Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 8;10(5):e01496-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01496-19

TABLE 2.

Testable hypotheses that arise from placing microbiome-dependent ontogenetic timing (MiDOT) in a life history contexta

Microbiome species effect
on host life history
Possible signal
Presence Abundance Functions in specific contexts
Affects only MiDOT Vertical transmission:
no useful information
(always present)
Vertical transmission:
contains information if
population growth is
predictable; could then
trigger or increase
the rate of transition.
Vertical transmission:
contains information if
changes in microbial
function are correlated
with changes in host size;
could then trigger, increase
(or decrease for functions
largest at small sizes) the
rate of transition.
Horizontal transmission:
if no external drivers to
acquisition (Fig. 2A),
then high variance in
timing at low transmission
could potentially be leveraged
for bet-hedging. If acquisition
is context/timing specific
(Fig. 2B and C), acquisition
potentially selected as a
trigger or as an increase
in the rate of a transition.
Horizontal transmission
contains information only
if at high rates (low rates
result in high variance
[Fig. 2A, light green],
where high rates have low
variance, resembling vertical
transmission in pattern over
age/time); then selected to
trigger or increase the rate
of transition.
Horizontal transmission:
contains information if
functional succession is
reliable (trigger or increase
or decrease the rate of
transition as discussed above)
Affects MiDOT and
alters other fitness
components (growth,
survival); is thus guaranteed to
contain a signal, since
presence encodes
information relevant
to the optimal.
Vertical transmission:
no useful information
(always present)
Vertical or horizontal
transmission: modulation
possible (increases or
decreases), see the cell
above; bet-hedging
unlikely; see the cell on the left
Assuming that functional
composition is more important
than taxonomic composition
(i.e., different microbes can
have the same effect on fitness
components like growth and
survival) then selection for
increases or decreases based
around functional composition
expected (as discussed above).
Horizontal transmission:
effect on other fitness
components might
increase correlations
within a cohort of hosts,
thus reducing utility for
bet-hedging.
Increases or decreases
in the rate of a transition
could both occur
(depending on the direction
of the effect on other fitness
components); triggering unlikely.
As above but in an
environment-specific
fashion.
As in the cell above, with
the potential addition of cue
indicative of specific environment.
As in the cell above, with
the potential addition of
cue indicative of specific
environment.
As in the cell above, with
the potential addition of
cue indicative of environment.
Potentially makes the
signal misleading if
microbiome cues do not
contain environmental
information.
If the cue is misleading, the
by-product leads to mismatch
between timing and environment
a

Categorizing MiDOT via its effects across the life history (leftmost column), and the information encoded by presence/abundance/functions and by-products (Possible signal columns), for vertical or horizontal transmission. We focus on the example of a monocarpic species and evaluate potential contributions to optimizing timing (either as a trigger or as increase/decrease in the rate of a transition [Fig. 1]) or bet-hedging (see the text).