Skip to main content
The ISME Journal logoLink to The ISME Journal
. 2019 Jun 27;13(11):2701–2713. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0453-5

Phosphate availability affects fixed nitrogen transfer from diazotrophs to their epibionts

Niels J Schoffelen 1, Wiebke Mohr 1,, Timothy G Ferdelman 1, Julia Duerschlag 1, Sten Littmann 1, Helle Ploug 2, Marcel M M Kuypers 1
PMCID: PMC6794295  PMID: 31249392

Abstract

Dinitrogen (N2) fixation is a major source of external nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems and therefore exerts control over productivity. Studies have shown that N2 -fixers release freshly fixed N into the environment, but the causes for this N release are largely unclear. Here, we show that the availability of phosphate can directly affect the transfer of freshly fixed N to epibionts in filamentous, diazotrophic cyanobacteria. Stable-isotope incubations coupled to single-cell analyses showed that <1% and ~15% of freshly fixed N was transferred to epibionts of Aphanizomenon and Nodularia, respectively, at phosphate scarcity during a summer bloom in the Baltic Sea. When phosphate was added, the transfer of freshly fixed N to epibionts dropped to about half for Nodularia, whereas the release from Aphanizomenon increased slightly. At the same time, the growth rate of Nodularia roughly doubled, indicating that less freshly fixed N was released and was used for biomass production instead. Phosphate scarcity and the resulting release of freshly fixed N could explain the heavy colonization of Nodularia filaments by microorganisms during summer blooms. As such, the availability of phosphate may directly affect the partitioning of fixed N2 in colonies of diazotrophic cyanobacteria and may impact the interactions with their microbiome.

Subject terms: Biogeochemistry, Microbial ecology

Introduction

The availability of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) often limits primary productivity in aquatic ecosystems. The activity of dinitrogen (N2)-fixing microorganisms (diazotrophs) alleviates the nitrogen (N) limitation either directly when diazotrophs are also photoautotrophs or indirectly through the release of fixed N to the microbial community. This fixed N can be released or transferred to the microbial community via several pathways, ranging from cell death [1], viral lysis [2, 3], break-up of cells during grazing [4], to active or passive release of inorganic and organic nitrogen compounds (e.g., ref. [5]). The nitrogenous compounds are then available to other microorganisms [610] and can subsequently fuel the activity and growth of higher trophic levels [9, 1115]. In addition, diazotrophically fixed N can also be exported from the upper water column either by grazing and subsequent transport of fecal pellets to deeper waters, direct export through sinking (e.g., diatom–diazotroph associations [16]), or aggregation and export of marine snow aggregates. Whether diazotrophically fixed N is channeled through the microbial loop or is exported directly could then have profound effects on the turnover and productivity of surface waters [9, 14, 17, 18].

A large portion of N2 fixation in aquatic ecosystems is carried out by filamentous cyanobacteria that can form millimeter-large, visible colonies. The non-heterocystous, colonial Trichodesmium sp. has been suggested to account for up to half of the marine N2 fixation [1921], while the heterocystous Aphanizomenon sp. and Nodularia sp. are important contributors to N2 fixation in brackish and freshwater environments (e.g., refs [2224]). Although grazing of filamentous diazotrophs and direct export of their biomass to deeper waters has been observed (e.g., refs [12, 25]), the majority of its fixed N appears to be channeled through the microbial loop and thereby fuels productivity in surface waters [12, 26, 27] with significant contributions to net production in some environments [16, 28].

A relatively large fraction of the total N2 fixed might be released to the surrounding water or microbial community. Several field and culture studies have reported the production of dissolved N compounds (often as ammonium or amino acids) from N2 fixation and/or their transfer to other organisms (e.g., [5, 6, 9, 29]). The observed release is often higher in natural environments [30] than in culture studies [31, 32], presumably due to the absence of factors potentially promoting N release in culture experiments (such as grazing, nutrient limitation, stress [32]). A co-culture study observed that the growth of both microbial partners (an N2-fixer and a non-N2-fixer) was promoted through N release relative to the growth in mono-cultures [33], suggesting that N release by an N2-fixer could be mutually beneficial in a natural microbial community. The causes for N release in natural environments are, however, often not known. Studies on photosynthesis have put forward several mechanisms for the causes on the release of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), including passive diffusion, photosynthetic overflow, autocatalytic cell death, photorespiration, resource acquisition, defense mechanisms, infochemicals, and density reduction [34]. While these may not be directly transferable to N release, these mechanisms might offer some insight into the causes for N release, particularly in photoautotrophic N2-fixing microorganisms. Increased release of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from phytoplankton, primarily as photosynthetic overflow [34], previously has been linked to nutrient limitation [35]. Iron (Fe) and phosphorus (P) are well known to impact the activity of diazotrophs [3638]. Nevertheless, very little is known about the function of nutrient limitation on the release of diazotrophically fixed N2. Indirect evidence that the availability of inorganic P (i.e., phosphate or DIP) could affect the release of fixed N has come from increases in DIN concentration during DIP limitation [39]. In view of the sparsity of studies and the difficulty of teasing apart individual organisms and their physiology in environmental studies, the extent, magnitude, and mechanisms of fixed N release in the environment remains mostly unresolved.

The Baltic Sea endures recurring cyanobacterial summer blooms with high N2 fixation rates; in fact, it harbors some of the highest rates measured in any aquatic system [24]. In the central Baltic Sea, the main N2-fixing organisms are the cyanobacteria Aphanizomenon sp., Dolichospermum spp., and/or Nodularia spumigena (e.g., [23]). Aphanizomenon colonies usually contain few epibionts and little is known about their identity [40, 41]. In contrast, Nodularia colonies harbor associated microorganisms distinct from the surrounding seawater [42], including members of the proteobacteria and the CytophagaFlavobacteriumBacteroides group [42, 43]. Nodularia shows little overgrowth earlier in the season, but dense epibiont colonization at later stages [44, 45], which is accompanied by changes in the structure of the associated microbial community [42]. Closely associated microorganisms isolated from Nodularia colonies have been shown to be both beneficial and detrimental to the cyanobacterial growth [43]. The release and transfer of freshly fixed N in these blooms has previously been documented for both cyanobacteria (e.g., ref. [9]), but the underlying mechanisms are unclear.

Considering the very low DIP concentrations encountered in the late summer bloom, the Baltic Sea provided the ideal site to employ a combination of stable isotope incubations and single-cell techniques to (1) determine the degree of P limitation within colonies of the heterocystous diazotrophic cyanobacteria Aphanizomenon and Nodularia, (2) measure the transfer of fixed N and carbon (C) to associated epibionts of the cyanobacteria, and (3) test whether DIP availability plays a role in the transfer, under low DIP concentrations in a Baltic Sea summer bloom.

Material and methods

Sampling and experimental setup

The sampling and experimental setup corresponds to that described in Schoffelen et al. [46]. For context and reference, this section describes the same experiments (with some additional subsampling), which are also summarized as a sketch in Supplementary Fig. S1. Subsamples exclusively presented in Schoffelen et al. [46], for example, colony-based DIP uptake, are not included here. Field sampling was carried out on three occasions in August 2015 (6th, 8th, and 12th August) at the Swedish National Marine Monitoring site B1 (58°48′18″N, 17°37′52″E), located close to the Askö Marine Research Station (Baltic Sea Center) at the south-eastern coast of Sweden, using a motor-driven boat. Surface waters were collected in a 30-L high-density polyethylene container (Nalgene) by submerging the container in the surface water from the side of the boat. Colonies of filamentous cyanobacteria were gathered by lowering a plankton net (mesh size 20 μm) down to ~3 m depth, hauling it up to the surface and transferring the collected material to a 2.5-L polycarbonate bottle until further processing in the laboratory. Both surface waters and collected colonies were transported back to the Askö Marine Research Station within 30 min after sampling. In the first experiment (6th August 2015), the surface water was subsampled for nutrient concentrations and bulk DIP uptake rates using the radiotracer 33P (see section below). The second experiment (8th August 2015) was carried out as described for the first experiment with the addition of:

  1. bulk rates of CO2 and N2 fixation (see section below),

  2. incubations for single-cell rates of CO2 and N2 fixation by cyanobacteria and the transfer of freshly fixed C and N to their epibionts using the stable isotopes NaH13CO3 and 15N2, respectively, at in situ DIP concentrations (see section below; here, also trace amounts of 33P-DIP were added and the cyanobacterial single-cell DIP uptake rates have been published in [46]), and

  3. subsamples for cyanobacteria and epibiont characterization (see section below).

The third experiment (12th August 2015) was carried out as described for the first experiment with the addition of single-cell rates of CO2 and N2 fixation by cyanobacteria and the transfer of freshly fixed C and N to their epibionts using the stable isotopes NaH13CO3 and 15N2, respectively, but under artificially increased (+1 μmol L−1) DIP concentration. All incubations were carried out in a temperature-controlled and light-controlled room that was set for in situ conditions measured on the sampling day at station B1 at a 1–2 m water depth (17.4–18.0 °C, ~280 μmol photons m−2 s−1 light irradiance, 18 h:6 h light–dark cycle). All sampling and incubation equipment was cleaned with a phosphorus-free detergent (Decon90, Decon Laboratories Limited) and acid washed (HCl) prior to use to minimize nutrient contaminations during sampling or labeling experiments. The description of nutrient sample collection, analysis, and the nutrient data (DIP) have been published in Schoffelen et al. [46].

Bulk CO2 and N2 fixation rates

CO2 and N2 fixation rates in the bulk seawater were measured following the modified bubble method described by Klawonn et al. [47]. Water collected at station B1 was transferred to four 2.5-L polycarbonate bottles and capped headspace-free. To three of the four bottles, isotopically enriched sodium bicarbonate (NaH13CO3, ≥98 atom%, Sigma-Aldrich) and N2 gas (15N2, ≥99 atom%, lot number I-17299, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) were added through the septum caps. The 15N2 gas was tested for trace contamination of 15NH4+ using the hypobromite oxidation method [48] prior to the experiments, and no contamination was detected. The bottles were gently agitated for 15 min, the gas bubble was then released, and the bottle was again capped headspace-free. Isotopic enrichments of 13C (~11.7 atom%) and 15N (~4.3 atom%) in the CO2 and N2 pool were determined using gas chromatography coupled to isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS; Finnigan Delta Plus) and membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS;In Process Instruments GAM 200), respectively, in subsamples taken at the end of the incubation. The three isotopically enriched bottles and the one untreated bottle (for natural abundance of 13C and 15N) were all incubated for 24 h at the conditions described above. Incubations were terminated by vacuum filtration of 0.5 L each onto a 25 mm pre-combusted (460 °C, 6 h) GF/F filter (Whatman). The filters were dried (60 °C, 12 h) and stored at room temperature in the dark until further analysis. Elemental and mass spectrometric measurements, analysis, and calculations were done as described in Martínez-Pérez et al. [49].

Bulk DIP uptake rates

Bulk DIP uptake rates were determined using small polycarbonate bottles filled with 60 mL of bulk water and 150 kBq radiolabeled phosphate (33PO43− equivalent to 0.02 nmol/L final concentration, specific activity 111 TBq mmol−1, t1/2 25.4 days; Hartmann Analytic). Incubations were performed in five replicates with two (background) controls: one with filtered seawater (0.22 µm pore size) and the other heat killed (80 °C, 30 min). Both controls were used to reveal any unspecific binding of the radiotracer to the bottle, filter, or organic material. All incubations were carried out at conditions described above. Subsamples from the radiotracer incubations were taken every 6 h starting at time zero (t0) to monitor linearity of uptake. The subsamples were filtered through a polycarbonate filter (GTTP, 0.2 µm pore size, 25 mm diameter, Millipore) and washed twice with 5 mL of filtered seawater. The filter was then transferred to a 6 mL scintillation vial containing 5 mL scintillation fluid (Irga-safe plus, PerkinElmer). Total radioactivity was determined from every incubation bottle using 100 µL of water that were directly transferred into a scintillation vial. All samples from one experiment were measured on the same day using a liquid scintillation counter (type: 425-034, Hidex). Bulk DIP uptake rates were calculated using the linear regression for the radiotracer incorporation into biomass between time points (only the linear part was used, see Supplementary Fig. S2), the total amount of radiotracer added, and the DIP concentration in the water. Uptake rates were corrected for radiotracer decay, and unspecific radiotracer binding using the controls.

Cyanobacteria and epibionts characterization

Cyanobacterial colonies were hand-picked from the plankton net-collected material with the help of a stereomicroscope. Visual characterization was done by epifluorescence microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For epifluorescence microscopy of Aphanizomenon (one colony), the picked colony was preserved with formaldehyde (1% w/v final concentration) for 30 min at room temperature and rinsed with demineralized water before being transferred onto a polycarbonate filter (GTTP, 0.22 μm pore size, 25 mm diameter, Millipore). The filter was stored frozen at −20 °C until further processing. For epifluorescence microscopy of Nodularia (one colony), we used one of the filters from the single-colony incubations (see below). Both colonies were microscopically identified on the filters by their auto-fluorescence signal and the colony-associated microorganisms were visualized by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining using an epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioplan2 and Axio Imager M2).

The SEM analysis was used to determine the number of epibionts per cyanobacterial cell, only considering cells closely associated to the cyanobacteria (also see single-cell section below). The SEM-based epibiont counting was done on the filters obtained from the single-cell incubations (8th August) described below. In random selection, a total of 24 and 8 images containing 32 and 18 cyanobacterial cells and 64 and 251 epibionts were counted for Aphanizomenon and Nodularia (one colony each), respectively.

The elemental composition of the cyanobacteria was measured using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) coupled to the SEM (SEM-EDS). For each Aphanizomenon and Nodularia, one colony was sampled at the start of the incubation (t0; only for 8th August), and one of the three colonies incubated for single-cell measurements (t24) was also used for elemental analysis (see Supplementary Fig. S1; details of analysis and data published in Schoffelen et al. [46]). The penetration depth of this SEM-EDS analysis was ~2 µm, which assures that the obtained signal from the cyanobacteria has minimal interference from the polycarbonate filter [46]. However, the epibionts are much smaller than the cyanobacteria themselves. Therefore, we analyzed the elemental composition (using SEM-EDS) of the epibionts (8 Aug 2018) on colonies that were picked and transferred to silica wafers to avoid interference. These colonies were fixed with formaldehyde (1% w/v final concentration) for 30 min at room temperature, washed with demineralized water, and then transferred to the silica wafers. The wafers were stored frozen at −20 °C until further analysis. From one colony of each Aphanizomenon and Nodularia, 21 and 33 epibionts across 7 and 7 randomly selected fields of view were analyzed, respectively. No significant differences (p > 0.05) in the elemental ratios were detected between epibionts of Aphanizomenon and Nodularia based on a Mann–Whitney test (for non-normal distributions) and all epibiont data was therefore combined.

Single-cell C and N uptake rates

Cyanobacteria CO2 and N2 fixation and epibiont C and N uptake rates were determined using a stable isotope approach followed by nanometer-scale secondary ion mass spectroscopy (nanoSIMS). The batches of incubation seawater were prepared by adding NaH13CO3 and 15N2 to a 2.5-L polycarbonate-filled bottle and capped headspace-free as described above but with filtered seawater (0.2 μm pore size). The bottle was agitated for 15 min on a rotary shaker and the gas bubble was released. The isotope-labeled water was carefully transferred to 6-mL Exetainers. Single hand-picked cyanobacterial colonies were then added to the Exetainers, the radiotracer 33P was added (see [46]), the Exetainers were closed headspace-free, and were incubated under the conditions described above. Isotopic enrichments of 13C and 15N in the CO2 and N2 pool were measured as described above from subsamples of the batches of prepared incubation water (average across experiments of ~11.9 atom% 13C, ~1.8 atom% 15N were used in the calculation). Per species a single sample (i.e., a single colony) was terminated at t0 (only 8th August; used for SEM-EDS analysis of cyanobacteria; see [46]) and three samples (i.e., three colonies) after 24 h by fixing the sample with formaldehyde (1% w/v final concentration) for 30 min at room temperature and then filtering onto a gold-sputtered polycarbonate filter (0.22 μm pore size; 25 mm diameter; Millipore). Filters were washed with nanopure water, dried at room temperature, and mounted onto microscope glass slides using a small drop of 0.1% low-melting-point agarose. The microscope slides were stored in the dark at room temperature before single-cell analysis. One of the three colonies sampled after 24 h was later used in the elemental analysis and the other two colonies were reserved for nanoSIMS analysis of the cyanobacteria. NanoSIMS measurements of the epibionts were done on one colony for Nodularia and on up to three colonies for Aphanizomenon, since here the SEM-EDS filter was also used for nanoSIMS analysis (Supplementary Fig. S1).

nanoSIMS analysis

Single-cell C and N uptake activity rates were determined based on the incorporation of DI13C and 15N2 into the cyanobacteria cell biomass and the uptake of released 13C and 15N compounds by the epibionts using a nanoSIMS 50 L (CAMECA) at the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Bremen, Germany. The analysis of the cyanobacterial cells is described in detail in Schoffelen et al. [46]; the following paragraph therefore describes the analysis of the epibionts. Aphanizomenon and Nodularia filaments were identified based on autofluorescence and morphology and were marked using a laser micro-dissection system (6000B, Leica). Since Aphanizomenon filaments have a sparse epibiotic colonization, most of the individual epibionts were later identified by their nanoSIMS signals (e.g., 12C14N or 32S) while some were additionally imaged prior to nanoSIMS using SEM. However, many microorganisms associated to Nodularia were embedded in the colonies’ mucilage (forming multiple layers; Supplementary Fig. S3), which made it difficult to identify them in the SEM and/or nanoSIMS images. We therefore mainly focused on the epibionts in single to double layers around the filaments and epibionts of Nodularia were visualized with SEM prior to nanoSIMS analysis so that measurements could be attributed to individual cells.

After loading the sample into the nanoSIMS, marked filaments were pre-sputtered with a Cs+ primary ion beam of 300 pA to remove surface contaminations, implement Cs+ ions into the samples, and achieve a stable secondary ion emission rate. A primary Cs+ ion beam with a current between 1 and 1.5 pA and a beam diameter <100 nm was rastered across the cells for analysis. For individual cells, secondary ion images of 12C, 13C, 12C14N, 12C15N, 31P, and 32S were simultaneously recorded using six electron multipliers. The analysis areas were 15 μm × 15 μm in size. An image size of 256 × 256 pixels with a dwell time of 1 ms per pixel was used for the imaging and a minimum of 40 planes were measured per area. To minimize interferences for 12C15N the instrument was tuned for high mass resolution (>8000 MRP). All nanoSIMS measurements were analyzed using the Matlab-based software package Look@NanoSims [50] (available at http://nanosims.geo.uu.nl/nanosimswiki/doku.php/nanosims:lans). For every measurement, secondary ion images were drift corrected and accumulated. Regions of interest were drawn around cells using the secondary ion images, and 13C/12C, 15N/14N (inferred from 12C15N/12C14N), and 32S/12C ratios were calculated. Detection limits for the 13C/12C and 15N/14N ratios were 0.0117 and 0.0043, respectively (for 13C/12C also see [46]). The nanoSIMS images were correlated with previously recorded SEM images showing the epibionts along the cyanobacterial filaments.

The relative C and N uptake activity of the epibionts was calculated based on the incorporation of 13C and 15N into the biomass (originating from DI13C or 15N2), natural abundance of 13C and 15N from the bulk biomass (see bulk CO2 and N2 fixation section), and the DI13C or 15N2 labeling in the incubation water. Cellular rates of the epibionts were based on a “prolate spheroid” biovolume calculation [51] and a biovolume to cellular C conversion factor [52]. Cellular N content was calculated using the C:N ratio determined from SEM-EDS analysis as described above. Uptake rates might be slightly underestimated due to sample preparation for nanoSIMS analysis [53].

C-based and N-based growth rates

Substrate-based growth rates for epibionts and cyanobacteria were determined based on the incorporation of DI13C or 15N2 into the biomass (XB; corrected for natural abundance) assuming an even distribution of isotopes between cells during cell division as follows:

Substrate-basedgrowthrateday-1=XBXI×2×1t, 1

with XI (corrected for natural abundance) representing the DI13C or 15N2 atom% labeling and t the incubation time. A Mann–Whitney test (for non-normally distributed data) was used to determine significant differences in C-based and N-based growth rates between incubation conditions (in situ or DIP amended) including all measured cells.

Partitioning of fixed C and N between cyanobacteria and epibionts

In our experiments, we currently cannot mass balance fixed C and N budgets, which would require not only the measurement of fixed C and N lost to the medium but also the monitoring of total biomass of both cyanobacteria and epibionts throughout the incubation. This in itself is difficult given the heterogeneity of the epibiotic coverage of Nodularia and methodological complexity. To estimate how the fixed C and N is partitioned between the cyanobacterial cells and their epibionts, we therefore used the median number of epibionts per cyanobacterial cell and the median cellular rates assuming median cell sizes and C:N ratios calculated from all cells of both treatments. Since the relative and cellular rates are based on the isotopic labeling of the substrate, that is, CO2 and N2, the calculation of transfer of fixed C and N from cyanobacteria to epibionts assumes that the epibionts only receive newly fixed diazotroph-derived C and N. The contribution of epibionts to the total assimilation of C and N among the cyanobacteria and epibionts was calculated as follows:

EpibiontsCassimilationofthetotal%=EC×EnEC×En+CC×100, 2
EpibiontsCassimilationofthetotal%=EN×EnEN×En+CN×100, 3

in which CC and CN represent the median C and N assimilation by the cyanobacterial cells, EC and EN represent the median C and N assimilation by the epibionts, which is multiplied by the number of epibionts attached per cyanobacterial cell (En). Since it is possible that not only freshly fixed material was released/transferred, we also calculated the transfer assuming that the substrate for the epibionts was a mixture of freshly fixed material and “older biomass,” using the same equations. For this, we assumed that the released C and N from the cyanobacteria, that is, substrate for the epibionts, had an isotopic composition that was equal to the isotopic composition of the cyanobacterial biomass at the end of the incubation.

Results

Environmental conditions, bulk CO2 and N2 fixation, and DIP uptake during the cyanobacterial summer bloom

The environmental conditions of the cyanobacterial bloom were published in Schoffelen et al. [46], but are described here again for better reference and context. Nutrient concentrations monitored throughout 2015 at sampling station B1 showed that DIN was largely depleted by the beginning of May and remained low throughout August (Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute database for monitoring station B1). At the onset of the N2-fixing cyanobacterial bloom in August (bulk CO2 fixation: 15.5 ± 1.2 µmol C L−1 day−1; bulk N2 fixation: 1.23 ± 0.07 µmol N L−1 day−1), DIP concentrations dropped from ~150 to only ~30 nmol L−1 over the course of 2 days and stayed low for the duration of the bloom. Water conditions were generally calm, surface water temperatures (1–2 m depth) were between 17.4 and 18.0 °C, and sunlight irradiance was high at ~280 μmol photons m−2 s−1 during the summer bloom. With respect to the filamentous cyanobacterial diazotrophs, Aphanizomenon sp. was most abundant followed by Dolichospermum sp. and Nodularia sp. [46], which is consistent with previous findings [23].

During the cyanobacterial bloom, DIP uptake rates in the bulk seawater were uniform at 2.1–2.4 nmol L−1 h−1 during the first 6 h of incubation independent of the initial DIP concentrations of 154, 34, and 23 nmol L−1 on 6, 8, and 12th August 2015, respectively (Fig. 1). However, phosphate uptake halted when DIP concentrations dropped below ~10 nmol L−1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2), indicating that the bulk microbial community starts experiencing DIP limitation below this concentration. The filamentous cyanobacterial colonies, however, already experienced DIP stress at higher DIP concentrations with an apparent KM of ~60 nmol L−1 [46].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) uptake rates by bulk seawater at different DIP concentrations measured between 6th and 12th August 2015. Symbols and error bars indicate means and standard deviations of five replicate incubations

Epibiont visualization, abundance, and elemental composition

Microscopic characterization of picked cyanobacterial colonies (stained with DAPI) revealed mostly non-autofluorescent bacteria associated with filaments of both Aphanizomenon and Nodularia (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. S3). Associated cells occurred primarily as individual cells or occasionally as small clusters of 2–5 cells along Aphanizomenon filaments. In contrast, Nodularia filaments were densely populated, with large cell clusters often forming a multi-layer biofilm within the mucilage along the filament. Due to this mucilage in the multi-layer biofilm, epibionts were indistinguishable from each other and the organic-rich mucus under SEM and/or nanoSIMS. Therefore, we focused mainly on single-layer or double-layer epibiont biofilms closely associated to the filaments (see Methods section). Associated epibiotic cells had an average size of 0.84 ± 0.11 µm3 (median ± SE). The abundance of epibionts was highly variable with median abundances of 2 (mean ± SD of 2.3 ± 1.7; n = 24 fields of view) and 20 (mean ± SD of 35.4 ± 35.1; n = 8 fields of view) epibionts per cyanobacterial cell for Aphanizomenon and Nodularia, respectively. Since we only considered closely associated cells on Nodularia filaments, our estimate is conservative and the true number of epibionts is likely much higher considering the dense colonization in the mucilage (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. S3). Elemental analysis of the epibionts showed C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios slightly below the canonical Redfield ratio (Fig. 3), while the filamentous cyanobacteria had higher elemental ratios (C:P ~130:1 [46]).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Microscopic images of Aphanizomenon (a, b) and Nodularia (c, d) filaments showing their epibiotic colonization using epifluorescence of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained cells (a, c) and autofluorescence (b, d). Scale bars are 10 μm

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Elemental composition of epibionts (n = 54; no significant difference between Aphanizomenon-associated (n = 21) and Nodularia -associated (n = 33) epibionts; Mann–Whitney, p values C:N = 0.10, C:P = 0.43, N:P = 0.80) as determined by SEM-EDS. Dashed lines indicate the canonical Redfield ratio

Single-cell C and N uptake by cyanobacterial filaments and their epibionts

Cyanobacterial filaments were highly enriched in 13C and 15N showing their active 13CO2 and 15N2 fixation during the 24-h incubations (Fig. 4; [46]). Epibionts of Aphanizomenon showed low enrichments in both isotopes indicating a low transfer of freshly fixed material from Aphanizomenon to its epibionts. Relative activities of epibionts were calculated from the enrichments assuming that the transfer of freshly fixed material is the only source of C and N for the epibionts. C-based and N-based relative activities (see Methods section) of the Aphanizomenon-associated cells were low at 0.03 ± 0.04 (median ± SD) and 0.03 ± 0.03 (median ± SD) under in situ conditions, respectively (Fig. 5). The transfer of freshly fixed material to the epibionts remained low at 0.03 ± 0.06 and 0.07 ± 0.07 (median  ± SD) for C-based and N-based activity, respectively, when DIP was added to concentrations of ~1 µmol L−1 with no significant difference for C (p = 0.66) and a significant difference for N (p < 0.001), respectively (Fig. 5). Epibionts of Nodularia showed higher enrichments in both isotopes, demonstrating a substantial transfer of freshly fixed material (Figs. 4 and 5). Under in situ conditions, the C-based and N-based relative activity of the epibionts was 0.08 ± 0.05 (median ± SD) and 0.08 ± 0.03 (median ± SD), respectively. However, when DIP was added to concentrations ~1 µmol L−1, the relative activities of the epibionts dropped significantly (p < 0.001 for both C and N) to 0.05 ± 0.02 (median ± SD) and 0.05 ± 0.01 (median ± SD) for C and N, respectively. This drop in the relative activities indicates that less freshly fixed C and N was transferred from Nodularia to its epibionts.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Single-cell imaging of Aphanizomenon and Nodularia filaments and their epibionts. Single epibionts were identified using either nanometer-scale secondary ion mass spectroscopy (nanoSIMS) (Aphanizomenon only) or scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Nodularia and Aphanizomenon) and their C and N uptake was subsequently measured using nanoSIMS. C and N uptake are shown as 13C/12C and 15/14N ratios. Cellular sulfur distribution is shown as the 32S/12C ratio which also clearly showed the epibionts. Outlines indicate measured cyanobacterial cells and epibionts. NA = natural abundance. NanoSIMS scale bars are 2 μm. NanoSIMS images are superimposed on a black background box to adjust the image orientation relative to the SEM images

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Single-cell C-based and N-based activities and growth rates of Aphanizomenon (a, c, e) and Nodularia (b, d, f) and their epibionts. a, b Cyanobacterial (triangles) and epibiotic (circles) relative activities under in situ (white) and added dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) (+1 µM) conditions (gray), respectively. cf Growth rates of the cyanobacteria and epibionts for both in situ (white) and added DIP (+1 µM; gray) conditions (lines = medians, boxes = 25th and 75th percentiles, bars = standard deviation, black circles = outliers). In Aphanizomenon colonies incubated under in situ conditions, of a total of 153 measured epibionts across 25 fields of view, 111 and 41 cells had 13C/12C and 15N/14N ratios, respectively, above detection limit. In the +DIP condition, from a total of 18 measured epibionts across 10 fields of view, 15 and 15 epibionts had 13C/12C and 15N/14N ratios, respectively, above detection limit. In Nodularia colonies incubated under in situ conditions, of a total of 253 measured epibionts across eight fields of view, 238 and 205 epibionts had 13C/12C and 15N/14N ratios, respectively, above detection limit. In the +DIP condition, from a total of 104 measured epibionts across five fields of view, 104 and 86 epibionts had 13C/12C and 15N/14N ratios, respectively, above detection limit

To compare the relative activities of the epibionts with the growth rates of the cyanobacteria, the relative activities were translated to C-based and N-based growth rates. The C-based growth rate of Aphanizomenon decreased from 0.51 to 0.38 day−1 (p < 0.001) [46], while the N-based growth rate increased from 0.22 to 0.29 day−1 (p < 0.001) when DIP was added. The C-based growth rate of its epibionts did not change significantly (p = 0.66) while the N-based growth rate increased significantly (p < 0.001) (Fig. 5). The response of Nodularia and its epibionts, however, was very distinct. Nodularia grew significantly faster with added DIP (both C-based and N-based; p < 0.001) than under in situ conditions [46]. At the same time, the epibionts’ growth rates declined significantly (both C-based and N-based; p < 0.001) (Fig. 5).

Discussion

Blooms of filamentous diazotrophic cyanobacteria develop annually during summer in the Baltic Sea. While several parameters contribute to the bloom development, they tend to be largely fueled by an excess of DIP in stratified surface waters low in DIN [54]. At the time of our field experiments in 2015, a typical cyanobacterial bloom was developing in early August when DIP concentrations were still around 150 nmol L−1. Within a 2-day time window, the DIP concentration decreased to about 20–30 nmol L−1 and remained low throughout the bloom. Despite these low DIP concentrations, the majority of the microbial community was still able to obtain sufficient P for growth as indicated by the unchanged DIP uptake rate of the bulk seawater. Our incubations showed that DIP limitation in the bulk community is likely to set in only at concentrations below ~10 nmol L−1. This is consistent with estimated KM values for bacterial/microbial DIP uptake at concentrations of <20 nmol DIP L−1 [5557]. Previous studies also observed that most of the DIP uptake is carried out by the picoplankton community, which appear to outcompete larger organisms at low DIP concentrations (usually <10 µm size fraction; e.g., [5764]). Fittingly, the cyanobacterial colonies in the bloom experienced acute DIP stress as DIP concentrations were well below their apparent KM [46]. It has to be kept in mind, though, that cyanobacterial colonies can entrap other organisms and have epibiotic communities distinct from the surrounding seawater [42, 43, 65]. While the apparent KM value does not distinguish between the different members of the colonies, the elemental ratios of individual cells within a colony can reveal potentially low cellular P content, presumably the result of P stress. The single-cell C:P and N:P ratios of the cyanobacterial filaments showed high elemental ratios (C:P ~130:1 with an increase to ~170:1 within 24 h; [46]) in agreement with the scarcity of DIP. This is in stark contrast to the epibiotic communities. Epibionts of both Aphanizomenon and Nodularia had elemental ratios slightly below the canonical Redfield ratio (Fig. 3), suggesting that the epibionts were not experiencing P stress at that time.

In the absence of P stress in the epibiotic community, their growth is likely driven by the availability of N and organic C as most of the cells were likely heterotrophic (i.e., absence of autofluorescence). An obvious source of both N and organic C are the cyanobacterial filaments themselves, which have been shown to release inorganic and organic material [5, 6, 9, 29, 40, 44]. In fact, the release of fixed N2 as ammonium has previously been shown for both Aphanizomenon [40] and Nodularia [29]. Although those studies were also carried out in summer, it is unclear if the reported ammonium release was related to the DIP availability since DIP concentrations were not measured.

The epibionts are among the organisms most likely to consume both inorganic/organic C and N that was released due to their proximity to the source that is within the diffusive boundary layer for the epibionts [29, 40]. Any uptake of released C or N by epibionts should therefore relate to the release of freshly fixed material originating from CO2 and N2 fixation by the cyanobacterial filaments. Although in our measurements we cannot distinguish other potential autotrophic microorganisms from heterotrophs among the epibionts, the microscopic imaging suggests that the vast majority of the epibionts lacked autofluorescence. Our estimate of uptake of fixed C released by the cyanobacteria should therefore be little biased by other autotrophs. Similarly, we cannot exclude that an epibiont may have been an N2-fixing microorganism. However, Farnelid and co-authors [66] found that only ~0.7% of nifH sequences recovered from size-fractionated biomass >10 µm in surface waters of the Baltic Sea were associated to non-cyanobacterial sequences, indicating that other diazotrophs do not play a substantial role in N2 fixation within the colonies. Further, ammonium inside colonies can reach high concentrations [40] that would likely inhibit other diazotrophs in active N2 fixation.

Our single-cell analyses using nanoSIMS showed that epibionts of Aphanizomenon consumed less released C and N than epibionts of Nodularia did, despite both cyanobacteria experiencing DIP stress [46]. We recently found that Nodularia and Aphanizomenon used different P sources for growth under DIP scarcity during this bloom [46]. Although Nodularia is in principle capable of accessing ester-bound organic phosphate and phosphonates via (alkaline) phosphatases and a CP-lyase, respectively [67, 68], they did not use organic P under DIP scarcity in the Baltic Sea during the 2015 summer bloom [46]. In contrast, Aphanizomenon, also capable of using organic P via alkaline phosphatases [69], exploited organic P sources to counteract the DIP scarcity [46]. Our observation that Nodularia transferred substantially more C and N to epibionts than Aphanizomenon could therefore be the direct result of the dependence of growth on DIP and Aphanizomenon’s use of organic P. To test this hypothesis, we incubated the field-collected cyanobacterial colonies (including their epibionts) with additional DIP, enough to alleviate the DIP stress. With plenty of DIP available, Aphanizomenon’s C-based and N-based growth rates decreased and increased slightly, respectively (Fig. 5; [46]). At the same time, the transfer of C from Aphanizomenon to its epibionts remained similar while the transfer of N increased slightly (Fig. 5). However, based on the relatively low activity by the epibionts (Figs. 4 and 5), it is unlikely that Aphanizomenon released a large amount of fixed C and/or N under both in situ and increased DIP concentrations. These results support the idea that Aphanizomenon used organic P to combat DIP scarcity and thereby prevented the release of larger amounts of fixed C and N. Nodularia’s response to increased DIP concentrations was very different, with cells growing significantly faster with added DIP than under DIP scarcity (Fig. 5). Interestingly, at the same time the transfer of fixed C and N to the epibionts significantly decreased with added DIP, indicating that the fixed C and N was used for growth of Nodularia rather than being released into the colony. The combined results indicate that the availability of DIP can have a direct effect on the transfer of diazotrophically fixed N2 to epibionts, but that this is likely dependent on the prevailing N2-fixing species and its specific dependence on DIP for growth.

To assess the potential ecological significance, we calculated the partitioning of fixed CO2 and N2 between cyanobacteria and epibionts as a function of their growth rate. The resulting transfer rates are presented as a percentage (median ± SE) of the total amount of fixed CO2 and N2 (i.e., the sum of fixed C and N retained in a cyanobacterial cell and fixed C and N transferred to its epibionts) and should thus not be deemed as exact amounts.

In Aphanizomenon, <1% of the fixed C and N was transferred from cyanobacterial cells to their epibionts, suggesting that the transfer of fixed C and N and the overall release was very little (Fig. 6). This small percentage was not only due to the low number of epibionts but also the lower uptake per cell (Supplementary Fig. S4). The total transfer increased only slightly (still ≤1% for C and N) when more DIP was added, suggesting that, at least at the time of our sampling, the use of organic P by Aphanizomenon likely prevented the release and transfer of fixed material. In contrast to Aphanizomenon, the amount of fixed C and N taken up by epibionts of Nodularia was 8 ± 5% and 14 ± 9% of the total amount fixed per cyanobacterial cell, respectively (Fig. 6). However, when DIP was added, this transfer dropped to 3 ± 2% and 6 ± 4% of the total fixed C and N, respectively. These estimates of transfer are conservative, and the total transfer (and release) was likely higher for two reasons. First, we determined only the transfer of freshly fixed C and N. The release and transfer rates would have been higher if a mixture of older material and freshly fixed C and N was released. We calculated the transfer rates of fixed C and N assuming that the released material had an isotopic composition equal to the median enrichment of the cyanobacterial cells at the end of the incubation, that is, the substrate for epibionts had the isotopic composition of the cyanobacterial biomass. Under in situ conditions, the transfer of fixed C and N from Aphanizomenon to its epibionts would then still be <1% and 3 ± 1% of total C and N fixed, respectively. For Nodularia, however, the transfer would increase to 35 ± 24% and 51 ± 36% for C and N, respectively, under in situ conditions. Second, we only analyzed the closely associated microorganisms in the single or double layers. It is conceivable that not only these epibionts consumed released C and N but also the other colony-associated microorganisms. Considering the extensive microbial population in the mucilage of Nodularia (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S3), the transfer might be several fold higher than what was recovered in epibionts directly attached to the filaments. In summary, our data clearly shows that the availability of DIP can directly affect the release and transfer of freshly fixed C and N in filamentous diazotrophic cyanobacteria, likely to an ecologically significant extent.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

CO2 and N2 fixation by cyanobacteria and C and N uptake by epibionts as a percentage of the total uptake by the colony (i.e., fixed C and N recovered in the cyanobacteria and their epibionts) under in situ (dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP)-limited) and added DIP (+1 µM; DIP-replete) conditions. Arrows indicate pathways of fixation and release of N2 (solid arrows) and CO2 (dashed arrows). Most of the fixed C and N is retained in the cyanobacterial biomass, but a portion of the fixed material is either actively or passively released and is assimilated by the epibionts. Dark green: heterocysts; light green: vegetative cells; light magenta: epibionts. Only major fluxes are plotted, fluxes below 1% are not included here. Please note here that the partitioning was calculated with cellular rates for cells of median size and C:N ratios across both treatments (see Methods and Results section)

The pathway of release/transfer in our experiments is yet unknown. Since the colonies were hand-picked for the incubations, side effects of grazing were likely little. The faster growth response by Nodularia and the nearly unchanged growth by Aphanizomenon to DIP additions suggests that cell death or viral lysis were unlikely to have caused the release under DIP limitation since both would have probably resulted in the release of DIP/organic P alleviating DIP limitation as well. Moreover, both diazotrophs still showed substantial C-based and N-based growth under DIP scarcity. Our results indicate that the use of distinct P sources by Aphanizomenon and Nodularia were likely responsible for the observed differences in release. This difference fits to the observed denser colonization of Nodularia, which is progressively overgrown by bacteria and other organisms during a bloom [42, 44, 45]. The released C and N likely provided an excellent substrate and matrix for bacterial colonization. It is unclear whether the release of fixed C and N was from leakage or active excretion. Leakage could have resulted from, for example, photosynthetic overflow under nutrient limitation as has been postulated for DOC release [34]. The colonization of filaments by epibionts could therefore be relatively one sided, with epibionts taking advantage of the fixed C and N released due to P stress [70]. On the other hand, colony-forming cyanobacteria such as Aphanizomenon and Nodularia often harbor diverse communities or epibionts, which are distinct from the bacterioplankton in the surrounding seawater [42, 43]. For the oceanic filamentous cyanobacterium Trichodesmium, it has been suggested that the epibiotic community could facilitate the uptake of both Fe and P by Trichodesmium through the production and activity of siderophores and alkaline phosphatases [71, 72]. The release of fixed C and N by the cyanobacteria could therefore be a mechanism to attract microorganisms with “food” and eventually benefit from or trigger distinct metabolic activities [18]. With more DIP available, these metabolic activities may no longer be required and transfer decreases. How tightly regulated these interactions are is not quite understood, but experiments on quorum sensing suggest that the activity of the cyanobacteria might be more than just the sum of abiotic factors but rather “a complex interplay of biotic and environmental factors” [73]. The overall capacity of the cyanobacteria to scavenge P might therefore not entirely depend on its own metabolic capacity but also on that of its associated microorganisms or microbiome. The release of fixed C and/or N likely creates a unique microbiome that is based on element cycling [74]. In Nodularia colonies, the composition of the microbiome is a dynamic feature throughout the seasons [44, 45] that is possibly linked to the degree of P limitation. Organisms inhabiting oligotrophic environments with continuous nutrient limitation, such as Trichodesmium, may harbor a more perpetual microbiome that is tailored to its environment [72].

The capacity of DIP availability to directly affect the release of freshly fixed C and N likely has an impact on how both elements are recycled and/or exported. In contrast to C and N that remains in autotrophic biomass, C and N that is released and processed either by associated microorganisms or bacterioplankton are passed on to different/higher trophic levels with the inherent loss of some of the fixed C as CO2. The same is true for epibionts that are grazed upon within colonies [45]. Further, the overgrowth of colonies can change the weight and/or density of colonies [44] and could promote the sinking out of surface waters, directly exporting C and N. Whether the phenomenon observed here could also be found in other areas of the marine environments is unclear. If this is indeed the case, then the availability of DIP to diazotrophs could present a mechanism directly affecting the cycling and/or export of diazotrophically fixed N2 in the ocean, and therefore the turnover and productivity of oceanic surface waters.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure S1 (986.2KB, jpg)
Supplementary Figure S4 (936.6KB, tif)

Acknowledgements

We thank Daniela Tienken, Osmund Darril Rebello, Gabriele Klockgether, and Miriam Philippi for sampling, technical, and imaging assistance. This study was supported by the Max Planck Society and the Askö Laboratory (Baltic Sea Center; through travel grants and provision of accommodation, lab space, and sampling equipment).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (10.1038/s41396-019-0453-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  • 1.Berman-Frank I, Rosenberg G, Levitan O, Haramaty L, Mari X. Coupling between autocatalytic cell death and transparent exopolymeric particle production in the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:1415–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hewson I, Govil SR, Capone DG, Carpenter EJ, Fuhrman JA. Evidence of Trichodesmium viral lysis and potential significance for biogeochemical cycling in the oligotrophic ocean. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2004;36:1–8. doi: 10.3354/ame036001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cairns J, Coloma S, Sivonen K, Hiltunen T. Evolving interactions between diazotrophic cyanobacterium and phage mediate nitrogen release and host competitive ability. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3:160839. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bronk DA, Glibert PM. Contrasting patterns of dissolved organic nitrogen release by two size fractions of estuarine plankton during a period of rapid NH4+ consumption and NO2- production. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 1993;96:291–9. doi: 10.3354/meps096291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glibert PM, Bronk DA. Release of dissolved organic nitrogen by marine diazotrophic cyanobacteria, Trichodesmium spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:3996–4000. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.11.3996-4000.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bonnet S, Berthelot H, Turk-Kubo K, Cornet-Barthaux V, Fawcett S, Berman-Frank I, et al. Diazotroph derived nitrogen supports diatom growth in the South West Pacific: a quantitative study using nanoSIMS. Limnol Oceanogr. 2016;61:1549–62. doi: 10.1002/lno.10300. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ohlendieck U, Stuhr A, Siegmund H. Nitrogen fixation by diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea and transfer of the newly fixed nitrogen to picoplankton organisms. J Mar Syst. 2000;25:213–9. doi: 10.1016/S0924-7963(00)00016-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Paerl HW. Transfer of N2 and CO2 fixation products from Anabaena oscillarioides to associated bacteria during inorganic carbon sufficiency and deficiency. J Phycol. 1984;20:600–8. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1984.00600.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adam B, Klawonn I, Svedén JB, Bergkvist J, Nahar N, Walve J, et al. N2-fixation, ammonium release and N-transfer to the microbial and classical food web within a plankton community. ISME J. 2016;10:450. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eichner MJ, Klawonn I, Wilson ST, Littmann S, Whitehouse MJ, Church MJ, et al. Chemical microenvironments and single-cell carbon and nitrogen uptake in field-collected colonies of Trichodesmium under different pCO2. ISME J. 2017;11:1305. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.O’Neil JM, Roman MR. Ingestion of the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium spp. by pelagic harpacticoid copepods Macrosetella, Miracia and Oculosetella. Hydrobiologia. 1994;292:235–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00229946. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wannicke N, Korth F, Liskow I, Voss M. Incorporation of diazotrophic fixed N2 by mesozooplankton—case studies in the southern Baltic Sea. J Mar Syst. 2013;117-118:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2013.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hogfors H, Motwani NH, Hajdu S, El-Shehawy R, Holmborn T, Vehmaa A, et al. Bloom-forming cyanobacteria support copepod reproduction and development in the Baltic Sea. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e112692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karlson AML, Duberg J, Motwani NH, Hogfors H, Klawonn I, Ploug H, et al. Nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria stimulates production in Baltic food webs. Ambio. 2015;44(Suppl 3):413–26. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0660-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hunt BPV, Bonnet S, Berthelot H, Conroy BJ, Foster RA, Pagano M. Contribution and pathways of diazotroph-derived nitrogen to zooplankton during the VAHINE mesocosm experiment in the oligotrophic New Caledonia lagoon. Biogeosciences. 2016;13:3131–45. doi: 10.5194/bg-13-3131-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Karl DM, Church MJ, Dore JE, Letelier RM, Mahaffey C. Predictable and efficient carbon sequestration in the North Pacific Ocean supported by symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:1842–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120312109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mulholland MR. The fate of nitrogen fixed by diazotrophs in the ocean. Biogeosciences. 2007;4:37–51. doi: 10.5194/bg-4-37-2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ploug H. Cyanobacterial surface blooms formed by Aphanizomenon sp. and Nodularia spumigena in the Baltic Sea: small-scale fluxes, pH, and oxygen microenvironments. Limnol Oceanogr. 2008;53:914–21. doi: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.0914. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Capone DG, Zehr JP, Paerl HW, Bergman B, Carpenter EJ. Trichodesmium, a globally significant marine cyanobacterium. Science. 1997;276:1221–9. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mahaffey C, Michaels AF, Capone DG. The conundrum of marine N2 fixation. Am J Sci. 2005;305:546–95. doi: 10.2475/ajs.305.6-8.546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.LaRoche J, Breitbarth E. Importance of the diazotrophs as a source of new nitrogen in the ocean. J Sea Res. 2005;53:67–91. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2004.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Larsson U, Hajdu S, Walve J, Elmgren R. Baltic Sea nitrogen fixation estimated from the summer increase in upper mixed layer total nitrogen. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001;46:811–20. doi: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.4.0811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Klawonn I, Nahar N, Walve J, Andersson B, Olofsson M, Svedén JB, et al. Cell-specific nitrogen- and carbon-fixation of cyanobacteria in a temperate marine system (Baltic Sea) Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:4596–609. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Howarth RW, Marino R, Lane J, Cole JJ. Nitrogen fixation in freshwater, estuarine, and marine ecosystems. 1. Rates and importance. Limnol and Oceanogr. 1988;33(4, Part 2):669–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tallberg P, Heiskanen A-S. Species-specific phytoplankton sedimentation in relation to primary production along an inshore—offshore gradient in the Baltic Sea. J Plankton Res. 1998;20:2053–70. doi: 10.1093/plankt/20.11.2053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rolff C. Seasonal variation in δ13C and δ15N of size-fractionated plankton at a coastal station in the northern Baltic proper. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2000;203:47–65. doi: 10.3354/meps203047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sellner KG. Physiology, ecology, and toxic properties of marine cyanobacteria blooms. Limnol Oceanogr. 1997;42(5 part 2):1089–104. doi: 10.4319/lo.1997.42.5_part_2.1089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Caffin M, Moutin T, Foster RA, Bouruet-Aubertot P, Doglioli AM, Berthelot H, et al. N2 fixation as a dominant new N source in the western tropical South Pacific Ocean (OUTPACE cruise) Biogeosciences. 2017;15:2565–85. doi: 10.5194/bg-15-2565-2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ploug H, Adam B, Musat N, Kalvelage T, Lavik G, Wolf-Gladrow D, et al. Carbon, nitrogen and O2 fluxes associated with the cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena in the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2011;5:1549. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Benavides M, Bronk DA, Agawin NS, Pérez‐Hernández MD, Hernández‐Guerra A, Arístegui J. Longitudinal variability of size‐fractionated N2 fixation and DON release rates along 24.5° N in the subtropical North Atlantic. J Geophys Res. 2013;118:3406–15. doi: 10.1002/jgrc.20253. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Benavides M, Agawin NS, Arístegui J, Peene J, Stal LJ. Dissolved organic nitrogen and carbon release by a marine unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacterium. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2013;69:69–80. doi: 10.3354/ame01621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Berthelot H, Bonnet S, Camps M, Grosso O, Moutin T. Assessment of the dinitrogen released as ammonium and dissolved organic nitrogen by unicellular and filamentous marine diazotrophic cyanobacteria grown in culture. Front Mar Sci. 2015;2:80. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2015.00080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Agawin NS, Rabouille S, Veldhuis MJ, Servatius L, Hol S, van Overzee HM, et al. Competition and facilitation between unicellular nitrogen‐fixing cyanobacteria and non-nitrogen‐fixing phytoplankton species. Limnol Oceanogr. 2007;52:2233–48. doi: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.5.2233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thornton DC. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) release by phytoplankton in the contemporary and future ocean. Eur J Phycol. 2014;49:20–46. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2013.875596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Myklestad SM. Release of extracellular products by phytoplankton with special emphasis on polysaccharides. Sci Total Environ. 1995;165:155–64. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04549-G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berman-Frank I, Cullen JT, Shaked Y, Sherrell RM, Falkowski PG. Iron availability, cellular iron quotas, and nitrogen fixation in Trichodesmium. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001;46:1249–60. doi: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.6.1249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sañudo-Wilhelmy SA, Kustka AB, Gobler CJ, Hutchins DA, Yang M, Lwiza K, et al. Phosphorus limitation of nitrogen fixation by Trichodesmium in the central Atlantic Ocean. Nature. 2001;411:66. doi: 10.1038/35075041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mills MM, Ridame C, Davey M, La Roche J, Geider RJ. Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. Nature. 2004;429:292. doi: 10.1038/nature02550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Karl DM, Letelier R, Hebel DV, Bird DF, Winn CD. Trichodesmium blooms and new nitrogen in the North Pacific Gyre. In: Carpenter EJ, Capone DG, Rueter JG, editors. Marine pelagic cyanobacteria: Trichodesmium and other diazotrophs. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 1992. pp. 219–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ploug H, Musat N, Adam B, Moraru CL, Lavik G, Vagner T, et al. Carbon and nitrogen fluxes associated with the cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon sp. in the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2010;4:1215–23. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Paerl HW. Specific associations of the bluegreen algae Anabaena and Aphanizomenon with bacteria in freshwater blooms. J Phycol. 1976;12:431–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tuomainen J, Hietanen S, Kuparinen J, Martikainen PJ, Servomaa K. Community structure of the bacteria associated with Nodularia sp. (Cyanobacteria) aggregates in the Baltic Sea. Microb Ecol. 2006;52:513–22. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9130-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Salomon PS, Janson S, Granéli E. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with filaments of Nodularia spumigena and their effect on the cyanobacterial growth. Harmful Algae. 2003;2:261–72. doi: 10.1016/S1568-9883(03)00045-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hoppe HG. Blue-Green algae agglomeration in surface water: a microbiotope of high bacterial activity. Kieler Meeresforschungen. 1981;5:291–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sellner K. Trophodynamics of marine cyanobacteria blooms. Marine pelagic cyanobacteria: Trichodesmium and other diazotrophs. In: Carpenter EJ, Capone DG, Rueter JG, editors. Marine pelagic cyanobacteria: Trichodesmium and other diazotrophs. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 1992. pp. 75–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schoffelen NJ, Mohr W, Ferdelman TG, Littmann S, Duerschlag J, Zubkov MV, et al. Single-cell imaging of phosphorus uptake shows that key harmful algae rely on different phosphorus sources for growth. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17182. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35310-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Klawonn I, Lavik G, Böning P, Marchant HK, Dekaezemacker J, Mohr W, et al. Simple approach for the preparation of 15-15N2-enriched water for nitrogen fixation assessments: evaluation, application and recommendations. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.Warembourg FR. Nitrogen fixation in soil and plant systems. In: Knowles K, Blackburn TH (eds). Nitrogen Isotope Techniques. San Diego, USA: Academic Press; 1993. p. 127–56.
  • 49.Martínez-Pérez C, Mohr W, Löscher CR, Dekaezemacker J, Littmann S, Yilmaz P, et al. The small unicellular diazotrophic symbiont, UCYN-A, is a key player in the marine nitrogen cycle. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16163. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 50.Polerecky L, Adam B, Milucka J, Musat N, Vagner T, Kuypers MMM. Look@NanoSIMS—a tool for the analysis of nanoSIMS data in environmental microbiology. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:1009–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sun J, Liu D. Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. J Plankton Res. 2003;25:1331–46. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbg096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Verity PG, Robertson CY, Tronzo CR, Andrews MG, Nelson JR, Sieracki ME. Relationships between cell volume and the carbon and nitrogen content of marine photosynthetic nanoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr. 1992;37:1434–46. doi: 10.4319/lo.1992.37.7.1434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Musat N, Stryhanyuk H, Bombach P, Adrian L, Audinot J-N, Richnow HH. The effect of FISH and CARD-FISH on the isotopic composition of 13C- and 15N-labeled Pseudomonas putida cells measured by nanoSIMS. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014;37:267–76. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stal LJ, Albertano P, Bergman B, von Bröckel K, Gallon JR, Hayes PK, et al. BASIC: Baltic Sea cyanobacteria. An investigation of the structure and dynamics of water blooms of cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea—responses to a changing environment. Cont Shelf Res. 2003;23:1695–714. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2003.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ikeya T, Ohki K, Takahashi M, Fujita Y. Study on phosphate uptake of the marine cyanophyte Synechococcus sp. NIBB 1071 in relation to oligotrophic environments in the open ocean. Mar Biol. 1997;129:195–202. doi: 10.1007/s002270050160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Timmermans KR, van der Wagt B, Veldhuis MJW, Maatman A, de Baar HJW. Physiological responses of three species of marine pico-phytoplankton to ammonium, phosphate, iron and light limitation. J Sea Res. 2005;53:109–20. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2004.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sohm JA, Capone DG. Phosphorus dynamics of the tropical and subtropical north Atlantic: Trichodesmium spp. versus bulk plankton. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2006;317:21–8. doi: 10.3354/meps317021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nausch M, Nausch G, Wasmund N. Phosphorus dynamics during the transition from nitrogen to phosphate limitation in the central Baltic Sea. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2004;266:15–25. doi: 10.3354/meps266015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cañellas M, Agustí S, Duarte CM. Latitudinal variability in phosphate uptake in the Central Atlantic. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2000;194:283–94. doi: 10.3354/meps194283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Donald KM, Joint I, Rees AP, Woodward EMS, Savidge G. Uptake of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus by phytoplankton along the 20°W meridian in the NE Atlantic between 57.5°N and 37°N. Deep Sea Res Part II. 2001;48:873–97. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00102-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tanaka T, Rassoulzadegan F, Thingstad TF. Orthophosphate uptake by heterotrophic bacteria, cyanobacteria, and autotrophic nanoflagellates in Villefranche Bay, northwestern Mediterranean: vertical, seasonal, and short-term variations of the competitive relationship for phosphorus. Limnol Oceanogr. 2004;49:1063–72. doi: 10.4319/lo.2004.49.4.1063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Thingstad TF, Skjoldal EF, Bohne RA. Phosphorus cycling and algal-bacterial competition in Sandsfjord, western Norway. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 1993;99:239–59. doi: 10.3354/meps099239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zubkov MV, Mary I, Woodward EMS, Warwick PE, Fuchs BM, Scanlan DJ, et al. Microbial control of phosphate in the nutrient-depleted North Atlantic subtropical gyre. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:2079–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Casey JR, Lomas MW, Michelou VK, Dyhrman ST, Orchard ED, Ammerman JW, et al. Phytoplankton taxon-specific orthophosphate (Pi) and ATP utilization in the western subtropical North Atlantic. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2009;58:31–44. doi: 10.3354/ame01348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stoecker D, Autio R, Rintala JM, Kuosa H. Ecto-cellular enzyme activity associated with filamentous cyanobacteria. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2005;40:151–61. doi: 10.3354/ame040151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Farnelid H, Bentzon-Tilia M, Andersson AF, Bertilsson S, Jost G, Labrenz M et al. Active nitrogen-fixing heterotrophic bacteria at and below the chemocline of the Central Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2013;7:1413–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Voß B, Bolhuis H, Fewer DP, Kopf M, Möke F, Haas F, et al. Insights into the physiology and ecology of the brackish-water-adapted cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena CCY9414 based on a genome-transcriptome analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e60224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Teikari JE, Fewer DP, Shrestha R, Hou S, Leikoski N, Mäkelä M, et al. Strains of the toxic and bloom-forming Nodularia spumigena (cyanobacteria) can degrade methylphosphonate and release methane. ISME J. 2018;12:1619–30. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0056-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Šulčius S, Alzbutas G, Kvederavičiūtė K, Koreivienė J, Zakrys L, Lubys A, et al. Draft genome sequence of the cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon flos-aquae strain 2012/KM1/D3, isolated from the Curonian Lagoon (Baltic Sea) Genome Announc. 2015;3:e01392–14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01392-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Brembu T, Mühlroth A, Alipanah L, Bones AM. The effects of phosphorus limitation on carbon metabolism in diatoms. Philos Trans R Soc Ser B. 2017;372:20160406. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Van Mooy BAS, Hmelo LR, Sofen LE, Campagna SR, May AL, Dyhrman ST, et al. Quorum sensing control of phosphorus acquisition in Trichodesmium consortia. ISME J. 2011;6:422. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Frischkorn KR, Rouco M, Van Mooy BAS, Dyhrman ST. Epibionts dominate metabolic functional potential of Trichodesmium colonies from the oligotrophic ocean. ISME J. 2017;11:2090–101. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Frischkorn KR, Rouco M, Van Mooy BAS, Dyhrman ST. The Trichodesmium microbiome can modulate host N2 fixation. Limnol Oceanogr Lett. 2018;3:401–8. doi: 10.1002/lol2.10092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Louati I, Pascault N, Debroas D, Bernard C, Humbert J-F, Leloup J. Structural diversity of bacterial communities associated with bloom-forming freshwater cyanobacteria differs according to the cyanobacterial genus. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0140614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1 (986.2KB, jpg)
Supplementary Figure S4 (936.6KB, tif)

Articles from The ISME Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES