Correction to: Nutrition & Diabetes
10.1038/s41387-019-0089-6 published online 08 August 2019
Since publication of this article the authors noted that the legend for Table 1 was incomplete, as the subtitle was missing. The complete table should appear as given below:
Table 1.
Physical activity and daily energy-, macronutrient- and glycemic load intake during caloric restriction, zero energy balance and overfeeding with low, medium and high energy turnover (ET)
| Caloric restriction | Energy balance | Overfeeding | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low ET | Med ET | High ET | Low ET | Med ET | High ET | Low ET | Med ET | High ET | |
| Physical acticity | |||||||||
| PAL | 1.26 ± 0.06 | 1.52 ± 0.05 | 1.74 ± 0.07 | 1.30 ± 0.03 | 1.57 ± 0.04 | 1.75 ± 0.05 | 1.34 ± 0.05 | 1.55 ± 0.04 | 1.71 ± 0.05 |
| Steps [counts/d] | 545 ± 902 | 17 618 ± 557 | 34 527 ± 1847 | 464 ± 912 | 17 710 ± 219 | 34 414 ± 1539 | 436 ± 847 | 17 790 ± 382 | 34 821 ± 1568 |
| Diet | |||||||||
| Energy intake [kcal/d] | 1 792 ± 144 | 2 156 ± 78 | 2 494 ± 90 | 2 390 ± 97 | 2 863 ± 72 | 3 325 ± 177 | 2 986 ± 99 | 3 570 ± 183 | 4 146 ± 320 |
| CHO intake [g/d] | 219.4 ± 20.8 | 255.1 ± 37.3 | 308.2 ± 12.0 | 292.7 ± 13.9 | 350.1 ± 6.0 | 406.5 ± 20.3 | 366.2 ± 11.8 | 437.2 ± 22.1 | 506.7 ± 37.9 |
| Fat intake [g/d] | 70.5 ± 4.9 | 84.7 ± 2.6 | 97.7 ± 5.0 | 93.7 ± 3.3 | 112.8 ± 3.9 | 131.0 ± 7.5 | 117.3 ± 3.9 | 140.8 ± 7.0 | 163.8 ± 12.5 |
| Protein intake [g/d] | 66.1 ± 4.0 | 79.4 ± 3.3 | 92.0 ± 5.6 | 88.4 ± 0.0 | 106.1 ± 5.6 | 120.3 ± 9.3 | 109.8 ± 3.0 | 131.0 ± 8.6 | 153.3 ± 13.0 |
| Glycemic load [g/d] | 124.0 ± 8.9 | 149.2 ± 4.7 | 173.8 ± 7.0 | 166.0 ± 6.5 | 197.8 ± 5.7 | 228.9 ± 14.1 | 206.4 ± 7.0 | 247.4 ± 13.0 | 285.9 ± 24.0 |
Values are means ± SDs; n = 16; linear mixed model with multiple contrast tests, results of physical activity were compared at the same level of ET between all energy balance conditions (all p > 0.05) and within all energy balances conditions at three levels of ET (all significantly different at p < 0.001); results of dietary intake were compared at the same level of ET between all energy balance conditions (all significantly different at p < 0.001) and within all energy balances conditions at three levels of ET (all significantly different at p < 0.001); ET, energy turnover; CHO, carbohydrate
This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.