Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
letter
. 2019 Oct;67(10):1780. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_764_19

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry

Ertugrul Can 1, Hilal Eser-Ozturk 1,, Mustafa Duran 1, Tugba Cetinkaya 2, Nursen Arıturk 1
PMCID: PMC6786206  PMID: 31546567

Sir,

We appreciate the comments by Mansoori T.[1] on our recently published article in Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.[2]

We would like to clarify the method of ultrasonic pachymetry (UP) measurements. Three consecutive measurements were taken three times (totally 9 measurements) by the same investigator and the mean value of these measurements were analyzed and compared. Because the UP is already considered as the gold standard method for measuring central corneal thickness (CCT), we thought we did not need to further investigate intra-operator and intra-session repeatability of CCT measurements with the UP. Regarding that the most reliable measurements are taken with UP, other three devices were compared with it.

We agree that the references for intra-observer repeatability of CCT measurements with Lenstar LS900, Galilei and Accutome PachPen UP should be stated in the article. Both of non-contact devices and UP showed high intra-observer repeatability for corneal thickness measurements in the literature.[3,4,5]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Mansoori T. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67:1508. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_582_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Can E, Eser-Ozturk H, Duran M, Cetinkaya T, Arıturk N. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67:496–9. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_960_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bjelos Roncevic M, Busic M, Cima I, Kuzmanovic Elabjer B, Bosnar D, Miletic D. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:83–7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1546-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carvino A, Dominguez-Vicent A, Ferrer-Blasco T, Garcia-Lazaro S, Albarran-Diego C. Intrasubject repeatability of corneal power, thickness, and wavefront aberrations with a new version of dual rotating scheimflug-placido system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:186–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peyman M, Tai LY, Khaw KW, Ng CM, Win MM, Subrayan V. Accutome PachPen handheld ultrasonic pachymeter: Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility by personnel of different training devices. Int Ophthalmol. 2015;35:651–5. doi: 10.1007/s10792-014-9989-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES