Abstract
The current leading Zika vaccine candidates in clinical testing are based on live or killed virus platforms, which have safety issues, especially in pregnant women. Zika subunit vaccines, however, have shown poor performance in preclinical studies, most likely because the antigens tested do not display critical quaternary structure epitopes present on Zika E protein homodimers that cover the surface of the virus. Here, we produce stable recombinant E protein homodimers that are recognized by strongly neutralizing Zika specific monoclonal antibodies. In mice, the dimeric antigen stimulate strongly neutralizing antibodies that target epitopes that are similar to epitopes recognized by human antibodies following natural Zika virus infection. The monomer antigen stimulates low levels of E-domain III targeting neutralizing antibodies. In a Zika challenge model, only E dimer antigen stimulates protective antibodies, not the monomer. These results highlight the importance of mimicking the highly structured flavivirus surface when designing subunit vaccines.
Subject terms: Antibodies, Protein vaccines, Viral infection
Many human antibodies that neutralize Zika virus recognize quaternary epitopes on the envelope (E) protein. Here, Metz et al. engineer stable recombinant homodimers of Zika virus E protein and show that it induces neutralizing antibodies in mice that recognize similar epitopes as human antibodies from Zika infected people.
Introduction
Zika virus (ZIKV) is an enveloped single stranded RNA virus that is transmitted by mosquito vectors. As a member of the flavivirus genus, ZIKV shares many structural features with other medically important flaviviruses such as Wes Nile virus, yellow fever virus, and dengue virus (DENV). The flavivirus envelope (E) protein is a major target of neutralizing and protective human antibodies. E oligomers form complex quaternary structure epitopes on the viral surface which are of particular importance as protective human antibodies bind to these higher order protein structures1.
ZIKV infection during pregnancy can result in neurodevelopmental defects (congenital Zika syndrome). This has stimulated work on subunit vaccines, as live attenuated and other replicating virus vaccines are contraindicated during pregnancy. However, for flaviviruses subunit vaccines based on recombinant E proteins (rE) have performed poorly in preclinical studies compared with virus or virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines2–6. In aqueous solution, flavivirus rE proteins are in a dynamic equilibrium that favors the monomer over the dimer at physiological temperature, which likely explains poor binding by potently neutralizing human antibodies targeting quaternary epitopes and the overall poor immunogenicity of these antigens in preclinical studies2,7,8.
Here, we investigate if ZIKV rE dimers are better subunit vaccine antigens than monomers. Unlike the E monomer, the dimer is recognized by strongly neutralizing mAbs isolated from ZIKV patients and the dimer, not the monomer, stimulates strongly neutralizing and protective antibodies that targeted epitopes that were similar to epitopes recognized by human antibodies following natural Zika virus infection. These results highlight the importance of mimicking the highly structured flavivirus surface when designing subunit vaccines. The flavivirus field has a long history of using E monomers as vaccine antigens with limited success. These results highlight the importance of mimicking the highly structured flavivirus surface when designing subunit vaccines, and are applicable to developing second generation subunit vaccines against Zika as well as other medically important flaviviruses like dengue and yellow fever.
Results
Expression of ZIKV rE monomers and homodimers
Here, to investigate if ZIKV rE dimers are better subunit vaccine antigens than monomers, we expressed ZIKV rE variants (aa1–402) that are monomers (rEM) or stable dimers (rED) under physiological conditions. We generated stable ZIKV rED proteins as previously described for DENV E protein by introducing a disulfide bridge (A264C) in the E-domain II interactive region of the homodimer9,10 (Fig. 1a). The oligomeric state of the purified rEM and rED proteins were confirmed by protein gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1b). The stable rED, but not the rEM, was efficiently recognized by neutralizing mAbs that have dimer-dependent quaternary footprints, such as ZIKV-specific mAbs A9E, G9E, and ZKA-230 and flavivirus cross-reactive mAbs C8 and C10 (Fig. 1c).
ZIKV rED, but not rEM, induces neutralizing antibodies
After confirming that rED was a dimer displaying native quaternary epitopes, we immunized C57BL/6 mice with 5 µg rEM, 5 µg rED, 5 µg rEM+alum, or 5 µg rED+alum and analyzed ZIKV-specific IgG and neutralizing antibody titers over time (Fig. 2a). In the absence of alum, rEM and rED induced minimal IgG titers after the initial immunization, but this response increased upon boosting (Fig. 2b, c). In the alum adjuvanted groups, high IgG titers were observed even after the prime alone, with minimal change upon boosting (Fig. 2b). Although rEM elicited ZIKV-binding antibodies in the absence of alumn, these antibodies failed to neutralize ZIKV (Fig. 2d). In contrast, non-adjuvanted rED elicited ZIKV-neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 2d). The addition of alum adjuvant elevated neutralizing antibody levels in both groups, but neutralizing titers were significantly higher after rED immunization compared with rEM. Our results demonstrate that, while both antigens stimulated ZIKV-specific IgG, the rED stimulated antibodies that are more potently neutralizing compared with the rEM stimulated antibodies.
ZIKV rED stimulates antibodies that target complex epitopes
We next performed experiments to determine if antibodies stimulated by rEM and rED antigens recognized different epitopes on the ZIKV E protein. Many flavivirus type-specific antibodies recognize relatively simple epitopes on domain III of the E protein (EDIII), whereas other type-specific antibodies recognize more complex quaternary structure epitopes displayed on E protein homodimers or higher order structures that cover the viral surface. Most EDIII-specific neutralizing antibodies have been isolated from mice immunized with inactivated flavivirus antigens11–13. In contrast, most quaternary epitope directed neutralizing antibodies have been isolated from people infected with wild-type flaviviruses7,14–17. In fact, recent studies demonstrate that neutralizing antibodies in people exposed to flavivirus infections or effective live attenuated vaccines predominantly recognize quaternary epitopes, with simple EDIII epitopes accounting for only a minor fraction of neutralizing antibodies18–22. To compare levels of EDIII directed antibodies in animals immunized with rEM or rED, we used recombinant ZIKV-EDIII conjugated to magnetic beads to deplete mouse immune sera of EDIII-binding antibodies (Fig. 3a). We tested control-depleted and EDIII antibody depleted immune sera to estimate the levels of binding (Fig. 3b) and neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 3c) in each sample targeting epitopes on EDIII. In mice immunized with rEM, ~70% (rEM group) and ~60% (rEM+alum group) of total ZIKV-specific IgG recognized epitopes on EDIII (Fig. 3b). On the other hand, significantly less EDIII-specific antibodies were induced after immunization with rED (~30% for rED and ~20% for rED+alum). The antibody binding patterns were also reflected in the ZIKV neutralization assays. The majority of neutralizing antibodies in the rEM+alum group were lost following depletion with EDIII antigen (Fig. 3c). In contrast, no loss of neutralization was observed in the animals immunized with rED or rED+alum after the removal of EDIII-binding antibodies (Fig. 3c). We conclude that the rEM antigen induces an EDIII focused antibody response that is poorly neutralizing, whereas rED antigens stimulate robust neutralizing antibody responses that target epitopes distinct from simple EDIII epitopes.
We recently isolated two ZIKV-specific strongly neutralizing human mAbs (A9E and G9E) from a person who was infected with ZIKV in 201623. These antibodies map to complex epitopes on domain I (A9E) and domain II (G9E) of ZIKV E protein23. Moreover, antibody blockade assays using these mAbs and human immune sera indicated that the epitopes targeted by these mAbs also are targeted by antibodies in immune serum from Zika patients but not dengue patients23. We used a blockade of binding (BOB) assay to test if mice immunized with rEM or rED developed antibodies that recognize A9E or G9E epitopes on ZIKV. We also tested if rEM or rED antigens stimulated antibodies that targeted the epitope of human mAb EDE C1017 which binds to a E dimer-dependent epitope that is conserved between DENV and ZIKV. Sera from mice immunized with rEM did not block binding of A9E, G9E, and C10 mAbs to ZIKV (Fig. 3d). In contrast, sera from mice immunized with rED antigen efficiently blocked binding of A9E and G9E (~80%) and partially blocked binding of EDE C10 (~35%) to ZIKV. These results demonstrate that the rED antigen and natural ZIKV infections stimulate antibodies that target similar complex epitopes on the virion. The rEM fails to induce similar antibodies and directs the antibody response to simple epitopes on ZIKV EDIII.
ZIKV rED induces protective antibodies in mice
Next, we investigated if the immune sera of mice vaccinated with rEM+alum and rED+alum could protect mice from lethal ZIKV challenge. We immunized wild-type mice as previously described (Fig. 2), and transferred heat-inactivated immune sera to Ifnar1−/− mice which are highly susceptible to ZIKV. Ifnar1−/− mice were challenged with 1000 FFU of ZIKV H/PF/2013, 1 day post serum transfer. Mice were monitored for weight loss and ZIKV induced disease, and mice were bled at days 0 (before virus challenge), 4, and 14 (Fig. 4a). The potently neutralizing mAb G9E was used as a positive control for protection against ZIKV infection23. Mice that received G9E or serum from rED+alum immunization were completely protected against weight loss and disease signs. In contrast, mice receiving rEM+alum serum exhibited significant weight loss and hindlimb paralysis (Fig. 4b). At 4 days post challenge, viremia levels in the rED+alum group were significantly reduced compared with the rEM+alum and vehicle groups (Fig. 4c), and all groups cleared viremia at day 14. We also measured ZIKV-specific IgG titers (Fig. 4d) and neutralizing antibody titers (Fig. 4e) at days 0 and 14. Mice receiving rEM+alum and rED+alum immune sera showed similar ZIKV-specific IgG titers at day 0, which were marginally higher for both groups at day 14. On the other hand, neutralizing antibody titers were higher at day 14 in the rEM+alum group, likely caused by an endogenous immune response elicited against replicating virus in these animals (Fig. 4c).
Discussion
The magnitude, sudden onset and severe clinical manifestations of ZIKV epidemics highlight the need for safe and effective vaccines for key patient populations including pregnant women. While effective live attenuated vaccines have been developed for several flaviviruses, they are contraindicated in pregnant women. Live vaccines typically are ineffective during the first year of life because maternal antibodies interfere with vaccine replication. It has been difficult to formulate tetravalent live attenuated DENV vaccines that stimulate balanced and effective responses to each serotype because of differential replication of vaccine virus components. Subunit vaccines may address some of these challenges, but progress has been slow and subunit vaccines have not performed well in non-human primate models24. Our studies offer a potential explanation for the poor performance of subunit vaccines and a strategy for developing more effective flavivirus vaccines. Our results demonstrate that a critical aspect of rE antigen design is to develop E proteins that display complex quaternary epitopes that recapitulate antigen presentation on the surface of infectious virus particles. Here we demonstrate that ZIKV rEM and rED subunit antigens induce antibody responses that differ in functionality and domain focus. ZIKV rE monomers stimulated an EDIII biased, poorly neutralizing IgG response. In contrast, ZIKV rE dimers induced strongly neutralizing and protective antibodies that also blocked the binding of strongly neutralizing human mAbs to quaternary epitopes on ZIKV. While finer mapping studies are required to comprehensively map the specificity of rED stimulated antibodies, our studies suggest that by designing the E protein to be a stable homodimer, it is possible to induce strongly neutralizing and protective antibodies that mimic properties of protective antibodies induced by natural infection. It is possible that inactivated whole virus or virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines will also stimulate antibodies to quaternary structure epitopes. An advantage to using rED-protein subunits over inactivated virion or VLP vaccines is the absence or prM protein in subunit vaccine but not virus or VLP vaccines. PrM antibodies are non-neutralizing and some studies suggest that enhance the replication of flaviviruses25. Additional studies are needed to compare the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of ZIKV rE-dimer, inactivated virus and VLP vaccines. The strategy we describe here for ZIKV E protein may also be applicable for developing subunit vaccines against other medically significant flaviviruses.
Methods
Cells and viruses
Vero-81 cells (ATCC CCL-81) were maintained in DMEM medium (Gibco) + 1% non-essential amino acids, 5% fetal bovine serum, streptomycin (100 µg per ml), and penicillin (100 U per ml) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Suspension adapted EXPI293 cells (ThermoFisher) were cultured in EXPI293 expression medium (Life Technologies). ZIKV strain H/PF/2013 was grown in Vero cells and titered by focus-forming assay using flavivirus mAb E6026,27.
Production of ZIKV rE antigens
The recombinant ZIKV E (H/PF/2013; aa1–404) monomers (rEM) and stable E dimers (rED) were expressed in the EXPI293 transient expression system (ThermoFisher) following supplied protocols. The rED was created by an A264C substitution in E-domain II and all proteins were equipped with a C-terminal 6 × His-tag. Recombinant proteins were purified as previously described28. In short, cell supernatants were concentrated by tangential filtration and proteins were affinity purified using Ni2+-chromatography columns. Pooled elution fractions were subjected to size exclusion chromatography and purified protein samples were flash frozen and stored at −80 °C.
Production of ZIKV EDIII proteins
ZIKA virus EDIII (H/PF/2013, aa302–403) was expressed as an N-terminal MBP fusion protein equipped with a C-terminal 6 × His-tag in BL21–E. coli. Cells were transformed with a pET21-MBP/ZIKVEDIII expression plasmid and expanded overnight to 100 ml cultures (LB-growth medium, supplemented with 100 µg per ml ampicillin). Overnight cultures were transferred to 1L LB-growth medium and grown to and OD600 = 0.6 at 37 °C, shaking at 225 rpm. ZIKV EDIII expression was stimulated by adding 50 mM IPTG and cells were grown overnight at 16 °C with shaking at 225 rpm. Next, cells were pelleted and lysed by high pressure homogenization. ZIKV EDIII proteins were purified from the lysate by Ni2+-affinity chromatography. Eluted fractions (50 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 10% sucrose, pH 7.0) were pooled and dialyzed overnight at 4 °C in 20 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.0 and stored at −80 °C.
Protein analysis
The oligomeric state of purified rEM and rED proteins was characterized by ELISA and SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining. For SDS-PAGE, 1 µg of rEM and rED were incubated in denaturing gel loading buffer for 10 min at 95 °C. After centrifugation, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and gels (original gel in Source Data File) were incubated with CBB stain (0.1% coomassie blue, 10% acetic acid, 50% methanol). Protein confirmations were analyzed by antigen-capture ELISA. ZIKV rEM and rED were captured on Ni2+-coated ELISA plates and subjected to binding of ZIKV-specific 2 ng per µl mAbs (A9E, G9E, and ZKA-230)23 and flavivirus cross-reactive mAbs (4G2 and 1M7)16,29.
Mouse immunizations and challenge
Female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory and used for immunizations at 6–12 weeks of age. Female A129 (B6.129S2-Ifnar1tm1Agt/Mmjax) mice were purchased from MMRRC (Mutant Mouse Resource & Research centers supported by NIH) and used in challenge experiments at 7 weeks of age. All mouse experiments were performed under protocols approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, in compliance with ethical and federal regulations (the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, Animal Welfare Act, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals).
For evaluation of ZIKV rE immunogenicity, mice were immunized subcutaneously in the flank with 5 µg soluble rEM (n = 5), 5 µg rEM + 500 µg alum (Alhydrogel, Invivogen) (n = 5), 5 µg rED (n = 5), 5 µg rED + 500 µg alum (n = 5), or PBS (n = 3). All groups received three immunizations (day 0, 21, and 63), and serum samples were collected on day 21, 28, 70, 77, 84, 91, 98, 105, and 112 by submandibular bleed.
To evaluate the protective activity of rE-induced antibodies, heat-inactivated immune sera were passively transferred to ZIKV susceptible A129 mice. Serum samples (days 70 through 112) of mice immunized with rEM + alum and rED + alum (days 70–112) were pooled and 500 µl of immune sera (per mouse, n = 5), or vehicle control serum (n = 3) was injected into A129 mice, via intraperitoneal route 1 day prior to ZIKV challenge. The ZIKV-neutralizing mAb G9E23 was used as a positive control (200 µg/mouse, n = 3). Mice were challenged with 1000 FFU of ZIKV (H/PF/2013) by subcutaneous footpad inoculation. Mice were weighed daily for 14 days and monitored for clinical disease signs. Mice losing 30% of their starting weight were humanely euthanized.
ZIKV rE-induced antibody evaluation
ZIKV-specific IgG responses were measured by antigen-capture ELISA. Briefly, ZIKV was captured on 1M7 (2 ng per µl)-coated ELISA plates and incubated with 1:50 or serially diluted mouse sera 3, 4, 10, and 16 weeks post immunization. Next, plates were incubated with alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:2500; Sigma A9044) diluted anti-mouse IgG for 1 h at 37 °C. Wells were developed using alkaline phosphatase substrate and adsorbance was measured at 405 nm. Endpoint dilution (EPD) titers where mice sera signals reached background (vehicle control) levels was determined using GraphPad Prism software.
Evaluation of neutralizing antibody responses
Neutralizing antibody titers were determined using a flow cytometry based assay. Vero-81 cells were seeded (25,000 cells per well) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Immunized mice sera was serially diluted in OptiMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 2% FBS and incubated for 45 min at 37 °C with the amount of ZIKV previously determined to infect ~15% of the cells. Cells were subsequently washed with OptiMEM and overlaid with the diluted sera/virus mix for 2 h at 37 °C. Next, the cells were washed with growth medium and incubated overnight in growth medium at 37 °C. The next day, cells were washed with PBS and detached from the plate by trypsin (Gibco). Cells were subsequently fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and washed in permeabilization buffer and blocked with 1% normal mouse serum in perm buffer for 30 min at room temperature. Following incubation, infected cells were detected by staining with Alexa-488 conjugated 1M7 mAb (5 µg per µl) for 1 h at 37 °C. Next, cells were washed in perm buffer and resuspended in 200 µl FACS buffer. The percentage of infected cells were determined using the Guava Flow Cytometer (EMD Millipore) and the neutralizing capacity was expressed as neut50 (the dilution where 50% of the virus is neutralized), calculated by GraphPad Prism software.
Depletion of EDIII-binding IgG from mouse serum
Bacterially expressed ZIKV EDIII proteins (C-terminal 6 × His-tag) were conjugated to Ni-NTA Magnetic beads (Thermo Scientific) following manufacturers protocol. In short, 1 mg of Ni-NTA beads were washed in equilibration buffer and incubated on a rotator with 60 µg of ZIKV-EDIII or MBP-His (control depletions) for 1 h at 37 °C. Next, the beads were washed in equilibration buffer and divided in two tubes for two rounds of depletions. Mouse immune serum was diluted 1:20 in PBS and incubated with magnetic beads for 1 h at 37 °C on a rotator. Following incubation, the depleted serum was separated from the beads and stored at 4 °C for subsequent IgG ELISA and neutralization assays. The percentage of ZIKV EDIII-binding antibodies was calculated by dividing the EDIII-depleted IgG titers by the control-depleted IgG titers. The percentage of ZIKV EDIII neutralizing antibodies was calculated by dividing the EDIII-depleted neut50 by the control-depleted neut50.
Human mAb blockade of binding (BOB) assay
High-binding ELISA plates were coated with 2 ng per µl 1M7 human mAb in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C. Next, plates were blocked with 3% skim milk in PBS + 0.05% Tween for 30 min at 37 °C. After blocking, plates were washed in PBS + 0.2% Tween and incubated with ZIKV H/PF/2013 for 1 h at 37 °C. The plates were washed and incubated with serially diluted immunized mouse sera for 1 h at 37 °C. Next, the plates were washed and incubated with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated A9E, G9E or C10 human mAb at 2 ng per µl for 1 h at 37 °C. Following incubation, the plates were washed and developed with AP-substrate and absorbance was measured at 405 nm.
ZIKV RNA qRT-PCR analysis
Viral RNA was isolated from 30 µl of mouse sera using the QIAmp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was eluted in RNase free MilliQ water and stored at −80 °C. For qRT-PCR, 2 µl of RNA was added to 18 µl of PCR mastermix (10 µl of iTaq universal probes mix + 0.5 µl of iScript advanced reverse transcriptase + 2 µl of forward primer (10 µM; CATGATACTGCTGATTGC) + 2 µl of reverse primer (10 µM; CCTTCCACAAAGTCCCTATTGC) + 0.4 µl of probe (IDT; 10 µM; FAM-CGGCATACA-ZEN-GCATCAGGTGCATAGGAG-IBFQ) + 6.5 µl of nuclease-free H2O). Next, samples were analyzed in a Bio-Rad CFX96 Thermocycler according to the following program: 10 min at 50 °C, 2 min at 95 °C (10 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 60 °C) × 40 cycles. RNA was isolated from a known quantity of ZIKV H/PF/2013 to generate a standard curve.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the NIH-NIAID grants 1-R01-AI107331-01 (PI A. de Silva), U19 AI109784-01 PI J.Ting), US Department of Defense grant W81-XWH-18-2-0035 (PI A. de Silva) and the European Union Zika Plan Research Consortium.
Author contributions
S.W.M. and A.T. performed the majority of experiments. A.B., J.F., and M.J.M. expressed and purified ZIKV monomer and dimer proteins. C.A.L., H.M.L., and S.T. performed the animal experiments, S.W.M., S.T., and A.M.dS. designed the study. S.W.M. wrote the paper and all authors reviewed the paper.
Data availability
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper. The source data underlying the figures are provided as a Source Data file.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Stefan W. Metz, Email: swmetz@med.unc.edu
Aravinda M. de Silva, Email: aravinda_desilva@med.unc.edu
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-12677-6.
References
- 1.Gallichotte EN, Baric RS, de Silva AM. The molecular specificity of the human antibody response to dengue virus infections. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018;1062:63–76. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-8727-1_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Larocca RA, et al. Vaccine protection against Zika virus from Brazil. Nature. 2016;536:474–478. doi: 10.1038/nature18952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Block OK, et al. A tetravalent recombinant dengue domain III protein vaccine stimulates neutralizing and enhancing antibodies in mice. Vaccine. 2010;28:8085–8094. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Midgley CM, et al. An in-depth analysis of original antigenic sin in dengue virus infection. J. Virol. 2011;85:410–421. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01826-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Williams KL, Wahala WM, Orozco S, de Silva AM, Harris E. Antibodies targeting dengue virus envelope domain III are not required for serotype-specific protection or prevention of enhancement in vivo. Virology. 2012;429:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu Y, Liu J, Cheng G. Vaccines and immunization strategies for dengue prevention. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2016;5:77–83. doi: 10.1038/emi.2016.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.de Alwis R, et al. Identification of human neutralizing antibodies that bind to complex epitopes on dengue virions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:7439–7444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200566109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Allison SL, Stadler K, Mandl CW, Kunz C, Heinz FX. Synthesis and secretion of recombinant tick-borne encephalitis virus protein E in soluble and particulate form. J. Virol. 1995;69:5816–5820. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.9.5816-5820.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Slon Campos JL, et al. Temperature-dependent folding allows stable dimerization of secretory and virus-associated E proteins of Dengue and Zika viruses in mammalian cells. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01097-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rouvinski A, et al. Covalently linked dengue virus envelope glycoprotein dimers reduce exposure of the immunodominant fusion loop epitope. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15411. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wahala WM, et al. Natural strain variation and antibody neutralization of dengue serotype 3 viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000821. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pitcher TJ, et al. Functional analysis of dengue virus (DENV) type 2 envelope protein domain 3 type-specific and DENV complex-reactive critical epitope residues. J. Gen. Virol. 2015;96:288–293. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.070813-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou Y, et al. The mechanism of differential neutralization of dengue serotype 3 strains by monoclonal antibody 8A1. Virology. 2013;439:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fibriansah G, et al. DENGUE VIRUS. Cryo-EM structure of an antibody that neutralizes dengue virus type 2 by locking E protein dimers. Science. 2015;349:88–91. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Swanstrom JA, et al. Dengue virus envelope dimer epitope monoclonal antibodies isolated from dengue patients are protective against Zika virus. mBio. 2016;7:1123–1131. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01123-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fibriansah G, et al. A potent anti-dengue human antibody preferentially recognizes the conformation of E protein monomers assembled on the virus surface. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014;6:358–371. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201303404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rouvinski A, et al. Recognition determinants of broadly neutralizing human antibodies against dengue viruses. Nature. 2015;520:109–113. doi: 10.1038/nature14130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fahimi H, Mohammadipour M, Haddad Kashani H, Parvini F, Sadeghizadeh M. Dengue viruses and promising envelope protein domain III-based vaccines. Appl. Micro. Biot. 2018;102:2977–2996. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8822-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guzman MG, Hermida L, Bernardo L, Ramirez R, Guillen G. Domain III of the envelope protein as a dengue vaccine target. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2010;9:137–147. doi: 10.1586/erv.09.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Qu P, et al. Insect cell-produced recombinant protein subunit vaccines protect against Zika virus infection. Antivir. Res. 2018;154:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang M, Dent M, Lai H, Sun H, Chen Q. Immunization of Zika virus envelope protein domain III induces specific and neutralizing immune responses against Zika virus. Vaccine. 2017;35:4287–4294. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Flipse J, Smit JM. The complexity of a dengue vaccine: a review of the human antibody response. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015;9:3749–3767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Collins, M. H. et al. Human antibody response to Zika targets type-specific quaternary structure epitopes. JCI Insight410.1172/jci.insight.124588 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Martin J, Hermida L. Dengue vaccine: an update on recombinant subunit strategies. Acta virologica. 2016;60:3–14. doi: 10.4149/av_2016_01_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Luo YY, et al. Identification of a novel infection-enhancing epitope on dengue prM using a dengue cross-reacting monoclonal antibody. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:194. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baronti, C. et al. Complete coding sequence of zika virus from a French polynesia outbreak in 2013. Genome Announc.210.1128/genomeA.00500-14 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Brien JD, Lazear HM, Diamond MS. Propagation, quantification, detection, and storage of West Nile virus. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2013;31:15D 13 11–15D 13 18. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc15d03s31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Metz SW, et al. In vitro assembly and stabilization of dengue and Zika virus envelope protein homo-dimers. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:4524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04767-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Henchal EA, McCown JM, Burke DS, Seguin MC, Brandt WE. Epitopic analysis of antigenic determinants on the surface of dengue-2 virions using monoclonal antibodies. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1985;34:162–169. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1985.34.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper. The source data underlying the figures are provided as a Source Data file.