Abstract
We studied how Ca2+ influx through different subtypes of Ca2+ channels couples to release at a calyx-type terminal in the rat medial nucleus of the trapezoid body by simultaneously measuring the presynaptic Ca2+ influx evoked by a single action potential and the EPSC. Application of subtype-specific toxins showed that Ca2+ channels of the P/Q-, N-, and R-type controlled glutamate release at a single terminal. The Ca2+influx through the P/Q-type channels triggered release more effectively than Ca2+ influx through N- or R-type channels. We investigated mechanisms that contributed to these differences in effectiveness. Electrophysiological experiments suggested that individual release sites were controlled by all three subtypes of Ca2+ channels. Immunocytochemical staining indicated, however, that a substantial fraction of N- and R-type channels was located distant from release sites. Although these distant channels contributed to the Ca2+ influx into the terminal, they may not contribute to release. Taken together, the results suggest that the Ca2+ influx into the calyx via N- and R-type channels triggers release less effectively than that via P/Q-type because a substantial fraction of the N- and R-type channels in the calyx is localized distant from release sites.
Keywords: Ca2+ channels, presynaptic, calyx of Held, voltage clamp, antibody, immunocytochemistry, P-type Ca2+ channels, N-type Ca2+channels, R-type Ca2+ channels, synaptotagmin, fura-2, rat
Fast neurotransmitter release depends strongly on the extracellular Ca2+concentration (Dodge and Rahamimoff, 1967; Katz, 1969). By changing the Ca2+ influx through all presynaptic Ca2+ channels, a quantitative estimate of the relation between intracellular Ca2+ concentration at the release sites ([Casite]) and release may be obtained. This relation is often approximated by:
Equation 1 |
where n is between 3 and 4 (for review, see Wu and Saggau, 1997).
Ca2+ channel subtypes have been classified as T-, L-, N-, P-, Q-, and R-type on the basis of their different pharmacological and biophysical properties (Dunlap et al., 1995). Different Ca2+ channel subtypes have different pore-forming α1 subunits. The α1A subunits form P/Q-type, α1B subunits form N-type, and α1E subunits form R-type Ca2+ channels (Dunlap et al., 1995). Most of these Ca2+ channel subtypes can be blocked by specific toxins. These toxins have a high affinity for Ca2+ channels and presumably unbind from Ca2+ channels much slower than inorganic Ca2+ channel blockers such as Cd2+ (Yoshikami et al., 1989; Mintz et al., 1995). The toxins can be used to measure the contribution of the different channel subtypes to transmitter release. If both the volume-averaged presynaptic Ca2+ concentration ([Caterminal]) and release are monitored in experiments in which a Ca2+ channel subtype is specifically blocked, an estimate for the effectiveness (m) of that subtype in controlling transmitter release (Wu and Saggau, 1997) can be obtained from:
Equation 2 |
Relations 1 and 2 have a similar format but different physical meanings. The parameter m is defined here as a measure of how effectively Ca2+ influx into a terminal via a particular subtype of Ca2+ channels triggers release. The parameter n, most likely, is a measure of the cooperative binding of intracellular Ca2+ to the Ca2+ sensor at a release site (Dodge and Rahamimoff, 1967).
The values of m for different subtypes of Ca2+ channels may differ in single terminals and can be different from n (Mintz et al., 1995; Wu et al., 1998). These differences may provide information about the spatial organization of release sites and Ca2+ channels. For example, if each release site is controlled by the Ca2+ domain near a single open Ca2+ channel, reducing the number of active Ca2+ channels by applying a channel subtype-specific toxin will cause a linear reduction of release, resulting inm = 1 (Yoshikami et al., 1989; Augustine et al., 1991). However, evidence suggests that multiple Ca2+channels contribute to release in a single release site in many central synapses (Mintz et al., 1995; Borst and Sakmann, 1996, 1999; Wu and Saggau, 1997). When a release site is controlled by multiple Ca2+ channels, several mechanisms may be responsible for different values of m. As an example, assume that two subtypes of Ca2+ channels (types 1 and 2), with each contributing one half of the total Ca2+ influx, are present in a terminal with two release sites. If the channel subtypes are completely segregated, with one subtype being present exclusively on the first release site and the other one only on the second, blocking one subtype of Ca2+ channels will reduce both Ca2+ influx and release by half, meaning thatm for both subtypes would be only 1. The value mthus depends on the distribution of a subtype of Ca2+ channels at different release sites (Mintz et al., 1995; Reid et al., 1998; see ). An alternative mechanism applies when type 1 Ca2+ channels are located so far from the release sites that they do not contribute to release. In that case, m is zero for type 1 and infinity for type 2 channels when these channel types are blocked. If type 1 Ca2+channels are, on average, more distantly located from the release sites than type 2 channels, m for type 1 will be lower than for type 2. Thus, m also depends on the distance between the channel and the release sites (Artalejo et al., 1994).
Here, we investigated mechanisms underlying differences in mof Ca2+ channel subtypes at the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) (Wu et al., 1998). In contrast to other studies that determined the effectiveness of a Ca2+channel subtype from a population of synapses (Wu and Saggau, 1994;Mintz et al., 1995), we measured m by simultaneously recording the presynaptic Ca2+ influx and release at single synapses (Wu et al., 1998). Because of the large size of the presynaptic calyx, the subcellular distribution of different subtypes of Ca2+ channels can be studied with immunocytochemical techniques (Westenbroek et al., 1992, 1995; Yokoyama et al., 1995). We found that transmitter release from the calyx was controlled by P/Q-, N-, and R-type channels. However, the effectiveness of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels was higher than of N- and R-type channels. This difference was most likely caused by a larger fraction of N- and R-type than P/Q-type channels being located distant from release sites.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Slices were cut from the brainstems of 8- to 10-d-old Wistar rats, transferred to a recording chamber and perfused at room temperature (23–24°C) with a solution containing (in mm): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 25 dextrose, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 0.4 ascorbic acid, 3myo-inositol, 2 sodium pyruvate, and 25 NaHCO3, pH 7.4, when bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (Borst et al., 1995). Whole-cell current-clamp recordings from terminals were made with an AxoClamp-2B (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) amplifier and glass pipettes (8–12 MΩ) containing (in mm): 115 potassium gluconate, 20 KCl, 4 MgATP, 10 Na2-phosphocreatine, 0.3 GTP, 10 HEPES, and 0.05 fura-2 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), pH 7.2, adjusted with KOH. Apart from serving as a Ca2+ indicator, the fura-2 fluorescence was also used at the end of the experiment to confirm the presynaptic origin of the recording. Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings from postsynaptic cells were made with an Axopatch-200A amplifier. Pipettes had a resistance of 1.5–2 MΩ and were filled with the same solution as the pipettes used for presynaptic recordings, except they contained 0.5 mm EGTA instead of 50 μm fura-2. Series resistance in postsynaptic recordings (<15 MΩ) was always compensated to 98% (lag, 10 μsec).
Whole-cell Ca2+ current recordings from terminals were made with an Axopatch-200A amplifier (Axon Instruments) and pipettes with a resistance of 4–6 MΩ that contained the same intracellular solution as used for current-clamp recordings except that potassium was replaced by cesium. In addition, 1 μmtetrodotoxin and 0.1 mm 3,4-diaminopyridine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were added to the extracellular solution, and 20 mm NaCl was replaced with 20 mmtetraethylammonium chloride (Sigma) to block sodium and potassium channels (Borst et al., 1995). Series resistance (<35 MΩ) compensation was set at 90% with a lag of 10 μsec, and prediction was set at 60%. Subtraction of the passive response was by the P/-5 method. Terminals with a capacitance of <35 pF were selected to avoid long axons (Borst and Sakmann, 1998). For the waveform command, we used the presynaptic action potential displayed in Figure 2A of Borst et al., 1995, interpolated to 20 μsec per point with a cubic spline. Potentials were corrected for a liquid junction potential of −11 mV between the extracellular and the pipette solution. Holding potential in voltage-clamp experiments was −80 mV. Potentials or currents were low-pass filtered at 2–5 kHz and digitized at 20–50 kHz with a 16-bit analog-to-digital converter (Instrutech, Great Neck, NY).
The optical recording system comprised an upright epifluorescence microscope (Axioskop; Achroplan 40×, NA 0.75, Zeiss), equipped with a polychromatic illumination system (TILL Photonics, Munich, Germany), a dichroic mirror (400 nm), a long-pass (415 nm) emission filter, and two photodiodes at the image plane for signal and background subtraction, respectively. Excitation light was coupled to the microscope via a light guide. Fura-2 measurements of Ca2+ concentration were made by forming ratios between two continuous recordings (100–500 msec) of fluorescence (after background subtraction) at two excitation wavelengths (357 and 380 nm) with an interval of ∼10 msec (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985). Calibration parameters were obtained from in vivocalibrations as described in Helmchen et al. (1997). Fluorescence signals recorded by the photodiode (Hamamatsu) were filtered at 30 Hz (8-pole Bessel filter). Since the Ca2+ transient evoked by an action potential decays with a time constant >400 msec in the presence of 50 μm fura-2 (Helmchen et al., 1997), filtering this transient at 30 Hz did not affect the measurement of its amplitude. Fura-2 was far from saturation during single action potentials, because (1) the peak Ca2+ concentrations evoked by single action potentials were usually less than theKd (273 nm) of fura-2 measuredin vivo (Helmchen et al., 1997), and (2) paired-pulse action potential stimulation (interval: 50 msec) caused approximately the same Ca2+ influx for each action potential (data not shown). The large Ca2+ influx during a presynaptic action potential (Borst and Sakmann, 1996) and the favorable surface-to-volume ratio of the terminal permitted us to resolve Ca2+ influx during single action potentials, and to measure the relation between release and presynaptic Ca2+ influx at the level of a single synapse.
For simultaneous presynaptic and postsynaptic recordings, only synapses in which the postsynaptic cells discharged an action potential in response to afferent stimulation were selected for recording (Borst et al., 1995). Single afferent stimuli were applied via a bipolar electrode (3–30 V, 100 μsec) placed at the midline of the trapezoid body. Stimulation interval was 20–30 sec, which is sufficiently long to avoid synaptic depression (Von Gersdorff et al., 1997).
The degree of reduction in the presynaptic Ca2+ influx and release during application of a toxin was evaluated after its effect reached equilibrium. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. ω-Agatoxin-IVA (Aga) was a gift from Dr. N. A. Saccomano, Pfizer, Groton, CT; ω-conotoxin-GVIA (Ctx) was purchased from Bachem (Bubendorf, Germany) and Research Biochemicals (Natick, MA); and ω-conotoxin-MVIIC was from Research Biochemicals. The toxins were applied in the presence of 0.1 mg/ml cytochrome C to block nonspecific binding sites. Cytochrome C did not significantly affect the EPSC (n = 16; p > 0.5), or Δ[Ca2+] (n = 3; p > 0.5; paired t test).
For the immunocytochemical studies, 10-d-old Wistar rats were anesthetized with Nembutal and then intracardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in PB (0.1 m sodium phosphate, pH 7.4) containing 0.34% l-lysine and 0.05% sodiumm-periodate (McLean and Nakane, 1974). The brains were removed immediately from the cranium, post-fixed for 2 hr, and then cryoprotected by sinking in 10 (w/v) and 30% (w/v) sucrose in PB at 4°C for 72 hr. Coronal sections (40 μm) were cut on a sliding microtome and processed for immunocytochemistry using the avidin–biotin complex method.
Free-floating sections were processed for immunocytochemistry by rinsing the tissue in 0.1 m Tris buffer (TB) for 15 min, 0.1 m Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 15 min, blocking in 2% avidin in TBS for 30 min, rinsing in TBS for 30 min, blocking in 2% biotin in TBS for 30 min, and rinsing in TBS for 30 min. The tissue was then incubated in affinity-purified anti-peptide antibody anti-CNA5 (against α1A subunit, diluted 1:15), anti-CNB2 (against α1B subunit, diluted 1:15), or anti-CNE2 (against α1E subunit, diluted 1:15) simultaneously with anti-synaptotagmin (diluted 1:200) for 1 hr at room temperature followed by 36 hr at 4°C. All antibodies were diluted in 0.1m TBS containing 0.075% Triton X-100 and 1% normal goat serum. The sections were rinsed for 1 hr in TBS and then incubated in a solution containing biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (for anti-CNA5, anti-CNB2, or anti-CNE2 antibodies) diluted 1:300 and anti-mouse IgG Texas Red (for anti-synaptotagmin antibody) diluted 1:200 for 1 hr at 37°C. Tissue sections were then rinsed in TBS for 1 hr and incubated in avidin d-fluorescein (diluted 1:300) and anti-mouse IgG Texas Red (diluted 1:200) for 1 hr at 37°C, rinsed in TBS for 10 min, rinsed in TB for 20 min, mounted onto gelatin-coated slides, and then coverslipped using Vectashield.
The immunofluorescent staining was viewed using a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) MRC 600 microscope located in the imaging facility of the W. M. Keck Center for Research in Neural Signaling at the University of Washington. The thickness of optical sections was typically 1 μm. Tissue sections double-labeled for N-type and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels were treated the same as above but were incubated in anti-CNB2 (made in goat; diluted 1:15) and anti-CNA5 (made in rabbit; diluted 1:15), followed by incubation in biotinylated anti-goat IgG (diluted 1:300) and anti-rabbit IgG labeled with Texas Red (diluted 1:200). Sections were then incubated in avidind-fluorescein (diluted 1:300) and anti-rabbit IgG labeled with Texas Red (diluted 1:200) for 1 hr at 37°C. To determine the level of nonspecific staining, some of the control sections were incubated without one or both of the primary antibodies, or replaced by normal rabbit serum. All staining reported here was abolished in the absence of primary antibody. The generation, purification, and characterization of anti-CNA5, anti-CNB2, and anti-CNE2 have been reported previously (Westenbroek et al., 1992; Yokoyama et al., 1995;Sakurai et al., 1996). The anti-synaptotagmin antibody was a generous gift of Dr. Masami Takahashi, Mitsubishi-Kasei Life Sciences Institute, Toyko, Japan (Yoshida et al., 1992).
RESULTS
P/Q-type channels control release effectively
The presynaptic Ca2+ influx and the corresponding EPSCs evoked by single action potentials were simultaneously recorded at single calyx-type synapses. Application of the P/Q-type Ca2+ channel blocker ω-agatoxin-IVA (Aga, 15–200 nm) reduced both the amplitude of the presynaptic Ca2+ influx (Δ[Ca2+]) and the EPSC without significantly affecting the presynaptic resting membrane potential, the shape of the action potential, or the resting intracellular Ca2+concentration (Fig. 1A,B). This effect could not be reversed after >30 min of wash out (data not shown). The relation between the EPSC and the Δ[Ca2+] was nonlinear (Fig. 1C) and could be fit with relation (2), where m = 3.7 ± 0.2 (n = 5 pairs of presynaptic and postsynaptic recordings, Fig.1D). The effect of Aga was dose-dependent. It reached a plateau at 100 nm (Fig. 1E), at which Δ[Ca2+] was reduced to 44 ± 2% (n = 9) and the EPSC was reduced to 3 ± 1% (n = 4). At 30 nm, Aga reduced Δ[Ca2+] to 71 ± 3% (n = 3; Fig. 1E) and the EPSC to 26 ± 5% (n = 6), yielding the value m = 3.9 (log(0.71)/log(0.26)). Similar values (3.3–4.2) of m were obtained at concentrations of 60–200 nm (from data summarized in Fig. 1E). These results suggest that the value of m is independent of the concentration of Aga. The Kd for the block by Aga was ∼30 nm, because at this concentration Aga reached about half-maximal block of the Δ[Ca2+] (Fig.1E).
N-type channels control release less effectively
Addition of the N-type channel blocker ω-conotoxin-GVIA (Ctx) reduced both the Δ[Ca2+] and the EPSC simultaneously (Fig.2A). The membrane potential, the action potential, and the resting intracellular Ca2+ concentration in the terminal did not change significantly (Fig. 2B). The relation between the EPSC and the Δ[Ca2+] could be fit with relation (2) with m = 1.3 ± 0.1 (seven pairs of presynaptic and postsynaptic recordings, Fig. 2C). The value of m obtained with application of Ctx was significantly lower than that with application of Aga (p < 0.01; t test). At 1 μm, Ctx reduced the Δ[Ca2+] to 73 ± 2% (n = 11) and the EPSC to 64 ± 2% (n = 10, Fig. 2D). The effect of Ctx was saturated at 1 μm, since no additional block on either the Δ[Ca2+] (n = 3) or the EPSC (n = 3) was observed at 3 μm (Fig.2D).
We previously observed that combined application of saturating concentrations of ω-conotoxin-MVIIC (8 μm), a blocker of P/Q- and N-type channels (Hillyard et al., 1992; McDonough et al., 1996), Aga (100 nm), and Ctx (1 μm) reduces the Δ[Ca2+] to 26 ± 2% (n = 8) and the EPSC to 0.9 ± 0.2% (n = 4; Wu et al., 1998). Similar results were obtained when Aga and Ctx were applied together in the absence of ω-conotoxin-MVIIC (Wu et al., 1998, see also Fig. 4). The block of Δ[Ca2+] by the combined toxin application was similar to the sum of the block by applying either Aga or Ctx alone, suggesting that Aga and Ctx block separate populations of Ca2+ channels. The resistant Δ[Ca2+] is mediated via R-type channels, which have m = 1.4 ± 0.1 (n = 4 synapses; Wu et al., 1998). Reducing the extracellular Ca2+concentration from 2 to 1 mm results in n = 2.7 ± 0.2 (n = 5 synapses; Wu et al., 1998). Table1 shows the average percentages of the Δ[Ca2+] evoked by single action potentials from three subtypes of Ca2+ channels and their values ofm. The sum of the three components was slightly >100%, probably because of measurement error.
Table 1.
P/Q-type | N-type | R-type | Cooperativity (n) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
% | 56 ± (9) | 27 ± 2 (11) | 26 ± 2 (8) | |
m or n | 3.7 ± 0.2 (5) | 1.3 ± 0.1 (7) | 1.4 ± 0.1 (4) | 2.7 ± 0.2 (5) |
The percentage refers to the presynaptic Δ[Ca2+] evoked by single action potentials. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (number of synapses measured). The m for different subtypes of Ca2+ channels was measured based on relation (2). The n for the cooperativity of the Ca2+ in triggering release was measured by lowering the extracellular Ca2+ concentration (Wu et al., 1998).
The difference in m is not caused by different Ca2+ current kinetics
In the squid giant synapse, broadening presynaptic action potentials increases EPSCs (Augustine et al., 1991). The relation between the EPSC and the presynaptic Ca2+ influx was estimated to be approximately linear from this study, suggesting that during an action potential Ca2+ channel domains do not overlap at this synapse (Augustine et al., 1991). If one subtype of Ca2+ channels opens much more briefly than others, its Ca2+ domains are less likely to overlap. We wondered whether the difference in the values of m at the MNTB synapse could be caused by a difference in the time course of Ca2+ currents. Presynaptic Ca2+currents elicited by an action potential waveform command (ICa(AP)) were recorded in the presence of Na+ and K+ channel blockers (Borst and Sakmann, 1996). Application of Ctx (1 μm) reduced the amplitude of the ICa(AP) to 79 ± 1% (n = 6; Fig. 3A), similar to its inhibitory effect on the Δ[Ca2+] (Fig. 2). This effect was not accompanied by a significant change in the waveform of the current measured at half width (p > 0.5; paired t test; n = 5; Fig. 3B). Similarly, application of ω-conotoxin-MVIIC, a blocker for N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels, revealed no significant difference in the time course of theICa(AP) between the R-type and the total current (Wu et al., 1998). These results suggest that the lower value ofm for N- and R-type channels is not caused by a difference in the kinetics of the ICa(AP).
In addition to studying the time course of theICa(AP), we also examined the currents elicited by 10 msec depolarizing steps from a holding potential of −80 mV. The peak current–voltage (I–V) curves were obtained before and after Ctx application (n = 6; Fig.3C,D). The difference between these twoI–V curves is the Ctx-sensitive N-type current, which activated at potentials more positive than −30 mV (Fig.3C,D), at least 10 mV more positive than the other two subtypes of Ca2+ currents. Ctx (1 μm) inhibited the current elicited at 0 mV to 76 ± 3% (n = 6) of control. A similar block was observed at −10 to 30 mV. These results were similar to the effect of Ctx on Δ[Ca2+] or ICa(AP) (Figs.2, 3).
Multiple subtypes of Ca2+ channels control release at single release sites
Next, we investigated whether the difference in the value ofm could be accounted for by differential distribution of Ca2+ channel subtypes at different release sites. Because Aga blocked 97 ± 1% of the EPSC (Fig.1E), we assumed that P/Q-type channels participate in controlling release at all release sites. In a calyx, about half of the Ca2+ influx is via P/Q-type channels, and the other half is approximately equally divided between N- and R-type channels (Table 1). We investigated three hypotheses that may account for the lower values of m for N- and R-type channels (see introductory remarks). First, N- and R-type channels may be associated with different release sites. Second, N- and R-type channels may be located at every release site, but they may be further from the Ca2+ sensor than P/Q-type channels. Third, there may be distant Ca2+ channels, which are located so far away from release sites that they do not contribute to release during a single action potential. The fraction of distant N- and R-type channels may be larger than that of distant P/Q-type channels.
If N- and R-type channels do not control release at the same release site, the Ca2+ influx at each release site should be contributed about half by P/Q-type channels and half by either N- or R-type channels. This arrangement of Ca2+ channels would result in a lower value of m for N- and R-type channels (Reid et al., 1998; see also for details). It predicts that when P/Q-type channels are completely blocked, blocking N-type channels will reduce release by ≤50%, because only half of release sites are associated with N-type channels. In the presence of Aga (100 nm) to completely block P/Q-type channels, application of Ctx (1 μm) reduced the Δ[Ca2+] by 52 ± 2% (n = 5) of the value immediately before Ctx application (Fig.4), as expected from Table 1. However, Ctx reduced the EPSC by 78 ± 4% (n = 4) of the value immediately before Ctx application, which is clearly higher than the predicted 50%. Thus, the hypothesis that N- and R-type channels are associated with different release sites is not supported. N-type channels are present in at least 78% of release sites. These results suggest that transmitter release at most release sites is controlled by three subtypes of Ca2+ channels, P/Q-, N-, and R-type. As an approximation, we assumed that all three subtypes of channels control release at every release site.
EGTA does not preferentially block release mediated by N-type Ca2+ channels
If N- and R-type channels near release sites were located further from the Ca2+ sensor than P/Q-type channels, the Ca2+ entering via N- or R-type channels is less likely to bind to the Ca2+ sensor than that entering the terminal via P/Q-type channels. This will result in a lower value of m for N- and R-type channels. One prediction of this hypothesis is that the Ca2+ entering via N- or R-type channels will diffuse across a longer distance to reach the Ca2+ sensor, and thus will be more likely to be bound by an exogenous Ca2+ buffer. We tested whether release controlled by the Ca2+ influx through N-type channels is more susceptible to the block by a high concentration of the slow Ca2+ buffer EGTA. EPSCs were recorded while a pipette containing 10 mm EGTA was sealed to the corresponding terminal in the cell-attached configuration. After obtaining a baseline value for the EPSC amplitude, the whole-cell configuration was established in the presynaptic recording. The EPSC decreased to a new steady-state level in ∼3 min (Fig.5A), probably reflecting diffusion of EGTA from the presynaptic pipette into the terminal (Borst and Sakmann, 1996). Application of Ctx (1 μm) further reduced the EPSC by 38 ± 5% (n = 5) of the value at the new steady-state level (Fig. 5A). Ctx blocked a similar fraction of the EPSC in the presence or absence of EGTA (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that calcium ions that reach the Ca2+ sensor diffuse approximately the same distance, irrespective of the subtype of channels through which they enter.
