butterfly vertebrae and facial features.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Patient Age (weeks) Presenting symptoms Total/direct bilirubin, mg/dL Gamma-glutamyl transferase, U/L Abdominal ultrasound HIDA Scan Cholangiogram Liver Biopsy NOTCH2 Mutation
1 3 Jaundice, acholic stools 6.1/3.4 222 Normal liver size and echotexture. No dilated intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts. Gallbladder present. No gall bladder or bowel uptake after 24 hours Intra-operative cholangiogram: Patent intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary system Paucity of bile ducts and mild ductular proliferation NOTCH2 VOUS c.5314G>A (p.E1772K)
2 8 Jaundice, acholic stools 6.7/4.5 638 Mild hepatomegaly with contracted but present gallbladder No gall bladder or bowel uptake after 24 hours Percutaneous cholangiogram: Patent intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary system Paucity of bile ducts NOTCH2 VOUS c.5314G>A (p.E1772K)
3 2 Jaundice, acholic stools, feeding difficulty 10/2.5 296 Normal liver size and echotexture. No dilated intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts. Gallbladder present. Prompt and homogeneous radiotracer uptake in the liver with prompt excretion into the bowel Not done Not done NOTCH2 VOUS c.1847G>T (p.C616F)
4 4 Jaundice, acholic stools, hepatomegaly 4.6/0.9 224 Normal liver size and echotexture. No dilated intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts. Gallbladder present. Not done Not done Not done NOTCH2 VOUS c.2102T>A (p.C701E)
5 2 Jaundice, acholic stools 5.7/4.8 217 Normal liver in size and echogenicity. Gallbladder was not visualized. Prompt and homogeneous radiotracer uptake in the liverwith prompt excretion into the bowel Not done Mild ductular proliferation NOTCH2 VOUS c.4699C>T (p.R1567W)

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Histological findings demonstrating PIBD in patient 1. A) Portal area with mid chronic inflammation with visible hepatic artery branch and portal vein branches without any native bile ducts. There are surrounding giant cell transformation of hepatocytes. B) Another portal area showing hepatic artery and portal vein without a native bile duct.

Conclusions

These five patients, along with one patient described by Kamath et al., suggest that NOTCH2 mutations may be related to isolated NC or PIBD without other features of ALGS. Since the Notch pathway is involved in bile duct morphogenesis, these cases stipulate that NOTCH2 mutations may result in hypoplastic biliary system and intrahepatic bile duct paucity. Furthermore, this series suggests that NOTCH2 mutations may provide the genetic basic to explain the clinical finding in infants with isolated neonatal cholestasis without other features of ALGS. It is also crucial to consider that the highly variable expression and reduced penetrance seen with ALGS could be influencing clinical presentation seen in our patients. Screening for NOTCH2 mutations in patients with NC is warranted and in those with PIBD even if they only fulfil partial criteria for ALGS. Validation of these finding in a larger human cohort and further characterization of the NOTCH2 variants in an animal model is especially important to understand the clinical application of these results. Further investigation will need to be done in order to determine whether these NOTCH2 variants are truly deleterious as the current data presented are insufficient to determine causality of these variants in neonatal cholestasis. Increasing availability of genetic testing and ability to link the clinical finding with previously unrecognized mutations provide a platform for more precise and less invasive approach to achieve a diagnosis in this vulnerable population.

Funding Statement

Funding: none.

References

  • 1.Feldman AG, Sokol RJ. Neonatal cholestasis. Neoreviews 2013;14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zahmatkeshan M, Geramizadeh B, Haghighat M, Enteshari H. Paucity of Intrahepatic Bile Ducts in Neonates: the First Case Series from Iran. Iran J Pediatrics 2013;23:65-70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kenny AP, Crimmins NA, Mackay DJ, et al. Concurrent course of transient neonatal diabetes with cholestasis and paucity of interlobular bile ducts: A case report. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2009;12:417-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McDaniell R, Warthen DM, Sanchez- Lara PA, et al. NOTCH2 mutations cause Alagille syndrome, a heterogeneous disorder of the notch signaling pathway. Am J Hum Genet 2006;79:169-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Flanagan SE, Patch AM, Ellard S. Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010;14:533-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Suchy FJ. Neonatal cholestasis. Pediatr Rev 2004;25:388-96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Suchy FJ. Clinical problems with developmental anomalies of the biliary tract. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2003;14:156-64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saleh M, Kamath BM, Chitayat D. Alagille syndrome: clinical perspectives. Appl Clin Genet 2016;9:75-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Piccoli DA, Spinner NB. Alagille syndrome and the Jagged1 gene. Semin Liver Dis 2001;21:525-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kamath BM, Bason L, Piccoli DA, et al. Consequences of JAG1 mutations. J Med Genet 2003;40:891-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morell CM, Strazzabosco M. Notch signaling and new therapeutic options in liver disease. J Hepatol 2014;60:885-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guegan K, Stals K, Day M, et al. JAG1 mutations are found in approximately one third of patients presenting with only one or two clinical features of Alagille syndrome. Clin Genet 2012;82:33-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kamath BM, Bauer RC, Loomes KM, et al. NOTCH2 mutations in Alagille syndrome. J Med Genet 2012;49:138- [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pediatric Reports are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES