Abstract
The human ribonuclease A (hRNase A) superfamily is comprised of 13 members of secretory RNases, most of which are recognized as catabolic enzymes for their ribonucleolytic activity to degrade ribonucleic acids (RNAs) in the extracellular space, where they play a role in innate host defense and physiological homeostasis. Interestingly, human RNases 9–13, which belong to a non-canonical subgroup of the hRNase A superfamily, are ribonucleolytic activity-deficient proteins with unclear biological functions. Moreover, accumulating evidence indicates that secretory RNases, such as human RNase 5, can be internalized into cells facilitated by membrane receptors like the epidermal growth factor receptor to regulate intracellular RNA species, in particular non-coding RNAs, and signaling pathways by either a ribonucleolytic activity-dependent or -independent manner. In this review, we summarize the classical role of hRNase A superfamily in the metabolism of extracellular and intracellular RNAs and update its non-classical function as a cognate ligand of membrane receptors. We further discuss the biological significance and translational potential of using secretory RNases as predictive biomarkers or therapeutic agents in certain human diseases and the pathological settings for future investigations. 1
Keywords: ribonuclease, angiogenin, extracellular RNA, transfer RNA, ribosomal RNA, receptor tyrosine kinase
1. Introduction
The metabolism of ribonucleic acids (RNAs) is carried out by many different ribonuclease (RNases), including endoribonuclease and exoribonucleases, and plays an important role in the regulation of fundamental genes in living organisms [1, 2]. The family of mammalian RNase A is one of the most extensively studied pancreatic-type endoribonucleases. Its bovine counterpart, bovine RNase A (bRNaseA), was first extracted from the bovine pancreas in high quantities [3]. In humans, the RNase A superfamily (hRNase A) is composed of thirteen members which are broadly classified into two subgroups: canonical RNases 1–8 and non-canonical RNases 9–13. All of the RNase genes are closely located on chromosome 14 and encode secretory proteins with a hydrophobic signal peptide at the N-terminus [4, 5]. Each RNase contains six to eight conserved cysteine residues that form three to four disulfide bonds to support the three-dimensional structure [6, 7]. Sequence analysis of the human genome revealed that the amino acid sequences of non-canonical RNases 9–13 are 15–30% identical to the canonical RNase subgroup; however, several residues and disulfide bonds critical for protein folding are highly conserved, implying that all of these RNases may share a common ancestry. Phylogenetic analyses suggested that the hRNase A superfamily originates from the fifth member, hRNase5 (also named angiogenin; hereinafter referred to as hRNase5/ANG), because only an RNase 5-like gene, but not others, was traced outside the Class Mammalia [5, 8].
A catalytic triad, formed by one lysine residue (Lys; K) within a consensus motif signature (CKXXNTF) and two histidine residues (His; H), is responsible for the endoribonuclease enzyme activity via acid-base catalysis and is conserved in bRNaseA and the hRNase A superfamily members [9]. For example, the catalytic triad of bRNaseA contains the essential catalytic residues His12, Lys41, and His119, which share sequence similarity with that of hRNase5/ANG containing residues His13, Lys40, and His114 [3, 10, 11]. The canonical RNase proteins are catalytically active with ribonucleolytic activity toward standard RNA substrates to varying degrees. Among them, the ribonucleolytic activity of hRNase5/ANG is extremely weak with 105–106 times less efficient than that of bRNaseA but remains critical for its angiogenic activity [12, 13]. Contrary to the canonical RNases, the non-canonical RNases 9–13 lose ribonucleolytic activity as certain active site residues are absent by insertions, deletions, or mutations [5, 14]. The present review summarizes the processes of RNA metabolism mediated by the hRNase A superfamily, such as the degradation of extracellular RNA, the cleavage of transfer RNA, and the transcription of ribosomal RNA. The former two have been reported to require ribonucleolytic activity. In addition, we describe an ribonucleolytic activity-independent role of hRNase5/ANG acting as a ligand of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the cell membrane receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family [15], and further discuss the RNases’ potential crosstalk between RNA metabolism and membrane receptor biology (Figure 1).
Figure 1. A graphic summary of hRNase A superfamily in regulating RNA metabolism and membrane receptor biology.
Secretory hRNase1 and hRNase5/ANG are abundantly produced by endothelial cells. hRNase1 as an exRNA scavenger mainly contributes to blood vessel protection in some cardiovascular diseases. The clearance of excess exRNAs by hRNase1 administration has the potential to be a new regimen in clinical practice. Secretory hRNase5/ANG undergoes receptor-mediated endocytosis into cells by interacting with cell surface proteins, EGFR and plexin-B2. The internalized hRNase5/ANG plays a functional role in the metabolism of intracellular RNA in a ribonucleolytic activity-dependent or -independent manner. For instance, in response to cellular stress, cytoplasmic hRNase5/ANG participates in tRNA cleavage at positions close to the anticodon loop requiring ribonucleolytic activity and in turn mediates the production of 5′-tiRNA and 3′-tiRNA, leading to cell proliferation and survival. Moreover, hRNase5/ANG can be transported to the nucleolus, where it promotes rRNA transcription by binding to rDNA promoter in association with the formation of RNA Pol I pre-initiation complex. Nuclear hRNase5/ANG is also responsible for direct or indirect regulation mRNA transcription. The underlying mechanism is worthwhile to be further addressed, i.e., the involvement of the ribonucleolytic activity of hRNase5/ANG. Recently, a non-classical role of hRNase5/ANG in membrane receptor biology has been identified. Secretory hRNase5/ANG plays an oncogenic role as an EGFR ligand by binding to EGFR’s extracellular domain, activating EGFR (red stars) with tyrosine phosphorylation (p), and transmitting EGFR downstream signaling in the intracellular space. Notably, this EGFR ligand-like function of hRNase5/ANG occurs independent of its ribonucleolytic activity. Together, hRNase5/ANG-EGFR axis highlights a crosstalk of RNases between RNA metabolism and membrane receptor biology through cell surface receptor endocytosis and intracellular signal transduction. On the other hand, some RNases, such as hRNase2/EDN and hRNase3/ECP, are mainly involved in host defense against pathogens. Interestingly, among the host defense-related activities, some require the ribonucleolytic activity of RNases, such as the antiviral activity of hRNase2/EDN and hRNase3/ECP, whereas some do not, such as the antibacterial activity of hRNase3/ECP and hRNase7. Further details can be found in the main text. Not drawn to scale.
2. The hRNase A superfamily in RNA metabolism
RNA metabolism refers to the alteration of a series of distinct events in RNA molecules, including their splicing, modification, maturation, and degradation, and associates with the pathogenesis of many diseases, such as cancers and neurodegenerative diseases [16–18]. In protein synthesis of cellular organisms, messenger RNAs (mRNAs) convey genetic information to direct the assembly of proteins on the ribosomes, in which abundant and functional non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) namely transfer RNAs (tRNAs) and ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are involved. Other ncRNA types comprising functional RNA molecules include small RNAs, e.g., microRNAs (miRNAs), tRNA-derived stress-induced small RNA (tiRNA), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), and small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) as well as long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), e.g., HOTAIR [19–21]. In addition to the intracellular functions, accumulating evidence demonstrates that a group of various types of RNAs, including mRNA and most of ncRNAs, are outside of cells either in free forms or within vesicles, termed extracellular RNAs (exRNAs), which are known to serve as intercellular communicators and biomarker for certain diseases, such as cancers and cardiovascular disease [22–25]. Because each newly synthesized RNase protein contains an N-terminal signal peptide that guides its biosynthesis within the endoplasmic reticulum toward the secretory route to the extracellular space [26, 27], secretory RNases exert ribonucleolytic activity toward free forms of exRNAs for clearance. In this section, we describe the role of RNA metabolism via secretory RNases in the extracellular environment and internalized RNases in the intracellular space (Figure 1).
2.1. Human RNase 1
Human RNase 1 (hRNase1) is conventionally thought as the direct ortholog of bRNaseA based on their sequence and structure similarity [28]. However, the distinct functions between hRNase1 and bRNaseA have been reported. Raines and colleagues showed that the functional bovine homolog of hRNase1 is the brain bovine RNase, not the pancreatic-type bRNaseA. Moreover, unlike bRNaseA, which is responsible for cleavage of single-stranded RNAs, hRNase1 harbors a remarkable ability to degrade single- and double-stranded RNAs, and RNA:DNA hybrids [29–32]. hRNase1 produced by the pancreas, previously known to be essential for the digestion of dietary RNA to aid with nutrition, can be detected in endothelial cells and in many tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract, male tissues, brain, appendix, and kidney [33, 34]. Notably, hRNase1 is secreted abundantly in the circulatory system, where it can modulate the content of exRNAs circulating in biological fluids, such as blood [7, 35, 36].
2.1.1. The role of hRNase1 in exRNA clearance
exRNAs act as natural procoagulant cofactors that induce blood coagulation and upstream mediators of vascular endothelial growth factor that enhances endothelial cell permeability [37, 38]. Furthermore, exRNAs released from stressed or injured cells can elevate proinflammatory cytokines to facilitate inflammation at the site of tissue damage [39–41]. A series of studies by Preissner and colleagues suggested hRNase1 as an exRNA scavenger for vessel protection in inflammatory and ischemic cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction and atherosclerosis [25, 42, 43]. They performed an in vivo mouse model of myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and found that tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), a proinflammatory cytokine, triggers exRNA release especially under hypoxia, leading to the decline of cardiomyocyte functions, which can be prevented by hRNase1 administration [44]. The authors further determined that increased vascular hRNase1 activity accompanied decreased levels of exRNAs and TNF-α in patients who received remote ischaemic preconditioning, a clinical strategy to protect the heart against ischaemia-reperfusion injury before cardiac surgery [45], supporting a protective role of hRNase1 in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Moreover, another group of researchers demonstrated that bRNaseA administration mitigates cognitive impairment caused by hepatic ischemia reperfusion through inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines in vivo [46]. In contrast, proinflammatory stimuli, such as TNF-α and interleukin-1β, are reported to downregulate hRNase1 secretion from endothelial cells, which may in turn interfere with exRNA/hRNase1 ratio in vascular homeostasis and aggravate proinflammatory activities mediated by exRNAs [47].
The application of hRNase1 as a protective role via exRNA degradation has also been discussed in other diseases. For instance, the release of exRNA from tumor cells has the capacity to promote tumor cell progression through liberation of the cytokine TNF-α from macrophages whereas the administration of hRNase1 reduces tumor growth [48], suggesting a new regimen for cancer treatment. In addition, exRNA reduction by hRNase1 treatment prevents adhesion of rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblast to cartilage [49], and hRNase1 as an antimicrobial agent that inhibits host-derived exRNA-triggered pneumococcal infection of lung epithelial cells [50]. Together, the exRNA/hRNase1 system plays an important role in human diseases involving proinflammatory cytokines, and the clearance of excess exRNAs by hRNase1 treatment demonstrates its potential clinical benefit.
2.2. Human RNases 2 and 3
Human RNase 2 (hRNase2) and human RNase 3 (hRNase3) are derived from a common ancestor and appeared in humans evolutionarily by gene duplication [51, 52]. Although they share 67% in amino acid and 88% in nucleotide sequence homology [53, 54], hRNase2 harbors at least 10 times higher ribonucleolytic activities than hRNase3 [55, 56]. In addition, hRNase2 and hRNase3, also named eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), respectively, are two of the major secretory proteins found in the specific granules of human eosinophil, a type of white blood cells, and released upon eosinophil activation by proinflammatory stimuli [57]. Notably, these two eosinophil granule proteins were the first ones among the hRNase A superfamily members to demonstrate the role of RNase in host defense system against pathogens and innate immune responses [58–61]. During pathogenic infections, e.g., parasites, bacteria, and viruses, eosinophilic granulocytes migrate toward the infected or damaged epithelial cells in response to inflammatory mediators produced and then release a number of effector proteins, including hRNase2/EDN and hRNase3/ECP, from their granules, a process called degranulation, which contributes to host defense by neutralizing pathogens through apoptosis. Moreover, elevated eosinophil levels also occur in certain diseases, such as asthma, allergic reactions, immunomodulatory responses, and cancers [62–65]. In addition to eosinophils, low levels of hRNase2/EDN and hRNase3/ECP proteins have also been detected in other types of white blood cells, such as neutrophil, basophils, and monocytes [66, 67].
One of the best characterized biological processes of hRNase2/EDN is its broad ribonucleolytic activity-dependent antiviral activity against RNA viruses, and its role as a chemoattractant to induce antigen-presenting dendritic cell maturation and activation [67–70]. Whether hRNase2/EDN is internalized into infected cells to degrade viral RNAs remains to be determined. Similar to hRNase2/EDN, hRNase3/ECP, which has the highest cationicity among the entire hRNase A superfamily (isoelectric point = 11.4), also harbors antiviral activity [6] and unique properties of antibacterial, antihelminthic, and cytotoxic activities, suggesting that hRNase3/ECP is tightly associated with innate host defense [35, 36]. Interestingly, the antiviral and helminthotoxin effects of hRNase3/ECP require its ribonucleolytic activity whereas the bactericidal and cytotoxic effects do not [70, 71]. hRNase3/ECP was reported to bind to the bacteria cell wall components with high affinity to destabilize and permeate the lipid bilayers of bacteria, leading to bacterial cell agglutination to facilitate the efficacy of bacterial elimination [72, 73]. It is worth noting that hRNase3/ECP participates in a range of airway or bowel inflammatory diseases, such as bronchial asthma and Crohn’s disease; the concentration of hRNase3/ECP in serum has been reported to serve as a potential biomarker for asthma [74, 75].
2.3. Human RNases 4 and 5
Human RNase 4 (hRNase4) and human RNase 5 (hRNase5) were first isolated from conditioned media of HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells [76, 77]. The genes encoding hRNases 4 and 5 share the same promoter, and the two hRNases are products of differential splicing with a high sequence homology of 38.7% identity at the protein level [78–80]. Evolutionarily, hRNase4 is the most conserved gene within the hRNase A superfamily across different vertebrates [11, 81]. The three-dimensional structure of hRNase5 is unique with the presence of three instead of four disulfide bonds compared with that of other hRNase A superfamily members [6, 7]. While the two proteins both harbor ribonucleolytic activities, that of hRNase5 is significantly lower than hRNase4. The limited ribonucleolytic activity of hRNase5 is still essential for its role in angiogenesis and ncRNA cleavage [2, 8] (see next subsections). The expression of hRNase4 and hRNase5 are present in a wide range of biological fluids, e.g., blood, saliva, and seminal fluid as well as many tissues with the highest level detected in the liver [82]. Secretion of hRNase4 and hRNase5 mainly come from endothelial cells and have been reported to associate with cancer, neuronal, or immune cells [15, 83–85].
hRNase5 is also called angiogenin/ANG because of its role in promoting neovascularization and angiogenesis [86, 87]. In addition, hRNase5/ANG plays a role in innate immune response via its antibacterial and antiviral properties in host defense [27, 59]. Notably, various pathological conditions can be attributed to hRNase5/ANG [88]. For instance, a positive regulation of hRNase5/ANG in tumorigenesis has been demonstrated in many cancer types, including prostate and pancreatic cancers [8, 89]. Hu and colleagues further identified a functional role of hRNase5/ANG in hematopoietic regeneration by dichotomously promoting quiescence of stem cells and proliferation of progenitor cells [90]. Moreover, hRNase5/ANG acts a neurotrophic and neuroprotective factor in neurodegenerative diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease [91–93]. In other nonmalignant scenarios, e.g., inflammatory bowel disease and diabetes, the serum level of hRNase5/ANG is elevated in patients compared with that in healthy individuals [94, 95]. Although only a few published studies evaluating the biological functions of hRNase4 are available, researchers have shown that it shares a similar role with hRNase5/ANG in angiogenic, neuroprotective, and anti-HIV activities, suggesting that their biological properties may be complementary or supplementary [79, 84]. In this section, we provide more insights into the physiological roles of hRNase5/ANG in regulating angiogenesis and RNA metabolism, which are related to its inherently weak ribonucleolytic activity.
2.3.1. The role of hRNase5/ANG in angiogenesis
The ribonucleolytic activity-dependent angiogenic effect of hRNase5/ANG was validated in experiments using the ribonucleolytic activity-deficient mutants in which residues His13 and His114 were mutated to alanine [10, 96]. Aside from the essential ribonucleolytic activity, several mechanisms underlying hRNase5/ANG-induced angiogenesis have been well established in the past three decades [88]. First, secretory hRNase5/ANG contributes to degradation of basement membrane and extracellular matrix by binding to cell surface actin, which leads to generation of plasmin from plasminogen and activation of several protease cascades, such as matrix metalloproteinase, that promote endothelial cell migration and invasion [97, 98]. Second, after endocytosis through a putative 170-kDa protein on the endothelial cell surface [99], the internalized hRNase5/ANG triggers signal transduction cascades, such as PLC, Akt, JNK, and ERK, which are involved in cell proliferation and further angiogenesis [100–102]. Third, nuclear translocation of hRNase5/ANG is reported to be required for hRNase5/ANG-dependent angiogenesis [103, 104]. Nuclear hRNase5/ANG in turns enhances rRNA transcription in endothelial and cancer cells [105, 106] and modulates mRNA transcription via unclear mechanisms [15, 88] (see next subsections). It would be of interest to further address whether intracellular and/or extracellular RNA fragments digested by hRNase5/ANG are involved in pathological angiogenesis.
2.3.2. The role of hRNase5/ANG in rRNA transcription
Upon translocation into the nucleus, hRNase5/ANG accumulates in the nucleolus [104, 107], the site of rRNA transcription and ribosome assembly responsible for protein synthesis [108]. A series of studies by Hu and colleagues demonstrated that nuclear hRNase5/ANG plays a role in the biogenesis of rRNA and subsequently promotes the corresponding proliferation of endothelial cells as well as several types of cancer cells [105, 106, 109–111]. The authors first performed in vitro studies in endothelial cells in which exogenous hRNase5/ANG enhances the production of 45S rRNA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was then carried out through binding of hRNase5/ANG to the CT-rich repeats of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) named ANG binding elements (ABE) [105, 112]. They further demonstrated that nuclear hRNase5/ANG binds to the upstream core element (UCE) of the promoter of rDNA in vivo in hRNase5/ANG knockdown HeLa cells [113]. At the rDNA promoter, hRNase5/ANG increases the number of active rDNA copies and enhances the assembly of RNA polymerase I (Pol I) pre-initiation complex by epigenetic alteration via rDNA promoter methylation and histone modification [113]. Together, those findings supported one of the mechanisms by which hRNase5/ANG stimulates rRNA transcription through epigenetic activation of rDNA promoter. Although nuclear localization of hRNase5/ANG is essential for its angiogenic activity, which requires its ribonucleolytic activity, it remains unclear whether the enhanced rRNA transcription by hRNase5/ANG relies on its ribonucleolytic activity. Interestingly, hRNase5/ANG can catalyze the cleavage of both 28S and 18S rRNA into 100–500 nucleotides in length in vitro [114]. This suggested that hRNase5/ANG may be involved in the degradation of rRNA in addition to its function in rRNA transcription. Additional studies are warranted to further validate the role of hRNase5/ANG in rRNA degradation in vivo.
2.3.3. The role of hRNase5/ANG in mRNA transcription
Several lines of evidence to date point out a role of nuclear hRNase5/ANG in mRNA transcription. For instance, Hung and colleagues recently identified hRNase5/ANG as a new ligand of EGFR RTK (see next section) and demonstrated a global pattern of transcriptional changes induced by hRNase5/ANG treatment in pancreatic cancer cells [15]. The authors carried out next-generation RNA deep sequencing for whole transcriptome analysis to screen and identify mRNAs regulated by hRNase5/ANG. Among the top 5,000 genes, hRNase5/ANG upregulates or downregulates gene transcription similar to that of epidermal growth factor (EGF), a conventional EGFR ligand, with a high percentage of overlap (~80%) between hRNase5/ANG and EGF treatment. GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) further showed these genes to be significantly enriched by both stimuli in several gene signatures, such as EGF signaling, RAS activation, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α target, and interleukin-1α response. Accordingly, hRNase5/ANG elicits signaling events that resemble EGF to control cellular functions through regulation of mRNA transcription in pancreatic cancer cells. Moreover, Sheng and Xu described that a total of 699 genes performed by ChIP-on-chip assay may be regulated by hRNase5/ANG and significantly associated with tumorigenesis, Wnt signaling, and transforming growth factor-β pathways using KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) analysis [88]. Given that hRNase5/ANG can interact with histone H3 and remodel the histone modification [113], it may serve as a chromatin remodeling activator in regulating mRNA transcription, although the underlying mechanistic regulation needs to be further pursued.
2.3.4. The role of hRNase5/ANG in tRNA cleavage and tiRNA production
In addition to the nuclear function of hRNase5/ANG in RNA metabolism, two groups of researchers showed that hRNase5/ANG is also responsible for ribonucleolytic activity-dependent endonucleolytic cleavage of tRNA in the cytoplasm [115, 116]. Under certain insults of cellular stress, e.g., nutrition deficiency, oxidative stress, or hypothermia, the activated hRNase5/ANG stimulates the formation of cytoplasmic stress granules, cleaves tRNA at positions close to the anticodon loop, and mediates the production of tRNA-derived stress-induced small RNA (tiRNA) [87, 117, 118]. The tiRNA fragments in turn enhance damage repair and cellular survival by suppressing the formation of the translation initiation factor complex or associating with the translational silencer, leading to global protein translational arrest, which functions in a cytoprotective stress response program [116, 119, 120]. Interestingly, after respiratory syncytial virus infection, hRNase5/ANG mediates tRNA cleavage, which induces the production of tiRNA fragments that are important molecules for viral replication [121]. The levels of tiRNA are elevated in some cancer cells, such as breast and myeloma [122]. For example, in breast cancer cells, hRNase5/ANG produces tiRNA fragments to stimulate cell proliferation which is dependent on the sex hormones and their receptors [123]. Notably, ncRNA metabolism of tiRNA and rRNA contributes to hRNase5/ANG-activated hematopoietic regeneration by simultaneously enhancing tiRNA production in stem cells and rRNA biogenesis in progenitor cells [90].
The process of hRNase5/ANG-mediated tiRNA production is precisely controlled by its cytoplasmic endogenous inhibitor, ribonuclease/angiogenin inhibitor 1 (RNH1) [124–126]. Pizzo et al. demonstrated that under growth conditions, hRNase5/ANG tightly associates with RNH1 in the cytoplasm, preventing it from random cleavage of cellular RNA. In contrast, under stress conditions, cytoplasmic hRNase5/ANG dissociates from RNH1, activating its ribonucleolytic activity to degrade tRNA, leading to tiRNA production [127]. Furthermore, the stress-induced stress granule assembly by hRNase/ANG is abrogated in cells transfected with RNH1 [120]. Although the mechanism of stress-induced hRNase5/ANG dissociation from RNH1 requires further investigation, cytoplasmic hRNase5/ANG has been shown to evade RNH1 and nuclear transport via protein kinase C- and cyclin-dependent kinase-mediated phosphorylation [128].
Collectively, these studies have highlighted the contribution of cellular hRNase5/ANG to angiogenesis and RNA metabolism pathways by either a ribonucleolytic activity-dependent or independent manner (Table 1). Interestingly, researchers have found that motoneurons secrete hRNase5/ANG under stress, which leads to hRNase5/ANG uptake in a paracrine manner by astrocytes, where it induces cleavage of an unknown subsets of RNAs [129], suggesting that hRNase5/ANG may have other undiscovered RNA substrates for its biological function. Whether hRNase5/ANG participates in the metabolism of other RNAs is worthwhile to be further elucidated.
Table 1.
Summary of ribonucleolytic activity-dependent and -independent biological activities of RNases
RNase | Ribonucleolytic activity-dependent | Ribonucleolytic activity-independent | Undefined on ribonucleolytic activity |
---|---|---|---|
hRNase1 | • exRNA degradation | n/a | n/a |
hRNase2/EDN | • antiviral activity | n/a | • chemotactic activity |
hRNase3/ECP | • antiviral activity • antihelminthic activity |
• antibacterial activity • cytotoxic activity |
n/a |
hRNase4 | n/a | n/a | • neuroprotective activity |
hRNase5/ANG | • angiogenic activity • rRNA degradation • tRNA cleavage |
• EGFR binding • EGFR signaling activation • EMT • plexin-B2 binding • rRNA transcription |
• neuroprotective activity • mRNA transcription |
hRNase6/k6 | • antiviral activity | • antibacterial activity • antimicrobial activity |
n/a |
hRNase7 | n/a | • antibacterial activity • antimicrobial activity • antifungal activity |
n/a |
hRNase8 | n/a | n/a | • antimicrobial activity |
hRNase9 | n/a | • antibacterial activity | n/a |
hRNases10–13 | n/a | • potential host defense activities | n/a |
2.4. Human RNases 6–8
Among the hRNase A superfamily members, human RNase 6 (hRNase6) is more evolutionarily closely related to human RNase 7 (hRNase7) and human RNase 8 (hRNase8); hRNase7 and hRNase8 have been suggested to originate from a recent gene duplication with a remarkable similarity in their amino acid sequences (78% identity) [7]. Although they are a related gene pair, hRNase7 and hRNase8 exert their physiological functions in a tissue-specific fashion [6, 12] (see description below). The ribonucleolytic activities of hRNases 6–8 against yeast tRNA are relatively weak compared with those of the canonical hRNases with the exception of hRNase5/ANG; among them, hRNase8 harbors the lowest ribonucleolytic activity [6, 12].
hRNase6, also named RNase k6, was first identified from a genomic search for a human ortholog of bovine kidney RNase (RNase k2), which shares 72% sequence identity with hRNase6 [130]. The crystal structure of hRNase6 has been determined [131], and most recently, it revealed a second catalytic triad proposed to favor endonuclease cleavage specificity that facilitates polynucleotide substrate catalysis [132]. Notably, hRNase6 is derived from the bone marrow by myeloid cells, such as monocytes and neutrophils, upon bacterial infection [130], suggesting a physiological role in host defense, which was recently validated to show that hRNase6 possesses antiviral activity by inhibiting HIV replication via viral RNA degradation [133]. hRNase6 also exhibits antimicrobial activity against different uropathogenic bacterial strains in the urinary tract via a membrane destabilizing mechanism of action similar to that of hRNase3/ECP [134, 135].
hRNase7 was first detected and purified as the most abundant RNase from the human skin [58] and is found in a range of other epithelial tissues, such as the kidney as well as the respiratory, urinary, and gastrointestinal tracts [26, 136, 137]. Although hRNase7 possesses limited antiviral activity, it harbors broad spectrum microbicidal activity against various microorganisms, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as certain fungal species [138]. It is one of the major antimicrobial proteins secreted by skin cells, keratinocytes, which play a role in wound healing and tissue repair involving cutaneous host defense and epidermal protection [139–141]. While the mechanism underlying the antimicrobial properties of hRNase7 is not fully understood, it resembles hRNase3/ECP in that its microbicidal activity occurs independently of its ribonucleolytic activity, and instead relies on its ability to permeate the bacterial cell wall by acting as a membrane-disruptive antimicrobial peptide [73, 142]. It has been proposed that hRNase7 contains positively charged residues with clustered lysine at the N-terminus for interaction with negatively charged components on bacterial surface to facilitate its cell permeabilization and rapid leakage of cytoplasmic components [143]. Moreover, hRNase7 was reported to be bound with a bacterial cell surface receptor called outer membrane protein I which can be internalized into cells where it mediates the antimicrobial function of hRNase 7 by triggering cell death [144, 145]. It is worth noting that hRNase7 is upregulated in chronic inflammatory skin diseases, in which it selectively decreases the TH2 cytokines produced by activated T cells in lesioned skin of patients [35, 146–148], suggesting that hRNase7 may contribute to immunomodulation in cutaneous wound healing [140].
In contrast to hRNase7, hRNase8 is expressed primarily in the placenta [12] and exhibits significant antimicrobial activities against many pathogenic bacteria [149]. It has been proposed that hRNase8 plays a role in placental host defense in the amniotic fluid of pregnant women, where hRNase8 eliminates pathogenic infection from the maternal circulation to preserve amniotic cavity sterility for the fetus [7, 27]. Additional studies are required to further verify this proposed mechanism. Interestingly, hRNase8 displays an atypical structure among the hRNase A superfamily members due to a unique extension at its N-terminus, which does not represent a classical secretory mediator, suggesting that it may not undergo the secretion process [36, 150].
Taken together, the above three RNases are the last identified canonical members of the hRNase A superfamily, all of which harbor detectable ribonucleolytic activities as well as host defense-related antibacterial and antimicrobial properties. However, the precise physiological roles and mechanisms of actions involved remain unclearly defined. It would be worthwhile to further explore; for example, whether their ribonucleolytic activities participate in the processes of RNA metabolism that may link to their tissue-specific functions (Table 2).
Table 2.
Summary of main tissue-specific expression and functions of RNases
RNase | Main expression (tissues/cells) | Specific biological functions |
---|---|---|
hRNase1 | • pancreas • endothelial cells |
• anti-coagulation • anti-inflammation • vascular homeostasis |
hRNase2/EDN | • bone marrow • eosinophils |
• host defense/innate immunity |
hRNase3/ECP | • bone marrow • eosinophils |
• host defense/innate immunity • a potential biomarker in asthma |
hRNase4 | • liver • endothelial cells |
• angiogenesis • neuroprotection |
hRNase5/ANG | • liver • endothelial cells • cancer cells |
• angiogenesis • neuroprotection • host defense/innate immunity • tumorigenesis • an EGFR ligand • a predictive biomarker for EGFR-targeted therapy • hematopoietic regeneration |
hRNase6/k6 | • bone marrow • monocytes • neutrophils |
• host defense/innate immunity |
hRNase7 | • skin epidermis • keratinocytes • epithelial tissues/cells |
• host defense/innate immunity • immunomodulation |
hRNase8 | • placenta | • placental host defense |
hRNase9 | • male tissues (epididymis) | • male reproductive functions • sperm maturation |
hRNase10 | • male tissues (epididymis) | • male reproductive functions |
hRNase11 | • male tissues (testis) | • male reproductive functions |
hRNase12 | • male tissues | • male reproductive functions |
hRNase13 | • male tissues | • male reproductive functions |
2.5. Human RNases 9–13
The hRNase A superfamily expanded following the discovery of human RNases 9–13 and is classified into two subgroups: canonical (RNases 1–8) and non-canonical (RNases 9–13) [5]. The non-canonical RNases share the three most conserved disulfide bonds and one secretion signal peptide with the canonical members. Nevertheless, the non-canonical RNases do not contain the consensus signature motif (CKXXNTF) of the catalytic triad and likely fall short of ribonucleolytic activity because certain active site residues are encoded by insertions, deletions, or mutations [5, 14, 36]. It has been postulated that the non-canonical members, such as hRNase9, may play a role similar to the canonical RNases in innate host defense [151]. Indeed, researchers demonstrated that hRNase9 lacking intrinsic ribonucleolytic activity exhibits bactericidal activity against E. coli. in a dose-dependent manner [152]. Similar to the ribonucleolytic activity-independent antimicrobial function of other hRNases, e.g., hRNase3/ECP and hRNase7, the membrane destabilizing mechanism of action of hRNase9 to enter bacterial cells and induce cell death is attributed to the presence of its positively charged residues [152]. Notably, all of the non-canonical RNases are expressed in the male reproductive tract, specifically hRNase9 and hRNase10 in the epididymis, and hRNase11 in the testis, and associated with male reproductive functions [5, 14, 153, 154] (Table 2). The expression of hRNase9 and hRNase10 are regulated by androgens or other testicular factors, both of which have been suggested as putatively new members of epididymal proteins involved in host defense [155]. In addition, hRNase9 plays a critical role in sperm maturation as evidence by Rnase9-knockout mice resulting in impaired sperm maturation [156]. To date, little is known about the physiological functions of the non-canonical RNase subgroup. Further systematic studies are awaited to address whether these ribonucleolytic activity-deficient RNases play non-classical roles to associate with certain intrinsic functions other than ribonucleolytic activities. Based on the growing body of evidence, a ribonucleolytic activity-independent function of secretory RNases could be a general feature among the entire hRNase A superfamily. In the next section, we describe this ribonucleolytic activity-independent function using hRNase5/ANG in membrane receptor biology as an example in which hRNase5/ANG acts as a newly-identified ligand of EGFR RTK and serves as a serum biomarker for prediction of clinical response to EGFR-targeted therapy (Figure 2).
Figure 2. The proposed model of elevated ANG as an EGFR ligand in the sensitization to erlotinib therapy in pancreatic cancer.
In brief, higher levels of ANG induce its binding to EGFR and activate EGFR signaling, which in turn promotes tumorigenesis and increases erlotinib sensitivity in PDAC patients [15]. (This research was originally published in Cancer Cell. Wang YN, Lee HH, Chou CK, Yang WH, Wei Y, Chen CT, Yao J, Hsu JL, Zhu C, Ying H, Ye Y, Wang WJ, Lim SO, Xia W, Ko HW, Liu X, Liu CG, Wu X, Wang H, Li D, Prakash LR, Katz MH, Kang Y, Kim M, Fleming JB, Fogelman D, Javle M, Maitra A, and Hung MC. Angiogenin/ribonuclease 5 is an EGFR ligand and a serum biomarker for erlotinib sensitivity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018; 33(4):752–769.e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.02.012 © 2018 Elsevier Inc.)
3. Human RNase 5 in membrane receptor biology
In 1997, a putative 170-kDa cell membrane receptor was reported to facilitate the internalization of hRNase5/ANG into endothelial cells [99]. Recently, Hung and colleagues demonstrated that hRNase5/ANG functions as an EGFR ligand via a direct association with EGFR to convey EGFR downstream signaling intracellularly in cancer cells [15]. It is conceivable that EGFR may be the 170-kDa cell membrane receptor from endothelial cells as it has a molecular weight of 170-kDa. Notably, this EGFR ligand-like function of hRNase5/ANG does not require its ribonucleolytic activity. Their findings opened a direction toward our understanding of the non-classical roles of RNases independently of their ribonucleolytic activities.
3.1. The ribonucleolytic activity-independent role of hRNase5/ANG as an EGFR ligand
Wang and Lee et al. [15] initially sought to investigate whether exRNAs, which are known to function as pleiotropic molecules for intercellular communication to modulate biological functions, can regulate membrane receptor signaling cascades and cellular processes [22, 157]. They performed a pilot experiment by treating cells with bRNaseA in cultured media to broadly degrade RNA species in the extracellular space [3]. Interestingly, they found that bRNaseA treatment can increase cell viability, migration and invasion, and induce changes in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like phenotype. Cancer cell lines treated with bRNaseA displayed significant increases in the global tyrosine phosphorylation signals, particularly in the range of bands between ~150–250 kDa, which corresponds to molecular weight of an RTK. Using human antibody arrays for phospho-RTKs and phospho-kinases, they identified EGFR RTK as the dominant cell membrane target and several well-recognized EGFR downstream molecules, such as ERK1/2 and Akt, in response to bRNaseA. Through a series of biochemical and biological assays, the authors revealed that bRNaseA and its human counterpart, hRNase5/ANG, act as a ligand of EGFR by binding to EGFR’s extracellular domain and transmitting EGFR intracellular signaling. Moreover, the binding epitope of hRNase5/ANG to EGFR appeared to partially overlap with the EGFR binding region to EGF. It would be important and worthwhile to further pursue a more detailed structural determination, i.e., the direct contact between hRNase5/ANG and EGFR, for a better understanding of this newly-discovered ligand-receptor relationship [89].
Interestingly, the moonlighting ligand-like function of bRNaseA and hRNase5/ANG does not require their ribonucleolytic activities as exRNAs are not involved [15]. The authors generated ribonucleolytic activity-deficient mutants of bRNaseA in which residues Lys41 and His119 were mutated to alanine and observed similar patterns with the wild-type bRNaseA in morphological changes as well as EGFR activation and binding. Consistent results of comparable EGFR activation and binding were also shown in the wild-type and ribonucleolytic activity-deficient counterparts of hRNase5/ANG in which residues Lys40 and His114 were mutated to alanine. Those findings indicated a ribonucleolytic activity-independent role of bRNaseA and hRNase5/ANG as an EGFR ligand, and raised an interesting question of whether other members of the hRNase A superfamily may also have similar functions serving as a cognate ligand of cell membrane RTK, especially the non-canonical RNases 9–13 without ribonucleolytic activities [14]. A systematic study is required to uncover the potential ligand-like functions of the other RNases. Apart from EGFR, a cell surface protein termed plexin-B2 was indicated as a functional receptor of hRNase5/ANG in various cell types, including endothelial, cancer, neuronal, and normal and malignant stem and progenitor cells [85]. Blocking hRNase5/ANG interaction with plexin-B2 by competition with a plexin-B2 monoclonal antibody inhibits hRNase5/ANG-dependent physiological and pathological functions [85], suggesting that modulation of hRNase5/ANG activities by targeting plexin-B2 may have therapeutic potential [85]. Collectively, these recent studies highlight the importance of hRNase5/ANG in human disease progression and a critical role overlooked in membrane receptor biology.
3.2. The role of hRNase5/ANG as a serum biomarker for EGFR-targeted therapy
EGFR and its derived network are well known to play an oncogenic role in modulating tumor cell behavior, including pancreatic cancer. The initiation of KRAS-driven pancreatic tumorigenesis requires EGFR and its downstream signaling [158, 159]. The frequency of EGFR overexpression is about 30% to 95% in pancreatic cancer [160], and accumulating evidence shows that EGFR expression level and its activation are positively correlated with liver metastasis and pancreatic metaplasia [161–164]. Together, EGFR is closely associated with tumor initiation, development, and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. In clinical settings, EGFR has been considered an effective rational target for anticancer therapies [165, 166]. Nevertheless, even though an EGFR small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib was approved to treat patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, only marginal improvement in a group of responsive population was observed [167]. An EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) cetuximab also did not improve the outcome in pancreatic cancer patients compared with those treated with gemcitabine alone [168]. Thus, pancreatic cancer continues to be one of the most lethal human malignancies without effective therapeutics, and the identification of any predictive biomarkers for a subpopulation of pancreatic cancer patients who may be more likely to respond to erlotinib to increase treatment efficacy is critically needed [169–171].
Elevated serum level of hRNase5/ANG has been shown to correlate with poorer survival in pancreatic cancer patients [172]. Consistently, Wang and Lee et al. [15] found that plasma hRNase5/ANG was significantly increased in pancreatic cancer patients compared with healthy individuals whereas no significant differences were observed between these two groups in levels of conventional EGFR ligands, EGF and transforming growth factor-α. The authors validated a pathological relevance of the hRNase5/ANG-EGFR relationship by a positive correlation between hRNase5/ANG level and EGFR activation in human pancreatic tissue microarrays. Moreover, increased level of murine RNase5 and EGFR activation are associated with tumor development in the KrasG12D-driven transgenic mouse model of pancreatic cancer [15, 173]. They further demonstrated in vitro and in vivo that hRNase5/ANG through activation EGFR phosphorylation renders pancreatic cancer cells more addicted to the EGFR pathway and more sensitive to EGFR TKI erlotinib treatment. This oncogene addiction effect is further supported by a retrospective study of a cohort of pancreatic cancer patients in which patients with high concentrations of plasma hRNase5/ANG responded well to erlotinib treatment [15]. This implies that hRNase5/ANGhigh status has the potential to serve as an effective serum biomarker to predict erlotinib response, which can stratify pancreatic cancer patients who would be more responsive to EGFR-targeted therapy, and improve precision medicine. In addition to pancreatic cancer, it would be worthwhile to further evaluate hRNase5/ANG as a predictive biomarker for EGFR-targeted therapy therapies in patients with other types of hRNase5/ANGhigh-EGFR+ tumors, and apply to potential serum biomarker-guided treatment opinions (Figure 2).
4. Concluding remarks and future perspective
A general role of secretory RNases is to eliminate cellular self-RNA and/or pathogenic non-self RNA species in the extracellular space to prevent infection by pathogens and autoimmune responses [7, 35, 36]. On the other hand, through interaction with cell surface receptors, secretory RNases undergoing membrane engulfment and endocytosis can be transported into the cytoplasm and nucleus, and regulate both protein-coding and non-protein-coding RNA levels [2, 88]. The ribonucleolytic activity of intracellular RNases in mediating RNA metabolism is precisely controlled by the cytoplasmic endogenous inhibitor, RNH1 [127]. Notably, emerging evidence indicates that the ribonucleolytic activity of RNases is required for some but not all of their biological functions. Certain RNases, including the non-canonical RNases 9–13 lacking intrinsic ribonucleolytic activity, have been found to suppress pathogenic invasion and contribute to innate immunity independently of their ribonucleolytic activities [6]. In this review, we summarized the contribution of hRNase A superfamily to extracellular and intracellular RNA metabolism (Table 1), such as vessel protective role of hRNase1 by exRNA degradation, proliferation-promoting activity of hRNase5/ANG by rRNA transcription in the nucleus, and pro-survival activity by tiRNA production in the cytoplasm.
Here, we also summarized a newly identified ribonucleolytic activity-independent function of hRNase5/ANG as a cognate ligand of cell membrane EGFR RTK. Wang and Lee et al. demonstrated the translational potential of hRNase5/ANG to serve as a serum biomarker to stratify pancreatic cancer patients for effective treatment with EGFR TKI erlotinib [15]. In addition to hRNase5/ANG, hRNase3/ECP has also been extensively studied as a potential serum biomarker for patients with airway inflammation, such as asthma [74, 75], albeit the information regarding its mechanism and clinical usefulness is limited. The treatment of hRNase1 was reported to have potential clinical benefit through the clearance of excess exRNA for blood vessel protection in cardiovascular diseases [25]. It would be of interest to further investigate secretory RNases as non-invasive biomarkers or therapeutic agents in clinical practice.
It is worth noting that a unique subset of 11 out of the 20 cell surface RTK families, termed membrane receptors in the nucleus (MRIN), can be found in the nucleus, including members of the ErbB RTK family, e.g., EGFR and ErbB2 [174, 175]. Nuclear EGFR and ErbB2 are two of the best-studied RTKs in the MRIN field, known to act as a transcriptional co-activator, a protein kinase, and a protein interactor, and participate in different cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, DNA replication, DNA damage repair, and resistance to anticancer therapies [176–178]. A series of studies by Hung and colleagues showed that EGFR and ErbB2 play a role in the nucleus in cooperation with multiple nuclear proteins; for instance, EGFR transduces signal to chromatin by directly interacting with and phosphorylating histone H4 at a tyrosine residue Tyr72, which in turn regulates DNA synthesis and repair [179]. In addition, they found that nuclear ErbB2 enhances rRNA gene transcription through a physical association with rDNA, RNA Pol I, and β-actin, which promotes translation and cell growth [180]. Considering the nuclear roles of hRNase5/ANG in regulating histone modification and rRNA transcription [105, 106, 113], the two originally remoted studies seem to potentially link to each other. For instance, the association between EGFR and its ligand, hRNase5/ANG, may also form a complex in the nucleus and at least in part contribute to the above-mentioned biological functions. More studies toward this area may open a new era in cell biology to understand the functions of these ligand-receptor pairs in the nucleus.
Collectively, these findings highlight a crosstalk between RNases in regulating RNA metabolism, in particular hRNase5/ANG, and its newly-identified ligand-like role in membrane receptor biology through membrane receptor endocytosis and intracellular signal transduction (Figure 1). Furthering our understanding of classical and non-classical roles of the hRNase A superfamily will deepen our knowledge of the fundamentals of RNase biology and open a new avenue in the area of biomarker-guided treatment as well as the potential therapeutic implications using RNases.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the following: MDA Startup Fund; The University of Texas MD Anderson-China Medical University and Hospital Sister Institution Fund; Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF-17-069); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Multi-Investigator Research Awards; RP160710); T32 Training Grant in Cancer Biology (5T32CA186892 to H.-H.L.); and Center for Biological Pathways.
List of abbreviations
- RNase
ribonuclease
- ANG
angiogenin
- EDN
eosinophil-derived neurotoxin
- ECP
eosinophil cationic protein
- exRNA
extracellular RNA
- tRNA
transfer RNA
- rRNA
ribosomal RNA
- rDNA
ribosomal DNA
- ABE
ANG binding elements
- UCE
upstream core element
- tiRNA
tRNA-derived stress-induced small RNA
- RNH1
ribonuclease/angiogenin inhibitor 1
- RTKs
receptor tyrosine kinases
- EGFR
epidermal growth factor receptor
- EGF
epidermal growth factor
- EMT
epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- Pol I
polymerase I
- ChIP
chromatin immunoprecipitation
- mAb
monoclonal antibody
- TKI
tyrosine-kinase inhibitor
- MRIN
membrane receptors in the nucleus
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of Interests
The authors declare that they have no non-financial and financial competing interests.
References
- 1.Tomecki R and Dziembowski A, Novel endoribonucleases as central players in various pathways of eukaryotic RNA metabolism. RNA, 2010. 16(9): p. 1692–724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lyons SM, et al. , RNA biology of angiogenin: Current state and perspectives. RNA Biol, 2017. 14(2): p. 171–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Raines RT, Ribonuclease A Chem Rev, 1998. 98(3): p. 1045–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lander ES, et al. , Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 2001. 409(6822): p. 860–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cho S, Beintema JJ, and Zhang J, The ribonuclease A superfamily of mammals and birds: identifying new members and tracing evolutionary histories. Genomics, 2005. 85(2): p. 208–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang J, Dyer KD, and Rosenberg HF, Human RNase 7: a new cationic ribonuclease of the RNase A superfamily. Nucleic Acids Res, 2003. 31(2): p. 602–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Koczera P, et al. , The Ribonuclease A Superfamily in Humans: Canonical RNases as the Buttress of Innate Immunity. Int J Mol Sci, 2016. 17(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vanli N and Guo-Fu HU, Mechanism and Function of Angiogenin in Prostate Cancer. 2015. 31(12): p. 1261–1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marshall GR, Feng JA, and Kuster DJ, Back to the future: ribonuclease A. Biopolymers, 2008. 90(3): p. 259–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shapiro R and Vallee BL, Site-directed mutagenesis of histidine-13 and histidine-114 of human angiogenin. Alanine derivatives inhibit angiogenin-induced angiogenesis. Biochemistry, 1989. 28(18): p. 7401–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goo SM and Cho S, The expansion and functional diversification of the mammalian ribonuclease a superfamily epitomizes the efficiency of multigene families at generating biological novelty. Genome Biol Evol, 2013. 5(11): p. 2124–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang J, Dyer KD, and Rosenberg HF, RNase 8, a novel RNase A superfamily ribonuclease expressed uniquely in placenta. Nucleic Acids Res, 2002. 30(5): p. 1169–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tello-Montoliu A, Patel JV, and Lip GY, Angiogenin: a review of the pathophysiology and potential clinical applications. J Thromb Haemost, 2006. 4(9): p. 1864–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sorrentino S, The eight human “canonical” ribonucleases: molecular diversity, catalytic properties, and special biological actions of the enzyme proteins. FEBS Lett, 2010. 584(11): p. 2194–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang YN, et al. , Angiogenin/Ribonuclease 5 Is an EGFR Ligand and a Serum Biomarker for Erlotinib Sensitivity in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Cell, 2018. 33(4): p. 752–769 e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Johnson DL and Johnson SA, Cell biology. RNA metabolism and oncogenesis. Science, 2008. 320(5875): p. 461–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pereira B, Billaud M, and Almeida R, RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer: Old Players and New Actors. Trends Cancer, 2017. 3(7): p. 506–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu EY, Cali CP, and Lee EB, RNA metabolism in neurodegenerative disease. Dis Model Mech, 2017. 10(5): p. 509–518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim VN, Han J, and Siomi MC, Biogenesis of small RNAs in animals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2009. 10(2): p. 126–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fabian MR, Sonenberg N, and Filipowicz W, Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu Rev Biochem, 2010. 79: p. 351–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.St Laurent G, Wahlestedt C, and Kapranov P, The Landscape of long noncoding RNA classification. Trends Genet, 2015. 31(5): p. 239–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li K, et al. , Advances, challenges, and opportunities in extracellular RNA biology: insights from the NIH exRNA Strategic Workshop. JCI Insight, 2018. 3(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tsatsaronis JA, et al. , Extracellular Vesicle RNA: A Universal Mediator of Microbial Communication? Trends Microbiol, 2018. 26(5): p. 401–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ruhen O and Meehan K, Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel source of protein biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and monitoring. Proteomics, 2018: p. e1800155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zernecke A and Preissner KT, Extracellular Ribonucleic Acids (RNA) Enter the Stage in Cardiovascular Disease. Circ Res, 2016. 118(3): p. 469–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Becknell B and Spencer JD, A Review of Ribonuclease 7’s Structure, Regulation, and Contributions to Host Defense. Int J Mol Sci, 2016. 17(3): p. 423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gupta SK, et al. , The mammalian secreted RNases: mechanisms of action in host defence. Innate Immun, 2013. 19(1): p. 86–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Peracaula R, et al. , Human pancreatic ribonuclease 1: expression and distribution in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer, 2000. 89(6): p. 1252–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eller CH, Lomax JE, and Raines RT, Bovine brain ribonuclease is the functional homolog of human ribonuclease 1. J Biol Chem, 2014. 289(38): p. 25996–6006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lomax JE, Eller CH, and Raines RT, Comparative functional analysis of ribonuclease 1 homologs: molecular insights into evolving vertebrate physiology. Biochem J, 2017. 474(13): p. 2219–2233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sorrentino S, et al. , Degradation of double-stranded RNA by human pancreatic ribonuclease: crucial role of noncatalytic basic amino acid residues. Biochemistry, 2003. 42(34): p. 10182–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Potenza N, et al. , Hybridase activity of human ribonuclease-1 revealed by a real-time fluorometric assay. Nucleic Acids Res, 2006. 34(10): p. 2906–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Landre JB, et al. , Human endothelial cells selectively express large amounts of pancreatic-type ribonuclease (RNase 1). J Cell Biochem, 2002. 86(3): p. 540–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Beintema JJ and Kleineidam RG, The ribonuclease A superfamily: general discussion. Cell Mol Life Sci, 1998. 54(8): p. 825–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schwartz L, et al. , The Immunomodulatory and Antimicrobial Properties of the Vertebrate Ribonuclease A Superfamily. Vaccines (Basel), 2018. 6(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lu L, et al. , Immune Modulation by Human Secreted RNases at the Extracellular Space. Front Immunol, 2018. 9: p. 1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kannemeier C, et al. , Extracellular RNA constitutes a natural procoagulant cofactor in blood coagulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007. 104(15): p. 6388–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fischer S, et al. , Extracellular RNA mediates endothelial-cell permeability via vascular endothelial growth factor. Blood, 2007. 110(7): p. 2457–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fischer S, et al. , Extracellular RNA promotes leukocyte recruitment in the vascular system by mobilising proinflammatory cytokines. Thromb Haemost, 2012. 108(4): p. 730–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cabrera-Fuentes HA, et al. , Regulation of monocyte/macrophage polarisation by extracellular RNA. Thromb Haemost, 2015. 113(3): p. 473–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Noll F, et al. , Self-extracellular RNA acts in synergy with exogenous danger signals to promote inflammation. PLoS One, 2017. 12(12): p. e0190002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fischer S, et al. , Impact of extracellular RNA on endothelial barrier function. Cell Tissue Res, 2014. 355(3): p. 635–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Simsekyilmaz S, et al. , Role of extracellular RNA in atherosclerotic plaque formation in mice. Circulation, 2014. 129(5): p. 598–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cabrera-Fuentes HA, et al. , RNase1 prevents the damaging interplay between extracellular RNA and tumour necrosis factor-alpha in cardiac ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Thromb Haemost, 2014. 112(6): p. 1110–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cabrera-Fuentes HA, et al. , RNase1 as a potential mediator of remote ischaemic preconditioning for cardioprotectiondagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015. 48(5): p. 732–7; discussion 737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ma G, et al. , Ribonuclease attenuates hepatic ischemia reperfusion induced cognitive impairment through the inhibition of inflammatory cytokines in aged mice. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2017. 90: p. 62–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gansler J, Preissner KT, and Fischer S, Influence of proinflammatory stimuli on the expression of vascular ribonuclease 1 in endothelial cells. FASEB J, 2014. 28(2): p. 752–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fischer S, et al. , Extracellular RNA liberates tumor necrosis factor-alpha to promote tumor cell trafficking and progression. Cancer Res, 2013. 73(16): p. 5080–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zimmermann-Geller B, et al. , Influence of Extracellular RNAs, Released by Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts, on Their Adhesive and Invasive Properties. J Immunol, 2016. 197(7): p. 2589–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zakrzewicz D, et al. , Host-derived extracellular RNA promotes adhesion of Streptococcus pneumoniae to endothelial and epithelial cells. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: p. 37758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rosenberg HF, et al. , Rapid evolution of a unique family of primate ribonuclease genes. Nat Genet, 1995. 10(2): p. 219–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rosenberg HF and Dyer KD, Eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin. Evolution of novel function in a primate ribonuclease gene family. J Biol Chem, 1995. 270(50): p. 30234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Barker RL, et al. , Eosinophil cationic protein cDNA. Comparison with other toxic cationic proteins and ribonucleases. J Immunol, 1989. 143(3): p. 952–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Domachowske JB, et al. , Eosinophil cationic protein/RNase 3 is another RNase A-family ribonuclease with direct antiviral activity. Nucleic Acids Res, 1998. 26(14): p. 3358–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Slifman NR, et al. , Ribonuclease activity associated with human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil cationic protein. J Immunol, 1986. 137(9): p. 2913–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sorrentino S and Glitz DG, Ribonuclease activity and substrate preference of human eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). FEBS Lett, 1991. 288(1–2): p. 23–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Acharya KR and Ackerman SJ, Eosinophil granule proteins: form and function. J Biol Chem, 2014. 289(25): p. 17406–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Harder J and Schroder JM, RNase 7, a novel innate immune defense antimicrobial protein of healthy human skin. J Biol Chem, 2002. 277(48): p. 46779–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rosenberg HF, RNase A ribonucleases and host defense: an evolving story. J Leukoc Biol, 2008. 83(5): p. 1079–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yamada KJ, et al. , Eosinophil-associated ribonuclease 11 is a macrophage chemoattractant. J Biol Chem, 2015. 290(14): p. 8863–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rosenberg HF, Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin / RNase 2: connecting the past, the present and the future. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2008. 9(3): p. 135–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hosoki K, et al. , Neutrophil recruitment by allergens contribute to allergic sensitization and allergic inflammation. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 2016. 16(1): p. 45–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lacy P, Mechanisms of degranulation in neutrophils. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 2006. 2(3): p. 98–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Selders GS, et al. , An overview of the role of neutrophils in innate immunity, inflammation and host-biomaterial integration. Regen Biomater, 2017. 4(1): p. 55–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Davis BP and Rothenberg ME, Eosinophils and cancer. Cancer Immunol Res, 2014. 2(1): p. 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sur S, et al. , Localization of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil cationic protein in neutrophilic leukocytes. J Leukoc Biol, 1998. 63(6): p. 715–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rosenberg HF, Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin (EDN/RNase 2) and the Mouse Eosinophil-Associated RNases (mEars): Expanding Roles in Promoting Host Defense. Int J Mol Sci, 2015. 16(7): p. 15442–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yang D, et al. , Human ribonuclease A superfamily members, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and pancreatic ribonuclease, induce dendritic cell maturation and activation. J Immunol, 2004. 173(10): p. 6134–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yang D, et al. , Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin acts as an alarmin to activate the TLR2-MyD88 signal pathway in dendritic cells and enhances Th2 immune responses. J Exp Med, 2008. 205(1): p. 79–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Domachowske JB, et al. , Recombinant human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin/RNase 2 functions as an effective antiviral agent against respiratory syncytial virus. J Infect Dis, 1998. 177(6): p. 1458–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rosenberg HF, Recombinant human eosinophil cationic protein. Ribonuclease activity is not essential for cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem, 1995. 270(14): p. 7876–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Torrent M, et al. , Eosinophil cationic protein high-affinity binding to bacteria-wall lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycans. Biochemistry, 2008. 47(11): p. 3544–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Torrent M, et al. , Comparison of the membrane interaction mechanism of two antimicrobial RNases: RNase 3/ECP and RNase 7. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009. 1788(5): p. 1116–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chiappori A, et al. , Biomarkers and severe asthma: a critical appraisal. Clin Mol Allergy, 2015. 13: p. 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Koh GC, et al. , Eosinophil cationic protein: is it useful in asthma? A systematic review. Respir Med, 2007. 101(4): p. 696–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Shapiro R, et al. , Isolation and characterization of a human colon carcinoma-secreted enzyme with pancreatic ribonuclease-like activity. Biochemistry, 1986. 25(23): p. 7255–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fett JW, et al. , Isolation and characterization of angiogenin, an angiogenic protein from human carcinoma cells. Biochemistry, 1985. 24(20): p. 5480–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sheng J, et al. , Transcription of angiogenin and ribonuclease 4 is regulated by RNA polymerase III elements and a CCCTC binding factor (CTCF)-dependent intragenic chromatin loop. J Biol Chem, 2014. 289(18): p. 12520–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Li S, et al. , Ribonuclease 4 protects neuron degeneration by promoting angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and neuronal survival under stress. Angiogenesis, 2013. 16(2): p. 387–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Strydom DJ, The angiogenins. Cell Mol Life Sci, 1998. 54(8): p. 811–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hofsteenge J, Vicentini A, and Zelenko O, Ribonuclease 4, an evolutionarily highly conserved member of the superfamily. Cell Mol Life Sci, 1998. 54(8): p. 804–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gupta SK, Haigh BJ, and Wheeler TT, Abundance of RNase4 and RNase5 mRNA and protein in host defence related tissues and secretions in cattle. Biochem Biophys Rep, 2016. 8: p. 261–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wong KL, et al. , Gene expression profiling reveals the defining features of the classical, intermediate, and nonclassical human monocyte subsets. Blood, 2011. 118(5): p. e16–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Cocchi F, et al. , Soluble factors from T cells inhibiting X4 strains of HIV are a mixture of beta chemokines and RNases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012. 109(14): p. 5411–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yu W, et al. , Plexin-B2 Mediates Physiologic and Pathologic Functions of Angiogenin. Cell, 2017. 171(4): p. 849–864 e25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gao X and Xu Z, Mechanisms of action of angiogenin. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai), 2008. 40(7): p. 619–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Li S and Hu GF, Emerging role of angiogenin in stress response and cell survival under adverse conditions. J Cell Physiol, 2012. 227(7): p. 2822–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sheng J and Xu Z, Three decades of research on angiogenin: a review and perspective. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai), 2016. 48(5): p. 399–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wang YN, Lee HH, and Hung MC, A novel ligand-receptor relationship between families of ribonucleases and receptor tyrosine kinases. J Biomed Sci, 2018. 25(1): p. 83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Goncalves KA, et al. , Angiogenin Promotes Hematopoietic Regeneration by Dichotomously Regulating Quiescence of Stem and Progenitor Cells. Cell, 2016. 166(4): p. 894–906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kishikawa H, Wu D, and Hu GF, Targeting angiogenin in therapy of amyotropic lateral sclerosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets, 2008. 12(10): p. 1229–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Aparicio-Erriu IM and Prehn JH, Molecular Mechanisms in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: The Role of Angiogenin, a Secreted RNase. Front Neurosci, 2012. 6: p. 167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.van Es MA, et al. , Angiogenin variants in Parkinson disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol, 2011. 70(6): p. 964–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Oikonomou KA, et al. , Angiogenin, angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, and endostatin serum levels in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2011. 17(4): p. 963–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Chiarelli F, et al. , Serum angiogenin concentrations in young patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Invest, 2002. 32(2): p. 110–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Hallahan TW, Shapiro R, and Vallee BL, Dual site model for the organogenic activity of angiogenin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1991. 88(6): p. 2222–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hu GF and Riordan JF, Angiogenin enhances actin acceleration of plasminogen activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1993. 197(2): p. 682–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Hu G, Riordan JF, and Vallee BL, Angiogenin promotes invasiveness of cultured endothelial cells by stimulation of cell-associated proteolytic activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1994. 91(25): p. 12096–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hu GF, Riordan JF, and Vallee BL, A putative angiogenin receptor in angiogenin-responsive human endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1997. 94(6): p. 2204–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bicknell R and Vallee BL, Angiogenin activates endothelial cell phospholipase C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1988. 85(16): p. 5961–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Liu S, et al. , Angiogenin activates Erk1/2 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2001. 287(1): p. 305–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kim HM, et al. , Angiogenin-induced protein kinase B/Akt activation is necessary for angiogenesis but is independent of nuclear translocation of angiogenin in HUVE cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2007. 352(2): p. 509–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Hu GF, Neomycin inhibits angiogenin-induced angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1998. 95(17): p. 9791–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Moroianu J and Riordan JF, Nuclear translocation of angiogenin in proliferating endothelial cells is essential to its angiogenic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1994. 91(5): p. 1677–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Xu ZP, et al. , The nuclear function of angiogenin in endothelial cells is related to rRNA production. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2002. 294(2): p. 287–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tsuji T, et al. , Angiogenin is translocated to the nucleus of HeLa cells and is involved in ribosomal RNA transcription and cell proliferation. Cancer Res, 2005. 65(4): p. 1352–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Moroianu J and Riordan JF, Identification of the nucleolar targeting signal of human angiogenin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1994. 203(3): p. 1765–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lindstrom MS, et al. , Nucleolus as an emerging hub in maintenance of genome stability and cancer pathogenesis. Oncogene, 2018. 37(18): p. 2351–2366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Chen L and Hu GF, Angiogenin-mediated ribosomal RNA transcription as a molecular target for treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol, 2010. 46(9): p. 648–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Ibaragi S, et al. , Angiogenin-stimulated rRNA transcription is essential for initiation and survival of AKT-induced prostate intraepithelial neoplasia. Mol Cancer Res, 2009. 7(3): p. 415–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Li S and Hu GF, Angiogenin-mediated rRNA transcription in cancer and neurodegeneration. Int J Biochem Mol Biol, 2010. 1(1): p. 26–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Xu ZP, et al. , Identification and characterization of an angiogenin-binding DNA sequence that stimulates luciferase reporter gene expression. Biochemistry, 2003. 42(1): p. 121–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Sheng J, et al. , Angiogenin stimulates ribosomal RNA transcription by epigenetic activation of the ribosomal DNA promoter. J Cell Physiol, 2014. 229(4): p. 521–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Shapiro R, Riordan JF, and Vallee BL, Characteristic ribonucleolytic activity of human angiogenin. Biochemistry, 1986. 25(12): p. 3527–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Fu H, et al. , Stress induces tRNA cleavage by angiogenin in mammalian cells. FEBS Lett, 2009. 583(2): p. 437–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Yamasaki S, et al. , Angiogenin cleaves tRNA and promotes stress-induced translational repression. J Cell Biol, 2009. 185(1): p. 35–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Shen Y, et al. , Transfer RNA-derived fragments and tRNA halves: biogenesis, biological functions and their roles in diseases. J Mol Med (Berl), 2018. 96(11): p. 1167–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Zhang X, et al. , Small RNA Modifications: Integral to Function and Disease. Trends Mol Med, 2016. 22(12): p. 1025–1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Ivanov P, et al. , Angiogenin-induced tRNA fragments inhibit translation initiation. Mol Cell, 2011. 43(4): p. 613–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Emara MM, et al. , Angiogenin-induced tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs promote stress-induced stress granule assembly. J Biol Chem, 2010. 285(14): p. 10959–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Wang Q, et al. , Identification and functional characterization of tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs) in respiratory syncytial virus infection. Mol Ther, 2013. 21(2): p. 368–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Anderson P and Ivanov P, tRNA fragments in human health and disease. FEBS Lett, 2014. 588(23): p. 4297–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Honda S, et al. , Sex hormone-dependent tRNA halves enhance cell proliferation in breast and prostate cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015. 112(29): p. E3816–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Saikia M and Hatzoglou M, The Many Virtues of tRNA-derived Stress-induced RNAs (tiRNAs): Discovering Novel Mechanisms of Stress Response and Effect on Human Health. J Biol Chem, 2015. 290(50): p. 29761–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Thompson DM and Parker R, Stressing out over tRNA cleavage. Cell, 2009. 138(2): p. 215–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Diebel KW, et al. , Beyond the Ribosome: Extra-translational Functions of tRNA Fragments. Biomark Insights, 2016. 11(Suppl 1): p. 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Pizzo E, et al. , Ribonuclease/angiogenin inhibitor 1 regulates stress-induced subcellular localization of angiogenin to control growth and survival. J Cell Sci, 2013. 126(Pt 18): p. 4308–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Hoang TT and Raines RT, Molecular basis for the autonomous promotion of cell proliferation by angiogenin. Nucleic Acids Res, 2017. 45(2): p. 818–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Skorupa A, et al. , Motoneurons secrete angiogenin to induce RNA cleavage in astroglia. J Neurosci, 2012. 32(15): p. 5024–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Rosenberg HF and Dyer KD, Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel human ribonuclease (RNase k6): increasing diversity in the enlarging ribonuclease gene family. Nucleic Acids Res, 1996. 24(18): p. 3507–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Prats-Ejarque G, et al. , The first crystal structure of human RNase 6 reveals a novel substrate-binding and cleavage site arrangement. Biochem J, 2016. 473(11): p. 1523–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Prats-Ejarque G, et al. , Characterization of an RNase with two catalytic centers. Human RNase6 catalytic and phosphate-binding site arrangement favors the endonuclease cleavage of polymeric substrates. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj, 2019. 1863(1): p. 105–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Christensen-Quick A, et al. , Human Th17 Cells Lack HIV-Inhibitory RNases and Are Highly Permissive to Productive HIV Infection. J Virol, 2016. 90(17): p. 7833–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Becknell B, et al. , Ribonucleases 6 and 7 have antimicrobial function in the human and murine urinary tract. Kidney Int, 2015. 87(1): p. 151–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Pulido D, et al. , Insights into the Antimicrobial Mechanism of Action of Human RNase6: Structural Determinants for Bacterial Cell Agglutination and Membrane Permeation. Int J Mol Sci, 2016. 17(4): p. 552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Spencer JD, et al. , Ribonuclease 7 is a potent antimicrobial peptide within the human urinary tract. Kidney Int, 2011. 80(2): p. 174–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Amatngalim GD, et al. , Basal cells contribute to innate immunity of the airway epithelium through production of the antimicrobial protein RNase 7. J Immunol, 2015. 194(7): p. 3340–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Zasloff M, Antimicrobial RNases of human skin. J Invest Dermatol, 2009. 129(9): p. 2091–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Simanski M, et al. , Antimicrobial RNases in cutaneous defense. J Innate Immun, 2012. 4(3): p. 241–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Rademacher F, Simanski M, and Harder J, RNase 7 in Cutaneous Defense. Int J Mol Sci, 2016. 17(4): p. 560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Harder J, Schroder JM, and Glaser R, The skin surface as antimicrobial barrier: present concepts and future outlooks. Exp Dermatol, 2013. 22(1): p. 1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Torrent M, et al. , Comparison of human RNase 3 and RNase 7 bactericidal action at the Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial cell wall. FEBS J, 2010. 277(7): p. 1713–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Huang YC, et al. , The flexible and clustered lysine residues of human ribonuclease 7 are critical for membrane permeability and antimicrobial activity. J Biol Chem, 2007. 282(7): p. 4626–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Lin YM, et al. , Outer membrane protein I of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a target of cationic antimicrobial peptide/protein. J Biol Chem, 2010. 285(12): p. 8985–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Chang TW, et al. , Outer membrane lipoprotein Lpp is Gram-negative bacterial cell surface receptor for cationic antimicrobial peptides. J Biol Chem, 2012. 287(1): p. 418–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Gambichler T, et al. , Differential mRNA expression of antimicrobial peptides and proteins in atopic dermatitis as compared to psoriasis vulgaris and healthy skin. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2008. 147(1): p. 17–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Harder J, et al. , Enhanced expression and secretion of antimicrobial peptides in atopic dermatitis and after superficial skin injury. J Invest Dermatol, 2010. 130(5): p. 1355–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Kopfnagel V, et al. , RNase 7 downregulates TH2 cytokine production by activated human T cells. Allergy, 2017. 72(11): p. 1694–1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Rudolph B, et al. , Identification of RNase 8 as a novel human antimicrobial protein. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2006. 50(9): p. 3194–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Chan CC, et al. , Genetic diversity of human RNase 8. BMC Genomics, 2012. 13: p. 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Devor EJ, Moffat-Wilson KA, and Galbraith JJ, LOC 390443 (RNase 9) on chromosome 14q11.2 is related to the RNase A superfamily and contains a unique aminoterminal preproteinlike sequence. Hum Biol, 2004. 76(6): p. 921–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Cheng GZ, et al. , Human ribonuclease 9, a member of ribonuclease A superfamily, specifically expressed in epididymis, is a novel sperm-binding protein. Asian J Androl, 2009. 11(2): p. 240–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Zhu CF, et al. , RNase9, an androgen-dependent member of the RNase A family, is specifically expressed in the rat epididymis. Biol Reprod, 2007. 76(1): p. 63–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Liu J, et al. , Cloning, expression and location of RNase9 in human epididymis. BMC Res Notes, 2008. 1: p. 111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Penttinen J, et al. , Discovery in silico and characterization in vitro of novel genes exclusively expressed in the mouse epididymis. Mol Endocrinol, 2003. 17(11): p. 2138–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Westmuckett AD, et al. , Impaired sperm maturation in RNASE9 knockout mice. Biol Reprod, 2014. 90(6): p. 120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Anfossi S, et al. , Clinical utility of circulating non-coding RNAs - an update. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2018. 15(9): p. 541–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Ardito CM, et al. , EGF receptor is required for KRAS-induced pancreatic tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell, 2012. 22(3): p. 304–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Navas C, et al. , EGF receptor signaling is essential for k-ras oncogene-driven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell, 2012. 22(3): p. 318–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Oliveira-Cunha M, Newman WG, and Siriwardena AK, Epidermal growth factor receptor in pancreatic cancer. Cancers (Basel), 2011. 3(2): p. 1513–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Sandgren EP, et al. , Overexpression of TGF alpha in transgenic mice: induction of epithelial hyperplasia, pancreatic metaplasia, and carcinoma of the breast. Cell, 1990. 61(6): p. 1121–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Tobita K, et al. , Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in human pancreatic cancer: Significance for liver metastasis. Int J Mol Med, 2003. 11(3): p. 305–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Fjallskog ML, et al. , Expression of molecular targets for tyrosine kinase receptor antagonists in malignant endocrine pancreatic tumors. Clin Cancer Res, 2003. 9(4): p. 1469–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Means AL, et al. , Overexpression of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor in mouse pancreas results in fibrosis and epithelial metaplasia. Gastroenterology, 2003. 124(4): p. 1020–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Huang PH, Xu AM, and White FM, Oncogenic EGFR signaling networks in glioma. Sci Signal, 2009. 2(87): p. re6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Tomas A, Futter CE, and Eden ER, EGF receptor trafficking: consequences for signaling and cancer. Trends Cell Biol, 2014. 24(1): p. 26–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Moore MJ, et al. , Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol, 2007. 25(15): p. 1960–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Philip PA, et al. , Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol, 2010. 28(22): p. 3605–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Troiani T, et al. , Targeting EGFR in pancreatic cancer treatment. Curr Drug Targets, 2012. 13(6): p. 802–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Wormann SM and Algul H, Risk factors and therapeutic targets in pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol, 2013. 3: p. 282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Nedaeinia R, et al. , EGFR as a potential target for the treatment of pancreatic cancer: dilemma and controversies. Curr Drug Targets, 2014. 15(14): p. 1293–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Shimoyama S, et al. , Increased angiogenin expression in pancreatic cancer is related to cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Res, 1996. 56(12): p. 2703–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Ying H, et al. , Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell, 2012. 149(3): p. 656–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Wang SC and Hung MC, Nuclear translocation of the epidermal growth factor receptor family membrane tyrosine kinase receptors. Clin Cancer Res, 2009. 15(21): p. 6484–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Wang YN, Hsu JL, and Hung MC, Nuclear functions and trafficking of receptor tyrosine kinases, in Vesicle trafficking in cancer, Yarden Y and Tarcic G, Editors. 2013, Springer: New York: p. 159–176. [Google Scholar]
- 176.Lee HH, Wang YN, and Hung MC, Non-canonical signaling mode of the epidermal growth factor receptor family. Am J Cancer Res, 2015. 5(10): p. 2944–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Han W and Lo HW, Landscape of EGFR signaling network in human cancers: biology and therapeutic response in relation to receptor subcellular locations. Cancer Lett, 2012. 318(2): p. 124–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Brand TM, et al. , Nuclear EGFR as a molecular target in cancer. Radiother Oncol, 2013. 108(3): p. 370–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Research Misconduct Found]
- 179.Chou RH, et al. , EGFR modulates DNA synthesis and repair through Tyr phosphorylation of histone H4. Dev Cell, 2014. 30(2): p. 224–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Li LY, et al. , Nuclear ErbB2 enhances translation and cell growth by activating transcription of ribosomal RNA genes. Cancer Res, 2011. 71(12): p. 4269–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]