Double labeling with antibodies to Ca2+channels and synaptotagmin
If a larger fraction of N- and R-type channels than P/Q-type channels were located far from release sites, from which Ca2+ entering will be less likely to bind to the Ca2+ sensor that triggers release, the value ofm for N- or R-type will be lower than that for P/Q-type channels. To address this hypothesis, we examined the distribution of Ca2+ channels in the terminal by double labeling with antibodies to Ca2+ channels (Westenbroek et al., 1992, 1995; Yokoyama et al., 1995) and to synaptotagmin, a synaptic vesicle protein (Brose et al., 1992). Confocal microscopic examination of tissue sections labeled with monoclonal antibodies against synaptotagmin (Yoshida et al., 1992) revealed staining that was restricted to the presynaptic calyx terminal enveloping the cell body of MNTB neurons (Fig.6B). In contrast, immunostaining for the α1A subunit of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels (Westenbroek et al., 1995) was localized in punctate clusters in the release face of the calyx-type synapse along the surface of the cell, as well as scattered throughout the postsynaptic cell body (Fig. 6A). Staining in the soma presumably represents newly synthesized P/Q-type channels in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex, which were more prominent in these neurons in young rats than we previously observed in adults (Westenbroek et al., 1995). Merged images showed that staining for α1A was colocalized with staining for synaptotagmin at sites along the release face of the calyx (Fig. 6C,yellow–orange regions). Although some punctate staining of α1A appeared to be in the cytosol of the terminal in a single optical section (about 1 μm), inspection of adjacent sections suggested that it originated from the irregularly shaped release face as well. This staining was carried out using anti-CNA5 antibodies, which recognize the rbA isoform of α1A (Starr et al., 1991; Sakurai et al., 1996). A similar pattern of staining was observed with the anti-CNA6 antibodies against the BI isoform (Mori et al., 1991; Sakurai et al., 1996). Altogether, these results show that many areas of the calyx synapse that were labeled for synaptotagmin were also labeled for both isoforms of the α1A subunits of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels.
Examination of tissue sections labeled with antibodies to α1B subunit of N-type Ca2+ channels revealed staining of this channel along both the release face and the nonrelease face of the calyx, as well as substantial intracellular staining in the cell body of postsynaptic neurons (Fig.6D). N-type Ca2+ channel staining of the calyx was often adjacent to or surrounding the staining observed with anti-synaptotagmin antibodies rather than superimposed on it (Fig.6, compare D, E). Merged images showed areas of superimposition of staining for synaptotagmin and N-type Ca2+ channels (Fig. 6F,yellow–orange staining), but many areas of synaptotagmin staining did not have colocalized N-type Ca2+channels (Fig. 6F, red staining), and many areas of staining for N-type Ca2+ channels were not stained for synaptotagmin (Fig. 6F,bright green staining). Immunostaining for N-type Ca2+ channels was also present along the outer surface of the calyx and appeared to extend along the surface membrane of calyx to areas adjacent to the axon, where no synaptotagmin staining was observed (data not shown).
Antibodies against the α1E subunits of R-type Ca2+ channels were mostly not colocalized with synaptotagmin antibodies (Fig. 6, compare G,H). Merged images show few areas of superimposition of staining for α1E and synaptotagmin (Fig.6I). These R-type channels appeared present primarily along the outer surface of the calyx and only rarely on the inner surface that surrounds the neurons and contains the sites of neurotransmitter release. Staining for α1E also extended to areas adjacent to the axon where no staining for synaptotagmin was observed.
Double-labeling studies using antibodies to N-type and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels revealed distinct distributions of these channels. P/Q-type Ca2+ channels are located in punctate clusters in the calyx membrane (Fig.7B), whereas N-type channels are more diffusely distributed throughout the calyx (Fig.7A). Merging these images shows that N-type Ca2+ channels often are colocalized with P/Q-type channels (Fig. 7C, yellow–orange staining) but also are often located elsewhere in the calyx (Fig. 7C,green staining). The double-labeled images are consistent with the conclusion that N-type Ca2+channels are colocalized with P/Q-type Ca2+ channels in release sites, but are also localized elsewhere in the calyx terminals.
DISCUSSION
We have demonstrated that three classes of Ca2+channels, R- (Wu et al., 1998), P/Q-, and N-type control transmitter release at single release sites in single calyx-type terminals in the rat MNTB. The value of m for P/Q-type channels was higher than for N- and R-type channels, meaning that P/Q-type channels trigger release more effectively than N- and R-type. This difference was not caused by a difference in their kinetic properties or by a greater diffusional distance between the N-type or R-type Ca2+ channels that contributed to transmitter release and the Ca2+ sensor that triggered release. Double immunocytochemical labeling showed that P/Q-type Ca2+ channels containing α1A subunits were colocalized mostly with synaptic vesicle clusters, whereas N-type channels containing α1B and R-type channels containing α1E were only partly colocalized with vesicle clusters. These results suggest that the subcellular distribution of Ca2+ channels within a terminal is one of the factors that determines their effectiveness in triggering release. As summarized in Figure 8, our results are best explained by assuming that a larger fraction of N- and R-type channels are localized distant from release sites. However, within a release site, all three subtypes of channels are localized at a similar distance from the Ca2+ sensor.
Multiple subtypes of Ca2+ channels in the calyx of Held
Takahashi et al. (1996) reported that the majority (96%) of the presynaptic Ca2+ current at the rat MNTB synapse is Aga-sensitive P/Q-type and that Ctx has no effect on the presynaptic Ca2+ current. This is not consistent with our results (Table 1). The rats used by Takahashi et al. (1996) were 8- to 18-d-old, whereas we used 8- to 10-d-old rats. A developmental change of presynaptic Ca2+ channel subtypes in the MNTB (Iwasaki and Takahashi, 1998) might partly account for this discrepancy, although in contrast to our results, Iwasaki and Takahashi (1998) did not observe a contribution of N-type Ca2+channels to synaptic transmission in 10-d-old rats. Several lines of evidence support that three subtypes rather than a single subtype of Ca2+ channels are present in 8- to 10-d-old rats. Aga blocked slightly more than half of the total presynaptic Ca2+ current at 100 nm. Ctx blocked about a quarter of the presynaptic Ca2+ current and ∼35% of the EPSC at saturating concentrations. Ctx from two sources (Bachem and Research Biochemicals) was used, and no significant difference was noticed. The threshold for activation of the Ctx-sensitive current was at least 10 mV more positive than that of the Ctx-insensitive current, indicating that the biophysical properties of the N-type current are different from the Ctx-insensitive current. In addition, the N- and P/Q-type channel blocker ω-conotoxin-MVIIC reaches its maximal effect at 8 μm by blocking about three quarters of the Ca2+ current (Wu et al., 1998), similar to the summed effect of coapplication of Aga and Ctx (Table 1). Coapplication of ω-conotoxin-MVIIC, Aga, and Ctx at saturating concentrations causes a similar effect as applying only ω-conotoxin-MVIIC (Wu et al., 1998). The ω-conotoxin-MVIIC-sensitive current showed a slowly activating component when activated at −30 to −20 mV, whereas ω-conotoxin-MVIIC-insensitive R-type current does not have this component (Wu et al., 1998). This result suggests that the R-type current is kinetically different from other subtypes of currents. Furthermore, immunostaining showed that α1A subunits of P/Q-type, α1B subunits of N-type, and α1Esubunits of R-type Ca2+ channels are mostly or partly localized at the presynaptic release sites. Taken together, the pharmacological evidence shows the presence of three subtypes of Ca2+ channels in a single terminal, which differ in their threshold of activation, current kinetics, and the composition of their α1 subunits.
In neuronal somata, the percentages of different Ca2+ currents evoked by a depolarizing voltage step may be different from that evoked by an action potential (McCobb and Beam, 1991; Scroggs and Fox, 1992). Whether this is also the case in synaptic terminals had previously not been examined. Ctx and ω-conotoxin-MVIIC (Wu et al., 1998) reduced the Ca2+ influx by an action potential to a similar degree as the current evoked by a depolarizing voltage step. These results suggest that none of the three subtypes of Ca2+ channels is preferentially activated by action potentials.
Different effectiveness of Ca2+channel subtypes
If release rates are close to maximal, the relation between Ca2+ influx and release becomes less steep. Blocking a small fraction of Ca2+ channels would then cause a relatively small effect on release and thus cause an apparently smaller effectiveness of Ca2+ channels in controlling release (Turner et al., 1993; Wheeler et al., 1996). Could the low value of m for the N-type or the R-type Ca2+ channels observed in our experiments be caused by saturation of the release process? Because Aga, at 30 nm, gave a similar reduction in Δ[Ca2+], but a much larger reduction in the EPSC than 1 μm Ctx, this possibility is unlikely. When extracellular Ca2+ concentration was reduced from 2 to 1 mm, a large effect on the release was also observed (Wu et al., 1998), again suggesting that at physiological extracellular Ca2+ concentrations, release rates are submaximal.
The value of m for P/Q- and N-type channels has also been measured for populations of other synapses (Wu and Saggau, 1994; Mintz et al., 1995; Qian et al., 1997). The value of m is slightly lower for the N-type (m = 3.5) than for the P/Q-type channels (m = 4.1–4.2) in guinea pig and rat hippocampal synapses (Wu and Saggau, 1994; Qian et al., 1997). This difference is more pronounced (m = 2.5 for the N-type and 4.0 for the P-type) at cerebellar parallel fiber synapses (Mintz et al., 1995). At MNTB synapse the largest difference is in the values ofm for P/Q- and N-type channels (Table 1). Consistent with results in cerebellar and hippocampal synapses, the m for the P/Q-type channels is also the highest in the MNTB synapse and it seems possible that the high m value observed by Mintz et al. (1995) for the P/Q-type channels is related to the presence of toxin-resistant channels with a relatively low effectiveness in the parallel fiber terminals, similar to the situation in the MNTB.
Ca2+ domains caused by the opening of three subtypes of channels are likely to overlap at single release sites at MNTB synapses, consistent with our earlier results (Borst and Sakmann, 1996,1998, 1999) and with results obtained in hippocampal (Wu and Saggau, 1994) and cerebellar (Mintz et al., 1995) synapses. At the MNTB synapse at least three Ca2+ channels, each of a different subtype, can contribute to release of a vesicle in the calyx. Although probably >60 Ca2+ channels open for each vesicle that is released during an action potential (Borst and Sakmann, 1996), a significant fraction of N- and R-type Ca2+channels may be distant channels that do not contribute to release evoked by a single action potential.
Different localization of Ca2+channel subtypes
Double labeling with antibodies to different Ca2+ channel subtypes and to the vesicle protein synaptotagmin provided a direct comparison of localization of Ca2+ channel subtypes and release sites at a nerve terminal. The α1A subunits of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels are highly effective in triggering release and are colocalized in clusters with synaptotagmin, apparently at the release face of the calyx, whereas the α1Bsubunits of N-type and α1E subunits of R-type Ca2+ channels are partly or mostly not colocalized at release sites and P/Q-type channels. The correlation between the effectiveness in triggering release and colocalization with synaptotagmin suggests that Ca2+ channel localization can determine its effectiveness in triggering release.
Given a similar low value of m for N- and R-type channels (Table 1), why does it appear that a larger fraction of α1E subunits of R-type than α1B subunits of N-type Ca2+ channels are not located at release sites? The m value for R-type Ca2+channels was measured using the blocker Ni2+, which reduced presynaptic Ca2+ influx primarily, but not exclusively, by blocking R-type Ca2+ currents (Wu et al., 1998). Thus, the m value measured this way could have been an overestimate. Alternatively, there may be two subtypes of R-type channels (Tottene et al., 1996; Wu et al., 1998), one of which is not recognized by the antibody against the α1E subunit and is located at the release site.
One mechanism contributing to localization of Ca2+channels at release sites is thought to be binding of the synaptic protein interaction (synprint) site on N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels to SNARE proteins (Sheng et al., 1994; Rettig et al., 1996). Disruption of this interaction reduces the effectiveness of Ca2+ entry through N-type channels in triggering transmitter release at cholinergic synapses between pairs of cultured sympathetic ganglion neurons and between cultured motor neurons and muscle cells (Mochida et al., 1996; Rettig et al., 1997). The different localization of Ca2+channels observed here could reflect competition among Ca2+ channel subtypes for localization at release sites, with P/Q-type channels having a higher affinity than N-type or R-type channels for the SNARE complex in the calyx.
Contribution of channel subtypes to transmitter release
This particular arrangement of Ca2+ channel subtypes at terminals may have an important functional impact on various aspects of synaptic transmission. For example, distant Ca2+ channels located far from release sites may contribute little to the local increase in Ca2+concentration that triggers transmitter release (Fig. 8), but may contribute to the residual Ca2+ concentration following an action potential which influences different forms of short-term synaptic plasticity such as paired-pulse facilitation and post-tetanic potentiation (Zucker, 1996). Several neurotransmitters and neuromodulators inhibit transmitter release by modulation of presynaptic Ca2+ channels (Wu and Saggau, 1997). Modulation of the highly effective Ca2+ channel subtypes will have a larger effect on transmitter release, whereas modulation of the less effective channel subtypes will cause a smaller change of transmitter release. Modulation of distant Ca2+ channels will only affect release during high-frequency signaling.
Nonuniform distribution of different subtypes of Ca2+ channels at different release sites leads to a lower value of m
Lowering the extracellular Ca2+ concentration decreases the driving force for the Ca2+ influx through every Ca2+ channel, although there might be minor differences between Ca2+ channel subtypes in their affinity for extracellular Ca2+. Then (= 2.7 ± 0.2; 5 synapses) measured this way (Wu et al., 1998) is likely to reflect the cooperativity of Ca2+ in triggering release (Augustine et al., 1991;Mintz et al., 1995). Thus, we regarded the value of n in each release site as 2.7 (Table 1). Since Aga blocked 97 ± 1% of the EPSC, we assumed that P/Q-type channels contributed to release at all release sites. Table 1 shows the percentage of the presynaptic Ca2+ influx contributed by each subtype of channels. By scaling the measured percentages down by 8%, the sum of three components (mean only) is exactly 100%, which simplified the calculations below. After scaling, P/Q-type channels contributed ∼50% of the total Ca2+ influx, whereas N- and R-type each contributed ∼25%. Thus, 50% of the Ca2+ influx at each release site is contributed by P/Q-type channels. N- and R-type channels share their targeted release sites with P/Q-type channels.
If N- and R-type channels are separated in every release site, P- and N-type channels control release in 50% of release sites, whereas P- and R-type channels control release in the other 50% of release sites. When N-type channels (∼25% of total channels, Table1) are blocked, at 50% of release sites Ca2+ will enter exclusively via P/Q-type channels, and the remaining 50% of release sites will be unaffected. The remaining fraction of release (Releasenormalized) after the block of N-type channels is: Releasenormalized = 50%*(0.52.7) + 50%*(12.7) = 58%. The apparent power can be measured from relation (2), 58% = (1 − 0.25)m,m = 1.9, close to the measured value (m= 1.3 ± 0.1). Similar calculations were made for R-type channels, yielding similar results. This view could account at least partly for the lower values of m (see also Reid et al., 1998).
Footnotes
L.G.W. was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and Human Frontier Science Program. J.G.G.B. was supported by a Training and Mobility of Researchers fellowship. R.E.W. and W.A.C. were supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS22625. We thank Drs. Erwin Neher and Bernard Katz for helpful comments on this manuscript.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Ling-Gang Wu, Abteilung Zellphysiologie, Max-Planck-Institut für medizinische Forschung, Jahnstrasse 29, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
REFERENCES
- 1.Artalejo CR, Adams ME, Fox AP. Three types of Ca2+ channel trigger secretion with different efficacies in chromaffin cells. Nature. 1994;367:72–76. doi: 10.1038/367072a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Augustine GJ, Adler EM, Charlton MP. The calcium signal for transmitter secretion from presynaptic nerve terminals. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1991;635:365–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb36505.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Borst JGG, Sakmann B. Calcium influx and transmitter release in a fast CNS synapse. Nature. 1996;383:431–434. doi: 10.1038/383431a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Borst JGG, Sakmann B. Calcium current during a single action potential in a large presynaptic terminal of the rat brainstem. J Physiol (Lond) 1998;506:143–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.143bx.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Borst JGG, Sakmann B (1999) Effect of changes in action potential shape on calcium currents and transmitter release in a calyx-type synapse of the rat auditory brainstem. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Borst JGG, Helmchen F, Sakmann B. Pre- and postsynaptic whole-cell recordings in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of the rat. J Physiol (Lond) 1995;489:825–840. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp021095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brose N, Petrenko AG, Südhof TC, Jahn R. Synaptotagmin: a calcium sensor on the synaptic vesicle surface. Science. 1992;256:1021–1025. doi: 10.1126/science.1589771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dodge FA, Rahamimoff R. Co-operative action of calcium ions in transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 1967;193:419–432. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dunlap K, Luebke JI, Turner TJ. Exocytotic Ca2+ channels in mammalian central neurons. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:89–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca++ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Helmchen F, Borst JGG, Sakmann B. Calcium dynamics associated with a single action potential in a CNS presynaptic terminal. Biophys J. 1997;72:1458–1471. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78792-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hillyard DR, Monje VD, Mintz I, Bean BP, Nadasdi L, Ramachandran J, Miljanich G, Azimi-Zoonooz A, McIntosh JM, Cruz LJ, Imperial JS, Olivera BM. A new conus peptide ligand for mammalian presynaptic Ca2+ channels. Neuron. 1992;9:69–77. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90221-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Iwasaki S, Takahashi T. Developmental changes in calcium channel types mediating synaptic transmission in rat auditory brainstem. J Physiol (Lond) 1998;509:419–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.419bn.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Katz B. The release of neural transmitter substances. Thomas; Springfield, IL: 1969. [Google Scholar]
- 15.McCobb DP, Beam KG. Action potential waveform voltage-clamp commands reveal striking differences in calcium entry via low and high voltage-activated calcium channels. Neuron. 1991;7:119–127. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90080-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McDonough SI, Swartz KJ, Mintz IM, Boland LM, Bean B. Inhibition of calcium channels in rat central and peripheral neurons by ω-conotoxin MVIIC. J Neurosci. 1996;16:2612–2623. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-08-02612.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McLean IW, Nakane P. Periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde fixative for immunocytochemical microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem. 1974;22:1077–1083. doi: 10.1177/22.12.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mintz I, Sabatini BL, Regehr WG. Calcium control of transmitter release at a cerebellar synapse. Neuron. 1995;15:675–688. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90155-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mochida S, Sheng Z-H, Baker CM, Kobayashi H, Catterall WA. Inhibition of neurotransmission by peptides containing the synaptic protein interaction site of N-type calcium channels. Neuron. 1996;17:781–788. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80209-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mori Y, Friedrich T, Kim M-S, Mikami A, Nakai J, Ruth P, Bosse E, Hofmann F, Flockerzi V, Furuichi T, Mikoshiba K, Imoto K, Tanabe T, Numa S. Primary structure and functional expression from complementary cDNA of a brain calcium channel. Nature. 1991;350:398–402. doi: 10.1038/350398a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Qian J, Colmers WF, Saggau P. Inhibition of synaptic transmission by neuropeptide Y in rat hippocampal area CA1: modulation of presynaptic Ca2+ entry. J Neurosci. 1997;17:8169–8177. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-21-08169.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reid CA, Bekkers J, Clements JD. N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels mediate transmitter release with a similar cooperativity at rat hippocampal autapses. J Neurosci. 1998;18:2849–2855. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-08-02849.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rettig J, Sheng Z-H, Kim DK, Hodson CD, Snutch TP, Catterall WA. Isoform-specific interaction of the α1A subunits of brain calcium channels with the presynaptic proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:7363–7368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rettig J, Heinemann C, Ashery U, Sheng Z-H, Yokoyama CT, Catterall WA, Neher E. Alteration of calcium dependence of neurotransmitter release by disruption of calcium channel/syntaxin interaction. J Neurosci. 1997;17:6647–6656. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-17-06647.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sakurai T, Westenbroek RE, Rettig J, Hell J, Catterall WA. Biochemical properties and subcellular distribution of the BI and rbA isoforms of α1A subunits of brain calcium channels. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:511–528. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.2.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Scroggs RS, Fox AP. Multiple Ca2+ currents elicited by action potential waveforms in acutely isolated adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurosci. 1992;12:1789–1801. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-05-01789.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sheng Z-H, Rettig J, Takahashi M, Catterall WA. Identification of a syntaxin-binding site on N-type calcium channels. Neuron. 1994;13:1303–1313. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90417-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Starr TVP, Prystay W, Snutch TP. Primary structure of a calcium channel that is highly expressed in rat cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:5621–5625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.13.5621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Takahashi T, Forsythe ID, Tsujimoto T, Barnes-Davies M, Onodera K. Presynaptic calcium current modulation by a metabotropic glutamate receptor. Science. 1996;274:594–597. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tottene A, Moretti A, Pietrobon D. Functional diversity of P-type and R-type calcium channels in rat cerebellar neurons. J Neurosci. 1996;16:6353–6363. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-20-06353.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Turner TJ, Adams ME, Dunlap K. Multiple Ca2+ channel types coexist to regulate synaptosomal neurotransmitter release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:9518–9522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Von Gersdorff H, Schneggenburger R, Weis S, Neher E. Presynaptic depression at a calyx synapse: the small contribution of metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Neurosci. 1997;17:8137–8146. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-21-08137.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Westenbroek RE, Hell JW, Warner C, Dubel SJ, Snutch TP, Catterall WA. Biochemical properties and subcellular distribution of an N-type calcium channel α1 subunit. Neuron. 1992;9:1–20. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90069-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Westenbroek RE, Sakurai T, Elliott EM, Hell JW, Starr TVB, Snutch TP, Catterall WA. Immunochemical identification and subcellular distribution of the α1A subunits of brain calcium channels. J Neurosci. 1995;15:6403–6418. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06403.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wheeler DB, Randall A, Tsien RW. Changes in action potential alter reliance of excitatory synaptic transmission on multiple types of Ca2+ channels in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1996;16:2226–2237. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-07-02226.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wu LG, Saggau P. Pharmacological identification of two types of presynaptic voltage-dependent calcium channels at CA3 to CA1 synapses of the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1994;14:5613–5622. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05613.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu LG, Saggau P. Presynaptic inhibition of elicited neurotransmitter release. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:204–212. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)01015-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wu LG, Borst JGG, Sakmann B. R-type Ca2+ currents evoke transmitter release at a rat central synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:4720–4725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yokoyama CT, Westenbroek RE, Hell JW, Soong TW, Snutch TP, Catterall WA. Biochemical properties and subcellular distribution of the neuronal class E calcium channel α1 subunit. J Neurosci. 1995;15:6419–6432. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06419.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yoshida A, Oho C, Omori A, Kuwahara R, Ito T, Takahashi M. HPC-1 is associated with synaptotagmin and ω-conotoxin receptor. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:24925–24928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yoshikami D, Bagabaldo Z, Olivera BM. The inhibitory effects of omega-conotoxins on Ca channels and synapses. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1989;560:230–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb24100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zucker RS. Exocytosis: a molecular and physiological perspective. Neuron. 1996;17:1049–1055. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80238-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]