TABLE 1:
Barrier | Alcoholic Hepatitis | NASH | Solution |
---|---|---|---|
General Barriers | • Social stigma • Lack of awareness • Lack of clear regulatory pathway |
• Lack of awareness | Education |
Populations | • Lack of consensus Related to definitions and nomenclature • Heterogeneity in terms of clinical-histological-molecular phenotypes • Lack of data linking well definited phenotypes to specific outcomes |
• Heterogeneity of populations with respect to risk of progression and natural history of precirrhotic versus cirrhotic stages of the disease | • Alcoholic Hepatitis: collaborative efforts between NIAAA, academia and regulatory agencies. • NASH: distinct trial design and endpoints for those with precirrhotic vs cirrhotic NASH |
Endpoints | • Endpoints not cleanly linked to drivers of outcomes • Timing of outcome measurement affects assessment of drug interventions • Lack of validated endpoints other than mortality |
• Need for a liver biopsy to assess short-term outcomes • Lack of validated surrogate endpoints |
• Multi-stakeholder collaboration to validate clinical endpoints and natural course of disease for specific populations of subjects with alcoholic liver disease or NASH |
Safety | • DILI assessment is unclear • Lack of clarity on safety assessment related to intestinal microbiome |
• DILI assessment is unclear • Lack of clarity on safety assessment related to intestinal microbiome |
• Collaborative multi-stakeholder effort to generate the evidence base to support guidance on safety assessment • Ongoing FDA efforts to generate guidance |
Biomarkers | • Gaps in knowledge related to distinct clinical-histological-molecular subpopulations | • Lack of point of care assessment tool • Lack of validated PRO |
• Large cohort and case control studies accompanied by biomarker assessment • Assessment of novel biomarkers in circulation, urine, breath or stool |