Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2019 Aug 29;294(42):15408–15417. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010130

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ inactivation prevents vitreous-induced activation of AKT/MDM2/p53 and migration of retinal pigment epithelial cells

Haote Han ‡,§,¶,, Na Chen ‡,§,**, Xionggao Huang ‡,§,‡‡, Bing Liu ‡,§, Jingkui Tian ¶,, Hetian Lei ‡,§,1
PMCID: PMC6802499  PMID: 31467081

Abstract

Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) are a family of lipid kinases that play a critical role in transmitting signals from cell-surface molecules to intracellular protein effectors. Key PI3Ks include PI3Kα, PI3Kβ, and PI3Kδ, which are regulated by receptors. The signaling pathway comprising the PI3Ks, along with a Ser/Thr kinase (AKT), a proto-oncogene product (mouse double minute (MDM)2), and a tumor suppressor protein (p53), plays an essential role in experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), which is a fibrotic blinding eye disorder. However, which PI3K isoforms are involved in PVR is unknown. A major characteristic of PVR is the formation of epi (or sub)-retinal membranes that consist of extracellular matrix and cells, including retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells, glial cells, and macrophages. RPE cells are considered key players in PVR pathogenesis. Using immunoblotting and immunofluorescence analyses, we herein provide the evidence that PI3Kδ is highly expressed in human RPEs when it is primarily expressed in leukocytes. We also found that PI3Kδ inactivation through two approaches, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated depletion and a PI3Kδ-specific inhibitor (idelalisib), not only blocks vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 but also abrogates a vitreous-stimulated decrease in p53. Furthermore, we demonstrate that PI3Kδ inactivation prevents vitreous-induced proliferation, migration, and contraction of human RPEs. These results suggest that PI3Kδ may represent a potential therapeutic target for RPE-related eye diseases, including PVR.

Keywords: phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase), Akt PKB, mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2), p53, migration

Introduction

Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks)2 are a family of lipid kinases, which phosphorylate the 3-hydroxyl of the inositol ring of inositol lipids to generate phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate, phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate, and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate at the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (1, 2). Receptor-regulated PI3Ks include heterodimeric PI3Kα, PI3Kβ, and PI3Kδ (1, 2). Their regulatory subunit p85 that contains Src homology 2 and 3 domains can bind to the phosphorylated tyrosine in the YXXM motif of receptor tyrosine kinases (e.g. platelet-derived growth factor receptor) so that their catalytic subunit (p110α, p110β, or p110δ) can phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to become phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate, which in turn can be bound by pleckstrin homology domain-containing proteins such as AKT, an oncogene product also known as protein kinase B (1, 36). This binding facilitates AKT to be phosphorylated by phosphoinositide-dependent kinase I at threonine 308 and by the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 at serine 473 (1, 6, 7). Activation of AKT can stimulate multiple cellular processes such as cell survival, proliferation, growth, as well as migration (6, 8, 9). So PI3Ks play an essential role in transmitting signals from cell-surface molecules into the intracellular enzymes as well as in stimulating cellular responses (1, 2, 10). However, the contribution of most of the PI3K isoforms to organismal function and disease still remains obscured.

PI3Kα and PI3Kβ are ubiquitously expressed, and knockout of their catalytic subunit p110α or p110β is embryonic lethal, whereas mice without a catalytic subunit (p110δ) of PI3Kδ are viable (2, 1012). In humans, high expression of PI3Kδ is seen in spleen and thymus (13). However, the expressional pattern and function of PI3Kδ in retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPEs) have not been explored.

Deregulation of PI3Ks may initiate multiple diseases such as cancer and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (1416), a blinding eye disease with a major characteristic of epi (or sub)-retinal membranes (ERMs) that consists of extracellular matrix and cells, which include RPEs, glial cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages (17, 18). In the pathogenesis of PVR, RPEs are exposed to vitreous during open global injury or retinal re-attachment surgery, and these cells along with other cell types (e.g. glial cells) migrate, proliferate, grow, and secrete extracellular matrix, resulting in the formation of ERMs whose contraction causes retinal detachment (1722). However, which PI3K isoform(s) contribute to PVR pathogenesis is still unknown.

In this study, we found that PI3Kδ is highly expressed in human RPEs, and inactivation of PI3Kδ with its specific inhibitor idelalisib or CRISPR/Cas9-mediated depletion suppresses vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 and degradation of p53, proliferation, migration, as well as contraction of human RPEs.

Results

PI3Kδ is highly expressed in RPEs

Previous studies have demonstrated that PI3Ks play a central role in experimental PVR (14, 16), but which PI3K isoform contributes to the pathogenesis of PVR is still a mystery. In addition, PI3Kδ was originally reported to be restricted to hematopoietic cells (2, 2325); however, surprisingly, Western blot analysis of the cell lysates showed that p110δ, a catalytic isoform of PI3Kδ, was highly expressed in cultured human RPEs, including ARPE-19, a spontaneously arising retinal pigment epithelial cell line, and primary human fetal RPE (PRPEs), whereas low levels of p110δ expression were detected in other cell lines examined, including human corneal fibroblast (HCF), mouse cone cells (661W), a human retinoblastoma cell line (Y-79), rabbit conjunctival fibroblast (RCF), and porcine aortic vascular endothelial cells (PAECs) (Fig. 1A). In addition, p110α (Fig. 1, A and D) was expressed in all the examined cell lines at similar levels, and p110β was expressed approximately twice more and p110γ less in RPEs than those in 661W cells (Fig. 1, B, E, and F). Specifically, expression of p110δ in RPEs was ∼10 times higher than that in 661W cells and around 1-fold lower than that in a mouse macrophage RAW264.7 cell line, which served as a positive control (Fig. 1, C and G). Taken together, these results suggest that PI3Kδ may play an essential role in vitreous-induced signaling events (e.g. AKT activation) in RPEs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

p110δ is highly expressed in human RPEs. A–C, proteins in lysates of RCF (mouse cone cells), Y79 (HTB-18, human retinoblastoma), HCF, PAEC, ARPE-19 cells, PRPEs, and RAW (macrophages RAW264.7) were subjected to Western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies. This is representative of three independent experiments. D–G, intensity of the p110α, -β, -γ, and -δ bands in A–C was first normalized to that of the corresponding β-actin bands and then calculated to establish the ratio of the control in the 1st lane. The graphs are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test. **, ***, and **** are <0.01, <0.001, and <0.0001, respectively. ns, not significant.

Depletion of p110δ with CRISPR/Cas9

The technology of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) can be harnessed for depleting gene expression by genome editing (2629). Next, we identified that one sgRNA (named PK2, AGAGCGGCTCATACTGGGCG) from exon 4 in the human genomic PIK3CD locus (Fig. S1A) was able to guide SpCas9 to cleave the locus at its expected site (Fig. S1B), resulting in ∼90% depletion of p110δ in ARPE-19 cells analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. S1, C and D); in addition, p110δ was hardly detectable by immunofluorescence in most of the ARPE-19 cells expressing PK2–sgRNA/Cas9 compared with those expressing lacZ–sgRNA/Cas9 (Fig. S1F). Furthermore, Western blotting and immunofluorescence analysis showed that this CRISPR/Cas9-mediated depletion of p110δ did not have significant impact on expression of p110α (Fig. S1, C, E, and G), suggesting that this PK2–sgRNA is specific to PIK3CD, and the p110δ antibody we used herein is specific to p110δ.

Depletion of p110δ attenuates vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 and decrease of p53

Previously, we found that PI3K is critical for vitreous-mediated activation of AKT and MDM2 and decrease of p53 (16), and blockade of the interaction of MDM2 with p53 suppresses experimental PVR (30). Therefore, we investigated whether depletion of p110δ in ARPE-19 cells had any influence on the pathway of AKT/MDM2/p53. Compared with treatments with a single growth factor or cytokine or their combination, vitreous treatment is more relevant to an in vivo environment for PVR development (3134). In addition, rabbits are usually used to induce PVR (15, 3436) because the smaller size of the rabbit lens as compared with that of the eyeball permits manipulations to be performed within the eye, without causing any damage to the lens and retina; however, other common laboratory animals such as rats and mice are difficult to work with because of the small volume of vitreous (20, 37, 38). Therefore, ARPE-19 cells were treated with normal vitreous from experimental rabbits (RV) for 2 h based on a previously established time course (16). As shown in Fig. 2, vitreous induced an increase (4.1 ± 0.3-fold) in phosphorylated AKT (Ser-473) and (3.3 ± 0.2-fold) in phosphorylated MDM2 (Ser-166), and an ∼70% decrease in p53, but depletion of p110δ in these cells blocked these biochemical events, suggesting that PI3Kδ is a primary PI3K isoform mediating the vitreous-induced pathway of AKT/MDM2/p53.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Depletion of p110δ suppresses vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 and a decrease in p53. A, ARPE-19 cells expressing PK2–sgRNA/Cas9 or lacZ–sgRNA/Cas9 were serum-starved for 24 h and then treated with normal RV for 2 h. Their lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies. This is representative of three independent experiments. B, intensity of the bands (e.g. in A) from three independent experiments was quantified in the graphs. **** indicates significant difference (p < 0.001) using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test. ns, not significant.

Re-expression of p110δ restores vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 and decrease of p53

To exclude the off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas9, we re-expressed a mouse PIK3CD cDNA in APRE-19 cells whose endogenous one had been depleted by CRISPR/Cas9 because the mouse PIK3CD would not be recognized by the human-specific sgRNA (PK2) of the CRISPR/Cas9. As shown in Fig. 3, transducing the mouse PIK3CD into the p110δ-depleted ARPE-19 cells raised their p110δ levels slightly higher than their original ones; in addition, re-expression of mouse p110δ in the p110δ-depleted ARPE-19 cells recovered RV-induced AKT and MDM2 activation and p53 degradation (Fig. 3). These results further illustrate that PI3Kδ plays an essential role in the vitreous-induced signaling pathway of PI3K/AKT/MDM2/p53 in RPE cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Re-expression of mouse p110δ enhances vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 and degradation of p53. A, ARPE-19 cells whose endogenous p110δ had been depleted by expressing PK2–sgRNA/Cas9 were transduced with retroviruses that contained a mouse PIK3CD mRNA, and an empty retroviral vector pLNCX3 was serum-deprived for 24 h and then treated with RV for 2 h. Their lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies. This is representative of three independent experiments. B, intensity of the bands in A from three independent experiments was quantified in the graphs. **** indicates significant difference (p < 0.001) using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test. ns, not significant. (m)p110δ, mouse p110δ.

Pharmacological inhibition of PI3Kδ effectively prevents vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 and reduction of p53

Next, a pharmacological approach was used to assess whether PI3Kδ was required for vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 and degradation of p53. Idelalisib, a specific inhibitor of PI3Kδ, is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug for treating certain cancers. To establish the maximum-tolerated dose of idelalisib in cultured RPEs, we treated ARPE-19 cells with serially increasing concentrations of idelalisib: 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 μm in serum-free media for 72 h (10). The results showed that 80 μm idelalisib became obviously toxic to ARPE-19 cells by morphology (e.g. cells shrinking) (Fig. S2A), and in these cells the IC50 of idelalisib was 61.5 μm, which was determined by MTT assay (Fig. S2B). However, 10 μm idelalisib did not show obvious toxicity to ARPE-19 cells except that cell number was less than those treated by its vehicle dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which was assessed by morphology under a microscope and MTT assay (Fig. S2).

To examine the impact of idelalisib on the PI3K/AKT/MDM2/p53 pathway, we still monitored phosphorylation of AKT at serine 473 and phosphorylation of ERK at tyrosine 204 as indirect measures of activation of these kinases (39). In addition, it has been reported that the clinical trial dose of idelalisib for drinking is 150 mg twice per day (23), and there are a number of publications using 10 μm idelalisib to inactivate PI3Kδ in cultured cells (4042) even though its IC50 to inhibit p110δ activity is 19 nm, which was evaluated by an in vitro biochemical assay (10). So we treated ARPE-19 cells with idelalisib (0.1, 1, and 10 μm) in addition to RV for 2 h. Western blot analysis of their lysates showed that idelalisib at 1 μm completely abrogated vitreous-induced activation of AKT, in contrast with ERK activation, which was not affected even if the cells were treated with idelalisib at 10 μm (Fig. 4, A and B). Importantly, idelalisib at 10 μm failed to inhibit PDGF-BB–induced AKT activation in 661W cells (Fig. 4, E and F), in which p110δ was expressed at very low levels compared with that in ARPE-19 cells (Fig. 1), indicative of idelalisib at 10 μm being selective. Furthermore, BYL719, whose IC50 to inhibit p110α activity is 4.0–4.8 nm (43), did not inhibit vitreous-induced AKT activation at 400 nm (100 times of its IC50) in ARPE-19 cells (Fig. 4, C and D), but at this dose BYL719 inhibited PDGF-BB–induced activation of AKT in 661W cells (Fig. 4, E and F). These results suggest that PI3Kδ is a predominantly functional receptor-regulated PI3K isoform for vitreous-induced activation of AKT in RPEs. Therefore, we next evaluated the impact of idelalisib on the AKT/MDM2/p53 pathway. As shown in Fig. 4, A, B, G, and H, idelalisib at 1 μm blocked vitreous-induced activation of AKT and MDM2 and suppressed vitreous-stimulated impact on p53 expression. This result is consistent with the depletion of p110δ with CRISPR/Cas9 (Figs. 2 and 3) preventing vitreous-induced activation of the AKT/MDM2/p53 pathway.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Pharmacological inhibition of p110δ blocks vitreous-stimulated activation of AKT and MDM2 and a decrease in p53. A, C, and G, after serum deprivation for 24 h, ARPE-19 cells were treated with RV in addition to idelalisib or BYL719 at the indicated concentrations or its vehicle (0.1% DMSO, V) for 2 h. Then, their lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies. This is representative of three independent experiments. E, serum-deprived 661W cells were treated with PDGF-BB in addition to idelalisib (1 and 10 μm), BYL719 (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 μm), or its vehicle (0.1% DMSO, V) for 15 min. Then, their lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies. This is representative of three independent experiments. B, D, F, and H, intensity of the p-AKT, p-MDM2, or p53 bands was first normalized to that of the corresponding AKT, MDM2, or β-actin bands and then calculated to establish the ratio of the control in the 1st lane. The graphs are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. **** indicates a significant difference between the compared two groups at p < 0.0001, respectively, using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test. ns, not significant.

Inactivation of PI3Kδ prevents vitreous-stimulated proliferation of RPEs

Activation of the PI3K/AKT/MDM2/p53 pathway can stimulate cell proliferation (2, 16), which is also a main characteristic for pathogenesis of PVR (16). Thus, we examined whether inactivation of PI3Kδ using the two approaches could block vitreous-induced cell proliferation. As shown in Fig. 5, A and B, although vitreous stimulated (1.8 ± 0.2-fold) proliferation of ARPE-19 cells, either depletion of p110δ with CRISPR/Cas9 or inhibition of PI3Kδ with idelalisib significantly suppressed vitreous-induced proliferation.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Inactivation of p110δ prevents vitreous-induced cell proliferation. ARPE-19 cells expressing lacZ–sgRNA/Cas9 or PK2–sgRNA/Cas9 (A) or plain ARPE-19 cells (B) were seeded into a 24-well plate at a density of 3 × 104 cells/well. After 8 h, the cells had attached to the plates, and the medium was switched to either 0.5 ml of DMEM (−) or RV (A) or RV supplemented with idelalisib (10 μm) or its vehicle (V) DMSO (B). After treating for 48 h, the cells were counted with a hemocytometer under a light microscope. The mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments is shown; *** denotes p < 0.001 using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test. ns, not significant.

Inactivation of PI3Kδ blocks vitreous-induced migration of RPEs

Activation of the PI3K/AKT/MDM2/p53 signaling pathway also affects cell motility (2, 16). During PVR pathogenesis, RPE cells proliferate and migrate from the RPE monolayer to form sheets of dedifferentiated cells, a major cellular constituent of ERMs from patients with PVR (44). We next examined the impact of PI3Kδ inactivation using the two approaches on vitreous-induced migration of ARPE-19 cells with a wound-healing assay, in which the wound was created by scratching the cells on culture plates with a 200-μl pipette tip (37, 45). As illustrated in Fig. 6, while vitreous stimulated cell migration into the wound areas, inactivation of PI3Kδ by either p110δ depletion with CRISPR/Cas9 or a specific pharmacological inhibitor idelalisib at 10 μm reversed vitreous-induced migration of ARPE-19 cells to levels that were even lower than in controls, indicating that both induced and constitutive PI3Kδ activity contribute to cell migration.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Inactivation of p110δ abrogates vitreous-induced cell migration. After ARPE-19 cells expressing lacZ–sgRNA/Cas9 or PK2–sgRNA/Cas9 (A) or plain ARPE-19 cells (B) in a 24-well plate reached confluence, they were serum-starved for 24 h. Then, the wells with cells were scratched with a 200-μl pipette tip and treated with RV or RV in addition to idelalisib (10 μm) or its vehicle. 16–20 h later, pictures of the cells were taken and analyzed. Representative raw data of three experiments below the bar graphs is shown. Scale bar, 400 μm. The mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments is shown; *** indicates p < 0.001 using ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test. ns, not significant.

Inactivation of PI3Kδ abrogates vitreous-induced contraction of RPEs

A main characteristic of PVR is the formation of ERMs, whose contraction causes retinal detachment (17, 34, 46). To mimic the interaction of cells with extracellular matrix for contraction, an in vitro contraction assay was used even though this assay was far from the in vivo environment (37, 46). To investigate the impact of PI3Kδ inactivation on the capability of the cell contraction, two approaches by either depletion of p110δ with CRISPR/Cas9 or inhibiting its kinase activity with a specific inhibitor idelalisib were utilized. As shown in Fig. 7A, vitreous significantly induced contraction of cells expressing lacZ–sgRNA/Cas9, and the contraction capability was significantly attenuated in the RPEs expressing PK2–sgRNA/Cas9; in addition, idealisib also blocked the vitreous-induced contraction of ARPE-19 cells in this collagen contraction assay (Fig. 7B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Inactivation of p110δ inhibits vitreous-induced contraction of RPEs. ARPE-19 cells expressing lacZ–sgRNA/Cas9 or PK2–sgRNA/Cas9 (A) or plain ARPE-19 cells (B) were resuspended in neutralized collagen and seeded into wells of a 24-well plate and treated with RV in addition to idelalisib (10 μm) for 2 days. The gel diameter was measured and calculated using the formula (3.14 × (diameter/2)2). A, lacZ: ARPE-19 cells expressing lacZ–sgRNA/Cas9 as a control; PK2: ARPE-19 cells expressing PI3KCD-sgRNA/Cas9. B, V: vehicle, 0.1% DMSO; idelalisib 10 μm. The mean ± S.D. of the three independent experiments is shown, and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's post test. *** indicates p < 0.001. A photograph of the representative experiment is shown at the bottom of the bar graphs. ns, not significant.

Discussion

In this paper, we report that p110δ is highly expressed in RPEs, and inactivation of PI3Kδ using molecular and pharmacological approaches blocks vitreous-induced activation of AKT/MDM2/p53 as well as cellular responses intrinsic to the development of PVR. RPEs have several functions (light absorption, epithelial transport, spatial ion buffering, visual cycle, phagocytosis, secretion, and immune modulation) (47) and are involved in age-related macular degeneration (48), retinitis pigmentosa (49), diabetic retinopathy (50, 51), and PVR (35). p110δ has been found to be mostly expressed in hematopoietic systems, including myeloid cells, B cells, and T cells, and plays key roles in leukocyte signaling, proliferation, differentiation, activation, and chemotaxis (2, 13, 52, 53). Our findings reported herein expand the research scope of PI3Kδ, which at present is mostly focused on the hematopoietic system, indicating deregulation of PI3Kδ may involve in RPE-related pathology such as PVR.

PVR is a blinding complication that develops in 8–10% of patients with primary retinal detachment (19, 5459) and in 40–60% of patients with open-globe injury (20, 54, 6068). So far, repeat surgery is the only option to treat PVR, but this surgery has poor functional results (18, 20, 34). Even though tremendous efforts have been made to identify nonsurgical approaches for prevention of PVR, they have not been successful. The PI3Kδ/AKT-signaling pathway is hyperactive in the vitreal environment, suggesting PI3Kδ is a promising target for the therapy of PVR.

However, the mechanisms by which inactivation of PI3Kδ blocks vitreous-stimulated activation of AKT/MDM2/p53 warrants further investigation because RPE cells express multiple other isoforms of PI3Ks, including PI3Kα, PI3Kβ, and PI3Kγ. Based on that, idelalisib inhibits vitreous-induced activation of AKT in RPEs but not PDGF-BB–stimulated AKT activation in 661W cells (Fig. 4). Because RPEs express much more p110δ than do 661W cells (Fig. 1), we propose the following three hypotheses: 1) in RPE cells PI3Kδ is one of the predominant isoforms of PI3Ks; 2) vitreous induces a specific p85 regulatory subunit to activate p110δ; and 3) vitreous stimulates a specific AKT isoform via PI3Kδ for activating MDM2. These hypotheses are actively being examined in my laboratory.

Idelalisib is a potent, small-molecule inhibitor of PI3Kδ that is highly selective for the δ isoform of PI3K, as compared with the α, β, and γ isoforms of PI3Ks. In lymphoid cell lines and primary samples from patients, idelalisib blocks PI3Kδ–AKT signaling (23, 42). Similarly, inactivation of PI3Kδ abrogated vitreous-stimulated activation of AKT and degradation of p53 (Figs. 24). AAV-based CRISPR/Cas9 has been in clinical trial for treating human diseases especially eye disease (29); in addition, idelalisib has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of certain hematological malignancies (2, 53); therefore, these genome-editing and pharmacological (idelalisib) approaches to targeting PI3Kδ have great potential for therapeutic treatment of RPE-related diseases, including PVR.

Materials and methods

Major reagents

Primary antibodies against p-AKT (Ser-473), AKT, p-MDM2 (Ser-166), MDM2, p-ERK (Thr-202/Tyr-204), ERK, Hsp90α, p110α, p110β, p110δ, and p110γ were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA); antibodies against p53 and β-actin were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Secondary antibodies, horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, and goat anti-mouse IgG, were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Enhanced chemiluminescent substrate for detection of horseradish peroxidase was from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). Idelalisib was purchased from APExBIO (Houston, TX), and BYL719 was from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, Michigan). PDGF-BB was purchased from Peprotech Inc. (Rocky Hill, NJ).

Human primary fetal RPE cells (Lonza, Walkersville, MD), ARPE-19 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), and PAECs were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/nutrient mixture (DMEM/F-12, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). RCFs (15) and PAECs (69) were gifts from the Kazlauskas' lab at Schepens Eye Research Institute (Boston, MA), and HCFs were a gift of the Zieske lab (70) at Schepens Eye Research Institute. Mouse cone photoreceptor cells (661W) were obtained by material transfer agreement from University of Houston (71). Human retinoblastoma Y-79 cells and RAW264.7 mouse macrophages were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. Y-79, HCF, 661W, and RAW264.7 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS.

DNA constructs

The 20-nt target DNA sequence preceding a 5′-NGG PAM sequence at exon 4 in the human genomic PIK3CD locus (NG_023434) (72) was selected for generating sgRNA for SpCas9 targets using the CRISPR design website. The control sgRNA sequence (5′-TGCGAATACGCCCACGCGATGGG-3′) was designed to target the lacZ gene from Escherichia coli (73). The lentiCRISPR v2 vector (74) was purchased from Addgene (52961) (72).

To express SpGuides in the targeted cells, the top oligonucleotides 5′-CACCG-20-nt (target PI3KCD DNA sequence PK2 (AGAGCGGCTCATACTGGGCG) or the lacZ sgRNA sequence)-3′ and the bottom oligonucleotides 5′-AAAC-20-nt (20-nt: complementary target PI3KCD DNA sequences or lacZ sgRNA sequence)-C-3′ were annealed and cloned into the lentiCRISPR v2 vector by BsmBI (New England Biolabs, Boston, MA), respectively. All clones were confirmed by DNA sequencing using primer 5′-GGACTATCATATGCTTACCG-3′ from a sequence of the U6 promoter that drives expression of sgRNAs. DNA synthesis and sequencing were done by Massachusetts General Hospital DNA Core Facility (Cambridge, MA).

Production of lentivirus

Lentivirus was produced as described previously (72). Briefly, the lentiCRISPR v2 vector inserted with sgRNA, the packaging plasmid psPAX2 (Addgene, 12260), and the envelope plasmid VSV-G (Addgene, 8454) were mixed together and then added to a mixture of Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). This transfection mix was kept at room temperature for 30 min and then carefully added into HEK 293T cells in a 60-mm cell culture dish. After 18 h (37 °C, 5% CO2), the medium was replaced with growth medium supplemented with 20% FBS, and lentiviruses were harvested at 24 h after changing the medium and then daily for 2 days. The virus-containing media were pooled and centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min to remove the cell debris. The supernatant was used to infect APRE-19 cells supplemented with 8 μg/ml Polybrene (Sigma). The infected cells were selected in media using puromycin (Sigma) (4 μg/ml), and the resulting cells were examined by Western blotting (21, 31, 75).

Re-expression of p110δ

This experiment was performed as described previously (37). Briefly, the mouse PIK3CD cDNA in the vector pCMV-SPORT6 (MMM1013-202765002, GE Dharmacon, Waltham, MA) was subcloned into a retroviral vector of pLNCX3 (LTR—CMV-SalI-HpaI-SacI-NotI-BgeII-ClaI—LTR) derived from pLNCX (GenBankTM accession no. M28247; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda) by SalI/NotI (37) and confirmed by Sanger DNA sequencing. The sequence-confirmed retroviral vector was transfected into 293GPG cells for producing retroviruses, which were used for infecting ARPE-19 cells whose endogenous p110δ had been depleted by the CRISPR/Cas9. This mouse PIK3CD cDNA circumvented recognition by the human originated PK2–sgRNA of the CRISPR/Cas9, and its expression was confirmed by Western blotting.

Western blotting

When cells reached 90% confluence in 24-well plates, they were serum-starved for 24, and then treated with normal rabbit vitreous (RV, diluted 1:3 in DMEM/F-12) in addition to idelalisib or its vehicle (0.01% DMSO: DMSO) for 2 h. After being washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the cells were lysed in 1× sample buffer diluted with protein extraction buffer (10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mm EDTA, 50 mm NaCl, 50 mm NaF, 1% Triton X-100, 20 μg/ml aprotinin, 2 mm Na3VO4, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) from 5× sample buffer (25 mm EDTA, 10% SDS, 500 mm DTT, 50% sucrose, 500 mm Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 0.5% bromphenol blue). The lysates were boiled for 5 min and then centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000 × g at 4 °C. Proteins in samples were separated in 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for Western blot analysis using desired antibodies. Signal intensity was determined by densitometry using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) (21, 33).

Immunofluorescence

This experiment was performed as described previously (37). Briefly, cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde/PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Then, the samples were blocked with 5% normal goat serum in 0.3% Triton X-100/PBS for 30 min and incubated with a primary antibody from rabbit against p110δ (Abcam) or p110α (1:100 dilution) in combination with mouse against pan-keratin or nonimmune mouse and rabbit IgG overnight at 4 °C. After thorough washes with PBS to get rid of the nonspecific binding, the samples were incubated with fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies Dylight 549 (anti-rabbit IgG) and Dylight 488 (anti-mouse IgG) (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) (1:300 dilution in a blocking buffer) for 1 h. After thorough washes with PBS, the slides were mounted with a mount medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories). These slides were observed and photographed under a fluorescent microscope (30, 37, 69).

MTT assay

The toxicity of Idelalisib on cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay (Solarbio). ARPE-19 cells were seeded into 96-well plates in their respective medium supplemented with 10% FBS and incubated for 24 h before exposure to a range of concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μm) of idelalisib dissolved in DMSO in 5% FBS-supplemented medium or serum-free medium for 24–72 h. Subsequently, the medium was removed and replaced with 200 μl of 0.5 mg/ml MTT in 5% FBS-containing medium or serum-free medium, and the cells were incubated in the CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 2 h. Supernatants were removed from the wells, and the MTT dye was solubilized in 150 μl/well DMSO. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm on a plate reader. Each condition was tested with six replicates, and all assays were performed in triplicate (76, 77).

Cell proliferation assay

Cells were plated in 24-well plates at a density of 3 × 104 cells/well in DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 10% FBS. Following attachment, the cells were treated with DMEM/F-12 or RV (1:3 dilution in DMEM/F-12) plus idelalisib (10 μm) or its vehicle DMSO. After treatment for 48 h, the cells were trypsin-detached from the plates and counted in a hemocytometer under a light microscope. At least three independent experiments were performed as described previously (31, 33, 75).

Cell migration assay

After cells in 24-well plates were grown to confluence, they were serum-starved overnight. Then, a wound was created by scratching the monolayer with a 200-μl pipette tip (37, 45). The cells were washed with PBS and treated with DMEM/F-12 or RV (1:3 dilution in DMEM/F-12) plus idelalisib (10 μm) or its vehicle DMSO. The scratched area was photographed to capture the initial width and photographed again 16–20 h later. Data were analyzed using Adobe Photoshop CS4 software. At least three independent experiments were performed.

Collagen contraction assay

Cells were resuspended in 1.5 mg/ml neutralized collagen I (INAMED, Fremont, CA), pH 7.2, on ice at a density of 1 × 106/ml cells/ml (15, 75). The cell and gel mixture was transferred into wells of 24-well plates, which had been preincubated overnight with 5 mg/ml BSA/PBS. When the gel became a solid jelly-like soft material after incubation at 37 °C for 90 min, 0.5 ml of DMEM/F-12 or RV (1:3 dilution in DMEM/F-12) was added with or without idelalisib (10 μm). On day 3, the gel diameter was measured, and the gel area was calculated using a formula 3.14 × r2, where r is the radius of the gel. At least three independent experiments were performed as described in previous reports (37, 75, 78).

Statistics

The experimental data were analyzed using an unpaired t test between two groups and one-way ANOVA among more than two groups followed by the Tukey post test using GraphPad Prism Version 5c. A p value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Author contributions

H. H. and X. H. data curation; H. H. and H. L. funding acquisition; H. H., N. C., X. H., B. L., and H. L. investigation; H. H., N. C., and B. L. methodology; H. H. writing-original draft; J. T. and H. L. conceptualization; J. T. supervision; H. L. writing-review and editing.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01EY012509, Research to Prevent Blindness (to H. L.), Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School (to H. L.), and China Scholarship Council Grant 01806320148 (to H. H.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

This article contains Figs. S1 and S2.

2
The abbreviations used are:
PI3K
phosphoinositide 3-kinase
RCF
rabbit conjunctival fibroblast
HCF
human corneal fibroblast
PAEC
porcine aortic vascular endothelial cell
ANOVA
analysis of variance
RV
rabbit vitreous
PDGF
platelet-derived growth factor
DMEM
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
FBS
fetal bovine serum
PVR
proliferative vitreoretinopathy
RPE
retinal pigment epithelium
PRPE
primary human fetal RPE
ERM
epi (or sub)-retinal membrane
ERK
extracellular signal-regulated kinase
nt
nucleotide
LTR
long-terminal repeat
FDA
Food and Drug Administration
MTT
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide
sgRNA
single-guide RNA
CRISPR
clustered regularly interspaced short panlindromic repeats
Cas
CRISPR-associated endonuclease 9.

References

  • 1. Vanhaesebroeck B., Stephens L., and Hawkins P. (2012) PI3K signalling: the path to discovery and understanding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 195–203 10.1038/nrm3290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bilanges B., Posor Y., and Vanhaesebroeck B. (2019) PI3K isoforms in cell signalling and vesicle trafficking. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 515–534 10.1038/s41580-019-0129-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Songyang Z., Shoelson S. E., Chaudhuri M., Gish G., Pawson T., Haser W. G., King F., Roberts T., Ratnofsky S., and Lechleider R. J. (1993) SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences. Cell 72, 767–778 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90404-E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Burgering B. M., and Coffer P. J. (1995) Protein kinase B (c-AKT) in phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase signal transduction. Nature 376, 599–602 10.1038/376599a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Franke T. F., Yang S. I., Chan T. O., Datta K., Kazlauskas A., Morrison D. K., Kaplan D. R., and Tsichlis P. N. (1995) The protein kinase encoded by the AKT proto-oncogene is a target of the PDGF-activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Cell 81, 727–736 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90534-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Manning B. D., and Toker A. (2017) AKT/PKB signaling: navigating the network. Cell 169, 381–405 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sarbassov D. D., Guertin D. A., Ali S. M., and Sabatini D. M. (2005) Phosphorylation and regulation of AKT/PKB by the rictor–mTOR complex. Science 307, 1098–1101 10.1126/science.1106148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vivanco I., and Sawyers C. L. (2002) The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 489–501 10.1038/nrc839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Luo J., Manning B. D., and Cantley L. C. (2003) Targeting the PI3K–AKT pathway in human cancer: rationale and promise. Cancer Cell 4, 257–262 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00248-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Somoza J. R., Koditek D., Villaseñor A. G., Novikov N., Wong M. H., Liclican A., Xing W., Lagpacan L., Wang R., Schultz B. E., Papalia G. A., Samuel D., Lad L., and McGrath M. E. (2015) Structural, biochemical, and biophysical characterization of idelalisib binding to phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 8439–8446 10.1074/jbc.M114.634683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Vanhaesebroeck B., Leevers S. J., Ahmadi K., Timms J., Katso R., Driscoll P. C., Woscholski R., Parker P. J., and Waterfield M. D. (2001) Synthesis and function of 3-phosphorylated inositol lipids. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 535–602 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Clayton E., Bardi G., Bell S. E., Chantry D., Downes C. P., Gray A., Humphries L. A., Rawlings D., Reynolds H., Vigorito E., and Turner M. (2002) A crucial role for the p110δ subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in B cell development and activation. J. Exp. Med. 196, 753–763 10.1084/jem.20020805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Vanhaesebroeck B., Welham M. J., Kotani K., Stein R., Warne P. H., Zvelebil M. J., Higashi K., Volinia S., Downward J., and Waterfield M. D. (1997) P110δ, a novel phosphoinositide 3-kinase in leukocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 4330–4335 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ikuno Y., Leong F. L., and Kazlauskas A. (2002) PI3K and PLCγ play a central role in experimental PVR. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 483–489 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lei H., Velez G., Hovland P., Hirose T., Gilbertson D., and Kazlauskas A. (2009) Growth factors outside the PDGF family drive experimental PVR. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50, 3394–3403 10.1167/iovs.08-3042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lei H., Velez G., and Kazlauskas A. (2011) Pathological signaling via platelet-derived growth factor receptor α involves chronic activation of AKT and suppression of p53. Mol. Cell Biol. 31, 1788–1799 10.1128/MCB.01321-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pennock S., Haddock L. J., Eliott D., Mukai S., and Kazlauskas A. (2014) Is neutralizing vitreal growth factors a viable strategy to prevent proliferative vitreoretinopathy? Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 40, 16–34 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pastor J. C., Rojas J., Pastor-Idoate S., Di Lauro S., Gonzalez-Buendia L., and Delgado-Tirado S. (2016) Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a new concept of disease pathogenesis and practical consequences. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 51, 125–155 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cui J., Lei H., Samad A., Basavanthappa S., Maberley D., Matsubara J., and Kazlauskas A. (2009) PDGF receptors are activated in human epiretinal membranes. Exp. Eye Res. 88, 438–444 10.1016/j.exer.2008.10.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Agrawal R. N., He S., Spee C., Cui J. Z., Ryan S. J., and Hinton D. R. (2007) In vivo models of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Nat. Protoc. 2, 67–77 10.1038/nprot.2007.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lei H., Qian C. X., Lei J., Haddock L. J., Mukai S., and Kazlauskas A. (2015) RasGAP promotes autophagy and thereby suppresses platelet-derived growth factor receptor-mediated signaling events, cellular responses, and pathology. Mol. Cell. Biol. 35, 1673–1685 10.1128/MCB.01248-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yao H., Ge T., Zhang Y., Li M., Yang S., Li H., and Wang F. (2019) BMP7 antagonizes proliferative vitreoretinopathy through retinal pigment epithelial fibrosis in vivo and in vitro. FASEB J. 33, 3212–3224 10.1096/fj.201800858RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gopal A. K., Kahl B. S., de Vos S., Wagner-Johnston N. D., Schuster S. J., Jurczak W. J., Flinn I. W., Flowers C. R., Martin P., Viardot A., Blum K. A., Goy A. H., Davies A. J., Zinzani P. L., Dreyling M., et al. (2014) PI3Kδ inhibition by idelalisib in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1008–1018 10.1056/NEJMoa1314583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Foukas L. C., Berenjeno I. M., Gray A., Khwaja A., and Vanhaesebroeck B. (2010) Activity of any class IA PI3K isoform can sustain cell proliferation and survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 11381–11386 10.1073/pnas.0906461107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Vanhaesebroeck B., Guillermet-Guibert J., Graupera M., and Bilanges B. (2010) The emerging mechanisms of isoform-specific PI3K signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 329–341 10.1038/nrm2882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhang F. (2015) CRISPR-Cas9: prospects and challenges. Hum. Gene Ther. 26, 409–410 10.1089/hum.2015.29002.fzh [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wu W., Tang L., D'Amore P. A., and Lei H. (2017) Application of CRISPR-Cas9 in eye disease. Exp. Eye Res. 161, 116–123 10.1016/j.exer.2017.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Wu W., Yang Y., and Lei H. (2019) Progress in the application of CRISPR: from gene to base editing. Med. Res. Rev. 39, 665–683 10.1002/med.21537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Maeder M. L., Stefanidakis M., Wilson C. J., Baral R., Barrera L. A., Bounoutas G. S., Bumcrot D., Chao H., Ciulla D. M., DaSilva J. A., Dass A., Dhanapal V., Fennell T. J., Friedland A. E., Giannoukos G., et al. (2019) Development of a gene-editing approach to restore vision loss in Leber congenital amaurosis type 10. Nat. Med. 25, 229–233 10.1038/s41591-018-0327-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lei H., Rheaume M. A., Cui J., Mukai S., Maberley D., Samad A., Matsubara J., and Kazlauskas A. (2012) A novel function of p53: a gatekeeper of retinal detachment. Am. J. Pathol. 181, 866–874 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.05.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lei H., and Kazlauskas A. (2009) Growth factors outside of the PDGF family employ ROS/SFKs to activate PDGF receptor α and thereby promote proliferation and survival of cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 6329–6336 10.1074/jbc.M808426200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lei H., and Kazlauskas A. (2014) A reactive oxygen species-mediated, self-perpetuating loop persistently activates platelet-derived growth factor receptor α. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 110–122 10.1128/MCB.00839-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Duan Y., Ma G., Huang X., D'Amore P. A., Zhang F., and Lei H. (2016) The clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats-associated endonuclease 9 (CRISPR/Cas9)-created MDM2 T309G mutation enhances vitreous-induced expression of MDM2 and proliferation and survival of cells. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 16339–16347 10.1074/jbc.M116.729467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zhou G., Duan Y., Ma G., Wu W., Hu Z., Chen N., Chee Y., Cui J., Samad A., Matsubara J. A., Mukai S., D'Amore P. A., and Lei H. (2017) Introduction of the MDM2 T309G mutation in primary human retinal epithelial cells enhances experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, 5361–5367 10.1167/iovs.17-22045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Andrews A., Balciunaite E., Leong F. L., Tallquist M., Soriano P., Refojo M., and Kazlauskas A. (1999) Platelet-derived growth factor plays a key role in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 2683–2689 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ikuno Y., and Kazlauskas A. (2002) An in vivo gene therapy approach for experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy using the truncated platelet-derived growth factor α receptor. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 2406–2411 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ma G., Duan Y., Huang X., Qian C. X., Chee Y., Mukai S., Cui J., Samad A., Matsubara J. A., Kazlauskas A., D'Amore P. A., Gu S., and Lei H. (2016) Prevention of proliferative vitreoretinopathy by suppression of phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinases. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57, 3935–3943 10.1167/iovs.16-19405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hou H., Nudleman E., and Weinreb R. N. (2018) Animal models of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and their use in pharmaceutical investigations. Ophthalmic Res. 60, 195–204 10.1159/000488492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ali K., Bilancio A., Thomas M., Pearce W., Gilfillan A. M., Tkaczyk C., Kuehn N., Gray A., Giddings J., Peskett E., Fox R., Bruce I., Walker C., Sawyer C., Okkenhaug K., et al. (2004) Essential role for the p110δ phosphoinositide 3-kinase in the allergic response. Nature 431, 1007–1011 10.1038/nature02991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gnanasundram S. V., Pyndiah S., Daskalogianni C., Armfield K., Nylander K., Wilson J. B., and Fåhraeus R. (2017) PI3Kδ activates E2F1 synthesis in response to mRNA translation stress. Nat. Commun. 8, 2103 10.1038/s41467-017-02282-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Herman S. E., Gordon A. L., Wagner A. J., Heerema N. A., Zhao W., Flynn J. M., Jones J., Andritsos L., Puri K. D., Lannutti B. J., Giese N. A., Zhang X., Wei L., Byrd J. C., and Johnson A. J. (2010) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-δ inhibitor CAL-101 shows promising preclinical activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by antagonizing intrinsic and extrinsic cellular survival signals. Blood 116, 2078–2088 10.1182/blood-2010-02-271171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Lannutti B. J., Meadows S. A., Herman S. E., Kashishian A., Steiner B., Johnson A. J., Byrd J. C., Tyner J. W., Loriaux M. M., Deininger M., Druker B. J., Puri K. D., Ulrich R. G., and Giese N. A. (2011) CAL-101, a p110δ selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, inhibits PI3K signaling and cellular viability. Blood 117, 591–594 10.1182/blood-2010-03-275305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Fritsch C., Huang A., Chatenay-Rivauday C., Schnell C., Reddy A., Liu M., Kauffmann A., Guthy D., Erdmann D., De Pover A., Furet P., Gao H., Ferretti S., Wang Y., Trappe J., et al. (2014) Characterization of the novel and specific PI3Kα inhibitor NVP-BYL719 and development of the patient stratification strategy for clinical trials. Mol. Cancer Ther. 13, 1117–1129 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wong C. A., Potter M. J., Cui J. Z., Chang T. S., Ma P., Maberley A. L., Ross W. H., White V. A., Samad A., Jia W., Hornan D., and Matsubara J. A. (2002) Induction of proliferative vitreoretinopathy by a unique line of human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 37, 211–220 10.1016/S0008-4182(02)80112-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Liang C. C., Park A. Y., and Guan J. L. (2007) In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 2, 329–333 10.1038/nprot.2007.30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Schiff L., Boles N. C., Fernandes M., Nachmani B., Gentile R., and Blenkinsop T. A. (2019) P38 inhibition reverses TGFβ1 and TNFα-induced contraction in a model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Commun. Biol. 2, 162 10.1038/s42003-019-0406-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Strauss O. (2005) The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiol. Rev. 85, 845–881 10.1152/physrev.00021.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Fisher C. R., and Ferrington D. A. (2018) Perspective on AMD pathobiology: a bioenergetic crisis in the RPE. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59, AMD41–AMD47 10.1167/iovs.18-24289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ferrari S., Di Iorio E., Barbaro V., Ponzin D., Sorrentino F. S., and Parmeggiani F. (2011) Retinitis pigmentosa: genes and disease mechanisms. Curr. Genomics 12, 238–249 10.2174/138920211795860107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ponnalagu M., Subramani M., Jayadev C., Shetty R., and Das D. (2017) Retinal pigment epithelium-secretome: a diabetic retinopathy perspective. Cytokine 95, 126–135 10.1016/j.cyto.2017.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Simó R., Villarroel M., Corraliza L., Hernández C., and Garcia-Ramírez M. (2010) The retinal pigment epithelium: something more than a constituent of the blood-retinal barrier–implications for the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010, 190724 10.1155/2010/190724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Puri K. D., and Gold M. R. (2012) Selective inhibitors of phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ: modulators of B-cell function with potential for treating autoimmune inflammatory diseases and B-cell malignancies. Front. Immunol. 3, 256 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Yang Q., Modi P., Newcomb T., Quéva C., and Gandhi V. (2015) Idelalisib: first-in-class PI3K δ inhibitor for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic leukemia, and follicular lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 1537–1542 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Morescalchi F., Duse S., Gambicorti E., Romano M. R., Costagliola C., and Semeraro F. (2013) Proliferative vitreoretinopathy after eye injuries: an overexpression of growth factors and cytokines leading to a retinal keloid. Mediators Inflamm. 2013, 269787 10.1155/2013/269787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Abrams G. W., Azen S. P., McCuen B. W. 2nd, Flynn H. W. Jr., Lai M. Y., and Ryan S. J. (1997) Vitrectomy with silicone oil or long-acting gas in eyes with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy: results of additional and long-term follow-up. Silicone Study Report 11. Arch. Ophthalmol. 115, 335–344 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150337005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Pastor-Idoate S., Rodríguez-Hernández I., Rojas J., Fernández I., García-Gutiérrez M. T., Ruiz-Moreno J. M., Rocha-Sousa A., Ramkissoon Y., Harsum S., MacLaren R. E., Charteris D., VanMeurs J. C., González-Sarmiento R., Pastor J. C., and Genetics on PVR Study Group. (2013) The T309G MDM2 gene polymorphism is a novel risk factor for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. PLoS One 8, e82283 10.1371/journal.pone.0082283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Casaroli-Marano R. P., Pagan R., and Vilaró S. (1999) Epithelial–mesenchymal transition in proliferative vitreoretinopathy: intermediate filament protein expression in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 2062–2072 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Connor T. B. Jr., Roberts A. B., Sporn M. B., Danielpour D., Dart L. L., Michels R. G., de Bustros S., Enger C., Kato H., and Lansing M. (1989) Correlation of fibrosis and transforming growth factor-β type 2 levels in the eye. J. Clin. Invest. 83, 1661–1666 10.1172/JCI114065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Leaver P. K., and Billington B. M. (1989) Vitrectomy and fluid/silicone-oil exchange for giant retinal tears: 5 years follow-up. Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 227, 323–327 10.1007/BF02169405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Schmidt G. W., Broman A. T., Hindman H. B., and Grant M. P. (2008) Vision survival after open globe injury predicted by classification and regression tree analysis. Ophthalmology 115, 202–209 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Cleary P. E., and Ryan S. J. (1979) Experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rabbit. II. Histology of wound, vitreous, and retina. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 63, 312–321 10.1136/bjo.63.5.312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Cleary P. E., and Ryan S. J. (1979) Experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rabbit. I. Method of production and natural history. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 63, 306–311 10.1136/bjo.63.5.306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Erdurman F. C., Hurmeric V., Gokce G., Durukan A. H., Sobaci G., and Altinsoy H. I. (2011) Ocular injuries from improvised explosive devices. Eye 25, 1491–1498 10.1038/eye.2011.212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Colyer M. H., Chun D. W., Bower K. S., Dick J. S., and Weichel E. D. (2008) Perforating globe injuries during operation Iraqi Freedom. Ophthalmology 115, 2087–2093 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Weichel E. D., Colyer M. H., Ludlow S. E., Bower K. S., and Eiseman A. S. (2008) Combat ocular trauma visual outcomes during operations Iraqi and enduring freedom. Ophthalmology 115, 2235–2245 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Zhou Q., Xu G., Zhang X., Cao C., and Zhou Z. (2012) Proteomics of post-traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy in rabbit retina reveals alterations to a variety of functional proteins. Curr. Eye Res. 37, 318–326 10.3109/02713683.2011.635397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Vergara O., Ogden T., and Ryan S. (1989) Posterior penetrating injury in the rabbit eye: effect of blood and ferrous ions. Exp. Eye Res. 49, 1115–1126 10.1016/S0014-4835(89)80030-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Négrel A. D., and Thylefors B. (1998) The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 5, 143–169 10.1076/opep.5.3.143.8364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lei H., Romeo G., and Kazlauskas A. (2004) Heat shock protein 90α-dependent translocation of annexin II to the surface of endothelial cells modulates plasmin activity in the diabetic rat aorta. Circ. Res. 94, 902–909 10.1161/01.RES.0000124979.46214.E3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Guo X., Hutcheon A. E., Melotti S. A., Zieske J. D., Trinkaus-Randall V., and Ruberti J. W. (2007) Morphologic characterization of organized extracellular matrix deposition by ascorbic acid-stimulated human corneal fibroblasts. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 4050–4060 10.1167/iovs.06-1216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Tan E., Ding X. Q., Saadi A., Agarwal N., Naash M. I., and Al-Ubaidi M. R. (2004) Expression of cone-photoreceptor-specific antigens in a cell line derived from retinal tumors in transgenic mice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 764–768 10.1167/iovs.03-1114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Huang X., Zhou G., Wu W., Ma G., D'Amore P. A., Mukai S., and Lei H. (2017) Editing VEGFR2 blocks VEGF-induced activation of AKT and tube formation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, 1228–1236 10.1167/iovs.16-20537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Swiech L., Heidenreich M., Banerjee A., Habib N., Li Y., Trombetta J., Sur M., and Zhang F. (2015) In vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 102–106 10.1038/nbt.3055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Sanjana N. E., Shalem O., and Zhang F. (2014) Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods 11, 783–784 10.1038/nmeth.3047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Lei H., Velez G., Cui J., Samad A., Maberley D., Matsubara J., and Kazlauskas A. (2010) N-Acetylcysteine suppresses retinal detachment in an experimental model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 177, 132–140 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Lei H., Qi J., Song J., Yang D., Wang Y., Zhang Y., and Yang J. (2006) Biosynthesis and bioactivity of trichosanthin in cultured crown gall tissues of Trichosanthes kirilowii Maximowicz. Plant Cell Rep. 25, 1205–1212 10.1007/s00299-006-0187-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Stockert J. C., Horobin R. W., Colombo L. L., and Blázquez-Castro A. (2018) Tetrazolium salts and formazan products in Cell Biology: Viability assessment, fluorescence imaging, and labeling perspectives. Acta Histochemica 120, 159–167 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Lei H., Rhéaume M. A., Velez G., Mukai S., and Kazlauskas A. (2011) Expression of PDGFRα is a determinant of the PVR potential of ARPE19 cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 5016–5021 10.1167/iovs.11-7442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES