Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Oct;24(7):750–755. doi: 10.1080/014436104100009428

Assessment of risk factors for stillbirth among pregnant women in Jamaica

GELEN R DEL ROSARIO 1, TERRI LEWIS 1, BERYL IRONS 3, SHEILA CAMPBELL-FORRESTER 3, HEIDI L WEISS 2, PAULINE E JOLLY 1
PMCID: PMC6784823  NIHMSID: NIHMS1053256  PMID: 15763780

Summary

A case – control study was conducted to assess the risk factors of stillbirth among pregnant women in Jamaica. A total of 314 women participated (160 with stillborn babies and 154 with live-born babies). A questionnaire designed to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, antenatal care, medical and sexually transmitted disease (STD) history, method of delivery and infant birth and health status was administered to each woman. Medical records were reviewed to verify medical history. Six variables were found to be significant predictors of stillbirth by multivariate logistic regression. Low birth weight (OR = 4.3, CI = 2.4 – 7.7), complications during pregnancy or delivery (OR = .19, CI = 0.09 – 0.41), method of delivery (caesarean section; OR = 7.2, CI = 1.6 – 33.2), number of living children (OR = 0.54, CI = 0.40 – 0.73), number of antenatal visits (less than three; OR = 2.0, CI = 1.3 – 3.1), and presence of unfavourable and /or adverse fetal outcome (OR = 4.0, CI = 1.8 – 9.2) were found to be associated with stillbirth. These findings have important implications in establishing policies for prenatal care in Jamaica.

Introduction

One of the most widely accepted of indicators of the quality of obstetric and neonatal care of a country is its perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality is defined as the number of stillbirths and neonatal deaths occurring in the first week of life in the population. Like many developing countries, Jamaica has more than three times the rate of perinatal mortality than developed countries (Greenwood et al., 1994a). The rate of perinatal mortality of the country has not decreased since 1963 (Ashley et al., 1994c) and as of 1996 the rate was 31 per 1000 births (Ashley et al., 1994b).

In 1986, the Jamaican Ministry of Health launched a major health survey, the Jamaican Perinatal Mortality Study, to identify the factors associated with perinatal deaths (Ashley et al., 1994c). The survey found that 29% of all perinatal deaths were due to antepartum fetal deaths, that is, macerated stillbirths occurring before the onset of labour. Forty-four per cent of the perinatal mortality was attributed to intrapartum asphyxia and included fresh stillbirths, macerated stillbirths, with evidence of death occurring during labour, and live-born babies that died after the first day and had clinical evidence of asphyxia. The stillbirth rate was registered as 5.9 per 1000 births in 1984 in Jamaica. However, due to significant under-registration of both infant births and deaths, the publication of stillbirth statistics by the Registrar General’s Department was discontinued in 1984 (Ashley et al., 1994c).

In Jamaica, the conditions that predispose women to experience perinatal mortality are anaemia, high blood pressure and infectious diseases, including STDs (Ashley et al., 1994b). Fifty-one per cent of mothers with perinatal deaths had a decreased haemoglobin level (under 11 g/dl) (Ashley et al., 1994b). This relationship between decreased haemoglobin levels and perinatal deaths is a reflection of prenatal care in Jamaica, because women who receive prenatal care and who have low haemoglobin levels are given iron supplements. Haemoglobin testing is conducted at each clinic visit. Therefore, women who had no prenatal care were less likely to have taken iron supplements (Ashley et al., 1994a). Women in Jamaica who did not take iron supplements experienced 78% more stillbirths than women who took iron supplement (Ashley et al., 1994a). High blood pressure was also found to be strongly associated with perinatal deaths, and 11% of the women who had stillbirths in Jamaica had elevated diastolic blood pressure (⩾ 100 mmHg) compared to only 3% of those with live births (Ashley et al., 1994b).

Women who had a history of syphilis were found to be twice as likely to have had stillbirths compared to those who tested negative (Ashley et al., 1994b). A study conducted shortly after HIV-1 was observed in the Caribbean reported no additional threat to the fetus as a result of infection with this virus, or with HTLV-1 which is endemic in Jamaica (Johnstone et al., 1988). However, Taha et al. (1995) reported that the mortality rate of children born to HIV seropositive mothers was substantially higher than for children born to seronegative mothers. Also, the study showed that the incidence of prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) was higher among infants of HIV seropositive mothers compared to infants of seronegative mothers (Taha et al., 1995).

Several other sociodemographic variables such as age, marital status and rural vs. urban residence have been identified as factors that predispose women to experience perinatal deaths in Jamaica (Mostafa et al., 1991; Golding et al., 1994). Women with the highest risk of having perinatal deaths tended to be young, unmarried and to reside in rural areas (Mostafa et al., 1991; Golding et al., 1994). In addition, women with no existing children were also found to have the highest incidence of stillbirth and the incidence seemed to decrease with an increase in the number of children in the household (Mostafa et al., 1991; Golding et al., 1994). The 1986 Perinatal Mortality survey also found that women who were not living with a steady partner were at greater risk of having perinatal death, particularly antepartum fetal deaths (Ashley et al., 1994c). An independent association was detected between maternal education and antepartum fetal death. Moreover, if the major wage earner of the household had a managerial or professional job, a significant reduced risk for perinatal deaths was observed (Golding et al., 1994).

Studies of perinatal mortality in most developed countries have shown a strong association between perinatal deaths and obstetric histories of the mothers (Greenwood et al., 1994b). A study conducted in Ireland found that mothers who had previous miscarriages had twice the risk of perinatal mortality compared to mothers who had not (Cahalane et al., 1965). An increase in the trend in perinatal deaths among women who had prior miscarriage was also observed in the United States (Niswander and Gordon, 1994).

Although several factors have been found to be associated with perinatal deaths in Jamaica, no study had been conducted to assess comprehensively the risk factors for stillbirth among pregnant women. Over the 10-year period, 1985 – 1995, the total number of cases of stillbirths based on hospital records remained high, fluctuating from 800 to 1100 per year, and the cause of stillbirths was reported mainly as unknown. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify maternal, social and demographic factors related to stillbirth among pregnant women in Jamaica.

Methods

Study design and study population

This was a case – control study in which women who experienced stillbirths (cases) were matched with other women in the same hospital who delivered live babies (controls). In Jamaica, stillbirth is defined as a fetus ⩾ 24 weeks that upon expulsion shows no sign of life; that is, no heartbeat or no breathing. The women were recruited at four major urban hospitals, two in the Southeastern and two in the Northwestern regions of Jamaica, from January 1996 to April 1997.

These hospitals are well equipped and serve over 50% of the prenatal population on the island. One of the hospitals, Victoria Jubilee in Kingston, is a specialty hospital for maternal deliveries and handles 13 000 deliveries per year. The other, Cornwall Regional Hospital in Montego Bay, serves a population of 200 000 or more. The maternity section of this hospital handles approximately 5000 deliveries per year. The other two hospitals are polyclinic centres that specialise in obstetric, surgical and paediatric care and internal medicine. They are located in the parishes of Westmoreland (the Savanna-la-mar Hospital) and St Catherine (the Spanish Town Hospital). The Savanna-la-mar Hospital attends to approximately 3000 deliveries per year and the Spanish Town hospital attends to 7000 – 8000 deliveries per year.

Written consent was obtained from each case and matched control prior to their participation in the study. The women were matched for age (± 10 years in age difference) and date of delivery (within 24 hours). Three hundred and thirty-two women (167 mothers of stillborn infants and 165 mothers of live-born infants) were recruited. Of these, 160 case and 154 control mothers completed the study. Seven cases and 11 women in the control group were dropped from the analysis due to refusal to complete the questionnaire or give a blood sample for the purpose of the study.

Data collection

A questionnaire designed to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, antenatal care, method of delivery, history of STDs including HIV/AIDS, mother’s medical history and infant birth and health information was administered to each mother by a research coordinator. The presence of high blood pressure, which is a component of the mother’s medical history, was verified through medical records and physician’s reports. In this study we used results from blood tests (haemoglobin and blood chemistry) conducted during pregnancy to assess antenatal care received by the women, as blood tests are part of antenatal care in Jamaica.

Statistical analysis

χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests were used to evaluate the univariate association of demographic, maternal and prenatal variables with stillbirth. The Mantel – Haenszel χ2 statistic was used to determine if a trend was present in the proportion of stillbirths over ordered levels of different variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the simultaneous effect of different independent variables on stillbirth. The variables initially included in the model were birth weights of infants, high blood pressure (HBP) during present pregnancy, blood test performed during present pregnancy, distance of residence from the hospitals, hospitalisation for pregnancy-related reasons, gestational age, medical problems and number of months pregnant. Additional variables included in the model were number of people sleeping in the same bed, previous testing for STD, receipt of information on STDs and its prevention, method of delivery, number of children alive, delivery complications, infant abnormalities, number of antenatal care visits, type of birth and presence or absence of any gross abnormalities. A backward selection procedure was performed to determine the significant predictors of stillbirth. Odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the significant prognostic variables in the final model.

Results

Demographic characteristics of cases and controls

Almost half the mothers in both groups were less than 25 years of age (47% in cases, 48% in controls; Table I). Most of the women had some secondary education (74% of cases, 80% of controls) and were involved in a stable relationship, that is, married or common law relationship (55% of cases, 53% of controls) with the father of their child. The majority of women who had stillborn babies (90%) or live births (95%) lived within 5 miles of the hospital/clinic and reported that they had visited an antenatal care clinic during their pregnancy (96% for cases, 97% for controls). There was no significant difference between the sexes of the infants born alive and those stillborn. Case and control mothers gave birth to similar proportions of male and female babies. There were six sets of twins and one set of triplets in the stillbirth group, and two sets of twins and no triplets in the live-born group. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in the distribution of the variables reported in Table I was observed between cases and controls.

Table I.

Demographic characteristics of cases and controls

Variables Controls N (%) Cases N (%) P value
Age of mothers (in years)
 ⩽ 25 80 (48) 75 (47) 0.07
 > 25– <35 74 (45) 63 (39)
 ⩾ 35 11 (7) 23 (14)
Educational level
 No formal/primary 23 (14) 36 (22) 0.11
 Secondary/technical 129 (80) 119 (74)
 Tertiary/university 9 (6) 5 (3)
Marital Status
 Married 16 (10) 20 (12) 0.89
 Common law 70 (43) 69 (43)
 Visiting relationship 68 (42) 65 (41)
 Other 7 (4) 6 (4)
Distance from hospital/clinic (miles)
 0 – 5 148 (95) 138 (90) 0.08
 > 5 8 (5) 16 (10)
Received antenatal care
 Yes 159 (97) 155 (96) 0.57
 No 5 (3) 7 (4)
Sex of infant
 Male 99 (60) 83 (55) 0.30
 Female 65 (40) 69 (45)

Univariate analysis of risk factors for stillbirth

Based on univariate analysis, there was a significant association between the distance that the women lived away from the hospital and having stillborn babies (P = < 0.0001, Table II). Thirty-two per cent of the mothers with stillborn babies lived more than 10 miles from the hospital, compared to 14% of the mothers who had live-born babies. Table II also shows that among the cases, 28% reported having no living children, whereas only 9% of the controls reported no living children (P = 0.0001). Among women with stillborn babies, 30% had high blood pressure (HBP) during their most recent pregnancy compared with 17% of mothers with live-born babies (P = 0.004).

Table II.

Univariate analysis of demographic and health history factors related to stillbirth

Variables Controls N (%) Cases N (%) P value
Distance from hospital (miles)
 0 – 10 141 (86) 107 (68) < 0.0001
 > 10 23 (14) 51 (32)
Number of living children
 None 14 (9) 45 (28) < 0.0001
 1 40 (25) 52 (32)
 2 41 (26) 37 (23)
 3 33 (21) 16 (10)
 4 20 (13) 5 (3)
 5 8 (5) 3 (2)
 6 3 (2) 2 (1)
HBP during pregnancy
 Yes 27 (17) 48 (30) 0.004
 No 135 (83) 110 (70)
Hospitalisation during pregnancy
 Yes 19 (12) 36 (22) 0.009
 No 144 (88) 124 (78)
Blood tests performed during pregnancy
 Yes 150 (93) 126 (79) 0.0004
 No 12 (7) 34 (21)
Number of antenatal visits
 0 – 3 31 (19) 66 (43) < 0.0001
 4 – 6 71 (44) 53 (35)
 7 – 9 36 (22) 29 (19)
 ⩾ 10 22 (14) 5 (3)
Received information on STDs and prevention
 Yes 136 (86) 107 (69) 0.0007
 No 23 (14) 47 (30)
Duration of time since STD information was received
 6 months 40 (25) 21 (14) 0.01
 7 months – 1 year 33 (20) 26 (17)
 > 1 year 66 (41) 69 (45)

HBP = high blood pressure; STD = sexually transmitted diseases.

Table II shows that 22% of the cases and 12% of controls were hospitalised during the current pregnancy before delivery for pregnancy related reasons (P = 0.009). The most frequently reported reasons for hospitalisation were bleeding, high blood pressure and infections. In addition, 93% of controls remembered having blood tests, such as tests for iron, haemoglobin and other routine tests (other than STDs) performed during their current pregnancy compared to 79% of cases (Table II). A significant relationship was observed between stillbirth and blood tests performed during the present pregnancy (P = 0.0004). A blood test performed during pregnancy was used as a proxy to assess antenatal care received by the women, because blood tests are performed routinely as a part of antenatal care in Jamaica. Although most of the women had visited the clinic or hospital while they were pregnant, mothers with stillbirths were found to attend less frequently than mothers who had live-born babies (Table II). Forty-three per cent of cases reported that they had visited an antenatal clinic (ANC) only 0 – 3 times compared to 19% of controls. The frequency of visits in the ANC was significantly related to stillbirth in this study (P < 0.001).

Only 69% of the mothers with stillborn babies reported having received information on STDs and their prevention compared to 86% of the control mothers (P = 0.001). With regard to the duration of time since the mothers had received information on STDs, 45% of mothers of live-born babies reported that they had received information on STD in less than 1 year, compared to 31% of mothers with stillborn babies (P = 0.01).

Table III shows that 96% of controls had normal vaginal delivery compared with 84% of cases (P = 0.0005). Fifty-two per cent of mothers with stillborn babies had complications during their delivery in contrast to 13% of mothers with live babies (P < 0.001). The most commonly reported complications during delivery were breech, abruption of the placenta, pre-eclampsia, ruptured membranes and bleeding. Some of these complications are indications for a caesarean section. Among mothers with live-born babies, 86% delivered at 9 months of pregnancy compared to only 38% of mothers with stillborn babies (P < 0.0001).

Table III.

Univariate analysis of delivery and infant factors related to stillbirth

Variables Controls N (%) Cases N (%) P value
Method of delivery
 Normal spontaneous vaginal delivery 157 (96) 133 (84) 0.0005
 Caesarean section 7 (4) 25 (16)
Complications during delivery
 Yes 22 (13) 78 (52) < 0.0001
 No 141 (87) 72 (48)
Gestational age at birth (weeks)
 ⩽ 28 7 (4) 43 (28) < 0.0001
 29 – 36 79 (49) 77 (50)
 ⩾ 37 74 (46) 34 (22)
Unfavourable/adverse fetal outcomes
 Yes 19 (12) 71 (47) < 0.0001
 No 141 (88) 81 (53)
Birth weight of infant (g)
 < 1499 4 (4) 22 (19) < 0.0001
 ⩾ 1500 – 1999 2 (1) 21 (18)
 ⩾ 2000 – 2500 12 (8) 20 (17)
 ⩾ 2501 – 3499 94 (59) 35 (30)
 ⩾ 3500 45 (28) 19 (16)

Gestational age of infants at the time of delivery, birth weight and observed abnormalities were also compared for the two groups. Table III shows that 78% of stillbirths were delivered at less than 37 weeks’ gestation compared to 53% of live-born infants (P < 0.0001). Forty-seven per cent of the stillborn babies had unfavourable and/or adverse fetal outcomes identified compared to 12% of the live-born babies (P < 0.0001). The most common unfavourable and/or adverse fetal outcomes reported by physicians were the umbilical cord wrapped around the neck, severe fetal distress in labour and skin peeling (maceration), and collapsed bone. Fifty-four per cent of stillborn babies had low birth weight (⩽ 2500 g), and 19% had very low birth weight (< 1499 g). Conversely, 13% of live-born babies had low birth weight and only 4% had very low birth weight.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis

Six variables were found to be significant predictors of stillbirth using multivariate logistic regression. Stillborn infants were 4.3 times more likely to have lower birth weights compared to live-born infants (OR = 4.3, CI = 2.4 – 7.7; Table IV). Complication during pregnancy or delivery was also found to be a significant predictor for stillbirth. The risk for stillbirth decreased by 81% among women with no complications at the time of delivery (OR = 0.19, CI = 0.09 – 041). Another factor found to be a predictor of stillbirth was the method of delivery. Women who delivered their babies by caesarean section were 7.2 times more likely to have stillborn babies compared to women who gave birth naturally (CI = 1.6 – 33.2). Further, the results show that a woman’s risk for stillbirth decreased by 46% as the number of living children before the current pregnancy increased (OR = 0.54 CI = 0.40 – 0.73). Women who visited the ANC less than three times during their pregnancy were twice as likely to have stillborn babies compared to women who visited the ANC more than three times (OR = 2.0, CI = 1.3 – 3.1). Unfavourable and/or adverse infant outcomes were four times more likely to be observed among stillborn babies compared to live-born babies (OR = 4.0, CI = 1.8 – 9.2).

Table IV.

Predictors of stillbirths among pregnant women in Jamaica

Variable Risk indicator OR 95% CI P value
Birth weight (g) < 2501 4.3 2.4 – 7.7 < 0.0001
Complications during pregnancy or delivery Yes 0.19 0.09 – 0.41 < 0.001
Method of delivery Caesarean section 7.2 1.6 – 33.2 0.01
Number of living children None 0.54 0.40 – 0.73 < 0.0001
Number of antenatal visits Less than 3 2.0 1.3 – 3.1 0.0008
Unfavourable/adverse fetal outcomes Yes 4.0 1.8 – 9.2 0.0008

Discussion

The results of this study provide information on significant predictors of stillbirth in Jamaica. Low birth weight (LBW) was an independent risk factor for stillbirth. Babies born with LBW were more likely to be stillborn, and a greater proportion of very LBW babies were stillborn. The strong association found between stillbirth and LBW is consistent with the studies conducted in Kenya and Latin America (Morrison and Olsen, 1985; Were 1994). In this study, we are uncertain of whether stillbirth was a consequence of LBW, therefore further studies on the effect of birth weight on stillbirth is needed. However, these results highlight the significance of diagnosing intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and the possibility of lowering the rate of stillbirth as a number of epidemiological studies have shown that LBW contributes to perinatal mortality (Gadow et al., 1991).

Similar to this study, complications or illness during pregnancy were also found to be associated with high risk for stillbirth in Brazil (Ferraz and Gray, 1990). A much larger percentage of women with stillbirths in this study had been admitted to a hospital for pregnancy-related reasons before delivery in comparison to mothers with live-born babies. Around 20% of fetal deaths were attributable to complications such as abruption of the placenta, pre-eclampsia, prelabour ruptured membranes and bleeding. Studies conducted in Finland and Zambia (Watts and Harris, 1982; Hovatta et al. 1983) have also shown that greater than 50% of women with stillborn babies had medical complications during pregnancy. It appears that complication during pregnancy is a significant predictor of stillbirth in different countries. Therefore, timely and adequate antenatal care can ameliorate potential risks for stillbirth (Ferraz and Gray, 1990).

Almost all deliveries in this study were normal spontaneous vaginal deliveries. None the less, emergency caesarean sections were performed on mothers with pregnancy-related complications and most caesarean sections were performed on mothers who had stillbirths compared to mothers of live-born infants. However, the use of caesarean section was likely to be the consequence of complications leading to stillbirth rather than caesarean section being a risk factor for stillbirth.

With regard to the association between the number of living children delivered by a woman and risk for stillbirth, an increased risk for stillbirth was detected for women with no living children, and an increase in the number of living children lowered this risk. Golding et al. (1994) reported a similar observation between the risk for perinatal death and the number of children in the household. The indication of lower risk for women with greater number of children is interesting. We believe that having more children provides women with more experience in dealing with pregnancies.

The number of stillbirths was higher among women who visited the antenatal clinic less frequently. Lack of antenatal care during pregnancy may prevent early detection of problems leading to stillbirth. The multivariate analysis also showed an association between stillbirth and unfavourable and/or adverse fetal outcomes. Stillborn babies had more documented unfavourable fetal features compared to live-born babies. However, the possibility of bias cannot be ruled out because midwives, physicians and other healthcare professionals are more likely to report unfavourable fetal complications when the outcome of pregnancy is stillbirth (Kumar and Singhi, 1992). It is very difficult to identify a specific condition such as umbilical cord prolapse, cord around neck and premature separation of placenta, that directly caused the death of a fetus in areas of the world where advanced technology is scarce. Women may find it difficult to perceive fetal movements coupled with imprecision in the physician’s inability to hear the fetal heart beat (Yeong et al., 1997). However, there is always scope for decreasing the rate of stillbirth if the available techniques in prenatal diagnosis, patient education and antenatal surveillance are optimised. Although numerous studies have shown a strong relationship between anaemia and stillbirth, our study failed to establish such a relationship. This may be attributed partly to the small sample size of this study, and failure to obtain haemoglobin data for all of the women.

In conclusion, this study identified several factors predictive of stillbirths. However, identification of women at high risk for stillbirth cannot be viewed as beneficial if this is not coupled with recommendations and institution of policies and procedures that address the risks identified. In Jamaica, Types I and II health centres that serve smaller populations are located in rural communities. Encouraging women to make use of these centres to seek antenatal care will help in the early detection of conditions that may lead to pregnancy complications and so decrease stillbirths. Health officials should also examine the utility of these centres and determine their contribution to antenatal services. In addition, women with no living children should be considered as a high-risk group for adverse pregnancy outcomes and should be given proper education on pregnancy. Antenatal surveillance should be implemented, especially among women with a previous record of stillbirth and miscarriage. Proper monitoring of the next pregnancy of these women should be a part of the antenatal care programme. Simple measurement of the fundal height of the uterus by means of a simple malleable ruler may help to detect IUGR (Belizan et al., 1978) and proper action can be taken to decrease LBW. More emphasis should be placed not only on early detection of problems but also on quality of care and adequate management of complications and should result in a decrease in the incidence of stillbirths in Jamaica.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Jamaican mothers who willingly participated and the staff and directors of the hospitals whose cooperation made this study possible. We would also like to thank Dr Curtis Jolly for reviewing the manuscript, Ms Delivette Castor and Mr Paul Kamara for technical assistance and Ms Sonja Bragg for help in data collection. This study was supported by the Minority International Research Training (MIRT) grant no. T37-TW00077 from the Fogarty International Center, NIH and the Ministry of Health, Jamaica.

References

  1. Ashley D, Golding J, Greenwood R and McCaw A (1994a) Antenatal and perinatal care in Jamaica: do they reduce perinatal death rate? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 8, 166–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashley D, Greenwood R, McCaw-Binns A, Thomas P and Golding J (1994b) Medical conditions present during pregnancy and risk of perinatal death in Jamaica. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 8 (Supplement 1), 66–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashley D, McCaw-Binns A, Golding J, Keeling J, Escoffery C, Coard K and Foster-Williams K (1994c) Perinatal mortality survey in Jamaica: aims and methodology. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 8 (Supplement 1), 6–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Belizan J, Villar J, Nardin J, Malamud J and de Vicurna LS (1978) Diagnosis of IUGR by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 131, 643–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cahalane SF, Kennedy JD, McNicoll B and O’Dwyer E (1965) Perinatal mortality survey for County Galway, 18 months, October 1958 through March 1960. Journal of the Irish Medical Association, 57, 135–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferraz EM and Gray RH (1990) A case – control study of stillbirths in NE Brazil. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 34, 13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gadow EC, Castilla EE, Lopez Camelo J and Queenan JT (1991) Stillbirth rate and associated risk factors among 869,750 Latin American hospitals births 1982 – 1986. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 35, 209–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Golding J, Greenwood R, McCaw-Binns A and Thomas P (1994) Associations between social and environmental factors and perinatal mortality in Jamaica. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 8, 17–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenwood R, Golding J, McCaw-Binns A, Keeling J and Ashley D (1994a) The epidemiology of perinatal death in Jamaica. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 8, 143–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenwood R, Samms-Vaughan M, Golding J and Ashley D (1994b) Past obstetric history and risk of perinatal death in Jamaica. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 8 (Supplement 1), 40–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hovatta O, Lipasti A, Rapolo J and Karjalainen O (1983) Causes of stillbirths: a clinical pathological study of 243 patients. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 90, 691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnstone F, Maccalum L, Brettle R, Inglis JM and Peutheter J (1988) Does infection with HIV affect the outcome of pregnancy? British Medical Journal, 296, 467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar R and Singhi S (1992) Risk factors for stillbirth in a rural community. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 59, 455–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morrison MB and Olsen J (1985) Weight-specific stillbirths and associated causes of death: an analysis of 765 stillbirths. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 152, 975–980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mostafa G, Wojtyniak B, Fauveau V and Bhuiyan A (1991) The relationship between socio-demographic variables and pregnancy loss in rural area of Bangladesh. Journal of Biosocial Science, 23, 55–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Niswander KR and Gordon M (1972) The Women and Their Pregnancies. Philadelphia, Saunders. [Google Scholar]
  17. Taha TE, Dallabetta GA, Canner JK, Chiphangwi JD, Liomba G, Hoover DR and Miotti PG (1995) The effect of human immunideficiency virus infection on birthweight, and infant and child mortality in urban Malawi. International Journal of Epidemiology, 24, 1022–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Watts T and Harris RR (1982) A case-control study of stillbirths at a teaching hospital in Zambia, 1979 – 80, antenatal factors. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 60, 971–976. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Were EO (1994) Stillbirths at Eldoret District Hospital: a retrospective study. East African Medical Journal, 71, 607–610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yeong CT, Tan KH, Tee CS and Yeo GSH (1997) Optimising management of stillbirths in modern Singapore. Singapore Medical Journal, 38, 317–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES