Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2019 Jun;19(2):2091–2099. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i2.33

Predictors of recurrent TB in sputum smear and culture positive adults: a prospective cohort study

Grace Muzanyi 1, Y Mulumba 2, Paul Mubiri 1, Harriet Mayanja 1, John L Johnson 1,3, Ezekiel Mupere 1
PMCID: PMC6794518  PMID: 31656493

Abstract

Objective

To explore simple inexpensive non-culture based predictors of recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB).

Setting and study population

HIV-infected and uninfected adults with the first episode of smear positive, culture-confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis in a high tuberculosis burden country.

Design

A nested prospective cohort study of participants with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) presenting to a hospital out-patient clinic.

Results

A total of 630 TB culture confirmed participants were followed up for eighteen months of which 57 (9%) developed recurrent recurrent TB. On univariate analysis,4.7% low grade(1+) pre-treatment sputum smear participants developed recurrent tuberculosis Vs 8.8% with high grade(3+) smears (OR=0.31,95%CI: 0.10–0.93, p=0.037).On multivariate analysis: participants with extensive fibro-cavitation had a high risk of recurrent TB Vs minimal end of treatment fibro-cavitation (18%Vs12%, OR=2.3,95%CI:1.09–4.68, p=0.03). Weight gain with HIV infection was assosciated with a high risk of recurrent TB Vs weight gain with no HIV infection(18%Vs 6%, OR=6.8,95%CI:165–27.83, p=0.008) where as weight gain with a low pre-treatment high bacillary burden was assosciated with a low risk of recurrent TB Vs weight gain with a high pre-treatmentbacillary burden(6.5%Vs7.9%, OR=0.2,95%CI:0.05–0.79, p=0.02).

Conclusion

Extensive end of treatment pulmonary fibro-cavitation, high pre-treatment bacillary burden with no weight gain and HIV infection could be reliable predictors of recurrent tuberculosis.

Keywords: Grade, fibrosis, cavities, weight

Introduction

Long term, non-relapsing cure is the ultimate goal of anti-TB treatment; unfortunately recurrent disease(relapse/re-infection) occurs on average in about two to six percent of patients with drug-susceptible TB treated with modern rifampicin-containing short course regimens12. Recurrent TB may result from recurrent disease with the original or new infection strain of M. tuberculosis28. This may be due to several scenarios that include: poor adherence, immunosuppression mainly due to HIV co-infection10,13,28, Initial TB infection with a high bacillary burden17, drug resistant strains30, sub-optimal exposure in fixed dose combinations1, variation in biological response to TB treatment31 or exogenous re-infection with a new strain23.

Clinicians have sought to identify factors associated with an increased risk for recurrent TB after successful initial treatment. This can guide them in identifying patients and groups where treatment might be modified or where post-treatment follow-up might be useful. Lack of weight gain8, HIV infection13, pre-treatment greater radiographic involvement9, pre-treatment high bacillary burden17, post treatment residual fibro-cavitation9, sub-optimal exposure in fixed dose combinations1, cavitary disease on chest radiograph& a positive sputum culture after completing the first two months of anti-TB treatment have been associated with recurrent tuberculosis.

Sputum culture is costly and less affordable in many high TB burden settings26. Genexpert is as well costly and less specific in diagnosis of recurrent TB26,27. There is a programmatic intuitive need to identify simple, robust, inexpensive, convenient, non culture (non-molecular) based tools that rely on readily available assessments at the point of care to identify patients at risk for recurrent TB. Most TB suspects have a chest radiograph31 and sputum smear done during evaluation33. Patients with newly diagnosed TB are offered HIV testing by most programmes32 and even peripheral TB units have a weighing balance to measure body weight for anti-TB drug dosing. Sputum smear microscopy is a commonly used TB diagnostic tool even in resource constrained settings33. To our knowledge, no previous study has ever come up with a predictive non-culture based tool for recurrent TB from the list of previously identified risk factors. In this prospective cohort study, we examined whether one or any combination of weight gain, sputum smear grade, pre-treatment cavitation, end of treatment residual fibro-cavitation, radiographic extent of TB disease and HIV co-infection could form a non-culture based a predictive tool to identify patients at risk for recurrent TB in the initial eighteen months post-treatment in a well-followed up treatment cohort in Uganda, a nation with a high burden of TB.

Methods

Study population and setting

The participants included in this prospective cohort study were systematically selected from two parent studies. The parent studies recruited participants from several health units within a radius of 30 kilometers from the research Site in Kampala. This analysis included data from HIV-infected and -uninfected adults over 18 years-old with the first episode of smear positive, culture-confirmed, drug-susceptible pulmonary TB, treated in the Kawempe study(DMID protocol number:01–005) conducted from April 2002 to July2012 and the EDCTP TB diagnostics study(EDCTP - IP_09_32040_011)conducted from March 2010 through March 2013.Both studies were conducted at a large out-patient TB clinic within Mulago Hospital, a national tertiary referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda. All patients were treated with self-administered, standard short course therapy (2 months of daily INH, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide followed by daily treatment with Isoniazid and rifampicin for 4 months). The TB drugs were dispensed as single drugs.1 The Kawempe study enrolled TB index cases and followed up their household contacts. The Kawempe study embedded a mixture of cohort and cross sectional designs. A Kawempe community resident was defined as one who should have resided in the Kawempe area for at least three months. The Kawempe study excluded participants with recurrent TB and those who had taken more than 5 doses of anti-TB drugs for that episode of TB at the time of enrolment.Participants were followed up for eighteen months post TB treatment. A team of home health visitors ensured routine weekly field visits, phone calls and continued counseling of the participants to mitigate loss to follow up. The EDCTP TB diagnostics study was a prospective cohort study that evaluated TB cytokine signatures in blood, sputum and urine as markers of active TB infection in relation to sputum culture. It enrolled both controls and active TB cases, first episode of TB and excluded those who had taken more than 5 doses of anti-TB drugs.. All culture confirmed TB cases from both parent studies were systematically selected and screened for this analysis. Data was extracted using a tested and validated questionnaire by two staffs who were blinded to the study objective.

Procedures

HIV infection was defined as having a positive result on three approved, licensed rapid HIV testing kits in a validated HIV testing algorithm.Each participant had a posterior-anterior chest radiograph taken pre-treatment, end of treatment and at the time of suspected TB recurrence. The radiographic severity of TB disease was assessed as minimal, moderate or far advanced disease using the scheme of the US National TB and Respiratory Disease Association16. Body weight was measured at baseline and at each follow up visit using a calibrated beam balance (Detecto model). Sputum smear and culture were done monthly during the treatment phase, every 6 months during follow up and at the time of suspected recurrent TB. Sputum smears were done using fluorescent auramine staining. Smear grading was by the World Health Organization scale20. Sputum culture was on Lowenstein-Jensen slants. Mycobacterium tuberculosis speciation was by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)24. Initial isolates had drug susceptibility testing done for INH, rifampicin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide and streptomycin.

All participants with suspected recurrent TB were evaluated by clinical examination, chest radiography, multiple sputum smears and cultures. Recurrent TB was defined as culture confirmed TB during 18 months of follow up in participants who were microbiologically confirmed cured at the end of the initial six months of TB treatment. Weight gain was defined as gaining at least 5% of the pre-treatment body weight by the end of the first two months of anti-TB treatment8.

Treatment adherence was monitored by urine INH metabolite testing in addition to participant interview at each scheduled visit and review of attendance records. Defaulters were traced by home health visitors. All participants were followed up for 18 months after TB treatment. Both parent studies were approved by institutional review boards of the Joint Clinical Research Centre, the National AIDS Research Committee and the Ugandan National Council for Science and Technology. All participants gave written informed consent for participation in the parent studies.

Statistical analysis

Categorical data was analyzed using the chi-square. For weight gain, changes from baseline by month 2 were assessed using paired z-tests. Logistic regression was used in determining the association between weight gain, HIV status, radiographic extent of disease, sputum smear grade, end of treatment fibro-cavitation and the likelihood of TB recurrence.Stepwise selection method of predictor variables(weight gain, HIV status, chest x-ray extent of disease, fibro-cavitation and bacillary burden) was used for inclusion in the logistic model. All tests were two-sided. The odds ratio plus the corresponding 95% confidence interval and p-value were the effect measure. A confidence interval excluding the null value of 1 and a p-value<0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were done using Stata (Version 12, STATA, USA).

Results

A total of 1150 (figure 1) were screened and 690 bacteriologically confirmed PTB study participants were enrolled in the two parent studies between April 2001 and July 2012 of which 60 were excluded from this analysis since they were not followed up after completing treatment. Of the 630 followed up, 57 (9%) developed recurrent TB, 136(22%) were HIV infected, 311(49%) had far advanced disease on chest radiograph & 363(58%) had pulmonary cavitation. Majority 331(52%) were female & recurrent TB cases were older (mean age=30 yrs, SD=10.8 :) Vs the non- recurrent (NR) group (mean age 28.6yrs: SD=10.2).106(17%) had a low grade pretreatment smear & 160(25%) had a high grade smear. Majority 510(81%) had urine INH testing to confirm TB treatment adherence.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study profile

On univariate analysis (table 1), 4.7% of the low grade smear participants developed recurrent TB Vs 8.8% with a high grade smear (OR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.10–0.93, p=0.037). Weight gain and HIV infection did not independently influence the rate of recurrent TB on univariate analysis.On multivariate analysis:table 2; weight gain with a low grade smear was associated with an even lower risk of recurrent TB Vs weight gain with a high pre-treatment bacillary burden(OR=0.2,95%CI: 0.05–0.79, P=0.02):. Weight gain with HIV infection was associated with a high risk of recurrent TB Vs weight gain with no HIV infection (18% Vs 6%, OR=6.8,95%CI:165–27.83, p=0.008.About 18% of those with extensive fibro-cavitary sequellae at the end of TB treatment developed recurrent TB Vs 12% with minimal fibro-cavitary sequellae (OR=2.3, 95%CI: 1.09–4.68, P=0.03): table 3.

Table 1.

Univariate analysis

Variable Recurrent Non-Recurrent Total P-value
Weight gain
<5%
38 335 362 0.45
Females 28 303 331 0.64
Alcohol 04 79 083 0.17
Smoking 09 81 090 0.71
Age:mean(SD) 30(11) 29(10) ---- 0.22
HIV positive 12 124 136 0.92
Baseline cavities 38 325 363 0.15
Chest x-ray
extent of disease
Minimal 5 58 63 0.48
Moderate 16 193 209 0.45
Advanced 34 277 311 0.15
Smear
1+ 05 101 106 0.032
2+ 16 109 125 0.844
3+ 14 146 160 -------

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis

Variable Recurrent Non-Recurrent Total 95%CI P-value
Weight gain<5%,HIV+ 5 80 85 0.18–1.3 0.14
Weight gain≥5%,HIV- 11 165 176 1.7–27.8 0.008
Weight gain≥5%, moderate
disease
05 44 49 0.14–20.66 0.68
Weight gain≥5%, advanced
disease
12 122 1340.15–16.84 0.69
HIV-,moderate disease 15 159 1740.6–6.8 0.23
HIV-,advanced disease 39 268 307 0.46–26.9 0.20
Smear 1+, Weight gain≥5% 3 70 730.05–0.79 0.02

Table 3.

Radiographic extent of disease at month 6(fibro-cavitation)

Variable Recurrent Non-Recurrent Total 95%CI P-value
Minimal 16 123 139 -------- -----
Moderate 15 108 123 0.7–2.8 0.33
Advanced 13 58 71 1.1–4.7 0.03

Discussion

In this analysis, we report a 2 fold reduction in the risk of recurrent TB among participants with low grade compared to high grade pre-treatment smears (4.7%Vs8.8%) and inversely an increase in the risk of recurrent TB among participants with extensive end of treatment fibro-cavitary sequellae compared to those with minimal fibro-cavitary sequellae (18%Vs12%). Rupka Singla et al 2007 and panJab et al 2007 showed that high pre-treatment bacillary burden and residual cavitation by the end of TB treatment increases the risk for recurrent TB. Luzze et al 2013 showed that extensive end of treatment fibrosis and cavitation was associated with recurrent TB. Therefore our findings are similar to what has been reported in previous studies9,17,28. Participants with a low grade pretreatment smear and weight gain had an even lower risk of recurrent TB but weight gain alone did not independently influence the risk of recurrence8. We however observed a high proportion of failed weight gain in the recurrent TB group compared to their non-recurrent counter parts (67% Vs 59%) but this was not statistically significant although Khan et al 20068 showed that failure to gain ≥ 5% of baseline body weight by the end of the intensive phase of TB treatment was associated with an increased risk for TB recurrence. Our study found no statistically significant difference on univariate analysis although there was a higher proportion of failed weight gain in the recurrent Vs the non-recurrent group. We also observed an increased risk of recurrent TB among the HIV infected with weight gain Vs HIV uninfected with weight gain. Previous studies have shown increased rates of TB recurrence among HIV-TB patients10, this was the case with our study results too. We noted a higher proportion of recurrent TB (9%) in this population contrary to previously existing scientific data12 however, our results are in line with the findings of one previous study in the same population28. The high proportion of recurrent TB could be attributed to patients presenting late with advanced PTB9 as evidenced in this analysis where the majority( 49%) of the participants had radiographically far advanced disease. This is in agreement with Panjab et al 2007 findings of greater radiographic involvement being a risk factor for recurrent TB Urine INH metabolite testing was not done in 19% of the cases in which case non-adherence could have confounded recurrent PTB29. We also noted that about 54% of the cases presented with a high pre-treatment bacillary burden which could partially explain the high proportions of recurrent TB in this population17.

The strength of our study is that it involved an eighteen month follow-up of a large cohort of confirmed TB patients and monthly assessment of adherence by urinary INH metabolite testing during treatment. Our study had several limitations (i) the urine INH metabolite testing was only possible in 81% of the cases included in this analysis. (ii)DNA finger printing was not done to distinguish recurrent TB due to relapse from exogenous reinfection with a different strain28.

Recommendation

Previous studies have listed several factors assosciated with TB disease recurrence but no predictive tool has been assembled out of this literature to influence management of recurrent TB. We recommend that clinicians should put into perspective the possibility of prolonging treatment and close patient monitoring for TB patients who :(i) present with a high pre-treatment bacillary burden (3+) and failure to gain at least 5% of baseline body weight by the end of the intensive phase of TB treatment. (ii)Are HIV positive.(iii) have extensive end of treatment fibrosis and residual cavitation on chest x-ray (grade 3).

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the study participants, Uganda-Case research collaboration project clinic staff and field workers, the Uganda National TB and Leprosy Programme and Mulago Hospital for their assistance in completing these long term studies.

Funding

The parent studies were funded by the Tuberculosis Research Unit at Case Western Reserve University, established with funds from the United States National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health and Human Services, under contract NO1-AI95383 and HHSN266 200700022C/NO1-AI-70022 and the European Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) Grant number: EDCTP - IP_09_32040_011.

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Pramudita A, Rumende CM, Findyartini A. Fixed-dose combination anti-tuberculosis therapy as a risk factor for tuberculosis recurrence: an evidence based case report. Acta Med Indones. 2017 Apr;49(2):175–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kopanoff D, Snider E, Jr, Johnson M. Recurrent tuberculosis: why do patients develop disease again? Atlanta, GA 30333: United States Public Health Service cooperative survey Division of Tuberculosis Control, Centers for Disease Control; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pettit AC, Kaltenbach LA, Maruri F, Cummins J, Smith TR, Warkentin JV, Griffin MR. Chronic lung disease and HIV infection are risk factors for recurrent tuberculosis in a low-incidence setting. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011 Jul;15(7):906. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.10.0448. TR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sterling TR, Alwood K, Gachuhi R, et al. Relapse rates after short-course (6-Month) treatment of tuberculosis in HIV-infected and uninfected persons. AIDS. 1999;13:1899–1904. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199910010-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Golub JE, Durovni B, King BS, et al. Recurrent tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients in Riode Janeiro, Brazil. AIDS. 2008;22:2527–2533. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328311ac4e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cox H, Kebede Y, Allamuratova S, Ismailov G, Davletmuratova Z, et al. Tuberculosis recurrence and mortality after successful treatment: Impact of drug resistance. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nyamogoba H DN, Kikuvi G, Mbuthia G, Mpoke S, Obala A A, Biegon R, et al. A high rate of recurrent tuberculosis in western Kenya independent of human [] Immunodeficiency virus infection. Afr J Health Sci. 2012;20:62–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khan Awal, Sterling Timothy R, Reves Randall, Vernon Andrew, Horsburgh C Robert, Tuberculosis Trials Consortium Lack of Weight Gain and Relapse Risk in a Large. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:344–348. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200511-1834OC. Tuberculosis Treatment Trial: Am J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Panjabi R1, Comstock GW, Golub JE. Recurrent tuberculosis and its risk factors: adequately treated patients are still at high risk. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Aug;11(8):828–837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hawken M, FRACP, a, P Nunn, MRCPa, Godfrey-Faussett P, MRCPa, McAdam K.P.W.J, FRCPa (Prof), Morris J, MScb, Odhiambo J, et al. Recurrence of tuberculosis in HIV-1-infected patients in Kenya. The Lancet. 1993 Aug 7;342(8867):332–337. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91474-z. Originally published as Volume 2, Issue 8867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Falk A, O'Connor JB, Pratt PC, Webb WR, Wier JA, Wolinsky E. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. 12th Ed. New York: National Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease Association; 1969. Chapter 6. Classification of pulmonary tuberculosis; pp. 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weis Stephen E, Slocum Philip C, Blais Francis X, King Barbara, Nunn Mary, Matney G Burgis. The Effect of Directly Observed Therapy on the Rates of Drug Resistance and Relapse in Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1179–1184. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199404283301702:. April 28, 1994 13. Int J TubercLung Dis. 2011 Jul; 15(7):906–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhdanov V, Bilenko N, Mor Z. Risk Factors for Recurrent Tuberculosis among Successfully treated Patients in Israel, 1999–2011. Isr Med Assoc J. 2017 Apr;19(4):237–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Millet Juan-Pablo, Shaw Evelyn, Orcau Àngels, Casals Martí, Miró Jose M, Caylà Joan A, The Barcelona Tuberculosis Recurrence Working Group Tuberculosis Recurrence after Completion Treatment in a European City: Reinfection or Relapse? PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e64898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blumberg HM, Burman WJ, Chaisson RE, Daley CL, Etkind SC, Friedman LN, Fujiwara P, Grzemska M, Hopewell PC, Iseman MD, Jasmer RM, Koppaka V, Menzies RI, O'Brien RJ, Reves RR, Reichman LB, Simone PM, Starke JR, Vernon AA, American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Infectious Diseases Society treatment of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit CareMed. 2003 Feb 15;167(4):603–662. doi: 10.1164/rccm.167.4.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Falk A, O'Connor JB, Pratt PC, Webb WR, Wier JA, Wolinsky E. Chapter 6. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singla Rupak, Singla Neeta, Sarin Rohit, Arora V K. Influence of Pre-Treatment Bacillary Load on Treatment Outcome of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients Receiving DOTS under RNTCP: Influence of Pre-Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2005;47:19–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Diagnostic Standards and Classification of Tuberculosis. 12th Ed. New York: National Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease Association; 1969. pp. 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Uganda national TB and leprosy control guidelines. 2nd edition 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.World Health organization (WHO), author guidelines on the grading of sputum smear microscopy. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.World health organization, author. TB treatment guidelines. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pekovic V, Mayanja H, Vjecha M, Johnson J, Okwera A, Nsubuga P, Mugerwa R, Ellner J, Whalen C. Comparison of three composite compliance indices in a trial of self-administered preventive therapy for tuberculosis in HIV-infected Ugandan adults. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:597–607. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00033-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schiroli C, Carugati M, Zanini F, Bandera A, Di Nardo Stuppino S, Monge E, Morosi M, Gori A, Matteelli A, Codecasa L, Franzetti F. Exogenous reinfection of tuberculosis in a low-burden area. Infection. 2015 Dec;43(6):647–653. doi: 10.1007/s15010-015-0759-9. Epub 2015 Mar 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maruthai K, Ravibalan T, Vallayyachari K, Kesavan S, Samrot AV, Muthaiah M. Molecular typing and differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates using Double Repetitive Element PCR and Duplex PCR. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2015 Mar;4(1):60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2014.11.061. Epub 2015 Jan 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Racil H, Ben Amar J, Mami M, Chabbou A. Predictive factors for recurrence of pulmonary tuberculosis in Tunisia: a retrospective study. Rev Mal Respir. 2012 Mar;29(3):412–418. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 15. French. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rupert S, Vassall A, Raizada N, Khaparde SD, Boehme C, Salhotra VS, Sachdeva S, Nair SA, Hoog AH. Bottom-up or top-down: unit cost estimation of tuberculosis diagnostic tests in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Apr 1;21(4):375–380. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Friedrich SO, Rachow A, Saathoff E, Singh K, Mangu CD, Dawson R, Phillips PP, Venter A, Bateson A, Boehme CC, Heinrich N, Hunt RD, Boeree MJ, Zumla A, McHugh TD, Gillespie SH, Diacon AH, Hoelscher M, Pan African Consortium for the Evaluation of Anti-tuberculosis Antibiotics (PanACEA) Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay as an early sputum biomarker of response to tuberculosis treatment. Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Aug;1(6):46270. doi: 10.1016/S22132600(13)7011:4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Luzze H, Johnson DF, Dickman K, Mayanja-Kizza H, Okwera A, Eisenach K, Cave MD, Whalen CC, Johnson JL, Boom WH, Joloba M, Tuberculosis Research Unit Relapse more common than reinfection in recurrent tuberculosis 1–2 years post treatment in urban Uganda. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Mar;17(3):361–367. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cadosch D, Abel Zur Wiesch P, Kouyos R, Bonhoeffer S. The Role of Adherence and Retreatment in De Novo Emergence of MDR-TB. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Mar 11;12(3):e1004749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004749. eCollection 2016 Mar. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Goswami A, Chakraborty U, Mahapatra T, Mahapatra S, Mukherjee T, Das S, Das A, Dey SK, Ray S, Bhattacharya B, Pal NK. Correlates of treatment outcomes and drug resistance among pulmonary tuberculosis patients attending tertiary care hospitals of Kolkata, India. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):e109563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109563. eCollection 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Clifford V, He Y, Zufferey C, Connell T, Curtis N. Interferon gamma release assays for monitoring the response to treatment for tuberculosis: A systematic review. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2015 Dec;95(6):639–650. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aliyu G, El-Kamary SS, Abimiku A, Hungerford L, Obasanya J, Blattner W. Cost-effectiveness of point-ofcare digital chest-x-ray in HIV patients with pulmonary mycobacterial infections in Nigeria. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 13;14:675. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0675-0.:. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Thomas BE, Ramachandran R, Anitha S, Swaminathan S. Feasibility of routine HIV testing among TB patients through a voluntary counseling and testing centre. Int J TubercLung Dis. 2007 Dec;11(12):1296–1301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Myint O, Saw S, Isaakidis P, Khogali M, Reid A, Hoa NB, Kyaw TT, Zaw KK, Khaing TMM, Aung ST. Active case-finding for tuberculosis by mobile teams in Myanmar: yield and treatment outcomes. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Jun 2;6(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0291-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES