Skip to main content
BMJ Open Access logoLink to BMJ Open Access
letter
. 2019 Mar 18;78(9):1285–1286. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214860

Differing contribution of methotrexate polyglutamates to adalimumab blood levels as compared with etanercept

Thierry Dervieux 1,, Joel M Kremer 2, Michael E Weinblatt 3
PMCID: PMC6788881  PMID: 30885995

Methotrexate (MTX) is known to improve blood levels and clinical outcome to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy by reducing the formation of antidrug antibodies.1 Recent findings indicate that MTX prevents immunisation against TNF inhibitors through de novo purine biosynthesis inhibition and generation of immunosuppressive adenosine.2 This effect is mediated by activation of MTX prodrug to MTX polyglutamates (MTXPG), and we previously reported that MTXPG levels were associated with improved steady state levels of infliximab.3 In this study, we extended these observations and evaluated the impact of MTXPG on adalimumab and etanercept levels.

The study was cross-sectional by design, multicentred (three sites) and enrolled 169 consecutive consented adult rheumatoid arthritis subjects under MTX in combination with adalimumab (83 subjects) or etanercept (86 subjects). All patients enrolled were inadequate responders to MTX prior to starting anti-TNF therapy and had received MTX with anti-TNF therapy for least 3 months. At the time of a single visit, anticoagulated blood was collected randomly with respect to the last subcutaneous injection of adalimumab or etanercept. Adalimumab and etanercept levels were determined using a TNF reporter gene assay (expressed as µg/mL plasma).3 Red blood cells (RBC) MTXPG levels (up to 5 glutamic residues) were determined using liquid-chromatography (expressed as nmol/L) as described.3 C reactive protein (CRP) levels were determined using immunoturbidimetry. All subjects provided informed consent and the protocol was approved by internal review boards at each of the participating institution. Statistical analysis consisted of multivariate linear regression with anti-TNF levels as the dependent variable and RBC MTXPG3 (long-chain, the preponderant MTXPG in circulating RBCs) as the independent predictor, adjusting estimates for TNF dosage, obesity status (body mass index >30 kg/m2), CRP levels, duration of disease and previous anti-TNF usage. Estimates are reported as mean with SEs).

All 169 subjects enrolled in this study (59±1 years; 82% females) were under MTX therapy (102±5 months) and were prescribed anti-TNF therapy for 59±3 months. Mean MTX dosage was 16±0.4 mg/week, and mean RBC MTXPG3 levels were 38±2 nmol/L. CRP levels were 8.0±0.5 mg/L with 39% subjects obese. Demographics by anti-TNF groups are presented in online supplementary table 1. Mean steady state adalimumab and etanercept levels were 11.8±0.8 µg/mL and 3.2±0.2 µg/mL, respectively, while mean RBC MTXPG3 was 38±2 nmol/L and 39±2 for adalimumab and etanercept, respectively.

Supplementary data

annrheumdis-2018-214860supp001.pdf (47.7KB, pdf)

Heightened long-chain RBC MTXPG3 levels was associated with higher steady state adalimumab (p=0.01) blood levels, while there was no impact on etanercept blood levels (p=0.44) (table 1). These observations remained significant after adjusting for anti-TNF dosage, obesity status (which had a negative impact on adalimumab levels), CRP levels (which tended to associate with lower levels for both monoclonal antibodies), previous use of TNF and disease duration. Very-long chain MTXPG4-5 also associated with elevated adalimumab levels (online supplementary table 1).

Table 1.

Multivariate analysis of anti-TNF steady state blood levels in relation to MTXPG levels after adjusting for dosage, obesity status, CRP levels, disease duration and previous anti-TNF

Random
adalimumab levels
µg/mL (n=83)
Random
etanercept levels
µg/mL (n=86)
Total R2 37.0% 8.8%
Intercept 3.88±2.59 1.33±1.57
RBC MTXPG3 (nmol/L) 0.07±0.03 (p=0.01)* −0.01±0.01 (p=0.44)
Anti-TNF dose (mg/week) 0.47±0.10 (p<0.01) 0.06±0.03 (p=0.07)
BMI >30 (kg/m2) −4.26±1.33 (p<0.01) −0.18±0.49 (p=0.72)
CRP (mg/L) −0.46±0.16 (p<0.01) −0.05±0.03 (p=0.12)
Disease duration (years) 0.05±0.07 (p=0.50) −0.03±0.02 (p=0.23)
Previous anti-TNF −2.54±1.66 (p=0.13) −0.06±0.77 (p=0.94)

*Each unit RBC MTXPG3 (expressed as nmol/L) was associated with 0.09 units higher adalimumab levels (expressed as µg/mL). Estimates are given for each of the anti-TNFs as dependent variables with RBC MTXPG3, anti-TNF dose, obese status, CRP, disease duration and previous anti-TNFs as independent predictors.

BMI, body mass index; CRP, C reactive protein; RBC MTXPG, red blood cells methotrexate polyglutamate; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.

These data are consistent with the notion that MTX polyglutamation may impact infliximab and adalimumab pharmacokinetics that are immunogenic and prone to anti-idiotype antibody formation.4 Because etanercept is a fusion TNF receptor construct with little incidence of antidrug antibodies, the impact of MTX metabolism on its exposure is negligible. We acknowledge that our study was cross sectional and that the findings from this pilot study are limited steady state levels. However, our findings suggest that the optimisation of background MTX therapy and achievement of adequate MTXPG levels may potentiate the efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab in addition to facilitating dosage reduction strategies in therapeutic drug monitoring interventions.5 6

Acknowledgments

We thank Tyler O’Malley for technical assistance, and Alan Kivitz, MD, for his contribution to patient enrolment.

Footnotes

Handling editor: Prof Josef S Smolen

Presented at: This work was presented at the 2016 American College of Rheumatology meeting in Washington DC (November 11-16). [Dervieux T et al. Differing Contribution of Methotrexate Polyglutamation to Infliximab and Adalimumab Exposure As Compared to Etanercept [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differing-contribution-of-methotrexate-polyglutamation-to-infliximab-and-adalimumab-exposure-as-compared-to-etanercept/

Contributors: JMK, MEW and TD designed the study. TDervieux performed the analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests: JMK and MEW have received research grants from Exagen. TD is employed by Exagen.

Patient consent for publication: Obtained.

Ethics approval: Internal review board approved the study.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data sharing statement: none.

References

  • 1. Garcês S, Demengeot J, Benito-Garcia E. The immunogenicity of anti-TNF therapy in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1947–55. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bitoun S, Nocturne G, Ly B, et al. Methotrexate and BAFF interaction prevents immunization against TNF inhibitors. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1463–70. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dervieux T, Weinblatt ME, Kivitz A, et al. Methotrexate polyglutamation in relation to infliximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:908–10. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Krieckaert CL, Nurmohamed MT, Wolbink GJ. Methotrexate reduces immunogenicity in adalimumab treated rheumatoid arthritis patients in a dose dependent manner. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:1914–5. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. l'Ami MJ, Krieckaert CL, Nurmohamed MT, et al. Successful reduction of overexposure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with high serum adalimumab concentrations: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:484–7. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mulleman D, Balsa A. Adalimumab concentration-based tapering strategy: as good as the recommended dosage. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:473–5. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

annrheumdis-2018-214860supp001.pdf (47.7KB, pdf)


Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES