Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Nanomedicine logoLink to International Journal of Nanomedicine
. 2019 Oct 9;14:8105–8119. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S214236

Surface-Engineered Super-Paramagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles For Chromium Removal

Antony V Samrot 1,✉, Chamarthy Sai Sahithya 2, Jenifer Selvarani A 2, Senthilkumar Pachiyappan 3, Suresh Kumar S 4,5,✉
PMCID: PMC6790408  PMID: 31632021

Abstract

Background

Super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are widely used metal nanoparticles for various applications for its magnetic property and biocompatibility. In recent years, pollution of our environment especially with heavy metals in waterbodies has become a major threat and has left us very minimal sources of freshwater to drink. SPIONs or surface modified SPIONs can be used to remove these heavy metals

Methods

SPIONs were synthesized by co-precipitation method and further coated with a biopolymer, chitosan. Chromium solution was treated with the synthesized SPIONs to study the efficiency of chromium removal by surface adsorption. Later, the adsorption was analysed by direct and indirect analysis methods using UV-VIS spectrophotometry and isotherm studies.

Results

Stable chitosan-coated SPIONs were synthesized and they adsorbed chromium better than the uncoated SPIONs, where it was adsorbing up to 100 ppm. Adsorption was found to be increasing with decrease in pH.

Conclusion

The surface-modified SPIONs expressed cumulative adsorption action. Even after the adsorption studies, chitosan-coated SPIONs were possessing magnetic property. Thus, the surface-modified SPIONs can become an ideal nanotechnology tool to remove the chromium from groundwater.

Keywords: SPIONs, chitosan coating, chromium, adsorption, isotherm studies

Introduction

The industrialization and exploitation of earth have led to an increase in pollution of resources at an alarming rate. One of the most concerned areas of these effects is water. Water pollution is increasing day by day due to contamination of heavy metal ions, toxins, dyes, waste, etc. The main reason for this pollution is due to the release of unprocessed and untreated effluents of tanneries, electronic industries, etc. Among the causes, heavy metal contamination is very dangerous and poses an unfaltering risk to all the living communities. The elements which have a specific density more than 5 g/cm3 can be generally termed as heavy metals. A lot of these heavy metal ions are present in the environment naturally and also in human bodies as micronutrients, but heavy metals such as mercury, lead, chromium, arsenic are extremely toxic and hazardous to the environment when accumulated. It leads to biomagnification which results in the accumulation of heavy metals in body organs, thus leading to organ failure, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.1,2 Chromium (Cr) is a heavy metal with an atomic number 24 and atomic weight 51.996, which is present in different oxidation states such as chromium, trivalent chromium (Cr3+) and hexavalent chromium (Cr6+). Among them, hexavalent chromium is said to be highly toxic since it can pass through cell wall causing noxious influence inside cells and also causes cancers. Hexavalent chromium is a common pollutant seen in natural waters due to the industrial wastewater effluent, especially, tanning and leather industries. Generally, the maximum allowed limit of chromium in groundwater is 0.05 ppm.3 Short-term exposure of chromium levels above the maximum contaminant level causes skin and stomach irritation.4,5 Long-term exposure can cause dermatitis, damage to liver, nerve tissue damage, and also death.6,7 Hence, removing these hazardous pollutants is being prioritized and researched to possibly reduce pollution. Nanotechnology can pave the way for removing these pollutants from water.

Nanotechnology can be defined as a branch of science that deals with particles that fall in the size range of 1–100 nm.8 Nanotechnology and the study of nanosized objects require knowledge on diverse fields of science such as surface chemistry,9 molecular engineering, semiconductor physics, biology, and photoreduction of heavy metals10–14 etc. and are a convergence of such different traditional sciences.15 Their small size and better properties such as surface to volume ratio, surface interaction and surface energy when compared to their bulk material are one of the reasons why nanotechnology has been one of the rapidly growing fields of science.16

Iron oxide nanoparticles have attracted a lot of interest in the scientific and research community due to its unique properties such as small size, superparamagnetic nature, surface charge, full spin polarization, and high curie temperature.17 Individual SPIONs have a large magnetic moment within them and thus enabling those to behave as giant paramagnetic atom and respond to the applied magnetic field and lose their magnetism once the external magnetic field is removed.18 Super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) include magnetite (Fe3O4), maghemite (ɣ-Fe2O3), hematite (α-Fe2O3), and other ferrites.19 These features and properties of iron oxide nanoparticles have enabled them to be utilized in a lot of applications such as targeted drug delivery,20 hyperthermia,21,22 imaging,23,24 tissue engineering,25 stem cell labelling,26 in-vitro-bio-separation, and heavy metal removal.27 Although used in diverse ways, the major challenge faced when working with SPIONs is to make them monodispersed which is possible by surface engineering or surface modification by a functionalizing agent or a potent biopolymer.

One of the best biopolymers to coat onto SPIONs to increase the stability as well as the adsorption efficiency for a cumulative effect is chitosan. Chitosan has widely been studied as a pollutant adsorption from aqueous solutions due to its cationic character. The presence of reactive functional groups such as amino and hydroxyl groups in polymer chains of chitosan act as the active sites for adsorption in addition to its low cost and local availability, high reactivity, excellent chelation behaviour, and high selectivity towards chromium heavy metals.28–30

The rate and nature of adsorption are usually analysed and studied using adsorption isotherms. It explains the amount of adsorbate adsorbed on the adsorbent as a function of its pressure (if gas) or concentration (for liquid phase solutes) at constant temperature. The basic adsorption isotherms used to study the adsorption process are Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, and Temkin isotherm. In this study, SPIONs were coated with chitosan and used as adsorbate to remove chromium from water and subjected for isotherm studies.

Materials And Methods

Materials

The materials used in this study are all of analytical grade. The chemicals used are ferric chloride ( Loba Chemie), ferrous chloride (Loba Chemie, sodium hydroxide (SRL), ammonium solution (SRL), hydrochloric acid, chitosan (SRL), acetic acid (RANKEM), ethanol, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, diphenyl carbazide, potassium dichromate, and methanol. The whole study was done using nitrogen purged MilliQ water.

Methods

Synthesis Of Super-Paramagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs)

All the chemicals used for SPIONs production were prepared in nitrogen purged MilliQ water. SPIONs were synthesized using 1M of FeCl3 and 3M of FeCl2 which were prepared separately. Equal volumes (25 mL) of the above precursors were brought into a mixture and stirred well. While heating the prepared precursor iron mixture at 60 °C, 50 mL of 8M NaOH was added in drops on constant vigorous stirring with simultaneous dropwise addition of ammonia solution until a black precipitate is formed. The alkali pH of the precipitate solution was brought down to neutral by adding 1N HCl. Thus, formed black particles were allowed to settle and separate out from the mixture by applying a magnetic field. The collected particles were washed repeatedly using nitrogen purged MilliQ water until neutral pH and then freeze-dried to remove moisture.

Preparation Of Chitosan-Coated SPIONs (Cs-SPIONs)

1 g of chitosan biopolymer was dissolved in 100 mL of 1 % acetic acid solution and stirred for 5 h in a magnetic stirrer until a homogenous mixture was obtained. Then, 800 mg of finely powdered SPIONs was added to the above chitosan solution and kept for shaking in a rotary shaker for 18 h. This step is followed by ultrasonication for 30 min and centrifugation. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed to remove excess biopolymer solution. The resultant washed pellet was then lyophilized to obtain powder chitosan-coated SPIONs (Cs-SPIONs). The coated SPIONs were then utilized for further analysis and subjected to adsorption studies.

Characterization Of SPIONs And Cs-SPIONs

The SPIONs and chitosan-coated SPIONs (Cs-SPIONs) were characterized using UV-visible spectroscopy (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Japan), FT-IR spectroscopy (IR affinity-1S, Shimadzu), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Carl Zeiss, Germany), energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), AFM microscopy (Bruker, Dimension icon model, Germany), XRD (Rigaku, Tokyo), zeta potential analysis (Brookhaven ZetaPALS, New York), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) with a maximum Magnetic field of 2.5 T and dynamic moment range of 1 × 10 e−6 emu–10 e3 emu (Lakeshore, USA, Model 7407).

Adsorption Studies

Adsorption study was performed to study the extent of removal of hexavalent chromium by SPIONs and chitosan-coated SPIONs (Cs-SPIONs).

Adsorbate Preparation

For the study, different concentrations of chromium in parts per million (ppm) were prepared using potassium dichromate as the chromium salt. 0.14 g of potassium dichromate (K2Cr207) in 100 mL of MilliQ water corresponds to 500 ppm, and further dilution was done to obtain 100 ppm, 50 ppm, and 1 ppm of chromium solution. The prepared different concentrations of chromium solutions were tested against different dosages of adsorbents on different time intervals and pH in order to fix the optimal conditions.

Chromium Detection Techniques

Two different methods were followed to detect the chromium in the treated supernatants by direct method and indirect or DPC method.

Direct Method

Direct method is based on the UV-Vis absorbance maxima of chromium at 370 nm, usually performed for high concentration of chromium (above 1 ppm). In this method, the chromium in the treated supernatant was directly quantified by measuring their absorbance at 370 nm.

Diphenyl carbazide (DPC) method or Indirect Method

Chromium concentration less than 1 ppm can be detected using DPC method. Here, 1 mL of the treated supernatant was added with 30 µL of 2 N H2SO4 to initiate Cr6+ dissociation followed by addition of 20 µL of DPC (250 mg of DPC in 50 mL methanol/carbinol) to bind with Cr6+. The interaction with DPC produced reddish-violet colour, which was spectrophotometrically analyzed at 540 nm.31,32

Adsorbent Optimization

Different concentrations of each adsorbent, i.e., SPIONs and Cs-SPIONs, were taken in a range of 0.5 g/L to 7 g/L separately in order to determine the concentration which serves as a better adsorbent. These concentrations were added to different flasks containing 100 mL of 1 ppm chromium solution. They were left in the shaker to interact for 2 h and later indirect method of chromium determination was performed. The obtained OD values were taken in order to calculate the final concentration of chromium (using standard graph) and the percentage removal. A graph was plotted with concentration of adsorbent on X-axis and % removal on Y-axis.

graphic file with name M1.gif

Adsorbent–Adsorbate Concentration Optimization

In this stage, the best adsorbent (Cs-SPIONs) was used and evaluated for the optimal dosage of adsorbent concentration for chromium removal. Along with the adsorbent, chromium concentration was also optimized. Different concentrations of Cs-SPION 1g/L to 10 g/L were taken as a set. Each set of Cs-SPIONs was added to different flasks containing varied chromium concentrations like 1 ppm, 50 ppm, 100 ppm, and 500 ppm. It was then left for interaction for 2 h under constant rotation, and later, the supernatant was analysed for chromium concentration. From the OD values, the final concentration of chromium (using standard graph) and the percentage removal was calculated, and a graph was plotted with the concentration of adsorbent on X-axis and % removal on Y-axis.

Optimization Of Time Interval

In order to optimize the time required for the complete adsorption of chromium ions by Cs-SPIONs, the required dosages of Cs-SPIONs were taken and added to 50 ppm chromium concentration. The solution was stirred constantly and the supernatant from centrifugation was taken at 15 min interval for 2 h. The supernatant was analysed by the direct method. From the OD values, the final concentration of chromium (using standard graph) and the percentage removal were calculated and a graph was plotted with time interval on X-axis and % removal on Y-axis.

pH Optimization

pH optimization was done to know the adsorption at different pH and to understand if acidic pH favours adsorption more. In this experiment, different pH ranging from 1 to 6 was maintained in different flasks containing 100 mL of 50 ppm chromium solution. The pH was set using 0.5 M NaOH and 4 N HNO3. Three sets of the above-mentioned pH ranges were taken. To each of these sets, Cs-SPIONs of 1 g/L, 5 g/L, and 10 g/L concentrations were added and allowed to interact for 2 h. Later, the supernatant was collected at the end of incubation and analyzed using the direct method. From the OD values, the final concentration of chromium (using standard graph) and the percentage removal were calculated, and a graph was plotted with pH on X-axis and % removal on Y–axis.

Adsorption Isotherm

After optimization of all the parameters such as adsorbent–adsorbate concentrations, time, and pH, the data were used to plot isotherms for the study. Three isotherms, namely, Langmuir (1/qe vs 1/Ce), Freundlich (ln Qe vs ln Ce), and Temkin (qe vs ln Ce) isotherms, were plotted by calculating the Ce, Qe, 1/Ce, ln Ce, 1/Qe, and ln Qe values.

Qe = (Ci-Ce) V/m; Ci = initial concentration; Ce = final concentration; V = volume; m = mass.

Adsorbent Characterization

After the adsorption studies were done, the pellet of adsorbed Cs-SPIONs obtained by centrifugation was dried. This adsorbent sample was subjected for analysing its magnetic properties after adsorption studies by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) (Lakeshore, USA, Model 7407).

Results And Discussions

Characterization Of SPIONs And Cs-SPIONs

UV-Visible Spectroscopy (UV-VIS)

UV-Vis spectroscopy showed the highest peak from 260 nm (Figure 1A) which confirmed the presence of iron oxide nanoparticles.18 Chitosan-coated SPIONs (Cs-SPIONs) were analysed for the presence of chitosan biopolymer and iron oxide nanoparticles. The peaks formed at 392 nm and 260 nm (Figure 1B) confirmed the presence of chitosan and iron oxides, respectively.33

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

UV - Vis analysis (A) SPIONs, (B) Cs-SPIONs.

Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

FTIR analysis of SPIONs showed bands at 3418.75 cm−1 and 1596.19 cm−1 (Figure 2A) which corresponded to the stretching (ν) and bending (δ) vibrations, respectively. This was due to adsorbed water on the surface of the iron oxide nanoparticles. The band observed at 584.65 cm−1 corresponded to the stretching vibrations of Fe(tetrahedral)–O–Fe(octahedral). Thus, from the spectrum, it can be concluded the sample is iron oxide nanoparticles.34 The FTIR results of Cs-SPIONs (Figure 2B) confirmed the biopolymer coating onto the SPIONs with peaks at 2818.07 cm−1, 1600.06 cm−1, 1483.35 cm−1, and 1078.62 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching vibrations of –CH, N–H, C–N vibration of amino group and C–O in the ether group of chitosan, respectively.33

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

FT-IR analysis (A) SPIONs, (B) Cs-SPIONs.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The surface morphology and size of the nanoparticles were found out using scanning electron microscope. The images obtained from SEM analysis showed that the average particle size of synthesized SPIONs was ranging around 9–25 nm (Figure 3A), with the smallest particles having the size of around 9 –10 nm and the largest particles having a size around 22 –25 nm.34 SEM imaging also revealed the surface morphology and size of the SPIONs after coating with chitosan (Cs-SPIONs) having an average particle size ranging around 30–40 nm (Figure 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

SEM vis analysis (A) SPIONs, (B) Cs-SPIONs.

Energy-Dispersive X-Ray (EDAX)

In this analysis, the synthesized SPIONs were detected with the elements Fe and O (Figure 4A), thus confirming the presence of iron oxides. EDAX analysis of Cs-SPIONs showed the presence of the major elements such as C, O, and Fe which was the representation of iron oxides and chitosan biopolymer (Figure 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

EDX analysis (A) SPIONs, (B) Cs-SPIONs.

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

The three-dimensional structure of the SPIONs was seen using atomic force microscope. Here, the particles were found to be around 20 nm with cubical shape (Figure 5A). Chitosan-coated nanoparticles were found to be around 28–41 nm with cubical shape (Figure 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

AFM analysis (A) SPIONs, (B) Cs-SPIONs.

X-Ray Diffraction Spectroscopy (XRD)

XRD pattern showed that the particles were highly crystalline with high intensity peaks at 32.01° (220), 35.67° (311), 43.17° (400), 54.03° (422), 56.79° (511), and 62.76° (440) (Figure 6A) which were in accordance with the values of Fe3O4 XRD graph of JCPDS data number 87–2334.35 Hence, the particles were confirmed to be magnetite nanoparticles. XRD analysis of Cs-SPIONs showed the particles to be highly crystalline in nature with sharp peaks at 10.44°, which is a characteristic peak for chitosan (Figure 6B). The rest of the peaks were in par with the peaks of Fe3O4 with high-intensity peaks at (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440).36

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

XRD analysis (A) SPIONs, (B) Cs-SPIONs.

Zeta Potential Analysis

SPIONs were seen to have a charge of −13.43 mV (Figure 7A). Any value above +25mV and below −25mV is said to be stable in nature.37 SPIONs were found to be unstable and needed surface functionalization or engineering to make them stable and less aggregated that would be favourable for further studies. Cs-SPIONs were seen to have a charge of −25.51 mV (Figure 7B) and found to be stable.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Zeta potential analysis (A) SPIONs (B) Cs-SPIONs.

Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM)

The M-H hysteresis curve of the SPIONs showed to have a slight hysteresis curve with magnetization around 84.901 emu/g (Figure 8A and B). Both SPIONs and Cs-SPIONs were found to be super-paramagnetic in nature with slightly ferromagnetic features.38

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

VSM analysis (A) SPIONs, (B) Cs-SPIONs.

Adsorption Studies

Adsorbent Optimization

This experiment was performed in order to determine the best adsorbent between SPIONs and Cs-SPIONs. Different dosages of these adsorbents were taken and checked for the removal of 1 ppm Cr6+ heavy metal ions from the solution. It was seen that at 7 g/L dosage of adsorbent, 80.44% and 99.7% removal was attained by SPIONs and Cs-SPIONs, respectively (Figure 9). Hence, this proved that Cs-SPIONs were better adsorbents than naked SPIONs, and so Cs-SPIONs were utilized for further studies. Chitosan is a cationic polysaccharide molecule whose amine group may be involved in coating against the synthesised negatively charged SPIONs, whereas for the chromium adsorption, it is predicted that the redox reaction in hydroxyl group of chitosan as well as the negative charge of SPIONs can support for an ionic interaction towards chromium ions (Cr+). When bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)-dithiophosphinic acid (Cyanex-301)-coated SPIONs were checked for chromium removal, it was proposed that the complexation between the thiol group on Cyanex-301 and Cr (VI) ions promoted the chromium adsorption.39 Polymer-coated iron oxide (polyMETAC-2(methacryloyloxy)ethyl trimethyl-ammonium chloride) were produced by Hanif and Shahzad40 to treat contaminated water containing chromium ions Cr(VI) and dye (alizarin). This polycationic polymer-based iron oxides have also resulted in removal by 80–96% of dye and 62–91% of chromium Cr(VI). To be more analogous with the above-reported results with Cs-SPIONs, the chitosan–magnetite nanocomposite strip was developed by Sureshkumar et al41 where they showed similar adsorption efficiency. These strips were checked for chromium adsorption, where chitosan–magnetite nanocomposite strips exhibited better chromium ion removal (92.33%) when compared with chitosan strips (29.39%). Thus, it is very obvious that iron oxide nanoparticles can be used as a potent water remediation tool via different surface fabrication.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Adsorbent optimization for chromium removal.

Adsorbent–Adsorbate Concentration Optimization

Optimization of the concentrations of adsorbent (Cs-SPIONs) and adsorbate (hexavalent chromium) was done by taking various concentrations of nanoparticles and chromium solutions. The extend of proficiency of adsorption in each set was recorded and analysed. Through this study, it was found that the highest concentration of Cs-SPIONs, i.e., 10 g/L, was observed to have the highest adsorption efficiency in all the chromium concentrations except 500 ppm. The maximum removal of 98.2% by 10 g/L was seen in 50 ppm of chromium solution (Figure 10). Hence, the concentrations were optimized to be 10 g/L for Cs-SPIONs and 50 ppm for chromium ions. Having a similar study design of optimization, the removal of nickel heavy metal ions from industrial effluents was examined in a bioreactor using chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles as the adsorbent.42 The optimal conditions for efficient nickel ion removal were reached at retention time (20–60 mins) with the adsorbent concentration at 0.09–1 g/L and pH level (0.5–9). Maximum removal rates to 83% and 92.1% were accomplished for nickel heavy metal ions from synthetic and industrial effluents using chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticle.42

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Optimization of adsorbent–adsorbate concentration.

Optimization Of Time Interval

In order to determine the optimum time period where maximum efficiency is reached, different dosages of Cs-SPIONs were taken in 50 ppm chromium solution and checked for % removal at every 15 min for 2 h. Maximum removal was seen at 105th min for 3 g/L, 5 g/L, and 10 g/L and at 120th min for 7 g/L and 9 g/L (Figure 11).

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

Optimization of time period for chromium removal.

pH Optimization

pH optimization was done to check the effect of pH in the adsorption rate. Hence, different concentrations of Cs-SPIONs in 50 ppm chromium solution were taken to understand the difference in % removal with respect to pH change. The change in the removal at two different time intervals was also checked to understand the pH effect in a better way. It was seen that as the pH decreases, the removal efficiency has steadily increased and the maximum efficiency was seen at pH 2 (Figure 12). The % removal was also greater at 60th and 120th min at pH 2 when compared to other pH ranges. This showed that removal efficiency and adsorption were greatly influenced by pH and must be because of hexavalent Cr ion conversion into trivalent which are relatively easier to be removed. More comparable pH effect for chromium removal was conveyed by Bhaumik et al43 using Fe3O4-coated polypyrrole magnetic composite where 100% adsorption of Cr(VI) was attained at pH 2. The adsorption efficiency was greater at lower pH and concluded that ionic exchange or reduction at the adsorbent could possibly be the driving force for Cr(VI) removal. The better response of Cs-SPIONs against chromium removal at low pH can be understood by analysing the facts of surface chemistry at the aqueous phase. Metal oxides are generally covered by hydroxyl group, which tends to vary in its form at different pH. For iron oxides, the surface charge becomes neutral at pH 5.8, further lowering the pH will render the adsorbent surface rich of hydronium ions which acts as positively charged surface. Also that Cr(VI) species predominantly exits as monovalent bichromate (HCrO4−) and divalent dichromate (Cr2O72-) at lower pH. This creates electrostatic attraction between the hydronium ions and chromium ions resulting in better adsorption. However, chromium ions also compete for the protons at the lower pH.44,45

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Open in a new tab

Optimization of pH for chromium removal.

Adsorption Isotherm

With the given data of adsorption, three different adsorption isotherms are plotted, namely, Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, and Temkin isotherm. From the isotherm data (Figure 13), it is observed that the R2 value of Freundlich isotherm is 0.928 which implies that the given adsorbent and the nature of adsorption happening are in relevance with Freundlich isotherm. From this, it can be stated that the nature of adsorption is multilayered and homogenous with non-uniform distribution. Similar experimentation was performed by Samrot et al33 using chitosan-coated SPIONs and subjected to chromium removal studies. These chitosan-coated SPIONs were found to show 80% of chromium removal efficiency and the adsorption mechanism was the same as that of the above-reported isotherm, i.e., Freundlich isotherm whose adsorption efficacy was dependent on the concentration of adsorbent and adsorbate used. Jiang et al46 produced magnetically separable millimeter-sized chitosan beads containing nanosized γ-Fe2O3 and used these beads for chromium removal. The adsorption pattern of chromium ions onto γ-Fe2O3-loaded chitosan beads was corresponding to Freundlich isotherm as well.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Open in a new tab

Isotherm studies for chromium removal.

Adsorbent Characterization

VSM analysis of Cs-SPIONs after adsorption (Figure 14) also showed that the magnetization has not changed throughout the adsorption process. The particles were seen to be superparamagnetic with slight ferromagnetic qualities.38

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Open in a new tab

Vibrating sample magnetometer of Cs-SPIONs after adsorption.

Conclusion

From this study, it can be concluded that chitosan-coated SPIONs (Cs-SPIONs) can have a cumulative effect in removing heavy metals such as hexavalent chromium efficiently. It was also found that the removal efficiency is maximum at acidic pH, i.e., at a pH of 2, and 10 g/L adsorbents can efficiently remove up to 50 ppm of hexavalent chromium ions. From this study, it can be said that Cs-SPIONs can be efficiently used in treating and removing chromium heavy metal ions from groundwaters in a proper controlled treatment system.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp Suppl. 2012;101:133–164. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Järup L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull. 2003;68:167–182. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Owlad M, Aroua MK, Daud WAW, Baroutian S. Removal of hexavalent chromium-contaminated water and wastewater: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009;200(1):59–77. doi: 10.1007/s11270-008-9893-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barnowski C, Jakubowski N, Stuewer D, Broekaert JAC. Speciation of chromium by direct coupling of ion exchange chromatography with ICP-MS. At Spectrom. 1997;1155(10):1155–1161. doi: 10.1039/a702120h [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gil RA, Cerutti S, Gásquez JA, Olsina RA, Martinez LD. Preconcentration and speciation of chromium in drinking water samples by coupling of on-line sorption on activated carbon to ETAAS determination. Talanta. 2006;68(4):1065–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.06.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Katz SA, Slem H. The Biological and Environmental Chemistry of Chromium. New York: VCH; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kotas J, Stasicka Z. Chromium occurrence in the environment and methods of its speciation. Environ Pollut. 2000;107(3):263–283. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00168-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mohanraj VJ, Chen Y. Nanoparticles-a review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2006;5(1):561–573. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Erbil HY. Surface Chemistry of Solid and Liquid Interfaces. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu JH, Shao FQ, Han SY, et al. Shape-controlled synthesis of well-dispersed platinum nanocubes supported on graphitic carbon nitride as advanced visible-light-driven catalyst for efficient photoreduction of hexavalent chromium. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;1(535):41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shao FQ, Feng JJ, Lin XX, Jiang LY, Wang AJ. Simple fabrication of AuPd@Pd core-shell nanocrystals for effective catalytic reduction of hexavalent chromium. Appl Catalysis B. 2017;208:128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu JH, Shao FQ, Luo XQ, Xu HJ, Wang AJ. Pd nanocones supported on g-C3N4: an efficient photocatalyst for boosting catalytic reduction of hexavalent chromium under visible-light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;471:935–942. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.075 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li DN, Shao FQ, Feng JJ, Wei J, Zhang QL, Wang AJ. Uniform Pt@Pd nanocrystals supported on N-doped reduced graphene oxide as catalysts for effective reduction of highly toxic chromium(VI). Mater Chem Phys. 2018;205:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.10.074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hu LY, Chen LX, Liu MT, Wang AJ, Wu LJ, Feng JJ. Theophylline-assisted, eco-friendly synthesis of PtAu nanospheres at reduced graphene oxide with enhanced catalytic activity towards Cr(VI) reduction. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;493:94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.12.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saini R, Saini S, Sharma S. Nanotechnology: the future medicine. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010;3(1):32–33. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.63301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian J Chem. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goya GF, Berquo TS, Fonseca FC, Morales MP. Static and dynamic magnetic properties of spherical magnetite nanoparticles. J Appl Phys. 2003;94(5):3520–3528. doi: 10.1063/1.1599959 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Justin C, Philip SA, Samrot AV. Synthesis and characterization of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) and utilization of SPIONs in X-ray imaging. Appl Nanosci. 2017;7(7):463–475. doi: 10.1007/s13204-017-0583-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2005;26(18):3995–4021. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shubayev VI, Pisanic TR II, Jin S. Magnetic nanoparticles for theragnostics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(6):467–477. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sethi M, Chakarvarti SK. Hyperthermia Techniques for cancer treatment: a Review. Int J Pharmtech Res. 2015;8(6):292–299. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kalber TL, Ordidge KL, Southern P, et al. Hyperthermia treatment of tumors by mesenchymal stem cell-delivered superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:1973–1983. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S94255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee H, Yu MK, Park S, et al. Thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and application as a dual imaging probe for cancer in vivo. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(42):12739–12745. doi: 10.1021/ja072210i [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Justin C, Samrot AV, Sahithya CS, Bhavya KS, Saipriya C. Preparation, characterization and utilization of coreshell super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for curcumin delivery. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Heidari F, Bahrololoom ME, Vashaee D, Tayebi L. In situ preparation of iron oxide nanoparticles in natural hydroxyapatite/chitosan matrix for bone tissue engineering application. Ceramics Int. 2015;41(2):3094–3100. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.153 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Babic M, Horák D, Trchová M, et al. Poly (L-lysine)-modified iron oxide nanoparticles for stem cell labelling. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19(3):740–750. doi: 10.1021/bc700410z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Samrot AV, Senthilkumar P, Rashmitha S, Veera P, Sahithya CS. Azadirachta indica influenced biosynthesis of super-paramagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles and their applications in tannery water treatment and X-ray imaging. J Nanostructure Chem. 2018;8(3):343–351. doi: 10.1007/s40097-018-0279-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.No HK, Meyers SP. Application of chitosan for treatment of wastewaters. Rev Environ Contam Toxico. 2000;163:1–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guibal E. Interactions of metal ions with chitosan-based sorbents: a review. Sep Purif Technol. 2004;38(1):43–74. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rojas G, Silva J, Flores JA, Rodriguez A, Ly M, Maldonado H. Adsorption of chromium onto cross-linked chitosan. Sep Purif Technol. 2005;44(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2004.11.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stover NM. Diphenylcarbazide as a test for chromium. J Am Chem Soc. 1928;50(9):2363–2366. doi: 10.1021/ja01396a007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shigematsu T, Gohda S, Yamazaki H, Nishikawa Y. Spectrophotometric determination of Chromium (III) and Chromium (VI) in sea water. Bull Inst Chem Res. 1978;55(5):429–440. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Samrot AV, Shobana N, Sruthi PD, Sahithya CS. Utilization of chitosan-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for chromium removal. Appl Water Sci. 2018;8(7):192. doi: 10.1007/s13201-018-0841-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kayal S, Ramanujan RV. Doxorubicin loaded PVA coated iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2010;30(3):484–490. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.01.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Balasubramanian C, Joseph B, Gupta P, et al. X-ray absorption spectroscopy characterization of iron-oxide nanoparticles synthesized by high temperature plasma processing. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2014;196:125–129. doi: 10.1016/j.elspec.2014.02.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kumar S, Koh J. Physiochemical, optical and biological activity of chitosan-chromone derivative for biomedical applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(5):6102–6116. doi: 10.3390/ijms13056102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Greenwood R, Kendall K. Selection of suitable dispersants for aqueous suspensions of zirconia and titania powders using acoustophoresis. J Eur Ceram Soc. 1999;19(4):479–488. doi: 10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00208-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mahmoudi M, Simchi A, Imani M, et al. A new approach for the in vitro identification of the cytotoxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2010;75(1):300–309. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Burks T, Uheida A, Saleemi M, Eita M, Toprak MS, Muhammed M. Removal of Chromium (VI) using surface modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Sep Sci Technol. 2013;48(8):1243–1251. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2012.734364 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hanif S, Shahzad A. Removal of chromium(VI) and dye Alizarin Red S (ARS) using polymer-coated iron oxide (Fe3O4) magn.etic nanoparticles by co-precipitation method. J Nanopart Res. 2013;16:2429. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2429-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sureshkumar V, Daniel KSCG, Ruckmani K, Sivakumar M. Fabrication of chitosan–magnetite nanocomposite strip for chromium removal. Appl Nanosci. 2016;6:277. doi: 10.1007/s13204-015-0429-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Esmaeili A, Farrahi NT. The efficiency of a novel bioreactor employing bacteria and chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;59:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.08.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bhaumik M, Maity A, Srinivasu VV, Onyango MS. Enhanced removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using polypyrrole/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite. J Hazard Mater. 2011;190(1–3):381–390. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shalaby TI, Fikrt NM, Mohamed MM, El Kady MF. Preparation and characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan for removal of Cd(II) and Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. Water Sci Technol. 2014;70(6):1004–1010. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang S, Zhou Y, Nie W, Song L, Zhang T. Preparation of uniform magnetic chitosan microcapsules and their application in adsorbing copper ion(II) and chromium ion(III). Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51(43):14099–14106. doi: 10.1021/ie301942j [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jiang YJ, Yu XY, Luo T, Jia Y, Liu JH, Huang XJ. γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles encapsulated millimeter-sized magnetic chitosan beads for removal of Cr (VI) from water: thermodynamics, kinetics, regeneration, and uptake mechanisms. J Chem Eng Data. 2013;58(11):3142–3149. doi: 10.1021/je400603p [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Nanomedicine are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES