Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: Cytometry A. 2018 Jan 22;93(4):402–405. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23331

OMIP-044: 28-color immunophenotyping of the human dendritic cell compartment

Florian Mair 1, Martin Prlic 1
PMCID: PMC6785241  NIHMSID: NIHMS1013454  PMID: 29356334

PURPOSE AND APPROPRIATE SAMPLE TYPES

This 28-color panel has been developed for an extensive phenotyping of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in human blood and tissue samples. 15 markers associated with changes in dendritic cell (DC) function were selected based on the current literature. Five additional markers were used to pre-gate on canonical DC subpopulations, namely CD141+ cross-presenting conventional DC1 (cDC1), CD1c+ conventional DC2 (cDC2), CD141- CD1c- cDCs as well as CD123+ plasmacytoid DCs (pDC). Furthermore, seven lineage markers were included for parallel enumeration of CD14+ monocytes, B cells, NK cells as well as CD4+ and CD8+ αβ T cells with basic phenotyping of their differentiation status. The panel has been tested on cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and allows further inclusion of DC antigens at the cost of pan-phenotyping markers.

Background

While adaptive immune cells such as T and B lymphocytes are widely studied as the essential effector cells of the immune system, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are the upstream gatekeepers initiating and shaping virtually any adaptive immune response (1,2). The past decade has revealed considerable functional specialization within the murine and human dendritic cell (DC) compartment (35). However, only recently studies have focused on the myeloid populations present in human non-lymphoid tissues, showing similarities as well as functional differences to the murine system (6). These advancements have largely been fueled by technical developments in the field of flow cytometry (7) and single-cell RNA-sequencing (sc-RNAseq) (8). Importantly, increasing evidence suggests that studying DC biology in the context of autoimmune diseases (9) as well as cancer progression might reveal novel approaches for therapeutic interventions (10,11). In particular, via their presence in non-lymphoid tissues and their expression of co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory receptors, DCs are considered critical for shaping either a tolerogenic or pro-inflammatory local immune milieu (2,12).

We took advantage of the availability of 30-parameter fluorescent flow cytometry instrumentation to develop an in-depth phenotyping panel of the human DC compartment based on the most recent sc-RNAseq based classifications (8,13). Thus, we designed the panel to provide a flow cytometry-based approach to examine the DC subsets reported in these sc-RNAseq-based studies. CD45 was included to allow clear separation of hematopoietic cells from contaminating stroma in non-lymphoid tissue samples. For gating on established DC subsets the markers CD11c, HLA-DR, CD141 (also known as BDCA-3, marks cDC1), CD1c (BDCA-1, marks cDC2) and CD123 (pDC) were used (14,15). A set of 15 surface molecules was compiled, each of which has previously been reported to be a relevant readout for DC function either in inflammatory disorders or in the context of anti-tumor immunity: the costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80 and CD86, the low-affinity Fc-receptors CD16 (Fcγr3a) and CD32 (Fcγr2a/b), the chemokine receptors CCR7 and CX3CR1, the scavenger receptor CD163, the complement receptor CD11b, as well as CD85k (also known as ILT-3), BTLA (CD272, also known as B and T lymphocyte attenuator), CD26, CD38 and CD172 (also known as Sirpα) (1620). In order to obtain a more complete assessment of the immune compartment in rare and valuable human tissue samples, the lineage markers CD3 (pan T cells), CD14 (classical monocytes), CD19 (B cells), CD56 (NK cells) as well as CD4 and CD8 were included. Thus, in conjunction with CCR7 and CD45RA, this panel allows the parallel assessment of the T cell compartment for differentiation status (21). Of note, CCR7 has also been shown to be essential for DC migration to draining lymph nodes (22).

The detailed steps of panel development as well as different tested reagent combinations are described in the supplementary online material. Briefly, the initial in silico planning of marker assignment was based on a spillover spreading matrix (SSM) calculated for the instrument used (23), followed by iterative refinement to minimize the loss of resolution in detectors with low-expression antigens. All reagents used were titrated either to saturation or towards a selected optimal concentration. Of note, the panel was designed to allow the inclusion of two additional DC markers (namely the co-inhibitory molecules PD-L1 and PD-L2, which are not expressed on blood DCs but only after stimulation or on non-lymphoid tissue DCs) at the cost of the T cell markers CD4 and CD8. Furthermore, the two markers assigned to the V-450 and B-515 detectors (CX3CR1, and CD26, respectively) can be swapped to almost any other target antigen of interest without the need for additional modifications to the panel, since these two detectors neither collect nor contribute any spillover (Online Figure 2). An example gating tree of the full 28-color staining on a typical PBMC sample is shown in Figure 1, together with selected fluorescent-minus-one (FMO) controls. Additional staining and gating controls are shown in Online Figure 3 and 4. The panel performed robustly on different PBMC samples (Online Figure 5), and has also successfully been tested on human tissue samples and fresh human blood (data not shown). After pregating on CD45+ live singlets (Figure 1A), lineage positive cells (CD14, CD3, CD19, CD56) were gated as separate populations and excluded for downstream APC analysis (Figure 1C), pDCs were identified as HLA-DR+ CD123+ cells, and conventional DCs as HLA-DR+ CD123- CD11c+ cells (Figure 1E). Within this gate, cDC1 are CD141+, cDC2 are CD1c+, and the remaining population constitutes double negative DCs (DN-DCs). The differential expression pattern of the phenotypic markers on cDC1, cDC2, DN-DCs and pDCs is summarized in Figure 1G, and selected FMOs are shown in Figure 1H. Furthermore, this 30-parameter dataset allows parallel phenotyping of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (e.g. using CD45RA, CCR7 and CX3CR1) (Figure 1D) as well as B cells (e.g. using CD80, CD32, CCR7), and NK cells (e.g. using CD16). Given that exhaustive analysis using manual two-dimensional gating is not feasible (24,25), several novel approaches for exploratory analysis of high-dimensional single-cell datasets have been reported in the past years, among them t-stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) (26,27), which can be used in conjunction with the clustering algorithms Phenograph (28) or FlowSOM (29). Though these tools have been developed primarily for an intuitive graphical representation of complex mass cytometry datasets, they can be used for fluorescent flow cytometry data as well, if appropriate quality control is performed (30). An example t-SNE analysis of the CD45+ live events is shown in Online Figure 6.

Figure 1: Overview gating of an example 30-parameter dataset on cryopreserved PBMCs.

Figure 1:

Cryopreserved PBMCs were obtained from AllCells, stained and subsequently aquired on a BD FACSymphony. Optimal PMT voltages were determined by voltage titration experiments and iterative refinement. All reagents were titrated prior to use. For Figures (C) till (G), files were concatenated from two separate aquisitions. Additional gating and staining controls are shown in Online Figure 35. (A) Gating strategy for live CD45+ singlets, after exclusion of debris and doublets. (B) Overview of the 28 markers analyzed within this experiment. (C) Gating strategy for major immune cell lineages (CD14+ classical monocytes, CD19+ B cells and CD3+ T cells). (D) CCR7 and CD45RA expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (E) After exclusion of CD14+ CD19+ CD3+ events, gating strategy for CD56+ NK cells and lineage-negative HLA-DR+ cells, followed by identification of CD123+ plasmacytoid DCs and canonical subsets within conventional CD11c+ HLA-DR+ DCs. Color shading indicates the populations used for histogram overlays. (F) FMO control for CD80 expression on CD19+ B cells. (G) Differential expression of selected markers on the indicated DC subsets: CD123+ pDCs (green), double negative DCs (orange), CD141+ cDC1 (blue) and CD1c+ cDC2 (red) as gated in (E). (H) Overview of selected markers on CD11c+ HLA-DR+ DCs including the corresponding fluorescent-minus-one (FMO) controls (lower panel). BUV: Brilliant Ultraviolet, BV: Brilliant Violet, BB: Brilliant Blue, AF: AlexaFluor, PE: Phycoerythrin, APC: Allophycocyanin.

In summary, we report here the first 28-color immunophenotyping focused on the human APC compartment, in parallel yielding additional information about all major immune lineages. We believe that this panel not only provides a valuable resource for future studies of myeloid cell phenotypes, but also allows for flexible exchange of up to four markers, and can be used for a variety of human blood and tissue samples in different disease states.

Similarity to other published OMIPs

While there are other OMIPs that allow for a broad immunophenotyping of human PBMCs including simple enumeration of DCs (OMIP-023 and OMIP-024) or DC subsets (31), up to date there is no OMIP focusing specifically on the human myeloid compartment, and none that allows for an extensive phenotyping of human DCs as described here.

Supplementary Material

Suppl

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Flow Cytometry Shared Resource of the FHCRC (Andrew Berger) and the HIV Vaccine Trial Network (in particular Dr. Stephen de Rosa and Karen McLellan) for access to their instruments. We thank Sabine Spath for critical reading of the manuscript.

Grant sponsor: NIH 1DP2DE023321

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mellman I, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells: specialized and regulated antigen processing machines. Cell 2001;106:255–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Merad M, Sathe P, Helft J, Miller J, Mortha A. The dendritic cell lineage: ontogeny and function of dendritic cells and their subsets in the steady state and the inflamed setting. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2013;31:563–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schlitzer A, McGovern N, Teo P, Zelante T, Atarashi K, Low D, Ho AWS, See P, Shin A, Wasan PS, Hoeffel G, Malleret B, Heiseke A, Chew S, Jardine L, Purvis HA, Hilkens CMU, Tam J, Poidinger M, Stanley ER, Krug AB, Renia L, Sivasankar B, Ng LG, Collin M, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Honda K, Haniffa M, Ginhoux F. IRF4 transcription factor-dependent CD11b+ dendritic cells in human and mouse control mucosal IL-17 cytokine responses. Immunity 2013;38:970–983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guilliams M, Ginhoux F, Jakubzick C, Naik SH, Onai N, Schraml BU, Segura E, Tussiwand R, Yona S. Dendritic cells, monocytes and macrophages: a unified nomenclature based on ontogeny. Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14:571–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gerner MY, Torabi-Parizi P, Germain RN. Strategically localized dendritic cells promote rapid T cell responses to lymph-borne particulate antigens. Immunity 2015;42:172–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guilliams M, Dutertre C-A, Scott CL, McGovern N, Sichien D, Chakarov S, Van Gassen S, Chen J, Poidinger M, De Prijck S, Tavernier SJ, Low I, Irac SE, Mattar CN, Sumatoh HR, Low GHL, Chung TJK, Chan DKH, Tan KK, Hon TLK, Fossum E, Bogen B, Choolani M, Chan JKY, Larbi A, Luche H, Henri S, Saeys Y, Newell EW, Lambrecht BN, Malissen B, Ginhoux F. Unsupervised High-Dimensional Analysis Aligns Dendritic Cells across Tissues and Species. Immunity 2016;45:669–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bendall SC, Nolan GP, Roederer M, Chattopadhyay PK. A deep profiler’s guide to cytometry. Trends in Immunology 2012;33:323–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Villani A-C, Satija R, Reynolds G, Sarkizova S, Shekhar K, Fletcher J, Griesbeck M, Butler A, Zheng S, Lazo S, Jardine L, Dixon D, Stephenson E, Nilsson E, Grundberg I, McDonald D, Filby A, Li W, De Jager PL, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Lane AA, Haniffa M, Regev A, Hacohen N. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors. Science 2017;356:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ganguly D, Haak S, Sisirak V, Reizis B. The role of dendritic cells in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:566–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chevrier S, Levine JH, Zanotelli VRT, Silina K, Schulz D, Bacac M, Ries CH, Ailles L, Jewett MAS, Moch H, van den Broek M, Beisel C, Stadler MB, Gedye C, Reis B, Pe’er D, Bodenmiller B. An Immune Atlas of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cell 2017;169:736–749.e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen DS, Mellman I. Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity 2013;39:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jang J-E, Hajdu CH, Liot C, Miller G, Dustin ML, Bar-Sagi D. Crosstalk between Regulatory T Cells and Tumor-Associated Dendritic Cells Negates Anti-tumor Immunity in Pancreatic Cancer. Cell Rep 2017;20:558–571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.See P, Dutertre C-A, Chen J, Günther P, McGovern N, Irac SE, Gunawan M, Beyer M, Händler K, Duan K, Sumatoh HRB, Ruffin N, Jouve M, Gea-Mallorquí E, Hennekam RCM, Lim T, Yip CC, Wen M, Malleret B, Low I, Shadan NB, Fen CFS, Tay A, Lum J, Zolezzi F, Larbi A, Poidinger M, Chan JKY, Chen Q, Renia L, Haniffa M, Benaroch P, Schlitzer A, Schultze JL, Newell EW, Ginhoux F. Mapping the human DC lineage through the integration of high-dimensional techniques. Science 2017;66:eaag3009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dzionek A, Fuchs A, Schmidt P, Cremer S, Zysk M, Miltenyi S, Buck DW, Schmitz J. BDCA-2, BDCA-3, and BDCA-4: three markers for distinct subsets of dendritic cells in human peripheral blood. J. Immunol. 2000;165:6037–6046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schlitzer A, Ginhoux F. Organization of the mouse and human DC network. Current Opinion in Immunology 2014;26:90–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roberts EW, Broz ML, Binnewies M, Headley MB, Nelson AE, Wolf DM, Kaisho T, Bogunovic D, Bhardwaj N, Krummel MF. Critical Role for CD103(+)/CD141(+) Dendritic Cells Bearing CCR7 for Tumor Antigen Trafficking and Priming of T Cell Immunity in Melanoma. Cancer Cell 2016;30:324–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mazzini E, Massimiliano L, Penna G, Rescigno M. Oral tolerance can be established via gap junction transfer of fed antigens from CX3CR1+ macrophages to CD103+ dendritic cells. Immunity 2014;40:248–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Komohara Y, Niino D, Saito Y, Ohnishi K, Horlad H, Ohshima K, Takeya M. Clinical significance of CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages in patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:945–951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Goeje PL, Bezemer K, Heuvers ME, Dingemans A-MC, Groen HJ, Smit EF, Hoogsteden HC, Hendriks RW, Aerts JG, Hegmans JP. Immunoglobulin-like transcript 3 is expressed by myeloid-derived suppressor cells and correlates with survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncoimmunology 2015;4:1014242–1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jones A, Bourque J, Kuehm L, Opejin A, Teague RM, Gross C, Hawiger D. Immunomodulatory Functions of BTLA and HVEM Govern Induction of Extrathymic Regulatory T Cells and Tolerance by Dendritic Cells. Immunity 2016;45:1066–1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sallusto F, Lenig D, Förster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 1999;401:708–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ohl L, Mohaupt M, Czeloth N, Hintzen G, Kiafard Z, Zwirner J, Blankenstein T, Henning G, Förster R. CCR7 governs skin dendritic cell migration under inflammatory and steady-state conditions. Immunity 2004;21:279–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nguyen R, Perfetto S, Mahnke YD, Chattopadhyay P, Roederer M. Quantifying spillover spreading for comparing instrument performance and aiding in multicolor panel design. Cytometry A 2013;83:306–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Newell EW, Cheng Y. Mass cytometry: blessed with the curse of dimensionality. Nat. Imm. 2016;17:890–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saeys Y, Gassen SV, Lambrecht BN. Computational flow cytometry: helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data. Nat Rev Immunol 2016;16:449–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Van der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2008;9:2579–2605. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Amir E-AD, Davis KL, Tadmor MD, Simonds EF, Levine JH, Bendall SC, Shenfeld DK, Krishnaswamy S, Nolan GP, Pe’er D. viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:545–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Levine JH, Simonds EF, Bendall SC, Davis KL, Amir E-AD, Tadmor MD, Litvin O, Fienberg HG, Jager A, Zunder ER, Finck R, Gedman AL, Radtke I, Downing JR, Pe’er D, Nolan GP. Data-Driven Phenotypic Dissection of AML Reveals Progenitor-like Cells that Correlate with Prognosis. Cell 2015;162:184–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Van Gassen S, Callebaut B, Van Helden MJ, Lambrecht BN, Demeester P, Dhaene T, Saeys Y. FlowSOM: Using self-organizing maps for visualization and interpretation of cytometry data. Brinkman RR, Aghaeepour N, Finak G, Gottardo R, Mosmann, Scheuermann RH, editors. Cytometry A 2015;87:636–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mair F, Hartmann FJ, Mrdjen D, Tosevski V, Krieg C, Becher B. The end of gating? An introduction to automated analysis of high dimensional cytometry data. Eur. J. Immunol. 2016;46:34–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Autissier P, Soulas C, Burdo TH, Williams KC. Evaluation of a 12-color flow cytometry panel to study lymphocyte, monocyte, and dendritic cell subsets in humans. Cytometry A 2010;77:410–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl

RESOURCES