Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Oct 17;8(42):e01153-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01153-19

Complete Genome Sequence of Citrobacter freundii Myophage Maleficent

Hayden H Wright a, Victoria Berkowitz a, Chandler O’Leary a, Heather Newkirk a, Rohit Kongari a, Jason Gill a, Mei Liu a,
Editor: John J Dennehyb
PMCID: PMC6797544  PMID: 31624155

Citrobacter freundii, a member of the Enterobacteriaceae family, has been linked to opportunistic infections in neonates and immunocompromised adults. Here, we report the complete genome sequence of a T4-like myophage, Maleficent, which infects C. freundii.

ABSTRACT

Citrobacter freundii, a member of the Enterobacteriaceae family, has been linked to opportunistic infections in neonates and immunocompromised adults. Here, we report the complete genome sequence of a T4-like myophage, Maleficent, which infects C. freundii.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Citrobacter freundii is a Gram-negative bacterium belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae. Apart from causing opportunistic nosocomial urinary tract infections in immunocompromised patients (1, 2), C. freundii has been associated with fatal cases of neonatal meningitis (3, 4). With the rise of antibiotic-resistant Citrobacter strains (5), alternative treatment options such as phage therapy are being explored (6, 7). The isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting C. freundii, such as the myophage Maleficent described in this study, could help with such strategies.

Phage Maleficent was isolated using a C. freundii strain from a municipal wastewater sample collected from College Station, TX, in 2015. LB broth or agar (Difco) was used to culture the host bacteria and for phage enrichment at 37°C with aeration. Phage isolation and propagation were conducted using the soft-agar overlay method (8). Maleficent was identified as a myophage using negative-stain transmission electron microscopy performed at the Texas A&M University Microscopy and Imaging Center, as described previously (9). Phage genomic DNA was prepared using a modified Promega Wizard DNA cleanup kit protocol (9). Pooled indexed DNA libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq Nano LT kit, and the sequence was obtained from the Illumina MiSeq platform using the MiSeq V2 500-cycle reagent kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions, producing 773,101 paired-end reads for the index containing the phage Maleficent genome. FastQC 0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) was used to quality control the reads. The reads were trimmed with the FASTX-Toolkit 0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/download.html) before being assembled using SPAdes 3.5.0 (10). Contig completion was confirmed by PCR using primers (5′-AACCGTTTAGTAACCCTGTTAG-3′ and 5′-ACATGTACAACCTGCATCAC-3′) facing off the ends of the assembled contig and Sanger sequencing of the resulting product, with the contig sequence manually corrected to match the resulting Sanger sequencing read. GLIMMER 3.0 (11) and MetaGeneAnnotator 1.0 (12) were used to predict protein-coding genes with manual verification, and tRNA genes were predicted with ARAGORN 2.36 (13). Rho-independent termination sites were identified via TransTerm (http://transterm.cbcb.umd.edu/). Sequence similarity searches were done by BLASTp 2.2.28 (14) against the NCBI nr, UniProt Swiss-Prot (15), and TrEMBL databases. InterProScan 5.15–54.0 (16), LipoP (17), and TMHMM v2.0 (18) were used to predict protein function. All analyses were conducted at default settings via the CPT Galaxy (19) and Web Apollo (20) interfaces (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-pub).

Myophage Maleficent has an 89,570-bp-long genome (assembled at 34.7-fold coverage) with 34.7% GC content, which is lower than that of the host (51.6%) (21). Overall, 137 protein-coding sequences were annotated, leading to a coding density of 81%. About 76% of the annotated proteins in the Maleficent genome have homologs in phage T4 (NCBI RefSeq accession no. NC_000866). Most of the genes annotated with a function were either linked to DNA replication (such as polynucleotide kinase, terminase large subunit, DNA ligase, DNA polymerase, DNA helicase, thymidylate synthase, and exonuclease) or involved in virion morphogenesis (such as head maturation protease, major capsid protein, tail protein, tape measure protein, baseplate assembly protein, and tail fiber protein). Genes associated with host lysis, such as class III holins, lysozymes, and an overlapping spanin pair, were also annotated in the genome.

Data availability.

The genome sequence of phage Maleficent was submitted to GenBank as accession no. MH920362. The associated BioProject, SRA, and BioSample accession numbers are PRJNA222858, SRR8556430, and SAMN10909361, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (awards EF-0949351 and DBI-1565146). Additional support came from the Center for Phage Technology (CPT), an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife, and from the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics at Texas A&M University.

We are grateful for the advice and support of the CPT staff and the Texas A&M University Microscopy and Imaging Center.

This announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for BICH464 Phage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ranjan KP, Ranjan N. 2013. Citrobacter: an emerging health care associated urinary pathogen. Urol Ann 5:313–314. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Whalen JG, Mully TW, English JC III. 2007. Spontaneous Citrobacter freundii infection in an immunocompetent patient. Arch Dermatol 143:115–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gwynn CM, George RH. 1973. Neonatal citrobacter meningitis. Arch Dis Child 48:455–458. doi: 10.1136/adc.48.6.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Plakkal N, Soraisham AS, Amin H. 2013. Citrobacter freundii brain abscess in a preterm infant: a case report and literature review. Pediatr Neonatol 54:137–140. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen YS, Wong WW, Fung CP, Yu KW, Liu CY. 2002. Clinical features and antimicrobial susceptibility trends in Citrobacter freundii bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 35:109–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chaudhry W, Haq IU, Andleeb S, Qadri I. 2014. Characterization of a virulent bacteriophage LK1 specific for Citrobacter freundii isolated from sewage water. J Basic Microbiol 54:531. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201200710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hamdi S, Rousseau GM, Labrie SJ, Kourda RS, Tremblay DM, Moineau S, Slama KB. 2016. Characterization of five podoviridae phages infecting Citrobacter freundii. Front Microbiol 7:1023–1023. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Adams MK. 1959. Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, Inc, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gill JJ, Berry JD, Russell WK, Lessor L, Escobar-Garcia DA, Hernandez D, Kane A, Keene J, Maddox M, Martin R, Mohan S, Thorn AM, Russell DH, Young R. 2012. The Caulobacter crescentus phage phiCbK: genomics of a canonical phage. BMC Genomics 13:542. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res 15:387–396. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The UniProt Consortium. 2018. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46:2699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong SY, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Juncker AS, Willenbrock H, Von Heijne G, Brunak S, Nielsen H, Krogh A. 2003. Prediction of lipoprotein signal peptides in Gram-negative bacteria. Protein Sci 12:1652–1662. doi: 10.1110/ps.0303703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cock PJ, Gruning BA, Paszkiewicz K, Pritchard L. 2013. Galaxy tools and workflows for sequence analysis with applications in molecular plant pathology. PeerJ 1:e167. doi: 10.7717/peerj.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee E, Helt GA, Reese JT, Munoz-Torres MC, Childers CP, Buels RM, Stein L, Holmes IH, Elsik CG, Lewis SE. 2013. Web Apollo: a Web-based genomic annotation editing platform. Genome Biol 14:R93. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumar S, Kaur C, Kimura K, Takeo M, Raghava GPS, Mayilraj S. 2013. Draft genome sequence of the type species of the genus Citrobacter, Citrobacter freundii MTCC 1658. Genome Announc 1:e00120-12. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00120-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence of phage Maleficent was submitted to GenBank as accession no. MH920362. The associated BioProject, SRA, and BioSample accession numbers are PRJNA222858, SRR8556430, and SAMN10909361, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES