Abstract
Background
Reconstructive surgery is often required for tumors of the oral and maxillofacial region, irrespective of whether they are benign or malignant, the area involved, and the tumor size. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) models are increasingly used in reconstructive surgery. However, these models have rarely been adapted for the fabrication of custom-made reconstruction materials. In this report, we present a case of maxillary reconstruction using a laboratory-engineered, custom-made mesh plate from a 3D model.
Case presentation
The patient was a 56-year-old female, who had undergone maxillary resection in 2011 for intraoral squamous cell carcinoma that presented as a swelling of the anterior maxillary gingiva. Five years later, there was no recurrence of the malignant tumor and a maxillary reconstruction was planned. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a large bony defect in the dental-alveolar area of the anterior maxilla. Using the CT data, a 3D model of the maxilla was prepared, and the site of reconstruction determined. A custom-made mesh plate was fabricated using the 3D model (Okada Medical Supply, Tokyo, Japan). We performed the reconstruction using the custom-made titanium mesh plate and the particulate cancellous bone and marrow graft from her iliac bone. We employed the tunneling flap technique without alveolar crest incision, to prevent surgical wound dehiscence, mesh exposure, and alveolar bone loss. Ten months later, three dental implants were inserted in the graft. Before the final crown setting, we performed a gingivoplasty with palate mucosal graft. The patient has expressed total satisfaction with both the functional and esthetic outcomes of the procedure.
Conclusion
We have successfully performed a maxillary and dental reconstruction using a custom-made, pre-bent titanium mesh plate.
Keywords: Mouth neoplasms, Reconstructive surgical procedure, Three-dimensional printing, Surgical flap
Background
Oral and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery provides optimal structural and functional rehabilitation for people with congenital anomalies, tumors, and trauma involving the maxillary and mandibular area. Irrespective of whether a tumor is benign or malignant, reconstructive surgery is often required based on the area of involvement and tumor size. Recently, various surgical specialties, including oral and maxillofacial surgery, employ three-dimensional (3D) models for reconstruction surgery [1–3]. However, these models have been rarely adapted for the fabrication of custom-made reconstruction materials [4, 5]. In this report, we present a case of mandibular reconstruction using a custom-made titanium mesh plate. The mesh plate was made in a laboratory from the computed tomography (CT)-generated 3D model of a patient’s maxillary area. We also used alternative surgical techniques to prevent postoperative wound dehiscence.
Case report
The patient was a 56-year-old female, who presented with the chief complaint of swelling in the anterior upper gingiva in 2011 (Fig. 1). On examination and biopsy, she was diagnosed with intraoral squamous cell carcinoma (T1N0M0) for which a maxillary resection was performed. Immediate reconstruction was not adopted because of the large defect in the alveolar mucosa and difficulty with postoperative follow-up. Five years later, there was no recurrence of the malignant tumor, and hence, a maxillary reconstruction was planned. On examination, the patients’ facial appearance was symmetrical, but without the prosthesis, her upper lip recessed. CT revealed a large bony defect involving the dental-alveolar area in the anterior maxilla (Fig. 2). Using the data from the CT, we prepared a 3D model of the maxilla using a 3D printer (Stratasys Co. Connex 260) and the site of reconstruction was determined. Then, a custom-made mesh titanium plate was fabricated in the remote laboratory, based on the 3D model (ULTRA FLEX MESH CUSTOM, Okada Medical Supply, Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 3). This plate thickness is 0.6 mm. And the titanium mesh plate was given a basic hexagonal polygonal shape designed to have high 3D flexibility.
Fig. 1.
First examination showing swelling (arrow) diagnosed as gingival SCC of the maxilla. a Intraoral findings. b Preoperative radiograph. SCC, squamous cell carcinoma
Fig. 2.
Findings after partial resection of the maxilla. a Intraoral findings showing abundant scar tissue formation. b Postoperative radiograph. c Postoperative cone-beam CT showing segmental defect in the anterior maxilla
Fig. 3.
3D custom-made titanium mesh plate. a 3D custom plate was made on 3D model. b Occlusal view
We used the custom-made titanium mesh plate and particulate cancellous bone and marrow graft (PCBM) from her iliac bone to reconstruct the maxillary defect. To prevent surgical wound dehiscence and subsequent exposure of the mesh plate and alveolar bone loss, the custom-made mesh plate was inserted using the tunneling flap technique as opposed to the alveolar crest incision. The mesh plate was fixed to the maxilla using several bone screws, following which PCBM was used to fill the inside of the mesh. Finally, we closed the surgical incision by suturing (Fig. 4). The total operative time was 118 min, and total blood loss was 50 ml. No adverse events occurred during the surgery.
Fig. 4.
Reconstruction with a custom-made titanium mesh by tunneling flap technique. a Intraoperative oral photograph. b Postoperative radiograph
Seven months after the reconstruction, we removed the mesh plate and performed a vestibuloplasty with an atelocollagen sheet (TERUDERMIS™, OLYMPUS TERUMO BIOMATERIALS, Tokyo, Japan). (Fig. 5). Ten months after reconstruction, three dental implant fixtures (diameter 3.3 mm, SLActive, Straumann Japan) were inserted in the graft (Fig. 6). Before the final crown setting, we performed an additional gingivoplasty using palate mucosal graft (Fig. 7). The patient has been completely satisfied with the treatment, both functionally and esthetically. This case report has been approved by the ethics committee of Tokyo Dental College (no. 646) (Tokyo, Japan).
Fig. 5.
Cone-beam CT findings after removal of the mesh. a Axial. b Coronal. c Sagittal
Fig. 6.
Placement of three dental implants and provisional prosthesis. a Intraoral findings. b Postoperative radiograph
Fig. 7.
After gingivoplasty with palate graft for prevention of peri-implantitis. a Intraoral findings after gingivoplasty. b Intraoral findings, final prosthesis
Discussion
Many institutions have recently started using 3D printers to create 3D models for various diseases in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The first medical fabrication laboratory in Japan was established at Tokyo Dental College, “the Fab Lab TDC,” in December 2013 [1]. The laboratory utilizes various techniques to construct 3D models of the jaw, based on both CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images [1–3]. In the past, we had created 3D-printed models of jaw deformities and maxillary and mandibular tumors, and used them primarily during a consultation as preoperative simulations in patients. Globally, customized metal plates for jaw deformity and its reconstruction are made using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), based on preoperative computer simulations [6–8].
In our case, we successfully retained the shape and the function of the maxilla following a large resection by using a 3D custom-made titanium mesh plate and PCBM. The fabrication of custom-made products required CT data of the patient, and the relevant images were sent to FabLab TDC. The FabLab TDC used a 3D printer and Mimics software (Materialize NV, Leuven, Belgium) to construct a 3D model. Artifacts were removed manually using a computer. During conventional reconstruction, the surgeon bends the 3D mesh plate during surgery, whereas the current technique has the advantage of using a pre-bent, 3D mesh plate that is much easier to fix intraoperatively. The overall process of fabrication is simple and fast and has widespread applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This advancement in medical technology may lead to significant improvement in surgical care and outcome.
Titanium mesh was first used in 1985 for the reconstruction of atrophic alveoli [9]. Boyne et al. reported contouring the titanium mesh over the edentulous dental models to restore it to a more ideal ridge form [9]. The use of titanium mesh with particulate bone graft has several advantages [10]. The main disadvantages of a titanium mesh plate were the cost and the high rate of plate exposure [11]. In particular, when a large augmentation is planned, a vestibular incision may increase the risk of wound dehiscence. In our case, following the tumor resection, the mucosal wound healing was weak. As a result, we decided to employ a minimally invasive subperiosteal tunneling flap technique [12, 13]. The severe adhesion and fibrosis were left behind the maxillary resection. We made it possible to use a titanium mesh plate by inserting a long incision on the labial side and a cervical incision on the palate side. And paying attention to the blood supply of the mucous membrane, peritoneal-releasing incisions were made at the same time. The use of a pre-bent 3D titanium mesh and the tunneling flap makes the surgery much easier and simpler, and subsequently improves the accuracy and safety. It has been previously reported that the use of a custom-made mesh plate for maxillary reconstruction shortens the surgery time [4, 5].
Conclusion
We have successfully performed a maxillary and dental reconstruction, using a 3D custom-made, pre-bent titanium mesh plate, fabricated from a 3D model which was generated from CT data. The tunneling flap technique for titanium mesh insertion is ideal for cases predisposed to post-surgical wound dehiscence, graft exposure and infection, and alveolar bone loss. The use of a pre-bent titanium mesh with tunneling flap incision reduces surgery time and improves safety.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the members of the Tokyo Dental College Suidobashi Hospital for their cooperation.
Authors’ contributions
MT and KS participated in the design of the study and coordination of the report. MK, YK, KO, SM, and SH participated in the writing and helped to draft the manuscript. AT and TS participated in the design of the study and revision. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
None.
Availability of data and materials
None.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This case report has been approved by the ethics committee of Tokyo Dental College (no. 646) (Tokyo, Japan).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Katsumi Y, Sugahara K, Matsunaga S, Odaka K, Mitomo K, Abe S, et al. Planning for orthognathic surgery at medical fabrication laboratory in Tokyo dental college (fab lab TDC) clinical application of full-scale-model made by 3-dimensional ink jet printer for orthognathic surgery. Oral Science Japan. 2016;2016:9–11. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ayoub AF, Rehab M, O’neil M, Khambay B, Ju X, Barbenel J, et al. A novel approach for planning orthognathic surgery: the integration of dental casts into three-dimensional printed mandibular models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yuan P, Mai H, Li J, Ho DC, Lai Y, Liu S, et al. Design, development and clinical validation of computer-aided surgical simulation system for streamlined orthognathic surgical planning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12:2129–2143. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1585-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamada H, Nakaoka K, Sonoyama T, Kumagai K, Ikawa T, Shigeta Y, Harada N, Kawamura N, Ogawa T, Hamada Y. Clinical usefulness of mandibular reconstruction using custom-made titanium mesh tray and autogenous particulate cancellous bone and marrow harvested from tibia and/or ilia. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(3):586–592. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Iino M, Fukuda M, Nagai H, Hamada Y, Yamada H, Nakaoka K, Mori Y, Chikazu D, Saijo H, Seto I, Ohkubo K, Takato T. Evaluation of 15 mandibular reconstructions with Dumbach titan mesh-system and particulate cancellous bone and marrow harvested from bilateral posterior ilia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(4):e1–e8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Suojanen J, Leikola J, Stoor P. The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: a series of 32 maxillary osteotomy patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:1913–1916. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cornelius CP, Smolka W, Giessler GA, Wilde F, Probst FA. Patient-specific reconstruction plates are the missing link in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: a showcase for technical description. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:624–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wilde F, Hanken H, Probst F, Schramm A, Heiland M, Cornelius CP. Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;10:2035–2051. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1193-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D, et al. A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43(2):87–91. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(85)90054-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Louis PJ, Gutta R, Said-Al-Naief N, et al. Reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible with particulate bone graft and titanium mesh for implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(2):235–245. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Louis PJ. Vertical ridge augmentation using titanium mesh. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010;22(3):353–368. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xuan F, Lee C, Jeong S, Fang Y, Jeong S, Choi B. Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks: a comparison between the flap and tunneling procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1660–1670. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Venet L, Perriat M, Mangano FG, Fortin T. Horizontal ridge reconstruction of the anterior maxilla using customized allogeneic bone blocks with a minimally invasive technique - a case series. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0423-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
None.