Abstract
Long non‐coding RNA (LncRNA) MEG3 serves a regulatory role in the progression of several types of cancer, but the role of MEG3 in laryngeal cancer is still unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the regulatory role and mechanism of MEG3 in laryngeal cancer. MEG3 expression in 50 laryngeal cancer tissue samples was detected by reverse transcription‐quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‐qPCR). The effects of MEG3 overexpression on laryngeal cancer cells were investigated in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism of competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) was validated through luciferase reporter assay, RT‐qPCR and Western blotting. MEG3 was down‐regulated in laryngeal cancer tissues, and the low MEG3 expression was associated with advanced clinical stage. Additionally, MEG3 overexpression inhibited the proliferation and induced the apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Particularly, MEG3 bound to miR‐23a specifically and a reciprocal negative regulation existed between miR‐23a and MEG3. Moreover, MEG3 up‐regulated apoptotic protease activating factor‐1 (APAF‐1), a known miR‐23a's target, thereby leading to the activation of caspase‐9 and caspase‐3. Meanwhile, these activated effects were rescued by miR‐23a overexpression. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that MEG3 functions as a novel tumour suppressive LncRNA in laryngeal cancer for the first time. Furthermore, MEG3 may act as a ceRNA to regulate APAF‐1 expression by competitive binding to miR‐23a, thereby regulating the progression of laryngeal cancer.
Keywords: apoptotic protease activating factor‐1, competitive endogenous RNA, laryngeal cancer, maternally expressed gene 3, miRNA‐23a
1. INTRODUCTION
Laryngeal cancer is the highest incidence of head and neck cancer and probably accounts for 1%~5% cancer incidence worldwide.1 Smoking and alcohol are considered as common major risk factors for laryngeal cancer.2 Moreover, some researchers have found that people with a family history of cancer are also susceptible to laryngeal cancer, which implicates that genetic factors serve an important role in the occurrence and progression of laryngeal cancer.3 Growing evidence has demonstrated that some tumour suppressor genes, such as CDKN2A, TP53 and CTNNA2, are down‐regulated or inactivated in laryngeal cancer tissues and contributed to the tumorigenesis of laryngeal cancer.4, 5 Recent studies have found that long non‐coding RNAs (LncRNAs), a member of non‐coding RNA gene family, are dysregulated in laryngeal cancer tissues.6, 7 More interestingly, several LncRNAs, such as HOTAIR,8 NEAT19 and H19,10 function as oncogenes to promote the tumorigenesis of laryngeal cancer. Therefore, identifying the role of LncRNAs in laryngeal cancer may bring a novel insight into the occurrence and development of laryngeal cancer.
Maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3), located in human chromosome 14q32.3 region, has been identified as a LncRNA because its transcript lacks a significant open reading frame. MEG3 is found to be down‐regulated in cancer tissues and lost in some cancer cells.11 Moreover, MEG3 is characterized as a tumour suppressor as growing evidence that overexpression of MEG3 inhibits tumour cell growth, invasion and metastasis, induces tumour cell apoptosis and enhances tumour cell chemosensitivity.12 However, the role of MEG3 in laryngeal cancer remains unknown. Furthermore, recent study has demonstrated that MEG3 could modulate endogenous miRNAs available for binding to their target mRNAs acting as miRNA sponges, also called competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA), thereby leading to the repression of these mRNAs.13 For instance, MEG3 could modulate Bcl‐2 by competitively binding to miR‐181 to regulate gastric carcinogenesis.14 Additionally, we predicted that MEG3 could bind to miR‐23a specifically using an online bioinformatics tool (LncBase Predicted v.2)15 and our previous study has demonstrated that miR‐23a promotes the laryngeal cancer cell proliferation and induces the apoptosis by targeting apoptotic protease activating factor‐1 (APAF‐1).16 Therefore, we have been suggested that MEG3 regulates APAF‐1 expression by functioning as a ceRNA to competitively bind to miR‐23a, thereby modulating the progression of laryngeal cancer.
In the present study, the result showed that the expression of MEG3 was down‐regulated in laryngeal cancer tissues. Overexpression of MEG3 inhibited the growth, proliferation and induced the apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cell in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, MEG3 acted as a ceRNA to regulate APAF‐1 expression via competitively binding to miR‐23a.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Laryngeal cancer patients and tissue samples
A total of 50 pairs of tumour and adjacent normal tissues were collected from laryngeal cancer patients undergoing laryngectomy in the Otolaryngology Department of the No. 463 Hospital of PLA, consisting of 43 males and 7 females with a median age of 60 years (range, 39‐82 years). The clinicopathological characteristics of 50 laryngeal cancer patients were summarized in Table 1. Informed consent was obtained from each patient before this study. The histopathological diagnosis for each sample was performed by two pathologists independently. Tumour stages were determined according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumour‐node‐metastasis (TNM) staging criteria. The research protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University.
Table 1.
Features | No. of cases (%) |
---|---|
Age | |
<60 | 23 (46) |
≥60 | 27 (54) |
Gender | |
Male | 43 (86) |
Female | 7 (14) |
Smoking | |
Non‐smokers | 7 (14) |
Current smokers | 43 (86) |
Drinking | |
Drinker | 35 (70) |
Non‐drinker | 15 (30) |
Differentiation | |
Well | 15 (30) |
Moderate | 28 (56) |
Poor | 7 (14) |
Lymph node | |
Negative | 32 (64) |
Positive | 18 (36) |
Tumour extension (pT) | |
T1 | 8 (16) |
T2 | 14 (28) |
T3 | 15 (30) |
T4 | 13 (26) |
Clinical stage | |
Ⅰ | 5 (10) |
Ⅱ | 11 (22) |
Ⅲ | 31 (62) |
Ⅳ | 3 (6) |
2.2. Cell cultures and cell transfection
Hep‐2 and AMC‐HN‐8 human laryngeal cancer cell lines were obtained from Cell Biology Institute of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Science and American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), respectively. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium added with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
Maternally expressed gene 3 expression plasmid (pcDNA3.1‐MEG3) and empty pcDNA3.1 vectors were gifted from Prof. Ka‐Fai To (Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong). The details for construction of MEG3 plasmid were described in previous research.11 pcDNA3.1‐MEG3 and empty pcDNA3.1 vectors at a final concentration of 2 μg/mL were transfected into cells using Lipo2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. miR‐23a mimic and negative control (mimic NC) designed and synthesized by GenePharma Co Ltd at a final concentration of 100 nmol were transfected into cells using Lipo2000 according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were harvested and processed for further analysis after 24 or 48 hours of transfection.
2.3. RNA isolation and reverse transcription‐quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‐qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from tissues and cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). To detect MEG3 and mRNA expression, PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa) were used for reverse transcription and quantitative PCR according to the manufacturer's protocol. GAPDH was used as an internal control. To detect miR‐23a expression, Mir‐X™ miRNA First Strand Synthesis Kit and Mir‐X™ miRNA RT‐qPCR SYBR® Kit were used for reverse transcription and quantitative PCR according to the manufacturer's protocol. U6 was used as an internal control. All oligonucleotide primers were synthesized by Jinsirui Biotech Co Ltd as follows: MEG3 forward 5′‐CCTGCTGCCATCTACACCTC‐3′; MEG3 reverse 5′‐CCTCTTCATCCTTTGCCATCCTGG‐3′; APAF‐1 forward 5′‐GAAGAGAACCTGGGAGTAGATAAGG‐3′; APAF‐1 reverse 5′‐GTCGTAGCAAACCACCAAGC‐3′; miR‐23a forward 5′‐ATCACATTGCCAGGGATTTCC‐3′. The relative expression was analysed using 2−ΔΔCt method.
2.4. Ethynyldeoxyuridine (EdU) assay
Cell proliferation was detected by EdU assay. Specifically, the cells were cultured in 96‐well plates at a density of 0.6 × 104 cells/well. At 46 hours post‐transfection, cells were incubated with 20 μmol/L EdU labelling media (RiboBio) for 2 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2. After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes, the cells were stained with anti‐EdU working solution. The percentage of EdU‐positive cells was calculated after fluorescence microscopy analysis.
2.5. CCK‐8 assay
Cell proliferation was measured by CCK‐8 assay using Cell Counting Kit‐8 (KeyGEN Biotech) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Hep‐2 and AMC‐HN‐8 cells (3 × 103 cells/well) were seeded into 96‐well plates and incubated with CCK‐8 solution (10 µL/well) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 hours. The optical density (OD) value of each well was detected using a microplate reader set at the absorbance of 450 nm. The changes in cell proliferation were determined for 5 consecutive days.
2.6. Colony formation assay
After 24 hours of transfection, cells (3 × 103 cells/well) were seeded into 6‐well plates and incubated in RPMI 1640 (GIBCO) with 10% FBS. After 9 days, colonies were harvested and fixed with methanol for 30 minutes, stained with haematoxylin for 20 minutes and photographed by a digital camera (Nikon).
2.7. Cell apoptosis measured by flow cytometry
The cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry using Annexin V‐FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (KeyGEN Biotech) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Data collection and analysis were performed using flow cytometry analyser (FACSCalibur).
2.8. Hoechst staining assay
Cells were cultured in 24‐well plates that were plated with glass slides in advance and transfected with pcDNA‐MEG3 and empty vector. After 48 hours of transfection, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes and then incubated with 0.5 mL Hoechst 33342 solution (Wanlei, Shenyang, China) for 5 minutes at room temperature. After that, cells were washed twice with PBS and the changes in nuclear morphology were observed under fluorescence microscopy with 350 nm excitation and 461 nm emission. The number of Hoechst‐positive nuclei per optical field (at least 10 fields) was counted in three independent experiments and further calculated the ratio of apoptotic cell.
2.9. In vivo tumorigenicity assay
The animal experiment was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, and all care and use of animals were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. To establish tumour xenograft model, 1 × 107 Hep‐2 cells transfected with MEG3 plasmid and empty vector were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of eight 6‐week‐old Balb/c nude mice obtained from Changsheng Biological Technology Co Ltd. Tumour growth was examined every three days with callipers, and tumour volumes were calculated according to the following formula: ½ × length × width2. After 15 days of injection, the mice were killed under sodium pentobarbital anaesthesia and the xenograft tumours were resected and weighed.
2.10. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis
The xenograft tumour tissues were fixed in 4% polyoxymethylene, embedded in paraffin and made into 3.5‐μm‐thick sections. The sections were immersed in 0.01 mol/L citrate buffer (pH = 6.0) and treated with microwaves for antigen retrieval. After inactivation of endogenous peroxidase activity with 3% H2O2 and blocking of nonspecific reactions with 10% goat serum, the sections were incubated with Ki67 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and cleaved caspase‐3 (Abcam) antibody overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with an HRP‐conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. The sections were stained with the 3,3‐diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and counterstained with haematoxylin.
2.11. Luciferase activity assay
The fragment of MEG3 containing the predicted miR‐23a binding sites was amplified by PCR and thereby constructing pcDNA‐MEG3 Wt (GenePharma Co Ltd). The pcDNA‐MEG3 Mut was synthesized by mutating the target sequences in MEG3 (GenePharma Co Ltd). Then, pcDNA‐MEG3 Wt and pcDNA‐MEG3 Mut were, respectively, cloned into GV272 luciferase reporter vectors (GenePharma Co Ltd), thereby constructing GV272‐MEG3‐Wt and GV272‐MEG3‐Mut. The cells were seeded in 24‐well plate and transfected with GV272‐MEG3‐Wt and GV272‐MEG3‐Mut together with miR‐23a mimic or mimic NC. At 48 hours post‐transfection, luciferase activity was analysed using the Dual‐Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
2.12. Western blotting
The tissues and cells were smashed and homogenized with RIPA (Beyotime). After centrifugation, the supernatant containing protein was collected. Protein concentrations were measured by using the BCA protein concentration Kit (Beyotime). After 50 μg protein was denatured at 100˚C for 10 minutes, SDS‐PAGE electrophoresis was performed for protein separation, and then, the protein was transferred to PVDF membrane. The PVDF membrane was blocked by 5% skim milk for 1 hour and then incubated with specific primary antibodies, including anti‐APAF‐1 (1:1000; Abcam), anti‐cleaved caspase‐9 (1:1000; Abcam), anti‐cleaved caspase‐3 (1:1000; Abcam) and anti‐GAPDH (1:1000; Zhongshan Jinqiao Biotechnology), at 4°C overnight. The PVDF membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase labelled as goat anti‐rabbit or goat anti‐mouse immunoglobulin G (1:4000; EarthOx) at room temperature for 30 minutes. Detection of protein band was performed by using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) for Western blotting kit (Beyotime) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Relative densitometry was calculated by using Image J2x analysis software.
2.13. Statistical analysis
The SPSS 17.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Difference between two groups was evaluated using Student's t test. Difference within three or more groups was evaluated using one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and if the difference was significant, multiple comparison analysis was further performed using Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test. All P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Expression of MEG3 in laryngeal cancer tissues
To explore the expression pattern of MEG3 in laryngeal cancer tissues, 50 pairs of laryngeal cancer samples were analysed by RT‐qPCR. The result showed that MEG3 expression was significantly down‐regulated in laryngeal cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. Specifically, MEG3 expression was decreased in 74% (37 out of 50) detected sample (Figure 1A,B). Moreover, we analysed the association between MEG3 expression and clinical features. The findings indicated that the low MEG3 expression was associated with advanced clinical stage of laryngeal cancer patients (Figure 1C). However, there was no statistical difference in the MEG3 expression between lymph node metastasis group and non‐lymph node metastasis group (Figure 1D) as well as between well differentiation group and moderate/poor differentiation group (Figure 1E).
3.2. MEG3 regulated the proliferation and apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells
To investigate the effect of MEG3 on the proliferation of laryngeal cancer cells, CCK‐8 assay, EdU assay and colony formation assay were employed. The result of CCK‐8 assay showed that Hep‐2 and AMC‐HN‐8 cells transfected with MEG3 plasmid displayed a lower ratio of proliferation as compared with cells transfected with empty vector (Figure 2A), which suggested that overexpression of MEG3 inhibited the proliferation of laryngeal cancer cells in vitro. In addition, EdU assay (Figure 2B) and colony formation assay (Figure 2C) showed similar results with respect to proliferation. Next, we explored the regulation of MEG3 on the apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells using flow cytometry and Hoechst 33342 staining. The results showed that Hep‐2 (Figure 3A,C) and AMC‐HN‐8 cells (Figure 3B,D) transfected with MEG3 plasmid displayed a higher apoptosis rate as compared with cells transfected with empty vector, which suggesting that the apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells was induced by up‐regulation of MEG3. Taken together, our results suggest that MEG3 inhibits the proliferation and induces the apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells in vitro.
3.3. MEG3 regulated the growth, proliferation and apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells in vivo
We further investigated the effect of MEG3 on the growth, proliferation and apoptosis of laryngeal cancer xenograft tumour in nude mice. The results showed that the ratio of tumour growth was decreased in pcDNA3.1‐MEG3 group as evidenced by a notable decrease in tumour weight and volume (Figure 4A). Moreover, the IHC results showed that Ki67 protein expression, a cellular marker for proliferation, was also decreased in pcDNA3.1‐MEG3 group (Figure 4B). Meanwhile, the expression of cleaved caspase‐3, a marker for apoptosis, was increased in pcDNA3.1‐MEG3 group measured by IHC and Western blotting (Figure 4B,C). Taken together, these results suggest that MEG3 inhibits the growth and proliferation and induces the apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells in vivo.
3.4. Reciprocal repression of miR‐23a and MEG3
To confirm whether miR‐23a binds to MEG3 specifically, a luciferase reporter assay was employed. The result of luciferase reporter assay showed that cotransfection with miR‐23a mimic and MEG3 luciferase reporter significantly decreased the luciferase activity in Hep‐2 cells as compared with cotransfection with mimic NC and MEG3 luciferase reporter; meanwhile, the luciferase activity did not decrease by cotransfection with miR‐23a mimic and MEG3 mutant luciferase reporter (Figure 5B). This result provided a direct evidence that miR‐23a binds to MEG3 specifically. Moreover, we found that overexpression of MEG3 reduced miR‐23a expression in Hep‐2 and AMC‐HN‐8 cells (Figure 5C). Conversely, overexpression of miR‐23a could also decrease MEG3 expression in Hep‐2 and AMC‐HN‐8 cells (Figure 5D). In addition, MEG3 expression negatively correlated with miR‐23a level in laryngeal cancer samples (Figure 5E). All these data demonstrate that a reciprocal negative regulation exists between miR‐23a and MEG3.
3.5. MEG3 regulated APAF‐1 expression via miR‐23a
As APAF‐1 is a target of miR‐23a16 and miR‐23a has be demonstrated to bind to MEG3 specifically through luciferase reporter assay, the present study have been suggested that MEG3 regulated APAF‐1 expression via sponging miR‐23a. As expected, overexpression of MEG3 increased the mRNA (Figure 6A) and protein expression of APAF‐1, and subsequently led to an increase in the protein level of cleaved caspase‐9 and cleaved caspase‐3 in Hep‐2 (Figure 6B) and AMC‐HN‐8 cells (Figure 6C). However, the activation of APAF‐1, cleaved caspase‐9 and cleaved caspase‐3 by MEG3 was reversed by miR‐23a overexpression (cotransfection with MEG3 and miR‐23a mimic). These data suggest that the regulation of APAF‐1 by MEG3 is mediated by miR‐23a.
4. DISCUSSION
Maternally expressed gene 3 is an imprinted gene commonly expressed in several normal tissues, such as pituitary and cerebellum.11 However, it is usually down‐regulated in non–small‐cell lung cancer,17 breast cancer,18 hepatocellular carcinoma,19 gastric cancer,14 cervical cancer,20 oesophageal cancer,21 prostate cancer,22 nasopharyngeal carcinoma23 and gliomas,24 even lost in pituitary tumours, meningiomas and myelomas.25 The low expression of MEG3 in cancer cells and tissues is likely to be related to aberrant promoter hypermethylation.21, 25 Like most of previous researches, we found that the expression of MEG3 was generally down‐regulated in laryngeal cancer tissues. Moreover, the decreased expression of MEG3 was associated with advanced clinical stage, which was similar to Zhuo et al finding in breast cancer19 and Tian et al finding in osteosarcoma.26 Taken together, our findings suggest that MEG3 may serve as a novel biomarker for the progress of laryngeal cancer.
Maternally expressed gene 3 is initially found to be a growth suppressor in human cancer cells including HeLa, MCF‐7 and H4.11 Growing evidence has also demonstrated that MEG3 characterizes as a tumour suppressor in different types of cancer as evidence that overexpression of MEG3 could suppress the proliferation and induce apoptosis of cancer cells.14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 However, little is known about the role of MEG3 in laryngeal cancer up to date. In the present study, we found that overexpression of MEG3 inhibited the proliferation and induced the apoptosis in human laryngeal cancer cells and the similar evidence was also provided in vivo. These results were consistent with previous findings in non–small‐cell lung cancer17 and prostate cancer,22 and further suggest that MEG3 may serve as a novel tumour suppressive LncRNA to regulate laryngeal carcinogenesis.
Recent studies have illuminated that LncRNAs can function as a kind of ceRNA to interact with miRNAs and further regulate the expression of target mRNAs through sharing miRNA response elements (MREs).27 Thus, LncRNA‐miRNA‐mRNA forms a novel regulatory network at post‐transcription level.28 Considering that our previous studies have demonstrated that miR‐23a is up‐regulated and characterized an oncogene in laryngeal cancer, we firstly explored the possibility for the interaction between MEG3 and miR‐23a. The result of luciferase report gene confirmed that miR‐23a could bind to MEG3 specifically. Interestingly, we found that overexpression of MEG3 repressed miR‐23 expression and vice versa. According to this result, we inferred that there existed reciprocal repression between miR‐23a and MEG3 in laryngeal cancer. Similarly, Braconi et al reported that MEG3 and miR‐29a formed a reciprocal regulatory loop in hepatocellular cancer.29 Also, there was a reciprocal repression between MEG3 and miR‐34a in the process of hepatic ischaemia reperfusion.30 The recent studies have demonstrated that the reciprocal repression between LncRNA and miRNA displays in an Argonaute 2 (Ago2)‐dependent manner and implies that both LncRNA and miRNA might be in the RNA‐induced silencing complex (RISC).30, 31 Therefore, we inferred that this reciprocal regulation of MEG3 and miR‐23a is likely at the post‐transcriptional level involving the RISC.
Apoptotic protease activating factor‐1, a tumour suppressor, is a major target of miR‐23a verified in various types of cancer, including laryngeal cancer.16, 32, 33 In this study, we found that overexpression of MEG3 remarkably increased APAF‐1 expression. Several studies have demonstrated that APAF‐1 is the adaptor molecule which in the presence of cytosolic cytochrome c and dATP interacts with pro‐caspase‐9, resulting in the sequential cleavage and activity of caspase‐9 and caspase‐3, followed by apoptosis.34, 35 Perkins C et al have further demonstrated that overexpression of APAF‐1 promoted the oligomerization of pro‐caspase‐9, thereby enhancing the cleavage and activation of caspase‐9 and caspase‐3.36 Our data also support this by showing that the levels of cleaved caspase‐9 and caspase‐3 were enhanced along with an increasing in APAF‐1 expression by MEG3 overexpression. These results imply that MEG3 can activate mitochondrial apoptosis‐related pathway, and at least in part explain why MEG3 can induce apoptosis and inhibit the growth and proliferation of laryngeal cancer cells. Meanwhile, we found that the activations of APAF‐1 and its downstream caspases induced by MEG3 were rescued by overexpression of miR‐23a, which implicated that the regulation of APAF‐1 by MEG3 is mediated by miR‐23a. Taken together, these results support the conclusion that MEG3, miR‐23a and APAF‐1 form a ceRNA regulatory network in the progression of laryngeal cancer.
However, we must acknowledge that there existed two limitations in this study. First, although we have already demonstrated that the activations of APAF‐1 and its downstream caspases induced by MEG3 were rescued by miR‐23a, it is still not known whether the phenotype in laryngeal carcinoma induced by MEG3 was rescued by miR‐23a. Thus, more studies should be conducted to confirm what extent the phenotype in laryngeal cancer induced by MEG3 was rescued by miR‐23a. Second, besides APAF‐1, miR‐23a is found to target many apoptosis‐related genes, such as PDCD4,37 BCL238 and Fas.39 Therefore, there exists the possibility that the apoptosis rescued by miR‐23a overexpression may attribute to the regulation of these apoptosis‐related genes. However, there is not yet enough evidence in our study to confirm the possibility and we must acknowledge that this is also a limitation of our present study.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that MEG3 acts as a novel tumour suppressive LncRNA in laryngeal cancer for the first time. Furthermore, MEG3 acts as a ceRNA to regulate APAF‐1 expression via competitively binding to miR‐23a, thereby regulating the progression of laryngeal cancer. Undoubtedly, identifying the role and mechanism of MEG3 in laryngeal cancer will bring a novel insight into the progression of laryngeal cancer.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Xiaowen Zhang and Zhijie Li designed experiments. Xiaowen Zhang, Nan Wu and Jin Wang performed experiments. Xiaowen Zhang and Nan Wu wrote the manuscript. Xiaowen Zhang and Jin Wanganalysed data.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 81802698, 81472359 and 81800232), Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (Grant nos. 20180551013) and 2013 Liaoning Climbing Scholar Foundation. The authors thank Prof. Ka‐Fai To for kindly giving us MEG3 expression plasmid and empty vectors.
Zhang X, Wu N, Wang J, Li Z. LncRNA MEG3 inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in laryngeal cancer via miR‐23a/APAF‐1 axis. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:6708–6719. 10.1111/jcmm.14549
REFERENCES
- 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Menach P, Oburra HO, Patel A. Cigarette smoking and alcohol ingestion as risk factors for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2012;5:17‐24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Garavello W, Turati F, Bosetti C, et al. Family history of cancer and the risk of laryngeal cancer: a case‐control study from Italy and Switzerland. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:665‐670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Todorova TA, Jordanov SH, Stancheva GS, et al. Mutational status of CDKN2A and TP53 genes in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2015;21:413‐421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fanjul‐Fernández M, Quesada V, Cabanillas R, et al. Cell‐cell adhesion genes CTNNA2 and CTNNA3 are tumour suppressors frequently mutated in laryngeal carcinomas. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Feng L, Wang RU, Lian M, et al. Integrated analysis of long noncoding RNA and mRNA expression profile in advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0169232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Shen Z, Li Q, Deng H, Lu D, Song H, Guo J. Long non‐coding RNA profiling in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and its clinical significance: potential biomarkers for LSCC. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Li D, Feng J, Wu T, et al. Long intergenic noncoding RNA HOTAIR is overexpressed and regulates PTEN methylation in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2013;182:64‐70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wang P, Wu T, Zhou H, et al. Long noncoding RNA NEAT1 promotes laryngeal squamous cell cancer through regulating miR‐107/CDK6 pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Guan G‐F, Zhang D‐J, Wen L‐J, et al. Overexpression of lncRNA H19/miR‐675 promotes tumorigenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Med Sci. 2016;13:914‐922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zhang X, Zhou Y, Mehta KR, et al. A pituitary‐derived MEG3 isoform functions as a growth suppressor in tumor cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5119‐5126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Benetatos L, Vartholomatos G, Hatzimichael E. MEG3 imprinted gene contribution in tumorigenesis. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:773‐779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cesana M, Cacchiarelli D, Legnini I, et al. A long noncoding RNA controls muscle differentiation by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA. Cell. 2011;147:358‐369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Peng W, Si S, Zhang Q, et al. Long non‐coding RNA MEG3 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate gastric cancer progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Paraskevopoulou MD, Vlachos IS, Karagkouni D, et al. DIANA‐LncBase v2: indexing microRNA targets on non‐coding transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:231‐238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhang X‐W, Liu N, Chen S, et al. Upregulation of microRNA‐23a regulates proliferation and apoptosis by targeting APAF‐1 in laryngeal carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2015;10:410‐416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lu K‐H, Li W, Liu X‐H, et al. Long non‐coding RNA MEG3 inhibits NSCLC cells proliferation and induces apoptosis by affecting p53 expression. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sun L, Li Y, Yang B. Downregulated long non‐coding RNA MEG3 in breast cancer regulates proliferation, migration and invasion by depending on p53's transcriptional activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;478:323‐329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhuo H, Tang J, Lin Z, et al. The aberrant expression of MEG3 regulated by UHRF1 predicts the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2016;55:209‐219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Zhang J, Yao T, Wang Y, Yu J, Liu Y, Lin Z. Long noncoding RNA MEG3 is downregulated in cervical cancer and affects cell proliferation and apoptosis by regulating miR‐21. Cancer Biol Ther. 2016;17:104‐113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Dong Z, Zhang A, Liu S, et al. Aberrant methylation‐mediated silencing of lncRNA MEG3 functions as a ceRNA in Esophageal cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:800‐810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Luo G, Wang M, Wu X, et al. Long non‐coding RNA MEG3 inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37:2209‐2220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chak W‐P, Lung R‐M, Tong J‐M, et al. Downregulation of long non‐coding RNA MEG3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56:1041‐1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Li J, Bian E‐B, He X‐J, et al. Epigenetic repression of long non‐coding RNA MEG3 mediated by DNMT1 represses the p53 pathway in gliomas. Int J Oncol. 2016;48:723‐733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhao J, Dahle D, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Klibanski A. Hypermethylation of the promoter region is associated with the loss of MEG3 gene expression in human pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2179‐2186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Tian ZZ, Guo XJ, Zhao YM, Fang Y. Decreased expression of long non‐coding RNA MEG3 acts as a potential predictor biomarker in progression and poor prognosis of osteosarcoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:15138‐15142. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chan JJ, Tay Y. Noncoding RNA: RNA regulatory networks in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sen R, Ghosal S, Das S, Balti S, Chakrabarti J. Competing endogenous RNA: the key to posttranscriptional regulation. Sci World J. 2014;2014:896206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Braconi C, Kogure T, Valeri N, et al. microRNA‐29 can regulate expression of the long non‐coding RNA gene MEG3 in hepatocellular cancer. Oncogene. 2011;30:4750‐4756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Huang X, Gao Y, Qin J, Lu S. The mechanism of long non‐coding RNA MEG3 for hepatic ischemia‐reperfusion: Mediated by miR‐34a/Nrf2 signaling pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119:1163‐1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Watabe K, et al. Negative regulation of lncRNA GAS5 by miR‐21. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:1558‐1568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Shang J, Yang FU, Wang Y, et al. MicroRNA‐23a antisense enhances 5‐fluorouracil chemosensitivity through APAF‐1/caspase‐9 apoptotic pathway in colorectal cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2014;115:772‐784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Liu N, Sun Y‐Y, Zhang X‐W, et al. Oncogenic miR‐23a in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinogenesis via inhibiting APAF1. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2000‐2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Li P, Nijhawan D, Budihardjo I, et al. Cytochrome c and dATP‐dependent formation of Apaf‐1/caspase‐9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell. 1997;91:479‐489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pan G, Humke EW, Dixit VM. Activation of caspases triggered by cytochrome c in vitro. FEBS Lett. 1998;426:151‐154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Perkins C, Kim CN, Fang G, Bhalla KN. Overexpression of Apaf‐1 promotes apoptosis of untreated and paclitaxel‐ or etoposide‐treated HL‐60 cells. Cancer Res. 1998;58:4561‐4566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hu X, Wang Y, Liang H, et al. miR‐23a/b promote tumor growth and suppress apoptosis by targeting PDCD4 in gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e3059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Jin AI, Bao R, Roth M, et al. microRNA‐23a contributes to asthma by targeting BCL2 in airway epithelial cells and CXCL12 in fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 10.1002/jcp.28718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Li B, Sun M, Gao FU, et al. Up‐regulated expression of miR‐23a/b targeted the pro‐apoptotic Fas in radiation‐induced thymic lymphoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013;32:1729‐1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]