Summary
Proprioceptive neurons provide feedback about body positions and movements that are critical for coordination. Using Drosophila larvae, two papers use high-speed microscopy to create movies revealing sequential, direction-dependent changes in dendritic folding and activities of proprioceptive neurons in freely-moving animals.
Proprioception is what allows us to make coordinated movements. This is accomplished through neurons that sense both the static and dynamic positions of body parts. Every time an animal moves, proprioceptive neurons send out signals that are received by the central nervous system, ultimately modifying commands to muscles that control movements. This process, called proprioceptive feedback, is essential so that muscle activity can adjust under a variety of changing situations, such as occurs during planned motor sequences or when body position shifts suddenly in response to an unpredictable perturbation. Proprioception helps animals accomplish basic survival tasks including defense, navigation to food sources, migration away from noxious environments and mating. Despite the critical role for proprioception, our understanding of how proprioceptive neurons are activated and how they coordinate their activities in real time during different types of movements is understood poorly. An impediment to solving this problem is that it is very difficult to monitor dynamic changes in the shape and activities of proprioceptive neurons in freely-moving animals. Two papers in this issue of Current Biology use high-speed video microscopy in Drosophila larvae to reveal sequential changes in the folding of dendrites of proprioceptive neurons and neuronal activity patterns that correlate with these shape changes in untethered, moving animals [1, 2]. The studies by He and colleagues and Vaadia and colleagues represent major accomplishments, which set the stage for testing new models underlying proprioception.
Illuminating how proprioceptive neurons detect body position and movements entails overcoming a special challenge that is not incurred when studying most other senses. How sensory cells are activated by stimuli such as light, odorants, tastants and thermal input is largely resolved once the signaling molecules and the cellular architecture of the receptor cells are known. In the case of proprioceptive neurons, this sort of information is insufficient. Since proprioceptors sense movement or mechanical cues, it is not possible to clarify how these neurons are activated, and how this activation impacts motor function, without examining the dynamic changes in the flexing of their dendrites, and their activity in untethered, exploring animals.
This is where Drosophila larvae come to the rescue. Larvae have two missions in life—to eat and avoid being eaten. These vital objectives require forward and backward locomotion, turning, burrowing and occasionally rolling perpendicular to their body axis [3]. The forward and backward movements are accomplished through repetitive, rhythmic strides [4, 5]. These strides remain relatively constant at a variety of speeds [5]. During forward locomotion the muscles within the body wall of each of the 8 abdominal segments undergo peristaltic waves of posterior-to-anterior contractions. When larvae reverse direction to move backward, the contractions now initiate from the anterior. These waves of contractions are coordinated within and between segments to enable smooth movement.
Acting presynaptic to the motor neurons that control the muscles are several multidendritic (md) sensory neurons that tile the body wall of each abdominal segment [6]. These include three class I md neurons (dorsal ddaD, ddaE; ventral, vpda) with relatively large, non-overlapping receptive fields, and dorsal and ventral md bipolar neurons (dbd and vbd), which extend processes in the anterior to posterior direction (Figure 1). Inactivation of all md neurons disrupts locomotion, suggesting that they are proprioceptors providing important information about body position [7, 8]. Previous work using a dissected larval preparation and a genetically encoded Ca2+ sensor, GCaMP, demonstrate that md neurons respond to muscle contractions [9]. It has been proposed that upon segment contraction, the md proprioceptive neurons in the peripheral nervous system send a “mission accomplished” signal to the central nervous system, allowing the muscles in one segment to relax, thereby promoting rapid propagation of the peristaltic wave to the adjacent segment during locomotion [8].
Figure 1.
Cartoons illustrating distinct, sequential folding patterns and activities exhibited by proprioceptive neurons during forward and backward movement of a Drosophila larva. Shown at the top is a cartoon of a larva with the anterior (A) and posterior (P) ends indicated. Directly below the larva is a cartoon of one abdominal segment with six proprioceptive neurons. The red dashed box indicates the ddaE and ddaD neurons. To the right and left are depictions of the changes in dendritic folding and neuronal activities (using a genetically encoded Ca2+ sensor, GCaMP6f) exhibited by ddaE and ddaD neurons during forward and backward locomotion. Time 0 indicates the relaxed state, and times 1 and 2 depict two points during a contraction wave in either the forward or backward directions. The colors of the neurons indicate the relative level of free intracellular Ca2+ as assessed using the GCaMP6f sensor. A relative Ca2+ scale is shown. This illustration was prepared by Dr. Dhananjay Thakur.
But the burning question is how proprioceptive neurons provide the feedback on rapidly changing body positions, endowing untethered larvae the ability to navigate through the environment. In particular, how is locomotion in different directions, such as forward and backward movement, sensed? To answer this, researchers needed to find a way to visualize changes in the ultrastructure and activity of the proprioceptive neurons in real time in freely-moving larvae. To do so, the two teams expressed fluorescent proteins in the md neurons and established rapid scanning microscopy methods to view the peripheral nervous system in a given segment 10 or more times per second, either by improving a 3-D light sheet approach, called SCAPE (Swept Confocally Aligned Planar Excitation) [2], or by employing a high-speed confocal microscope with a motor-driven objective [1].
The videos showing the real-time deformations of the dendrites in the larval body wall are beautiful and informative. The differences between videos and fixed images of md neurons are dramatic—like watching the first-ever film from 1878, which revealed all four horse’s hooves lift off the ground simultaneously during a gallop—an observation that was never caught in the early still photographs.
The movies of the Drosophila larvae display dynamic flexing of the dendrites of proprioceptive neurons during locomotion in different directions. During forward motion the most posterior dendrites of the ventral class I neuron (vpda) [2] and the dorsal class I neuron, ddaE, fold inward during each contraction, followed by bending of the dendrites corresponding to the more anterior dorsal class I neuron (ddaD) [1, 2] (Figure 1). These observations highlight that the forces during contraction proceed from the posterior to the anterior part of each segment, rather than simultaneous contraction from both ends towards the middle. When the larvae move backward, the ddaD neurons are the first to fold inward (Figure 1). In addition to revealing the folding and curvature patterns of these and other md neurons during movements, the studies with the Ca2+ sensor, GCaMP6f, indicate that they are activated by deformations of their dendrites. Moreover, the various proprioceptive neurons are activated sequentially, and to different extents during the segment contractions that accompany movement. For example, in the forward direction maximal activation of ddaE exceeds ddaD, while during backward locomotion, ddaD shows greater activity (Figure 1). The successive and different magnitudes of activation of proprioceptors that extend dendrites over distinct regions of each segment could provide a mechanism through which different neurons code for distinct body positions and movements, including the angles of leftward and rightward turning, and head retraction.
Not all of the proprioceptive neurons are activated by contraction. Rather, the activities of morphological similar bipolar neurons on the dorsal and ventral side of each abdominal segment (dbd and vbd) are activated by stretch and contraction respectively [2, 10], highlighting that the repertoire of proprioceptors provide continuous feedback on various types of body positions. A question for the future is whether each proprioceptive neuron is activated and turned off independently or whether there is direct communication between the different proprioceptors.
Which cation channels sense the mechanical forces applied to the dendrites of the proprioceptive neurons in larvae during locomotion? Candidates include NOMPC (a TRPN channel) and TMC since mutations affecting either of these cation channels impair larval locomotion [9, 11]. Based on analyses with GCaMP sensors in dissected preparations, both channels contribute to the activities of class I md neurons [9–11]. Moreover, NOMPC and TMC have multiple mechanosensory roles in flies [9, 11–16]. In mammals, recent evidence supports the idea that TMC1 is the enigmatic auditory transduction channel, perhaps forming a dimer in association with TMC2 [17]. He et al. focused on tmc mutant larvae and found using GCaMP that the dynamic changes in the activities of the ddaD and ddaE dorsal proprioceptors neurons that normally accompany locomotion were eliminated [1]. The impact of the tmc mutation on the activities of the other class I neurons remains to be determined.
Do other mechanosensory channels also function in the md proprioceptive neurons? The mechanotransduction channel Piezo is an appealing candidate since it is required in dbd neurons that are activated by stretch [10], but mutation of piezo does not cause any obvious impairment in larval locomotion [18]. NOMPC is required for normal locomotion [9], so it would be of interest to examine the effect of the nompC mutation on the activities ddaD and ddaE and on other proprioceptive neurons in exploring larvae. Correlating alterations in specific proprioceptor activity with changes in behavior like stride length, locomotion speed, or the ability to assume certain angular positions would be informative—and it is now possible with the high-speed microscopy. Interestingly, a role for NOMPC in locomotion is evolutionarily conserved in worms. In C. elegans, the NOMPC homolog is a mechanotransduction channel required in stretch-sensitive proprioceptive neurons for normal body posture during their locomotion [19, 20].
In conclusion, the ability to monitor changes in dendritic folding and activities of proprioceptive neurons in untethered, freely-moving animals in real time is a game-changer for defining how proprioceptive neurons modulate coordinated movements. This new technical ability opens the door to analyzing the proprioceptive neurons during other behaviors, such as the rapid rolling perpendicular to the body axis in response to nociceptive stimuli. Finally, in the future it would be of interest to test models concerning the specific roles of the individual md neurons for proprioceptive feedback, by acutely activating them using optogenetics, in the absence of the proprioceptive channels.
References
- 1.He L, Gulyanon S, Skanata MM, Karagyozov D, Heckscher E, Krieg M, Tsechpenaki G, Gershow M, and Tracey WD Jr. (2019). Direction selectivity in Drosophila proprioceptors requires the mechanosensory channel TMC. Curr. Biol (this issue). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vaadia R, Li W, Voleti V, Singhania A, Hillman EM, and Grueber WB (2019). Characterization of proprioceptive system dynamics in behaving Drosophila larvae using high-speed volumetric microscopy. Curr. Biol (this issue). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Green CH, Burnet B, and Connolly KJ (1983). Organization and patterns of inter- specific and intraspecific variation in the behavior of Drosophila larvae. Anim. Behav 31, 282–291. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berrigan D, and Pepin DJ (1995). How maggots move - allometry and kinematics of crawling in larval Diptera. J. Insect Physiol. 41, 329–337. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heckscher ES, Lockery SR, and Doe CQ (2012). Characterization of Drosophila larval crawling at the level of organism, segment, and somatic body wall musculature. J. Neurosci 32, 12460–12471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grueber WB, Jan LY, and Jan YN (2002). Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic sensory neurons. Development 129, 2867–2878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Song W, Onishi M, Jan LY, and Jan YN (2007). Peripheral multidendritic sensory neurons are necessary for rhythmic locomotion behavior in Drosophila larvae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 104, 5199–5204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hughes CL, and Thomas JB (2007). A sensory feedback circuit coordinates muscle activity in Drosophila. Mol. Cell. Neurosci 35, 383–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cheng LE, Song W, Looger LL, Jan LY, and Jan YN (2010). The role of the TRP channel NompC in Drosophila larval and adult locomotion. Neuron 67, 373–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Suslak TJ, Watson S, Thompson KJ, Shenton FC, Bewick GS, Armstrong JD, and Jarman AP (2015). Piezo is essential for amiloride-sensitive stretch-activated mechanotransduction in larval Drosophila dorsal bipolar dendritic sensory neurons. PLoS One 10, e0130969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guo Y, Wang Y, Zhang W, Meltzer S, Zanini D, Yu Y, Li J, Cheng T, Guo Z, Wang Q, et al. (2016). Transmembrane channel-like (tmc) gene regulates Drosophila larval locomotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7243–7248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang W, Yan Z, Jan LY, and Jan YN (2013). Sound response mediated by the TRP channels NOMPC, NANCHUNG, and INACTIVE in chordotonal organs of Drosophila larvae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang YV, Aikin TJ, Li Z, and Montell C (2016). The basis of food texture sensation in Drosophila. Neuron 91, 863–877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Walker RG, Willingham AT, and Zuker CS (2000). A Drosophila mechanosensory transduction channel. Science 287, 2229–2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Göpfert MC, Albert JT, Nadrowski B, and Kamikouchi A (2006). Specification of auditory sensitivity by Drosophila TRP channels. Nat. Neurosci [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Effertz T, Wiek R, and Göpfert MC (2011). NompC TRP channel is essential for Drosophila sound receptor function. Curr. Biol 21, 592–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pan B, Akyuz N, Liu XP, Asai Y, Nist-Lund C, Kurima K, Derfler BH, Gyorgy B, Limapichat W, Walujkar S, et al. (2018). TMC1 Forms the Pore of Mechanosensory Transduction Channels in Vertebrate Inner Ear Hair Cells. Neuron 99, 736–753 e736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gorczyca DA, Younger S, Meltzer S, Kim SE, Cheng L, Song W, Lee HY, Jan LY, and Jan YN (2014). Identification of Ppk26, a DEG/ENaC channel functioning with Ppk1 in a mutually dependent manner to guide locomotion behavior in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 9, 1446–1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li W, Feng Z, Sternberg PW, and Xu XZ (2006). A C. elegans stretch receptor neuron revealed by a mechanosensitive TRP channel homologue. Nature 440, 684–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kang L, Gao J, Schafer WR, Xie Z, and Xu XZ (2010). C. elegans TRP family protein TRP-4 is a pore-forming subunit of a native mechanotransduction channel. Neuron 67, 381–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]