Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2019 Sep 12;58(41):14686–14693. doi: 10.1002/anie.201907117

Oxidation of Reduced Ceria by Incorporation of Hydrogen

Zhaorui Li 1,, Kristin Werner 2,, Kun Qian 1,, Rui You 1, Agata Płucienik 2, Aiping Jia 1,3, Lihui Wu 4, Liyuan Zhang 1, Haibin Pan 4, Helmut Kuhlenbeck 2, Shamil Shaikhutdinov 2, Weixin Huang 1,, Hans‐Joachim Freund 2,
PMCID: PMC6790607  PMID: 31403236

Abstract

The interaction of hydrogen with reduced ceria (CeO2−x) powders and CeO2−x(111) thin films was studied using several characterization techniques including TEM, XRD, LEED, XPS, RPES, EELS, ESR, and TDS. The results clearly indicate that both in reduced ceria powders as well as in reduced single crystal ceria films hydrogen may form hydroxyls at the surface and hydride species below the surface. The formation of hydrides is clearly linked to the presence of oxygen vacancies and is accompanied by the transfer of an electron from a Ce3+ species to hydrogen, which results in the formation of Ce4+, and thus in oxidation of ceria.

Keywords: ceria, hydrides, oxidation, powder, thin films


Oxidizing hydride: The incorporation of hydride species into reduced ceria causes oxidation of the oxide. Accompanying changes in the electronic structure of the oxide are investigated, as well as the thermal stability of the hydride species.

graphic file with name ANIE-58-14686-g007.jpg

Introduction

Hydrogen adsorption and dissociation on metal oxides are of great importance both fundamentally and industrially.1 Two mechanisms for H2 dissociation on metal oxide surfaces have been identified:2 One is the homolytic dissociation, which produces two hydrogen atoms at two oxygen sites, leading to the formation of two OH groups and the concomitant reduction of two surface metal ions; the other one is the heterolytic (polar) dissociation, which entails the formation of a hydride, H, and a proton, H+, at metal and oxygen sites, yielding M‐H and OH species, respectively. The H ad‐atoms on metal oxide surfaces can migrate into the subsurface region and further into the bulk to form hydroxyl and hydride species therein. As demonstrated by experimental and theoretical studies,3 the general trend is that heterolytic cleavage occurs on oxides which are difficult to reduce, such as MgO,4 Al2O3,5 and SiO2,6 whereas homolytic cleavage at two oxygen sites is thermodynamically favored for readily reducible oxides such as TiO2 and CeO2.7 However, heterolytic cleavage of H2 was also reported for readily reducible oxides, such as Ga2O3,8 Cr2O3,9 ZnO,10 and TiO2.11 On the latter, defects were observed to play a key role in stabilizing the hydride species. We demonstrate here, that in the presence of defects in ceria leading to a reduction of ceria and thus to the formation of Ce3+ species, hydrogen incorporation below the surface may trigger the formation of hydride species by transferring the 4f electron at a Ce3+ center to a hydrogen atom, which then occupies the oxygen vacancy.

Ceria (CeO2) has recently been studied as a selective catalyst in the partial hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes,12 which inspired strong interest in revisiting the H2‐ceria interaction. DFT calculations have suggested that the stoichiometric CeO2 surface kinetically favors the heterolytic dissociation of H2 to form Ce−H and OH species, and that the resulting Ce−H further evolves to the thermodynamically more stable OH species, accompanied with the reduction of CeIV to CeIII.12f, 13, 29 It was further reported that the presence of surface oxygen vacancies (Vo) on ceria not only facilitates the heterolytic dissociation of H2, but also enhances the stability of Ce‐H hydride species.12i, 14 Experimentally, surface oxygen vacancies on ceria were found to locally affect the reactivity of surface hydroxyl groups: While recombinative desorption as water is suppressed at high oxygen vacancy density, the production of H2 is favored.15 Recently, the first direct spectroscopic evidence for the presence of both surface and bulk Ce‐H species upon H2 dissociation over defect‐rich ceria nanorods was provided via in situ inelastic neutron scattering spectroscopy.16 Furthermore, H2 dissociation on a thin CeO2(111) film on Ru(0001) was observed at H2 pressures in the mbar regime.17 The resulting H species stay on the surface of stoichiometric CeO2(111), whereas H incorporation below the surface occurs on partially reduced CeO2−x(111) (x≈0.1–0.2). A reaction channel with bulk CeO2−x has recently also been identified for the incorporation of hydroxyls.18

In this paper, we discuss H2 adsorption on reduced ceria surfaces (CeO2−x powder and CeO2−x(111) thin films) at different pressures and adsorption temperatures. The combination of studies on atomically well‐defined CeO2−x(111) thin films and morphologically complex CeO2−x powder allows us to extract information on chemical processes on a model thin film and to verify their relevance on a realistic powder system. Our experiments reveal that reduced ceria is oxidized upon H2 adsorption, which provides further evidence for a novel type of H2 dissociation on ceria to form hydrides at oxygen vacancies. The results are presented in two parts: The first part summarizes the evidence for oxidation of reduced ceria upon hydride formation, taking into account both powder and single crystal thin film experiments, while the second part provides additional information on powder samples.

Results and Discussion

The structure of the ceria samples has been characterized by standard techniques, that is, by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X‐ray diffraction (XRD) for the powder samples, and low energy electron diffraction (LEED) for the single crystal thin films. The ceria powder consists of 20–50 nm large nanoparticles with irregular polyhedral or spherical shapes that show (111) lattice fringes of cubic fluorite CeO2 (Figure S1). CeO2 thin films exhibit (111) orientation and show a well‐resolved hexagonal LEED pattern under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions (Figure S2). Some reduced CeO2−x(111) films faintly show the 7×7 structure of CeO1.71(111) (Figure S2), as previously reported and analyzed by scanning probe and diffraction studies.19 CO titration experiments showed that the stoichiometric CeO2(111) film as well as the reduced CeO2−x(111) film are continuous and that only a negligible fraction of the Ru substrate is exposed. Using XPS in a series of annealing experiments, we found that both films are thermally stable in UHV up to at least 1000 K.

Figure 1 A a shows Ce 3d and O 1s X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results of the freshly prepared CeO2−x(111) thin film. Spectra where recorded in both normal (θ=0°) and grazing (surface‐sensitive) emission geometry (θ=60°), which differ in the angle θ between surface normal and XPS analyzer. We estimate that 95 % of the electrons in the Ce 3d region originate from the topmost ≈35 Å (≈17 Å) of the thin film in normal (grazing) emission.20 The Ce 3d XP spectrum shows characteristic peaks of Ce4+ species in three doublets, as well as of Ce3+ species in two additional doublets.19b, 21 The applied XPS peak fitting parameters and peak positions are described in detail in the Supporting Information. The relative Ce3+ concentration was calculated as the ratio of Ce3+ peak area over the whole Ce 3d region, that is, A(Ce3+)/[A(Ce3+)+A(Ce4+)]. We estimate that the maximum error of this procedure, due to the complexity of the Ce 3d spectrum and the uncertainty of the Shirley background, does not exceed ±10 %.19b, 21 With this, we estimate the Ce3+ concentration as 6 % within the topmost 35 Å and 17 % within the topmost 17 Å. This indicates that the concentration of Ce3+ species is larger close to the surface as compared to deeper layers. The O 1s XP spectrum for fresh CeO2−x(111) shows a main peak at 529.8 eV with a shoulder at 531.8 eV, originating from O2− ions and surface OH groups, respectively.22 The presence of hydroxyl species (in a comparably low density) can be explained by the dissociative adsorption of water (from the UHV background) over surface oxygen vacancies.15a

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A) Ce 3d and O 1s XP spectra of CeO2−x(111) thin film in normal (0°) and grazing (60°) emission geometry: a) Freshly prepared CeO2−x(111), b) CeO2−x(111) exposed to 10 mbar D2 at 300 K. B) Ce 3d XP and O 1s XP spectra of CeO2−x powder before (a) and after (b) exposure to 1 atm H2 at 303 K.

Figure 1 B a shows normal emission Ce 3d and O 1s XP spectra of pretreated CeO2−x powder (heated to 773 K for 30 min in UHV). Ce 3d XP spectra were fitted with Ce3+ and Ce4+ components according to previously well‐established procedures.23 The employed peak fitting procedure of Ce 4f XPS spectra of CeO2 powders gave the maximum error of ±11 %. The powder exhibits a Ce3+ concentration of 9.2 % within the topmost ≈35 Å, which indicates the presence of surface oxygen vacancies.20 The O 1s XP spectrum shows a main peak at 529.1 eV, originating from O2− ions, and two shoulders at 531.0 and 533.5 eV, corresponding to surface OH groups (concentration 10.2 %) and adsorbed water (3.5 %), respectively.22 The presence of both species results from the adsorption of water from the UHV background. The much higher concentration of hydroxyl species on the CeO2−x powder as compared to the CeO2−x(111) film, together with the presence of adsorbed water only on CeO2−x powder, suggest that the CeO2−x powder is more defective than the CeO2−x(111) film. In addition, surface‐sensitive valence band photoelectron spectra of CeO2−x powder (Figure S3) were obtained at photon energies of 124.5, 122, and 115 eV. These energies correspond to on‐resonance Ce4+ and Ce3+ 4d‐4f excitation and off‐resonance excitation, respectively. We estimate that 95 % of the photoelectrons in the valence band spectra originate from the topmost layers (≈15 Å) of the ceria powder.20 The calculated Ce3+ concentration of pretreated CeO2−x powder (heated to 773 K for 30 min in UHV) is 50.9 %, hence much higher than estimated from the Ce 3d XPS data. The increased value obtained from the surface‐sensitive valence band measurements indicates that Ce3+ is enriched in the near‐surface region of the pretreated CeO2−x powder. This observation is consistent with the results on the CeO2−x(111) thin film. We assume the concentration gradient of Ce3+ in both systems to follow that of oxygen vacancies from the surface (high concentration) towards deeper layers (lower concentration), since the formation of oxygen vacancies results in the reduction of Ce4+ species to Ce3+ in close proximity.24 Such a gradient in oxygen vacancy concentration has been observed before on related systems, such as CeO2−x(111) thin films19b, 19c and islands.25

Figures 1 A b and B b, respectively, show the electronic structure of reduced CeO2−x(111) and CeO2−x powder upon interaction with molecular hydrogen. The clean CeO2−x(111) thin film was exposed to 10 mbar D2 at 300 K for 15 min. Under similar experimental conditions, we previously observed negligible surface OH formation and incorporation of H species below the CeO2−x(111) surface.17 Figure 1 A b shows Ce 3d and O 1s XP spectra obtained after D2 exposure. In the Ce 3d spectra, the Ce3+ concentration significantly decreases after 10 mbar D2 exposure in both normal and grazing emission modes. The total peak area of Ce species, however, remains unchanged, which demonstrates that part of the Ce3+ species are transformed to Ce4+. Furthermore, the Ce:O stoichiometry of the film remains unchanged. The O 1s region shows a slight increase in OD signal (with respect to all O species), while the overall peak area of all O species stays unchanged within the experimental error margin. This suggests the formation of OD groups in small density. The absence of other clear signals in the O region indicates that the sample, even after exposure to 10 mbar of D2, is largely free from contaminants like adsorbed water or carbonates. These findings demonstrate that through exposure to D2, Ce3+ in CeO2−x(111) films may be oxidized to Ce4+. This phenomenon occurs both in surface‐near and deeper layers.

The CeO2−x powder was exposed to 1 atm H2 at 303 K for 1 h. Subsequently measured Ce 3d and O 1s XP spectra are shown in Figure 1 B b. The total peak areas of Ce species and O species, as well as the O/Ce ratio remain unchanged after H2 treatment (Figure S4). The Ce3+ concentration decreases from 9.2 % to 6.5 %, which implies hydrogen adsorption‐induced oxidation. Such an oxidation phenomenon can be clearly seen by a direct comparison of Ce 3d XP spectra of CeO2−x powder before and after the exposure to 1 atm H2 at 303 K (Figure S5). This agrees with the results obtained on the CeO2−x(111) thin film. The less extensive oxidation of CeO2−x powder upon H2 treatment as compared to the CeO2−x(111) thin film may arise from the pronounced morphological differences between powder and single crystal surfaces, and especially from a higher density of defects on the powder sample. The O 1s XP spectrum shows that the OH concentration increases from 10.2 % to 15.1 % after H2 treatment, while the concentration of adsorbed water decreases slightly from 3.5 % to 3.0 %. The increase of OH density implies that H2 dissociates on the powder surface at 303 K to form OH species, which is expected to increase the Ce3+ concentration:13b, 15a, 26

H2+2O2-+2Ce4+2OH-ads+2Ce3+ (1)

The changes in Ce3+ concentration in the CeO2−x powder upon H2 treatment were also examined by Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) spectroscopy (Figure 2). ESR is a Ce3+‐sensitive technique, which probes both the surface and the bulk of ceria. Before exposure to H2, the CeO2−x powder shows a Ce3+ ESR feature at g of 1.967 and g of 1.940,27 suggesting the presence of oxygen vacancies. Further observed features, which are apparent also for the as‐received powder (Figure S6), are typical of nuclei with I=5/2.28 We tentatively attribute these signals to unreactive impurities. After H2 exposure (1 atm, 303 K, 1 h), the Ce3+ ESR feature weakens significantly to 17 % of the ESR signal before exposure. In agreement with the XPS data, these ESR results clearly imply the oxidation of Ce3+ to Ce4+ by H2 treatment at 303 K. Since the ESR measurement probes a larger depth than XPS, we conclude that oxidation of Ce3+ readily occurs also in deeper layers.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ESR spectra of CeO2−x powder before and after exposure to 1 atm H2 at 303 K, and after subsequent purging in He at 773 K.

The oxidation of the CeO2−x(111) thin film upon H2 exposure at 300 K is further confirmed by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) of valence electron excitations across the band gap with loss energies up to 10 eV (Figure 3). The EEL spectra of CeO2(111) and CeO2−x(111) films are similar to those reported by Pfau and Schierbaum.29 The optical band gap of CeO2 with a width of ≈3.5 eV26 gives rise to the flat area below ≈3 eV, and the structures in the spectrum of stoichiometric CeO2(111) are all due to transitions from the O 2p valence band to empty cerium states. In the case of reduced CeO2−x(111), additional transitions with Ce 4f initial states arise. Reduction has a massive effect on the spectrum of the ceria surface, since it modifies the local electronic structure and is expected to change the local geometry. After exposure of the reduced CeO2−x(111) film to 10 mbar H2 at 300 K, the spectrum becomes very similar to that of the stoichiometric CeO2(111) surface, although the observed features are somewhat weaker. This indicates that the resulting H species within the CeO2−x(111) film can restore the valence band structure to that of the stoichiometric surface. This does not only demonstrate that H2 adsorption induces oxidation of Ce3+ to Ce4+, but also that it re‐establishes the atomic structure of the stoichiometric surface, since the valence band structure depends sensitively on the atomic positions. In addition to transitions from the O 2p initial states, the spectrum of the hydrogenated film should also include transitions from H 1s initial states. These features, however, are rather weak in intensity, and are hidden below the regular CeO2 transitions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

EELS spectra of differently prepared CeO2(111) thin film surfaces. Reduction of CeO2(111) to CeO2−x(111) was achieved by annealing in UHV. The reduced CeO2−x(111) film was then exposed to 10 mbar H2 at 300 K for 15 min. The spectra were recorded in sequence from the bottom to the top.

The electronic changes that occur upon H2 adsorption on reduced ceria powder and CeO2−x(111) thin films clearly demonstrate a H2‐induced oxidation at 300 K, which constitutes a novel interaction of hydrogen with reduced ceria. Charge transfer from Ce3+/oxygen vacancy sites to H species oxidizes Ce3+ to Ce4+. We thus propose that H may be stabilized as a hydride (Ce4+‐H) at these sites. The oxidation of reduced ceria takes place in near‐surface regions, as well as in the ceria bulk. An apparent difference between the experiments on CeO2−x(111) thin films and CeO2−x powder is that H2 exposure leads to a full oxidation of CeO2−x(111), while CeO2−x powder is partially oxidized. We attribute this difference to the dissimilarities in morphological structure between the two systems, that is, the presence of non‐(111) oriented facets, a higher density of structural surface defects, and potential impurities on the CeO2−x powder.

Furthermore, we investigated the thermal stability of Ce4+‐H hydride species within CeO2−x powder and CeO2−x(111) thin films. We flashed the 10 mbar D2‐exposed CeO2−x(111) thin film in UHV stepwise to elevated temperatures and recorded grazing emission Ce 3d XP spectra in between heating steps (Figure S7). A plot of the relative Ce3+ concentration versus flashing temperature (Figure 4 A) shows that the oxidation state of CeO2−x(111) is recovered in two steps. Partial recovery of Ce3+ takes place at T<450 K, while almost complete recovery happens above 800 K. O 1s spectra (not shown) indicate that the O concentration remains unchanged after flashing to 1000 K, which verifies that the distribution of O species in the film is not related to the change in oxidation state.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ce3+ concentration in CeO2−x before and after H2 treatment and subsequent (stepwise) heating: A) CeO2−x(111) thin films before (I) and after (II) D2 exposure (10 mbar, 15 min, 300 K) and subsequent flashing to indicated temperatures. Ce3+ concentration evaluated from grazing emission Ce 3d XPS. B) CeO2−x powder before (I) and after (II) H2 exposure (1 atm, 1 h, 303 K) and subsequent annealing at indicated temperatures (1 h for T>303 K). Ce3+ concentration evaluated from normal emission Ce 3d XPS.

In a similar experiment, 1 atm H2‐exposed CeO2−x powder was annealed at elevated temperatures for 1 h in UHV, and normal emission XP spectra were acquired in between annealing steps (Figure S8). The relative concentration of Ce3+ as a function of the annealing temperature is shown in Figure 4 B. Upon annealing at 423 K, the Ce3+ concentration rises from 6.5 % to 10.1 %, which is higher than the original concentration on the ceria powder before H2 exposure (9.2 %). With increasing annealing temperature, the Ce3+ concentration furthermore increases slightly, and finally reaches 10.8 % upon annealing at 773 K. Similarly, when the H2‐exposed CeO2−x powder is purged in He at 773 K for 1 h, ESR (see Figure 2) shows an increase in Ce3+ concentration to 120 % with respect to the CeO2−x powder before H2 treatment. We relate the clear increase of Ce3+ concentration upon annealing to the disappearance of Ce4+‐H hydride species, which recovers Ce3+/oxygen vacancy sites. The increase in Ce3+ concentration to values above the original Ce3+ concentration before H2 exposure, as observed in both XPS and ESR measurements, may be explained by H2 dissociation to form surface hydroxyls and eventually water, which results in reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+.

In order to verify that indeed the disappearance of hydride species results in the recovery of Ce3+, we followed desorption from the ceria powder by thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS).

Figure 5 shows H2O and H2 TDS curves of CeO2−x powder before and after H2 treatment and subsequent He purging at 303 K. H2O desorbs from the unexposed CeO2−x powder in a broad desorption feature at 425 K, which arises from recombinative desorption of surface hydroxyl groups and desorption of molecularly adsorbed water.15b Both species originate from adsorption of residual water on the CeO2−x powder. No desorption of H2 is observed. After exposure to 1 atm H2 and subsequent purging at 303 K, the TDS curves show a similar symmetric H2O desorption peak at 440 K with a very weak high‐temperature shoulder up to 700 K, caused by recombinative desorption of surface hydroxyls.15a Meanwhile, H2 desorbs from the H2‐exposed ceria powder at 440 K, hence in the same temperature range where recovery of Ce3+ was observed by XPS. To exclude that the observed desorption of H2 at 440 K is related to desorption of surface hydroxyls, we followed their concentration by O 1s XPS in between annealing steps. Figure 6 shows the concentration of hydroxyl groups on the CeO2−x powder before and after H2 treatment and subsequent annealing. The OH concentration remains approximately unchanged upon annealing to 523 K, and decreases only with further annealing at 623 K and 773 K. Hydroxyl groups hence desorb from the ceria powder at T>523 K, that is, at temperatures higher than where H2 desorption and most pronounced recovery of Ce3+ species are observed. We therefore conclude that these phenomena are not related to desorption of surface hydroxyls, but to the recombinative desorption of Ce4+−H species as H2. Corresponding results of water adsorbed on the CeO2−x powder (Figure S9) show that molecular water desorption mainly occurs before 450 K, consistent with the TDS observations.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

H2 (black) and H2O (red) TDS spectra of CeO2−x powder before (bottom) and after exposure to 1 atm H2 at 303 K and subsequent purging in He at 303 K (top).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

OH concentration on CeO2−x powder before (I) and after H2 treatment (1 atm, 1 h, 303 K) and subsequent (stepwise) annealing (1 h at indicated temperature for T>303 K) (II). OH concentration evaluated from normal emission O 1s XPS.

While CeO2−x(111) thin films and CeO2−x powders are significantly different in their morphology and defect density, we see a remarkable agreement in the thermal stability of the observed hydride species. In both systems, the Ce3+ concentration is (partially) recovered upon heating to 450 K.

According to our results, we suggest the following description of the adsorption of H2 at Ce3+/oxygen vacancy sites (Ce3+ Vo) and the corresponding recombinative desorption. Please note that these are net equations, and that intermediate steps may occur.

H2+2Ce3+VoRT2Ce4+Vo-H- (2)
2Ce4+Vo-H-Δ,450KH2+2Ce3+Vo (3)

At RT, H2 dissociates at Ce3+ Vo sites to form Ce4+ Vo−H hydride species, oxidizing the Ce3+ Vo species to Ce4+ Vo. Upon heating, Ce4+ Vo−H species recombine and desorb as H2, which recovers the Ce3+ Vo oxidation state.

The interaction of H2 with CeO2 has been intensely studied by DFT calculations.12f, 12h, 13, 14 The interaction of H2 and oxygen vacancy sites, however, has not yet been fully explored. DFT calculation results [12h] show that H2 adsorbs at a surface oxygen vacancy site of the CeO2(111) surface (oxygen vacancy concentration: 1.85 %) with an adsorption energy of −0.19 eV (H2+Vo→H2*) and that its heterolytic dissociation to OH and Ce−H species is exothermic (H2*→H*‐O+H*‐Ce, E=−0.56 eV) and proceeds with an activation barrier of 0.52 eV. The transformation of CeH species into OH species, although exothermic (H*‐Ce→H*‐O, E=−1.47 eV), needs to overcome a barrier of 1.64 eV. From these data, we calculated that the dissociation of H2 on the CeO2(111) surface with an oxygen vacancy concentration of 1.85 % to form two Ce−H hydride species is endothermic (E=0.72 eV). However, the hydride species on an oxide surface is more stabilized as the oxygen vacancy concentration increases.11a Therefore, under our experimental conditions of high‐pressure H2 interaction with CeO2−x samples at RT, the observed oxidation by the overwhelming formation of CeH species should be likely. Meanwhile, the recombinative reaction of OH and CeH species to H2, although endothermic (E=0.56 eV), only needs to overcome a barrier of 1.08 eV. This implies that the recombinative reaction of the Ce4+ Vo‐H species to H2 should be kinetically favored over its transformation into OH species.

Conclusion

Via a comprehensive study of H2 adsorption on reduced CeO2−x(111) thin films and CeO2−x powders at room temperature, we have provided insights into a novel mechanism of hydrogen adsorption within ceria. In the presence of oxygen vacancies, H species may bind to Ce3+ Vo sites in the form of hydrides. The formation of a hydride species, Ce4+ Vo−H, is achieved via electron transfer from Ce3+ Vo to hydrogen, thereby oxidizing Ce3+ to Ce4+. At the same time, the valence structure of fully oxidized CeO2 is recovered. Upon heating, Ce4+ Vo−H species recombine to desorb as H2, while the Ce3+ Vo sites, and thereby the initial oxidation state, are recovered. The observed desorption of H2 is not related to desorption of surface hydroxyls.

These results not only broaden our fundamental understandings of elementary surface reactions of H2 on oxide surfaces, but also demonstrate the powerful approach of combining well‐defined single crystal model systems and corresponding powder systems in fundamental studies. The reactivity of the Ce4+ Vo−H species, particularly in hydrogenation reactions, is currently under investigation in our laboratory.

Experimental Section

Powder studies were performed on commercial CeO2 powder (Sigma Aldrich, Ref. 700290). Experiments on the powder samples were carried out with H2, He and Ar (purity >99.999 %, Nanjing Shangyuan Industrial Factory) and D2 (purity >99.99 %, Suzhou Changyou Gas Co., Ltd.).

TEM and HRTEM images of ceria powder were recorded on JEOL‐2010 and JEOL‐2100F setups at an electron acceleration voltage of 200 kV. XRD patterns were recorded on a Philips X'Pert Pro Super diffractometer, with a Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.15418 nm) source, operating at 40 kV and 50 mA.

XPS measurements of ceria powders were carried out on a Thermo Scientific Escalab 250Xi setup, equipped with an ambient‐pressure preparation chamber, using an Al Kα (=1486.6 eV) source. Reference spectra of the powder were obtained at room temperature after pretreatment at 773 K in vacuum for 30 min. Then the sample was transferred to the preparation chamber, heated in 1 atm H2 at desired temperatures for 1 h, and cooled in H2 to room temperature. XP spectra were measured after transfer to the analysis chamber in vacuum. Further spectra were obtained after subsequent annealing at a desired temperature for 1 h, and cooling to room temperature.

Synchrotron radiation photoelectron spectroscopy (SREPS) of ceria powder was performed on the photoelectron spectroscopy end‐station of the BL10B beamline in the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (Hefei, China), which is equipped with a high‐pressure preparation chamber. The beamline is connected to a bending magnet and equipped with three gratings that cover photon energies from 100 to 1000 eV with a typical photon flux of 1×1010 photons s−1 and a resolution (EE) better than 1000. The analysis chamber connected to the beamline is equipped with a VG Scienta R3000 electron energy analyzer for SRPES measurements. A reference spectrum was obtained after pretreatment at 773 K in vacuum for 30 min and subsequent cooling. Then the sample was transferred into the preparation chamber, heated in 10 atm H2 at 773 K for 1 h, and subsequently cooled to room temperature. SRPES measurements of the H2‐treated powder were obtained after transfer in vacuum to the analysis chamber. Further spectra were obtained after subsequent annealing at various temperatures. Ce 3d, O 1s, and C 1s XPS spectra were measured using a Mg Kα (=1253.6 eV) source, and valence band spectra in the Ce 4d‐4f photon absorption region were measured with photons of 124.5 and 122 eV for on‐resonance spectra and of 115 eV for off‐resonance spectra.

To record TDS curves, 100 mg ceria powder were placed in a high‐pressure stainless steel tube, pretreated at 773 K for 2 h in He (flow rate 30 mL min−1), and then cooled to 303 K. The gas stream was switched to H2 with a flow rate of 30 mL min−1 at the desired pressures. The powder was heated to the desired temperatures at a heating rate of 10 K min−1 and kept there for 1 h. Then the powder was cooled to 303 K, purged in He, and heated to 773 K (10 K min−1), during which the H2 and H2O signals were monitored to give corresponding TDS data.

The high‐pressure stainless steel tube was equipped with two valves that were closed to seal the powder sample from ambient atmosphere. After H2 treatment and cooling to 303 K (in H2 or He), the tube was sealed and re‐opened in an Ar‐filled glovebox (Mikrouna Co. Ltd., China, O2 concentrations below 0.1 ppm), wherein 120 mg of the powder sample were sealed into an electron spin resonance (ESR) sample tube. ESR spectra were recorded at 140 K on a JEOL JES‐FA200 ESR spectrometer (9.087 GHz) at a microwave power of 0.998 mW, a modulation frequency of 100 kHz, and a modulation amplitude of 0.35 mT.

CeO2−x(111) thin film preparation, H2 treatment, and corresponding XPS and EELS measurements were performed in two UHV systems with a base pressure of ≈1×10−10 mbar, which are described in detail elsewhere.17, 30 Following an established recipe,17 a ≈6–10 nm thick film of stoichiometric CeO2(111) was prepared on a Ru(0001) substrate (MaTeck) by molecular beam epitaxy in an O2‐rich environment. To prepare the reduced CeO2−x(111) thin film, the stoichiometric CeO2(111) film was annealed at 1200 K for 20 min. Before any experiment, the sample was flashed to 650 K to desorb surface impurities (especially adsorbed water from residual gas). The film was exposed to D2 (Linde, purity 99.999 %) or H2 (Linde, purity 99.9999 %) at 10 mbar for 15 min in the preparation chamber and then transferred to the analysis chamber in vacuum. Possible traces of water in the gas handling lines were eliminated by use of a cold trap (liquid N2).

LEED was performed on a Specs ErLEEED 1000‐A setup. XP spectra of CeO2−x(111) thin films were recorded using an Al Kα (Specs XR 50, =1486.6 eV) source and a hemispherical analyzer (Specs Phoibos 150 MCD, pass energy 20 eV). EELS data were recorded with a Delta 0.5 spectrometer manufactured by VSW. The electron incidence angle with respect to the surface normal was set to 60° and the energy of the electron beam was 46 eV.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Key R & D Program of MOST (2017YFB0602205), the DFG‐NSFC joint project (Nos. FR554/18‐1 and 21761132005), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21525313, 91745202) and the Changjiang Scholars Program of Ministry of Education of China for financial support.

Z. Li, K. Werner, K. Qian, R. You, A. Płucienik, A. Jia, L. Wu, L. Zhang, H. Pan, H. Kuhlenbeck, S. Shaikhutdinov, W. Huang, H.-J. Freund, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14686.

Contributor Information

Prof. Dr. Weixin Huang, Email: huangwx@ustc.edu.cn.

Prof. Dr. Hans‐Joachim Freund, Email: freund@fhi-berlin.mpg.de.

References

  • 1. Más-Balleste R., Lledós A. in Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II: From Elements to Applications, Vol. 9 (Eds.: J. Reedijk, K. Poeppelmeier), Elsevier, Oxford, 2013, p. 727. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. 
  • 2a. Henrich V. E., Cox P. A., The Surface Science of Metal Oxides, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, p. 247; [Google Scholar]
  • 2b. Fierro J. L. G., Metal Oxides: Chemistry and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Copéret C., Estes D. P., Larmier K., Searles K., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 8463–8505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. 
  • 4a. Gribov E. N., Bertarione S., Scarano D., Lamberti C., Spoto G., Zecchina A., J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 16174–16186; [Google Scholar]
  • 4b. Chen H.-Y. T., Giordano L., Pacchioni G., J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 10623–10629. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Joubert J., Salameh A., Krakoviack V., Delbecq F., Sautet P., Copéret C., Basset J. M., J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 23944–23950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Martin D., Duprez D., J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 4428–4436. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. 
  • 7a. Binet C., Daturi M., Lavalley J.-C., Catal. Today 1999, 50, 207–225; [Google Scholar]
  • 7b. Chen H.-T., Choi Y. M., Liu M., Lin M. C., ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 849–855; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7c. Menetrey M., Markovits A., Minot C., Surf. Sci. 2003, 524, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Meriaudeau P., Primet M., J. Mol. Catal. 1990, 61, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Busca G., J. Catal. 1989, 120, 303–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. 
  • 10a. Eischens R. P., Pliskin W. A., Low M. J. D., J. Catal. 1962, 1, 180–191; [Google Scholar]
  • 10b. Dent A. L., Kokes R. J., J. Phys. Chem. 1969, 73, 3781–3790; [Google Scholar]
  • 10c. Becker T., Hövel S., Kunat M., Boas C., Burghaus U., Wöll C., Surf. Sci. 2001, 486, L502–L506. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. 
  • 11a. Wu Z., Zhang W., Xiong F., Yuan Q., Jin Y., Yang J., Huang W., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 7051–7057; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11b. Wu Z., Xiong F., Wang Z., Huang W., Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 752–756. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. 
  • 12a. Vilé G., Bridier B., Wichert J., Pérez-Ramírez J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8620–8623; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 8748–8751; [Google Scholar]
  • 12b. Carrasco J., Vilé G., Fernández-Torre D., Pérez R., Pérez-Ramírez J., Ganduglia-Pirovano M. V., J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 5352–5360; [Google Scholar]
  • 12c. Vilé G., Wrabetz S., Floryan L., Schuster M. E., Girgsdies F., Teschner D., Pérez-Ramírez J., ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1928–1934; [Google Scholar]
  • 12d. Vilé G., Dähler P., Vecchietti J., Baltanás M., Collins S., Calatayud M., Bonivardi A., Pérez-Ramírez J., J. Catal. 2015, 324, 69–78; [Google Scholar]
  • 12e. Vilé G., Colussi S., Krumeich F., Trovarelli A., Pérez-Ramírez J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12069–12072; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 12265–12268; [Google Scholar]
  • 12f. García-Melchor M., Bellarosa L., López N., ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 4015–4020; [Google Scholar]
  • 12g. Zhang S., Huang Z.-Q., Ma Y., Gao W., Li J., Cao F., Li L., Chang C.-R., Qu Y., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15266; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12h. Riley C., Zhou S., Kunwar D., De La Riva A., Peterson E., Payne R., Gao L., Lin S., Guo H., Datye A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 12964–12973; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12i. Cao T., You R., Zhang X., Chen S., Li D., Zhang Z., Huang W., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 9659–9670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. 
  • 13a. Fernández-Torre D., Carrasco J., Ganduglia-Pirovano M. V., Pérez R., J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 014703; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13b. Negreiros F. R., Camellone M. F., Fabris S., J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 21567–21573; [Google Scholar]
  • 13c. García-Melchor M., López N., J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 10921–10926. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Huang Z.-Q., Liu L.-P., Qi S., Zhang S., Qu Y., Chang C.-R., ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 546–554. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. 
  • 15a. Chen B., Ma Y., Ding L., Xu L., Wu Z., Yuan Q., Huang W., J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 5800–5810; [Google Scholar]
  • 15b. Gao Y., Li R., Chen S., Luo L., Cao T., Huang W., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 31862–31871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wu Z., Cheng Y., Tao F., Daemen L., Foo G. S., Nguyen L., Zhang X., Beste A., Ramirez-Cuesta A. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9721–9727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Werner K., Weng X., Calaza F., Sterrer M., Kropp T., Paier J., Sauer J., Wilde M., Fukutani K., Shaikhutdinov S., Freund H.-J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17608–17676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dvořák F., Szabová L., Johánek V., Farnesi Camellone M., Stetsovych V., Vorokhta M., Tovt A., Skála T., Matolínová I., Tateyama Y., Mysliveček J., Fabris S., Matolín V., ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4354–4363. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. 
  • 19a. Olbrich R., Murgida G. E., Ferrari V., Barth C., Llois A. M., Reichling M., Ganduglia-Pirovano M. V., J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 6844–6851; [Google Scholar]
  • 19b. Duchoň T., Dvořák F., Aulická M., Stetsovych V., Vorokhta M., Mazur D., Veltruská K., Skála T., Mysliveček J., Matolínová I., Matolín V., J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 357–365; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19c. Duchoň T., Dvořák F., Aulická M., Stetsovych V., Vorokhta M., Mazur D., Veltruská K., Skála T., Mysliveček J., Matolínová I., Matolín V., J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 5058–5059; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19d. Wilkens H., Schuckmann O., Oelke R., Gevers S., Schaefer A., Bäumer M., Zoellner M. H., Schroeder T., Wollschläger J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 111602; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19e. Grinter D. C., Muryn C., Sala A., Yim C.-M., Pang C. L., Menteş T. O., Locatelli A., Thornton G., J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 11037–11044. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.S. Tanuma, C. J. Powell, D. R. Penn, Surf. Interface Anal 1993, 20, 77–89.
  • 21. Lykhach Y., Kozlov S. M., Skála T., Tovt A., Stetsovych V., Tsud N., Dvořák F., Johánek V., Neitzel A., Mysliveček J., Fabris S., Matolín V., Neyman K. M., Libuda J., Nat. Mater. 2015, 15, 284–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lykhach Y., Johánek V., Aleksandrov H. A., Kozlov S. M., Happel M., Skála T., Petkov P. S., Tsud N., Vayssilov G. N., Prince K. C., Neyman K. M., Matolín V., Libuda J., J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 12103–12113. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. 
  • 23a. Laachir A., Perrichon V., Badri A., Lamotte J., Catherine E., Lavalley J. C., El Fallah J., Hilaire L., Le Normand F., Quemere E., Sauvion G. N., Touret O., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1991, 87, 1601–1609; [Google Scholar]
  • 23b. Ernesto P., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2018, 30, 343003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. 
  • 24a. Paier J., Penschke C., Sauer J., Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3949–3985; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24b. Fabris S., Vicario G., Balducci G., de Gironcoli S., Baroni S., J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 22860–22867; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24c. Yang Z., Woo T. K., Baudin M., Hermansson K., J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 7741–7749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Höcker J., Menteş T. O., Sala A., Locatelli A., Schmidt T., Falta J., Senanayake S. D., Flege J. I., Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 2, 1500314. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Vangelista S., Piagge R., Ek S., Sarnet T., Ghidini G., Martella C., Lamperti A., Thin Solid Films 2017, 636, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Abi-aad E., Bechara R., Grimblot J., Aboukais A., Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 793–797. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Weil J. A., Bolton J. R., Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Elementary Theory and Practical Applications, Wiley, Hoboken, 2007, pp. 73–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pfau A., Schierbaum K. D., Surf. Sci. 1994, 321, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Richter N. F., Feiten F. E., Pal J., Płucienik A., Emmez E., Shaikhutdinov S., Kuhlenbeck H., Risse T., Freund H.-J., Goikoetxea I., Włodarczyk R., Sauer J., J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 7110–7117. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES